Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
TABLE i
Used' wt. % I Obtained, ~. %
I solvent aqueous phase
MEK toluene water MEK Itoluen~ Water MEK Itoluenelwater
45 45 0 Homogeneous solution
0 45 45 0 99,93 0,07 0 0,06 99,94
45 0 45 88.00 0 12.00 18,60 0 81,40
5 50 45 9,40 90,46 O. 14 0,54 0,06 99,40
lO 45 45 15,55 84,24 0,21 0,84 0,06 99. I0
20 41 39 30,02 65.50 0.48 2,17 0.07 97,76
35 45 20 43,00 56,01 0,99 . 5,00 0,07 94,93
40 37 23 50,00 48,59 1,41 7.12 0,07 92,8 l
50 31 19 59.30 38,30 2,40 9,01 0,07 90,92
64 26 10 68,50 27,59 3,91 12,20 0,08 87,72
80 1l 9 80,9 i l l, 1 l 7.98 I b,24 0,08 83.68
f o o ~ ~ o
o 2g t+g 6g 80 100%
To luene Water
TABLE 2
Temperature [ Coefficient
of equilib- [
rium system~ A
~ !
TABLE 3
Used Obtained
Indexes water solvent I aqueous phase
g a t c h I MEK etOelU
- gatch I MEK ]to lunelwater gatch I MEK !tolueneIwater
The compositions of the equilibrium phases of the MEK-toluene-water system at the tem-
perature of 40~ are reported in Table 1 and the corresponding solubility isotherm is shown
in Fig. i. This system concerns type 2 (Treybal classification [4]) and contains two pairs
of partially miscible liquids. The left branches of the binodal curves in the temperature
range studied are best described by the equation
z , = Aexp(Bxl) (1)
where zz and x z are the concentration of water a n d MEK i n the solvent, wt. %, r e s p e c t i v e l y .
The values of coefficients A and B in Eq. (!) for temperatures of 20-60~ obtained
by processing the data with the method of least squares, are reported in Table 2. Selected
correlation coefficients R are also reported there. Their closeness to one indicates the
satisfactory correlation of the experimental and calculated values of z I. The position of
the tielines (lines connecting the compositions of the equilibrium phases) in the ternary
diagrams is described by the linear logarithmic dependence
105
iog(g,/z2) = A + Blgz~ (2)
where Yl is the concentration of toluene in the solvent, wt. %; z 2 is the concentration of
water in the aqueous phase, wt. %.
The values of coefficients A and B in Eq. (2) and correlation coefficient R for tempera-
tures of 20-60~ are reported in Table 2. The concentration of water z 2 in the equilibrium
aqueous phase as a function of the concentration of toluene Yl in the solvent was determined
with the equation
z~=y,/le+8~g~' (3)
The analysis of the isotherms and data from the laboratory studies showed that changing
the composition of the starting mixtures to an increase in the concentration of toluene and
water results in a decrease in the concentration of moisture in the equilibrium phase of
the solvent. Settling of moist gatch solution (350-420~ fraction) with 20 wt. % petroleum
product and 60 wt. % MEK thus results in a solvent containing 1.47% water (Table 3). Settling
of this gatch solution together with a flooded solvent (15 wt. % for the gatch solution)
permits decreasing the concentration of water to 0.83% in the solvent and 0.68 wt. % in the
gatch solution. In the case of processing high-boiling raw material and using a solvent
with a lower concentration of MEK (40 wt. %), addition of a flooded solvent results in a
decrease in the moisture content to 0.3 wt. %.
In the example examined, more complete elimination of water is ensured by recirculation
of the gatch flow delivered in the amount of 38 wt. % to the starting mixture with a subse-
quent stage of evaporation of the solvent. As Table 3 shows, extraction of MEK from a wet
gatch solution by currents of toluene and petroleum product decreases the solubility of water
in the gatch solution to 0.18 wt~ % and to 0.32 wt. % in the regenerated solvent. Similar
calculations show that in processing of raffinates which boil out within the limits of 420-
490~ in the presence of a solvent containing 50 wt. % MEK, the required amount of recircu-
fating gatch is significantly less and consists of 15 wt. % for products subject to settling.
It is thus recommended that the gatch solution be settled together with the flooded
solvent by feeding the circulating gatch into the settling zone if necessary to bring the
concentration of moisture in the solvent to the "dry" level.
LITERATURE CITED
I. N. M. Shakhova, V. M. Evtushenko, A. P. Grishin, et al., Neftepererab. Neftekhim., No.
3, 8-11 (1986).
. Yu. N. Roshchin, G. P. Vazhnova, and L. P. Shkarupa, ibid., No. 9, 11-12 (1981).
3. A. N. Leonidov, V. V. Ivanova, L. P. Shkarupa et al., ibid., No. 3, 15-17 (1983).
4. R. E. Treybal, Liquid Extraction, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill, New York (1963).
106