LC Paper No.

CB(1)456/18-19(03)
For discussion
on 22 January 2019

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
PANEL ON DEVELOPMENT

Kwu Tung North and Fanling North

New Development Areas –
Funding Applications for Main Works, Detailed Design and
Special Ex-gratia Cash Allowance

PURPOSE

This paper briefs Members on the following funding applications in

relation to the Kwu Tung North (“KTN”) and Fanling North (“FLN”) New
Development Areas (“NDAs”) development:

Main Works for First Phase Development

(a) upgrading of 7747CL and 7759CL to Category A for
carrying out advance and first stage site formation and
engineering infrastructure works to support the First Phase
development of the KTN and FLN NDAs ( “Advance
Works” and “First Stage Works” ) (Enclosures 1 and 2);

Detailed Design for Remaining Phase Development

(b) upgrading of part of 7828CL to Category A for engaging
consultants to undertake detailed design and site
investigation for the Remaining Phase development of the
KTN and FLN NDAs ( “Detailed Design”) (Enclosure 3) ;

Co-location of Police Facilities at Kong Nga Po

(c) upgrading of 7793CL to Category A for carrying out site
formation and engineering infrastructure works for
co-location of police facilities at Kong Nga Po so as to free
up sites within the KTN and FLN NDAs for other uses (the
“KNP Works”) (Enclosure 4);
 Shek Wu Hui Effluent Polishing Plant
(d) upgrading of 4388DS to Category A for redeveloping the
existing Shek Wu Hui Sewage Treatment Works
(“SWHSTW”) into an Effluent Polishing Plant to cope with
additional sewage treatment demand arising from the KTN
and FLN NDAs and other new developments and enhance its
environmental performance (“SWHEPP”) (Enclosure 5);
and

Funding allocation for Special Ex-gratia Cash Allowance Subhead

(e) allocation of funding to subhead 37CA under Head 701 –
Land Acquisition for payment of the Special Ex-gratia Cash
Allowance (“SEGCA”) to eligible domestic households
affected by the land resumption and clearance of the KTN
and FLN NDAs (Enclosure 6).

OVERVIEW

2. NDA projects in the New Territories, including the KTN and FLN
NDAs, form a core part of our multi-pronged land supply strategy in the medium
and long term. After more than 10 years of planning, consultation and
preparation, the funding applications in paragraph 1 above, if approved by the
Legislative Council (“LegCo”), will take the two NDA projects to another key
stage - land resumption and clearance for the First Phase development will
commence in the second half of 2019, and the projects are poised to enter the
construction phase.

3. Upon full development, the KTN and FLN NDAs will yield a total
of about 71 800 housing units (of which about 48 500 or nearly 70% are public
housing), accommodating additional population of about 188 100; and provide
about 868 000 square metres (m2) commercial floor areas which together with
proposed community uses will generate some 40 100 job opportunities.
Population intake is expected to start in 2023, and infrastructure works to
complete in 2031.

4. The KTN and FLN NDAs will be implemented in two phases: First
Phase and Remaining Phase. The entire development involves resumption of
about 180 hectares (ha) of private land under Land Resumption Ordinance (Cap.
124) and other legislation, as well as clearance of about 230 ha of government
land. The resumption and clearance exercise will affect about 4 200 people in
1 500 households, and 440 business undertakings (including brownfield
operations).

2
5. For the First Phase of the NDAs development, we will resume about
68 ha of private land and clear about 100 ha of government land. The land
resumption and clearance will affect about 445 households involving about 1 160
persons and some 3 482 domestic and ancillary structures. About 140 business
and industrial undertakings and 18 graves and two urns have to be cleared.
Apart from the provisions for statutory compensation under the relevant
ordinances, we will offer various prevailing administrative ex-gratia allowances
to affected eligible landowners and occupiers and, where eligible, rehousing
arrangements to residents affected by clearances on an ex-gratia basis in
accordance with the unified and enhanced ex-gratia compensation and rehousing
(“C&R”) arrangement.

6. Key figures of the KTN and FLN NDAs are tabulated below -

First Phase Remaining Phase Entire Development

Housing yield 21 000 units 50 800 units 71 800 units
(public housing) (18 000 units) (30 500 units) (48 500 units)
Commercial floor areas 102 500 m2 765 500 m2 868 000 m2
Private lots resumed 68 ha 114 ha 182 ha
Government land cleared 100 ha 133 ha 233 ha
Households affected 445 1 062 1 507
Business undertakings affected 141 302 443
Main works programme 2019-2026 2024-2031 2019-2031

Main Works for First Phase Development and Detailed Design for
Remaining Phase Development

7. The First Phase development comprises the Advance Works under

7747CL and First Stage Works under 7759CL. Specifically, it covers site
formation and engineering infrastructure works (including drainage, sewerage,
waterworks, landscaping works and slope works); construction of the eastern
section of the Fanling Bypass (FLBP) connecting the FLN NDA to Fanling
Highway, junction improvements, local roads and cycle tracks; establishment of
the Long Valley Nature Park and reprovisioning of egretry sites as ecological
mitigation measures; and reprovisioning of public facilities.

8. In tandem with the implementation of the First Phase development,

we will commence the Detailed Design for Remaining Phase under 7828CL to
expedite project delivery. The Remaining Phase covers the remaining site
formation and engineering infrastructure works; construction of the western
section of FLBP, Po Shek Wu Flyover, local roads and cycle tracks; and widening
of Fanling Highway for connection to KTN NDA. Under this exercise we will
also identify alternative uses for six sites within the two NDAs that are no longer
required for their originally intended uses owing to changing circumstances,

3
including the four sites to be freed up upon co-location of police facilities in Kong
Nga Po as discussed in the following paragraph.

Co-location of Police Facilities at Kong Nga Po

9. Two sites within the KTN NDA are currently occupied by Police’s
firing range and helipad facilities, while another two sites within the FLN NDA
have been reserved for reprovisioning existing police training facilities at Fan
Garden near Fanling. There are merits consolidating all these police facilities in
a single location. We propose to carry out site formation and engineering
infrastructure as well as road improvement works under 7739CL for co-location
of the above police facilities at Kong Nga Po in the New Territories North. The
co-location can release four sites within the NDAs for other more beneficial uses.
It can also enhance Police’s operational efficiency.

Shek Wu Hui Effluent Polishing Plant

10. The SHWSTW is currently a secondary sewage treatment plant

with planned capacity expected to be fully utilised by 2022. To cope with
projected additional sewage treatment demand arising from the KTN and FLN
NDAs and other new developments, we propose to redevelop the existing
SWHSTW into an Effluent Polishing Plant under 4388DC to expand its treatment
capacity and upgrade the sewage treatment level to tertiary standard.

Funding Allocation for Special Ex-gratia Cash Allowance Subhead

11. In July 2018, while endorsing the unified and enhanced general
ex-gratia C&R package for government development clearance exercises
including the clearance for the KTN and FLN NDAs, the Finance Committee
(“FC”) also agreed that the SEGCA arrangement should be retained as an
additional option for eligible households affected by clearance for the two NDAs
and accordingly approved the creation of a new subhead 37CA under Head
701 – Lands Acquisition. We propose to earmark an allocation for the new
subhead to meet anticipated funding need.

12. Details of the above proposals and justifications are at Enclosures 1

to 6 respectively.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

13. We estimate that the total costs in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices

of the proposed works/detailed design are as follows:

4
 $ million
(a) First Phase Development - 18,216.5
7747CL – Advance Works
7759CL – First Stage Works

(b) Remaining Phase Development - 764.5

7828CL – Detailed Design

(c) 7793CL – KNP Works 1,913.0

(d) 4388DS – SWHEPP 11,972.8

Total 32,866.8

14. We estimate the total cost of SEGCA for eligible households

affected by the KTN and FLN NDAs development to be $732.6 million.

15. Apart from the proposed SEGCA provision, we estimate that the
cost of land acquisition and payment of other ex-gratia payment for the First
Phase development is about $13,335 million, which will be charged to Subhead
1100CA of Head 701 – Land Acquisition under Capital Works Reserve Fund
(CWRF) (Paper No. PWSC(2018-19)35). The funding approval for block
allocations under CWRF for each financial year will be separately sought per
established procedures. No land resumption or clearance is required for the
KNP Works and the SWHEPP project.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

16. For the KTN and FLN NDAs development, in addition to the
statutory procedures in respect of town planning and road/sewerage works, since
the announcement of the unified and enhanced general ex-gratia C&R
arrangement for government development clearance exercises in May 2018, we
have been briefing the LegCo and local stakeholders (such as relevant District
Councils and Rural Committees) as well as clearees (including residents’ groups
and concern groups) affected by key development clearance exercises in the
pipeline (including the KTN and FLN NDAs) on various occasions regarding the
C&R arrangement. Separate meetings have also been held to meet specific
groups to address their other concerns about the KTN and FLN NDA projects.
In June 2018, while rendering support to the enhanced C&R package, the North
District Council (NDC) also endorsed the implementation of the KTN and FLN

5
NDAs and SWHEPP. In addition, the District Minor Works and Environmental
Improvement Committee of the NDC supported the works for co-locating police
facilities in Kong Nga Po at its meeting in November 2016.

WAY FORWARD

17. Members are invited to consider the funding applications in relation

to the KTN and FLN NDAs development as set out in paragraph 1 above.
Subject to Members’ comments, we plan to consult the Public Works
Subcommittee on the funding applications and seek the approval of the FC in the
first quarter of 2019.

18. Meanwhile, we will continue to make preparations for land

resumption and clearance for the First Phase development. A summary of
progress with such preparation work is at Enclosure 7.

Development Bureau
January 2019

6
 Enclosure 1

HEAD 707 – NEW TOWNS AND URBAN AREA DEVELOPMENT

Civil Engineering – Land development

7747CL – Advance site formation and engineering infrastructure works at

Kwu Tung North new development area and Fanling North new
development area

PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE

The proposed scope of works under 7747CL (the “Advance Works”)

comprises –

(a) site formation of about 70 hectares (ha) of land (including soil

treatment works) in the Kwu Tung North (“KTN”) and
Fanling North (“FLN”) New Development Areas (“NDAs”);

(b) construction of the eastern section of Fanling Bypass

(“FLBP(E)”) of about 4 kilometres (km) long, which is a dual
two-lane carriageway connecting the FLN NDA to Fanling
Highway, and about 10 km of local roads and about 4 km
cycle tracks, and associated junction/road improvements;

(c) engineering infrastructure works including drainage, sewerage

(including two sewage pumping stations), waterworks
(including a fresh water service reservoir of about 27 500
cubic metres (m3) capacity and a flushing water service
reservoir of about 11 500 m3 capacity in the KTN NDA),
landscaping works and slopeworks;

(d) part expansion and upgrading of Shek Wu Hui Sewage

Treatment Works (“SWHSTW”) to increase its capacity by 20
000 m3 per day;

(e) reprovisioning works; and

(f) implementation of environmental mitigation measures and

environmental monitoring and audit (“EM&A”) programme
for the works mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (e) above.
2. WLayout plans showing the proposed works are at Annex 1 to this
Enclosure. Details of the proposed FLBP(E) connecting Fanling Highway, Lung
Yeuk Tau Interchange of “FLBP(E)”, two sewage pumping stations, two service
reservoirs and junction improvement at Pak Shek Au are at Annex 2 to Annex 6
to this Enclosure.

3. Subject to funding approval of the Finance Committee (“FC”) of the

Legislative Council (“LegCo”), we plan to commence construction of the
proposed works in the third quarter of 2019 for completion in end 2026. To meet
the works programme, the Civil Engineering and Development Department
(CEDD) will invite tenders for the works contracts from February 2019
progressively, but the works contracts will only be awarded upon obtaining
funding approval from the FC.

JUSTIFICATION

4. We are determined to press ahead with the implementation of the KTN

and FLN NDAs as a medium and long-term measure to increase land supply.
Upon full development, the KTN and FLN NDAs will yield a total of about 71
800 housing units (of which about 48 500 or nearly 70% are public housing),
accommodating a new population of about 188 100; and also about 868 000
square metres (m2) floor area for economic activities, generating some 40 100
employment opportunities 1.

5. The KTN and FLN NDAs will be implemented in two phases: First
Phase and Remaining Phase. As part of the First Phase development, we need to
carry out the Advance Works to provide land for housing, community and other
developments from 2022 onwards and more importantly to support housing
development which aims for first population intake in 2023. The Advance
Works will support -

(a) residential developments with about 21 000 flats, of which

about 18 000 flats are public housing, for a new population
of about 52 900; and

(b) commercial uses with about 102 500 m2 floor area, creating
about 4 100 employment opportunities 2.

1
The total employment opportunities of 40 100 include those to be generated from the planned
“government, institution or community” uses.
2
The employment opportunities of 4 100 exclude those to be generated from the planned “government,
institution or community” uses for which the breakdown by phases is not available.

2
6. To support the KTN and FLN NDAs development, it is necessary to
improve the infrastructure in the vicinity, including the provision of FLBP(E) to
carry the new traffic demand arising from the NDAs development as well as to
divert existing traffic of Sha Tau Kok Road from entering Fanling/Sheung Shui
Town Centre to upkeep the traffic conditions at acceptable level there, and other
road improvement works to enhance the performance of junctions at the existing
road network, and provision of drainage, sewerage and waterworks systems. As
the existing sewerage system would not have sufficient coverage and capacity to
cater for the additional sewage discharge from the developments in the NDAs, it
is necessary to construct new sewage pumping stations with associated sewers as
well as to partly expand and upgrade the existing SWHSTW. In order to
minimise the interface problem, the Drainage Services Department will undertake
the part expansion and upgrading works of SWHSTW under 7747CL, i.e. to
increase its capacity by 20 000 m3 per day to cope with projected sewage
treatment demand arising from the First Phase development, for parallel
implementation of the remaining expansion and upgrading works for converting
SWHSTW into an effluent polishing plant under the works contracts of 4388DS –
Shek Wu Hui Effluent Polishing Plant in one go. Regarding waterworks, the
existing water supply system is not sufficient to accommodate the need of the
planned population and thus requires the provision of a new water supply system
including watermain distribution networks and service reservoirs.

