Charting Outcomes in The Match 2018 Seniors PDF

Charting Outcomes in the Match:
U.S. Allopathic Seniors

Characteristics of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Matched to Their
Preferred Specialty in the 2018 Main Residency Match
2nd Edition
Prepared by:
National Resident Matching Program
www.nrmp.org
July 2018
Questions about the contents of this publication may be directed to Mei Liang, Director of Research,
National Resident Matching Program, (202) 400-2233 or datarequest@nrmp.org.
Questions about the NRMP should be directed to Mona M. Signer, President and CEO, National
Resident Matching Program, (202) 400-2233 or admin@nrmp.org.
Copyright ©2018 National Resident Matching Program, 2121 K Street, NW, Suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20037 USA. All rights reserved. Permission to use, copy and/or distribute any
documentation and/or related images from this publication shall be expressly obtained from the
NRMP
National Resident Matching Program, Charting Outcomes in the Match: U.S. Allopathic Seniors,
2018. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC 2018.
2018 Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... ii
Tables and Charts for All Specialties
Chart 1. Active Applicants in the 2018 Main Residency Match ............................................................... 2
Table 1. Number of Applicants and Positions in the 2018 Main Residency Match ................................. 3
Chart 2. Ratio of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Ranking Specialty First / Available Positions ........................ 4
Chart 3. Match Rates of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ..................................................................................... 5
Table 2. Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors .......................................................................... 6
Chart 4. Median Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors............................................. 7
Chart 5. Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ............................... 8
Chart 6. USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ..................................................................... 9
Chart 7. USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ............................................................. 10
Chart 8. Mean Number of Research Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ........................................ 11
Chart 9. Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ........ 12
Chart 10. Mean Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ............................................. 13
Chart 11. Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors ....................................... 14
Chart 12. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who are Members of AOA ......................................... 15
Chart 13. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 40 Medical Schools
with the Highest NIH Funding .................................................................................................. 16
Chart 14. Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree ..................................... 17
Tables and Charts for Individual Specialties

Anesthesiology .......................................................................................................................................... 18
Child Neurology ........................................................................................................................................ 27
Dermatology ............................................................................................................................................. 36
Diagnostic Radiology ............................................................................................................................... 45
Emergency Medicine ................................................................................................................................ 54
Family Medicine ....................................................................................................................................... 63
General Surgery ........................................................................................................................................ 72
Internal Medicine ..................................................................................................................................... 81
Internal Medicine/Pediatrics ..................................................................................................................... 90
Interventional Radiology ........................................................................................................................... 99
Neurological Surgery .............................................................................................................................. 108
Neurology .............................................................................................................................................. 117
Obstetrics and Gynecology ..................................................................................................................... 123
Orthopaedic Surgery ............................................................................................................................... 135
Otolaryngology ....................................................................................................................................... 144
Pathology ................................................................................................................................................ 153
Pediatrics ................................................................................................................................................ 162
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation .................................................................................................... 171
Plastic Surgery ........................................................................................................................................ 180
Psychiatry ............................................................................................................................................... 189
Radiation Oncology ................................................................................................................................. 198
Vascular Surgery ..................................................................................................................................... 207
Copyright ©2018 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the i Charting Outcomes in the Match:
written permission of the NRMP.
U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2018
2018 Introduction
Background
The first edition of Charting Outcomes in the Match was published in August 2006 to document how applicant qualifications affect
success in the Main Residency Match®. The report was published biennially between 2007 and 2011 and was a collaboration of the
National Resident Matching Program® (NRMP®) and the Association of American Medical Colleges® (AAMC®). Match outcome data
from the NRMP were combined with applicant characteristics from the AAMC’s Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS®) and
United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®) scores from the AAMC data warehouse. In 2014, NRMP added a Professional
Profile section to its Match registration process to collect USMLE scores and other applicant characteristics and those have been used to
independently publish all subsequent Charting Outcomes in the Match reports.
Prior to 2016, this report examined the Match success of only two applicant groups: senior students from U.S. allopathic medical schools
and independent applicants. Independent applicants included all applicant types other than U.S. seniors: previous graduates of U.S.
allopathic medical schools, students/graduates of osteopathic medical schools, students/graduates of Fifth Pathway programs,
students/graduates of Canadian medical schools, and U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools.
Because independent applicants are a heterogeneous group, a decision was made in 2016 to report data separately for U.S. allopathic
medical school seniors, students/graduates of osteopathic medical schools, U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools,
and non-U.S. citizen students/graduates of international medical schools. In 2018, senior students of osteopathic medical schools are
reported separately, and there is no report for osteopathic medical school graduates because their numbers are so small.
This report examines the characteristics of U.S. allopathic seniors.
Data
Match success, specialty preference, and ranking information were collected through the Main Residency Match. The 40 U.S. medical
schools receiving the highest totals of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants were obtained from the NIH website. Other applicant
characteristics, including USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, academic degrees, publications, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical
Society (AOA) membership, and research, and work and volunteer experiences, were self-reported through the Professional Profile section
of the NRMP’s Applicant Registration Form for the Match. To complete the form, applicants were asked to answer the questions as they
did in their ERAS Common Application Form (CAF). Completion of the form was optional, and applicants who completed the form could
consent or decline to participate in NRMP research. Data collection for the self-reported Professional Profile section was granted
exemption by the Chesapeake (now Advarra) Institutional Review Board (IRB).
A total of 18,818 U.S. allopathic seniors submitted certified rank order lists in the 2018 Main Residency Match. After excluding the 7.0
percent of U.S. allopathic seniors who did not give consent to participate in NRMP research, 17,497 applicants were included in the final
dataset. Missing data were found in Step 1 scores (1.1% missing), Step 2 CK scores (3.1%), number of research experiences (10.1%),
number of abstracts, presentations, and publications (10.2%), number of work experiences (11.7%), number of volunteer experiences
(11.5%), Ph.D. degree (4.7%), other graduate degree (5.2%), and AOA membership (5.9%).
To ensure that USMLE Step scores were not misreported, the NRMP asked medical schools to verify the scores of their U.S. senior
students. In 2018, 95 percent of the Step 1 scores and 96 percent of the Step 2 CK scores used in this report were verified, corrected, or
supplied by U.S. medical schools. Because the self-reported scores are highly accurate (the intracorrelation coefficient (ICC) between the
self-reported scores and school-verified scores was 0.986 (99% CI [0.986, 0.987]) for Step 1 scores and 0.982 (99% CI [0.981, 0.983]) for
Step 2 CK scores), both verified and unverified scores were used to prepare this report.
Methods
Specialties that offered 50 or more positions in the 2018 Main Residency Match are included in this report. Over the years, specialties
have been added to the report, including Otolaryngology and Neurology in 2007, Neurological Surgery in 2009, Child Neurology and
Vascular Surgery in 2014, and Interventional Radiology in 2018. Transitional Year programs were excluded beginning with the 2011
report because they are not viewed as a specialty choice.
Twelve measures are incorporated in this report. Probability analysis using a simple logistic regression model was introduced in 2009 to
evaluate the relationship between Match success and contiguous ranks and USMLE Step 1 scores. Probability analyses in this report used
data on U.S. seniors who participated in the Match in 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Copyright ©2018 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the ii Charting Outcomes in the Match:
2018 Introduction (continued)
It is important to note that for purposes of this report, Match success is defined as a match to the specialty of the applicant’s first-ranked
program, or "preferred specialty," because that is assumed to be the specialty of choice. Lack of success includes matching to another
specialty as well as failure to match at all. No distinction was made based on whether applicants matched to the first, second, third, or
lower choice program.
Summary
Some general observations apply to all specialties in this report. U.S. allopathic seniors who are successful in matching to their preferred
specialty are more likely to:
 Rank more programs within their preferred specialty
 Have higher USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores
 Be members of Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society
Although other measures seem to be related to Match success for some specialties, the relationships are not consistent enough to draw
broad conclusions across specialties. In addition, the data sources used for Charting Outcomes in the Match do not include other
important applicant factors such as course evaluations, reference letters, and the Medical School Performance Evaluation (MSPE).
Despite the fairly strong relationship between USMLE Step scores and Match success, the distributions of scores show that program
directors consider other qualifications. A high score is not a guarantee of success, and a low score is not a bar to success. Even in the
most competitive specialties a few individuals with high scores are not successful. In the less competitive specialties, U.S. seniors with
scores slightly above passing usually match to their preferred specialties. The data also are reassuring because they indicate that at least
some programs do not employ an arbitrary cutoff or decline to consider applicants with less than excellent test performance.
The data in this report support the following straightforward advice one should give to an applicant:
 Rank all of the programs you really want, without regard to your estimate of your chances with those programs.
 Include a mix of both highly competitive and less competitive programs within your preferred specialty.
 Include all of the programs on your list where the program has expressed an interest in you and where you would accept a position.
 If you are applying to a competitive specialty and you want to have a residency position in the event you are unsuccessful in
matching to a program in your preferred specialty, also rank your most preferred programs in an alternate specialty.
 Include all of your qualifications in your application, but know that you do not have to be AOA, have the highest USMLE scores,
have publications, or have participated in research projects to match successfully.
Program directors and applicants will find the tables and charts for the specialty of their particular interest later in this report.
For questions, comments or more information, please contact:

