Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
.
1. Individuals have to be recognised for his part.
TABEL NO:1
GRAPH NO:1
45%
40%
35%
30%
Strongly Agree
% of respondent
25%
Agree
20%
Neither Agree or Disagree
15%
Disagree
10%
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
Opinions of Respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 40% of the respondents strongly agree
that the individuals have to be recognised for his/her part, 33% of the respondents agree,
14% of the respondents neither agree or disagree,7% of the respondents disagree and 6% of
the respondents strongly disagree that individuals have to be recognised for his/her part.
2. Individuals with effective guidance and control can be developed over a
period of time.
TABEL NO:2
GRAPH NO:2
50%
45%
40%
% of Respondents
35%
30% Strongly Agree
25% Agree
20% Neither Agree or Disagree
15% Disagree
10% Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
Opinions of Respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 27% of the respondents strongly agree
that individuals with effective guidance and control can be developed over a period of time,
43%of the respondents agree, 16%neither agree or disagree, 8% of the respondents disagree
and 6% of the respondents strongly disagree that individuals with effective guidance and
control can be developed over a period of time.
TABEL NO:3
GRAPH NO:3
40%
35%
% of Respondents
30%
10% Disagree
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 28%of the respondents strongly agree that
performance expectation/ targets of employee are to be linked with company goals with
better result,36%of the respondents agree, 20%of the respondents neither agree or disagree,
10% of the respondents disagree and 6%of the respondents strongly disagree that individuals
with effective guidance and control can be developed over a period of time.
4. Performance management to be used in providing information on the
contribution of HR to strategic objectives of company.
TABEL NO:4
GRAPH NO:4
50%
45%
40%
% of respondents
35%
30% Strongly Agree
25% Agree
20% Neither Agree or Disagree
15% Disagree
10%
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 24% of the respondents strongly agree
that performance management to be used in providing information on the contribution of HR
to strategic objectives of company, 46%of the respondents agree, 14%neither agree or
disagree, 7% of the respondents disagree and 9% of the respondents strongly disagree that
performance management to be used in providing information on the contribution of HR to
strategic objectives of company.
5. Superior should give feedback on employee behavior that is expected of them
on the job.
TABEL NO: 5
GRAPH NO:5
40%
35%
30%
% of respondents
10% Disagree
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 27% of the respondents strongly agree
that superior should give feedback on employee behaviour that is expected of them on the
job, 43%of the respondents agree, 16%neither agree or disagree, 8% of the respondents
disagree and 6% of the respondents strongly disagree that superior should give feedback on
employee behaviour that is expected of them on the job.
6. Superior should make the employee to understand their mistakes in a
friendly.
TABEL NO: 6
GRAPH NO:6
40%
35%
30%
% of respondent
0%
1
opinion of repondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 16% of the respondents strongly agree
that superior should make the employee to understand their mistakes in a friendly, 21%of the
respondents agree, 38%neither agree or disagree, 16% of the respondents disagree and 9% of
the respondents strongly disagree that superior should make the employee to understand their
mistakes in a friendly.
7. Performance management system helps in developing the career of employee.
TABEL NO: 7
GRAPH NO: 7
35%
30%
25%
% of respondent
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
15%
Neither Agree or Disagree
10% Disagree
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 14% of the respondents strongly agree
that performance management system helps in developing the career of employee, 31%of the
respondents agree, 29%neither agree or disagree, 19% of the respondents disagree and 7% of
the respondents strongly disagree that performance management system helps in developing
the career of employee.
8. Through their performance management system an employee can gain insight
into his strength and weakness.
TABEL NO: 8
GRAPH NO: 8
35%
30%
25%
% of respondent
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
15%
Neither Agree or Disagree
10% Disagree
5% Strongly Disagree
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 14% of the respondents strongly agree
that through their performance management system an employee can gain insight into his
strength and weakness, 26%of the respondents agree, 33%neither agree or disagree, 7% of
the respondents disagree and 20% of the respondents strongly disagree that through their
performance management system an employee can gain insight into his strength and
weakness.
9. Through this system subordinates can compete with the performance in
changing era.
