Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Minerals Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng

Single particle impact breakage characteristics of clinkers related to mineral


composition and grindability
Ö. Genç a,*, A.H. Benzer b
a
Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, The University of Queensland, 40, Isles Road, Indooroopilly Brisbane Qld 4072, Australia
b
Hacettepe University, Department of Mining Engineering, Beytepe 06800, Ankara, Turkey

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Single particle impact breakage characteristics of clinkers from different plants were determined by the
Received 13 March 2009 drop-weight technique. Impact breakage distribution parameter (t10) defined by Narayanan [Narayanan,
Accepted 6 June 2009 S.S., Whiten, W.J., 1983. Breakage characteristics for ores for ball mill modelling. In: Proceeding of the
Available online 13 August 2009
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 286, pp. 31–39.] was used to characterise the break-
age distributions of different clinkers based on the specific comminution energy. The single particle
Keywords: impact breakage resistance parameter as represented by A  b [Man, Y.T., 2000. A model based scale-up
Comminution
procedure for wet, overflow ball mills. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mining, Minerals and Materials Engi-
Crushing
Sizing
neering, The University of Queensland] based on the model parameters of the well known Ecst10 rela-
Particle size tionship given by Leung [Leung, K., 1987. An energy-based ore specific model for autogeneous and
semi-autogeneous grinding. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland, JKMRC] was correlated with
the standard bond index number, belite and alite mineral amounts.
Ó 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1. Introduction extent by raw material preparation, grinding, pyro-processing,


cooling rate and even cooler type, grindability is expected to vary
Grinding of raw material and clinker represents approximately in different plants. Several investigations have been carried out to
65% of the total electrical energy consumption in a cement plant develop relationships between grindability and the physico-
and 40% of the total is used in clinker grinding stage. This high chemical characteristics which affect the grindability at the pro-
power consumption is both due to the fine size required for the duction stage (Duda, 1985; Theisen, 1993; Tokyay, 1999; Altun,
product and to the mill feed breakage characteristics. The mill 1998, 1999).
feed breakage characteristics are measured by a grindability in- Impact tests such as drop weight or twin pendulum have
dex that measures the ability of clinker to resist grinding. Differ- found wide application in direct measurement of breakage char-
ent definitions and corresponding measuring methods have been acteristics of various minerals (Narayanan and Whiten, 1983;
reported for grindability (Tokyay, 1999). The most commonly ap- Narayanan 1985; Andersen, 1988; Leung, 1987; Napier-Munn
plied methods in the cement industry are due to Bond (Bond, et al., 1996; Tavares, 1999; Weedon and Wilson, 2000; Weedon,
1960) and Zeisel (Zeisel, 1953). Primary purpose in determining 2001; Man, 2001). Such tests quantify material resistance to im-
Bond or Zeisel index is to assess the grinding equipment effi- pact breakage based on the data from single particle breakage
ciency. Based on grindability tests performed according to Bond tests using different feed sizes. Specific comminution energy-t10
and Zeisel methods, clinkers categorized as ‘‘hard” or ‘‘easy” were model proposed based on the single particle breakage test results
found to have typical chemical–mineral composition and texture is given in Eq. (1).
(Gável et al., 2006). Among the clinker minerals, alite
(C3 S ¼ 3CaO  SiO2 ) and belite (C2 S ¼ 2CaO  SiO2 ) minerals are t10 ¼ Að1  ebEcs Þ ð1Þ
known as providing strength whereas tricalcium aluminate
In this equation the impact breakage distribution parameter or
(C3 A ¼ 3CaO  Al2 O3 ), tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C4 AF ¼ 4CaO
breakage index is denoted by t10 which quantifies the amount of
Al2 O3  Fe2 O3 ) are the flux minerals. The relative proportions of
material passing 1/10th of the original size, Ecs is the specific com-
these compounds as well as their macro and microstructural
minution energy (kW h/t), A and b are impact breakage parame-
arrangement (texture) predominantly determine the clinker grin-
ters. The value of A  b indicates the ease of impact breakage
dability. Since mineral contents and texture are affected to a great
(Napier-Munn et al., 1996) with higher values indicating more
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 7 3878 4353; fax: +61 733655999. breakage occurring for a given energy input. Although numerous
E-mail address: o.genc@uq.edu.au (Ö. Genç). investigators (Austin et al., 1984; Asim, 1984; Zhang et al., 1988;

