Abella 64.33578102 2. Magtajas v. Pryce (G.R. No.

111097, July 20, 1994)

Alcoran 60.94087096 1. Victorias Milling Co. v. SSC (G.R. No. L-16704, March 17, 1962)

Amodia 32.36161892 1. Gamboa v. Finance Secretary (G.R. No. 176579, June 28, 2011)

Ang 46.03272527 1. Lambino v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 174153, October 25, 2006)

Aranjuez 51.83274733 1. Tañada v. Tuvera (136 SCRA 27)

Ballos 72.96001478 2. Llamado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989)

Batacan 20.20265367 4. Ordillo v. COMELEC (192 SCRA 100

Cameros 42.91341473 1. Orceo v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 190779, March 26, 2010)

Castillo 91.19945898 1. Luz Farms v. Secretary of DAR (192 SCRA 51)

Clarabal 97.56816226 1. Umali v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 203974, April 22, 2014)

Corotan 1.014144715 3. Imbong v. Ochoa (G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014)

Corpuz 26.49367461 1. Central Bank Employees Association v. Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (G.R. No. 148208, December 15, 2004)

Crespo 50.67211788 2. Reman Enterprises, Inc. v. Professional Regulatory Board of Real Estate Service (G.R. No. 197676, February 4, 2014)

Cullo 40.29118162 2. Gutierrez v. House of Representatives Committee on Justice (G.R. No. 193459, February 15, 2011)

Dacera 75.44293547 1. De Castro v. JBC (G. R. No. 191002)

Delfin 97.32094137 3. China Bank v. Ortega (49 SCRA 335)

Diocera 2.350331178 4. Gamboa v. Finance Sec. (G.R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012)

Ebuen 64.59794504 3. Primicias v. Urdaneta (93 SCRA 462)

Espinosa 88.61293284 3. Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary (194 SCRA 317)

Galas 55.86067446 1. Jadewell Parking Systems Corp. v. Hon. Lidua (G.R. No. 169588, October 7, 2013)

Galope 98.10578664 2. La Bugal-B’laan Tribal Assocciation, Inc. v. Ramos (G.R. No. 127882, January 27, 2004)

Gonzaga 41.97082105 5. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS (G.R. No. 122156, February 3, 1997)

Gulanes 61.73476975 1. RMBSA v. HDMF (333 SCRA 777)

Hermano 86.01511825 1. Gamboa v. Finance Sec. (G.R. No. 176579)

Jimenea 40.82342371 4. Tañada v. Angara (G.R. No. 118295, May 2, 1997)

Ko 53.39799994 2. Tañada v. Tuvera (146 SCRA 446)

Layog 62.90052775 2. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481)

Mabang 66.79270356 4. Bagatsing v. Ramirez (74 SCRA 306)

Mamalo 77.13509911 1. United States v. Serapio (23 Phil. 584)

Mangui-ob 68.32830018 1. People v. Echavez (95 SCRA 663)

Name Random Num Case Assignment

Ostan 15.39418015 2. Umali v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 203974, April 22, 2014)

Paracale 63.41291544 1. Solicitor General v MMA (G.R. No. 102782, December 11, 1991)

Payot 85.61118095 3. Schneckenburger v. Moran (G.R. No. L-44896, July 31, 1936) & Dissenting Opinion

Raz 19.02364092 3. Paras v. COMELEC (264 SCRA 49)

Rizalda 40.77426217 3. Agabon v. NLRC (G.R. No. 158693, November 17, 2004)

Roche 86.33841017 2. Aquino v. COMELEC (62 SCRA 275)

Saus 91.1138154 4. Poe-Llamanzares v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 221697, March 8, 2016)

Seruela 95.76388241 2. Montejo v. COMELEC (242 SCRA 415)

Somcio 73.53597174 1. Kare v. Platon (G.R. No. L-35902, October 28, 1931)

Suelto 9.558249093 5. Narra Nickel Mining and Development Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp. (G.R. No. 195580, April 21, 2014)

Velez 83.37888396 2. U.S. v. De Guzman (30 Phil. 416)

Zorilla 11.50329155 1. Tawang Multipurpose Cooperative v. La Trinidad Water District (G.R. No. 166471, March 22, 2011)
I. General Principles

a. PH Legal System

b. Definition of Statutory Construction

1. Caltex vs Palomar 18 SCRA 247

c. Importance of Statutory Construction

d. Are construction and interpretation the same?

e. Object and Purpose

f. Legislative Intent

1. Airsporna v. CA 113 SCRA 459

2. China Bank v. Ortega 49 SCRA 355

3. PVA Board v. Bautista 112 SCRA 59

g. Nature of the Rules of Statutory Construction

1. PCFI v. NTC GR No. L-63318 J. Abad Dissent

h. Propriety of Construction

1. NFL v. Eisma 127 SCRA 419

2. Paat v. CA 266 SCRA 167

3. People v. Mapa 20 SCRA 1164

4. Leveriza v. IAC 157 SCRA 282

5. Daoang v. Municipal Judge 159 SCRA 369

6. Paras v. COMELEC 264 SCRA 49

i. Power to Construe as a Judicial Function

1. Perfecto v. Meer 85 Phil 552

2. Endencia v. David 93 Phil 696

3. Nitafan v. CIR 152 SCRA 284

II. Statutory Construction v. Judicial Legislation

a. Principle of Separation of Powers

b. Overlap of Government Functions

c. Status of SC Rulings

d. What is Judicial Legislation?

1. Floresca v. Philex Mining 136 SCRA 142

III. Subjects of Construction

a. The Constitution

i. Primary Purpose

ii. How the Constitution should be construed

1. Plain meaning

2. Intent of the framers

3. Interpretation as a whole

4. Cases
a. Sarmiento v. Mison (156 SCRA 549)

b. Francisco v. House of Representatives (G.R. No. 160261, November 10, 2003

i. Majority decision
c. Chavez v. JBC (G.R. No. 202242, July 17, 2012) ii. J. Abad dissenting opinion

d. Chavez v. JBC (G.R. No. 202242, April 16, 2013)

e. Macalintal v. PET (G.R. No. 191618, November 23, 2010)

iii. Role of the Preamble

1. Aglipay v. Ruiz (64 Phil. 201)

2. Estrada v. Escritor (A.M. No. P-02-1651) August 4, 2003 and June 22, 2006 decisions 1

3. Imbong v. Ochoa (G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014) 2

4. Gamboa v. Finance Sec. (G.R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012) 3

5. Narra Nickel Mining and Development Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp. (G.R. No. 195580, April 21, a.
2014)
J. Leonen dissenting opinion 4

iv. Principle of Constitutional Supremacy

1. Tawang Multipurpose Cooperative v. La Trinidad Water District (G.R. No. 166471, March 22, 2011) 5

2. Umali v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 203974, April 22, 2014) 6 26

3. Paras v. COMELEC (264 SCRA 49) 7

4. Ordillo v. COMELEC (192 SCRA 100 8

v. Principle of Relative Unconstitutionality

1. Central Bank Employees Association v. Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (G.R. No. 148208, December 15, 2004)

vi. Self-executing v. Need for Implementing Legislation

1. Gamboa v. Finance Secretary (G.R. No. 176579, June 28, 2011)

2. Gutierrez v. House of Representatives Committee on Justice (G.R. No. 193459, February 15, 2011)

3. Agabon v. NLRC (G.R. No. 158693, November 17, 2004)

4. Tañada v. Angara (G.R. No. 118295, May 2, 1997)

5. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS (G.R. No. 122156, February 3, 1997)