Mei Liang, Director of Research
National Resident Matching Program
2121 K Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20037
Tel: (202) 400-2233
Email: datarequest@nrmp.org
Copyright ©2018 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the iii Charting Outcomes in the Match:
Tables and Charts for All Specialties
Copyright ©2018 NRMP. Reproduction prohibited without the 1 Charting Outcomes in the Match:
Chart Active Applicants in the 2018 Main Residency Match
1 by Applicant Type
Students/Graduates of U.S. Citizen

Osteopathic Medical Students/Graduates of
Schools International Medical
4,617 Schools
5,075
Students/Graduates of
Fifth Pathway
Programs
2
Students/Graduates of
Canadian Medical
Schools Non-U.S. Citizen
13 Students/Graduates
of International
Medical Schools
Seniors of U.S. 7,067
Allopathic Medical
Schools
18,818
Previous Graduates of
U.S. Allopathic
Medical Schools
1,511
Chart 1 shows the number of active applicants (applicants who submitted rank order lists of programs) by
applicant type in the 2018 Main Residency Match. A total of 37,103 active applicants participated in the 2018
Main Residency Match. U.S. allopathic medical school seniors constituted 50.7 percent of the applicants in the
2018 Match. The next largest group were non-U.S. citizen students and graduates of international medical
schools (19.0%). The numbers of Fifth Pathway (n=2) and Canadian graduates (n=13) are small.
Table Number of Applicants and Positions in the 2018 Main Residency Match
1 by Preferred Specialty*
Total Total Number of Number of U.S. Seniors Number of
Positions Number of All Applicants Not U.S. Seniors Per
Preferred Specialty Offered All Applicants Per Position Matched Matched Total Position
Anesthesiology 1,840 2,004 1.09 1,084 45 1,129 0.61

Child Neurology 168 166 0.99 102 1 103 0.61
Dermatology 472 651 1.38 368 83 451 0.96
Diagnostic Radiology 1,099 1,289 1.17 682 85 767 0.70
Emergency Medicine 2,278 2,693 1.18 1,597 151 1,748 0.77
Family Medicine 3,629 4,402 1.21 1,558 77 1,635 0.45
General Surgery 1,319 1,955 1.48 972 185 1,157 0.88
Internal Medicine 7,916 10,032 1.27 3,333 73 3,406 0.43
Internal Medicine/Pediatrics 382 439 1.15 301 21 322 0.84
Interventional Radiology 136 253 1.86 120 86 206 1.51
Neurological Surgery 225 310 1.38 203 32 235 1.04
Neurology 859 1,070 1.25 466 21 487 0.57
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1,336 1,745 1.31 1,050 145 1,195 0.89
Orthopaedic Surgery 742 987 1.33 691 148 839 1.13
Otolaryngology 315 329 1.04 284 13 297 0.94
Pathology 601 692 1.15 216 8 224 0.37
Pediatrics 2,858 3,059 1.07 1,748 21 1,769 0.62
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 421 579 1.38 239 33 272 0.65
Plastic Surgery 168 222 1.32 156 26 182 1.08
Psychiatry 1,556 2,383 1.53 965 184 1,149 0.74
Radiation Oncology 194 215 1.11 176 14 190 0.98
Vascular Surgery 60 77 1.28 48 5 53 0.88
* Preferred specialty is the specialty of the first-ranked program on an applicant's rank order list, excluding preliminary programs in specialties.
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse.
Table 1 provides a summary of the numbers of positions for selected specialties and the numbers of all applicants and
U.S. allopathic seniors who preferred each specialty. For example, a total of 2,004 applicants preferred Anesthesiology
(or ranked an Anesthesiology position first), among whom 1,129 were U.S. allopathic seniors (1,084 matched and 45 not
matched to Anesthesiology). For each of the 1,840 Anesthesiology positions there were 1.09 applicants who preferred the
specialty, including 0.61 U.S. allopathic seniors.
Only those specialties offering 50 or more positions are included. For those specialties offering both PGY-1 and PGY-2
positions (including Physician (R) positions), all position types have been combined.
Chart Ratio of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Ranking Specialty First / Available
2 Positions
by Preferred Specialty
2.5
All Other Applicants U.S. Seniors
2.0
0.35
1.5
0.61 1.51 0.79
0.42 0.33 0.20 0.73 0.24
0.84 0.68 0.41 0.40
1.0 0.48 0.47 0.41 0.76 0.31 1.13 0.78 0.13
1.04 0.10 0.45 1.08
0.38 0.96 0.94 0.98
0.88 0.84 0.89 0.88
0.77 0.74
0.70
0.5 0.61 0.61 0.57 0.62 0.65
0.45 0.43 0.37
0.0
Su n
ne gy
a b ics
Su y
y
ry ery
N logy
gn erm ogy
ge ad y
ne
ry
cs
al logy
eu ry
Ps ery
try
Fa Me gy
Su y
M ne
Pa ogy
Pe ogy
tio Ped e
er
g
ar log
R og
tio
in
e
ge
tri
lo
lo
lo
ia
er dici
ci
eh iatr
c
rg
rg
rg
g
as ilita
l
ol
ol
ol
ro
co
hi esio
ro
ia
o
io
co
di
tio ch
r
r
ed
er S u
Su
at
di
ng
th
d
e
eu
n
y
a
In edi l M
O
h
c
l
tic
N
rth Gy
a
st
ily
di
y
la
/
n
a
ic
ul
ne
Em tic
eu al
nc
ld
D
e
ae
n
to
m
sc
en
d
An
os
ci
lo
Pl
O
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
nt
G
ro
ad
an
er
en
I
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse
Chart 2 shows the ratios of U.S. allopathic seniors and all applicants who preferred each specialty to available positions in
that specialty. All specialties except Interventional Radiology, Neurological Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, and Plastic
Surgery have enough positions to accommodate all U.S. seniors who preferred that specialty. The ratio was lowest for
Pathology, Family Medicine, and Internal Medicine.
Chart Match Rates of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
3 Percent Matched by Preferred Specialty
100
99.0 97.9 98.8
96.0 95.3 93.5 95.7 95.6 96.4
92.6 90.6
88.9 91.4 86.4 87.9 87.9 85.7
80 84.0 82.4 84.0
81.6
60
58.3
40
20
ne gy
y
Fa Me y
M ne
rn Inte l Su e
ed e
eu ry
gy
gy
gy
l S gy
gy
ry ery
ry
ab cs
Ps ery
Su y
y
Su n
og
er
eu al R tric
og
er
in
in
io
ge
at
eh atri
o
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
i
ic
ic
ne dic
as litat
rg
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
io
lo adio
ro
ro
ia
co
sc nco
ur
d
ed
u
di
th
at
ng
i
e
es
d
eu
y
a
Pe
gn erm
Pa
O
th
/P
tic
ar
N
N
ca
a
rth Gy
di
ily
al
y
la
es
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
gi
ae
rn
to
m
R
en
n
An
d
hi
os
ci
Pl
ge
O
tio
an
ia
op
d
C
Va
i
G
ro
d
an
ad
er
en
e
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
In
bs
ed
te
O
In
M
al
ic
ys
Ph
Chart 3 shows the percentages of U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialty. Overall, 91.8 percent of U.S.
seniors matched to their preferred specialty, ranging from a high of 99.0 percent (Child Neurology) to a low of 58.3 percent
(Interventional Radiology).
Table Summary Statistics on U.S. Allopathic Seniors
2 All Specialties Combined
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=15,451) (n=1,336)
1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 12.3 5.3

