Dalis SBM 2018

Department of Education
Region III
DIVISION OF MABALACAT CITY Name of Office:
School-Based Management- SGOD-SMM&E
SELF STUDY REPORT
Control Number: SSR-2018-001
Date: 11-27-2018
SELF STUDY REPORT
Name of School: DOÑA ASUNCION LEE INTEGRATED SCHOOL

School Type: Public Integrated School
Location: Xevera, Tabun, Mabalacat City
Date Established: 2009
Last SBM Level/Rating: Level 2
Name of School Head: Carmela P. Cabrera
The Committees (list down the names)
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

Chairman: Meselemia M. Pamintuan
Secretary: Angelene R. Cruz
Members: Maricel O. Dayrit
Ma. Luisa Maycong
Mary Rose Tayag
Maureen Macaranas
Aljon De Jesus
Imelda Arago
Riza Joy Sicat
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Chairman: Diana Cauguiran
Secretary: Dolores Duncil
Members: Gloria T. Anam
Jaypee P. Dizon
Allen P. Valdez
Rezel Anne C. Dela Cruz
Monica A. Cadiang
Nympha Perico
Debbie Ann Santos
DM - Page 1 of 22
Control Number: ________

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT

Chairman: Julie A. Lavarias
Secretary: Lisa P. Ocampo
Members: Hyacint Miranda
Rose Ann Gonzales
Lisa P. Ocampo
Paulo S. Lozano
Melanie T. Tangtang
Maricel D. Ganiban
Juliane Nicole Paguyo
Frances Ann Pamintuan
IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Chairman: Ismael S. Delos Reyes
Secretary: Bryan Amistad
Members: Mary Grace Macatula
Franz Aldwin Gonzales
REnz B. POlicarpio
Ana I. Ramos
John Vincent V. Bartido
Introduction (Brief background of the school)

DALIS is an initiative of Globe Asiatique in partnership with the E-Media Program of the ABS-CBN
Foundation. The man behind its construction is the President of Globe Asiatique Mr. Delfin S. Lee, the man
who put all his heart to come up with a grandeur school like DALIS. DALIS is named after the mother of
the Mr. Lee, Doña Asuncion Lee.
With an area of five thousand eight hundred forty-four sq. m., Globe Asiatique constructed the 48-
classroom building which was later on donated to the Department of Education (DepEd). DALIS was
officially turned over to the management of the Department of Education in a fitting ceremony organized by
its primary sponsor Mr. Delfin S. Lee last May 15, 2009. Now, DALIS is under Mabalacat East District then
headed by the Schools District Supervisor, Mrs. Carmelita P. Sotto. The school opened its doors to its first batch
of enrollees and teachers last June, 2009 under Mrs. Cristina L. Dizon, Ph. D. as the principal. For the school year
2009-2010 DALIS already had 574 pupils in the Elementary Department and 235 High school students.
DM - Page 2 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE A network of leadership and governance guides

the education system to achieve its shared vision, mission and goals making them
responsive and relevant to the context of diverse environments.
LEADERSHIP
AND LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
GOVERNANCE
1. In place is a LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
Development Plan 0 Not Indicator The Indicator The Indicator
(e.g. SIP) Evident development development The
developed plan guided by plan is evolved development SIP/ Development
collaboratively by the school’s through the plan is enhanced Plan(ACR with
the stakeholders vision, mission shared with the pictorials)
of the school and and goal (VMG) leadership of the community
community. is developed school and the performing the
through the community leadership roles
leadership of the stakeholders and the school
school and the providing
participation of technical
some invited support.
community
stakeholders.
2. The LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

development plan 0 Not Indicator The Indicator The Indicator The
(e.g. SIP) is Evident school leads the school and community
regularly reviewed regular review community stakeholders lead Improved/Adjusted
by the school and stakeholders the regular SIP(letters, ACR)
community to improvement of working as full review and
keep it up the development partners, lead the improvement
responsive and plan. continual review process; the
relevant to and school
emerging needs, improvement of stakeholders
challenges and the development facilitate the
opportunities plan process.
3. The school is LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

organized by a 0 Not Indicator The Indicator The Indicator
clear structure Evident school defines school and Guided by an
and work the community agreed Organizational
arrangements organizational collaboratively organizational Structure with
that promote structure, and define the structure, the TORs
DM - Page 3 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
shared the roles and structure and the community

leadership and responsibilities roles and stakeholders lead
governance and of stakeholders. responsibilities in defining the
define the roles of stakeholders. organizational
and structure and the
responsibilities roles and
of the responsibilities;
stakeholders. school provides
technical and
administrative
support.
4. A leadership LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

