Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
International Political Economy (IPE) refers to “the study of the interplay of economics and politics in
the world arena” (Frieden/Lake 2000), asking how politics affect markets and vice versa.
Traditionally, IPE research has emphasized issues such as trade, production and investment.
However, issues such as migration and the environment are increasingly being addressed, and IPE
does not ignore the role of power dynamics in international politics.
In this class we first turn to IPE’s theoretical foundations; then we apply them to different issue
areas. The theoretical part focuses on the contemporary mainstream literature, but includes earlier
approaches as well as critical perspectives. In the end, students will have an idea of how the
discipline evolved and what the main theoretical arguments are. In the issue-specific part of the class
we address typical issues and themes such as trade and production, with emphasis on recent trends.
Important information
Please make sure to sign up on Moodle. The password for this class is “IPEIntro”.
I expect all students to carefully read the texts and to participate in discussions. I require everyone to
submit comments and/or questions related to the literature until 9 in the morning on Tuesday. I will
set up Moodle in a way that makes this process very convenient for you and me.
In accordance with the examination regulations, you have to write a paper of 20-25 pages to receive
a grade for this class. We will use the last session of the semester to discuss your paper ideas, which
means that you should have developed a short exposé until then. I am happy to talk about project
ideas and will provide information on formal criteria via Moodle.
We will discuss in English. You are free to submit written assignments in English or German.
Introductory literature
Broome, André (2014): Issues & Actors in the Global Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Blyth, Mark (ed.) (2009): Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE). Routledge.
Cohn, Theodore H. (2010): Global Political Economy. Theory and Practice. 5th edition. Pearsson.
Cohn, Theodore H. (2016): Global Political Economy. Theory and Practice. 7th edition. Routledge.
Cohen, Benjamin J. (2008): International Political Economy. An Intellectual History. Princeton University Press
Phillips, Nicola (ed.) (2005): Globalizing International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ravenhill, John (ed.) (2014): Global Political Economy. 4th edition. Oxford University Press.
1
Schedule and readings
*** = optional readings
*** Pickel, Andreas (2005): Introduction: False Oppositions. Recontextualizing Economic Nationalism
in a Globalizing World. In: Helleiner, Eric/ Andreas Pickel (eds.): Economic Nationalism in a
Globalizing World. Cornell University Press, 1-17.
*** Gilpin, Robert (2001): Global Political Economy. Understanding the International Economic Order,
chapter 1 (The New Global Economic Order)
*** Keohane, Robert O./ Joseph S. Nye (2003): Realism and Complex Interdependence. In: Goddard,
C. Roe/ Patrick Cronin/ Kishore C. Dash (eds.), International Political Economy. State-Market
Relations in a Changing Global Order. 2nd Edition. Lynne Rienner, 49-58.
Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. (2010): Capital Ideas. The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization.
Princeton University Press, 1-22.
*** Duina, Francesco (2010): Frames, Scripts, and the Making of Regional Trade Areas. In: Abdelal,
Rawi/ Mark Blyth/ Craig Parsons (eds.), Constructing the International Economy. Cornell University
Press, 93-113.
*** Bedford, Kate/ Shirin M. Rai (2010): Feminists Theorize International Political Economy. Signs:
Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1086/652910
2
*** van Apeldoorn, Bastian (2001): The Struggle over European Order. Transnational Class Agency in
the Making of ‘Embedded Neo-Liberalism’. In: Bieler, Andreas/ Andrew Morton (eds.), Social Forces
in the Making of the New Europe. Palgrave, 70-89.
*** Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice (2005): After Developmentalism and Globalization, What? Social
Forces 83(3), 1263-1278. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0049
Gertz, Geoffrey (2017): What will Trump’s embrace of bilateralism mean for America’s trade
partners? Brookings Future Development Blog, Feb 8, 2017. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-
development/2017/02/08/what-will-trumps-embrace-of-bilateralism-mean-for-americas-trade-
partners/
*** Griswold, Daniel T. (2010): Free Trade Agreements: Steppingstones to a more Open world. In:
Thomas Oatley (Ed.), Debates in International Political Economy. Longman, 68-75.
*** Bhagwatil, Jagdish (2010): Why PTAs Are a Pox on the World Trading System. In: Thomas Oatley
(Ed.), Debates in International Political Economy. Longman, 76-91.
Spar, Debora/ David Yoffie (2010): Multinational Enterprises and the Prospects for Justice, in:
Thomas Oatley (Ed.), Debates in International Political Economy. Longman, 151-166.
Drezner, Daniel W. (2010): Bottom Feeders. In: Thomas Oatley (Ed.), Debates in International Political
Economy. Longman, 167-175.
Simmons, Beth A. (2014): Bargaining over BITs, Arbitrating Awards: The Regime for Protection and
Promotion of International Investment. World Politics 66(1), 12-46.
*** Pauly, Louis W. (2014): The Political Economy of Global Financial Crises. In: John Ravenhill (Ed.),
Global Political Economy. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 198-222.
3
Week 13 · January 9, 2018 · Economic power and hegemony
Kirshner, Jonathan (2008): Dollar Primacy and American Power. What’s at Stake? Review of
International Political Economy 15(3), 418-438.
Starrs, Sean (2013): American Economic Power Hasn’t Declined—It Globalized! Summoning the Data
and Taking Globalization Seriously. International Studies Quarterly 57(4), 817–830.
***Strange, Susan (1987): The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony. International Organization 41(4),
551-574.
*** Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice (2008): The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the
Capitalist World-Economy. In: Angus Cameron/ Anastasia Nesvetailova/ Ronen Palan (Ed.),
International Political Economy. Vol. II. Sage, 209-217.
Bremmer, Ian (2009): State Capitalism Comes of Age: The End of the Free Market? Foreign Affairs
88(3), 40-55.
*** Barrow, Clyde W. (2005): The Return of the State: Globalization, State Theory, and the New
Imperialism. New Political Science 27(2), 123-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393140500098235
*** Levy, Jonah D./ Stephan Leibfried/ Frank Nullmeier (2015): Changing Perspectives on the State.
In: Stephan Leibfried/ Evelyne Huber/ Matthew Lange/ Jonah D. Levy/ Frank Nullmeier/ John D.
Stephens (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford University Press, 33-57.
Rodrik, Dani (2017): Is Global Equality the Enemy of National Equality? Harvard Kennedy School
Working Paper No. RWP17-003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910603
*** Deaton, Angus (2010): Price Indexes, Inequality, and the Measurement of World Poverty.
American Economic Review, 100(1): 5-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.5
*** Wade, Robert H. (2014): Growth, Inequality, and Poverty. Evidence, Arguments, and Economists.
In: John Ravenhill (Ed.), Global Political Economy. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 305-343.
*** Cohn, Theodore H. (2016): Chapter 12 – Current Trends in the Global Political Economy. In: Cohn,
Theodore H., Global Political Economy. Theory and Practice. Seventh edition. Routledge, 385-409.