vii. Progressive Interpretation

1. Orceo v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 190779, March 26, 2010)

b. Statutes

i. Definition

ii. Types of Statutes

iii. Enactment of Statutes

iv. Parts of a Statute

v. Single Subject Requirement

1. Lambino v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 174153, October 25, 2006)

2. Reman Enterprises, Inc. v. Professional Regulatory Board of Real Estate Service (G.R. No. 197676, February 4, 2014)

vi. Procedure for Passing a Bill

vii. Presidential Veto

viii. Publication Requirements

1. Tañada v. Tuvera (136 SCRA 27)

2. Tañada v. Tuvera (146 SCRA 446)

ix. Validity

x. Effect and Operation

 c. Presidential Issuances, Rules and Ordinances

i. Presidential Issuances

ii. SC Circulars

1. Jadewell Parking Systems Corp. v. Hon. Lidua (G.R. No. 169588, October 7, 2013)

iii. Rules and Regulations

iv. Administrative Rule v. Interpretation

1. Victorias Milling Co. v. SSC (G.R. No. L-16704, March 17, 1962)

v. Construction of AOs and IRRs vis-à-vis Statutes

1. RMBSA v. HDMF (333 SCRA 777)

2. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481)

vi. Ordinances

vii. Construction of Ordinances vis-à-vis Statutes

1. Solicitor General v MMA (G.R. No. 102782, December 11, 1991)

2. Magtajas v. Pryce (G.R. No. 111097, July 20, 1994)

3. Primicias v. Urdaneta (93 SCRA 462)

4. Bagatsing v. Ramirez (74 SCRA 306)

IV. Aids to Construction

a. Application

b. Intrinsic Aids

i. “Whereas” Clause as Aid

1. People v. Echavez (95 SCRA 663)

2. Llamado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989)

ii. Headings

1. Kare v. Platon (G.R. No. L-35902, October 28, 1931)

iii. Arrangement and ordering

1. De Castro v. JBC (G. R. No. 191002) a. March 17, 2010 and April 20, 2010 decisions

b. J. Carpio-Morales dissenting opinion

c. Extrinsic Aids

i. Legislative History / Origin of Statute

1. United States v. Serapio (23 Phil. 584)

2. U.S. v. De Guzman (30 Phil. 416)

3. Schneckenburger v. Moran (G.R. No. L-44896, July 31, 1936) & Dissenting Opinion

ii. Realities existing at the time of adoption

1. Gamboa v. Finance Sec. (G.R. No. 176579)

2. Aquino v. COMELEC (62 SCRA 275)

3. Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary (194 SCRA 317)

4. Poe-Llamanzares v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 221697, March 8, 2016)

iii. Legislative Debates

1. Luz Farms v. Secretary of DAR (192 SCRA 51)

2. Montejo v. COMELEC (242 SCRA 415)

3. China Bank v. Ortega (49 SCRA 335)

iv. Changes in phraseology

1. Umali v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 203974, April 22, 2014)

2. La Bugal-B’laan Tribal Assocciation, Inc. v. Ramos (G.R. No. 127882, January 27, 2004)

3. Dreamwork Construction, Inc. v. Janiola (G.R. No. 184861, June 30, 2009)

v. Usage

1. Manila Jockey Club v. Games and Amusement Board (107 Phil 151)

vi. Contemporaneous Acts of Legislature

1. David v. COMELEC (271 SCRA 90)

vii. Executive Construction

1. Rule

2. When not favored

3. Rule v. Opinion

4. Asturias Sugar Central, Inc. v. Commissioner of Customs (29 SCRA 617)

5. Chartered Bank Employees’ Association v. Ople (138 SCRA 273)

6. Nestle Phil., Inc. v. CA (G.R. No. 86738, November 13, 1991)

7. ACORD v. Zamora (G.R. No. 144256, June 8, 2005)

8. De Los Santos v. Torres (G.R. No. L-3881, August 31, 1950)

V. Presumptions

a. In favor of the validity of legislative acts

b. Against extrajudicial application of statutes

c. Against ineffectiveness of statutes

i. What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly

1. CSC v Cortes (GR No 200103 April 23, 2014)

d. In favor of beneficial operation of statutes

e. Against retroactive operation of statutes

f. Against injustice

g. Against inconvenience

h. Against absurdity

i. Against uncertainty

j. In favor of constitutionality

k. In favor of consistency

l. As to public policy

m. Of acquiescence of judicial construction

n. As to foreign law

o. Against violation of international law

p. Against implied repeals

VI. Special v. General Provisions

a. Conflicting provisions of the same Statute

i. Laxamana v. Baltazar (G.R. No. L-5955, September 19, 1952)

b. Conflicting provisions of different statutes

 i. Philippine Railway Co. v. Collector of Int. Rev. (91 Phil. 35)

ii. Romualdez v. Marcelo (G.R. Nos. 165510-33, July 28, 2006)

iii. Butuan Sawmill v. City of Butuan (16 SCRA 227)

c. Conflict between special provisions of a general law and a general provision

i. Bagatsing v. Ramirez (74 SCRA 306)

ii. Teotico v. City of Manila (22 SCRA 267)

iii. David v. COMELEC (271 SCRA 90)

VII. Rules of Statutory Construction (Latin Maxims)

a. Verba legis non est recedendum

i. Panaguiton v. DOJ (G.R. No. 167571, November 25, 2008)

ii. Padua v. People (G.R. No. 168546, July 23, 2008)

iii. Jadewell Parking Systems Corp. v. Lidua (2013)

b. Index animi sermo est

c. Ratio legis est anima legis

i. LCP v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 176951, December 21, 2009)

d. Verba intentioni, non e, contra, debent inservire

i. PCFI v. NTC (G.R. No. L-63318, August 18, 1984) 1. Dissenting Opinion of J. Abad

e. Qui haeret in litera, haeret in cortice

i. People v. Simon (G.R. No. 93028 , July 29, 1994)

ii. People v. Puno (G.R. No. 97471, February 17, 1993)

f. Mens legislatoris

i. U.S. v. Toribio (15 Phil. 85)

ii. Macabenta v. Davao Stevedore Terminal Co. (32 SCRA 553)

g. Dura lex sed lex

i. People v. Callos (G.R. No. 133478, January 16, 2002)

ii. People v. Suriaga (G.R. No. 123779, April 17, 2002)

h. Expresio unius est exclusio alterius

i. Catu v. Rellosa (A.C. No. 5738, February 19, 2008)

ii. Lung Center of Phil v. Quezon City (G.R. No. 144104, June 29, 2004)

iii. People v. Mamac (G.R. No. 130332, May 31, 2000)

iv. Leviste v. CA (G.R. No. 189122, March 17, 2010)

i. Ejusdem Generis

i. Sulpicio Lines v. Curso (G.R. No. 157009, March 17, 2010)

ii. NPC v. Angas (G.R. Nos. 60225-26, May 8, 1992)

j. Casus omissus (permissive v. restrictive)

i. People v. Manantan (G.R. No. 14129, July 31, 1962)

ii. Republic v. Cojuangco (G.R. No. 139930, June 26, 2012) & Separate Opinions

k. Noscitur a sociis

i. Philippines v. Flores (G.R. No. 188315, August 25, 2010)

