Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
004 1
In today’s age of societal thinking, the mind is a set of cognitive features which enables
our minds or conscious experiences, an individual would not be able to understand what makes
them who they are. Correspondingly, in Thomas Nagel’s essay “What Is It Like to Be a Bat,”
Nagel asserts that even though there is an understanding of what it is like to be an organism,
humans are not fully capable of knowing what it is like to be a bat. Furthermore, Nagel backs his
conscious experiences and capabilities of another and to have the same viewpoints. Hence, the
notion of a human experiencing what it is like being a bat: Nagel claims that it is impossible. For
example: If a sightless man or a non-handicapped person tried to understand what it is like for
them to be one another, it is impossible. The main reason being that both men distinguish and
comprehend their sense of vision differently; one has the ability to use their sense of vision,
while the other does not. Thus, connecting back to Nagel’s dispute, without one’s conscious
experiences being the same as another’s, an individual simply cannot honestly know what it is
When Hoffman discusses vision by construction, the same claim can be made to other
senses. All senses have synapses and neurons that are engaged upon use just as our eyes do.
There are just as many intricacies with hearing that make it as analogous as vision, and just as
REFLECTION PAPER PSYC. 101.004 3
important! The hearing constructions humans encounter on a daily basis draw the same
computations and reactions from the ears. Ordinarily, individuals rely on being able to translate
the world around them into accurate sense perceptions (in this instance hearing perception). Yet,
in certain circumstances, the relationship between stimuli and senses breaks down, leading to
some interesting results. All of this could be broken down in the exact same way in which
humans perceive things by using their eyes, albeit with more or less similarities and differences.
REFLECTION PAPER PSYC. 101.004 4
Works Cited
https://organizations.utep.edu/portals/1475/nagel_bat.pdf