0892-6875/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.


doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2009.06.001
Ö. Genç, A.H. Benzer / Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165 1161

Zhang, 1992) have investigated the single particle impact breakage Table 1
characteristics of clinkers, a detailed study that demonstrates the Drop-weight test characteristics.

breakage distributions of clinkers with different mineral composi- Samples Energy levels (kW h/t)
tions is still lacking. Clinker-1 2.79, 3.32, 4.82
The study aimed to investigate the breakage distributions of dif- Clinker-2 3.15, 3.95, 4.94
ferent clinkers on the basis of energy level and establish the rela- Clinker-3 2.42, 2.67, 4.25
tionships between single particle impact breakage resistance Clinker-4 2.86, 3.32, 4.14
Clinker-5 1.00, 2.08, 3.05
parameter A  b, standard bond work index number, alite and belite Clinker-6 1.16, 2.01, 3.01
mineral amounts of different clinkers. It was demonstrated that, Clinker-7 1.07, 2.03, 3.17
clinkers with similar elemental composition constitute different Clinker-8 1.08, 2.11, 3.15, 4.25
mineral proportions and grindabilities. Clinker-9 1.07, 2.09, 3.14, 4.23

2. Breakage tests
Clinker-1
Drop-weight apparatus used in this study is shown in Fig. 1 100
with its design characteristics. Breakage set-up test specifications
were reported by Genc et al. (2004). Table 1 summarizes the en-

Cumulative Passing %
ergy levels studied on each sample. Clinkers provided from nine
different cement plants were used in the tests. Samples were dry
sieved to the size fraction of 9.5 + 8.0 mm and on the average
90 particles were broken at each energy level to characterise the 10
breakage distributions.
Product size distributions resulting from the breakage of 2.79 kWh/t
9.5 + 8.0 mm sized particles at different impact energy levels 3.32 kWh/t
were determined by dry sieving and the 50% passing size (d50) of
4.82 kWh/t
each distribution was determined. Size normalized cumulative
passing distributions of breakage products were constructed on 1
the basis of specific impact energy in which the particle size is re- 0.10 1.00 10.00
scaled by the median size (d50) of the breakage products indicating d/d50
the similarity of breakage distributions independent of particle
Fig. 2. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-1.
size.
Size normalized distributions of each test fraction at different
specific comminution energy levels were found not to coincide Clinker-2
on a single distribution indicating that, energy level has an effect 100
on breakage patterns of each size. Non-self similar breakage size
distributions resulted at an energy level of 1 kW h/t were attrib-
Cumulative Passing %

uted to the occurrence of limited rebreakage events particularly


at low impact energies at single impact modes as reported by Ka-
pur et al. (1996). Plots given in Figs. 2–10 indicated that, different
clinkers exhibit a self-similar distribution at energy levels higher 10
than 1 kW h/t however the consistency of the observed trend
slightly deviates for clinker-8. 3.15 kWh/t
3.95 kWh/t
Ø=65cm 4.94 kWh/t
1
0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50
6
Fig. 3. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-2.

7
h=107. 5cm

5 2.1. Ecs–t10 models


1
Drop-weight data analysis was done based on the well known
2
3 approach given by Narayanan and Whiten (1983). The resulting
4 Ecst10 relations are shown in Fig. 11. At a constant specific com-
minution energy level, increase in t10 values of different clinkers
Ø=15. 5cm resulted in a decreased resistance to breakage, or less power
requirement to break that clinker type to achieve the same prod-
1.Electromagnetic head 5.Ruler for drop-height adjustment uct fineness. Breakage distributions of particles in the size range
2.5.870 kg lead fixed head mass 6.Mechanical arm of 9.5 + 8.0 mm were used to determine A and b impact break-
3.Steel anvil (Diameter:15.5cm) 7.Drop-weight rail age parameters to characterise breakage resistance. The Ecst10
relation given in Eq. (1) was fitted to the experimental data. Mod-
4.Steel base
el fitting results are shown in Fig. 11 as lines and compared
Fig. 1. Photograph of the drop-weight apparatus. through R-squared values in Table 2.
1162 Ö. Genç, A.H. Benzer / Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165

Clinker-3 Clinker-6
100 100

Cumulative Passing %
Cumulative Passing %

10 10

2.42 kWh/t 1.16 kWh/t


2.67 kWh/t 2.01 kWh/t

4.25 kWh/t 3.01kWh/t

1 1
0.10 1.00 10.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50 d/d50

Fig. 4. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-3. Fig. 7. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-6.