7. The soil in the KTN NDA contains naturally-occurring arsenic

material. Notwithstanding the negligibly low risk associated with this natural
material as concluded in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report for
the North East New Territories NDAs Planning and Engineering Study (“NENT
NDAs Study”) 3, which was approved with conditions under the Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap. 499) in October 2013, we will
strictly comply with the recommendations and approval conditions of the EIA
report in carrying out the soil treatment works for the hotspots with high levels of
arsenic.

8. Some sites/facilities, such as the North District Temporary Wholesale

Market for Agricultural Products, the On Lok Mun Street Playground and a
bus-bus interchange at Fanling Highway will be affected by the NDAs
development and its associated engineering infrastructure works. Relevant
reprovisioning works will be included under the Advance Works.

3
The North East New Territories New Development Areas Planning and Engineering Study was a
planning and engineering study to establish a planning and development framework for the KTN, FLN and
Ping Che/Ta Kwu Ling NDAs.

3
9. To tie in with the NDAs development, timely completion of the
engineering infrastructure works as well as the formation of the land parcels is
necessary. Upon completion, the formed land will be handed over by phases to
relevant parties for housing and other developments and the infrastructure works
will be handed over to relevant government departments for management and
maintenance.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

10. We estimate the capital cost of the Advance Works to be $17,320.1

million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

11. The draft Outline Zoning Plans (“OZPs”) for the KTN and FLN NDAs
were exhibited for public inspection under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap.
131) from 20 December 2013 to 20 February 2014. During the statutory
planning process, a total of more than 53 000 representations and comments were
received. After giving consideration to the representations and comments in
April 2015, the Town Planning Board decided not to propose any amendments to
the draft OZPs to meet the representations. On 16 June 2015, the Chief
Executive in Council approved the KTN and FLN OZPs, which were then
exhibited for public inspection on 19 June 2015.

12. The proposed road scheme (the “Road Scheme”) under the Roads
(Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap. 370) and the proposed sewerage
scheme (the “Sewerage Scheme”) under Cap. 370 as applied by the Water
Pollution Control (Sewerage) Regulation (Cap. 358AL) under the Advance Works
were gazetted on 31 December 2015 and 8 January 2016. A total of 5 932 4 and
5 757 5 objections to the Road Scheme and the Sewerage Scheme were received
respectively during the statutory objection period. 35 out of 5 932 objections to
the Road Scheme and 26 out of 5 757 objections to the Sewerage Scheme were
subsequently withdrawn unconditionally and considered resolved. To ameliorate
the effects of the proposed works in addressing the public concerns and to
accommodate design development, amendments to the Road Scheme (the
“Amendment Road Scheme”) and the Sewerage Scheme (the “Amendment
Sewerage Scheme”) were respectively developed and gazetted on 18 and 25

4
Among them, 5 725 objections were received through standard letters.
5
Among them, 5 725 objections were received through standard letters.

4
November 2016. Another 5 501 6 and 5 048 7 objections to the Amendment
Road Scheme and the Amendment Sewerage Scheme were received respectively.
24 out of 5 501 objections to the Amendment Road Scheme and 18 out of 5 048
objections to the Amendment Sewerage Scheme were subsequently withdrawn
unconditionally and considered resolved. The unresolved objections were
mainly related to the overall planning and development of the KTN and FLN
NDAs, resumption of land affected by the proposed works, compensation and
rehousing (C&R) arrangement for affected villagers, as well as health risks,
environmental and traffic impacts arising from the proposed works.

13. In response to the public views on C&R arrangements, the Government

announced on 10 May 2018 the unified and enhanced general ex-gratia C&R
arrangement for government development clearance exercises (the “unified and
enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement”). The unified and enhanced ex-gratia
C&R arrangement relating to various existing and new ex-gratia allowances
(EGAs) was approved by FC on 18 July 2018. We have provided the relevant
information of the unified and enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement to the
objectors who expressed concerns on the C&R arrangement during the statutory
objection period for the Road Scheme, the Amendment Road Scheme, the
Sewerage Scheme and the Amendment Sewerage Scheme as mentioned in
paragraph 12 above. Subsequent to the further comments submitted by the
objectors and the announcement of the unified and enhanced ex-gratia C&R
arrangement, 52 out of 5 932 objections to the Road Scheme and 43 out of 5 757
objections to the Sewerage Scheme were eventually withdrawn unconditionally
and considered resolved. 34 out of 5 501 objections to the Amendment Road
Scheme and 28 out of 5 048 objections to the Amendment Sewerage Scheme were
eventually withdrawn unconditionally and considered resolved. The remaining
objections were considered unresolved.

14. Having considered the unresolved objections and the proposed road
and sewerage works as described in the Road and Sewerage Schemes as amended
by the Amendment Road and Sewerage Schemes as well as the associated
modification 8, the Chief Executive in Council authorised the works. The notices
of authorisation were gazetted on 14 December 2018.

15. Following the announcement of the unified and enhanced ex-gratia

C&R arrangement on 10 May 2018, we briefed the LegCo and local stakeholders
(such as relevant District Councils and Rural Committees) as well as the clearees
(including residents’ groups and concern groups) affected by key development

6
Among them, 4 363 objections were received through standard letters.
7
Among them, 4 363 objections were received through standard letters.
8
The modification involves the reduction of the works area of about 44 m2 and deletion of land
resumption area of about 1921.2 m2 in FLN NDA.

5
clearance exercises in the pipeline (including the KTN and FLN NDAs) on
various occasions regarding the C&R arrangement as well as major concerns in
relation to the NDAs from May 2018 to January 2019. On 14 June 2018, the
North District Council (NDC) was consulted on and supported the unified and
enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement and the implementation of the KTN and
FLN NDAs, including the proposed Advance Works.

16. Further to the support of the Traffic and Transport Committee of the
Tai Po District Council (TPDC T&TC) to the Advance Works given at their
meeting on 11 September 2015, we updated the TPDC T&TC on 9 November
2018 regarding the proposed works on the connection of the FLBP(E) to Fanling
Highway under the Advance Works and received no objection.

17. We will maintain close dialogues with local stakeholders, including the
affectees, residents’ groups as well as the NDC Members, TPDC Members, the
Fanling District Rural Committee, the Sheung Shui District Rural Committee and
the Tai Po Rural Committee throughout the implementation of the Advance
Works.

18. We consulted the Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges

and Associated Structures 9 on the proposed aesthetic design of the major highway
structures of the Advance Works. The Committee accepted the proposed
aesthetic design.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

19. The NENT NDAs Study is a Designated Project (DP) under Schedule 3
of the EIAO (Cap. 499). Some of the proposed works under the NENT NDAs
are DPs under Schedule 2 of the EIAO and Environment Permits (EPs) are
required for their construction and operation.

20. In October 2013, the EIA report for the NENT NDAs was approved
with conditions under the EIAO. The relevant EPs for construction and operation
were issued in November 2013. The EIA report concluded that the
environmental impacts of the NENT NDAs can be controlled to within the criteria
under the EIAO and the Technical Memorandum on EIA Process. We will

9
The Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated Structures, comprising
representatives of the Hong Kong Institute of Architects, the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, the
Hong Kong Institute of Planners, the Architectural Services Department, the Highways Department, the
Housing Department, the CEDD, and architectural or relevant faculties from local institutions, is
responsible for vetting the design of bridges and other structures associated with the highway system,
including noise barriers and enclosures, from the aesthetic and visual impact points of view.

6
implement the measures recommended in the approved EIA report, and comply
with the relevant conditions under the EPs. The key measures include soil
treatment works for hotspots identified with high level of arsenic, noise barriers
on the FLBP(E) and other road sections, and odour control measures for
SWHSTW. We have included the cost of implementing the environmental
mitigation measures as well as the EM&A programme in the overall project
estimate.

21. For controlling the short-term environmental impacts caused by the

proposed works during construction, we will incorporate the recommended
mitigation measures and implementation of EM&A programme into the relevant
works contracts to control environmental impacts arising from the construction
works to comply with established standard and guidelines. These measures
include regular watering of exposed site area to reduce emission of fugitive dust,
the use of movable noise barriers and of quiet plant to reduce noise generation,
and the use of trucks with cover or enclosed containers for waste transportation.

22. At the planning and design stages, we have considered all the proposed
works and construction sequences to reduce generation of construction waste
where possible. In addition, we will require the contractors to reuse insert
construction waste (e.g. excavated soil) on site or in other suitable construction
sites as far as possible in order to minimise the disposal of inert construction
waste at public fill reception facilities (“PFRF”) 10 . We will encourage the
contractors to maximise the use of recycled or recyclable inert construction waste,
and the use of non-timber formwork to further reduce the generation of
construction waste.

23. At the construction stage, we will require the contractors to submit for
approval a plan setting out the waste management measures, which will include
appropriate mitigation means to avoid, reduce, reuse and recycle inert
construction waste. We will ensure that the day-to-day operations on site comply
with the approved plan. We will require the contractors to separate the inert
portion from non-inert construction waste on site for disposal at appropriate
facilities. We will control the disposal of construction waste through a trip-ticket
system.

24. We estimate that the Advance Works will generate in total about
6 976 600 tonnes 11 of construction waste. Of these, we will reuse about 6 153

10
Public fill reception facilities (PFRF) are specified in Schedule 4 of the Waste Disposal (Charges for
Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap 354N). Disposal of inert construction waste in PFRF
requires a licence issued by the Director of Civil Engineering and Development.
11
The figure is approximate only and could only be confirmed after land resumption/clearance.

7
300 tonnes (about 88%) of inert construction waste on the sites under the Advance
Works and temporarily stockpile about 671 600 tonnes (about 10%) of inert
construction waste for subsequent reuse mainly in the Remaining Phase of the
KTN and FLN NDAs development. We will dispose of the remaining 151 700
tonnes (about 2%) of non-inert construction waste at landfills. The total cost for
disposal of the construction waste at landfill is estimated to be about $30.3 million
for the Advance Works (based on a unit charge rate of $200 per tonne for disposal
at landfills as stipulated in the Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of
Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N)).

TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS

25. We completed a traffic impact assessment, which revealed that the

traffic impact due to planned population intake of the First Phase of the NDAs
development would be reasonably mitigated with commissioning of FLBP(E) and
local junction improvement works.

26. The traffic impact of the First Phase of the NDAs development during
the construction stage will be manageable. Temporary traffic arrangements
(TTAs) will be implemented to facilitate the construction works. We will
establish a Traffic Management Liaison Group (TMLG) comprising
representatives of the CEDD, the Transport Department, the Hong Kong Police
Force and other stakeholders to discuss, scrutinise and review the TTAs proposed
by the contractors with a view to minimising traffic impact arising from the
Advance Works. We will maintain close contact with the TMLG members as
well as District Offices, the relevant District Councils, various public transport
operators and utility undertakers. We will also consult relevant District Councils
prior to the implementation of major TTAs under the Advance Works. In
addition, we will set up a telephone hotline to respond to public enquiries or
complaints.

HERITAGE IMPLICATIONS

27. We have completed a cultural heritage assessment under the EIA for
the NENT NDAs. It concluded that the proposed works would not affect any
heritage site, i.e. all declared monuments, proposed monuments, graded historic
sites/buildings and Government historic sites identified by the Antiquities and
Monuments Office (AMO).

28. However, part of the Site of Archaeological Interest identified by the

AMO at Sheung Shui Wa Shan would be affected by the Advance Works. When

8
the construction details for the proposed works in the concerned site are
formulated, we will require the contractors to conduct an Archaeological Impact
Assessment to determine the need for archaeological follow up actions in the
impacted area before commencement of any construction works according to the
EIA report. For areas with medium archaeological potential identified during the
EIA study which would be affected by the Advance Works, but surveys could not
be conducted before land resumption, we will also conduct the assessment before
commencement of any construction works, and recommend mitigation measures
if necessary, according to the EIA report.

29. We will also comply with the recommendations of the EIA report to
carry out a baseline condition survey and baseline vibration impact assessment for
identified built heritage adjacent to the works sites before commencement of the
works and to evaluate if construction vibration monitoring and structural
strengthening measures are required during construction to safeguard compliance
with the vibration standard stated in the EIA report.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

30. We upgraded 7747CL to Category B in September 2010.

31. On 27 June 2014, the FC approved upgrading of part of 7747CL to

Category A as 7772CL as “Advance site formation and engineering infrastructure
works at Kwu Tung North new development area and Fanling North new
development area – detailed design and site investigation” at an approved project
estimate of $340.8 million in MOD prices for engaging consultants to undertake
the detailed design and site investigation for the Advance Works. We have
substantially completed the detailed design of the Advance Works.

32. Of the 8 647 trees within the boundary of the Advance Works, 1 838
trees will be preserved, whereas 6 809 trees will be affected, including 6 644 trees
to be felled and 165 trees to be transplanted. Among the above, 10 important
trees 12 will be affected and the proposed treatments to these important trees are at

12
“Important trees” refers to trees in the Register of Old and Valuable Trees, or any other trees that
meet one or more of the following criteria –
(a) trees of 100 years old or above;
(b) trees of cultural, historical or memorable significance e.g. Fung Shui tree, tree as landmark of
monastery or heritage monument, and trees in memory of an important person or event;
(c) trees of precious or rare species;
(d) trees of outstanding form (taking account of overall tree sizes, shape and any special features)
e.g. trees with curtain like aerial roots, trees growing in unusual habitat; or
(e) trees with trunk diameter equal to or exceeding 1.0 meter (m) (measured at 1.3 m above
ground level), or with height/canopy spread equal to or exceeding 25 m.