ii. People v. Bello (G.R. Nos. 166948-59, August 29, 2012)

l. Ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus

i. Yu v. Samson-Tatad (G.R. No. 170979, February 9, 2011)

ii. People v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 164185, July 23, 2008)

m. Ex praecedentibus et consequentibus fit optima interpretation

VIII. Adherence or Departure from Language of Statute

a. Literal Construction

i. Rule

ii. When not favored

b. Departure from Literal Construction

i. When proper

ii. Limitation of Rule

c. Cases

1. Abellana v. Marave (57 SCRA 106)

2. Comendador v. De Villa (200 SCRA 80)

3. Amatan v. Aujero (248 SCRA 511)

4. Ursua v. CA (256 SCRA 147)

5. Salvacion v. Central Bank (278 SCRA 27)

6. Sec. of Justice v. Kuroga (G.R. No. 166199, April 24, 2009)

7. CSC v. CA (G.R. No. 176162, October 9, 2012)

8. Republic of the Philippines v Orbecido III (G.R. No. 154380 October 5, 2005)

9. National Federation of Labor vs. NLRC (327 SCRA 158)

10. Co Kim Cham v. Valdez (75 Phil. 113)

11. Philippine Airlines v. CA (G.R. No. L-49188, January 30, 1990)

d. Doctrine of Necessary Implications

i. Chua v. CSC (G.R. No. 88979, February 7, 1992)

ii. NATU v. Torres (G.R. No. 93468, December 29, 1994)

IX. Strict or Liberal Construction of Specific Types of Statutes

a. Liberal Construction

b. Strict Construction

c. Preliminary Matters

d. Definitions

e. Social Justice

f. General Welfare

i. Strict Construction

1. Penal Statutes

a. General Rule

b. Rule on Retroactivity

c. Ex Post Facto Law

d. Conflict within the RPC

e. Cases

i. Llamado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989)

 ii. Centeno v. Villalon-Pornillos (G.R. No. 113092, September 1, 1994)

iii. Gosiaco v. Ching (G.R. No. 173807, April 16, 2009)

iv. Corpuz v. People (G.R. No. 180016, 29 April 2014) Majority and Separate Opinions

f. Void for vagueness

i. Sps. Romualdez v. COMELEC (G.R. NO. 167011, April 30, 2008) 1. Dissent of justice Tinga

2. Statutes in Derogation of Rights

3. Expropriation Laws

a. Republic v. Lim (G.R. No. 161656, June 29, 2005)

b. Republic of the Philippines v. Holy Trinity Development Corp. (G.R. No. 172410, April 14, 2008)

4. Statutes Granting Privileges

a. United Paracle Mining Co. v. Dela Rosa (G.R. No. 63786-87, April 7, 1993)

b. Boardwalk Business Venture v. Villareal (G.R. No. 181182, April 10, 2013)

c. People of the Philippines v. Jalosjos (G.R. No. 132875-76, February 3, 2000)

5. Legislative Grants to LGUs

a. Quimsing v. Lachica, et al. (G.R. No. L-14683, May 30, 1961)

b. Unson v. Lacson (G.R. No. L-7909, January 18, 1957)

c. Republic of the Philippines v. Provincial Governor (G.R. No. L-28055, October 30, 1967)

6. Removal of Officers

a. Lacson v. Roque (G.R. No. L-6225, January 10, 1953)

7. Naturalization Laws

a. In re Reyes (G.R. No. L-10761, November 29, 1958)

b. Co v. Civil Register (G.R. No. 138496, February 23, 2004)

8. Tax Laws

a. Rule and Exceptions

i. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Fortune Tobacco Corp. (G.R. Nos. 167274-75, July 21, 2008)

b. Tax Exemption Laws

i. Davao Oriental Electric Cooperative v. Province of Davao Oriental (G.R. No. 170901, January 20, 2009

c. Tax Sales

i. Serfino v. CTA (154 SCRA 19)

9. Statutes Imposing Custom Duties

10. Statutes Concerning the Republic

a. Statutes authorizing suits against the State

11. Wills

a. Statutes Prescribing Formalities

b. Interpretation of Wills

Interpretation of Wills

i. Tampoy v. Alberastine (107 SCRA 100)

ii. Chavez v. Dozen Construction and Development Corp. (G.R. No. 192916, October 11, 2010)

c. Rule on Substantial Compliance

12. Exemptions and.Provisos

ii. Liberal Construction

1. General Social Legislation

a. In re Application for Survivorship Benefits of Mrs. Gruba (A.M. No. 14155-Ret., November 19, 2013)

b. Obra v. SSS (G.R. No. 147745, April 9, 2003)

2. General Welfare Clause

a. U.S. v. Salaveria (G.R. No. L-13678, November 12, 1918)

b. Ramirez v. Villegas (G.R. No. L-24153, February 14, 1983)

c. PLDT v. City of Davao (G.R. No. L-23080, October 30, 1965)

3. Grant of Power to LGUs

a. Magtajas v. Pryce (G.R. No. 111097, July 20, 1994) i. J. Padilla dissenting opinion

4. Grant of Taxing Power

a. Government of Quezon City v. Bayan Telecommunications (G.R. No. 162015, March 6, 2006)

b. Medina v. City of Baguio (G.R. No. L-4060, August 29, 1952)

5. Statutes Prescribing Prescriptive Periods to Collect Tax

a. CIR v. BF Goodrich Phils, Inc (G.R. No. 104171, February 24, 1999)

b. CIR v. Phil. Global Communication, Inc. (G. R. No. 167146, October 31, 2006)

6. Statutes Imposing Penalties for Non-Payment of Tax

7. Debtor Protection Laws

8. Election Laws

a. Tolentino v. COMELEC (G.R. Nos. 187958, April 7, 2010)

b. Frivaldo v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 120295, June 28, 1996)

c. Luna v. Rodriguez (G.R. No. L-13744, November 29, 1918)

9. Amnesty Decrees

a. Aquino v. PAAC (G.R. No. L-3879, April 27, 1951)

10. Statutes Prescribing Prescription of Crimes

a. Romualdez v. Marcelo (G.R. Nos. 165510-33, July 28, 2006)

b. People v. Moran (G.R. No. L-17905, January 27, 1923)

11. Adoption Statutes

a. In re Adoption of Stephanie Garcia (G.R. No. 148311, March 31, 2005)

12. Veteran and Pension Laws

a. Board of Administrator v. Bautista (G.R. No. L-37867, February 22, 1982)

13. Rules of Court

a. Rules in General

i. City of Dumaguete v

b. Applicability to Administrative Bodies

c. Rule Regarding Period and Modes of Appeal

i. Thenamaris Phil., Inc. v. CA (G.R. No. 191215, February 3, 2014)

ii. Boardwalk Business Venture v. Villareal

d. Rule on Summary Procedure

i. Gachon v. Devera (G.R. No. 11

14. Labor Laws

 a. Rules of Construction as provided in Labor Code

i. Cristobal v. ECC (G.R. No. L-49280, February 26, 1981)

ii. Dissenting opinion of J. Velasco in Perez v. Phil. Telegraph & Telephone Co. (G.R. No. 152048, April 7, 2009) and

iii. J Velasco Dissent in Gatus v. Quality House, Inc. (G.R. No. 156766, April 16, 2009)

b. Rule and exceptions regarding retirement

i. In re Request of Judge Gustilo (A.M. No. RTJ-04-1868, August 13, 2004)

