Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Minerals Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Single particle impact breakage characteristics of clinkers from different plants were determined by the
Received 13 March 2009 drop-weight technique. Impact breakage distribution parameter (t10) defined by Narayanan [Narayanan,
Accepted 6 June 2009 S.S., Whiten, W.J., 1983. Breakage characteristics for ores for ball mill modelling. In: Proceeding of the
Available online 13 August 2009
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 286, pp. 31–39.] was used to characterise the break-
age distributions of different clinkers based on the specific comminution energy. The single particle
Keywords: impact breakage resistance parameter as represented by A b [Man, Y.T., 2000. A model based scale-up
Comminution
procedure for wet, overflow ball mills. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mining, Minerals and Materials Engi-
Crushing
Sizing
neering, The University of Queensland] based on the model parameters of the well known Ecst10 rela-
Particle size tionship given by Leung [Leung, K., 1987. An energy-based ore specific model for autogeneous and
semi-autogeneous grinding. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland, JKMRC] was correlated with
the standard bond index number, belite and alite mineral amounts.
Ó 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Zhang, 1992) have investigated the single particle impact breakage Table 1
characteristics of clinkers, a detailed study that demonstrates the Drop-weight test characteristics.
breakage distributions of clinkers with different mineral composi- Samples Energy levels (kW h/t)
tions is still lacking. Clinker-1 2.79, 3.32, 4.82
The study aimed to investigate the breakage distributions of dif- Clinker-2 3.15, 3.95, 4.94
ferent clinkers on the basis of energy level and establish the rela- Clinker-3 2.42, 2.67, 4.25
tionships between single particle impact breakage resistance Clinker-4 2.86, 3.32, 4.14
Clinker-5 1.00, 2.08, 3.05
parameter A b, standard bond work index number, alite and belite Clinker-6 1.16, 2.01, 3.01
mineral amounts of different clinkers. It was demonstrated that, Clinker-7 1.07, 2.03, 3.17
clinkers with similar elemental composition constitute different Clinker-8 1.08, 2.11, 3.15, 4.25
mineral proportions and grindabilities. Clinker-9 1.07, 2.09, 3.14, 4.23
2. Breakage tests
Clinker-1
Drop-weight apparatus used in this study is shown in Fig. 1 100
with its design characteristics. Breakage set-up test specifications
were reported by Genc et al. (2004). Table 1 summarizes the en-
Cumulative Passing %
ergy levels studied on each sample. Clinkers provided from nine
different cement plants were used in the tests. Samples were dry
sieved to the size fraction of 9.5 + 8.0 mm and on the average
90 particles were broken at each energy level to characterise the 10
breakage distributions.
Product size distributions resulting from the breakage of 2.79 kWh/t
9.5 + 8.0 mm sized particles at different impact energy levels 3.32 kWh/t
were determined by dry sieving and the 50% passing size (d50) of
4.82 kWh/t
each distribution was determined. Size normalized cumulative
passing distributions of breakage products were constructed on 1
the basis of specific impact energy in which the particle size is re- 0.10 1.00 10.00
scaled by the median size (d50) of the breakage products indicating d/d50
the similarity of breakage distributions independent of particle
Fig. 2. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-1.
size.
Size normalized distributions of each test fraction at different
specific comminution energy levels were found not to coincide Clinker-2
on a single distribution indicating that, energy level has an effect 100
on breakage patterns of each size. Non-self similar breakage size
distributions resulted at an energy level of 1 kW h/t were attrib-
Cumulative Passing %
7
h=107. 5cm
Clinker-3 Clinker-6
100 100
Cumulative Passing %
Cumulative Passing %
10 10
1 1
0.10 1.00 10.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50 d/d50
Fig. 4. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-3. Fig. 7. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-6.
Clinker-4 Clinker-7
100 100
Cumulative Passing %
Cumulative Passing %
10 10
2.86 kWh/t
1.07 kWh/t
3.32 kWh/t
2.03 kWh/t
4.14 kWh/t 3.17 kWh/t
1
1
0.10 1.00 10.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50
d/d50
Fig. 5. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-4.
Fig. 8. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-7.
Clinker-5
100 Clinker-8
100
Cumulative Passing %
Cumulative Passing %
10
10
Clinker-1 (exp)
80
Clinker-2 (exp)
70 Clinker-3 (exp)
Clinker-4 (exp)
60 Clinker-5 (exp)
Clinker-6 (exp)
50 Clinker-7 (exp)
t10 (%)
Clinker-8 (exp)
40
Clinker-9 (exp)
Fig. 11. Ecst10 relationships for 9.5 + 8.0 mm size fraction of different clinkers.
Table 2
Size-specific impact breakage parameters for different clinkers.
Size fraction (mm) Impact parameter Clinker-1 Clinker-2 Clinker-3 Clinker-4 Clinker-5 Clinker-6 Clinker-7 Clinker-8 Clinker-9
9.5 + 8.0 Ab 52.88 56.74 38.65 45.93 24.68 43.94 27.70 16.33 14.76
R2 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.993 0.977 0.999
1164 Ö. Genç, A.H. Benzer / Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165
Table 3
Chemical and mineralogical compositions of clinkers.