2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.2 1.6
3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 233 224
4. Mean USMLE Step 2 CK score 246 236
5. Mean number of research experiences 3.2 3.3
6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 5.7 5.0
7. Mean number of work experiences 3.2 3.3
8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 7.3 6.6
9. Percentage who are AOA members 17.0 6.4
10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical schools 31.9 22.5
with the highest NIH funding
11. Percentage who have Ph.D. degree 4.0 2.9
12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 17.2 21.9
Sources. NRMP Data Warehouse; Top 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding in measure 10 is from the NIH website
(http://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm).
Table 2 provides summary statistics for all specialties by Match outcome on the 12 measures presented in this report.
Data on each of these measures are displayed graphically by preferred specialty on the following pages. Only U.S.
allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included in this table and the rest of the
report.
Chart Median Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
4 by Preferred Specialty and Match Status
20 Matched Not Matched
18
17
15
15
14 14 14
13 13 13 13 13
12 12 12 12 12
10 11 11 11
10
9
8 8
5 6 6 6 6 6
5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 3 3
2 2 2
0 1
a b cs
e
ad s
ec y
ry ery
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
F a Me y
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
er
eu al R tric
og
og
og
g
er
og
in
io
in
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ic
as litat
ne dic
rg
g
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
ia
ro
co
ro
di
io
ur
ur
ur
ed
di
si
di
ng
th
at
e
eu
n
i
y
he
M
a
gn erm
Pa
O
n
/P
R
c
al
tic
ar
N
rth Gy
ca
st
ily
di
y
al
la
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
D
e
ae
gi
n
o
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
er
t
os
ci
ge
lo
Pl
O
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
i
t
G
ro
ed
n
ad
an
er
en
I
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
In general, applicants are more likely to be successful if they rank more programs in their desired specialty. To quantify this
aspect of applicant behavior, we tallied the number of programs ranked in the first-choice specialty before a program in
another specialty appeared on the applicant's rank order list (contiguous ranks).
Chart 4 displays the median number of contiguous ranks by preferred specialty for U.S. allopathic seniors who matched and
did not match to their preferred specialty. The chart shows considerable variation across the specialties for U.S. seniors.
Vascular Surgery had the longest average contiguous rank list (18) for matched U.S. seniors and Interventional Radiology had
the shortest (4). For all specialties, U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialty had median contiguous rank lists that
were longer than those of U.S. seniors who did not match.
The principal message of this chart is that applicants with longer rank order lists are more successful than those with shorter
ones. The NRMP has been recommending longer lists for many years, but some applicants apparently do not heed the advice.
Others may have shorter lists because they found only a few programs willing to entertain their applications or because they
could not afford a large number of interview trips.
Chart Mean Number of Different Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors
3.0 Matched Not Matched
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
a b cs
ne
ad s
ne gy
ry ery
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
Su y
gy
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
er
eu al R tric
g
og
og
og
g
er
io
n
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ci
ci
as litat
rg
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
a
di
ro
co
ro
di
io
co
go
ur
ed
di
si
di
th
at
e
eu
n
i
n
y
he
M
M
a
gn erm
Pa
O
en e/P
R
c
al
tic
ar
N
N
ca
rth Gy
st
ily
di
y
al
la
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
D
e
ae
gi
rn
to
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
os
i
ge
lo
Pl
O
e
c
Fa
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
i
t
G
ro
ed
n
ad
an
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Some applicants are interested in a single specialty while others consider two or more. Chart 5 displays the average number
of different specialties ranked by preferred specialty and Match outcome. For all specialties except Child Neurology, U.S.
allopathic seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty had a higher mean number of different specialties ranked.
Chart USMLE Step 1 Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
Matched Not Matched
270
260
250
240
230
220
210
200
190
180
a b cs
rn Inte l Su e
In edic Me y
ec y
ry ery
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
F a Me y
M ne
l S gy
eu ry
Su y
gy
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
er
ric
og
og
og
g
er
og
io
in
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ci
as litat
ic
rg
rg
rg
rg
t
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
ia
di
ro
co
ro
go
di
lo adio
ur
d
i
si
di
th
at
d
e
eu
n
i
n
y
he
e
a
gn erm
Pa
O
n
en e/P
R
lR
tic
ar
N
N
a
ca
rth Gy
st
ily
di
y
al
la
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
na
D
e
ae
gi
rn
to
m
in
R
en
sc
d
An
hi
os
ge
Pl
O
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
G
ro
ad
an
er
eu
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph

USMLE Step 1 scores are a measure of a student’s understanding of important basic science concepts and the ability to apply
that knowledge to the practice of medicine. Although such knowledge is only one facet of applicant qualifications considered
by program directors in their selection process, a Step 1 score is the only qualification that is universally available for all
applicants during the interview season and prior to the NRMP’s ranking deadline. Overall, U.S. allopathic seniors who
matched to their preferred specialty have mean USMLE Step 1 scores of 232.8 (s.d. = 17.5) well above the 2018 minimum
passing score of 194. Step 1 scores were available for 99 percent of U.S. seniors who gave consent to research.
Chart 6 displays the Step 1 scores for U.S. allopathic seniors by specialty and match status. The horizontal bars are the
median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges (IQR, the range of scores for
applicants excluding the top and bottom quarters of the distribution). Scores generally are higher for the more competitive
specialties, but there is substantial overlap when specialties are compared.
Across all specialties, the IQR of U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialties was higher than those who did not
match.
Chart USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
Matched Not Matched
270
260
250
240
230
220
210
200
190
180
a b cs
Su e
ne gy
ry ery
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
F a Me y
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
gy
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
er
eu al R tric
og
g
og
og
er
og
in
io
in
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
o
lo
lo
ci
ic
as litat
ic
rg
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
a
ro
sc nco
ro
di
co
o
ur
ed
ed
i
si
di
ng
th
at
di
d
eu
y
he
M
a
a
gn erm
Pa
O
en e/P
R
c
al
ar
tic
N
N
ca
rth Gy
st
ily
di
y
al
la
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
D
e
ae
gi
rn
to
m
R
en
d
An
hi
os
ci
ge
lo
Pl
O
e
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
di
t
G
ro
n
ad
an
er
e
I
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph

USMLE Step 2 CK scores are a measure of an applicant's ability to apply the medical knowledge, skills, and
understanding of clinical science essential for providing patient care. Overall, U.S. allopathic seniors who matched to their
preferred specialty had mean USMLE Step 2 CK scores of 245.6 (s.d. = 15.0) well above the 2018 minimum passing score
of 209. Step 2 CK scores were available for 97 percent of U.S. seniors who gave consent to research.
Chart 7 shows the Step 2 CK scores for U.S. seniors by preferred specialty and match status. The horizontal bars are the
median values for successful applicants and the vertical lines show the interquartile ranges. As was the case for the Step 1
scores, the more competitive specialties have higher average Step 2 CK scores, but the overall variation is smaller.
Across all specialties, the IQR of U.S. seniors who matched to their preferred specialties was higher than those who did
not match.
Chart Mean Number of Research Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
6.0
6.1
5.4
5.3
5.0
5.2
5.2
5.1
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.4
4.4
4.0
4.2
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.1
1.0
0.0
a b cs
e
ad s
ne gy
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
F a Me y
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
gy
gy
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
ar ge r
er
eu al R tric
og
og
g
er
og
in
io
n
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ci
ic
as litat
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
a
ro
co
o
di
di
io
co
go
ur
ur
ed
rn Inte l Su
di
si
ge ad i
i
r
h
at
e
eu
n
i
yn
y
t
he
M
gn erm
Pa
O
en e/P
R
tic
ar
N
N
a
ca
rth Gy
st
ily
di
y
al
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
ol
D
e
ae
gi
rn
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
t
os
lo
Pl
O
ic
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
G
ro
ed
ad
an
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Applicants were asked to report the number of research experiences entered in their Electronic Residency Application
Service (ERAS) applications. The experiences are not verified or evaluated and quality may vary greatly. Chart 8 shows the
average number of research experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. U.S. seniors averaged 3.3 research
experiences, with 84.9 percent reporting this information. For all specialties except Family Medicine, matched U.S. seniors
had more or equal numbers of research experiences on average.
Chart Mean Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S.
9 Allopathic Seniors
by Preferred Specialty and Match Status
20.0
18.3
16.0
15.6
14.9
14.7
14.2
12.0
12.2
11.5
10.4
8.0
8.9
8.6
8.4
8.3
7.3
7.3
6.8
6.7
6.7
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.0
5.3
5.1
4.0
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.5
4.2
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.7
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.6
2.3
0.0
n
gy
Su y
y
y
gy
ne
gy
a b ics
F a Me y
Ps ery
ry
ne
eu al R trics
Su y
gy
ed e
Pe gy
og
er
og
er
g
er
g
og
er
io
in
at
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ci
as itat
ic
rg
rg
rg
rg
rg
at
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
o
co
ro
di
io
ia
di
co
go
d
Su
Su
Su
si
di
di
ur
at
th
ad
e
il
eu
n
ne
y
n
he
M
a
M
m
Pa
e
O
ry
en e/P
R
tic
al
ar
l
N
N
ca
rth Gy
er
eh
st
ily
di
y
al
la
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
D
e
gi
ae
rn
to
m
sc
en
d
An
hi
os
ci
lo
ge
Pl
O
te
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
i
G
ro
ed
gn
In
ad
an
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Applicants were asked to list the number of abstracts, presentations, and publications they reported in their ERAS
applications. This information is self-reported and may include peer-reviewed articles, abstracts, poster sessions, and invited
national or regional presentations. Some residency programs may independently verify and even review publications for
applicants in whom they have an interest, but most probably do not.
Many applicants report abstracts, presentations, or publications, sometimes dozens or even hundreds. In the individual
specialty sections, we distinguish between no publications, 1 to 5 publications, and more than 5 publications. Chart 9 shows
the average number of publications by preferred specialty and Match outcome.
U.S. seniors averaged 5.8 publications, with 78.0 percent reporting this information. Matched U.S. seniors had a higher
mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications in all specialties but Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, Neurology,
Pathology, and Plastic Surgery.
Chart Mean Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
6.8
6.0
5.0
4.8
4.0
4.2
4.1
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
a b cs
e
ad s
ne gy
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
F a Me y
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
gy
gy
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
ar ge r
er
eu al R tric
og
og
g
er
og
in
io
n
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ci
ic
as litat
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
a
ro
co
o
di
di
io
co
go
ur
ur
ed
rn Inte l Su
di
si
ge ad i
i
r
h
at
e
eu
n
i
yn
y
t
he
M
gn erm
Pa
O
en e/P
R
tic
ar
N
N
a
rth Gy
ca
st
ily
di
y
al
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
ol
D
e
ae
gi
rn
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
t
os
lo
Pl
O
ic
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
G
ro
ed
ad
an
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph

Applicants were asked to list the number of work experiences they reported in their ERAS applications. Chart 10 shows the
average number of work experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. There is little variation across specialties or
within specialties (matched or not matched) for the U.S. seniors. Three-quarters (81.5%) of U.S. seniors reported work
experiences, with an average of 3.2 work experiences for all U.S. seniors. Differences in mean number of work experiences
are small in most specialties.
Chart Mean Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
9.1
8.7
8.5
8.0
8.3
8.1
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.0
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.4
4.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
a b cs
e
ad s
ne gy
Su n
Su y
y
y
gy
F a Me y
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
gy
gy
Pe gy
Ps ery
ry
ar ge r
er
eu al R tric
og
og
g
er
og
in
io
in
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ic
as litat
c
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
ia
ro
co
o
di
di
io
co
go
ur
ur
ed
rn Inte l Su
di
si
di
r
h
t
e
a
eu
n
i
yn
y
t
he
M
a
gn erm
Pa
O
en e/P
R
tic
ar
N
N
a
ca
rth Gy
st
ily
di
y
al
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
ol
D
e
ae
gi
rn
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
t
os
i
ge
lo
Pl
O
ic
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
G
ro
ed
ad
an
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Applicants were asked to list the number of volunteer experiences they reported in their ERAS applications. Chart 11 displays
the average number of volunteer experiences by preferred specialty and Match outcome. Matched U.S. seniors in most
specialties averaged more volunteer experiences when compared to unmatched seniors in the same specialties, with several
averaging at least one more experience. U.S. seniors averaged 7.2 volunteer experiences, with 87.9 percent reporting at least
one experience.
Chart Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Are Members of AOA
Matched Not Matched

100
80
60
49
45
40 40
40 35
31 32
25 25 27
22 21
19 17 17
20 14 16 16 16 15
12 12 12 13
10 8 9
7 7 5 7
3 1 1 2 3 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
l S gy
gy
s
y
M ne
r n Inte l S u e
y
ne gy
gy
Pe gy
cs
y
y
ed e
g e ad y
Fa Me y
y
Su n
Ps ery
ry
Su y
er
eu al R tric
er
ar ger
og
g
og
er
og
in
io
at
e h atr i
lo
o
o
lo
lo
lo
lo
ci
ci
ic
as litat
rg
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
t io c h i
co
a
di
go
o
i
io
co
ur
ed
ed
u
i
th
i
di
r
ur
at
si
d
eu
n
i
yn
y
he
ab
a
M
Pa
gn erm
O
en e/P
R
tic
ar
N
N
ca
rth Gy
a
t
ily
di
al
n
es
er
ul
E m tic
nc
ld
ol
D
gi
ae
rn
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
t
os
ci
lo
Pl
O
tio
an
ia
op
d
C
Va
di
G
ro
an
ad
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
t ri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
In
bs
ed
te
O
In
M
al
ic
ys
Ph

Membership in Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Honor Medical Society is an honor reserved for students with high academic
achievement. AOA membership is limited to students in medical schools that sponsor an AOA chapter. Most, but not all,
allopathic schools in the United States participate. An analysis of its relationship with success in the Match is limited by the
relatively small number of applicants who are members, by the fact that some schools do not have AOA chapters, and by the
fact that other schools elect AOA members too late in the academic year for it to be considered in the application process.
Data on AOA membership are self-reported. Overall, 16.7 percent of U.S. seniors included in this report claimed AOA
membership. Among applicants who matched to their preferred specialty, 17.0 percent reported AOA membership,
compared to 6.4 percent of unmatched applicants.
As with several of the other measures, the most competitive specialties are able to attract the greatest proportion of AOA
members. All specialties attract some AOA applicants, but for most specialties AOA members account for fewer than one in
four successful applicants.
Chart Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Graduating from One of the 40
13 U.S. Medical Schools with the Highest NIH Funding*
by Preferred Specialty and Match Status
80
60
50
48
40
44
40
40
39
38
37
35
35
34
34
34
32
31
31
30
30
30
30
29
29
28
28
27
26
26
25
25
25
20
24
24
22
22
20
18
17
16
15
14
11
6
0
gy
y
ne
Pe ine
y
ad s
gy
rth Gyn ogy
Pe gy
ab cs
Ps ery
n
gy
try
og
og
er
ric
er
og
er
og
og
er
io
in
ri
lo
lo
lo
lo
ci
tio chia
ic
at
rg
rg
rg
rg
rg
at
at
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
io
di
di
io
ho
ro
ed
ilit
Su
Su
Su
u
Su
ge adi
ur
nc
at
di
ng
di
ec
es
Fa Me
e
eu
y
M
M
m
Pa
e
O
ry
th
eu a l R
tic
ar
al
c
N
N
ca
er
eh
y
al
ily
di
la
e/
n
es
er
ul
Em tic
nc
as
ld
gi
rn
ae
to
n
m
R
en
sc
n
An
d
hi
os
lo
Pl
O
te
ic
t io
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
G
ro
ed
gn
In
ad
an
er
en
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
In
bs
ed
te
O
In
M
al
ic
ys
Ph
*NIH funding information was obtained from NIH website: http://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm.
Some program directors may give preference to applicants with research experience or who graduated from a
research-intensive medical school. To test that assumption, we obtained data on the amount of NIH grant awards and
identified the 40 schools with the highest NIH funding. This measure, by definition, is limited to students of U.S. medical
schools. Overall, 31.9 percent of matched and 22.5 percent of unmatched U.S. seniors were graduates of one of the 40
medical schools with the highest NIH funding.
Chart 13 shows the percentage of U.S. allopathic seniors who graduated from those schools by specialty and Match
outcome. For example, 31 percent of U.S. seniors who matched in Anesthesiology were graduates of one of the 40 medical
schools with the highest NIH funding, and 26 percent of seniors who did not match in Anesthesiology were graduates of
those schools.
Dermatology had the highest percentage of matched U.S. seniors who were graduates of a medical school with the highest
NIH funding. Neurological Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Radiation Oncology also had higher percentages of matched
applicants from those schools compared to the other specialties. For all specialties except Pathology and Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation, smaller percentages of seniors who did not match to their preferred specialty were graduates of a
medical school with the highest NIH funding compared to seniors who matched.
Chart Percentage of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Have a Graduate Degree
Ph.D.
80
60
40
2325
20 11 14 12 13 21 22
20 64 55 11 12 24 52 30 65 4 10 12 50 30 20 34 54
0 00
0
a b cs
ne
ad s
ne gy
ry ery
Su n
Su y
y
gy
Pe gy
y
gy
ne
ed e
l S gy
eu ry
Su y
Ps ery
ry
er
eu al R tric
g
og
og
og
g
er
io
n
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
o
ci
ci
ci
as litat
rg
rg
rg
rg
ol
ol
ol
tio chi
a
ro
di
co
ro
co
go
i
di
io
ur
ed
di
si
ge ad i
th
at
e
eu
n
i
n
y
he
M
M
gn erm
Pa
O
en e/P
R
c
al
tic
ar
N
rth Gy
ca
st
ily
di
y
al
la
n
er
ul
Em tic
nc
ld
D
e
ae
gi
rn
to
m
R
en
sc
n
d
An
hi
os
lo
Pl
O
e
c
Fa
tio
ia
an
op
d
C
Va
i
t
G
ro
ed
n
ad
an
er
cs
M
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
rn
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Other Graduate Degrees
80
60 50 50
36 36 38
40 27 25 28 27 23 24
20 15 11 1618 17 1718 18 1922 18 2022 1511 20 17 1821 1322 22 1514 1517 1817 1819 1911
0
0
gy
Ps ery
y
gy
Su y
gy
y
Su n
ry
eu r y
e
l S gy
ed e
ne gy
ry ery
ad s
Pe gy
ab cs
Su y
g
er
og
og
eu al R tric
g
er
io
in
in
ge
at
eh atri
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
lo
ci
as litat
ic
rg
rg
rg
rg
l
ol
ol
tio chi
ro
co
io
go
i
io
i
co
ro
a
ur
ed
ed
ed
rn Inte l Su
si
at
th
di
i
ge ad
eu
n
n
y
he
M
M
M
gn erm
Pa
O
R
e n e/P
ar
tic
c
N
rth Gy
ca
ra
st
al
di
y
ily
la
ul
tic
nc
ld
e
D
e
rn
ae
gi
to
n
m
sc
en
d
An
hi
os
Pl
lo
O
ic
tio
Fa
an
ia
op
d
C
Va
G
ro
ed
an
ad
er
cs
M
Em
ia
R
rv
e
O
tri
N
D
in
al
te
te
ic
In
bs
ed
te
M
In
al
ic
ys
Ph
Chart 14 shows by preferred specialty and match status the percentage of U.S. allopathic seniors who have a Ph.D. and/or
other graduate degrees. Pathology, Radiation Oncology, Neurological Surgery, Neurology, and Child Neurology had the
highest percentages of matched U.S. seniors with a Ph.D. degree. For most specialties, the percentage of unmatched U.S.
seniors who have other graduate degrees was higher than that of their matched counterparts.
AN Anesthesiology
AN-1 Anesthesiology
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=1,012) (n=38)
10. Percentage who graduated from one of the 40 U.S. medical 30.6 26.3
schools with the highest NIH funding
Note: Only U.S. allopathic seniors who gave consent to use their information in research are included.
Chart Number of Distinct Specialties Ranked by U.S. Allopathic Seniors
AN-1 Anesthesiology

