Sei sulla pagina 1di 9

European Journal of Nutrition

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1638-9

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Modulation by hydroxytyrosol of oxidative stress and antitumor


activities of paclitaxel in breast cancer
Nuri El‑azem1 · Mario Pulido‑Moran1,2 · Cesar L. Ramirez‑Tortosa3 · Jose L. Quiles1,4 · Francisca E. Cara5 ·
Pedro Sanchez‑Rovira6 · Sergio Granados‑Principal1,7 · MCarmen Ramirez‑Tortosa1,2 

Received: 25 October 2017 / Accepted: 13 February 2018


© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Abstract
Purpose  The main objective of this study was to test the therapeutic potential of hydroxytyrosol and its combination with
paclitaxel in breast cancer on oxidative stress status.
Methods  Impact on proliferation rates of different chemotherapy administration patterns was assayed in MCF-7 and MDA-
MB-231 breast cancer cell lines. Breast tumor-bearing rats were randomly assigned to Control, Hydroxytyrosol, Paclitaxel
and Paclitaxel plus hydroxytyrosol groups, for 6 weeks. Tumor volume, cell proliferation and several systemic oxidative
stress parameters were measured. Anti-proliferative activity in vitro experiments was correlated with in vivo experiments.
Results  Combination group did significantly reduce tumor volume when compared with paclitaxel alone. Additionally, the
combination improved the antioxidant status without compromising the antitumor activity of standard chemotherapy.
Conclusion  These findings reveal for the first time that hydroxytyrosol is an active partner in combined therapies with pacli-
taxel against breast cancer. Combination with hydroxytyrosol would also ensure a less oxidative impact of chemotherapeutic
drugs that could potentially improve patient wellness.

Keywords  Breast cancer · Hydroxytyrosol · Cell proliferation · Oxidative stress · Multimodal treatment and paclitaxel

Background women worldwide [3]. Fortunately, mortality rates have


been reduced in the last decade due to the extensive study
Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women, of this disease and the innovation in new treatments and pre-
with an increasing incidence that is widely larger than other vention diagnostics [4, 5]. Incidence rates vary worldwide
ones [1, 2] and is the leading cause of cancer death among depending on sociocultural and nutritional factors, with a
lower incidence in Mediterranean countries, which are tra-
* MCarmen Ramirez‑Tortosa ditionally characterized by a high consumption of vegetables
mramirez@ugr.es and olive oil [6, 7].
Olive oil (OO) is composed mainly by oleic acid, other
1
“José Mataix” Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, fatty acids and by different minor elements such as phenolic
Biomedical Research Centre, Health Sciences Technological
Park, University of Granada, 18016 Armilla, Granada, Spain compounds, flavonoids, lignans or secoiridoids. It has been
2 proposed that the beneficial effects of OO can also be attrib-
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II,
University of Granada, 18016 Armilla, Granada, Spain uted to these minor compounds [8, 9] and not only to oleic
3 acid. Hydroxytyrosol (HT) is the most representative com-
Department of Pathological Anatomy, Hospital Complex
of Jaén, Jaén, Spain ponent of the phenolic group. Many effects have been asso-
4 ciated to HT such as a strong antioxidant ability, antitumor
Department of Physiology, University of Granada, Granada,
Spain properties, antiatherogenic, antimicrobial, antiviral agent,
5 iron chelative, hypolipidemic, antiinflammatory, antithrom-
Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research
Institute, Houston, TX, USA botic, hypoglycemic and has also shown protective effects
6 in rat cardiomyocytes in an ischemia–reperfusion model. In
Oncology Service, Jaen City Hospital, Jaén, Spain
addition, it should be noted that HT intake is safe even at
7
Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, doses of 500 mg/kg/day [10–14].
Houston, TX, USA