9
Annex 7 to this Enclosure. We will incorporate planting proposals as part of the
Advance Works, including about 1 452 trees, 5 470 whips and 140 200 shrubs as
compensatory planting 13.

Development Bureau
Civil Engineering and Development Department
January 2019

13
The figures are approximate only and could only be confirmed after land resumption/clearance.

10
 ªþ¥ó1 ªþ¿ý1 (2±i¹ ANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 1 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
Chuk
¦Ë
Yuen

WONG MAU HANG

SHAN
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Leachate
¬û

R
Treatment Works

E
V
KONG YIU

I
R
¹Ï

N
»ÉÆ

E
°ï¶

H
TUNG LO

NZ
Landfill
ĵ HANG

E
H
Police Post
ªF- ©ù

S
¸û¼

ÀÀij¨R´Z
TUNG FUNG NGONG TONG
Kaw Liu AU
Village
¦
¤ì´ò ² `
Muk Wu
ĵ Às§
°t¤ ĵ
Police Post LUNG MEI
©â¤ Ser Res PoliceNga Yiu
Pumping
Post
¥´¹ª ²À TENG
S (P
Station
Ta Kwu Kan
Ling Tau Wai GA
Village
N
GE
IN R)
¥ËŽ ¥Û¹
¤ì IVE
R G YUENR Nga Yiu Ha SHEK TSAI HA
VE

LEGEND:
Muk Wu
RI
¦Ñ¹
ĵ
Police
¤åÀ LO SHUE LING
¥´¹

¥
Post MAN KAM TO
TA KWU LING ¤ô¤

-
¶í SHUI NGAU TSO

-
Tong Fong
»ñ° ¥Û
¥Ý®
Fung Wong Wu SHEK O Wo Keng Shan
¶g¥ ĵ
Police Post ©W
Chow Tin Tsuen

PROPOSED FLUSHING183
WATER
Ping Yeung
«n §õ ¤ô
NAM HANG ·s« T Lei Uk
Ä®´ San Uk Ling ¸ Shui Hau
HOO HOK WAI Ò
¶êÀ ¹
ä

A
¤j¨ YUEN LENG
Ã

R
CHAI ĵ

I
TA SHA LOK ª@¥

V
Police

E
¤

P
Sing Ping Village

R
Post

I
¥j¬}¥_·sµ

GN

NG
AG
E
S
Sandy Ridge Cemetery
¨FÀ-

HC
(P

E
E

±
G

I
D

NG
F I Cheung Shan Monastery
R

SERVICE RESERVOIR
¨D Y O
RA

YUE
D
ÂùÉÓ

D
±o¤ ù N

A
®Æ LECKY PASS A

N
O
Tak Yuet Lau Lo Wu

R
Liu Pok S
®£À

Lo
( SEUNG MA ¥´¹ªÀ

ù

I
LEI YUE ) ĵ ¬û¥

VE
Ta Kwu Ling Farm

O
KONG NGA PO HUNG LUNG

T
Police

R)
Wu
ĵ Post HANG

©
¤j®

± ï

AM
Police
ù

W
Tai Po Tin ªø

K
Post
¥

à
CHEUNG SHAN
LO WU ¤ô¬

N
-

MA
¨F ©W
¿ß Shui Lau Hang
ª

BOUNDARY OF KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

Sha Ling STAG HILL

e
Ping Che
¥Û

in
ĵ

RIVE

el
Police Post SHEK MA
©Wà|

p
«H¸q

Pi
¤j¥ el Ping Che
Lutheran ¤ô unn

ï
New Village

IN
¿é T

É
New Village CREST HILL
r °t¤

D(U

¾
¤û¨ ( TAI SHEK MO )
te

NG
Wa
Ser Res ¤W¤s °t¤

S
HORN HILL ĵ Ser Res
Police ¹v Sheung Shan

(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ
( NGAU KOK SHAN )

TUN
Post ®à (ªø¨j Kai Wat

183
Firing Range ±Òª
ÅÂÀ ¤U¤s ¥ÕÅ
TABLE HILL Kai Fong ¾î¤s¸

GR
¸¨°¨¬wª Tse Koo °¨¯óà ( CHEUNG PO TAU ) Ha Shan PAK HOK
Garden Wang Shan Keuk

IVE
§ü Kai Wat SHAN
LOK MA CHAU LOOP Hang Ma Tso Lung
µÚ San Tsuen
Ngam Pin CHAM SHAN ¤j¬

R)
San Tsuen
ù´ò¤À TAI HOM TUK
°¨¯ Lo Wu Classification Range
±ÆÀ ¬õ¾ô
MA ryTSO LUNG
©W VERNON PASS
Âo¤ Hung Kiu
in
e
da ( PAI TAU LO ) l¥Õ¥Ð
PING HANG Water Treatment San Tsuen pe
un ªê¦a Pi Pak Tin
o Works
New Village
B ù´òà ¾É À-

ÀÀij¤uµ{
Ma Mei Ha
Lo Wu Leng Tsai
Correctional Institution AN ¹p¤

®
¤jà a FU
Q

· s
e ¹v
TEI µØ SH CAT HILL ¾î ¨
TAI LAW HAU Ar Firing AU ROAD ¾É
WA SHAN ¿é ª G
WANG LENG Y
Range
ne
¤ô N À
Pipeli ¤W¤ô U F

¸¨°

²
¤UÆ »ñ± ·s³ò/¤jÀ ¤Õ
Ha Wan
¸¨° FUNG KONG SHAN
Sheung Shui Water TS
Tunnel
Hung Leng
¨ ²À
ed Wa Shan San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range Kan Tau Tsuen

(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 5

¸¨° Tsuen LOK MA CHAU os ªQ
l
Ma Chau C Tsung Yuen µR¤û
Lok °¨À RI
¸¨° ¤W °ª® VE
HIGH HILL LAMB HILL -x¦ R
ÅK ªe ( MA TAU LENG ) §d« JHELUM
Lok Ma r Kwan Tei North Ko Po North

RO A D
AD ¤

¥Û¤
e Tit Hang Ng Uk Tsuen ¤¦¦Ë§
Chau
ti
RO ¦
Ãä ¤ Tan Chuk Hang

PROPOSED WORKS BOUNDARY

n
¹Ò o K Lo Wai
¸T r ¤å» ¤U¥ KO
F

G
·à¦
¤W

H EU N
Ha Pak Tsuen U

LOK MA CHAU
Man Kok
TA °ª®

RI
ÁA± »ñ ªe¤ Village DUKES HILL

VE
Ho Sheung ¦Ã¤ô³ ¤¤¤ KO PO SHAN ( SZE TEI SHAN )
Lookout Fung Kong ¤W¥

R
Sewage Treatment Chung LAU
A
Heung SHEUNG SHUI °ª

S
¤UÆWº® Sheung SH

U
Works Sum ¤p§|

T
ĵ G

L(S
ªù¤ TsuenPak ¤Ñ¥- Ko Po

HS
Ha Wan Fisherman UN ³ò¤ Siu Hang -x ·s¶
¤p§

JH
Police E Tsuen

UI
Post San Tsuen
Mun Hau

EK
ªF Tin Ping Shan San Tsuen -x San Tong Po

°¨¯
SH Wai Loi Siu Hang Kwan Tei
¤j¤
Tsuen

TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

Üñ Barracks

SHEU
Tung Fong Tsuen Tsuen
O Tai Yuen Tsuen
¤TÄ ¼ï«

LO
H
³@¤ »AÄR

EH
KW AN
NG
Pun Uk Tsuen LONG VALLEY IV
R ER) Tsuen

K
¶í

UN G
SAM PO SHUE Po Sheung Tsui Lai

NG TUNG

¸ ¨
EAST RAIL LINE Tong Kok Tsuen Garden
¿³¤

MA
Hing Yan TUNGRIVER) ÂÑÀ
± (NG Kan Lung ªù T
Tsuen «³» EI ÁA±

° ¨
ï DU
S Gate Tower
°¨®Æ¤ R

CH
Woodland ® IN
Tsuen I Lookout Hok Tau Pai
¬w ¥Û¥ ·s VE

OR
Ma Liu Shui

AU
ªa Crest ER
V ªê¦
RI

AD
Chau Tau ¥Û¥JÀ Shek Tsai San Tsuen R
Å San Wai

JO
¥Õ¥ Sw P Fu Tei Pai
ªF Dills Corner Leng

C
RO
Pak Shek Au ¥Û´ò

KE
Garden ¥Û´ ·s« ¤j

AD

Y
Shek Wu

SA
¥j

ÀÀij¹D¸ô¤uµ{ (¥]¬A¦X¾Aªº¾
SHEK WU HUI San Tsuen
San Uk Tai Wo ¤jÀ

N
¤W
Kwu Tung ªQ¬

CL
¯Q¾~

- ¦ª
Tsuen
¸ ¿P Tsung Pak Long ¾ ÀsÅ ¬Ó¦ TAI LENG PEI

UB
SH
Wu Nga HO
À¤
9 ¬Ó© K
Yin Kong É QUEEN'S HILL

A
¯ Lok Yeung

M
¼Ú·N «È® Pi ¤Ñ¥ Noble Hill LUNG YEUK TAU

R
¥Ð FANLIN

O
·s G p Tin Ping °¨«

R
Europa Garden Hak Ka Wai e

AD
HIGHWA ¤

O
ªFÂ li

D
Y Estate

A
¥¬¸ W Ma Shi Po

OA
KWU

°
n ÆF¤

D
¤¯¹ Tung Chan TUN ¤jÀ e S ¥Ã¹

R
G R ±m»
·s OAD h

¨
Shau Wai eu ¤j· Ling Shan ºa½÷ ºñ±
Yan Wai 9 Tai TauChoi Po ºaºÖ Wing Ning

MA TSO LUNG
n Town Hall

·
ÅbÃ
Tsuen ¥¬¦ ¬ ¤Å

N
SAN TIN Leng g Wing FaiBelair Monte
Wing Fok
¤Ñ Court Wai

UE
¦wÀ ¥Ã¥ °t¤ « ¤W¤ô ¹
Centre Centre
«Ò® Po Kat Tsai Hok Tau Wai
C Sh Sheung Shui

TS
Wing Ping Valais ÆF ¥Ã¹
On Lung Tsuen Ser Res ª÷ ¤ ±m¶ ui Centre Regentville ªF»

SHEUNG SHUI
Tsuen ®üÁp
Kam Tsin ½ Choi Yuen ¦°®
Estate ±½º LING HILL
±s® ERWing Ning
Åï®p¤ ¹ÅÄR Tung Kok

N
¤j¤ CASTLE P
EAK Union Plaza IV Tsuen ¬y¤

TI
Casas Domingo Grand R Wai
Man Lun Fung Yuk Po So
Court Kwun Po

WAT
Tai Fu Tai Lau Shui Heung
¿»¥ Regentville

PROPOSED ROAD WORKS

Ancestral Hall Mansion R
O ªù ³ÂÓ
A

AN
Fan Tin D ¥_°Ï ¯»À- Entrance
±sªL Áp© Ma Wat

S
·sÀ Tsuen ÄQÅ ³ North District Fanling Garden Tower
Tsuen
San Lung ù The Royal Oaks Park LUEN WO HUI ³ÂÓ

MA
HADDEN HILL ÁA±
Tsuen  ¤Ó¥ ¯¨°
( KI LUN SHAN )
¤û Tai Ping
Ma Wat Wai
Tsz Tong
Lookout
ÄQÅ ¯»À ¯»À
«CÀ NGAU TEI Estate ¦w¼ ¦Ñ Tsuen
Ki Lun ¥j¬} ¥_°Ï Fanling Wai Fan Leng On Lok Tsuen Lo Wai
Tsing Lung
AD
Tsuen
KWU TUNG North District Lau ¬y¤
RO Tsuen Hospital §d« ±RÁ
RESERVOIR
Äéµ@

A
AK Ng Uk Tsuen ª Shung Him
Hop Shing PE
Wai Âù³½ªe¶

Â
À
Tong LAU SHUI HEUNG
LE «C Beas River Country Club ±s¬

³
(WITH APPROPRIATE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS)

R)
ST

»
F ªa IRRIGATION RESERVOIR
CA ¤ Royal Green AN
s

VE
¿é

¯
§|ÀY LI
Sw P
¯» ¤ô

RI
³À§ Hang Tau ¹Å² N

YUE
²Mª G
¸OÀY Ka Shing ²»µ
Luk Mei
Tsuen
Tai Po
Ching Ho Âû
Estate
¸U» Court Cheung Wah FANLING
Y Pei Tau Kai Leng HI
WA Belair Villa ¯ Estate

G
GH °ªº¸¤ Ling Kok »

D
HI GH

N
E
U
N ¹Åº

A
TI ¦Ì®H F

H
WA
ÄQÅï R a

S
¥Û´ O

(S
Ka Fuk nl SHEK AU SHAN

BEA
Mai Po Lung Y
Shek Wu Wai ´^À SADDLE PASS M -Ü« Estate ing ¶í
Tsuen »ZÀ

K
A CHONG TSIN
Pang Loon Tei ( KI LUN SHAN AU )
Tong Hang

ER
el
LENG PO LENG
¯»À-

¥j¬}¥_·
¤s¤õÁ

N
AU ¶À±

nn

FA
½¼¤ »Z ¯ Fanling Fire Lookout

R
Centre WONG KONG

Tu
Ha Kung Tei PO LENG À Às
ºÖ¥ ¤þ ½¹½ SHAN
¤ LUNG SHAN
¦Ã¤ô³ §| FUK TSUEN SHAN Ping Kong ½¹½º °t¤
¹v WU TIP
¸

ter
Sewage Hang Tau
¦w ¤û Firing SHAN Wu Tip Shan
Ser Res
Treatment
On Po TARGET VALLEYRange Village