TABEL NO: 9
GRAPH NO: 9
25%
20%
% of respondent
0%
1
opinion respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 17% of the respondents strongly agree
that through this system subordinates can compete with the performance in changing era,
20%of the respondents agree, 23%neither agree or disagree, 20% of the respondents disagree
and 20% of the respondents strongly disagree that through this system subordinates can
compete with the performance in changing era.
10. The system of assessing an individual performance through various
managerial committees.
TABEL NO: 10
GRAPH NO: 10
30%
25%
% of respondent
20%
Strongly Agree
15% Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
10%
Disagree
5% Strongly Disagree
0%
1
opinion respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 13% of the respondents strongly agree
that the system of assessing an individual performance through various managerial
committees, 24%of the respondents agree, 26%neither agree or disagree, 27% of the
respondents disagree and 10% of the respondents strongly disagree the system of assessing
an individual performance through various managerial committees.
11. Superiors should effectively communicate the results of employees
performance in worthy.
TABEL NO: 11
GRAPH NO: 11
35%
30%
25%
% of respondent
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
15%
Neither Agree or Disagree
10% Disagree
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 29% of the respondents strongly agree
that superiors should effectively communicate the results of employees performance in
worthy, 31%of the respondents agree, 11%neither agree or disagree, 13% of the respondents
disagree and 16% of the respondents strongly disagree that superiors should effectively
communicate the results of employees performance in worthy.
12. Superiors & subordinates should work together to design development plans
for individuals.
TABEL NO: 12
GRAPH NO: 12
40%
35%
30%
% of respondents
0%
1
opinion of respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 20% of the respondents strongly agree
that superiors & subordinates should work together to design development plans for
individuals, 37%of the respondents agree, 20%neither agree or disagree, 13% of the
respondents disagree and 10% of the respondents strongly disagree that superiors &
subordinates should work together to design development plans for individuals.
13. Employees should have a clear understanding of the Options scale in the
performance appraisal process.
TABEL NO: 13
GRAPH NO: 13
35%
30%
25%
% of respondents
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
15%
Neither Agree or Disagree
10% Disagree
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondents
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 17% of the respondents strongly agree
that employees should have a clear understanding of the Options scale in the performance
appraisal process, 30%of the respondents agree, 33%neither agree or disagree, 11% of the
respondents disagree and % of the respondents strongly disagree that employees should have
a clear understanding of the Options scale in the performance appraisal process.
14. Employees should have adequate involvement in fixing their performance
expectations.
TABEL NO: 14
GRAPH NO: 14
40%
35%
30%
% of respondents
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 11% of the respondents strongly agree
that employees should have adequate involvement in fixing their performance expectations,
34%of the respondents agree, 29%neither agree or disagree, 19% of the respondents disagree
and7% of the respondents strongly disagree that employees should have adequate
involvement in fixing their performance expectations.
15. Appraisals in the organization should clearly link to performance
improvement.
TABEL NO: 15
GRAPH NO: 15
30%
25%
% of respondent
20%
Strongly Agree
15% Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
10%
Disagree
5% Strongly Disagree
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 17% of the respondents strongly agree
that appraisals in the organization should clearly link to performance improvement, 27%of
the respondents agree, 20%neither agree or disagree, 26% of the respondents disagree and
10% of the respondents strongly disagree that appraisals in the organization should clearly
link to performance improvement.
16. Good performance is to be duly recognized in organization
TABEL NO: 16
GRAPH NO: 16
35%
30%
25%
% of respondent
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
15%
Neither Agree or Disagree
10% Disagree
5% Strongly Disagree
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 14% of the respondents strongly agree
that good performance is to be duly recognised in organisation, 26%of the respondents agree,
21%neither agree or disagree, 29% of the respondents disagree and 10% of the respondents
strongly disagree that good performance is to be duly recognised in organisation.
17. There should be a well-designed reward system.
TABEL NO: 17
GRAPH NO: 17
40%
35%
30%
% of respondent
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 37% of the respondents strongly agree
that there should be a well-designed reward system, 26%of the respondents agree,
17%neither agree or disagree, 13% of the respondents disagree and 7% of the respondents
strongly disagree that there should be a well-designed reward system.