15. Insurance

a. Laws

b. Contractual Provisions

i. Fortune Medicare, Inc. v. Amorin (G.R. No. 195872, March 12, 2014)

16. Corporate Law

a. Home Insurance Co. v. Eastern Shipping Lines (G.R. No. L-34382, July 20, 1983)

17. Agrarian Reform

a. David v. CA (G.R. No. L-57719-21, May 6, 1988)

b. Department of Justice Opinion No. 44, Series of 1990

X. Mandatory or Directory

a. Mandatory v Directory provisions

i. Bermudez v. Executive Secretary (G.R. No. 131429, August 4, 1999)

ii. Marcelino v. Cruz (G.R. No. L-42428, March 18, 1983)

iii. Malcora v. CA (G.R. No. L-51042, September 30, 1982)

b. Can a provision be both mandatory and directory?

i. MMDA v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay (G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008)

XI. Prospective or Retroactive Application

a. Gamboa v. Teves (G.R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012)

XII. Construction of Specific Words and Phrases

a. Ordinary Meaning

b. “May” and “Shall”

i. Director of Lands v. CA (276 SCRA 276)

ii. Capati v. Ocampo (113 SCRA 799)

iii. Basiana v. Luna (103 SCRA 49

c. “Or” and “And”
i. GMRC v. Bell Telecom (271 SCRA 790)

d. Principally and Exclusively

i. Alfon v. Republic (97 SCRA 859)

e. Exclusively

i. CIR v. CA (G.R. No. 124043, October 14, 1998)

ii. Lung Center of Phil v. Quezon City (G.R. No. 144104, June 29, 2004)

f. Previously

i. Rural v. Lopena (137 SCRA 121)

ii. Francisco v. CA (G.R. No. 108747, April 6, 1995)

g. Every

i. IBAAEU v. Inciong (132 SCRA 663)

ii. NHA v. Juco (134 SCRA 172)

h. “Term” and “Tenure”

i. Fetalino v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 191890, December 04, 2012)

i. Surplasages

i. People v. Duque (212 SCRA 607)

j. Punctuations

i. Arabay v. CFI (66 SCRA 617)

ii. Florentino v. PNB (98 Phil 959)

k. Past Tense

i. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481)

ii. Regalado v. Yulo (G.R. No. L-42935, February 15, 1935)

l. Provisos, Exceptions and Saving Clauses

i. Rules and exceptions to the rules

1. Borromeo v. Mariano (G.R. No. L-16808, January 3, 1921)

2. Santos v. CCS (G.R. No. 158071, April 2, 2009)

3. Llmado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989)

ii. Conflict between main provision and proviso

iii. Exceptions

1. Lokin v. COMELEC (G.R. Nos. 179431-32, June 22, 2010)

2. Tagabi v. Tanque (G.R. No. 144024, July 27, 2006)

iv. Saving Clauses

XIII. Amendment, Revision, Codification and Repeals

a. Definitions

b. Repeals v. Amendments

i. Gloria v. CA (306 SCRA 287)

c. Retroactivity

i. Tac-an v. CA (137 SCRA 803)

d. Express v. Implied

i. Requisites Villegas v. Subido (GR No. 31711)

ii. Gimenez `v. SEC (133 SCRA 840)

iii. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481)

e. Later over Earlier

f. In Pare Materia

i. Flores v. San Pedro (102 Phil 44)

ii. Vda. de. Urbano v. GSIS (GR No. 137904)

 Case Title Person Assigned Google Drive Link
1 1. Caltex vs Palomar Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
2 1. Airsporna v. CA Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
3 2. China Bank v. Ortega Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
4 3. PVA Board v. Bautista Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
5 1. PCFI v. NTC Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
6 1. NFL v. Eisma Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
7 2. Paat v. CA Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
8 3. People v. Mapa Galope https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pqxsthHvRjn0ldCEpffMUfRyhrFKMIDe
9 4. Leveriza v. IAC Clarabal https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ElTlA5JLPCWXLKjf9EUcx06ScQHEHKpZ
10 5. Daoang v. Municipal Judge Clarabal https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ElTlA5JLPCWXLKjf9EUcx06ScQHEHKpZ
11 6. Paras v. COMELEC Delfin https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CC3fb7K18QBJQZzXZ-0_jH2lkb1ruzeW
12 1. Perfecto v. Meer Delfin https://drive.google.com/open?id=12PxnzKyUeSfAIzi2UgvNZOISgh2cthIz
13 2. Endencia v. David Roche https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WAju7deAkubRkboEs5VL6dHJEFTTs07j
14 3. Nitafan v. CIR Roche https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FpOhhtFYGCND4w_8zeFmvb3GWW7LyB9W
15 1. Floresca v. Philex Mining Roche https://drive.google.com/open?id=173PhYdAI9fRgW0gwOW9pkgQ9qm0YA0bX
16 a. Sarmiento v. Mison (156 SCRA 549) Espinosa https://drive.google.com/open?id=1skLeDSNihx9XnQ9UED4uh-wuBGp0Gjwu
17 b. Francisco v. House of Representatives Espinosa https://drive.google.com/open?id=1skLeDSNihx9XnQ9UED4uh-wuBGp0Gjwu
18 c. Chavez v. JBC Espinosa https://drive.google.com/open?id=1skLeDSNihx9XnQ9UED4uh-wuBGp0Gjwu
19 d. Chavez v. JBC Espinosa https://drive.google.com/open?id=1skLeDSNihx9XnQ9UED4uh-wuBGp0Gjwu
20 e. Macalintal v. PET Saus https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LdvUPzWs6V7BPV7t2sIeKeYb-57_llhcliKopr_e4Gw
21 1. Aglipay v. Ruiz (64 Phil. 201) Saus https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LdvUPzWs6V7BPV7t2sIeKeYb-57_llhcliKopr_e4Gw
22 2. Estrada v. Escritor (A.M. No. P-02-1651) Saus https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LdvUPzWs6V7BPV7t2sIeKeYb-57_llhcliKopr_e4Gw
23 3. Imbong v. Ochoa (G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014) Corotan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GY63JIEjY7BdIeSiCBZtJlOA5f-4LrgS
24 4. Gamboa v. Finance Sec. (G.R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012) Diocera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CV6HV8JTyqPL8q9nUOSTiYry2QbCc14x
25 5. Narra Nickel Mining and Development Corp. v. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp. (G.R. No. 195580, April 21, 2014) Suelto https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vGSfflM3QcZQozaTGx2Ms1gQa975DZm-
26 1. Tawang Multipurpose Cooperative v. La Trinidad Water District (G.R. No. 166471, March 22, 2011) Zorilla https://drive.google.com/open?id=1U4yEYgdCSoWRxOipsONUK7LGBsGcw6iH
27 2. Umali v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 203974, April 22, 2014) Ostan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aS13xCx3v78mcZ78Gzn9wszDem_pEDde
28 3. Paras v. COMELEC (264 SCRA 49) Raz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xRcazqAxzxNHh6vDDhU3IRbJyB5s6pMD
29 4. Ordillo v. COMELEC (192 SCRA 100 Batacan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m826R_6KfUODzfF8A_nr-TzyfD9uRNJr
30 1. Central Bank Employees Association v. Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (G.R. No. 148208, December 15, 2004) Corpuz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YPnVe6kZhQhMtFxYScSu9baoLa5m3q6l
31 1. Gamboa v. Finance Secretary (G.R. No. 176579, June 28, 2011) Amodia https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Xq8jeKL-LyL72-X6vOTK2aabnXBBsNCk
32 2. Gutierrez v. House of Representatives Committee on Justice (G.R. No. 193459, February 15, 2011) Cullo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uO_m0kbxbIqwaw7XlEBUJvxzKslMYVzn
33 3. Agabon v. NLRC (G.R. No. 158693, November 17, 2004) Rizalda