Wa
¥Û´ò³ Works 9
ºÑ´ò EA
Shek Wu Wai
-x Avon Park
Barracks
ST
San Tsuen ¤pê ´º² ²o´ ¶í§|

ÀÀij¦a½L¥-¾ã (¥]¬A
ªY² King Shing Dawning Views R Tong Hang
Siu Hum A
Court
Yan Shing I Tung Chuen
Tsuen L
µ{¨

ô
Court µØ¤
-ð¤ Golf Course

KWU TUNG NORTH

Wah Sum ©M¦X¥

LI
¤
Maple Gardens TSING KEI HANG
Tong Kung Leng ªá³£ Estate ®Ü¥J

NE
Wo Hop Shek

é
Flora Plaza San Tsuen
KAT TSAI SHAN AU

¿
©M¿ ©M¦X

ü ¤
ªø Wo Hing
Wo Hop Shek
¹êÅç

ª
©÷² Tsuen Village
Cheung Lek Experimental

F
Cheong Shing
µØ©

§
Farm Court Wah Ming Estate

Å
ºß° ¹l² ©M¦

RIVER
Yung Shing

NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

¹v ½¬¶ KEI LAK TSAI Court
Firing Lin Tong Mei WO HOP SHEK

PROPOSED SITE FORMATION (WITH APPROPRIATE INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS)

Range ÁA± µe¬
Lookout Wa Mei Shan
¤EÀs§
¸²µ Kau Lung Hang
¤j ¤õ¸
The Vineyard Crematorium Lo Wai
Tai Lung
¾ô
-x ³¯« Kiu Tau
Barracks
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
¿¼ Chan Uk Po
½¬¶í§
¯E
Gallant
TSIU KENG Lin Tongºq½
Mei
Garden
Tsoi Yuen
The Green
¿¼®| ´º¥ ¤EÀs§

AD
¤
¼ Tsiu Keng Tribute Kau Lung Hang ¤EÀs

RO
§¸
¦Ã¤ô³ Âo¤ Lo Wai Garden San Wai
Sewage Treatment CLOUDY HILL
Water Treatment Works ¿¼®| ÁÚº¸
Works ( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
Tsiu Keng Miami Crescent ¤¸

M
«nµ

KA
Yuen Leng
Pang Uk
©M¦X¥ Nam Wa Po
¿¼®| Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
Tsiu Keng

N
A
TA

ne
San Wai

F
ÀÀij¥j¬}¥_°t¤ô®

li
¤û¼

pe
SHU H
Àç

Pi
NGAU TAM MEI Ying Pun

I ANG

A
À
»
¤j

¯
Tai Wo
¿é¤ô ®õ¦ë¦
Water Tai Hang
Tunne ®õ¦ë¯
l Fui Sha Wai
¿é Tai Hang
¤ô Tsz Tong ®õ¦ë¤
Tsuen

PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH SERVICE RESERVOIRS AND ASSOCIATED WATERWORKS

¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN
ÀÀij¥j¬}¥

0
0
PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH SEWAGE PUMPING STATION

1
ÀÀij¦b²{¦³¹D¸ôªº±Æ
PROPOSED DRAINAGE/SEWERAGE/WATERWORKS ON EXISTING ROADS

ÀÀijÂX«Ø¤Î´£¤É¥
ÀÀij-¹¤
PROPOSED EXPANSION AND UPGRADING OF SHEK WU HUI SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS PROPOSED FRESH WATER
SERVICE RESERVOIR

(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ

ªF
(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 5
TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

Å
R
VE
RI

EA
»ñ ªe¤ YU
E

ST
FUNG KONG

G
ÀÀij¥
134 HO SHEUNG HEUNG

RA
N
10

U
0

IL
PROPOSED INTERCHANGE

H
S

L
ÀÀij¥j¬}¥ Üñ

I
N
E
³
PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH LONG VALLEY
¥Õ¥

Âù
SEWAGE PUMPING STATION
PAK SHEK AU
(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ
(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 4 ÀÀijÂX«
TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS) ¥Û´ò¼V¦Ã
PROPOSED EXPANSION AND
UPGRADING OF SHEK WU HUI
SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS

Y
¥j
½( ¦{À KWU TUNG
¿P
«C ¤ AD 16
K RO
9
A YIN KONG
CASTLE PE )
U TAU
A
(CH
¥j¬ KWU TUNG ¯»¤½
ROAD
FANLING HI 9
GH
ÀÀij¸ô¤f WA
Y
PROPOSED JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT

(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ
1
0
0
(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 6
TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCE SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN (KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA)
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0053_KTN_E21\CDNKFNZ0053_KTN.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó1 ªþ¿ý1 (2±i¹ ANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 1 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
¦Ë

ROAD
Chuk Yuen

WONG MAU HANG

SHAN
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Leachate
¬û

R
Treatment Works

E
V
KONG YIU

I
¹Ï

R
N
»ÉÆ

E
°ï¶

H
TUNG LO

NZ
Landfill
ĵ HANG

E
H
Police Post
ªF- ©ù

S
¸û¼ TUNG FUNG NGONG TONG
Kaw Liu AU
Village
¦
¤ì´ò ² `
ĵ Às§

LEGEND:
°t¤ ĵ Muk Wu
Police Post LUNG MEI

ÀY
©â¤ Ser Res PoliceNga Yiu

KOK
Pumping
Post
¥´¹ª ²À TENG
S (P

5
Station
Ta Kwu Kan
Ling Tau Wai GA
Village
N
GE
IN R)
¥ËŽ ¥Û¹
¤ì IVE
R G YUENR Nga Yiu Ha SHEK TSAI HA
Muk Wu VE
RI
¦Ñ¹

3
ĵ
Police
¤åÀ LO SHUE LING
¥´¹

¥
Post MAN KAM TO
TA KWU LING ¤ô¤

-
1
¶í SHUI NGAU TSO

-
Tong Fong
»ñ° ¥Û
¥Ý®
Fung Wong Wu SHEK O Wo Keng Shan
¶g¥ ĵ
Police Post ©W
Chow Tin Tsuen

¯»À-¥_·sµ
Ping Yeung
«n §õ ¤ô
NAM HANG ·s« T Lei Uk
Ä®´ San Uk Ling ¸ Shui Hau

¯»À-¥_·
HOO HOK WAI Ò
¶êÀ ¹
ä

A
TAU
¤j¨ YUEN LENG
Ã

RI
CHAI ĵ
TA SHA LOK ª@¥

VE
Police

¨F

P
Sing Ping Village

R
Post

IN
GN
AG

G
ES
Sandy Ridge Cemetery
¨FÀ-

HC
(P

E
E

BOUNDARY OF FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

G

I
D

NG
F I Cheung Shan Monastery

FANLING NORTH
R
¨D Y O
RA

YUE
D
ÂùÉÓ

AD
±o¤ ù N
®Æ LECKY PASS A

N
RO
Tak Yuet Lau Lo Wu

R
Liu Pok S
®£À

Lo
( SEUNG MA ¥´¹ªÀ

ù

I
LEI YUE ) ĵ ¬û¥

V
Ta Kwu Ling Farm

TO

ER
Police KONG NGA PO HUNG LUNG

Wu

)
ĵ Post HANG

©
¤j®

± ï

M
Police
ù

KA
ªø

W
Post Tai Po Tin
¥

à
CHEUNG SHAN

NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

LO WU ¤ô¬

N
-

MA
¿ß

SHA
¨F ª ©W Shui Lau Hang
Sha Ling STAG HILL

ne
Ping Che
ĵ ¥Û

RI

i
l
Police Post SHEK MA

VE

pe
©Wà|
«H¸q

Pi
ÀÀij¤uµ{
¤j¥ el Ping Che
Lutheran ¤ô unn New Village

IND
¿é T

É
New Village CREST HILL
r °t¤

(N

¾
¤û¨ ( TAI SHEK MO )
te

US
Wa
Ser Res ¤W¤s °t¤

G
HORN HILL ĵ Ser Res
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Police ¹v Sheung Shan

TU
Post ®à (ªø¨j Firing Range Kai Wat ±Òª
¤U¤s ¥ÕÅ

NG
ÅÂÀ TABLE HILL Kai Fong ¾î¤s¸
¸¨°¨¬wª Ha Shan PAK HOK

RIV
Tse Koo °¨¯óà ( CHEUNG PO TAU )
SHAN Garden Wang Shan Keuk
LOK MA CHAU LOOP Hang Ma Tso Lung
µÚ §ü Kai Wat
San Tsuen

ÀÀij¯»À-
¤j¬

ER
Ngam Pin CHAM SHAN
San Tsuen
ù´ò¤À

)
TAI HOM TUK
°¨¯

PROPOSED WORKS BOUNDARY

Lo Wu Classification Range
±ÆÀ ¬õ¾ô
MA ryTSO LUNG
©W a VERNON PASS
Âo¤ Hung Kiu
in
e
d ( PAI TAU LO ) l¥Õ¥Ð
PING HANG n Water Treatment San Tsuen pe
u ªê¦a Pi Pak Tin
o Works
New Village
B ù´òà ¾É À- Ma Mei Ha
Lo Wu Leng Tsai
Correctional Institution
a FU
AN ¹p¤
¤jà Q

· s
e ¹v
µØ SH CAT HILL ¾î ¨
r TEI
TAI LAW HAU A Firing AU ROAD ¾É
WA SHAN ¿é G ª WANG LENG Y
Range
ne
¤ô À
Pipeli ¤W¤ô UN F

²
¤UÆ »ñ± ·s³ò/¤jÀ ¤Õ
¸¨° Sheung Shui Water TS
Tunnel ¨ ²À

ÀÀij-«¸m¦w¼
d

¸¨°
Ha Wan FUNG KONG SHAN Hung Leng
e Wa Shan San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range Kan Tau Tsuen
¸¨° Tsuen LOK MA CHAU s
o ªQ

PROPOSED FANLING BYPASS

0

4
l
Ma Chau C Tsung Yuen µR¤û
Lok
W °¨À RI
¸¨° ¤ °ª® VE
HIGH HILL LAMB HILL -x¦ R

ÀÀij¹D¸ô¤uµ{ (¥]¬A¦X¾Aªº¾
e

0
ÅK ª ( MA TAU LENG ) §d« JHELUM
Lok Ma r Kwan Tei North Ko Po North D

ROAD
¤

6
A

¥ Û¤
e Tit Hang Ng Uk Tsuen ¤¦¦Ë§
Chau
t
i RO ¦

1 Ãä n ¤ Tan Chuk Hang

¹Ò o K Lo Wai
¸T r ¤å» ¤U¥ KO

1
F

H EU NG
·à¦
Ha
Man Kok Pak Tsuen
¤W TA
U °ª®

RIVE
ªe¤

LOK MA CHAU
ÁA± »ñ Village DUKES HILL
Ho Sheung ¦Ã¤ô³ ¤¤¤ KO PO SHAN ( SZE TEI SHAN )
Lookout Fung Kong ¤W¥

R
Sewage Treatment Chung LAU
A
Heung SHEUNG SHUI °ª

S
¤UÆWº® Sheung SH

U
Works Sum ¤p§|

T
ĵ

L(
ªù¤ TsuenPak Ko Po

EASTERN SECTION
NG
¤Ñ¥-

HS
ESHE
Ha Wan Fisherman ³ò¤ Siu Hang -x ·s¶
¤p§

J
Police EU Tsuen

UI
Post San Tsuen
Mun Hau
Tin Ping Shan San Tsuen -x

PROPOSED ROAD WORKS (WITH APPROPRIATE NOISE

ªF SH San Tong Po

K
Wai Loi ¤j¤
Tsuen Siu Hang Kwan Tei

PROPOSED REPROVISIONING OF
Üñ Barracks

SH
Tung Fong Tsuen Tsuen
Tai Yuen Tsuen
¤TÄ ¼ï«

EU
LOK
HO
³@¤ »AÄR

EH
KW AN
NG
Pun Uk Tsuen ¶í LONG VALLEY IV
R ER) Tsuen

UN G
SAM PO SHUE Po Sheung Tsui Lai

¸ ¨
EAST RAIL LINE Tong Kok Tsuen Garden
¿³¤

MA
Hing Yan TUNGRIVER) ÂÑÀ
± (NG Kan Lung ªù TE
Tsuen «³» ÁA±

° ¨
ï DU
S Gate Tower IRI
°¨®Æ¤

CHA
Woodland ® IN
Tsuen Lookout Hok Tau Pai
¬w ¥Û¥ ·s VE

OR
Crest ER
Ma Liu Shui
ªa RI
V ªê¦

AD
U
Chau Tau ¥Û¥JÀ Shek Tsai R

MITIGATION MEASURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS)

