Ace Navigation Co., Inc. v. FGU Insurance Corporation, G.R. No.

171591, June 25, 2012

FACTS:

CARDIA shipped on board M/V PAKARTI cements to be discharged at Manila Port and delivered to
HEINDRICH. The shipment was ensured by FGU and PIONEER. The ship was owned by PAKARTI,
chartered to SHINWA. SHINWA chartered to SKY, agent of KEE YEH. KEE YEH chartered to REGENCY.

Upon inspection of HEINDRICH and petitioner ACENAV, agent of CARDIA, it was found that out of the
165,200 bags of cement, 43,905 bags were in bad order and condition.

HEINDRICH filed for damages against CARDIA and REGENCY.

In their answer with counterclaim and cross-claim, PAKARTI and SHINWA alleged that the suits against
them cannot prosper because they were not named as parties in the bill of lading.

ACENAV claimed that, not being privy to the bill of lading, it was not a real party-in-interest from whom
the respondents can demand compensation.

SKY denied having acted as agent of the charterer, KEE YEH, which chartered the vessel from SHINWA,
which originally chartered the vessel from PAKARTI. SKY also averred that it cannot be sued as an agent
without impleading its alleged principal, KEE YEH.

SKY manifested that it will no longer pursue its petition and wait for the resolution filed by PAKARTI and
SHINWA. Likewise, PAKARTI and SHINWA moved for the withdrawal of their petitions. Only the petition
of ACENAV remained.

ISSUE:

WON ACENAV liable.

RULING:

NO.

A bill of lading is defined as “an instrument in writing, signed by a carrier or his agent, describing the
freight so as to identify it, stating the name of the consignor, the terms of the contract for carriage, and
agreeing or directing that the freight to be delivered to the order or assigns of a specified person at a
specified place.” It operates both as a receipt and as a contract. As a receipt, it recites the date and place
of shipment, describes the goods as to quantity, weight, dimensions, identification marks and condition,
quality, and value. As a contract, it names the contracting parties, which include the consignee, fixes the
route, destination, and freight rates or charges, and stipulates the rights and obligations assumed by the
parties. As such, it shall only be binding upon the parties who make them, their assigns and heirs.

In this case, the original parties to the bill of lading are: (a) the shipper CARDIA; (b) the carrier PAKARTI;
and (c) the consignee HEINDRICH. However, by virtue of their relationship with PAKARTI under separate
charter arrangements, SHINWA, KEE YEH and its agent SKY likewise became parties to the bill of lading.
In the same vein, ACENAV, as admitted agent of CARDIA, also became a party to the said contract of
carriage.

Article 586 of the Code of Commerce provides:

“ART. 586. The shipowner and the ship agent shall be civilly liable for the acts of the captain and for the
obligations contracted by the latter to repair, equip, and provision the vessel, provided the creditor
proves that the amount claimed was invested therein.

By ship agent is understood the person entrusted with the provisioning of a vessel, or who represents her
in the port in which she may be found.”

Corollarily, Article 1897 of the same Code provides that an agent is not personally liable to the party
with whom he contracts, unless he expressly binds himself or exceeds the limits of his authority without
giving such party sufficient notice of his powers.

Both exceptions do not obtain in this case. Records are bereft of any showing that ACENAV exceeded its
authority in the discharge of its duties as a mere agent of CARDIA. Neither was it alleged, much less
proved, that ACENAV’s limited obligation as agent of the shipper, CARDIA, was not known to
HEINDRICH.

Furthermore, since CARDIA was not impleaded as a party in the instant suit, the liability attributed upon
it by the CA on the basis of its finding that the damage sustained by the cargo was due to improper
packing cannot be borne by ACENAV. As mere agent, ACENAV cannot be made responsible or held
accountable for the damage supposedly caused by its principal.