Clinker-4 Clinker-7
100 100
Cumulative Passing %

Cumulative Passing %
10 10

2.86 kWh/t
1.07 kWh/t
3.32 kWh/t
2.03 kWh/t
4.14 kWh/t 3.17 kWh/t
1
1
0.10 1.00 10.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50
d/d50
Fig. 5. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-4.
Fig. 8. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-7.

Clinker-5
100 Clinker-8
100
Cumulative Passing %

Cumulative Passing %

10
10

1.00 kWh/t 1.08 kWh/t


2.08 kWh/t 2.11 kWh/t
3.05 kWh/t 3.15 kWh/t
4.25 kWh/t
1
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 1
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50
d/d50
Fig. 6. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-5.
Fig. 9. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-8.

3. Comparison of impact breakage with clinker composition


Breakage test results indicated that, Ecst10 relations (Fig. 11)
The chemical and mineralogical compositions of the test clink- established on the basis of breakage distributions of 9.5 +
ers determined by X-ray diffraction analysis are listed in Table 3. 8.0 mm particles at different impact energies were found to be dif-
Differences in the chemical compositions of the test clinkers are ferent for each test clinker. The breakage tests showed that differ-
found to be not significant whereas the differences in mineralogi- ent clinkers had different hardnesses. The differences can be
cal compositions do very significantly. attributed to the differences in the amounts of minerals which im-
Ö. Genç, A.H. Benzer / Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165 1163

Clinker-9 resulted no meaningful correlation with the parameter A  b. Non-


100 linear regression analysis to predict A  b from C2S% and C3S% re-
sulted the correlation given in Eq. (3) with a standard deviation
of 7.00.
Cumulative Passing %

A  b ¼ 333  5:8  ðC2 S%Þ  3:4  ðC3 S%Þ ð2Þ


Regression results to predict A  b from C2S% and C3S% resulted
10 the correlations in Eqs. (3) and (4) with standard deviations of
8.55 and 9.79, respectively.
1.07 kWh/t
2.09 kWh/t A  b ¼ 64  1:57  ðC2 S%Þ ð3Þ
3.14 kWh/t A  b ¼ 24 þ 1:08  ðC3 S%Þ ð4Þ
4.23 kWh/t

1 4. Bond grinding tests


0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
d/d50 Correlations between Standard Bond work index and strength
giving mineral amounts are investigated for clinker-5, clinker-6,
Fig. 10. Impact breakage pattern of clinker-9.
clinker-7, clinker-8 and clinker-9. Standard Bond tests were carried
out using a 90 lm test sieve (Bond,1960). Mineral proportions and
part strength. In this context, impact breakage results were com- bond index values for those five clinker samples are tabulated in
pared with the strength giving mineral per cent amounts of clink- Table 4. Established correlations are given in Figs. 14 and 15. Due
ers namely alite (C3S%) and belite (C2S%). The silicate structures, to the limited number of data set satisfactory results could not
alite (C3S) and belite (C2S) are known to be the most prominent have been obtained although the trends for both relations (Wi–
strength giving components in all clinker compositions (Duda, C2S% and Wi–C3S%) are meaningful such that, increase in belite
1985). content resulted an increase in work index number whereas in-
As given in Table 2, with the highest A  b value clinker-2 was crease in alite content lead to a decrease in work index number.
determined to show the lowest resistance to impact breakage
whereas clinker-9 is the hardest sample to be broken. Regression 5. Conclusions
analysis showed that, impact hardness index (A  b) has a relation
both with belite (C2S) and alite (C3S) amounts as presented in Figs. Experimental data demonstrated that, the technique described
12 and 13. Results indicated that, resistance of clinker to impact is a potential means to efficiently estimate the resistance of clinker
breakage increases as C2S amount increases and decreases as C3S mill feeds to impact breakage on the basis of alite and belite min-
amount increases. Flux minerals of clinkers namely C3A and C4AF eral contents. Test results have proven that, alite and belite

Clinker-1 (exp)
80
Clinker-2 (exp)