Å San Wai San Tsuen

J
¥Õ¥ Sw P

O
ªF Dills Corner Leng Fu Tei Pai

C
¤W

ROA
Pak Shek Au ¥Û´ò

K
Garden ¥Û´ ¤j

EY
·s«
Shek Wu

S
¥j

D
A
SHEK WU HUI San Uk ¤jÀ

ON LOK MUN STREET PLAYGROUND

San Tsuen Tai Wo

N
Kwu Tung ªQ¬

C
¯Q¾~

- ¦ª
Tsuen
ÀsÅ ¬Ó¦ TAI LENG PEI

LU
¸ ¿P Tsung Pak Long ¾

SH
Wu Nga HO
À¤
9

B
¬Ó© K

(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ
Yin Kong É QUEEN'S HILL

A
¯ Lok Yeung

M
¼Ú·N «È® Pi ¤Ñ¥ Noble Hill LUNG YEUK TAU

R
¥Ð FANLIN

OA
·s G pe Tin Ping °¨«

RO
Europa Garden HIGHWA Hak Ka Wai
ªFÂ l ¤

AD
Y

D
Estate

AD
¥¬¸ KWU
in W ÆF¤
Ma Shi Po

°
¤jÀ

O
¤¯¹ Tung Chan TUN e Sh ¥Ã¹

R
G R ±m»
·s OAD

¨
Shau Wai e ¤j· Ling Shan ºa½÷ ºñ±
Yan Wai 9 Tai TauChoi Po u Town Hall ºaºÖ Wing Ning

·
ÅbÃ
¬ ¤Å
n Tsuen ¥¬¦

N
SAN TIN Leng g Wing FaiBelair Monte
Wing Fok
¤Ñ Court Wai

UE
¦wÀ ¥Ã¥ °t¤ « ¤W¤ô ¹

SHEUNG SHUI
Centre Centre
«Ò® Po Kat Tsai Hok Tau Wai
C Sh Sheung Shui

S
Wing Ping Valais ÆF ¥Ã¹
On Lung Tsuen Ser Res ª÷

T
Tsuen ¤ ±m¶ ui Centre Regentville ªF»
½ Choi Yuen ¦°®
Estate LING HILL ®üÁp ERWing Ning
Åï®p¤ ¹ÅÄR Kam Tsin ±½º ±s® V Tung Kok

N
¤j¤ CASTLE P
EA Union Plaza Tsuen ¬y¤

TI
Casas Domingo K Grand RI Wai
Man Lun Fung Yuk Po So
Court Kwun Po

ÀÀij¦a½L¥-¾ã (¥]¬A

WAT
Tai Fu Tai Lau Shui Heung
¿»¥ R Regentville
Ancestral Hall Mansion OA ªù ³ÂÓ

AN
Fan Tin D ¥_°Ï ¯»À- Entrance
±sªL Áp© Ma Wat

S
·sÀ Tsuen ÄQÅ ³ North District Fanling Garden Tower
Tsuen

(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ
San Lung ù The Royal Oaks Park LUEN WO HUI ³ÂÓ

MA
HADDEN HILL ÁA±
Tsuen  ¤Ó¥ ¯¨°
¤û Ma Wat Wai

(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 2

( KI LUN SHAN ) Lookout
Tai Ping Tsz Tong
ÄQÅ ¯»À ¯»À
NGAU TEI Estate ¦w¼ ¦Ñ Tsuen
«CÀ Ki Lun ¥j¬} ¥_°Ï Fanling Wai Fan Leng On Lok Tsuen Lo Wai
Tsing Lung
AD
Tsuen
KWU TUNG North District Lau ¬y¤
RO Tsuen Hospital §d« ±RÁ
RESERVOIR
Äéµ@

A
AK Ng Uk Tsuen ª Shung Him
Hop Shing PE
Wai Âù³½ªe¶

Â
À
LAU SHUI HEUNG

PROPOSED SITE FORMATION

LE «C Beas River Country Club Tong
±s¬

³
R)
ST

»
F ªa IRRIGATION RESERVOIR
CA ¤s Royal Green A

VE
¿é

¯
§|ÀY N
LI
Sw P
¯» ¤ô

RI
³À§ Hang Tau ¹Å² NG

YUE
²Mª
¸OÀY Ka Shing ²»µ
Luk Mei Tai Po
Ching Ho Âû
Estate
¸U» Court Cheung Wah FANLING

TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

Y Tsuen Pei Tau Kai Leng H
WA Belair Villa I ¯ Estate

G
GH °ªº¸¤ Ling Kok »

D
HI GH

N
E
U
N ¹Åº

(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 3

A
TI ¦Ì®H Fa

H
W
ÄQÅï R

R BEAS
¥Û´ O

S
Ka Fuk A nl SHEK AU SHAN

(
Y

(WITH APPROPRIATE INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS)

Mai Po Lung
Shek Wu Wai ´^À SADDLE PASS M -Ü« Estate in
g ¶í
Tsuen »ZÀ

K
( KI LUN SHAN AU ) A CHONG TSIN
Pang Loon Tei
Tong Hang

el
LENG PO LENG

VE
¯»À- ¤s¤õÁ

N
AU ¶À±

Tunn

RI

FA
½¼¤ »Z ¯ Fanling Fire Lookout
Centre WONG KONG
Ha Kung Tei PO LENG À Às
ºÖ¥ ¤þ ½¹½ SHAN
¤ LUNG SHAN
¦Ã¤ô³ §| FUK TSUEN SHAN Ping Kong ½¹½º °t¤
¹v WU TIP
¸

r
Sewage Hang Tau
¦w ¤û SHAN Wu Tip Shan
Ser Res

te
Firing
Treatment
On Po TARGET VALLEYRange Village

Wa
¥Û´ò³ Works 9
ºÑ´ò EA
-x

TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

Shek Wu Wai Avon Park ST
Barracks
San Tsuen ¤pê ´º² ²o´ ¶í§|
ªY² King Shing
Dawning Views R Tong Hang
Siu Hum AI
Yan Court
Shing Tung Chuen
Tsuen L
µ{¨

ô
Court µØ¤
-ð¤ Golf Course Wah Sum ©M¦X¥

L
¤
Maple Gardens TSING KEI HANG

IN
Tong Kung Leng

ÀÀij-«¸m¥_°ÏÁ{®
Estate ®Ü¥J
ªá³£ Wo Hop Shek

E
Flora Plaza San Tsuen
KAT TSAI SHAN AU

¿
©M¿ ©M¦X

ü ¤
ªø Wo Hing
Wo Hop Shek
¹êÅç

ª
©÷² Tsuen Village
Cheung Lek Experimental

F
Cheong Shing
µØ©

§
Farm Court Wah Ming Estate

Å
ºß° ¹l²
Yung Shing
©M¦
¹v ½¬¶ KEI LAK TSAI Court
Firing Lin Tong Mei WO HOP SHEK
Range ÁA± µe¬
Lookout Wa Mei Shan
¤EÀs§

PROPOSED REPROVISIONING OF NORTH DISTRICT

¸²µ Kau Lung Hang
¤j ¤õ¸
The Vineyard Crematorium Lo Wai
Tai Lung
¾ô
-x ³¯« Kiu Tau
Barracks
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
¿¼ Chan Uk Po
½¬¶í§
¯E
Gallant
TSIU KENG Lin Tongºq½
Mei
Garden
Tsoi Yuen
The Green
¿¼®| ´º¥ ¤EÀs§

AD
¤

TEMPORARY WHOLESALE MARKET FOR AGRICULTRUAL PRODUCTS

¼ Tsiu Keng Tribute Kau Lung Hang ¤EÀs

RO
§¸
¦Ã¤ô³ Âo¤ Lo Wai Garden San Wai
Sewage Treatment CLOUDY HILL
Water Treatment Works ¿¼®| ÁÚº¸
Works ( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
Tsiu Keng Miami Crescent ¤¸

M
«nµ

KA
Yuen Leng
Pang Uk
©M¦X¥ Nam Wa Po
¿¼®| Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
Tsiu Keng

N
FA
TA
ÀsÅ

ne
San Wai

li
¤û¼

pe
SHU H
Àç

Pi
NGAU TAM MEI Ying Pun

I ANG

A
À
ÀÀij¯»À-¥

»
¤j

¯
Tai Wo
¿é¤ô ®õ¦ë¦
Water Tai Hang
Tunne ®õ¦ë¯
l Fui Sha Wai
¿é Tai Hang
¤ô Tsz Tong ®õ¦ë¤
Tsuen

PROPOSED FANLING NORTH SEWAGE PUMPING STATION LUNG YEUK TAU

ÀÀij-«¸m¦w¼
¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN
PROPOSED REPROVISIONING OF ON LOK MUN STREET PLAYGROUND

0
6
ÀÀijÂX«Ø¤Î´£¤É¥

3
PROPOSED EXPANSION AND UPGRADING OF ÀÀij-«¸m¥_°ÏÁ{®
SHEK WU HUI SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS
PROPOSED REPROVISIONING OF
NG NORTH DISTRICT TEMPORARY WHOLESALE
TU
NG MARKET FOR AGRICULTRUAL PRODUCTS
RI
VE (¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ
R
±ï (PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 3
®
¯» TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

s
e
R
e ¤
FANLING

S t
r
°
¤W
SHEUNG SHUI ÀÀij¯»À-¥
PROPOSED FANLING NORTH ¼Ö·
SEWAGE PUMPING STATION LOK YIP ROAD
(¸Ô±¡½Ð°Ñ¾\ªþ °¨·
C
KEY LUB ROAD
(PLEASE REFER TO ANNEX 4 JOC
TO ENCLOSURE 1 FOR DETAILS)

¥Û´ AY -
À HW
SHEK WU HUI » HI
G
¯

9
G
¯»À NL
IN
A
¤W¤ F
Âù³

ION
FANLING STAT
TATION
SHEUNG SHUI S
SHEU

ÀÀijÂX«
¥Û´ò¼V¦Ã
NG YUE RI

PROPOSED EXPANSION AND

2
UPGRADING OF SHEK WU HUI

5
SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS
9
VE

6
1
R

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCE SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN (FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA)
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0054_FLN_E21\CDNKFNZ0054_FLN.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 es
R
g er
S
an g
H an

To
ng
To
ng
H
ªþ¥ó1 ª ANNEX 2 TO ENCLOSURE 1

1
域 i
ne
都 a
碼 om
數 erD K 村
yb 0 東 ng
C 3 20 Tu
A 21 坑 g
榮 塘 an n
頌
居 ¯»À-¶ g
H ue
n Ch
K To
«n¦æ
[

ne
i
麻 lL
ai
笏 tR
河 s
Ea
JO
C
K
E

氣
Y

煤 站
C

壓
L
U

調 \ 7A 大 窩
1
B

東 支
! 路
R
O

¯»À- FANLI
A

TA
D

B
NG I
W
馬 9
b
7
¡ CERD WEST
大窩 西
支 路
HI O
會
道 TAIWO SERVI GH

S
E
K WA

R
V
IC
7
¡
C Y E
R
通 D
運 on
nt E
Ve
路

A
村

S
新

T
和

k
石 he
百

S n
合 op ue
¯»À-¶ J N
和 H
o nT
W a
s
K
¥_¦æ6 居 l
la
S
D

謙 Vi
RO A

明 ia
al F )
R
eg )
林
滙 園 ÀÀij¯»À-Â
NG

7 花
HI

合 he
k石
花
園 PROPOSED FANLING BYPASS EASTERN SECTION
WO

嶺
S 念
粉 立 和 op ge 紀
H l
官 o i la
W V

D
A
灰
O
靈 所 R
置
村 安
U

興
A
路

和
¯»À-
興

IU
K

¥-- LAYOUT PLAN

和

FANLING HIGHWAY

ÀÀij-«©w¨«½u«
PROPOSED REALIGNED TAI WO SERVICE ROAD EAST

ÀÀij-«©w¨«½u«
PROPOSED REALIGNED TAI WO SERVICE ROAD WEST

ÀÀij§ï«Ø²{¦
PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF HO KA YUEN FOOTBRIDGE

ÀÀij-«¸m¤
PROPOSED REPROVISION OF BUS-BUS INTERCHANGE

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã©M°ò¦³]¬
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCED SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN AND ARTISTIC IMPRESSION OF THE PROPOSED FANLING BYPASS EASTERN SECTION CONNECTING FANLING HIGHWAY
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0086_E23\CDNKFNZ0086.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 EH 101 10.0 10A
ªþ¥ó1 ª ANNEX 3 TO ENCLOSURE 1

37
9.0 H 38 TS
A
A
L 25A L

39-3

138
6 PO 8-10 H R
2 HE

36
R

80
E

9A
H
H W
R TS
R
H
10.4 R
E A 10.4

25
TS 7.6 A
R 8.8

61
H
W H A
LH 32

7A
A
TS E CUL L
7 HH H 10.4
3 A L
W 37 L TS

24
H 10.4 A

¹Ï
H H

7
A
H
L 33
HE E 40 H 31 TS k
TS c TS
35 A 9.8 a
6 r
H E 5 L T
R W E TS 10.6 g
L
H E
t TS
H
i
n
R R H H H H A
l H TS
H E H L c
9.4 A 10.4 TS LH E L E y
36 E E H C E
10.2 H

5C
A H E
EH H H TS
段

36B
R H W A EH H
H TS H
FP TS 頭 L

25
E TS TS H

10
R

B
E
H SHR 躍 徑 E

2A
10.1 TS 10.1 車 H
E
A 單 11.0

龍
PO 9.7 A
H E TS A
W H H A
TS TS

　
10.4
TS

LEGEND:
H 56 L H
R 55 H
A

－
L 道路 H L
R

TS
H
TS 10.2 9.8 A TS
63

　
E R

43B
A A 57 H H
H W H 27

路
10.1

P
Ro E 10.7
A R ad H TS

公
E A
L L
5 H
R 9B H H TS
H 62 TS

角
L H

3
E H 5
FP H TS 7 E
L
E L 13.1 E

頭
R H H A
H TS
H H R

沙
ÀÀij¤uµ{
H
HE
L 61
H R
H E H L
W E TS 10.4
L H
ET R H 11.0 A

ÀÀij-«¸m¦w¼
H H 10.4
H
10.2 A
R L A

19
A
B E H
W 46
HW H
FP L L
R 9.7 A 103 A 10.4 H 10.0
HL P L
5C 61
4 10.3 A H
9.8 VO TS
A
H

46
E A 10.7
59C EH L H R 60 H
R H
E TS 新屋村休憩處 H L A

H HW R 10.5 H
R H A 10.4

PROPOSED WORKS BOUNDARY

L 10.1 A E
50

San Uk Tsuen G
H SU
L
A
Sitting-out Area I
WA
L A 10.6 N E H
路 ROA

PROPOSED REPROVISIONING
H 10.4 雲 D
TS R P 萃
A
H TS
6A R
10.1 0
6B 06-1 W 10.5 TS
EH TS A 10 1
A
H TS
R
L L H
H E 68 10.4 TS
R L H
H H A
H
E L H L
E 10.2
P 10.4
H L L