13
Vol.:(0123456789)
European Journal of Nutrition

On the other hand, it have been assessed the antitumor 25, 50, 100 µM) (Cayman Chemical) for 72 h. Proliferation
effect of HT both in cancer cell lines [15, 16] and animal rate was determined by adding premixed WST-1 reagent
models [17]. These experiments found that HT was able to (Clontech). After incubation at 37 °C for 4 h, absorbance
inhibit growth and cell proliferation of mammary tumors, was read at 450 nm (reference wavelength 690 nm).
while activating or repressing several genes and pathways
related to cell proliferation and apoptosis. Animal studies
In addition to direct effects over the modulation of path-
ways related to carcinogenesis, HT is a powerful antioxidant Twenty-four female Sprague–Dawley rats (7 weeks old)
able to decrease radical oxygen species (ROS) production (Harlan Interfauna Iberica), were housed under standard
and protect against oxidative damage [9]. These ROS play a laboratory conditions (22 ± 2 °C; 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle
pivotal role in the development of cancer as they are able to and free access to food and water). Mammary tumors were
strongly induce and promote growth and survival of tumor induced as previously reported by Granados-Principal et al.
cells [18]. Moreover, ROS have been identified as the main [17]. Once the tumors reached 1 cm3, the rats were rand-
cause of cardiotoxicity induced by certain chemotherapeutic omized into 4 different groups (n = 6/group) as follows: (1)
drugs in breast cancer treatment. As a consequence, pacli- control (saline + sterile water by gavage), (2) HT (0.5 mg/
taxel (PTX) [19] dosage must be limited and tightly con- kg/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks by gavage) (3) PTX (2 mg/
trolled to avoid the instauration of adverse cardiac effects in kg/week for 6 weeks, i.v.) and (4) PTX-HT: combo group
those patients [19, 20] by a direct interaction between ROS treated with the same doses and timing than HT and PTX
and cardiomyocytes. A reduction in ROS production and its groups. Tumor volume was recorded twice a week. 1 week
levels may prevent or delay the onset of this toxicity, allow- after the last dosage, animals were weighed, anaesthetized
ing a greater exposure time and/or higher doses of the treat- with intraperitoneally administered ketamine (Sigma), and
ment [19, 20]. Furthermore, have also been demonstrated killed by aortic bleeding and thoracotomy. A 21 G needle
that breast cancer patients showing increased systemic anti- was employed for an expert technician to collect whole
oxidant and DNA repair capacities after chemotherapy, reg- blood samples directly from the bifurcation of the aorta
ister significantly improved survival rates in terms of both with a downward direction of the bevel, pulling the plunger
disease relapse and overall survival [21, 22]. enough slowly to collect as much sample as possible with-
For all above described, in this study, the authors have out causing hemolysis and blood clotting. Whole blood was
investigated whether HT could represent a novel compound collected into EDTA containing tube (Vacutainer® EDTA
to be used in the treatment of breast cancer in combina- Tubes BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and centrifuged at 1000×g
tion with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (taxanes) for 15 min to obtain plasma which was aliquoted and frozen
in vivo and in vitro models. Furthermore, HT would be able at − 80 °C until its use. The animals were handled according
to decrease the oxidative damage induced by chemother- to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration, Spanish animal
apy that could improve the patient’s wellness and overall welfare legislation and after the approval of procedures by
survival. the Ethical Committee in Animal Experimentation of the
University of Granada (CEEA 264–2008) (Spain).

Materials and methods Immunohistochemistry

Cell culture and proliferation For immunohistochemical techniques, tumor sections were


deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded
Estrogen receptor positive (MCF-7) and triple negative alcohols to water. Antigen retrieval was performed with the
(MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells lines were purchased PTLink module (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) using Dako
from American Type Culture Collection. Cells were grown low-pH Antigen Retrieval fluid (Dako) followed by several
in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine washes in water before being placed onto an Autostainer
serum (ThermoScientific) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic Plus Link (Dako) where the remainder of the immunohis-
(Gibco) at 37 °C with 5% ­CO2. The cell lines were not tested tochemical staining was performed using Envision FLEX
or authenticated over and above documentation provided by (Dako). Briefly, sections were first placed in washing buffer
the ATCC, which includes antigen expression, DNA profile, followed by blockade of endogenous peroxidase with 3%
short tandem repeat profiling, and cytogenic analysis. Cell hydrogen peroxide for 5 min. Then, primary antibody Ki-67
proliferation was assessed with the WST-1 method assay. (Clone SP6, Máster Diagnóstica, Granada, Spain) was
Briefly, cells were plated at a density of 2 × 103 cells/well applied for 20 min, followed by another buffer wash, and
in a 96-well plate and treated with PTX (0,1, 2.5, 5, 10 nM) visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine for 10 min. Following
(Teva Pharmaceuticals) alone or combined with HT (0, 10, a water wash, sections were counterstained in hematoxylin