70 Clinker-3 (exp)
Clinker-4 (exp)
60 Clinker-5 (exp)
Clinker-6 (exp)
50 Clinker-7 (exp)
t10 (%)

Clinker-8 (exp)
40
Clinker-9 (exp)

30 Clinker-1 (t10 model fit)


Clinker-2 (t10 model fit)
20 Clinker-3 (t10 model fit)
Clinker-4 (t10 model fit)
10 Clinker-5 (t10 model fit)
Clinker-6 (t10 model fit)
0
Clinker-7 (t10 model fit)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Clinker-8 (t10 model fit)
Specific Breakage Energy (kWh/t)
Clinker-9 (t10 model fit)

Fig. 11. Ecst10 relationships for 9.5 + 8.0 mm size fraction of different clinkers.

Table 2
Size-specific impact breakage parameters for different clinkers.

Size fraction (mm) Impact parameter Clinker-1 Clinker-2 Clinker-3 Clinker-4 Clinker-5 Clinker-6 Clinker-7 Clinker-8 Clinker-9
9.5 + 8.0 Ab 52.88 56.74 38.65 45.93 24.68 43.94 27.70 16.33 14.76
R2 0.999 0.999 0.997 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.993 0.977 0.999
1164 Ö. Genç, A.H. Benzer / Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165

Table 3
Chemical and mineralogical compositions of clinkers.

Primary oxides Clinker-1 Clinker-2 Clinker-3 Clinker-4 Clinker-5 Clinker-6 Clinker-7 Clinker-8 Clinker-9
CaO 64.65 66.21 64.79 66.42 63.44 64.49 64.22 65.90 66.95
SiO2 20.40 21.33 21.53 21.60 21.47 21.05 21.03 21.31 20.98
Al2O3 5.76 4.56 5.60 6.40 5.69 5.14 5.46 5.59 5.54
Fe2O3 2.56 3.38 2.90 3.68 4.01 4.12 3.96 3.95 3.79
MgO 2.66 1.31 1.54 0.65 2.42 2.98 2.31 0.88 0.84
K2O 0.94 0.54 0.89 0.43 0.96 0.49 0.94 0.92 0.83
Na2O 0.25 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.38 0.33 0.35 0.26 0.25
SO3 1.76 1.67 1.64 0.6 0.91 1.19 0.85 0.39 0.35
Cl– 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 – 0.005 0.005
LOI 0.44 0.25 0.31 0.10 – 0.15 – – –
Mineral content %
C3S 65.75 71.92 58.32 54.94 48.41 57.75 56.80 52.83 55.13
C2S 8.89 6.90 17.73 18.41 25.13 16.85 17.52 21.24 22.76
C3A 10.93 6.36 9.93 11.68 8.32 6.66 7.77 8.13 8.27
C4AF 7.79 10.28 8.82 10.66 12.19 12.54 12.06 12.01 11.55

80 20
W i =0.4024 (C2 S%)+5.1463
70 18
R 2 =0.7815
60 16

W i (kWh/t)
50 14

12
A.b

40
10
30
8
20 0 10 20 30 40

10 C2S (%)

0 Fig. 14. Correlation between bond work index and C2S%.


0 10 20 30
C2S% 20

18
Fig. 12. Relationship between A  b and C2S%.
16
W i (kWh/t)

14
80
12
70 W i =-0.4099 (C3 S%)+35.685
10
60 R 2 =0.9187
8
50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C3S (%)
A.b

40
Fig. 15. Correlation between bond work index and C3S%.
30

20 amounts could be correlated both with impact breakage parameter


A  b and standard bond work index.
10 The clinkers tested all had similar elemental compositions how-
ever varied in mineral composition and grindability. Potential sav-
0
ings in grinding costs by varying the mineral composition through
0 20 40 60 80
variation in processing conditions and the correlations needs to be
C3S% further investigated.
Fig. 13. Relationship between A  b and C3S%.
Acknowledgments