69
H TS

d
H A A

a
FP
5 R H TS

o
1E H

R
TS R
E E TS A 10.7

OF ON LOK MUN STREET

TS H R
H L
R 12.1
57 W E H A H
A L H EH
H L
10.1 10.7A
R
TS

路
A

ÀÀij¹D¸
47 E
W H L

道
10.0 H 10.3A A 11.5 H L
H TS
A L H H H
10.4 A
H 10.1
10.5 TS L 11.6 TS
L A
H
A A
8.9 H R
H 10.0
R A L
W W E H L A 10.3
R H A
F

斜
H P L

PLAYGROUND
H E
E

路
FP H H L

FP
R H
8.8 A
51C

R
L
龍躍頭

a
H

m
L E

(¥]¬A¦X¾Aªº¾¸-µ½w´

p
10.1 L H L 10.2 TS H
H H 10.7
A 49 A
A
51B

B-D TS 1
2 TS H L LUNG YEUK TAU TS H
H
H

48 47 L L
H H A 9.2
57 9.9 E TS L H
C EH E TS
TS A H
H
H TS
W FP R H EH H H

13
H 10.1A
H TS
R H E H
H FP E HE
W L L H

k
10.0 TS

c
A
10.2

a
TS

r
A
R
A

9
51

LH

13
10.0

g
n
H

i
CUL A

l
PROPOSED ROAD WORKS
L L 9.8

c
TS

y
H HE
FP

C
E A

ET H TS

1
E H
TS H
永寧軒

13
TS
L H H
L 11.4
71 浩景軒 9.9
H
H 11.7A 馬適 L H A
A
E
HE
L
H
11.9 路 12.7 8.6
H 71
13
7
H A L HL A A A TS

12
H L H

12
H

0
2
E TS

3
13
H H
L L 72 HL TS

徑
L

11
H L

ÀÀij-ì§}-«

麻
EH

車
H

3
(WITH APPROPRIATE NOISE MITIGATION
70

單
8.8 13 TS

笏
6 E

FB
A H

3
L

河
L HH G

12
13
H H 9.6
11.6

2
11
H A

11
A

5
L L
10.2
D R

9
ck
RO A
a H

5
L ingTr L

13
H cl
Cy HH A
ET
SIK H
H
L 73 永寧花園 10.1
MA
H

MA
單車徑
H 7.9

11
H
R E A

11
0
A
11.3 HL

12
75

6
11.0
M A 10.1

WA
A

1
A A
10.1 HH 73
11.0 A L

MEASURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS)

11
Á{®É¹A²£«
A

T
A
76
H

8
HL 10.0
S

11
RI
HL
A
LH TS
IK

1
77
馬適 路

78
SHR

VE
HL
H H 3 TS
R 11
7

R
H
L 80 9.3
H O H
A

11
HL A HH
10.4

2
rack D H H
yclingT L
A
TS
C EW L
W

81
R 11.3 LH

萃
H
L
11.7 H FP 灝龍居

雲
L TS A

徑 H

路
單車
A

道
H
第七座

1
L

路
H 9.0

PROPOSED INSITU
H
第六座 Block 7 F R TS
A

10.9
P TS
Block 6 A 9.8 83 H
9.7
E ET

11.0 A TS L L
A 11.6 L A H
A
HL H 1A
A 11.8
TR

H H
H

SU
11.6 2 TS

1B
A 9.7

Roa
E 8
榮輝中心

2
11.7

I
ÀÀij-ì§}-«¸m¥_°ÏÁ
I S

E A
G

WA
A

d
H
EW

RCP

N
CUL TS
Wing Fai Centre 11.3
TA

86

RO
ÀÀij¯»À-
A L

5-
L

AD
L H

REPROVISIONING OF

85
H 11

6
H H L H 10.5
H H G
G
O

L L TS 14
A
10.6 L

27

7
0
W

H
第４座 A
H H H H
G
H

8
G 12.1 A 9.4 H
第一座

28
TOWER 4

14
19
第３座 s
A
1 H

9
HL TS TS
8
第五座 綠悠軒 Block 1
H
L
G
A
9.4
19
A H L
H W
L
H 151
TOWER 3 10.9 H H 14
Block 5

29
10.7 2
HE

20
A 9.8

10
A
第２座 LH

41
W
Belair Monte

PROPOSED INSITU REPROVISIONING OF NORTH

A H

-2
G L H
6
龍苑

-4

12
H H

1
H

5
PROPOSED FANLING
H
E

NORTH DISTRICT TEMPORARY

10
TOWER 2 E 10.4
RCP

A
永寧圍

22
10.9 G 12.1 A

30
4

14
10.7 TS
H H H
L G 57
A A
街

1
H
G Wing Ning Wai A
E A
泰

15
H TS 15

31
L
和

L E

30
11.7 H H

-3

16
L HL

A
G H H H

2
A
L H
H
L

33
10.6

DISTRICT TEMPORARY WHOLESALE MARKET

第一座 G -2
4

3
Block 2 TS H
23
A

34
H
萃

Out
H 平 Tower 1 10.1 L
Po 台 雲 16

25
G HL

BYPASS EASTERN
SHR L A
路 5

35
di CUL

fal
WHOLESALE MARKET FOR

17
HL um
11.6 H

49
P

l
8.2

36
TS ET HL 2 16

-5
A
TS 39 6
A A 3
37

0
和 H 11.5

37
H 4
滿

Win
W

H H A TS
E

H
街 11.6 16

g
11.2 11.3 L 8.9 A

SU
9.6

1
T

G A 11.4A TS 2

Nin

I
A A
26.3 H ET
E

FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS

A
A
第二座 H

WA
g
E

H 12.4 TS
斜 H

N
52F
Tower 2 L H H L

Tsu
H 10.5
R

永
CW 路 A

2
L

RO
E
T

L A

寧
en
W

AD
25
H
TS
S

SECTION

村
TS

C
O LH

Si
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
L 9.5 A

16
休

15
I

10.9 L

永
H

tt
籃球場 H 11.9

Ba
51
M TS

1
憩
H 10.5

ing

寧
A

A H

Wi ba
sk
11.4 A L
U Block 3

處
A

籃
H
T

Basketball H 11.6 TS

ng ll
et
N 逸峯
H

-o

16
A
L

球
5
L A

ut

0
Court

Ni Co
24
C

場
S
O

B
10.0 A G

ng ur
A

Ar
12.1A T Green Code 26
W

12.3

ea

36
R TS

16
TS A
座

27
HL
A
E
5

15
五

E s t

t
5
L G 24 B 10.6
k

W
E 16
第

9
H
c

C
W 8.6
o

A
22.3 A
24
l

A 26.3 G
B

6
A L A
l A L H 10.4 A B
i L
a
n H
H A 9.6 25 17
c 北區臨時農產品批發市場 H
e 上

18
L H
P 水

ÀÀij-«¸m¦w¼

14
r CUL H HL
i 宣 11.6
m 10.8

32
A
a

30
道 （下層逸峯廣場） North District Temp. Wholesale Market

永
r A 12.1 A ET
y H

B
24
小 H L 59

寧
S L 11.3 H 11.9 for Agricultural Products

C
A H
c
h 學 Block 4 (Green Code Plaza under) 11.6
平台

居
A CUL
o L 3B

17
L H A
o E
12.4 H -2 H

二
l A

3
2 L A 0A 23
S Podium CUL 53A 58 -3
HL

期
h H

19
11.5
e
u HL 30 A 11.6
31

A
n L 11.8 A 11.7

6A
g H A

和 S A
第三座 10.3
A 31
h 11.5 11.2 L L

18A
A

54
VO

7
睦 u H

54

17
H
i H Tower 3 A

A
A

31B
H

4
路 11.5 26.1 12.0 W W H

d
11.6 H H

8
a
A A
街

26
A

o
326 325
座

54
H

R
L L

31C
泰

19
26.1

PROPOSED REPROVISIONING OF
三

I
3

ck
11.9 L H
帝庭軒
和

A
第

11.7

27

9
20
H H
c

²{¦³¦w¼Öªùµó
A

ÀÀijÀsÅD
永寧村污水泵房 56
o

ra
A
11.1
l

L HL H
11.8 L
B

10
T
p

21
H
W s 55 H
A

-1
Regentville A

31
12.0 HL L

28
U
O H TS

g
HL HE

1
11.4

D
A

in
TA
L A

CW

l
10.2

c
EW Outfall

28
M （ 下 層 停 車 場 及 巴 士 總 站 ）

y
LH

31

12
A

B
C
H

K
HL C
U L L

E
28

路
H

U
11.6
TS

26
L

F
H 321 322 E
K LH 11.9 HL L

道
YE
L H

B
A
A H
(Car Park & Bus Terminus under) E A 10.3 D
28
H H L 11.7

FB
H
W 11.7

28
L
R

13
11.7A H

ON LOK MUN STREET PLAYGROUND

L A

NG

A
12.2

徑
A
10.1 9.
7
O H H A 11.6

29
L

車
A L l
A 道路 Road A

LU
A
al
H L
H

單
H
tf 永寧村

22
D 12.0
FP
25.1 H H
Ou

PROPOSED LUNG EXISTING ON LOK MUN

嘉里貨倉（粉嶺１） A

-
A L L 29
8

平台 12.0A B 01A
HL 1

D
Podium G Kerry Warehouse (Fanling 1) HL 303 305 333 332 331 TS

A
TS L Wing Ning Tsuen E

RO
E H H
座

H
H W 第五座 H
L L L 11.3A L
T
二

H
12.4

29
K
Tower 5
E
第

HL
k

E
c

A
O
L L H
E

H A
o

L H L

K
10.4
l

H H H TS A
TS
R
B

H L H
L 23.7 L 11.1 H

39
12.3 L
T

U
k

H H
c

A L H
TA
A A
S

平台
r

L L 10.2
T

G H 306 307 319 317 316

（下層停車場及巴士總站） H HL 11.6 A 11.4 永寧居一期
g

A
TS
N

YEUK TAU STREET PLAYGROUND

n

Podium HL L
i

A
SH
U

G H
l

TS B
c

(Car Park & Bus Terminus under) L 61

M

13.1 HE
C

H
聯 12.2 L

302
A H
安 A
O

HL

ºc«ä¹
街
W

H TS
L G G L L
LH 11.6 R 12.8 A
VE
H H H 105
H
L A H A

RI
H
G 315
L 89
徑

308
e

安樂門街遊樂場
s

Ra mp
H
車

H t T 10.4

301
A
u
樓

H
WA
L
o

mp
Ra
HE
單

L
c

G RCP L
H

11.7 On Lok Mun Street

a
昌

11.6 H
座

H
r

11.6 11.9
g

HL L
MA
T
座

H
泰

INTERCHANGE
A

WILL BE DEMOLISHED
n

10.9
六

A A
ET
6

L Playground H
o

A
g
1
一

L 310
e

H
HL

309
n
第

H A
s
h

L
i
k

H
c
9

第
C

12.1A 13.2
oc
-6

H
c

E H
l
滿
i

A H
55

W
y
Bl

B
a

ET H H
T

L
和

HE
L H L 311
TS
5
3 L
H
HH 11.9
A H
L 河 LH 312 E
H
- 勉勵龍中心 H
笏

VIEW ANGLE OF THE ARTISTIC IMPRESSION

4 U TS ET H
d

5 L H
麻
9

E PO

ES
12.9 H H
u

萃
寶 Mineron Centre H
o

N
a i

S
r

A E TS
P Hu

昌 E
g

雲
L H TS
y

HL L
H 大 O
' Wo

H L ET
l

路
10.4 A H H
廈 N H
CUL H LH H
r en

L
徑

l
l Lu

S al
車
e

10.8 tf FP
H A
12.1
單

T
d

G H ET
Ou

h
HL H
頭
i

A
W

R H

60
E

Nulla
h
E

H
C

L E L H TS
躍

12.0 E
T
H
御庭軒 H
L
L
龍

10
A
G H TS
53

1
　
－
　
路
公
角
頭
沙

ÀÀij-«¸m¦w¼
ÀÀijÀsÅD PROPOSED REPROVISIONING
PROPOSED LUNG OF ON LOK MUN STREET
YEUK TAU PLAYGROUND
INTERCHANGE

ÀÀij-ì§}-«
²{¦³¦w¼Öªùµó Á{®É¹A²£«
EXISTING ON LOK MUN PROPOSED INSITU

STREET PLAYGROUND REPROVISIONING OF

WILL BE DEMOLISHED NORTH DISTRICT TEMPORARY

WHOLESALE MARKET FOR
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã©M°ò¦³]¬
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCED SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN AND ARTISTIC IMPRESSION OF PROPOSED LUNG YEUK TAU INTERCHANGE OF FANLING BYPASS EASTERN SECTION
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0080_E23\CDNKFNZ0080.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó1 ª ANNEX 4 TO ENCLOSURE 1