13
European Journal of Nutrition

for 7 min, washed in water, dehydrated, and cover-slipped. triplicate for each assay condition. In addition, all experi-
The results were compared to negative controls to eliminate ment were carried out at least five times.
false positives. Tissues were blindly evaluated by a pathol-
ogist. Ki-67 proliferation was assessed from at least 1000
tumor cells. The most peripheral tumor areas were selected Results
as they constitute front infiltration of the neoplastic.
Effect of PTX in combination with HT on tumor cell
Alkaline comet assay proliferation
Alkaline comet assay was used to measure the DNA dam- It was assessed the effects of HT, both alone and in combina-
age in isolated plasma lymphocytes as previously described tion with different concentrations of PTX on the proliferation
[23]. Briefly, cells were incubated in lysis buffer for 1 h, and rates of MCF-7 (Fig. 1a) and MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 1b) cell
subjected to alkaline DNA unwinding for 40 min. After elec- lines for 72 h. HT alone was able to significantly decrease
trophoresis, the nucleoids were stained with 4′,6-Diamidino- cell proliferation in MCF-7 at 50 µM and dramatically at
2-phenylindol dihydrochloride (Sigma) and scored using a 100 µM doses (Fig. 1a). In MDA-MB-231 cells, cell pro-
Leica DMLS fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsys- liferation decreased at all doses (10, 25, 50, and 100 µM)
tems). One hundred comets from each gel were scored using (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1b). MDA-MB-231 cells were also more
computerized image analysis (Komet 3.0; Kinetic Imaging sensitive to PTX treatment alone (5 and 10 nM), and the
Ltd.) and the percentages of fluorescence in the comet tail combination of HT (100 µM) and PTX led to a significant
(representing the fraction of DNA in the tail), head (rep- reduction in cell proliferation (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1b).
resenting the fraction of DNA in the head) and Olive Tail
Moment (OTM) (indicating the smallest detectable size of
migrating DNA and the number of relaxed/broken pieces) Combination of HT with PTX on tumor growth
were measured. in a rat model of breast cancer

Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and protein Based on in vitro data, it was next investigated whether
oxidative damage combination of HT with PTX was able to reduce tumor vol-
ume in a breast cancer rodent model to ascertain the results
TAC was assessed using the method described by Vera et al. in cells. Daily injections of HT in combination with PTX
[22]. To determine it, the aliquoted plasma samples were (2 mg/kg/week) were given to breast tumor-bearing rats for
gradually thawed and only once defrosted. The results were 6 weeks. Tumor growth was decreased in HT alone, PTX,
expressed as µM Trolox. and very substantially in the combination group (Fig. 2a,
Plasma levels of protein carbonyl groups were assessed p < 0.001).
using Protein Carbonyl Kit (Cayman Chemical), according Consistent with in vitro results, it was observed reduced
to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total protein concentra- tumor growth in PTX-HT group compared to PTX group
tion in the plasma samples was measured using Biuret Col- throughout the experiment (Fig.  2a, p < 0.001). Conse-
orimetric Assay Kit (Spinreact). The results were expressed quently, it was correlated these results with tumor cell
as nmol of carbonyl proteins per mg of total proteins in proliferation by immunohistochemistry (Ki-67). Lower
plasma. proliferation levels were found in HT alone and PTX-HT
groups compared to the control and to PTX groups (Fig. 2b,
Statistical analysis p < 0.05). PTX group exhibited higher percentage of pro-
liferating cells that was efficiently decreased by the com-
Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for bined treatment with HT (Fig. 2b, p < 0.05). HT per se could
Windows Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). decrease cell proliferation at the same level as combined
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance group. Overall, these results demonstrate that HT did not
between two groups was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s alter the effectiveness of standard chemotherapeutic drugs.
t test. Experiments with more than three groups were ana- Moreover, it has an evident effect when it is combined with
lyzed with one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) followed PTX in vivo.
by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. Statistical analysis of tumor
volume and differences between combination groups in vitro Impact on oxidative status
was assessed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post-
hoc test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered as sig- To assess whether co-treatment with HT is able to
nificant. Tumor cells lines experiments were performed in decrease the oxidative stress induced by chemotherapy,

13
European Journal of Nutrition

Fig. 1  Effects of different con-


centrations of paclitaxel (0, 1,
2.5, 5 and 10 nM) in combina-
tion with different concentra-
tions of hydroxytyrosol (HT)
(0, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µM) on
cell proliferation in MCF-7
(a) and MDA-MB-231 (b)
cell lines. Data are expressed
as the mean ± SEM. Bars not
sharing superscripts letters are
statistically different (p < 0.05)
for each concentrations of
paclitaxel