800
700
Number of Applicants
600
500
400
300
200
131
100 78
19 13 6 13 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More
Distinct Specialties Ranked
Chart Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

AN-2 Anesthesiology
700
600
500 444
400
300
200
100 61 65 66 60 52 68
29 32 44
9 10 10 2 19 7 14 4 20 2 19 2 2 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 2 1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Contiguous Ranks
written permission of the NRMP. U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2018
Graph Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by Number of
AN-1 Contiguous Ranks
Anesthesiology
Probability of Matching
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Number of Contiguous Ranks
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2016-2018 applicants
Anesthesiology
AN-3
Matched Not Matched
280
247
240 214
200 191
160
130
120 100
77
80
40 18 24
7 13 5 8 10
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3
0
<= 180 Between 181 Between 191 Between 201 Between 211 Between 221 Between 231 Between 241 Between 251 >260 Score
and 190 and 200 and 210 and 220 and 230 and 240 and 250 and 260 Unknown
Step 1 Scores

AN-4 Anesthesiology
Matched Not Matched

276
280
240 219
202
200
160
120 111
120
80
49
40 24
11 14 7 5
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 3 2 1
0
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Step 2 CK Scores

Graph Probability of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Matching to Preferred Specialty by USMLE Step 1 Score
AN-2 Anesthesiology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Note: Probabilities calculated based on 2016-2018 applicants.
Chart Number of Research Projects of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
AN-5 Anesthesiology
Matched Not Matched

450
400
350
300
227 240
250
197
200
142 147
150
100 59
50 11
7 2 9 3 6
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 or More
Research Projects
Chart Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

AN-6 Anesthesiology
450 Matched Not Matched 423

400
350
300
250
200
143 132
150 122
108
100 84
50 15
9 6 4 2 2
0
Publications
Chart Number of Work Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors
AN-7 Anesthesiology
Matched Not Matched
320 309
280
240
200
200
165
160 142
127
120
80 69
40 13
6 3 7 5 4
0
Work Experiences
Chart Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

AN-8 Anesthesiology
Matched Not Matched

320
282
280
240
200
160
122 114 113
120 105
84
80 57 64
39
40 24
8 7 14
2 0 2 1 4 3 3 2 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Volunteer Experiences
Chart Other Characteristics of U.S. Seniors
AN-9 Anesthesiology
Matched Not Matched
AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical

Schools with the Highest NIH Funding
1,000
1,000
855
800
800
702
600
600
400 400
310
200 200
106
32 28
1 10
0 0
Yes No Yes No
Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree

1,000 988 1,000
867
800 800
600 600
400 400
200 200 145
24 38 29
0 9
0 0
Yes No Yes No
Source: NRMP Data Warehouse. Top 40 U.S. medical schools with the highest NIH funding from NIH: http://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm
CN Child Neurology
CN-1 Child Neurology
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=97) (n=1)

80
70
60
50
40
30
18
20
10
1 0 1 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched
80
70
60
50
40
30
20 14 16 16
9 10
10 4 4 6 5 5
2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
CN-1 Contiguous Ranks
Child Neurology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Child Neurology
CN-3
Matched Not Matched
35
30
25
25
20
20 17
15 13
11
10
6
5 3 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched

34
35
30
25
20
20
15
15 12
10 7
6
5 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

45
40
35
30
24 24
25 21
20 16
15
9
10
5 3
0 0 0 1 0 0
0
Research Projects

Matched Not Matched 44
45
40
35
30
25
20
16
15
10 11
9
10 7
5
1 0 0 0 0 0
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
28 26
24
21
20
16 15 15
13
12
8 7
4
1
0 0 0 0 0
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

28 27
24
20
16
13
12
12 10 10
9 9
8
4
4
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

100
100
80 77
80
60 60
60
40 40 37
20 14 20
0 1 0 1
0 0
Yes No Yes No

100 100
87 87
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
10 10
0 1 0 1
0 0
Yes No Yes No
DM Dermatology
DM-1 Dermatology
Matched Unmatched
DM-1 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched

140 129 131
120
100
80
60
60
40 32
28
18
20 9
2
0
1 2 3 4 or More

DM-2 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched

140
120
100
80
60
40 31 30 34 31 30
24 26 28
21 21
13 13 14 14 10 16
20 7 8 8 7
6 4 5 4 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
DM-1 Contiguous Ranks
Dermatology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Dermatology
DM-3
Matched Not Matched
140
120 114
98
100
80
58
60
42
40
19 18 22
20 13
2 6 5 6 6 2
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

DM-4 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched
140 131
120
102
100
80
60 55
40 30
16 15 18 15
20 13
4 2 5 3 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

DM-2 Dermatology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
DM-5 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched

350
300
250
191
200
150
100
57 53
40
50 25
13 9 9 13
1 1 0
0
Research Projects

DM-6 Dermatology

311
300
250
200
150
100
57
50
3 3 2 1 5 2 8 1 11 8
0
Publications
DM-7 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched
180
160
140
120 107
100
80 68
61
60 48
42
40 27
14 15 11
20 5 5 9
0
Work Experiences

DM-8 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched

180 169
160
140
120
100
80
60
40 27 31 30 30
21 17 21
20 14
3 8 8 3 4 7 6 7 3
0 0 2 1
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
DM-9 Dermatology
Matched Not Matched

350
350
300
300
250
250
200
167 200 178
147 162
150 150
100 100
53 54
50 50
16 18
0 0
Yes No Yes No

350 350
320
300 300 288
250 250
200 200
150 150
100 100
69
52 59
50 50
20 13
3
0 0
Yes No Yes No
DR Diagnostic Radiology
DR-1 Diagnostic Radiology
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

400 376
350
300
250
200
150 125
101
100
50 30 26
9 17
5
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

400
350
300
250
200 170
150
100
54 51 52 62 50
28 39
50 15 14 6 14 3 19 22 18
11 4 7 6 10 4 6 4 1 5 2 2 3 4 3 3
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
DR-1 Contiguous Ranks
Diagnostic Radiology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Diagnostic Radiology
DR-3
Matched Not Matched
180
160 152
140 129 134
120
100 94
80
60 46 41
40
17 12 13 12 13
20 7 8 5 6
0 0 0 0 2 1 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched

176
180
160 147
140
118
120
97
100
80
60
41
40
18 15 16 21
20 11 14 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 3
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

350
300
250 221
200
150 133
107
100 89
59
50 25
12 10 17 10 7
2
0
Research Projects

300
250
200
150
100
70 60
54 59
46
50 27
7 10 10 13 4
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
180 171
160
140
117
120 111
100 90
78
80
60 54
40 25
20 11 11 13
4 7
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

180
164
160
140
120
100
81 76
80
51 56 51 51
60 47
40 26
11 12 16
20 7 6 6 10 5 6
2 4 2 2
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

600
600
500 484
500
435
400
400
300
300
200 200 186
98
100 60 100 61
5 10
0 0
Yes No Yes No

594
600 600
522
500 500
400 400
300 300
200 200
99
100 68 100
55
27 16
3
0 0
Yes No Yes No
EM Emergency Medicine
EM-1 Emergency Medicine
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=1,538) (n=141)
Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,433
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200 69 94 58 11
8 2 3
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400 349
141 183 165 172

200 76 109 128
29 24 31 9 39 9 71
5 14 12 24 15 22 13 12 6 8 3 1 1 4 0 1 3
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
EM-1 Contiguous Ranks
Emergency Medicine
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Emergency Medicine
EM-3
Matched Not Matched
450
400 362
350 321
288
300
250
203
200 177
150 111
100
50 24 35 26 25 25 34
14 14 18
0 0 0 0 2 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
450
405
400 368
350
300 284
251
250
200
144
150
100
53
32 37 27 22 29
50 17
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 1
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

600
500
400 367
294 303 288
300
200 173
113
100
39 29 27 23
9 14
0
Research Projects


545
500
400
300 283
217
199
200 158
136
100
27 25 29 37
15 8
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
600
519
500
400
300 274 269

216
191
200
100 69
47
21 20 19 27
7
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

600
499
500
400
300
200 177 162

141 144
118 117
100 78 80
39
5 17 8 11 20 12 18 11 9 10
1 2
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,600
1,400
1,276 1,400
1,200
1,200 1,114
1,000
1,000
800
800
600 600
424
400 400
190
200 137 200 113
1 28
0 0
Yes No Yes No