34 4. Tañada v. Angara (G.R. No. 118295, May 2, 1997) Jimenea https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E8wFHLtxl_bwtPyze-aYZPg1fsi6dHKS

35 5. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS (G.R. No. 122156, February 3, 1997) Gonzaga https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bc646O1ljfoi7sypVFxyJ3bJ32gLNuCR
36 1. Orceo v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 190779, March 26, 2010) Cameros https://drive.google.com/open?id=13D8JbTC1SX8Xos_ym51fwK9yNvNab8qX
37 1. Lambino v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 174153, October 25, 2006) Saus https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QnNO6ZK9h5eEeQdIjzcoOXPFLzXBXB-xtee5HNsRMJo
38 2. Reman Enterprises, Inc. v. Professional Regulatory Board of Real Estate Service (G.R. No. 197676, February 4, 2014) Crespo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lo9ojvtggk9UbUIB80uNqX3LXn9FTIEB
39 1. Tañada v. Tuvera (136 SCRA 27) Aranjuez https://drive.google.com/open?id=16iY3E5cLDVsI8ioa0RMid_auhzN0wwTR
40 2. Tañada v. Tuvera (146 SCRA 446) Ko https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XWCMMrlY8p-E8CRxjJD5dAySy7Yk-3Mn
41 1. Jadewell Parking Systems Corp. v. Hon. Lidua (G.R. No. 169588, October 7, 2013) Galas https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XVEZnKEo8UIgqeTk7gRzBQVHcsX5wbCX
42 1. Victorias Milling Co. v. SSC (G.R. No. L-16704, March 17, 1962) Alcoran https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MMgTmYe7Tp0VQJGg7srcvEE-iauygei6
43 1. RMBSA v. HDMF (333 SCRA 777) Gulanes https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dmrkG3IXirNr0GjsmGcz-c3ZA3mOeSS6
44 2. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481) Layog https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KSPfGDVA-NB1WJNzMUdrO5oTVTwFspcT
45 1. Solicitor General v MMA (G.R. No. 102782, December 11, 1991) Paracale https://drive.google.com/open?id=1L075Ck1DUf100TIAmI__75rHhEo7X8pD
46 2. Magtajas v. Pryce (G.R. No. 111097, July 20, 1994) Abella https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SEwviqyd48JSgtfc7fdGu-qXCRYrBEj3F7D5GnIkIso
47 3. Primicias v. Urdaneta (93 SCRA 462) Ebuen

48 4. Bagatsing v. Ramirez (74 SCRA 306) Mabang https://drive.google.com/open?id=1keTT9QAL_xKHnHSOo87RIggWcURxIlYQ

49 1. People v. Echavez (95 SCRA 663) Mangui-ob

50 2. Llamado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989) Ballos https://drive.google.com/open?id=14_52rVtRKfBUY_oi05Ff0XiXZYRrRZj1