DNA damage was measured in isolated lymphocytes, as to decrease the oxidation of protein compared to PTX
well as antioxidant markers in plasma. group (p < 0.05).
Alkaline comet assay was employed to investigate DNA
damage in lymphocytes that is depicted herein as OTM
(Fig. 3). The results show that HT alone caused the low-
est DNA damage level. PTX did not cause an additional Discussion
increase in DNA damage compared to control. PTX-HT
group exhibited a lower level of DNA damage compared to Current pharmacological treatments for breast cancer consist
control group and a slight downward trend facing to PTX. highly effective drugs that are able to reduce tumor volume
Plasma TAC (Fig. 4) was measured using the ABTS but with several important side effects that could compro-
assay. It was found that both HT combined with PTX and mise patient wellness. Indeed, it have previously been shown
HT alone did significantly increase the plasma antioxi- that breast cancer patients experience high levels of DNA,
dant capacity compared to PTX group (Fig. 4, p < 0.05), protein and lipid oxidative damage, which are sustained
although they did not show significant differences with along different clinical interventions, including the adminis-
control group. However, PTX combined with HT showed tration of anthracyclines and taxanes as part of their chemo-
levels of TAC significantly higher than PTX group. therapeutic treatment [21, 22]. In terms of toxicity derived
In relation to protein carbonyls (Fig. 5), the combined from overproduction of ROS, PTX induces the production
treatment of HT with PTX decreased protein carbonyls of ROS [24] through a yet unknown mechanism, but it is
levels significantly (p < 0.05) compared to PTX group. believed that it could increase mitochondrial permeability
However, HT group showed significantly a high capacity and ROS formation in a similar way as docetaxel [25].

13
European Journal of Nutrition

Fig. 2  Progress of the trucut mammary tumor volume during the are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance is indicated as
experimental times (6 weeks) and cell proliferation (Ki67) in a rat symbols (†differences between control group and treatment groups,
model of breast cancer. Differences between control, HT, PTX and p < 0.001) and (*differences among the treatment groups, p < 0.05).
PTX + HT group (n = 6 per group) (a). Percentage of Ki-67 positive HT hydroxytyrosol (n = 6), PTX paclitaxel (n = 6), PTX-HT paclitaxel
cells in control, HT, PTX and PTX + HT groups of rats (n = 6) with plus hydroxytyrosol. Bars for cell proliferation not sharing super-
experimental breast cancers at the end of the treatments (b). Results scripts letters are statistically different, p < 0.05

HT has been recently emerging as a promising agent 28] are widely known. Nonetheless, there is lack of studies
against breast cancer due to the high antitumor activity showing potential effect of HT in breast cancer models.
both in vitro [26, 27] and in vivo models [17, 28]. Addi- Trying to unscramble the antiproliferative character, it
tionally, HT has been extensively studied as a powerful was observed how HT per se was able to decrease the per-
antioxidant [9] that could help to ameliorate the high oxi- centage of growth both MCF-7 cells and MDA-MB-231 at
dative damage induced by chemotherapeutics [29]. To the 50 µM and 100 µM. It is essential to note that when HT was
best of our knowledge, this is the first report studying the combined at 100 µM, the largest decrease of proliferation
effect of HT in combination with standard chemotherapeu- was obtained (Fig. 1a).
tic (PTX) using in vitro and in vivo models of breast can- Similarly, in MDA-MB-231 cells, when HT is combined
cer. Antitumor effects of HT in breast, thyroid and colon at 100 µM with PTX 5 nM, is again achieved better anti-
cell lines [27, 30] and in vivo models of breast cancer [17, proliferative effect than if only PTX were used (Fig. 1b).A

13
European Journal of Nutrition

Fig. 3  DNA damage of isolated 1.2


lymphocytes of experimental c
breast cancer rats (n = 6 per
group) treated with PTX, HT 1

Olive Tail Moment


or their combination specified
bc
as OTM. Data are expressed
as mean ± SEM. Statistical 0.8
significances: bars not sharing
superscripts letters are statisti- b
cally different p < 0.05. HT 0.6
hydroxytyrosol, OTM Olive tail
moment, PTX paclitaxel, PTX-
HT paclitaxel plus hydroxyty- 0.4
a
rosol
0.2

0
CONTROL HT PTX PTX-HT

Fig. 4  Total antioxidant capac-


ity (TAC) of plasma from
experimental breast cancer rats
(n = 6 per group) treated with
PTX, HT or their combination
specified as µM of Trolox. Data
are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Bars not sharing superscripts
letters are statistically different,
p < 0.05. HT hydroxytyrosol,
PTX paclitaxel, PTX-HT pacli-
taxel plus hydroxytyrosol

Fig. 5  Proteins oxidation deter- 1 b


mined as plasma protein carbon-
yls levels in rats with experi- 0.9
mental breast cancer (n = 6 per
Protein Carbonyls (nmol/mg)

group) treated with PTX, HT 0.8 ab


and their combination. Data are 0.7 ab
expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Bars not sharing superscripts 0.6 a
letters are statistically different
(p < 0.05). HT hydroxytyrosol, 0.5
PTX paclitaxel, PTX-HT pacli- 0.4
taxel plus hydroxytyrosol
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
CONTROL HT PTX PTX-HT