1,600 1,521 1,600
1,400 1,400
1,291
1,200 1,200
1,000 1,000
800 800
600 600
400 400
247
200 140 200 117
17 1 24
0 0
Yes No Yes No
FM Family Medicine
FM-1 Family Medicine
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=1,438) (n=55)
1,354 Matched Not Matched

1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
36 77
18 7 1 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400 287
200 101 87 125 122 128 106 98 95
45 21 24 4 25 8 34 6 33 3 62 66
1 5 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
FM-1 Contiguous Ranks
Family Medicine
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Family Medicine
FM-3
Matched Not Matched
350 316
300
265
261
250 223
200 174
150 126
100
48
50 19 18 10 3 11 14
0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
350 321
297 303
300
250
200
200 172
150
100 87
50 27 20 31
17 8 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

450
400
350 326 327

300
257
250 227
198
200
150
103
100
50 11 21
6 6 5 6
0
Research Projects


400
341
350
300
250 238
200 185
166
150
89
100
50 13 17
12 9 3 1
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
600
498
500
400
300 282
215
193
200 157
93
100
29
1 5 5 9 6
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

600
531
500
400
300
200 167
121 131 114
106 107
100 84
44
12 21 5 6 6 5 4 20
0 2 3 2 2
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,600
1,400
1,267 1,400
1,200
1,200
1,039
1,000
1,000
800
800
600 600
400 399
400
200 107 200
47 43
0 12
0 0
Yes No Yes No

1,600 1,600
1,424
1,400 1,400
1,195
1,200 1,200
1,000 1,000
800 800
600 600
400 400
243
200 200
14 54 18 37
1
0 0
Yes No Yes No
GS General Surgery
GS-1 General Surgery
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=919) (n=161)
Matched Not Matched

1,000
889
800
600
400
200 127
27 33
1 1 1 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

1,000
800
600
400
269
200
72 82 91 91 79
43 32 5 44 45
11 28 9 23 7 18 11 12 16 19 17 13 10 6 7 8 4 3 0 1 4
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
GS-1 Contiguous Ranks
General Surgery
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
General Surgery
GS-3
Matched Not Matched
280
239
240
200 176 179

160
132
112
120
80
35 44 44
31 34
40 13 16
0 0 0 0 7 8 1 2 5 2
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched

276
280
240 219
200
171
155
160
120
80 65
40 46
40 26 22 17
15 8 8 9
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

500
450
400
350
295
300
250 223
200 163
141
150
100 74
36 50
50 23 25 24 19
7
0
Research Projects


465
450
400
350
300
250
200
150 109 110
93 81
100 61 74
50 20 16 22 20 9
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
320
286
280
240
200 177
157
160
125
113
120
80 61 63
22 31
40 18 18
9
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

320
281
280
240
200
160
120 111 102 100

80 74
80 67
44 48
35
40 23 19 21 16
9 12 13 10 8
2 2 3
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

1,000
1,000
800
800
701
653
600
600
400 400
266
200 172 154 200
123
2 38
0 0
Yes No Yes No

1,000 1,000
901
800 800 754

600 600
400 400
200 155 200 165

126
18 35
6
0 0
Yes No Yes No
IM Internal Medicine
IM-1 Internal Medicine
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=3,070) (n=59)
Matched Not Matched

3,200 2,954
2,800
2,400
2,000
1,600
1,200
800
400
43 101 14 14 2 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

3,200
2,800
2,400
2,000
1,600
1,200
818
800
400 205 265 250 299 241 222 215

50 19 35 4 52 4 70 2 80 2 113 128
27 18 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
IM-1 Contiguous Ranks
Internal Medicine
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Internal Medicine
IM-3
Matched Not Matched
800
700 648
602
600
509
500
390 412
400
300 231
200 128
109
100 25 39
0 0 2 0 16 7 5 3 1 1 0 1
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
800 724
684
700
585
600
484
500
400
307
300
200 175
91
100
0 0 0 0 1 2 19 6 17 18 6 3 0 1 6
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
848
800
650
589
600
397 440
400
200 146
9 9 16 6 6 13
0
Research Projects


1,407
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
365 332 342 322
400 302
200
11 16 7 3 1 21
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
1,000 932
800
600 551 528

469
400 313
277
200
5 5 13 3 7 26
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

1,000 923
800
600
400 355
311 309
258 257
221
200 168 172
78
18 1 5 3 5 6 10 4 5 5 0 15
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

3,200
3,200
2,800
2,800
2,352
2,400
2,400
2,000 2,040
2,000
1,600
1,600
1,200 1,200 1,030
800 800
513
400 400
1 54 9 50
0 0
Yes No Yes No

3,200 3,200
2,929
2,800 2,800
2,561
2,400 2,400
2,000 2,000
1,600 1,600
1,200 1,200
800 800
509
400 400
141 58
1 20 39
0 0
Yes No Yes No
IP Internal Medicine/Pediatrics
IP-1 Internal Medicine/Pediatrics
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

240
212
200
160
120
80 68
40
7 10 5 2 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

200
160
120
80
32 29 36
40 28 25 25
15 19 21
7 7 10 3 6 9 9 6 8
1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
IP-1 Contiguous Ranks
Internal Medicine/Pediatrics
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Internal Medicine/Pediatrics
IP-3
Matched Not Matched
80 74
70
60 54
51
50
40 36
33
30
20 17
13
10 5 4 6 5 3 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
80 75
70
70 64
60
50
42
40
30
20
20
6 8
10 4 5 4 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

120
100
80
64
58 59
60
49
39
40
20 16
4 3 4 6
1 1
0
Research Projects

100
80
60
38 41
40 33 35
23
20
5 8
1 2 2 1
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
140
120
100 91
80
56
60
44 44
40 28
22
20
3 3 3 3 6
1
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

140
122
120
100
80
60
40 29
25 24 26 22 22
20 10
4 2 2 3 2 2 6
0 0 1 1 0 0 1
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

280
280
240
240
202
200
200 186
160
160
120 120
99
80 71 80
40 40
18 16
0 3
0 0
Yes No Yes No

277
280 280
240 240 229

200 200
160 160
120 120
80 80
56
40 40
19 15
8 4
0
0 0
Yes No Yes No
IR Interventional Radiology
IR-1 Interventional Radiology
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

100 96
80
61
60
40
20 12
11
8
5
2 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

100
88
80
60
60
40
28
24 24
20 18 18
20 14 16
10 10 12 10
8 6 8 8
4 4 2 4 4 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
IR-1 Contiguous Ranks
Interventional Radiology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Interventional Radiology
IR-3
Matched Not Matched
80
70
60
50
40 37 37
30 23 25
20
20
11 12 11 11
8
10 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
80 76 76
70
60
48 50
50 44
40 34
30 26
20 16
10 12
10 6
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

120
104
100
80
60
60 56
40 36 34 34
30
22
18
20
4 2 2
0
Research Projects

100
77
80
60
47
40
20 16
10 12 11
5 7 8
2 4 2
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
60
50
40 35
30
24 24
22
20 18 17
14 14
12
10 7 8
6
0
Work Experiences


60
50 46
40
32
30 28 28
24 24
20 20 20
20 18
16
14
10
10 8 8
6 6 6
4
2 2
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

120
120
100
100
80 76
69 82
80
60
60 58
40 36
20 40 36
10
25
0 20
Yes No Yes No

120 120
111
101
100 100
79
80 80 74
60 60
40 40
20 20 17
7 9
4
0 0
Yes No Yes No
NS Neurological Surgery
NS-1 Neurological Surgery
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

200
182
160
120
80
40
20
5 7
1 1 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

200
160
118
120
80
40
9 9 9 14
1 2 2 3 1 1 0 2 0 0 3 3 6 2 3 3 5 3 3 3 0 5 1 0 0 0 5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
NS-1 Contiguous Ranks
Neurological Surgery
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Neurological Surgery
NS-3
Matched Not Matched
70 67
60
50 47
40
31
30
18
20 15
10
10 6 7 5
2 4 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
70
60
50 47 45
39
40
30 25
20 15
10 10
10 7
4 2 4 4 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

180
160
140
120
103
100
80
60
37
40 30
20 14 14
4 1 4 3 6
0 0
0
Research Projects


160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
20 7 8
1 1 0 2 2 2 0 3
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
70
58
60
50 46
40
30 25 24
20
20 15
9
10 5 4 5
2 3
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

70 66
60
50
40
30
22 20
20 15
11 11 12 13 13
10
10 6 6
2 2 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

180
180
160
160
140
140
120 111 120
106
100
100
80 82
80
60
60 60
40 40
20 25
20 20
6 3
0 0
Yes No Yes No

180 180
164
160 160 153
140 140
120 120
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40 35
24 27
21
20 20
7
1
0 0
Yes No Yes No
N Neurology
N-1 Neurology
Matched Unmatched
N-1 Neurology

350
300
250
200
150
100 79
50
6 9 12
1 1 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