ªe¤
HO SHEUNG HEUNG

Üñ
LONG VALLEY
µø A
VIEW A

R
ù ³ RIVE
 YUE
NG
EU
SH

ÀÀijªº¥j¬} µø A
PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH SEWAGE PUMPING STATION VIEW A ¦ì¸ San
LOCATION PLANUk
Tsuen
ÀsÅ
LUNG YEUK TAU

D
¨
A
O
R
Y
K
À
O
K
F
U
Ma Shi Po

A
¨
T
A
¥Ã¹

H
S
ºa½÷ ºñ±
µø B
«Ò® VIEW B
¥Ã
R
±s® E Win
Union Plaza V
Grand I Ts
ÀÀijªº¯»À- µø B R
PROPOSED FANLING NORTH SEWAGE PUMPING STATION VIEW B ¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN
Regentville

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã©M°ò¦³]¬
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCED SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
ARTISTIC IMPRESSION OF PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FANLING NORTH SEWAGE PUMPING STATION
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0068_E21\CDNKFNZ0068.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 1
5
0
ªþ¥ó1 ª ANNEX 522.4
TO ENCLOSURE 1
2 10.7
18.2 †
† 1
0
6.7 0
†
馬 草 壟 蛇 嶺
°¨¯ 13.9
† 17.8 . 50
40.7
†
10
†

快
LU N G MA TSO LUNG

景
50
ÀÀij¥j¬}¥_¨

路
6.6† 21.9
9.1
14.6 † PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH
†
†

23.6 FLUSHING WATER SERVICE

†

<
† 29.4
22.8
† RESERVOIR 1
29.3

1
† 41.1

5
†

0
^ † 25.6
16.8† 10.1
†
164.0† 23.7
†
8.5
†
場 38.5
靶 † 6.5
9.6 †
†
23.5
湖
練
u e
W ng
1
羅 a
† Lo R

20

^
7.8 e
†

2
l
f
i
26.4 R 8.5
† †
† 4.5

^
墓 地

1†
11. 2 17.2
†
10.5
†
18.4† 24.
9
† 41.0 43.5

<
† †
ù´òÃ
羅 湖 懲 教 所
†
9.7

<
Lo W u
21.9 LO WU CORRECTIONAL
C orrect
ionalI nst
itut
ion
†
INSTITUTION
28.2
†
† 16.2 2 0

<
50 10
29.3
†
7.9
^ 22.4 33.4 2†
11.
18.2 † †
†
49.
0
<
<

†
^

6.4
† 6.7 †

2
17.9 50
† † 12.3
14.2 25.4† 2
†
26.4
ÀÀij¥j¬}¥_
15.4 †
† PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH <
10.7† 4.3

^
30.
3
16.8† FRESH WATER SERVICE †

50
†
µø 松 園
18.9 †
26.8 RESERVOIR
VIEW ANGLE Tsung Yuen
63.9†

SHE
54.9
† »ñ± 羅 湖 騎 術 會
†
6.
7

鳳 崗
FUNG 山
KONG SHAN50 ^ 23.7
† 20.7†
Lo W u

U
Saddl
e Cl ub

NG Y
壟 路

^
FU N G KO N G SHAN
馬 草

UE R
I
VER
ÀÀij¥j¬}¥_¨
PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH FLUSHING WATER SERVICE RESERVOIR

70¦ / 70M
+72.25

+66.33 +65.70

Á`®e¶q : 11500
TOTAL VOLUME: 11500m

-å-±¹Ï
SECTION 1-1

ÀÀij¥j¬}¥_
PROPOSED KWU TUNG NORTH FRESH WATER SERVICE RESERVOIR

77¦ / 77M
+91.00
+90.00

+85.00

Á`®e¶q : 27500
TOTAL VOLUME: 27500m

-å-±¹Ï
SECTION 2-2

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã©M°ò¦³]¬I¤u
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCED SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
CROSS-SECTION AND ARTISTIC IMPRESSION OF THE PROPOSED FLUSHING WATER SERVICE RESERVOIR AND FRESH WATER SERVICE RESERVOIR IN KWU TUNG NORTH
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0082_E21\CDNKFNZ0082.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó1 ª ANNEX 6 TO ENCLOSURE 1

¥Õ¥
PAK SHEK AU

¥Ñ¦æ¤HÀ
CONNECTED BY SUBWAY CASTLE PE
AK
( RO
½¸ô AD

¤s¤ (C
HA
U
«C TA
U)

¯»À- FANLING HI
GHWAY

¥j¬
KW
U
TU
NG
RO
AD

¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï«e´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã©M
PWP ITEM NO. 747CL
ADVANCED SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
ARTISTIC IMPRESSION OF PROPOSED JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT AT PAK SHEK AU
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0083_E21\CDNKFNZ0083.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 附件 1 附錄 7
Annex 7 to Enclosure 1

工務計劃項目第 747CL 號－古洞北新發展區及粉嶺北新發展區前期地盤平整和基礎設施工程

10 棵受影響珍貴樹木的詳情
PWP Item No. 747CL - Advance site formation and engineering infrastructure works for Kwu Tung North new development area and
Fanling North new development area
Details of Ten Important Trees Affected

觀賞價值(3) 健康狀況 結構狀況

品種 量度 形態 移植合適度(4)
Amenity Health Structural 提供專業意見予
樹木/樹組編 Species Measurements Form Suitability for transplanting(4) 建議處置方法
value(3) condition condition 保育狀況(5) 地政總署的部門
號(1) (2) 保留／移植／砍伐)
高度 胸徑 樹冠闊度 Conservation Department to
Tree/ Tree 學名 中文名 Recommendation
(米) (毫米) (米) (良好／一般／差劣) (高／中／低) 備註 status(5) provide expert
Group No.(1) Scientific Chinese Retain/Transplant/Fell)
Height DBH(2) Crown (Good/Fair/Poor) (High/Med/Low) Remarks advice to LandsD
name name
(m) (mm) spread (m)
T1219(5) Aquilaria sinensis 土沉香 7 170 4 一般 一般 一般 一般 中 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。 樹木生 是 移植 地政總署
(牙香樹) Fair Fair Fair Fair Medium 長在斜坡上，健康狀況一般，預計移植後的存活 Yes Transplant Lands Department
率是中等。 由於此品種保育價值高，因此建議移
植。
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works.
Tree grows on slope with fair health condition. The
survival rate after transplanting is medium. This
species is of high conservation value. It is therefore
recommended to be transplanted.
T1617(6) Eucalyptus 尾葉桉 15 1120 10 一般 差劣 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。 樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
urophylla Fair Poor Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大。健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
但形態差劣，預計移植後的存活率是低。 因此不 Fisheries and
建議移植。 Conservation
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Department
The size of the tree is very large. The heath condition
is fair but the form is poor. The survival rate after
transplanting is Low. It is therefore recommended not
to be transplanted.
T6149(6) Ficus microcarpa 細葉榕 13.5 1369 13 一般 差劣 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。 樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
Fair Poor Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大。健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
但形態差劣，預計移植後的存活率是低。 因此不 Fisheries and
建議移植。 Conservation
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Department
The size of the tree is very large. The heath condition
is fair but the form is poor. The survival rate after
transplanting is Low. It is therefore recommended not
to be transplanted.
T2638(6) Ficus microcarpa 榕樹 14 1180 12 一般 差劣 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
Fair Poor Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大。健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
但形態差劣，預計移植後的存活率是低。因此不 Fisheries and
建議移植。 Conservation
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Department
The size of the tree is very large. The heath condition
is fair but the form is poor. The survival rate after
transplanting is Low. It is therefore recommended not
to be transplanted.

1
 附件 1 附錄 7
Annex 7 to Enclosure 1

觀賞價值(3) 健康狀況 結構狀況

品種 量度 形態 移植合適度(4)
Amenity Health Structural 提供專業意見予
樹木/樹組編 Species Measurements Form Suitability for transplanting(4) 建議處置方法
value(3) condition condition 保育狀況(5) 地政總署的部門
號(1) 保留／移植／砍伐)
高度 胸徑(2) 樹冠闊度 Conservation Department to
Tree/ Tree 學名 中文名 Recommendation
(米) (毫米) (米) (良好／一般／差劣) (高／中／低) 備註 status(5) provide expert
Group No.(1) Scientific Chinese Retain/Transplant/Fell)
Height DBH(2) Crown (Good/Fair/Poor) (High/Med/Low) Remarks advice to LandsD
name name
(m) (mm) spread (m)
T6006(6) Ficus microcarpa 細葉榕 12 1793 10 一般 差劣 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
Fair Poor Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大。健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
但形態差劣，預計移植後的存活率是低。因此不 Fisheries and
建議移植。 Conservation
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Department
The size of the tree is very large. The heath condition
is fair but the form is poor. The survival rate after
transplanting is Low. It is therefore recommended not
to be transplanted.
T6010(6) Ficus microcarpa 細葉榕 12 1866 10 一般 差劣 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
Fair Poor Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大。健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
但形態差劣，預計移植後的存活率是低。因此不 Fisheries and
建議移植。 Conservation
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Department
The size of the tree is very large. The heath condition
is fair but the form is poor. The survival rate after
transplanting is Low. It is therefore recommended not
to be transplanted.
T6016(6) Ficus microcarpa 細葉榕 14 1506 10 一般 差劣 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。 樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
Fair Poor Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大。健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
但形態差劣，預計移植後的存活率是低。 因此不 Fisheries and
建議移植。 Conservation
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Department
The size of the tree is very large. The heath condition
is fair but the form is poor. The survival rate after
transplanting is Low. It is therefore recommended not
to be transplanted.
T4354(6) Cinnamomum 樟 8 1000 8 一般 一般 一般 一般 低 樹木位置與擬議工程的施工地點有衝突。 樹木的 不是 砍伐 漁農自然護理署
camphora Fair Fair Fair Fair Low 高度、胸徑和樹冠闊度非常大， 健康狀況一般， No Fell Agriculture,
預計移植後的存活率是低。因此不建議移植。 Fisheries and
Tree location is in conflict with the proposed works. Conservation
The size of the tree is very large and the heath Department
condition is fair. The survival rate after transplanting
is Low. It is therefore recommended not to be
transplanted.
KT-G9_5 (5) Aquilaria sinensis 土沉香 3-5 100 - 2-4 一般 一般 一般 一般 中 預計移植後的存活率是中等。 由於此品種保育價 是 移植 漁農自然護理署
(7)
(牙香樹) 120 Fair Fair Fair Fair Medium 值高，因此建議移植。 Yes Transplant Agriculture,
(2 nos. of The survival rate after transplanting is medium. This Fisheries and
tree ) species is of high conservation value. It is therefore Conservation
( 兩 棵樹) recommended to be transplanted. Department

註： (1) 這 10 棵樹並非《古樹名木冊》內的樹木。
(2) 樹木胸徑是指測量人員從其胸部高度位置量度的樹木直徑(量度的高度是離地 1.3 米)。
(3) 評估樹木的觀賞價值是基於它的遮蔭、避風雨、屏障、減低污染及消減噪音功能方面的效用，以及「風水」方面的重要性；分級如下－
良好：屬重要樹木，應予保留，並相應調整設計佈局。
一般：屬適宜保留的樹木，以締造優美環境，包括稍遜於「良好」級的健康樹木。
差劣：屬枯死、垂死或有潛在危險的樹木，應予移除。

2
 附件 1 附錄 7
Annex 7 to Enclosure 1

(4) 有關評估已顧及個別樹木在調查進行期間的狀況(包括健康、結構、樹齡和根部的狀況)、樹木生長環境(包括地形和易達程度)，以及樹木品種的內在特性(移植後的存活率)。
(5) 樹木編號 T1219 及兩棵位於樹組編號 KT-G9_5(共三棵)均為土沉香(牙香樹)，屬貴重或稀有品種的樹木，受《保護瀕危動植物物種條例》(第 586 章)保護。
(6) 樹木編號 T1617, T6149, T2638, T6006, T6010, T6016 及 T4354 (共七棵)的樹幹直徑等於或超逾 1.0 米 (在地面以上 1.3 米的位置量度)，因此屬珍貴樹木。
(7) 該兩棵位於樹組編號 KT-G9_5 的樹木之資料須待收回/清理土地後方能作實。

Notes: (1) The eleven trees are not listed on the Register of Old and Valuable Trees.
(2) DBH of a tree refers to its Diameter at Breast Height (i.e. measurement at 1.3 m above ground level).
(3) Amenity value of the tree is assessed by its functional values for shade, shelter, screening, reduction of pollution and noise and also its “fung shui” significance, and classified into the following
categories.
Good: important trees which should be retained by adjusting the design layout accordingly.
Fair: trees that are desirable to be retained in order to create a pleasant environment, which includes healthy specimens of lesser importance than “Good” trees.
Poor: trees that are dead, dying or potentially hazardous and should be removed.
(4) Assessment has taken into account conditions of individual trees at the time of survey (including health, structure, age and root conditions), site conditions (including topography and accessibility), and
intrinsic characters of tree species (survival rate after transplanting).
(5) Tree No. T1219 and two trees located at Tree Group No. KT-G9_5 (three trees in total) are Aquilaria sinensis, which are precious or rare species. They are protected under the Protection of Endangered
Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586).
(6) Tree Nos. T1617, T6149, T2638, T6006, T6010, T6016 及 T4354 (seven trees in total) with trunk diameter equal to or exceeding 1.0 meter (m) (measured at 1.3 m above ground level). They are
regarded as important trees.
(7) The information in these two trees in Tree Group No. KT-G9_5 could only be confirmed after land resumption/clearance.