13
European Journal of Nutrition

strong point in favor of HT was the large decrease produced good. More recent studies with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
on tumor volume (most of all) when was associated to PTX, and treatment with taxanes showed that a lot of tumours with
showing a good agreement with the previously detailed in medium pathological response decreased the tumor volume
in vitro studies and now supported by a reduced proliferation but the proliferative index measured as Ki-67 did not change
rate, well below the control and PTX groups and at the same or even increased after the treatment compared with its basal
level as the HT alone. This enhanced On the other hand, the value [35]. All described above is in according with our
breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (estrogen receptor positive) results where the proliferative index in rat with experimental
has more effected with HT (100 µM) alone or combined with breast cancer was the same than in control group. As has
PTX than the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 (triple been demonstrated by Enomoto et al. [36] and Diaz-Botero
negative). These evidences are in according with Sirianni et al. [37] these results show a bad prognostic although in
et al. (2010) [31]. These authors demonstrated that HT can our study this effect is eliminated by the HT mechanism of
have a chemopreventive role in breast cancer cell prolifera- action.
tion through the inhibition of rapid signals dependent on Overall, these results demonstrate for the first time that
estrogen involved in uncontrolled tumor cell growth. HT is able to enhance the antitumor capacity of chemothera-
Based on these results, it was attempted to demonstrate peutic drugs in breast cancer provoked in rats with DMBA
whether this effect was equal or similar when animal vari- which produced estrogen receptor positive tumor. Due to
ables were introduced, such that all normal biological pro- the ethical difficulties to try HT as a unique antitumor drug
cesses may act together over HT and vice versa. All the in future clinical trials, must be highlighted its great effect
rats developed with DMBA breast cancer with expression during the treatment against breast cancer, promoting a
of estrogen receptor in according to Alvarado et al. [32] decrease in adverse effects associated to conventional anti-
study and after 6 weeks of treatment in Sprague–Dawley tumor drugs.
rats, both tumor volume (Fig. 2a) and cell proliferation (by Seeking answers to whether the antioxidant character
Ki-67) (Fig. 2b) were evaluated. It was found how HT and of HT, when combined with PTX exerted the same effect,
PTX produced a smaller tumor volume than control which it was found that this association, although DNA damage
was increasing over time, as obviously expected the initial expressed as OTM levels (Fig. 3) did not decrease to the
idea of antitumor character of the HT and its great effect same levels as HT (the lowest), it was done regarding the
when is associated to conventional highly toxic chemother- control group, and shows a clear downward trend compared
apy, even in animals where all biological aspects and pos- to PTX alone, which made it easier to think that if PTX
sible interactions come into play. In this sense, our finding produced greater damage to DNA, by associating with HT
are in accordance with [33] where HT inhibited the cancer there was an improvement in the results. Maybe they were
cell growth via Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) together mitigating the adverse effects related to high levels
at the same level than other conventional drugs, showing a of oxidative stress which can promote several deleterious
possible cooperation mechanism as well as the beneficial effects, thus avoiding genetic instability and mutations that
character of the association of HT and other anticancer affect the control of cell [38], neurodegenerative disorders
drugs without compromising the antitumor activity. These [39], diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, or metabolic syn-
results are perfectly correlated with lower tumor cell prolif- drome [40], associated at least in part to PTX.
eration, expressed as percentage of Ki-67, in PTX-HT and These data were supported further by observing a similar
HT groups compared to PTX or control groups as showed pattern in plasma TAC (Fig. 4). HT had the highest levels,
the Fig. 2b. even compared to the control group that, as other studies
The association between proliferative index and tumor showed, tumors themselves promote a heightened state own
growth is well established. Tumors with high Ki-67 expres- body’s defense against the ROS generated by pathology
sion increase more than tumors with low Ki-67 expression. [21, 22]. PTX had the lowest antioxidant capacity values,
However, the relation proliferative index/tumor growth is similar as occur in [41] and once again, associating HT,
different when the tumors have received chemotherapy. improved results as a greater possibility of plasma antioxi-
Burcombe et al. [34] have described that in median day-21, dant response. If higher levels of plasma TAC imply a lower
Ki-67 was higher in pathological responders (30.3 versus oxidative damage to different biological structures and mol-
14.1%, p = 0.046) and there were no association between ecules [42], this gave points in favor of the possibility that
pathological response and changes in Ki-67 throughout the HT palliate the side effects associated to PTX.
study period, in patients with breast cancer in neoadjuvant All together allow to elucidate that are not isolated or
chemotherapy. Moreover, the reduction in Ki-67 index after random results, HT combined has the ability to improve the
one cycle of treatment was not sustained and was often fol- response to the ROS produced by chemotherapeutic further
lowed by a rebound increase in cell proliferation by the time enhancing its antitumor and antiproliferative effects, improv-
of surgery although the clinic-pathological responses were ing the antioxidant capacity and most importantly, without