network 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator The
facilitates Evident A network has The network network allows
communication been actively provides easy exchange
between and collaboratively stakeholders and access to Report on SIP/AIP
among school established and information for information Year End
and community is continuously making sources beyond Accomplishment
leaders for improved by the decisions and the school Report Cards
informed school solving learning community.
decision-making community. and
and solving of administrative
school- problems.
community
wide-learning
problems
5. A long term LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

program is in 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator
operation that Evident Developing Leaders Leaders assume
addresses the structures are in undertake responsibility for
training and place and training modes their own
development analysis of the that are training and
needs of school competency and convenient to development.
and community development them (on-line, School NCBTS-NCBSSH
leaders. needs of leaders off-line, community TDNA Result
is conducted; modular, group, leaders working IPPD/SPPD
result is used to or home-based) individually or
develop a long and which do in groups, coach
term training not disrupt their and mentor one
and regular another to
development functions. achieve their
program. Leaders monitor VMG.
DM - Page 4 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
and evaluate
their own
learning process.
.
Total 11.48
Weighted Mean 2.30
Weighted Percentage 0.69%
DM - Page 5 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
Findings: Recommendations:
STRENGTHS The development plan of each school
For the past three years, in place is a should be viewed regularly by the
Development Plan (e.g. SIP) developed school community stakeholders to
collaboratively by the stakeholders of the
keep it up responsive to the emerging
school and community.
needs, challenges and different
opportunities.
WEAKNESS
Development plan (e.g. SIP) is regularly
reviewed by the school community to And there should be a long term
keep it up responsive and relevant to program and training in addressing
emerging needs, challenges and the needs of school and community
opportunities leaders.
DM - Page 6 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
Best Features:
SCORE:
Development Plan (e.g. SIP) developed collaboratively by the stakeholders of
=Total Score the school and community.
5 A leadership network facilitates communication between and among school
and community leaders for informed decision-making and solving of school-
community wide-learning problems
Validated By: Conformed by:

_____________________ Carmela P. Cabrera
SBM TEAM School Head
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION The curriculum learning systems anchored on the
community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are collaboratively developed and continuously improved.
CURRICULU
M AND
INSTRUCTIO
LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
N
1. The LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 Indicator Level 3 Indicator
curriculum L 0 Not All types of Programs are The educational Reading Program,
provides for the Evident learners of the fully implemented needs of all types Project All
development school and closely of learners are Numerates,
needs of all community are monitored to being met as Learner’s
types of learners identified, their address shown by Directory,
in the school learning curves performance continuous Digitized
community assessed; discrepancies, improvement on Instructional
appropriate benchmark best learning Materials,
programs with its practices, coach outcomes and Intervention
Materials,
support materials low performers, products of
Narrative Report
for each type of mentor potential learning.
and ACR of the
learner is leaders, reward Teachers’ as well INSETs
developed. high achievement, as students’ conducted,
and maintain performance is Research Outcome
environment that motivated by
makes learning intrinsic rather
meaningful and than extrinsic
enjoyable. rewards. The
schools’
differentiated
programs are
DM - Page 7 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
frequently
benchmarked by
other schools.
2. The LEVE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

implemented L 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator
curriculum is Evident Local beliefs, The localized Best practices in Sample Lesson
localized to norms, values, curriculum is localizing the Plans, Sample
make it more traditions, implemented and curriculum are Performance
meaningful to folklores, current monitored closely mainstreamed and Outputs to
the learners and events, and to ensure that it benchmarked by Improve
applicable to life existing makes learning other schools. Community Life,
in the technologies are more meaningful There is marked Accomplishment
community documented and and pleasurable, increase in Report on the
used to develop a produces desired number of School’s Best
lasting learning projects that uses Practices
curriculum. outcomes, and the community as
Localization directly improves learning
guidelines are community life. laboratory, and
agreed to by Ineffective the school as an
school approaches are agent of change
community and replaced and for improvement
teachers are innovative ones of the
properly oriented. are developed. community.
3. A LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator

representative L 0 Not A representative Learning Materials and Developed
group of school Evident team of school materials and approaches are learning materials,
and community and community approaches to being used in Write up of an
stakeholders stakeholders reinforce school, in the existing
develop the assess content and strengths and family and in community-based
methods and methods used in address community to learning action cell
materials for teaching creative, deficiencies are develop critical,
developing critical thinking developed and creative thinking
creative thinking and problem tested for and problem
& problem solving. applicability on solving
solving Assessment school, family community of
results are used as and community. learners and are
guide to develop producing desired
DM - Page 8 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
materials. results.
4. The learning LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator

systems are L 0 Not A school- based The school- The monitoring
regularly and Evident monitoring and based monitoring system is
collaboratively learning system is and learning accepted and Suggestion Box
monitored by conducted systems generate regularly used for
the community regularly and feedback that is collective
using cooperatively; used for making decision making.
appropriate and feedback is decisions that The monitoring
tools to ensure shared with enhance the total tool has been
the holistic stakeholders. development of improved to
growth and The system uses a learners. provide both
development of tool that monitors A committee take quantitative and
the learners the holistic care of the qualitative data.
and the development of continuous
community.
learners. improvement of
the tool.
5. Appropriate LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator

assessment L 0 Not The assessment The assessment School
tools for Evident tools are reviewed tools are reviewed assessment results Competency
teaching and by the school and by the school are used to Based Test
learning are assessment results community and develop learning Materials duly
continuously are shared with results are shared programs that are checked and
reviewed and school’s with community suited to approved by the
improved, and stakeholders. stakeholders. community, and school head, ACR
assessment customized to on the conduct of
results are each learner’s activity relative to
contextualized sharing assessment
context, results of
to the learner results
which are used
and local for collaborative
situation and decision-making.
the attainment
of relevant life
skills.
DM - Page 9 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
6. Learning LEVE Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

managers and L 0 Not Indicators. indicators. Indicators
facilitators Evident Stakeholders are Stakeholders Learning Four As based
(teachers, aware of child/ begin to practice environments lesson plan,
administrators learner- centered, child/ learner- methods and School and
and community rights- based, and centered resources are Community
members) inclusive principles of community Record of
nurture values principles of education in the driven, inclusive activities showing
and education. design of support and adherent to concern to childen
environments Learning to education. child’s rights and
that are managers and Learning protection
protective of all facilitators managers and requirements.
children and conduct activities facilitators apply Learning
demonstrate aimed to increase the principles in managers and
behaviors
stakeholders designing facilitators
consistent to the
awareness and learning observe learners’
organization’s
commitment to materials. rights from
vision, mission
fundamental designing the
and goals.
rights of children curriculum to
and the basic structuring the
principle of whole learning
educating them. environment.
7. Methods LEVE Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

and resources L 0 Not Indicators. indicators. Indicators.
are learner and Evident Practices, tools Practices, tools There is Learner’s
community- and materials for and materials for continuous Portfolio,
friendly, developing self- developing self- exchange of Budgeted Lesson
enjoyable, directed learners directed learners information, per subject per
safe, inclusive, are highly are beginning to sharing of quarter
accessible and observable in emerge in the expertise and Recognition
aimed at school, but not in homes and in the materials among program per
developing the home or in the community. the schools, quarter, Bulletin
self- directed Board, Parent
community. The program is home and
learners. Teacher
Learning collaboratively community for
Learners are Conference,
programs are implemented and the development
equipped with Functional School
designed and monitored by of self-directed Program to
essential
developed to teachers and learners. produce learners
knowledge,
produce learners parents to ensure The program is who are
skills, and
who are that it produces mainstreamed accountable for
values to
responsible and desired learners. but continuously their learning
assume
DM - Page 10 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
responsibility accountable for improved to (Peer Tutoring)

and their learning. make relevant to
accountability emergent
for their own demands.
learning.
Total 14.17
Weighted Mean 2.02
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
STRENGTH A school- based monitoring and learning system
For three consecutive years, appropriate should be conducted regularly and cooperatively; and
assessment tools for teaching and learning were feedback should be shared with stakeholders.
continuously reviewed and improved, and The system should develop and use a tool that will
assessment results were contextualized to the monitor the holistic development of learner, such as
learner and local situation and the attainment of AIP and SIP.
relevant life skills.
There should be a school- based monitoring and
WEAKNESS learning systems that will generate feedback that will
The learning systems are regularly and be used for making decisions that enhance the total
collaboratively monitored by the community using development of learners.
appropriate tools to ensure the holistic growth and
development of the learners and the community. There should be a designate committee that will take
care of the continuous improvement of the tool. The
committee/ team should be oriented following the
proper procedure with TOR (Terms of Reference).
DM - Page 11 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
Best Features:
SCORE:
Appropriate assessment tools for teaching and learning are continuously reviewed and
= Total Score improved, and assessment results are contextualized to the learner and local situation and
7 the attainment of relevant life skills.
Methods and resources are learner and community- friendly, enjoyable, safe, inclusive,
accessible and aimed at developing self- directed learners. Learners are equipped with
essential knowledge, skills, and values to assume responsibility and accountability for
their own learning.
A representative group of school and community stakeholders develop the methods and
materials for developing creative thinking & problem solving.

