Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Background
Composite materials are formed from two or more dissimilar materials, each of which
contributes to the final properties. Unlike metallic alloys, the materials in a composite
remain distinct from each other at the macroscopic level. Most engineering composites
consist of two materials: a reinforcement called a filler and a matrix. The filler provides
stiffness and strength; the matrix holds the material together and serves to transfer load
among the discontinuous reinforcements (Daniel, I. M., Ishai, O., Daniel, I. M., & Daniel,
I.,1994)
Nowadays the composite materials are commonly used in aircraft (Fig. 1) and space
structures due to their high specific strength, specific stiffness and superior damping (Zhai,
Y., Li, D., Li, X., & Wang, L. ,2015).
Figure 2. Schematics of different failure modes (Heimbs, S., Schmeer, S., Blaurock, J.,
& Steeger, S. 2013).
2. Literature Review
In the past years, many experimental and numerical analyses have been carried out
around several geometric and mechanical parameters in composite bolted joints.
Although the characterization of joint failure in bolted composite laminate is not a trivial
task, since there is a large number of parameters involved, numerous studies found in
specialized literature focus on the fastener features and the laminate geometry near the
joint, such as bolt diameter, bolt-hole clearance, plate width and thickness, end distance,
laminate stacking sequences and bolt pre-tightening. These studies are conducted in
order to establish a useful tool that can relate the aforementioned joint features to failure
modes and strength of the mechanically fasten laminates. The most common geometric
parameters analyzed in the technical literature are presented in Fig. 3.
The effects of bolt torque tightening on the strength of bolted fiber reinforced polymers
laminates, where the bearing failure mode was promoted, have been studied by
Giannopoulus et al. (2017) It was found that bolt torque pre-tightening has a positive
impact on the static strength of bolted joints. The data showed an increase in the joint
static strength with high pre-tightening levels. Changes in damage pattern and the zone
where failure takes place were observed with variations in the pre-tightening torque.
Relatively heavy torqued pre-tightened joints gave rise to failures further away the washer
and contact area.
Nerilli and Vario (2017) conducted a finite-element computational analysis aiming to
predict the bearing failure mechanism for composite bolted joints. The numerical data
showed that the bearing failure load increases nearly proportionally with the laminate
thickness, for unidirectional laminates, when the angle between the fibers and load
direction is smaller than 15°.
3. Conceptual Design
Aiming for a solution to some of the main problems in composite joints previously
analyzed, a conceptual design was conducted with the help of the functional analysis
technique.
Several conceptual models were proposed, endeavoring to achieve an improvement in
the joint performance. Although double lap joins have shown better performance in real
assemblies, the models were constructed as a single lap join; keeping in mind that the
objective is to perform a functional analysis of the elements in the joint. A single lap join
model allows better understand of the joint behavior.
After the functional analysis of 40 preliminary ideas, two prototype models for the new
conceptual bolted composite joint were developed.
Both model’s characteristics are presented below:
Model 1: The fastener is a hub, tightened by a screw and a washer in both plates
free surface. A hub substitutes the screw (in conventional composite bolted joints),
trying to reduce stress concentration in the threated bolt-composited interface.
Also, neighboring hubs are linked by a sill plate, in the load direction, aiming for a
better load distribution in the free surface of the composite laminates.
Model 2: A “U” shape fastener, tightened by a screw and a washer in both ends,
substitute the single hole-bolt arrangement in conventional composite bolted joints.
The flat side of the "U" shape fastener has an increased curvature towards the load
direction, allocating the load distribution on the opposite side of where the bearing
failure usually appear. Moreover, the “U” shape fastener reduce stress
concentration in the threated bolt-composited interface, preventing from cross-
thread failure in the bolt-hole interface between the screw and the composite
laminate. A “hump” is added in the interface between the two composite laminates,
aiming for rise in the contact area that enhances the friction for the “no slip”
condition” between plates. One of the plates has a "hump", while the other plate
has a "sink" where the "hump" of the first plate fits. In a composite-metal joint, a
“sink” can be easily machined in the metal element, and the “hump” can be added
with the help of a core in the composite laminate. A smooth curvature in the hump-
sink geometry avoids possible stress concentration.
From the two preliminary models aforementioned, a comparative analysis was conducted,
with the help of the decision matrix shown below. The factors and its weights were chosen
after the information pinpointed in the literature review.
MANUFACTURING
LOWER EFFECTS
BEARING TYPE
COMPONENTS
COMPOSITE
FAILURE
WEIGHT
NO SLIP
ON THE
COST
EASY
Figure 4. “U” shape fastener CAD model. The fastener is tightened in both sides with a
screw and a washer, and the flat side of the fastener has a curvature towards the load
direction.
Figure 5. Lateral view of the new conceptual composite joint. The “hump” is added in the
interface between plates, below the flat plate of the fastener.
a)
b)
Figure 6. a) Top view drawing of the new conceptual composite joint. b) Cross section
view along the A-A axis of the new conceptual composite joint, note the hump design.
References
Daniel, I. M., Ishai, O., Daniel, I. M., & Daniel, I. (1994). Engineering mechanics of
composite materials (Vol. 3, pp. 256-256). New York: Oxford university press.
Zhai, Y., Li, D., Li, X., & Wang, L. (2015). An experimental study on the effect of joining
interface condition on bearing response of single-lap, countersunk composite-aluminum
bolted joints. Composite Structures, 134, 190-198.
Pramanik, A., Basak, A. K., Dong, Y., Sarker, P. K., Uddin, M. S., Littlefair, G., &
Chattopadhyaya, S. (2017). Joining of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP)
composites and aluminium alloys–A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and
Manufacturing, 101, 1-29.
Heimbs, S., Schmeer, S., Blaurock, J., & Steeger, S. (2013). Static and dynamic failure
behaviour of bolted joints in carbon fibre composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science
and Manufacturing, 47, 91-101.
Giannopoulos, I. K., Doroni-Dawes, D., Kourousis, K. I., & Yasaee, M. (2017). Effects of
bolt torque tightening on the strength and fatigue life of airframe FRP laminate bolted
joints. Composites Part B: Engineering, 19-26.
Nerilli, F., & Vairo, G. (2017). Progressive damage in composite bolted joints via a
computational micromechanical approach. Composites Part B: Engineering, 111, 357-
371.
Sen, F., Pakdil, M., Sayman, O., & Benli, S. (2008). Experimental failure analysis of
mechanically fastened joints with clearance in composite laminates under preload.
Materials & Design, 29(6), 1159-1169.
Lee, Y. G., Choi, E., & Yoon, S. J. (2015). Effect of geometric parameters on the
mechanical behavior of PFRP single bolted connection. Composites Part B: Engineering,
75, 1-10.
McCarthy, M. A., Lawlor, V. P., Stanley, W. F., & McCarthy, C. T. (2002). Bolt-hole
clearance effects and strength criteria in single-bolt, single-lap, composite bolted joints.
Composites Science and Technology, 62(10), 1415-1431.
Lopez-Cruz, P., Laliberté, J., & Lessard, L. (2017). Investigation of bolted/bonded
composite joint behaviour using design of experiments. Composite Structures, 170, 192-
201.
Yun, J. H., Choi, J. H., & Kweon, J. H. (2014). A study on the strength improvement of the
multi-bolted joint. Composite Structures, 108, 409-416.