13
European Journal of Nutrition

countering any effect, as occurring with other antioxidants identifies a set of genes driving breast cancer chemoresistance.
tested as resveratrol [43] or quercetin [44]. PLoS One 8(1):e53983
5. Wu X, Ye Y, Barcenas CH, Chow W-H, Meng QH, Chavez-
These unbalanced ROS levels also affect to proteins. As MacGregor M, Hildebrandt MAT, Zhao H, Gu X, Deng Y,
has been shown in Fig. 5, protein carbonyls levels were a Wagar E, Esteva FJ, Tripathy D, Hortobagyi GN (2017) Person-
similar pattern than OTM parameter. These results are in alized prognostic prediction models for breast cancer recurrence
according with Panis et al. (2012) [41] and Pulido-Moran and survival incorporating multidimensional data. J Natl Cancer
Inst 109(7). https​://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw31​4
et al. (2018) [45]. Moreover, when HT and PTX were com- 6. Buckland G, Gonzalez CA (2015) The role of olive oil in dis-
bined, there were significant differences with PTX group, ease prevention: a focus on the recent epidemiological evidence
thanks to HT effect. from cohort studies and dietary intervention trials. Br J Nutr
In conclusion, considering all above, it can be generally 113(Suppl 2):S94-101
7. Rodriguez-Morato J, Xicota L, Fito M, Farre M, Dierssen M,
concluded that HT shows the best results due to its decreased de la Torre R (2015) Potential role of olive oil phenolic com-
cell proliferation and increased capacity for an antioxidant pounds in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. Mol-
response thanks to enhance all defense systems against ROS, ecules 20(3):4655–4680
something that favor the reduction of damage to lipids, pro- 8. Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Ochoa-
Herrera J, Perez-Lopez P, Pulido-Moran M, Ramirez-Tortosa
teins and nucleic acids in breast cancer with expression of MC (2012) Squalene ameliorates atherosclerotic lesions through
estrogen receptors. Since it would be unethical use as a sin- the reduction of CD36 scavenger receptor expression in mac-
gle compound for a future therapy in humans, it is combined rophages. Mol Nutr Food Res 56(5):733–740
with other chemotherapeutic agents as paclitaxel which by 9. Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Sanchez-
Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa MC (2010) Hydroxytyrosol: from
themselves generate a very high redox imbalance, promoting laboratory investigations to future clinical trials. Nutr Rev
damage to all macromolecules of both tumor and nontumor 68(4):191–206
cells. Therefore, this association compensates the adverse 10. Arunsundar M, Shanmugarajan TS, Ravichandran V (2015)
effects linked to chemotherapeutics as Paclitaxel. HT even 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol attenuates spatio-cognitive defi-
cits in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model: modulation of
allows lower doses of chemotherapy, reducing the associated the molecular signals in neuronal survival-apoptotic programs.
toxic effects, without losing effectiveness. Neurotox Res 27(2):143–155. https​: //doi.org/10.1007/s1264​
0-014-9492-x
Acknowledgements  This research was supported by Grants from 11. Catalan U, Rubio L, Lopez de Las Hazas M-C, Herrero P, Nadal P,
Excelentísima Diputación de Jaén, CEAS Foundation 30.C0.244500 Canela N, Pedret A, Motilva M-J, Sola R (2016) Hydroxytyrosol
and Junta de Andalucía PI-0210/2007. and its complex forms (secoiridoids) modulate aorta and heart
proteome in healthy rats: Potential cardio-protective effects. Mol
Nutr Food Res 60(10):2114–2129
Compliance with ethical standards  12. Medina-Martinez MS, Truchado P, Castro-Ibanez I, Allende A
(2016) Antimicrobial activity of hydroxytyrosol: a current con-
Ethical standards  Manuscript submitted for publication has been troversy. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80(4):801–810
approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have, therefore, been 13. Warleta F, Quesada CS, Campos M, Allouche Y, Beltran G, Gafo-
performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the rio JJ (2011) Hydroxytyrosol protects against oxidative DNA dam-
1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. age in human breast cells. Nutrients 3(10):839–857
14. Zheng A, Li H, Cao K, Xu J, Zou X, Li Y, Chen C, Liu J, Feng Z
Conflict of interest  The authors have declared no conflict of interest. (2015) Maternal hydroxytyrosol administration improves neuro-
genesis and cognitive function in prenatally stressed offspring. J
Nutr Biochem 26(2):190–199
15. Nogueira V, Park Y, Chen C-C, Xu P-Z, Chen M-L, Tonic I,
Unterman T, Hay N (2008) Akt determines replicative senescence
References and oxidative or oncogenic premature senescence and sensitizes
cells to oxidative apoptosis. Cancer Cell 14(6):458–470
16. Notarnicola M, Pisanti S, Tutino V, Bocale D, Rotelli MT, Gentile
1. Gomez SL, Von Behren J, McKinley M, Clarke CA, Shariff- A, Memeo V, Bifulco M, Perri E, Caruso MG (2011) Effects of
Marco S, Cheng I, Reynolds P, Glaser SL (2017) Breast cancer in olive oil polyphenols on fatty acid synthase gene expression and
Asian Americans in California, 1988–2013: increasing incidence activity in human colorectal cancer cells. Genes Nutr 6(1):63–69
trends and recent data on breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer 17. Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa C, Camacho-
Res Treat 164(1):139–147 Corencia P, Sanchez-Rovira P, Vera-Ramirez L, Ramirez-Tortosa
2. Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson B, MC (2011) Hydroxytyrosol inhibits growth and cell proliferation
Mariotto A, Lake AJ, Wilson R, Sherman RL, Anderson RN, and promotes high expression of sfrp4 in rat mammary tumours.
Henley SJ, Kohler BA, Penberthy L, Feuer EJ, Weir HK (2017) Mol Nutr Food Res 55(Suppl 1):S117–S126
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975– 18. Jezierska-Drutel A, Rosenzweig SA, Neumann CA (2013) Role of
2014, Featuring Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(9). https​://doi. oxidative stress and the microenvironment in breast cancer devel-
org/10.1093/jnci/djx03​0 opment and progression. Adv Cancer Res 119:107–125
3. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) 19. Castel M, Despas F, Modesto A, Gales C, Honton B, Galinier M,
Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90 Senard J-M, Pathak A (2013) [Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapies].
4. Vera-Ramirez L, Sanchez-Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Quiles Effets indesirables cardiaques des chimiotherapies. Presse Med
JL, Ramirez-Tortosa M, Lorente JA (2013) Transcriptional shift 42(1):26–39