______________________ Carmela P. Cabrera
DM - Page 12 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT A clear, transparent,

inclusive, and responsive accountability system is in place, collaboratively developed by
the school community, which monitors performance and acts appropriately on gaps and
gains.
ACCOUNTABILITY
AND CONTINIOUS LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
IMPROVEMENT
1. Roles and LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
responsibilities of 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator Shared Roles &
accountable Evident There is an The stakeholders and participatory responsibilities of
person/s and active party that are engaged in processes are PTA & SSG
collective body/ ies initiates clarifying and used in -SIP TEAM
are clearly defined clarification of defining their determining -Grievance
and agreed upon the roles and specific roles and roles, Committee
by community responsibilities responsibilities. responsibilities
stakeholders. in education and
delivery. accountabilities
of stakeholders in
managing and
supporting
education.
2. Achievement of LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

goals is recognized 0 Not Indicators. Indicators. A Indicators. A School-based
based on a Evident Performance community- community- awards giving &
collaboratively accountability level accepted incentive system
developed is practiced at accountability performance
performance the school system is accountability,
accountability level. evolving from recognition and
system; gaps are school-led incentive
addressed through initiatives. system is being
appropriate action. practiced.
DM - Page 13 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
3. The LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

accountability 0 Not Indicators. Indicators. Indicators. ACR
Evident The school Stakeholders are School -Communication
system is owned Letter
by the community articulates the engaged in the community -Minutes of the
and is accountability development and stakeholders Meeting.
continuously assessment operation of an continuously and -Attendance Sheet
framework with appropriate collaboratively -Pictorials
enhanced to
basic accountability review and
ensure that
components, assessment enhance
management
including system. accountability
structures and implementation systems’
mechanisms are guidelines to processes,
responsive to the the mechanisms and
emerging learning stakeholders. tools.
needs and
demands of the
community
4. Accountability LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
assessment 0 Not Indicators. The Indicators. Indicators.
Evident school, with the Stakeholders are Stakeholders Invitation letter to
criteria and tools,
stakeholders
feedback participation of engaged in the continuously and
-Quarterly
mechanisms, and stakeholders, development and collaboratively accomplished.
information articulates an operation of an review and (MPS)
collection and accountability appropriate enhance -Assessment tools
assessment accountability accountability For SHs, T‘s.
validation
framework with assessment systems;
techniques and
basic system. processes,
processes are components, mechanism and
inclusive and including tools.
collaboratively implementation
developed and guidelines.
agreed upon.
5. Participatory LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
assessment of 0 Not Indicators. Indicators. Indicators.
performance is Evident The school Collaboratively School- Quarterly Report
done regularly initiates conduct of community- on School
periodic performance developed Monitoring
with the
performance assessment performance Evaluation &
community. Adjustment.
Assessment assessment informs planning, assessment is
with the plan adjustments practiced and is
results and
participation of and requirements the basis for
lessons learned
stakeholders. for technical improving
serve a basis for assistance. monitoring and
feedback, evaluation
technical system, providing
DM - Page 14 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
assistance, technical
recognition and assistance, and
plan adjustment. recognizing and
refining plans.
Total 11.32
Weighted Mean 2.26
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT
DM - Page 15 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
DM - Page 16 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
Best Features:
SCORE:
= Total Score
5

_____________________ Carmela P. Cabrera
DM - Page 17 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018

Resources are collectively and judiciously mobilized and managed with transparency, effectiveness, and
efficiency.
MANAGEMEN
T OF LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
RESOURCES
1. Regular LEVEL LEVEL1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
resource 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator MOOE
inventory is Evident Stakeholders are Resource Resource Liquidation,
collaboratively aware that a inventory is inventories are Pledges support
undertaken by regular resource characterized by systematically from
learning inventory is regularity, developed and stakeholders,
managers, available and is increased stakeholders are ACR for resource
learning used as the basis participation of engaged in a generation,
facilitators, and for resource stakeholders, and collaborative
community allocation and communicated to process to make
stakeholders as mobilization. the community as decisions on
basis for the basis for resource
resource resource allocation and
allocation and allocation and mobilization.
mobilization. mobilization.
2. A regular LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Updated

