Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Instructor:
By
Dr.VAKULA.V.S Sri Harsha.K (10VV1A0251)
Anusha.A (10VV1A0237)
Sai Naveen.V (10VV1A0238)
Sowjanya.G (10VV1A0248)
Kumar Teja.P (10VV1A0212)
CONTENTS
• INTRODUCTION
• ABOUT DG
• COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURE
• GENETIC ALGORITHM
• RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
Objective:
• To improve the behaviour of distributed
network by placing DG.
106
104
102
Total real power losses(KW)
100
98
96
94
92
90
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
DG size(MW)
• In this project, the techniques used in finding the
DG size is performed.
Branch No. Sending end Receiving end R(p.u) X(p.u) Bus No. PD(p.u) QD(p.u)
1 1 2 0.04997 0.06644 1 0 0
11 0.265 0.0949
33-bus data
Optimum 23 7
location of DG
For IEEE-69 bus Radial distribution system
•Results are tabulated and followed to check with 33-bus system also.
1.05
Voltage in (p.u)
1
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Node No
losses
0.35
With DG using GA
Without DG
With DG using sensitivity factor
0.3
Real power loss in (KW)
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Branch No
Observations with 33-bus:
0.98
0.97
Voltage in (p.u)
0.96
0.95
0.94
0.93
0.92
0.91
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Node No
losses
losses for 33-Bus System
40
With DG using Sensitivity factor
Without DG
35 With DG using GA
30
real power loss in (Kw)
25
20
15
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Branch No
Reflections of 69-bus system:
•Fig. shows the 69-bus system with a total real
and reactive power demand is 3802.19 kW and
2694.6 KVAR respectively.
0.99
0.98
0.97
Voltage in (p.u)
0.96
0.95
0.94
Without DG
With DG using Sensitivity factor
0.93 With DG using GA
0.92
0.91
0.9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 121314 151617 181920 212223 242526 272829 303132 333435 363738 394041 424344 454647 484950 515253 545556 575859 606162 636465 666768 69
Node No
losses
50
45
40
Total real power loss in (Kw)
35
30
25
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 1314 1516 17 1819 2021 2223 2425 26 2728 2930 3132 33 3435 3637 3839 4041 42 4344 4546 4748 4950 51 5253 5455 5657 5859 60 6162 6364 6566 67 68
Branch No
Conclusions:
• Without DG real power losses are maximum and voltage profile is poor.
• Once the DG power output exceeded the optimal value, power losses will tend to increase beyond
the minimal value.
• Conventional method is not a big hand with large system but GA can help for extension.
• M.H. Sulaiman1, O. Aliman2 and S.R. Abdul Rahim1,” Optimal Allocation of EG in Distribution System Using Genetic
Algorithm Technique”, Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, ISSN 1934-8975, USA, Jan. 2010, Volume 4, No.1
(Serial No.26)
• N. Acharya, P. Mahat, N. Mithulananthan, “An analyticalapproach for dg allocation in primary distribution network”.Int. J.
Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 669–678, 2006
• Makwana Nirbhaykumar Navinchandra, “Load Flow Analysis Of Radial And Weakly Meshed Distribution System”,
Patiala-147004, July-2012
• Ram Singh1, Gursewak Singh Brar2 and Navdeep Kaur3, “Optimal Placement of DG in Radial DistributionNetwork for
Minimization of Losses”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation
Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue 2, August 2012.
• R.L. Haupt, S.E. Haupt, “Practical Genetic Algorithms,Impact of increasing contribution of dispersed generation on the
power system”, Working Group37.23.New York: Wiley Pub., 1998.CIGRE, 1999.
• Ghosh S., Ghoshal S.P., Ghosh S.,“Optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation in a network system”,
ElectricPower and Energy Systems, Vol.32, pp. 849-856, January 2010.
• Jack Casazza, Frank Delea, “Understanding Electric Power Systems-An Overview Of The Technology And The
Marketplace”, IEEE press understanding science and technolog series, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication-2003
• Khoa T.Q.D., Binh P.T.T., Tran H.B., “Optimizing location and sizing of distributed generation in distribution systems”,
Proceedings of IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition-PSCE 2006, pp. 725-732, October/November 2006.
• Haque M.H,“Efficient load flow method for distribution systems with radial or mesh configuration”, IEE
ProceedingsGeneration, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 143, No. 1, pp.33-38, January 1996.
• Satish kansal1* , B.B.R.Sai2 ,Barjeev Tyagi3 ,Vishal Kumar4 ,”Optimal placement of distributed generation in distribution
netwoks”, International journal of engineering,science and technology Vol. 3,No. 3,2011,pp. 47-55
• C.WangandM. H. Nehrir, “Analytical approaches for optimal placement of distributed generation sources in power
systems,” IEEE Trans Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2068–2076, Nov. 2004.
• Ahmad Memaripour, “Power flow in distribution system with consideration of distributed generation”, International
journal of academic research and applied science (IJARAS)”, ijaras.isair.org, 1(3): 60-67, 2012
• K. Nara, A. Shiose, M. Kitagawa, and T. Ishihara, “Implementation of genetic algorithm for distribution system loss
minimum re-configuration,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1044–1051, Aug. 1992.
• yared tassew, “backward forward sweep method for radial distribution system,” 20 Feb 2013.
• Nattachote Rugthaicharoencheep, Supawud Nedphograw and Srisak Noyraiphoom, “Network Reconfiguration for Loss
Reduction and Improved Voltage Profile in Distribution System with Distributed Generation using Genetic Algorithm”,
Thailand.
• Sarath Bapu R S S, Chandra Prakash V, Dr. S.M.Kannan, “Optimal Capacitor Allocation in 69-bus Radial Distribution
System to Improve Annual Cost Savings for Dynamic Load”, Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2013.
• Illerhaus S.W., Versteg J.S., 2000. “Optimal operation of industrial CHP-based power systems in liberalized energy
markets”, IEEEIndustry Applications Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 901 908.