18. Proper recognition for achieving is the best reward.
TABEL NO: 18
GRAPH NO: 18
45%
40%
35%
% of respondent
30%
Strongly Agree
25%
Agree
20%
Neither Agree or Disagree
15%
Disagree
10%
Strongly Disagree
5%
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 40% of the respondents strongly agree
that proper recognition for achieving is the best reward, 34%of the respondents agree, 10%
neither agree or disagree, 7% of the respondents disagree and 9% of the respondents strongly
disagree that proper recognition for achieving is the best reward.
19. Individuals should be strictly punished for non-achievements of targets
which is mutually agreed upon.
TABEL NO: 19
GRAPH NO: 19
30%
25%
% of respondent
20%
Strongly Agree
15% Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
10%
Disagree
5% Strongly Disagree
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 14% of the respondents strongly agree
that individuals should be strictly punished for non-achievements of targets which is mutually
agreed upon, 20%of the respondents agree, 26%neither agree or disagree, 21% of the
respondents disagree and 19% of the respondents strongly disagree that individuals should
be strictly punished for non-achievements of targets which is mutually agreed upon.
20. There should be a clear link between pay & performance.
TABEL NO: 20
GRAPH NO: 20
30%
25%
% of respondent
20%
Strongly Agree
15% Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
10%
Disagree
5% Strongly Disagree
0%
1
opinion of respondent
INTERPRETATION
From the above diagram, it can be interpreted that, 13% of the respondents strongly agree
that there should be a clear link between pay & performance, 24%of the respondents agree,
26%neither agree or disagree, 27% of the respondents disagree and 10% of the respondents
strongly disagree that there should be a clear link between pay & performance.
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
Performance management is a process that provides feedback,
accountability, and documentation for performance outcomes. It helps
employees to channel their talents towards organizational goals.
I request you to kindly spare a few minutes of your time and give your
sincere opinion for the questions. The information will be used only for my
academic purpose.
RATING SCALE FOR THE QUESTIONNAIRE:
1. Strongly Agree
2. Agree
3. Neutral
4. Disagree
5. Strongly Disagree
Name:
Age:
Designation:
SNO DESCRIPTION RATING SCALE
Performance management in an effective way for company to achieve their goal also
a good way to get better performance form the employees. In any business PM consider some
common objectives such as assign the goal, make plan train the workers for specific goal,
give then feedback about their job what they have done. PM is the only one process to make
the business in the right way. Business target should be in range, that should be achievable,
also it should be in touch of workers. Another thing is management should give the workers
proper payment for their work, they should get more than thet what expect from the
company. If companies can come to this decision then they can easily achieve their target.
This company has well laid management system. To maintain their management
throughout they have given prime importance to human resource. As a result the performance
management system in Hindustan shipyard limited is very crucial to maintain. The
measurement of the performance is done on the annual basis but the performance of the
employee recorded by his/her supervisor on each movement. On this analysis the training
needs of the company are identified.Appraisal exercise is necessary tool to measure the
employee’s worth of the performance.
SUGGESTIONS
Performance Management System (PMS) is the heart of any “People Management
Process” in the organisation. Organisations exist to perform. If people do not perform,
organisations don’t survive. If people perform at their peak level, organisations can
compete and create waves. The performance appraisal system has to be based on clearly
specified and measurable standards and indicators. Goals have to be consistent and
mutually decided by the employee and management. The appraisal format should be
practical and simple, the process should be participatory and open, It should be linked
with rewards. Feedback is an important part of appraisal, and has to be timely impersonal
and noticeable.
2. Make employees to feel that appraisals are motivating factor and are continues internal
assessment process best conducted by those inside the organisations.
3. PMS in the company should have scope for helping each employee in discovering his
potentials
4. The management should make clear to every employee about how their performance is
measured.
BIBLOGRAPHY
http://www.managementstudyguide.com/human-resource-
management.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/vizag_port
http://www.vizagport.com