N-2 Neurology
Matched Not Matched

350
300
250
200
150
100 70
34 39 37 45 45 43 40
50 27
9 6 8 13 6 16
2 3 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
N-1 Contiguous Ranks
Neurology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Neurology
N-3
Matched Not Matched
100
78 81
75
80
70
60 51
48
40
16 17
20
6 3 3
0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0
0
Step 1 Scores

N-4 Neurology
Matched Not Matched
100 91 94
90
80
57
60 52
40 36
20 12
5 6 5 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
0

N-2 Neurology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
N-5 Neurology
Matched Not Matched

240
200
160 146
120
80 81 74
80
47
40
9 2 3 5 5
1 0
0
Research Projects

N-6 Neurology
200
160
120
80
46 44 42 42
37
40
1 3 2 3 7
0
0
Publications
N-7 Neurology
Matched Not Matched
140 134
120
97
100
80
64
58
60
41 43
40
20
2 4 2 6
1 1
0
Work Experiences

N-8 Neurology
Matched Not Matched

140
121
120
100
80
60 51 50
43 46
40 31 30 31
21
20 9
4 0 1 2 0 4 2 0 1 0 2 4
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
N-9 Neurology
Matched Not Matched

400
364 400
350
350
300
300 289
250
250
200
200
150 148
150
100 100
52
50 50
15 12
0 4
0 0
Yes No Yes No

400 386 400
367
350 350
300 300
250 250
200 200
150 150
100 100
70
51
50 50
14 6 10
2
0 0
Yes No Yes No
OB Obstetrics and Gynecology
OB-1 Obstetrics and Gynecology
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=1,005) (n=132)
Matched Not Matched

1,000 952
800
600
400
200
104
52 23 1 5 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

1,000
800
600
400
214
200 108
93 96 96 94 78
48 63
5 10 9 13 9 6 12 16 20 10 30 12 30 9 3 10 6 9 8 4 6 2 8
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
OB-1 Contiguous Ranks
Obstetrics and Gynecology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Obstetrics and Gynecology
OB-3
Matched Not Matched
280
240 230
220
200 176
166
160
120
92
80 67
40 24 24 31 23 23
18 20
10 4 1 7 1
0 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched

276
280
241
240
200 177
158
160
120 97
80
33 32 30
40 23 22 21
12 8 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

450
400
350
300 283
238
250
197
200
157
150
106
100
50 24 36 35
21 19 17
4
0
Research Projects

448
400
350
300
250
200
150 130
116 113 115
100 83
48
50 16 23 15 18 12
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
450
400
344
350
300
250
200 172 181
149
150 112
100
47 50
50 11 22 18 23
8
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

450 414
400
350
300
250
200
150
105 100 109
100 86
60 67 54
50 38
19 6 14 11 12 11 10 6
2 1 5 2 5
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

1,000
1,000
800
800
800
665
600
600
400 400 340
200 163 200

120 109
4 23
0 0
Yes No Yes No

992
1,000 1,000
827
800 800
600 600
400 400
200 200 178

132 106
13 0 26
0 0
Yes No Yes No
ORS Orthopaedic Surgery
ORS-1 Orthopaedic Surgery
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=678) (n=132)
Matched Not Matched

700
640
600
500
400
300
200
96
100
34 31
3 3 1 2
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

700
600
500
400
300
184
200
100 64 52 55 52 45
16 15 26 15 21 13 35 38 34 12 34
4 11 5 12 13 11 7 7 7 3 3 2 7 2 5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
ORS-1 Contiguous Ranks
Orthopaedic Surgery
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Matched Not Matched
280
240 220
205
200
160
120 108
85
80
39 36
40 23 29 25
13 5 9 4
0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 1
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
280
241
240
206
200
160 138
120
80
52
39 34
40 17 19 26
8 15
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 5 3
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

500
400
321
300
200
123 121
100 81 66
31 22 22 18
1 1 3
0
Research Projects

400
300
200
100 82
48 49 50
23 34
9 9 15 8 9
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
240
202
200
160 139
130
120
92
75
80
40 47
40 24 25
15 16
5
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

240
208
200
160
120
75 73
80 66 63
50 55 53
37
40 24
15 13 18 11
3 8 9 9 8 10
1 1
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

700
700
600
600
500
500 462
400 366 400
300 274 300
216
200 200
101 97
100 100
21 35
0 0
Yes No Yes No

700 669 700
593
600 600
500 500
400 400
300 300
200 200
129
105
100 100 85
9 27
3
0 0
Yes No Yes No
OTO Otolaryngology
OTO-1 Otolaryngology
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

280 264
240
200
160
120
80
40
8 12 4 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

240
200
160
120 101
80
27 35 32
40 22
6 7 13 6 12
4 3 1 0 2 3 3 0 1 1 4 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
OTO-1 Contiguous Ranks
Otolaryngology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Matched Not Matched

97
100
87
80
60
40 33
30
20
20
6 3 5
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
100
87 86
80
60
47
40
26
20 15
11
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 3 2 1 2 1
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

240
200
173
160
120
80
42
40 32
21
8 1 5 3 3
0 0 0
0
Research Projects


221
200
160
120
80
40
13 15 15
4 8 3 2 5
0 1 1
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
100 95
80
60
43 41
39 38
40
20
20
3 2 5
1 1 0
0
Work Experiences


100
80
60
40
30
27 27
23 22
16 18
20 12
2 2 2 2 4
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

280
280
240
240
200 193
200
160 152
160
120 111
120
83
80 80
40 40
10 11
1 1
0 0
Yes No Yes No

280 264 280
240 240
219
200 200
160 160
120 120
80 80
57
40 40
12 12 9
0 3
0 0
Yes No Yes No
PTH Pathology
PTH-1 Pathology
Matched Unmatched
PTH-1 Pathology
Matched Not Matched

200 190
160
120
80
40
3 4 1 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

PTH-2 Pathology
Matched Not Matched

200
160
120
80
40 29
19 22 20 17
8 8 7 9 12 13 10 10
0 0 0 5 0 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
PTH-1 Contiguous Ranks
Pathology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Pathology
PTH-3
Matched Not Matched
50
39 40
38
40
30
21
20 17
14 13
9
10
3
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

PTH-4 Pathology
Matched Not Matched
50 46
40
40
35
30
24
19 18
20
10 6 6
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0
0

PTH-2 Pathology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
PTH-5 Pathology
Matched Not Matched

120
100
80
60
46
40
40 34 33
29
20 12
0 1 1 1 0 1
0
Research Projects

PTH-6 Pathology

106
100
80
60
40
22 21
16 18
20 11
2 0 1 0 0 1
0
Publications
PTH-7 Pathology
Matched Not Matched
60 56
50
40
33
31 31
30 26
20 17
10
3
1 0 0 0 0
0
Work Experiences

PTH-8 Pathology
Matched Not Matched

60
50
41
40
30
30
22
19 19 19
20
13 14
10 6 7
4
2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
PTH-9 Pathology
Matched Not Matched

180
162 180
160
160
140
140
120 119
120
100
100
80 80 75
60 60
40 40
20 17
20
1 3 2 2
0 0
Yes No Yes No

180 180
160 152 160 152
140 140
120 120
100 100
80 80
60 60
42 42
40 40
20 20
1 3 2 2
0 0
Yes No Yes No
PD Pediatrics
PD-1 Pediatrics
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=1,640) (n=18)
PD-1 Pediatrics

1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
14 60
4 2 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

PD-2 Pediatrics
Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
365
400
134 153 169 167 162 131
200 74 102
31 4 20 4 14 2 20 1 24 1 23 1 51 2
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
PD-1 Contiguous Ranks
Pediatrics
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Pediatrics
PD-3
Matched Not Matched
450
400
341
350
302
300 278
236
250
188
200
150 135
114
100
50 28 18
0 0 0 0 2 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 3
0
Step 1 Scores

PD-4 Pediatrics
Matched Not Matched
450 419
400
350 319 324

300
250 216 204
200
150 109
100
50 33
16 2 4 3 2 1 6
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

PD-2 Pediatrics
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
PD-5 Pediatrics
Matched Not Matched

700
600
500
383
400
331 324
300 275
217
200
110
100
0 2 6 0 2 8
0
Research Projects

PD-6 Pediatrics

614
600
500
400
300 256
226 206
200 178 160
100
2 1 2 3 0 10
0
Publications
PD-7 Pediatrics
Matched Not Matched
700
600
486
500
400
331
285
300 237
204
200
97
100
1 2 2 2 3 8
0
Work Experiences

PD-8 Pediatrics

700
600
500
400
300
200 165 170

129 146
121
81 84
100 46
0 0 12 0 0 2 2 2 1 0 3 1 7
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
PD-9 Pediatrics
Matched Not Matched

1,600
1,600
1,400 1,320
1,400
1,200
1,200 1,152
1,000
1,000
800
800
600 600 488
400 400
239
200 200
0 13 1 17
0 0
Yes No Yes No

1,592
1,600 1,600
1,409
1,400 1,400
1,200 1,200
1,000 1,000
800 800
600 600
400 400
231
200 200
48 18 16
0 2
0 0
Yes No Yes No
PM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
PM-1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