13
European Journal of Nutrition

20. Granados-Principal S, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Sanchez- 32. Alvarado A, Lopes AC, Faustino-Rocha AI, Cabrita AMS, Fer-
Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa MC (2010) New advances in molecular reira R, Oliveira PA, Colaco B (2017) Prognostic factors in MNU
mechanisms and the prevention of adriamycin toxicity by antioxi- and DMBA-induced mammary tumors in female rats. Pathol Res
dant nutrients. Food Chem Toxicol 48(6):1425–1438 Pract 213(5):441–446
21. Vera-Ramirez L, Sanchez-Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, Ram- 33. Terzuoli E, Nannelli G, Frosini M, Giachetti A, Ziche M, Donnini
irez-Tortosa CL, Granados-Principal S, Fernandez-Navarro M, S (2017) Inhibition of cell cycle progression by the hydroxyty-
Lorente JA, Quiles JL (2011) Does chemotherapy-induced oxi- rosol–cetuximab combination yields enhanced chemotherapeutic
dative stress improve the survival rates of breast cancer patients? efficacy in colon cancer cells. Oncotarget 8(47):83207–88322
Antioxid Redox Signal 15(4):903–909 34. Burcombe R, Wilson G, Dowsett M, Khan I, Richman P, Daley
22. Vera-Ramirez L, Sanchez-Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, Ram- F, Detre S, Makris A (2006) Evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation
irez-Tortosa CL, Granados-Principal S, Lorente JA, Quiles JL and apoptotic index before, during and after neoadjuvant chemo-
(2012) Oxidative stress status in metastatic breast cancer patients therapy for primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 8:R31
receiving palliative chemotherapy and its impact on survival rates. 35. Tokuda E, Horimoto Y, Arakawa A, Himuro T, Senuma K, Nakai
Free Radic Res 46(1):2–10 K, Saito M (2017) Differences in Ki67 expressions between pre-
23. Varela-Lopez A, Ochoa JJ, Llamas-Elvira JM, Lopez-Frias M, and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy specimens might predict
Planells E, Ramirez-Tortosa M, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Giampieri early recurrence of breast cancer. Hum Pathol 63:40–45
F, Battino M, Quiles JL (2017) Age-related loss in bone mineral 36. Enomoto Y, Morimoto T, Nishimukai A, Higuchi T, Yanai A,
density of rats fed lifelong on a fish oil-based diet is avoided by Miyagawa Y, Murase K, Imamura M, Takatsuka Y, Nomura T,
coenzyme Q10 addition. Nutrients 9(2):pii: E176. https​://doi. Takeda M, Watanabe T, Hirota S, Miyoshi Y (2016) Impact of
org/10.3390/nu902​0176 biomarker changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical
24. Vera-Ramirez L, Ramirez-Tortosa M, Perez-Lopez P, Granados- response in patients with residual breast cancers. Int J Clin Oncol
Principal S, Battino M, Quiles JL (2012) Long-term effects of 21:254–261
systemic cancer treatment on DNA oxidative damage: the poten- 37. Diaz-Botero S, Espinosa-Bravo M, Gonçalves VR, Esgueva-
tial for targeted therapies. Cancer Lett 327(1–2):134–141 Colmenarejo A, Peg V, Perez J, Cortes J (2016) Rubio IT. Differ-
25. McCormick B, Lowes DA, Colvin L, Torsney C, Galley HF (2016) ent prognostic implications of residual disease after neoadjuvant
MitoVitE, a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant, limits paclitaxel- treatment: impact of Ki 67 and site of response. Ann Surg Oncol
induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in vitro, and 23:3831–3837