dialogue for 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator transparency
planning and Evident Stakeholders are Stakeholders are Stakeholders board,
resource invited to regularly engaged collaborate to Stakeholders
programming, participate in the in the planning ensure timely and Forum
that is development of and resource need-based
accessible and an educational programming and planning and
plan in resource in the resource
inclusive,
programming and implementation programming and
continuously
in the of the educational support
engage implementation plan. continuous
stakeholders of the educational implementation
and support plan. of the educational
implementation plan.
of community
education
plans.
DM - Page 18 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
3. In place is a LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Write-up on

community- 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator school
developed Evident Stakeholders Stakeholders are Stakeholders community
resource support judicious, engaged and sustain the developed
management appropriate, and share expertise in implementation resource
system that effective use of the collaborative and improvement management
drives resources. development of of a system, ACR on
resource collaboratively Brigada Eskwela,
appropriate
management developed,
behaviors of the
system. periodically
stakeholders to adjusted, and
ensure constituent-
judicious, focused resource
appropriate, management
and effective system.
use of
resources.
4. Regular LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 ACR on the
monitoring, 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator development and
evaluation, and Evident Stakeholders are Stakeholders Stakeholders are implementation of
invited to collaboratively engaged, held monitoring,
reporting evaluation, and
processes of participate in the participate in the accountable and
reporting processes
resource development and development and implement a
on resource
management implementation implementation collaboratively management,
of monitoring, of monitoring, developed a
are
evaluation and evaluation and system of
collaboratively
reporting reporting monitoring,
developed and processes on resource evaluation and
implemented resource management. reporting
by the learning management. resource
managers, management.
facilitators and
community
stakeholders.
DM - Page 19 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
5. There is a LEVEL LEVEL1 LEVEL2 LEVEL3 Deed of

system that 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator Donations and
manages the Evident An engagement Stakeholders An established pledges ,
network and procedure to support a system system of Sustained income
linkages which identify and of partnerships partnership is generating
strengthen and utilize for improving managed and
sustain partnerships with resource sustained by the
stakeholders for management. stakeholders for
partnerships for
improving continuous
improving
resource improvement of
resource management is resource
management. evident. management.
Total 11.98
Weighted Mean 2.40
DM - Page 20 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
-Quarterly/Annual SMEA report -Division training/seminar workshop for SMEA

-Copy of the Barangay /Municipal/ Provincial -Copy of Annual Budget Plan must be given
Annual Budget plan reflecting allocation for the to the division/school
school
-Copy of resolution for IRA, Municipal /Provincial - The school must have Alumni Coordinator
SEF
-Copy of the disbursement voucher of the fund
allocated for the school with photocopied cheque
-Tracking of successful alumnis
DM - Page 21 of 22

Date: __________________
Region III
SELF STUDY REPORT
Date: 11-27-2018
Best Features:
SCORE:
-SSG income generated projects
= Total Score -Science Club Yes-O income generated projects.
5 -Deed of Donations
-No adverse COA findings on liquidation of MOOE
=4

ISMAEL S. DELOS REYES CARMELA P. CABRERA
DM - Page 22 of 22

Date: __________________

Dalis SBM 2018

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Dalis SBM 2018

Caricato da

Copyright:

Department of Education

SELF STUDY REPORT

Name of School: DOÑA ASUNCION LEE INTEGRATED SCHOOL

The Committees (list down the names)

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Control Number: ________

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Introduction (Brief background of the school)

Control Number: ________

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE A network of leadership and governance guides

2. The LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

3. The school is LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

Control Number: ________

shared the roles and structure and the community

4. A leadership LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

5. A long term LEVEL LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

Control Number: ________

Control Number: ________

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

Control Number: ________

Validated By: Conformed by:

Control Number: ________

2. The LEVE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

3. A LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator

Control Number: ________

4. The learning LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator

5. Appropriate LEVE Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator

Control Number: ________

6. Learning LEVE Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

7. Methods LEVE Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

Control Number: ________

responsibility accountable for improved to (Peer Tutoring)

Control Number: ________

Validated By: Conformed by:

Control Number: ________

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT A clear, transparent,

2. Achievement of LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

Control Number: ________

3. The LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

Control Number: ________

Control Number: ________

Control Number: ________

Validated By: Conformed by:

Control Number: ________

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

2. A regular LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Updated

Control Number: ________

3. In place is a LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 Write-up on

Control Number: ________

5. There is a LEVEL LEVEL1 LEVEL2 LEVEL3 Deed of

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Control Number: ________

-Quarterly/Annual SMEA report -Division training/seminar workshop for SMEA

Control Number: ________

Validated By: Conformed by:

Control Number: ________

Potrebbero piacerti anche