The financial support to this work from Turkish Scientific and


Table 4
Strength giving mineral amounts and standard bond index values of clinkers. Technical Research Council (Project No: MISAG 190), Prof. A.J.
Lynch and Prof. W.J. Whiten for their valuable discussions, A. Seyfi
Parameter Clinker-5 Clinker-6 Clinker-7 Clinker-8 Clinker-9 _
Erdem who conducted the Bond tests, Aysun Günlü, Ilkay Bengü
C2S% 25.13 16.85 17.52 21.24 22.76 Çelik, Namık A. Aydoğan, Can E. Özer, Serkan Dikmen for their ef-
C3S% 48.41 57.75 56.80 52.83 55.13
fort in sampling and experimental studies are gratefully
Wi (kW h/t) 15.45 11.53 12.45 14.66 13.29
acknowledged.
Ö. Genç, A.H. Benzer / Minerals Engineering 22 (2009) 1160–1165 1165

References Napier-Munn, T.J., Morrell, S., Morrison, R.D., Kojovic T., 1996. Mineral comminution
circuits their operation and optimization. JKMRC, Brisbane, 413.
Narayanan, S.S., 1985. Development of a laboratory single particle breakage
Altun, A., 1998. Microscopic criteria for quality control of clinker. Cement and
technique and its application to ball mill modelling and scale-up. Ph.D.
Concrete World (25), 22–32.
Thesis, The University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Altun, A., 1999. Effects of kiln system on microstructure of clinker. Cement and
Narayanan, S.S., Whiten, W.J. 1983. Breakage characteristics for ores for ball mill
Concrete World (19), 33–41.
modelling. In: Proceeding of the Australasian Institute of Mining and
Andersen, J.S., 1988. Development of a cone crusher model. M.Eng.Sc. Thesis, The
Metallurgy, vol. 286, pp. 31–39.
University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Tavares, L.M., 1999. Energy absorbed in breakage of single particles in drop-weight
Asim, M.E., 1984. Investigations of cement clinker grindability using drop-weight
testing. Minerals Engineering 12 (1), 43–50.
tests and its relation to tube mill performance. Zement-Kalk-Gips 11, 577–584.
Theisen, K., 1993. Estimation of cement clinker grindability. In: Proceedings of the
Austin, L.G., Klimpel, R.R., Luckie, P.T., 1984. Process Engineering of Size Reduction:
Fifteenth International Conference on Cement Microscopy, International
Ball Milling. AIME Publ., NY.
Cement Microscopy Association, Duncanville, Texas, pp. 1–14.
Bond, F.C., 1960. Crushing and grinding calculations. British Chemical Engineering 6,
Tokyay, M., 1999. Effect of chemical composition of clinker on grinding energy
378–391. 543–548.
requirement. Cement and Concrete Research 29, 532–535.
Duda, W.H., 1985. Cement-Data-Book, International Process Engineering in the
Weedon, D.M., 2001. A perfect matrix model for ball mills. Minerals Engineering 14
Cement Industry, French & European Publication. third ed. 1, 656, ISBN:
(10), 1225–1236.
0828802041.
Weedon, D.M., Wilson, F., 2000. Modelling iron ore degradation using a twin
Gável, V., Opoczky, L., Sas, Lászlò, 2006. Correlations of grindability, chemical–
pendulum breakage device. International Journal of Mineral Processing 59,
mineral composition and texture of cement clinker. XIth European Symposium
195–213.
on Comminution, Budapest, Hungary 24.
Zeisel, H.G., 1953. Schriftenreihe der Zementindustrie, VDZ e.v., Düsseldorf. Heft 14,
Genc, O., Ergun, L., Benzer, H., 2004. Single particle breakage characterization of
pp. 51.
materials by drop weight testing. XLI Annual Symposium Physicochemical
Zhang, Y.M., 1992. Simulation of comminution and classification in cement
Problems of Mineral Processing and IX International Mineral Processing
manufacture. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mining and Metallurgical
Meeting, Poland 38, 241–255.
Engineering, The University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Kapur, P.C., Pande, D., Fuerstenau, D.W., 1996. Analysis of single-particle breakage
Zhang, Y.M., Napier-Munn, T.J., Kavetsky, A., 1988. Application of comminution and
by impact grinding. International Journal of Mineral Processing 49, 223–236.
classification modelling to grinding of cement clinker. Trans IMM 97, C207–
Leung, K., 1987. An energy-based ore specific model for autogeneous and semi-
C214.
autogeneous grinding. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland, JKMRC.
Man, Y.T., 2001. Model-based procedure for scale-up of wet, overflow ball mills. Part
I: Outline of the methodology. Minerals Engineering 14 (10), 1237–1246.

Potrebbero piacerti anche