140 133
120
100
80
58
60
40 32
20 12 11
5 5 2
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

140
120
100
81
80
60
40
22 18
14 16
20 8 7 8 7 8 11 9 10
5 3 3 5 2 4 1 1 4 2 1 3 1 1 1 3
0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
PM-1 Contiguous Ranks
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
PM-3
Matched Not Matched
70
62
60
52
50
40 36
30 27
24
20
9 11 10
10 7 5 7
4 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
70
59
60 54
50 43
38
40
30
20 14
11 9
7 6 8
10 4
3 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

100
80
63
60 51 50
40
27 24
20 13
4 7 7 5 7
1
0
Research Projects

80
60
40 35
29 30
19 19
20
7 9
5 6 4
0
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
100
81
80
60
40
40 34 31
23
19
20
6 7 4 4 7
3
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

100
90
80
60
40
24
19 21 21
20 17
13 12
8 9
4 6 4
3 1 2 2 3
0 0 0 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

240
240
198
200
200
173
160
160
120
120
80 80
55
40 29 40 23
12 8
0
0 0
Yes No Yes No

240 240
223
200 200 197

160 160
120 120
80 80
40 31 40 31 26
5 0 5
0 0
Yes No Yes No
PS Plastic Surgery
PS-1 Plastic Surgery
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

120
105
100
80
60
40
40
20 12 12
1 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

120
100
80
61
60
40
20 12 9 9 10 10 11
2 2 2 2 2 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 5
1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
PS-1 Contiguous Ranks
Plastic Surgery
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Plastic Surgery
PS-3
Matched Not Matched

50
50
44
40
30
23
21
20
10 7 7
5 5
1 1 2 1 2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
50 47
44
40
32
30
20
11
10 8 7
4 5 4 4
1 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

140
120
100 90
80
60
40
24 23
20 13
3 6 2 4 4
0 0 1
0
Research Projects


128
120
100
80
60
40
21
20
2 2 4 6 5
1 1 0 0 0
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
60
53
50
40
30 28
23
19
20 17
10 8
6 5 5
2 2 2
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

60
49
50
40
30
20 16
14 14 13 14
11
10 8
5 6
3 2 2 2 3 3 2
1 0 1 0 1
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
87
80
65 69 80
60 59
60
40 40
19 17
20 20
3 7
0 0
Yes No Yes No

160 160
142
140 140
121
120 120
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
23 25
20
20 20
4 1 4
0 0
Yes No Yes No
P Psychiatry
P-1 Psychiatry
Matched Unmatched
Measure (n=869) (n=154)
P-1 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched

1,000
824
800
600
400
200 122
37 24 8 6 0 2
0
1 2 3 4 or More

P-2 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched

1,000
800
600
400
200
65 83 75 83 71 74 92
27 19 39 10 46 17 48 53 49 34 3
14 22 16 13 11 15 14 12 6 3 4 1 1 3
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
P-1 Contiguous Ranks
Psychiatry
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Psychiatry
P-3
Matched Not Matched
200
180
162
150
160
128
120
94
80 68
59
31 33 34
40 24
15 20
8 4 7 5
0 0 1 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

P-4 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched
200 189 191

167
160
124
120
85
75
80
43
40 32 29
19 23
15 9 13
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4
0

P-2 Psychiatry
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
180 200 220 240 260 280
Step 1 Score
P-5 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched

400
350
300
250 232
190
200
150 131 136

114
100 66
44
50 17 26 24 28
15
0
Research Projects

P-6 Psychiatry

362
350
300
250
200
150 119
102 103 108
100 75
58
50 26 27 17
16 10
0
Publications
P-7 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched
320
276
280
240
200 181
166
160
118
120
77
80 51 53
40 20 30 25
10 16
0
Work Experiences

P-8 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched

320 300
280
240
200
160
120 94 87
72 68 67 67
80
49 52
25 34
40 17 20 14 15
6 2 4 8 11 8 3
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
P-9 Psychiatry
Matched Not Matched

1,000
1,000
800 752
800
600 567
600
400 400
302
200 137 200

120
59
1 34
0 0
Yes No Yes No

1,000 1,000
825
800 800
722
600 600
400 400
200 148 200 147 128

44 26
6
0 0
Yes No Yes No
RO Radiation Oncology
RO-1 Radiation Oncology
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

100
91
80
60
41
40
30
20
3 5
2 2 1
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched
100
80
60
38
40
17 15 18 17
20 14
6 7 7 9 7
1 3 1 2 3 2 4 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
RO-1 Contiguous Ranks
Radiation Oncology
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Radiation Oncology
RO-3
Matched Not Matched
50
42 43
40
32
30 27
20
13
10
4 3 3
1 1 2 1 2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
50 47
45
38
40
30
20
13 13
10 8
3 4
1 1 2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

160
140
120 111
100
80
60
40 31
20 9 14
3 2 1 5
0 0 0 0
0
Research Projects

140
120
100
80
60
40
20 9
1 5 4 4 2
0 0 0 0 0
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
50 46
40 38
30 26 27
20 18
10
10
5
3
0 1 1 1
0
Work Experiences

Matched Not Matched

50
45
40
30
21 20
19
20
13 13
11
9
10 7 6
4
1 1 1 1 1 1 2
0 0 0 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

140
140
120
120
100 93 99
100
80
80
66
60 58
60
40 40
20 20
6 9
3 2
0 0
Yes No Yes No

140 132 140 135
120 120
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 33 40
30
20 20
9 10
2 1
0 0
Yes No Yes No
VS Vascular Surgery
VS-1 Vascular Surgery
Matched Unmatched
Matched Not Matched

32
28
23
24
20 19
16
12
8
4
4 3
1
0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 or More

Matched Not Matched

32 30
28
24
20
16
12
8
3
4
1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 or
More
VS-1 Contiguous Ranks
Vascular Surgery
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Vascular Surgery
VS-3
Matched Not Matched

16
16
14
12
10 9
8
8
6
4 3 3
2 2 2
2 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Step 1 Scores

Matched Not Matched
16
14
12 11 11
10 9
8 7
6 5
4 3
2
2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270
Step 1 Score
Matched Not Matched

35
30
25
25
20
15
10
10
5 5
5 2
0 0 1 1 0 0 1
0
Research Projects

30
25
20
15
10
4 5
5
1 1 1 2 1 1
0 0 0
0
Publications
Matched Not Matched
24
20
16 15
12 11
9
8
5
4 3 3
2
1 1
0 0 0
0
Work Experiences


24
20 18
16
12 10
8 8 8
8 6
4 4 4
4 2 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 or More
Matched Not Matched

50
50
40
40
33
30 29
30
20 20 17
10 8 10
4
3
0 1
0 0
Yes No Yes No

50 50
46
40 40
36
30 30
20 20
10
10 10
4
2 2
0 0
0 0
Yes No Yes No

Charting Outcomes in The Match 2018 Seniors PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Charting Outcomes in The Match 2018 Seniors PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Charting Outcomes in the Match:

U.S. Allopathic Seniors

Tables and Charts for Individual Specialties

This report examines the characteristics of U.S. allopathic seniors.

For questions, comments or more information, please contact:

Students/Graduates of U.S. Citizen

Anesthesiology 1,840 2,004 1.09 1,084 45 1,129 0.61

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 12.3 5.3

20 Matched Not Matched

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

3.0 Matched Not Matched

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

7.0 Matched Not Matched

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

7.0 Matched Not Matched

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

10.0 Matched Not Matched

Matched Not Matched

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

100 Matched Not Matched

rth Gyn ogy

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

*NIH funding information was obtained from NIH website: http://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm.

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse

1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 14.6 5.3

2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.3 1.7

3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 232 212

4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 244 226

5. Mean number of research experiences 2.9 2.4

6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 4.5 2.6

7. Mean number of work experiences 3.1 3.1

8. Mean number of volunteer experiences 6.4 6.9

9. Percentage who are AOA members 10.5 2.6

12. Percentage who have another graduate degree 15.0 27.3

790 Matched Not Matched

Distinct Specialties Ranked

Chart Number of Contiguous Ranks of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

Number of Contiguous Ranks

Matched Not Matched

Chart USMLE Step 2 CK Scores of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

Matched Not Matched

Source: NRMP Data Warehouse Step 2 CK Scores

Matched Not Matched

Chart Number of Abstracts, Presentations, and Publications of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

450 Matched Not Matched 423

Matched Not Matched

Chart Number of Volunteer Experiences of U.S. Allopathic Seniors

Matched Not Matched

Matched Not Matched

AOA Membership Graduate of One of the 40 U.S. Medical

Ph.D. Degree Other Graduate Degree

200 200 145

1. Mean number of contiguous ranks 11.8 8.0

2. Mean number of distinct specialties ranked 1.2 1.0

3. Mean USMLE Step 1 score 233 211

4. Mean USMLE Step 2 score 246 234

5. Mean number of research experiences 3.3 3.0

6. Mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications 6.3 0.0

7. Mean number of work experiences 3.0 2.0