51 1. Kare v. Platon (G.R. No. L-35902, October 28, 1931) Somcio https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Lg2zJdJKmqGlTEhvJaFTmQD8kKq0EcN
52 1. De Castro v. JBC (G. R. No. 191002) Dacera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RLWjAUBxLuW0PJoT-rNG7jMWVqylEiBb
53 1. United States v. Serapio (23 Phil. 584) Mamalo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ok-ionubYg3aC3TzvZ3ZXrL2R92pCEvF
54 2. U.S. v. De Guzman (30 Phil. 416) Velez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UZuVoKUyP29iCxY4N5uSWMADGJPUH6F3
55 3. Schneckenburger v. Moran (G.R. No. L-44896, July 31, 1936) & Dissenting Opinion Payot https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fHrF3myRmEdnIKGGxeOueiyFWn_nygUQiVyet4xGT5E
56 1. Gamboa v. Finance Sec. (G.R. No. 176579) Hermano https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tmG4LY6yRv2AwoY834hBy9jYU6m4wppN
57 2. Aquino v. COMELEC (62 SCRA 275) Roche https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SrKy5XzruEdmf6pf2-2ZUacZIZtzP0eZ
58 3. Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary (194 SCRA 317) Espinosa https://drive.google.com/open?id=1skLeDSNihx9XnQ9UED4uh-wuBGp0Gjwu
59 4. Poe-Llamanzares v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 221697, March 8, 2016) Saus https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LdvUPzWs6V7BPV7t2sIeKeYb-57_llhcliKopr_e4Gw
60 1. Luz Farms v. Secretary of DAR (192 SCRA 51) Castillo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iglbxT-1vWQSPIXkNpNTR7zQJJ_TbqH-
61 2. Montejo v. COMELEC (242 SCRA 415) Seruela https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B1GOC-LixJzvzvwPrD9eG8TUWlqKJ0kl
62 3. China Bank v. Ortega (49 SCRA 335) Delfin https://drive.google.com/open?id=15qZOQ4BErnmbdwAIShiwnzqBdZ_pBCcd
63 1. Umali v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 203974, April 22, 2014) Clarabal https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ElTlA5JLPCWXLKjf9EUcx06ScQHEHKpZ
64 2. La Bugal-B’laan Tribal Assocciation, Inc. v. Ramos (G.R. No. 127882, January 27, 2004) Corotan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1P1D4IyoqnH751USxpBD9c3KosptynUpC
65 3. Dreamwork Construction, Inc. v. Janiola (G.R. No. 184861, June 30, 2009) Corotan https://drive.google.com/open?id=13vnH7TJBoAubwIRQTRBSYXLnHGHfP1Fu
66 1. Manila Jockey Club v. Games and Amusement Board (107 Phil 151) Corotan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yRWXWI7UU5i6GQfJTTBxP19Ty6RSBv1k
67 1. David v. COMELEC (271 SCRA 90) Corotan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TsFpkILA6XcfIRikmtUnscEfFIC3MWva
68 4. Asturias Sugar Central, Inc. v. Commissioner of Customs (29 SCRA 617) Diocera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NVXWarSWVRAiZ4HagPuUcPbD8fiZ45gy
69 5. Chartered Bank Employees’ Association v. Ople (138 SCRA 273) Diocera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qSF3yXW1bN_sKw35WlbIoxcRdP-3Nn4U
70 6. Nestle Phil., Inc. v. CA (G.R. No. 86738, November 13, 1991) Diocera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E_n15CTPYeG-TxOKb7YlaJRy6Jqg6_uI
71 7. ACORD v. Zamora (G.R. No. 144256, June 8, 2005) Diocera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1L8U5trifHoT41ymXNXBWgZ5NXGqd1zfE
72 8. De Los Santos v. Torres (G.R. No. L-3881, August 31, 1950) Suelto https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vGSfflM3QcZQozaTGx2Ms1gQa975DZm-
73 1. CSC v Cortes (GR No 200103 April 23, 2014) Suelto https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vGSfflM3QcZQozaTGx2Ms1gQa975DZm-
74 i. Laxamana v. Baltazar (G.R. No. L-5955, September 19, 1952) Suelto https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vGSfflM3QcZQozaTGx2Ms1gQa975DZm-
75 i. Philippine Railway Co. v. Collector of Int. Rev. (91 Phil. 35) Suelto https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vGSfflM3QcZQozaTGx2Ms1gQa975DZm-
76 ii. Romualdez v. Marcelo (G.R. Nos. 165510-33, July 28, 2006) Zorilla https://drive.google.com/open?id=1U4yEYgdCSoWRxOipsONUK7LGBsGcw6iH
77 iii. Butuan Sawmill v. City of Butuan (16 SCRA 227) Zorilla https://drive.google.com/open?id=1U4yEYgdCSoWRxOipsONUK7LGBsGcw6iH
78 i. Bagatsing v. Ramirez (74 SCRA 306) Zorilla https://drive.google.com/open?id=1U4yEYgdCSoWRxOipsONUK7LGBsGcw6iH
79 ii. Teotico v. City of Manila (22 SCRA 267) Zorilla https://drive.google.com/open?id=1U4yEYgdCSoWRxOipsONUK7LGBsGcw6iH
80 iii. David v. COMELEC (271 SCRA 90) Ostan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bxIkO20R1NbDr6wOQVZW0WNKy0tTz-2b
81 i. Panaguiton v. DOJ (G.R. No. 167571, November 25, 2008) Ostan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m_402kVHc5vaI2scWTVOS9wAHJlgJZS6
82 ii. Padua v. People (G.R. No. 168546, July 23, 2008) Ostan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1f9OlvjRVjciiQlEPZP96lTbsNng67uB-
83 iii. Jadewell Parking Systems Corp. v. Lidua (2013) Ostan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B1Yn29YGVDDWsAB0BNIvG-tE51kYdKjX
84 i. LCP v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 176951, December 21, 2009) Raz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xRcazqAxzxNHh6vDDhU3IRbJyB5s6pMD
 Case Title Person Assigned Google Drive Link
85 i. PCFI v. NTC (G.R. No. L-63318, August 18, 1984) Raz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xRcazqAxzxNHh6vDDhU3IRbJyB5s6pMD
86 i. People v. Simon (G.R. No. 93028 , July 29, 1994) Raz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xRcazqAxzxNHh6vDDhU3IRbJyB5s6pMD
87 ii. People v. Puno (G.R. No. 97471, February 17, 1993) Raz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xRcazqAxzxNHh6vDDhU3IRbJyB5s6pMD
88 i. U.S. v. Toribio (15 Phil. 85) Batacan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m826R_6KfUODzfF8A_nr-TzyfD9uRNJr
89 ii. Macabenta v. Davao Stevedore Terminal Co. (32 SCRA 553) Batacan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m826R_6KfUODzfF8A_nr-TzyfD9uRNJr
90 i. People v. Callos (G.R. No. 133478, January 16, 2002) Batacan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m826R_6KfUODzfF8A_nr-TzyfD9uRNJr
91 ii. People v. Suriaga (G.R. No. 123779, April 17, 2002) Batacan https://drive.google.com/open?id=1m826R_6KfUODzfF8A_nr-TzyfD9uRNJr
92 i. Catu v. Rellosa (A.C. No. 5738, February 19, 2008) Corpuz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YPnVe6kZhQhMtFxYScSu9baoLa5m3q6l
93 ii. Lung Center of Phil v. Quezon City (G.R. No. 144104, June 29, 2004) Corpuz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YPnVe6kZhQhMtFxYScSu9baoLa5m3q6l
94 iii. People v. Mamac (G.R. No. 130332, May 31, 2000) Corpuz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YPnVe6kZhQhMtFxYScSu9baoLa5m3q6l
95 iv. Leviste v. CA (G.R. No. 189122, March 17, 2010) Corpuz https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YPnVe6kZhQhMtFxYScSu9baoLa5m3q6l
96 i. Sulpicio Lines v. Curso (G.R. No. 157009, March 17, 2010) Amodia https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Xq8jeKL-LyL72-X6vOTK2aabnXBBsNCk
97 ii. NPC v. Angas (G.R. Nos. 60225-26, May 8, 1992) Amodia https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Xq8jeKL-LyL72-X6vOTK2aabnXBBsNCk
98 i. People v. Manantan (G.R. No. 14129, July 31, 1962) Amodia https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Xq8jeKL-LyL72-X6vOTK2aabnXBBsNCk
99 ii. Republic v. Cojuangco (G.R. No. 139930, June 26, 2012) & Separate Opinions Seruela https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LdonRHnn5zMtxMXSetexhSrOIHnEnAE_
100 i. Philippines v. Flores (G.R. No. 188315, August 25, 2010) Cullo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uO_m0kbxbIqwaw7XlEBUJvxzKslMYVzn
101 ii. People v. Bello (G.R. Nos. 166948-59, August 29, 2012) Cullo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uO_m0kbxbIqwaw7XlEBUJvxzKslMYVzn
102 i. Yu v. Samson-Tatad (G.R. No. 170979, February 9, 2011) Cullo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uO_m0kbxbIqwaw7XlEBUJvxzKslMYVzn
103 ii. People v. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 164185, July 23, 2008) Cullo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uO_m0kbxbIqwaw7XlEBUJvxzKslMYVzn
104 1. Abellana v. Marave (57 SCRA 106) Rizalda

105 2. Comendador v. De Villa (200 SCRA 80) Rizalda

106 3. Amatan v. Aujero (248 SCRA 511) Rizalda

107 4. Ursua v. CA (256 SCRA 147) Rizalda

108 5. Salvacion v. Central Bank (278 SCRA 27) Jimenea https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E8wFHLtxl_bwtPyze-aYZPg1fsi6dHKS

109 6. Sec. of Justice v. Kuroga (G.R. No. 166199, April 24, 2009) Jimenea https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E8wFHLtxl_bwtPyze-aYZPg1fsi6dHKS
110 7. CSC v. CA (G.R. No. 176162, October 9, 2012) Jimenea https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E8wFHLtxl_bwtPyze-aYZPg1fsi6dHKS
111 8. Republic of the Philippines v Orbecido III (G.R. No. 154380 October 5, 2005) Jimenea https://drive.google.com/open?id=1E8wFHLtxl_bwtPyze-aYZPg1fsi6dHKS
112 9. National Federation of Labor vs. NLRC (327 SCRA 158) Gonzaga https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bc646O1ljfoi7sypVFxyJ3bJ32gLNuCR
113 10. Co Kim Cham v. Valdez (75 Phil. 113) Gonzaga https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bc646O1ljfoi7sypVFxyJ3bJ32gLNuCR
114 11. Philippine Airlines v. CA (G.R. No. L-49188, January 30, 1990) Gonzaga https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bc646O1ljfoi7sypVFxyJ3bJ32gLNuCR
115 i. Chua v. CSC (G.R. No. 88979, February 7, 1992) Gonzaga https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bc646O1ljfoi7sypVFxyJ3bJ32gLNuCR
116 ii. NATU v. Torres (G.R. No. 93468, December 29, 1994) Cameros https://drive.google.com/open?id=13D8JbTC1SX8Xos_ym51fwK9yNvNab8qX
117 i. Llamado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989) Cameros https://drive.google.com/open?id=13D8JbTC1SX8Xos_ym51fwK9yNvNab8qX
118 ii. Centeno v. Villalon-Pornillos (G.R. No. 113092, September 1, 1994) Cameros https://drive.google.com/open?id=13D8JbTC1SX8Xos_ym51fwK9yNvNab8qX
119 iii. Gosiaco v. Ching (G.R. No. 173807, April 16, 2009) Cameros https://drive.google.com/open?id=13D8JbTC1SX8Xos_ym51fwK9yNvNab8qX
120 iv. Corpuz v. People (G.R. No. 180016, 29 April 2014) Majority and Separate Opinions Seruela https://drive.google.com/open?id=1orY-XE_oY31AaoZNs8v_X64rSRpmIuwi
121 i. Sps. Romualdez v. COMELEC (G.R. NO. 167011, April 30, 2008) Seruela https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BTM8ZeL0Vs9EuuC7lLj-8hoqIVZFSvZt
122 a. Republic v. Lim (G.R. No. 161656, June 29, 2005) Seruela https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cYSioVXo8g_LM2Z-b3BmjAU_pn43HxdJ
123 b. Republic of the Philippines v. Holy Trinity Development Corp. (G.R. No. 172410, April 14, 2008) Seruela