paclitaxel-induced mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat pain 38. Jorgenson TC, Zhong W, Oberley TD (2013) Redox imbalance
model. Br J Anaesth 117(5):659–666 and biochemical changes in cancer. Cancer Res 73(20):6118–6123
26. Sarsour EH, Goswami M, Kalen AL, Lafin JT, Goswami PC 39. Jimenez-Del-Rio M, Velez-Pardo C (2012) The bad, the good,
(2014) Hydroxytyrosol inhibits chemokine C-C motif ligand 5 and the ugly about oxidative stress. Oxid Med Cell Longev
mediated aged quiescent fibroblast-induced stimulation of breast 2012:163913
cancer cell proliferation. Age (Dordr) 36(3):9645 40. Khan SR (2012) Is oxidative stress, a link between nephrolithi-
27. Toteda G, Lupinacci S, Vizza D, Bonofiglio R, Perri E, Bonofiglio asis and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease,
M, Lofaro D, La Russa A, Leone F, Gigliotti P, Cifarelli RA, metabolic syndrome? Urol Res 40(2):95–112
Perri A (2017) High doses of hydroxytyrosol induce apoptosis in 41. Panis C, Herrera ACSA., Victorino VJ, Campos FC, Freitas LF,
papillary and follicular thyroid cancer cells. J Endocrinol Invest De Rossi T, Colado Simao AN, Cecchini AL, Cecchini R (2012)
40(2):153–162 Oxidative stress and hematological profiles of advanced breast
28. Granados-Principal S, El-Azem N, Pamplona R, Ramirez-Tortosa cancer patients subjected to paclitaxel or doxorubicin chemo-
C, Pulido-Moran M, Vera-Ramirez L, Quiles JL, Sanchez-Rovira therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(1):89–97
P, Naudi A, Portero-Otin M, Perez-Lopez P, Ramirez-Tortosa M 42. Barnett LE, Broomfield AM, Hendriks WH, Hunt MB, McGhie
(2014) Hydroxytyrosol ameliorates oxidative stress and mitochon- TK (2007) The in vivo antioxidant action and the reduction of
drial dysfunction in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats oxidative stress by boysenberry extract is dependent on base diet
with breast cancer. Biochem Pharmacol 90(1):25–33 constituents in rats. J Med Food 10(2):281–289
29. Rosignoli P, Fuccelli R, Sepporta MV, Fabiani R (2016) In vitro 43. Fukui M, Yamabe N, Zhu BT (2010) Resveratrol attenuates the
chemo-preventive activities of hydroxytyrosol: the main phe- anticancer efficacy of paclitaxel in human breast cancer cells
nolic compound present in extra-virgin olive oil. Food Funct in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Cancer 46(10):1882–1891
7(1):301–307 44. Marone M, D’Andrilli G, Das N, Ferlini C, Chatterjee S, Scambia
30. Cardeno A, Sanchez-Hidalgo M, Rosillo MA, Alarcon de la Las- G (2001) Quercetin abrogates taxol-mediated signaling by inhibit-
tra C (2013) Oleuropein, a secoiridoid derived from olive tree, ing multiple kinases. Exp Cell Res 270(1):1–12
inhibits the proliferation of human colorectal cancer cell through 45. Robles-Almazan M, Pulido-Moran M, Moreno Fernandez J, Ram-
downregulation of HIF-1alpha. Nutr Cancer 65(1):147–156 irez-Tortosa C, Rodriguez-Garcia C, Quiles JL, Ramirez-Tortosa
31. Sirianni R, Chimento A, De Luca A, Casaburi I, Rizza P, Onofrio MC (2018) Hydroxytyrosol: Bioavailability, toxicity and clinical
A, Iacopetta D, Puoci F, Ando S, Maggiolini M, Pezzi V (2010) applications. Food Res Int 2018(105):654–667
Oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol inhibit MCF-7 breast cancer cell
proliferation interfering with ERK1/2 activation. Mol Nutr Food
Res 54(6):833–840

13

Potrebbero piacerti anche