Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
(1) General
(2) Decision-making of ÖBB
(1) Construction Design
(2) Methodology
(3) Quality
(4) Cost-Effectiveness
Ballasted Track
Ballast substructure
40%
Rail fastening
Rail pads
60%
• Compact Systems
(Monolithic systems e.g. System Rheda,
System Rheda 2000)
• Baseplate Systems
(e.g. Vossloh, DFF21, Pandrol VIPA)
• Block Systems
(Booted sleeper systems e.g. System Stedef, System LVT)
Construction Design
Elastically Supported Slab
coating
10%
rail fastening
rail pads
90%
Construction Design
System ÖBB-PORR
1 Holes for spindles
2 ÖBB-PORR slab
3 Elastomeric layer
4 Self-compacting concrete (SCC)
5 Rail support point
6 Long rail
7 Concrete base
1
5
4 6
2
3 1
4
7
Construction Design
System ÖBB-PORR
Tunnelachse
High degree of prefabrication
Gleisachse
Ballast backfill
Slab
-0.60
grouting aperture
Vergussbeton Vergussbeton
>43
40
40
Methodology
Structural Implementation
Quality
Results of the Track Recording Vehicle
Ballastless track
Quality
System Comparison
3
Comparison of vibration emission
in KB between the ballasted track KB
A
and different slab track systems in
ÖBB. B
Ballastless track
2
C
D
ÖBB-PORR
0
0 1 2 KB
Ballasted track
Quality
System Comparison
Comparison of structural-borne noise – Slab Track vs. Ballasted Track
10 10
5 5
0
Level 0
Ballast
-5 -5
-10 -10
-15 -15
10
12,5
16
20
100
125
160
80
25
31,5
40
50
63
160
200
250
400
315
40
50
63
80
100
25
31,5
125
Quality
Acceptance Certificate
• Distribution of deviations
Example 638 measurement points, specifications in %
Deviation Position Height Cant Gauge Moving chord position Moving chord height
-4 0.2
-3.5 0.6 [%]
95 %
-3 1.3
32,9
-2.5 4.4
-2 0.2 10.5 29,3 0,1
26,3
-1.5 0.2 18.5 1.1 3,0
21,8
-1 9.1 21.9 5.8 45,1 1,1 10,3
-0.5 46.4 19.9 21.8 19,0 23,3
0 37.5 14.3 32.9 22,7 60,9 30,0
0.5 6.6 5.6 26.3 18,1 8,6 19,3
5,8
1 0.2 2.5 8.6 2,8 0,2 7
1.5 0.2 3.4 7
2 -1,0 -0,5 0 +0,5 +1,0 6
2.5 0.2
Quality
Precision of Track Base Plate
Cost Effectiveness
Life-Cycle Costs (LCC)
Decision-making of ÖBB
Decision-making of ÖBB
• Low maintenance
• Structural-borne noise and vibration control
• High track precision
• Settlement adjustments possible
• Small construction width and height
• Fast installation
• High degree of prefabrication
• High early strength of SCC
• Great driving comfort
• Repair plan
• Large openings possible
• Even surfaced concrete quality
• Little reworking
• High added value
Development in Austria
Großer
1982 Rheda Tunnel rehabilitation 480 m
Türkenschanzparktunnel
Langenlebarn
First Installation in 1989
Development in Austria
1996 – CURRENT: PERIOD OF SLAB TRACK ÖBB-PORR (EXTRACT)
Project Year System Feature Length
New tunnel, light MSS, embankment,
Galgenbergtunnel 1996/1997 Slab track ÖBB-PORR 11 040 m
bridge, 4 turnouts
New tunnel,
Römerbergtunnel 1997 Slab track ÖBB-PORR 638 m
Light and heavy MSS
New tunnel,
Zammertunnel 1998/1999 Slab track ÖBB-PORR 4 477 m
Light and heavy MSS
Wolfsgrubentunnel/ Slab track ÖBB-PORR, New tunnel, medium-weight MSS,
1999/2000 3 730 m
Arlbergtunnel passable with cars 6 turnouts
Siebergtunnel 2000/2001 Slab track ÖBB-PORR New tunnel 12 902 m
Slab track ÖBB-PORR,
Birgltunnel 2004 New tunnel, 6 turnouts 2 650 m
passable with cars
Slab track ÖBB-PORR,
Arlbergtunnel 2005/2007 Tunnel rehabilitation, 8 turnouts 20 812 m
passable with cars
New tunnel, light, medium-weight
Lainzer Tunnel 2010 Slab track ÖBB-PORR 18 075 m
and heavy MSS
High-speed line, new tunnel, light,
Kundl/Radfeld – Baumkirchen 2010 Slab track ÖBB-PORR 69 879 m
medium-weight and heavy MSS
High-speed line, new tunnel,
Wienerwaldtunnel 2010/2011 Slab track ÖBB-PORR bridge and embankment, light, 26 406 m
medium-weight and heavy MSS
Wienerwaldtunnel
Ballastless Track on Floating Track Slab
Wienerwaldtunnel
Light-weight Mass-Spring-System (MSS)
4.4 t/m, 18 Hz
Wienerwaldtunnel
Heavy-weight MSS with strip layers
9 t/m, 8 Hz
Wienerwaldtunnel
Heavy-weight MSS with single bearings
9 t/m, 7.5 Hz
Development in Germany
Track Equipment
• Accessible
noise absorbers Section A-A
Guide rail
Track magnet Threaded rod Adapter plate
Compensation plate
Base plate
Elastomeric compensation plate
Elastomeric
Compensation
• Track magnets
plate
Section B-B
• Power rails
Adapter plate
Elastomeric compensation plate
Compensation plate
* MSS … Mass-Spring-System
4.5 E-07
5.2 m
50 m Displacement frequency (dF) 650 mm
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Ramp Indication
(Distance: 650 mm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Plate 1:1200 _A10 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,5 1,1 1,6 2,2 2,7 3,3 3,8
Plate 1:1400 _A09 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,5 0,9 1,4 1,9 2,3 2,8 3,3
Plate 1:1600 _A08 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,4 0,8 1,2 1,5 2 2,4 2,8
Plate 1:1800 _A07 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,4 0,7 1,1 1,4 1,8 2,2 2,5
Plate 1:2150 _A06 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,3 0,6 0,9 1,2 1,5 1,8 2,1
Plate 1:2400 _A05 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,3 0,5 0,8 1,1 1,4 1,6 1,9
Plate 1:2600 _A04 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,3 0,5 0,8 1 1,3 1,5 1,8
Plate 1:2800 _A03 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,2 0,5 0,7 0,9 1,2 1,4 1,6
Plate 1:3000 _A02 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,2 0,4 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,5
Plate 1:3200 _A01 rel. SP High (mm) 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4
Transitions
Ballastless Track – Ballasted Track
Transitions
Ballastless Track vs. Ballasted Track – Germany, Berlin
Section A-A Section B-B Section C-C
65 60 60 60 60 60 regulation plate elastic
regulation plate
auxiliary track baseplate
upper edge
FSS
FSS upper edge of foundation
of foundation
Slab track
Slab track Track base plate 25 components B 320 W60 Ü 44 components 6 components
Track base plate Auxiliary tracks on L=5 m 15.00 m B320 W60 B70 W60 Ballast
HGT 10 m
60 60 60
2.795
2.400
A A B B
65 65
C
Elastically bonded ballast
Transitions
Transitions
Challenge / Objectives