124 a. United Paracle Mining Co. v. Dela Rosa (G.R. No. 63786-87, April 7, 1993) Crespo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lo9ojvtggk9UbUIB80uNqX3LXn9FTIEB
125 b. Boardwalk Business Venture v. Villareal (G.R. No. 181182, April 10, 2013) Crespo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lo9ojvtggk9UbUIB80uNqX3LXn9FTIEB
126 c. People of the Philippines v. Jalosjos (G.R. No. 132875-76, February 3, 2000) Crespo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lo9ojvtggk9UbUIB80uNqX3LXn9FTIEB
127 a. Quimsing v. Lachica, et al. (G.R. No. L-14683, May 30, 1961) Crespo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lo9ojvtggk9UbUIB80uNqX3LXn9FTIEB
128 b. Unson v. Lacson (G.R. No. L-7909, January 18, 1957) Aranjuez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pidVe_oWDCOKNxMYrh1gz0r_RYSG_0rt
129 c. Republic of the Philippines v. Provincial Governor (G.R. No. L-28055, October 30, 1967) Aranjuez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pidVe_oWDCOKNxMYrh1gz0r_RYSG_0rt
130 a. Lacson v. Roque (G.R. No. L-6225, January 10, 1953) Aranjuez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pidVe_oWDCOKNxMYrh1gz0r_RYSG_0rt
131 a. In re Reyes (G.R. No. L-10761, November 29, 1958) Aranjuez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pidVe_oWDCOKNxMYrh1gz0r_RYSG_0rt
132 b. Co v. Civil Register (G.R. No. 138496, February 23, 2004) Ko https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XWCMMrlY8p-E8CRxjJD5dAySy7Yk-3Mn
133 i. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Fortune Tobacco Corp. (G.R. Nos. 167274-75, July 21, 2008) Ko https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XWCMMrlY8p-E8CRxjJD5dAySy7Yk-3Mn
134 i. Davao Oriental Electric Cooperative v. Province of Davao Oriental (G.R. No. 170901, January 20, 2009 Ko https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XWCMMrlY8p-E8CRxjJD5dAySy7Yk-3Mn
135 i. Serfino v. CTA (154 SCRA 19) Ko https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XWCMMrlY8p-E8CRxjJD5dAySy7Yk-3Mn
136 i. Tampoy v. Alberastine (107 SCRA 100) Galas https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XVEZnKEo8UIgqeTk7gRzBQVHcsX5wbCX
137 ii. Chavez v. Dozen Construction and Development Corp. (G.R. No. 192916, October 11, 2010) Galas https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XVEZnKEo8UIgqeTk7gRzBQVHcsX5wbCX
138 a. In re Application for Survivorship Benefits of Mrs. Gruba (A.M. No. 14155-Ret., November 19, 2013) Galas https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XVEZnKEo8UIgqeTk7gRzBQVHcsX5wbCX
139 b. Obra v. SSS (G.R. No. 147745, April 9, 2003) Galas https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XVEZnKEo8UIgqeTk7gRzBQVHcsX5wbCX
140 a. U.S. v. Salaveria (G.R. No. L-13678, November 12, 1918) Alcoran https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h_sW0v1R9BXi5u30WUFsi4GcBFVPI5w8
141 b. Ramirez v. Villegas (G.R. No. L-24153, February 14, 1983) Alcoran https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BSJtJK29KR5i6UC899v4xlAXvVtCFpLj
142 c. PLDT v. City of Davao (G.R. No. L-23080, October 30, 1965) Alcoran https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wrTbvZiYPodgK72pFIg6S4HlVWVbeKHb
143 a. Magtajas v. Pryce (G.R. No. 111097, July 20, 1994) Alcoran https://drive.google.com/open?id=1H1LZBl5609-kU25CA2l3nGYwJHpFGOhB
144 a. Government of Quezon City v. Bayan Telecommunications (G.R. No. 162015, March 6, 2006) Gulanes https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dmrkG3IXirNr0GjsmGcz-c3ZA3mOeSS6
145 b. Medina v. City of Baguio (G.R. No. L-4060, August 29, 1952) Gulanes https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dmrkG3IXirNr0GjsmGcz-c3ZA3mOeSS6
146 a. CIR v. BF Goodrich Phils, Inc (G.R. No. 104171, February 24, 1999) Gulanes https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dmrkG3IXirNr0GjsmGcz-c3ZA3mOeSS6
147 b. CIR v. Phil. Global Communication, Inc. (G. R. No. 167146, October 31, 2006) Gulanes https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dmrkG3IXirNr0GjsmGcz-c3ZA3mOeSS6
148 a. Tolentino v. COMELEC (G.R. Nos. 187958, April 7, 2010) Layog https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yLzIYwf1VKssrYlkXgZz25T9iOHi9iTu
149 b. Frivaldo v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 120295, June 28, 1996) Layog https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ifKiG4XU4rzF_tURhCU3sIu6eOPO03TO
150 c. Luna v. Rodriguez (G.R. No. L-13744, November 29, 1918) Layog https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PbLLRNJKp3UhYXSMRbkCH4fzJDTpHrLO
151 a. Aquino v. PAAC (G.R. No. L-3879, April 27, 1951) Layog https://drive.google.com/open?id=16_j08-XONlkMTzR7FhdO3Qm25HYbUYee
152 a. Romualdez v. Marcelo (G.R. Nos. 165510-33, July 28, 2006) Paracale https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yXYC0H9uw9BAa-y9ivwoct1xlkMfraie
153 b. People v. Moran (G.R. No. L-17905, January 27, 1923) Paracale https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QFIKqQJpPUkw38lJBWKMkeW9W5E4McKU
154 a. In re Adoption of Stephanie Garcia (G.R. No. 148311, March 31, 2005) Paracale https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eS4C_C3OkE3dwjtWg2cJjCgmb94ivwPV
155 a. Board of Administrator v. Bautista (G.R. No. L-37867, February 22, 1982) Paracale https://drive.google.com/open?id=1i_YNfX6Iq8A7cwL5SoMJorVoxh-Hp9iy
156 i. City of Dumaguete v Abella https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SEwviqyd48JSgtfc7fdGu-qXCRYrBEj3F7D5GnIkIso
157 i. Thenamaris Phil., Inc. v. CA (G.R. No. 191215, February 3, 2014) Abella https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SEwviqyd48JSgtfc7fdGu-qXCRYrBEj3F7D5GnIkIso
158 ii. Boardwalk Business Venture v. Villareal Abella https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SEwviqyd48JSgtfc7fdGu-qXCRYrBEj3F7D5GnIkIso
159 i. Gachon v. Devera (G.R. No. 11 Abella https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SEwviqyd48JSgtfc7fdGu-qXCRYrBEj3F7D5GnIkIso
160 i. Cristobal v. ECC (G.R. No. L-49280, February 26, 1981) Ebuen https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CfARWWtGx1o7E5_td9zTV8PwdxpRd2Q88wODUzMkhN4
161 ii. Dissenting opinion of J. Velasco in Perez v. Phil. Telegraph & Telephone Co. (G.R. No. 152048, April 7, 2009) and Ebuen https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UNLZRmJw50Mjnuub-s5hWEqAqi0PiKWHDaOUxK2fdh4
162 iii. J Velasco Dissent in Gatus v. Quality House, Inc. (G.R. No. 156766, April 16, 2009) Ebuen https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UuipPEtbVbjlr2bNNSDa2kaQkCOqwcj7SXltQO8DWoM
163 i. Fortune Medicare, Inc. v. Amorin (G.R. No. 195872, March 12, 2014) Ebuen https://drive.google.com/open?id=12v7AZR3kH5jTK_1C113b39MFt9kk2aWaEjp6RG50v3Q
164 a. Home Insurance Co. v. Eastern Shipping Lines (G.R. No. L-34382, July 20, 1983) Mabang https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Hh75_b_QddYbDLdfOsd6H5HPR6vT9hjz
165 a. David v. CA (G.R. No. L-57719-21, May 6, 1988) Mabang https://drive.google.com/open?id=19smxnGSJbvDhFAlalCZxXA9SQNsahcpk
166 b. Department of Justice Opinion No. 44, Series of 1990 Mabang https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HKL0w0kE1Uke8QmVf976Hu5GcbTEJQm_
167 i. Bermudez v. Executive Secretary (G.R. No. 131429, August 4, 1999) Mabang https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GuEg601t2siC2ebucWRpit0t1aKfoRmf
168 ii. Marcelino v. Cruz (G.R. No. L-42428, March 18, 1983) Mangui-ob
 Case Title Person Assigned Google Drive Link
169 iii. Malcora v. CA (G.R. No. L-51042, September 30, 1982) Mangui-ob