Primary oxides Clinker-1 Clinker-2 Clinker-3 Clinker-4 Clinker-5 Clinker-6 Clinker-7 Clinker-8 Clinker-9
CaO 64.65 66.21 64.79 66.42 63.44 64.49 64.22 65.90 66.95
SiO2 20.40 21.33 21.53 21.60 21.47 21.05 21.03 21.31 20.98
Al2O3 5.76 4.56 5.60 6.40 5.69 5.14 5.46 5.59 5.54
Fe2O3 2.56 3.38 2.90 3.68 4.01 4.12 3.96 3.95 3.79
MgO 2.66 1.31 1.54 0.65 2.42 2.98 2.31 0.88 0.84
K2O 0.94 0.54 0.89 0.43 0.96 0.49 0.94 0.92 0.83
Na2O 0.25 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.38 0.33 0.35 0.26 0.25
SO3 1.76 1.67 1.64 0.6 0.91 1.19 0.85 0.39 0.35
Cl– 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 – 0.005 0.005
LOI 0.44 0.25 0.31 0.10 – 0.15 – – –
Mineral content %
C3S 65.75 71.92 58.32 54.94 48.41 57.75 56.80 52.83 55.13
C2S 8.89 6.90 17.73 18.41 25.13 16.85 17.52 21.24 22.76
C3A 10.93 6.36 9.93 11.68 8.32 6.66 7.77 8.13 8.27
C4AF 7.79 10.28 8.82 10.66 12.19 12.54 12.06 12.01 11.55
80 20
W i =0.4024 (C2 S%)+5.1463
70 18
R 2 =0.7815
60 16
W i (kWh/t)
50 14
12
A.b
40
10
30
8
20 0 10 20 30 40
10 C2S (%)
18
Fig. 12. Relationship between A b and C2S%.
16
W i (kWh/t)
14
80
12
70 W i =-0.4099 (C3 S%)+35.685
10
60 R 2 =0.9187
8
50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C3S (%)
A.b
40
Fig. 15. Correlation between bond work index and C3S%.
30
References Napier-Munn, T.J., Morrell, S., Morrison, R.D., Kojovic T., 1996. Mineral comminution
circuits their operation and optimization. JKMRC, Brisbane, 413.
Narayanan, S.S., 1985. Development of a laboratory single particle breakage
Altun, A., 1998. Microscopic criteria for quality control of clinker. Cement and
technique and its application to ball mill modelling and scale-up. Ph.D.
Concrete World (25), 22–32.
Thesis, The University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Altun, A., 1999. Effects of kiln system on microstructure of clinker. Cement and
Narayanan, S.S., Whiten, W.J. 1983. Breakage characteristics for ores for ball mill
Concrete World (19), 33–41.
modelling. In: Proceeding of the Australasian Institute of Mining and
Andersen, J.S., 1988. Development of a cone crusher model. M.Eng.Sc. Thesis, The
Metallurgy, vol. 286, pp. 31–39.
University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Tavares, L.M., 1999. Energy absorbed in breakage of single particles in drop-weight
Asim, M.E., 1984. Investigations of cement clinker grindability using drop-weight
testing. Minerals Engineering 12 (1), 43–50.
tests and its relation to tube mill performance. Zement-Kalk-Gips 11, 577–584.
Theisen, K., 1993. Estimation of cement clinker grindability. In: Proceedings of the
Austin, L.G., Klimpel, R.R., Luckie, P.T., 1984. Process Engineering of Size Reduction:
Fifteenth International Conference on Cement Microscopy, International
Ball Milling. AIME Publ., NY.
Cement Microscopy Association, Duncanville, Texas, pp. 1–14.
Bond, F.C., 1960. Crushing and grinding calculations. British Chemical Engineering 6,
Tokyay, M., 1999. Effect of chemical composition of clinker on grinding energy
378–391. 543–548.
requirement. Cement and Concrete Research 29, 532–535.
Duda, W.H., 1985. Cement-Data-Book, International Process Engineering in the
Weedon, D.M., 2001. A perfect matrix model for ball mills. Minerals Engineering 14
Cement Industry, French & European Publication. third ed. 1, 656, ISBN:
(10), 1225–1236.
0828802041.
Weedon, D.M., Wilson, F., 2000. Modelling iron ore degradation using a twin
Gável, V., Opoczky, L., Sas, Lászlò, 2006. Correlations of grindability, chemical–
pendulum breakage device. International Journal of Mineral Processing 59,
mineral composition and texture of cement clinker. XIth European Symposium
195–213.
on Comminution, Budapest, Hungary 24.
Zeisel, H.G., 1953. Schriftenreihe der Zementindustrie, VDZ e.v., Düsseldorf. Heft 14,
Genc, O., Ergun, L., Benzer, H., 2004. Single particle breakage characterization of
pp. 51.
materials by drop weight testing. XLI Annual Symposium Physicochemical
Zhang, Y.M., 1992. Simulation of comminution and classification in cement
Problems of Mineral Processing and IX International Mineral Processing
manufacture. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mining and Metallurgical
Meeting, Poland 38, 241–255.
Engineering, The University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Kapur, P.C., Pande, D., Fuerstenau, D.W., 1996. Analysis of single-particle breakage
Zhang, Y.M., Napier-Munn, T.J., Kavetsky, A., 1988. Application of comminution and
by impact grinding. International Journal of Mineral Processing 49, 223–236.
classification modelling to grinding of cement clinker. Trans IMM 97, C207–
Leung, K., 1987. An energy-based ore specific model for autogeneous and semi-
C214.
autogeneous grinding. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Man, Y.T., 2001. Model-based procedure for scale-up of wet, overflow ball mills. Part
I: Outline of the methodology. Minerals Engineering 14 (10), 1237–1246.