170 i. MMDA v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay (G.R. Nos. 171947-48, December 18, 2008) Mangui-ob

171 a. Gamboa v. Teves (G.R. No. 176579, October 9, 2012) Mangui-ob

172 i. Director of Lands v. CA (276 SCRA 276) Ballos https://drive.google.com/open?id=14_52rVtRKfBUY_oi05Ff0XiXZYRrRZj1

173 ii. Capati v. Ocampo (113 SCRA 799) Ballos https://drive.google.com/open?id=14_52rVtRKfBUY_oi05Ff0XiXZYRrRZj1
174 iii. Basiana v. Luna (103 SCRA 49 Ballos https://drive.google.com/open?id=14_52rVtRKfBUY_oi05Ff0XiXZYRrRZj1
175 i. GMRC v. Bell Telecom (271 SCRA 790) Ballos https://drive.google.com/open?id=14_52rVtRKfBUY_oi05Ff0XiXZYRrRZj1
176 i. Alfon v. Republic (97 SCRA 859) Somcio https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Lg2zJdJKmqGlTEhvJaFTmQD8kKq0EcN
177 i. CIR v. CA (G.R. No. 124043, October 14, 1998) Somcio https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Lg2zJdJKmqGlTEhvJaFTmQD8kKq0EcN
178 ii. Lung Center of Phil v. Quezon City (G.R. No. 144104, June 29, 2004) Somcio https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Lg2zJdJKmqGlTEhvJaFTmQD8kKq0EcN
179 i. Rural v. Lopena (137 SCRA 121) Somcio https://drive.google.com/open?id=19Lg2zJdJKmqGlTEhvJaFTmQD8kKq0EcN
180 ii. Francisco v. CA (G.R. No. 108747, April 6, 1995) Dacera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1L2DEGw_djY7I8jvIv25jlYOq6hbw-Os5
181 i. IBAAEU v. Inciong (132 SCRA 663) Dacera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eKgjWhcLlv9VUMK-OXqyT2_rnXTXBDCP
182 ii. NHA v. Juco (134 SCRA 172) Dacera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yQB6Hi2vQb8VIzndDxmlMv_WZTmh6p2N
183 i. Fetalino v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 191890, December 04, 2012) Dacera https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-iO899qaGnAbXsNiB-JMFhfQ-nzTms0O
184 i. People v. Duque (212 SCRA 607) Mamalo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ok-ionubYg3aC3TzvZ3ZXrL2R92pCEvF
185 i. Arabay v. CFI (66 SCRA 617) Mamalo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ok-ionubYg3aC3TzvZ3ZXrL2R92pCEvF
186 ii. Florentino v. PNB (98 Phil 959) Mamalo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ok-ionubYg3aC3TzvZ3ZXrL2R92pCEvF
187 i. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481) Mamalo https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ok-ionubYg3aC3TzvZ3ZXrL2R92pCEvF
188 ii. Regalado v. Yulo (G.R. No. L-42935, February 15, 1935) Velez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UZuVoKUyP29iCxY4N5uSWMADGJPUH6F3
189 1. Borromeo v. Mariano (G.R. No. L-16808, January 3, 1921) Velez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UZuVoKUyP29iCxY4N5uSWMADGJPUH6F3
190 2. Santos v. CCS (G.R. No. 158071, April 2, 2009) Velez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UZuVoKUyP29iCxY4N5uSWMADGJPUH6F3
191 3. Llmado v. CA (G.R. No. 84850, June 29, 1989) Velez https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UZuVoKUyP29iCxY4N5uSWMADGJPUH6F3
192 1. Lokin v. COMELEC (G.R. Nos. 179431-32, June 22, 2010) Payot https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fHrF3myRmEdnIKGGxeOueiyFWn_nygUQiVyet4xGT5E
193 2. Tagabi v. Tanque (G.R. No. 144024, July 27, 2006) Payot https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fHrF3myRmEdnIKGGxeOueiyFWn_nygUQiVyet4xGT5E
194 i. Gloria v. CA (306 SCRA 287) Payot https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fHrF3myRmEdnIKGGxeOueiyFWn_nygUQiVyet4xGT5E
195 i. Tac-an v. CA (137 SCRA 803) Payot https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fHrF3myRmEdnIKGGxeOueiyFWn_nygUQiVyet4xGT5E
196 i. Requisites Villegas v. Subido (GR No. 31711) Hermano https://drive.google.com/open?id=1y1-h2Ud2nrWBu9hjFNhSNqrJdZC_kxTs
197 ii. Gimenez `v. SEC (133 SCRA 840) Hermano https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lXoRLkDj6EVe5e1IlGLNy_MGd4gz7eee
198 iii. Grego v. COMELEC (274 SCRA 481) Hermano https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KNx9Ocv9m2rW-riwtsDl9y7jM0gY2SDh
199 i. Flores v. San Pedro (102 Phil 44) Hermano https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ddWRHRtXY7UyqihYoRx16X8up6Mj9v5Y
200 ii. Vda. de. Urbano v. GSIS (GR No. 137904) Roche https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vdk9bwrM2mM174ZMKMq3uapYY3GJ4glj