3
 Enclosure 2

HEAD 707 – NEW TOWNS AND URBAN AREA DEVELOPMENT

Civil Engineering – Land development

7759CL – First stage of site formation and engineering infrastructure at Kwu

Tung North new development area and Fanling North new
development area

PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE

The proposed scope of works under 7759CL (the “First Stage Works”)
comprises –

(a) development of a nature park at Long Valley of about 37

hectares (ha) including provision of a visitor centre 1 and a
footbridge of about 50-metre (m) long spanning across
Sheung Yue River for connection between these two facilities;

(b) reprovisioning of two egretry sites in the Fanling North

(“FLN”) New Development Area (“NDA”) and enhancement
works to an existing egretry site in the Kwu Tung North
(“KTN”) NDA;

(c) site formation of about 2.3 ha of land (including soil treatment

works) for a village resite area and a district police station in
the KTN NDA;

(d) engineering infrastructure works including roads, drainage,

sewerage, waterworks, and landscaping works; and

(e) implementation of environmental mitigation measures and

environmental monitoring and audit (“EM&A”) programme
for the works mentioned in items (a) to (d) above.

2. Layout plans showing the proposed works are at Annex 1 to this

Enclosure. The general layout plan of the Long Valley Nature Park (“LVNP”)
and the artistic impression of the proposed visitor centre and footbridge are at
Annex 2 and Annex 3 to this Enclosure respectively.

1
The site area of the visitor centre is about 1 000 square metres (m2).
3. Subject to funding approval of the Finance Committee (“FC”) of the
Legislative Council (“LegCo”), we plan to commence construction of the
proposed works in the fourth quarter of 2019 for completion in end 2026. To
meet the works programme, the Civil Engineering and Development Department
(“CEDD”) will invite tenders for the works contracts from March 2019
progressively, but the works contracts will only be awarded upon obtaining
funding approval from the FC.

JUSTIFICATION

4. We are determined to press ahead with the implementation of the KTN

and FLN NDAs as a medium and long-term measure to increase land supply.
Upon full development, the KTN and FLN NDAs will yield a total of about 71
800 housing units (of which about 48 500 or nearly 70% are public housing),
accommodating a new population of about 188 100; and also about 868 000
square metres (m2) floor area for economic activities, generating some 40 100
employment opportunities 2.

5. The KTN and FLN NDAs will be implemented in two phases: First
Phase and Remaining Phase. The First Stage Works is part of the First Phase
development. Under the First Stage Works, we will carry out proposed works to
conserve and enhance the ecologically important environment of the core area of
the Long Valley as well as other ecological mitigation/ enhancement works in
parallel with the NDAs development. These works were identified in the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report for the North East New
Territories NDAs Planning and Engineering Study (“NENT NDAs Study”) 3 ,
which was approved with conditions under the Environmental Impact Assessment
Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap. 499) in October 2013.

6. Long Valley is the largest contiguous freshwater wetland in Hong

Kong widely recognised for its high ecological value and environmental
significance. As part and parcel of the NDAs project, we will develop some 37
ha of land at the core area of Long Valley into a nature park for conserving and
enhancing the ecologically important environment as well as for compensation of

2
The total employment opportunities of 40 100 include those to be generated from the planned
“government, institution or community” uses.
3
The North East New Territories New Development Areas Planning and Engineering Study was a
planning and engineering study to establish a planning and development framework for the KTN, FLN and
Ping Che/Ta Kwu Ling NDAs.

2
the wetland loss due to the NDAs development. We will provide essential
infrastructure works, including provision of a visitor centre, a footbridge and other
supporting infrastructure and ancillary facilities.

7. Opportunities are also taken to develop a visitor zone at LVNP, to

demonstrate the diversity of wetland ecosystem and promote public awareness on
nature conservation. The approximately 4.8 ha outdoor visitor zone, comprising
boardwalks, bird hide and different landscape features and facilities, is designed
to enrich visitors’ experience through exploring wetlands, crops and wildlife in a
natural setting.

8. We will re-provide/enhance egretry sites as replacement of the existing

egretry at Man Kam To Road which will be affected by the NDAs development.
Compensatory planting and habitat enhancement works will be carried out at the
egretry reprovisioning/enhancement sites under the First Stage Works.

9. The First Stage Works also includes site formation works for the sites
reserved for village resite area and future district police station in the KTN NDA.
The village resite area in the KTN NDA is for the re-provisioning of affected
village houses/building lots in the KTN under the Village Removal Terms. We
will strictly comply with the recommendations and approval conditions of the EIA
report in carrying out the soil treatment works for the hotspots with high levels of
arsenic.

10. To tie in with the NDAs development, timely completion of the

engineering infrastructure works as well as the environmental mitigation/
enhancement works is necessary. Upon completion, the formed land will be
handed over by phases to relevant parties for development. The LVNP and
infrastructure works will be handed over to relevant government departments for
management and maintenance.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

11. We estimate the capital cost of the First Stage Works to be $896.4
million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

12. The draft Outline Zoning Plans (“OZPs”) for the KTN and FLN NDAs
were exhibited for public inspection under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap.
131) from 20 December 2013 to 20 February 2014. During the statutory
planning process, a total of more than 53 000 representations and comments were

3
received. After giving consideration to the representations and comments in
April 2015, the Town Planning Board decided not to propose any amendments to
the draft OZPs to meet the representations. On 16 June 2015, the Chief
Executive in Council approved the KTN and FLN OZPs, which were then
exhibited for public inspection on 19 June 2015.

13. The proposed road scheme (the “Road Scheme”) under the Roads
(Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap 370) for the First Stage Works
was gazetted on 31 December 2015 and 8 January 2016. A total of 5 760 4
objections to the Road Scheme were received during the statutory objection
period. 26 out of 5 760 objections to the Road Scheme were subsequently
withdrawn unconditionally and considered resolved. To ameliorate the effects of
the proposed works in addressing the public concerns and to accommodate design
development, amendments to the Road Scheme (the “Amendment Road Scheme”)
were developed and gazetted on 18 and 25 November 2016. Another 4 536 5
objections to the Amendment Road Scheme were received. 18 out of 4 536
objections to the Amendment Road Scheme were subsequently withdrawn
unconditionally and considered resolved. The unresolved objections were
mainly related to the overall planning and development of the KTN and FLN
NDAs, resumption of land affected by the proposed works, compensation and
rehousing (C&R) arrangement for affected villagers, health risks, as well as
environmental and traffic impacts arising from the proposed works.

14. In response to the public views on C&R arrangements, the Government

announced on 10 May 2018 the unified and enhanced general ex-gratia C&R
arrangement for government development clearance exercises (the “unified and
enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement”). The unified and enhanced ex-gratia
C&R arrangement relating to various existing and new ex-gratia allowances
(EGAs) was approved by FC on 18 July 2018. We have provided the relevant
information of the unified and enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement to the
objectors who expressed concerns on the C&R arrangement during the statutory
objection period for the Road Scheme and the Amendment Road Scheme as
mentioned in paragraph 13 above. Subsequent to the further comments
submitted by the objectors and the announcement of the unified and enhanced
ex-gratia C&R arrangement, 43 out of 5 760 objections to the Road Scheme were
eventually withdrawn unconditionally and considered resolved. 28 out of 4 536
objections to the Amendment Road Scheme were eventually withdrawn
unconditionally and considered resolved. The remaining objections were
considered unresolved.

4
Among them, 5 725 objections were received through standard letters.
5
Among them, 4 363 objections were received through standard letters.

4
15. Having considered the unresolved objections and the proposed road
works as described in the Road Scheme as amended by the Amendment Road
Scheme, the Chief Executive in Council authorised the proposed works. The
notices of authorisation were gazetted on 14 December 2018.

16. Following the announcement of the unified and enhanced ex-gratia

C&R arrangement on 10 May 2018, we briefed the LegCo and local stakeholders
(such as relevant District Councils, Rural Committees) as well as the clearees
(including residents’ groups and concern groups) affected by key development
clearance exercises in the pipeline (including the KTN and FLN NDAs) on
various occasions regarding the C&R arrangement as well as major concerns in
relation to the NDAs from May 2018 to January 2019. On 14 June 2018, the
North District Council (NDC) was consulted on and supported the unified and
enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement and the implementation of the KTN and
FLN NDAs, including the proposed First Stage Works.

17. We will maintain close dialogues with local stakeholders, including the
affectees, residents’ groups as well as the NDC Members, the Fanling District
Rural Committee and the Sheung Shui District Rural Committee throughout the
implementation of the First Stage Works.

18. Regarding the development of LVNP, we held two consultation forums

on 26 January 2017 and 26 September 2018 respectively with green groups
including the Conservancy Association, the Environmental Association, the Green
Power, the Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, the Kadoorie Farm and Botanic
Garden, the World Wide Fund for Nature, Hong Kong to solicit their views on the
proposed works. They generally welcomed the proposal.

19. We consulted the Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges

and Associated Structures 6 on the proposed aesthetic design of the footbridge for
connection between the visitor centre and LVNP. The Committee accepted the
proposed aesthetic design.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

6
The Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated Structures, comprising
representatives of the Hong Kong Institute of Architects, the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, the
Hong Kong Institute of Planners, the Architectural Services Department, the Highways Department, the
Housing Department, the CEDD, and architectural or relevant faculties from local institutions, is
responsible for vetting the design of bridges and other structures associated with the highway system,
including noise barriers and enclosures, from the aesthetic and visual impact points of view.

5
20. The NENT NDAs Study is a Designated Project (DP) under Schedule 3
of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap 499). Some of the
proposed works under the NENT NDAs are DPs under Schedule 2 of the EIAO
and Environmental Permits (EPs) are required for their construction and
operation.

21. In October 2013, the EIA report for the NENT NDAs was approved
with conditions under the EIAO. The relevant EPs for construction and
operation were issued in November 2013. The EIA report concluded that the
environmental impacts of the NENT NDAs can be controlled to within the criteria
under EIAO and the Technical Memorandum on EIA Process. We shall
implement the measures recommended in the approved EIA report, and comply
with the relevant conditions under the EPs. The key measures include ecological
mitigation measures to develop an approximately 37 ha nature park at Long
Valley to compensate for wetland loss in the KTN and FLN NDAs; and
enhancement of egretry sites. We have included the cost of implementing the
environmental mitigation measures as well as the EM&A programme in the
overall project estimate.

22. For controlling the short-term environmental impacts caused by the

proposed works during construction, we will incorporate the recommended
mitigation measures and implementation of EM&A programme into the relevant
works contracts to control environmental impacts arising from the construction
works to comply with established standard and guidelines. These measures
include regular watering of exposed site area to reduce emission of fugitive dust,
the use of movable noise barriers and of quiet plant to reduce noise generation,
and the use of trucks with cover or enclosed containers for waste transportation.

23. At the planning and design stages, we have considered all the proposed
works and construction sequences to reduce generation of construction waste
where possible. In addition, we will require the contractors to reuse insert
construction waste (e.g. excavated soil) on site or in other suitable construction
sites as far as possible in order to minimise the disposal of insert construction
waste at public fill reception facilities (PFRF) 7 . We will encourage the
contractors to maximise the use of recycled or recyclable inert construction waste,
and the use of non-timber formwork to further reduce the generation of
construction waste.

7
Public fill reception facilities (PFRF) are specified in Schedule 4 of the Waste Disposal (Charges
for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap 354N). Disposal of inert construction waste in
PFRF requires a license issued by the Director of Civil Engineering and Development.

6
24. At the construction stage, we will require the contractors to submit for
approval a plan setting out the waste management means, which will include
appropriate mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, reuse and recycle inert
construction waste. We will ensure that the day-to-day operations on site comply
with the approved plan. We will require the contractors to separate the inert
portion from non-inert construction waste on site to for disposal at appropriate
facilities. We will control the disposal of construction waste through a trip-ticket
system.

25. We estimate that the First Stage Works will generate in total about
49 200 tonnes of construction waste. Of these, we will reuse about 42 300
tonnes (about 86%) of inert construction waste on the sites under the First Stage
Works and temporarily stockpile about 6 000 tonnes (about 12%) of inert
construction waste for subsequent reuse in the Remaining Phase of the KTN and
FLN NDAs development. We will dispose of the remaining 900 tonnes (about
2%) of non-inert construction waste at landfills. The total cost for disposal of
the construction waste at landfill is estimated to be about $180 000 for the First
Stage Works (based on a unit charge rate of $200 per tonne for disposal at
landfills as stipulated in the Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction
Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N)).

TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS

26. We completed a traffic impact assessment, which revealed that there

will not be significant traffic impact due to the First Phase of the NDAs
development, including the First Stage Works, during the operation and
construction stages. Temporary traffic arrangements (TTAs) will be
implemented to facilitate the construction works. We will establish a Traffic
Management Liaison Group (TMLG) comprising representatives of the CEDD,
the Transport Department, the Hong Kong Police Force and other stakeholders to
discuss, scrutinise and review the TTAs proposed by the contractors with a view
to minimising traffic impact arising from the First Stage Works. In addition, we
will set up a telephone hotline to respond to public enquiries or complaints.
HERITAGE IMPLICATIONS

27. We have completed a cultural heritage assessment under the EIA for
the NENT NDAs. It concluded that the proposed works would not affect any
heritage site, i.e. all declared monuments, proposed monuments, graded historic
sites/buildings and Government historic sites identified by the Antiquities and
Monuments Office.

7
28. We will also comply with the recommendations of the EIA report to
carry out a baseline condition survey and baseline vibration impact assessment for
identified built heritage adjacent to the works sites before commencement of the
works and to evaluate if construction vibration monitoring and structural
strengthening measures are required during construction to safeguard compliance
with the vibration standard stated in the EIA report.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

29. We upgraded 7759CL to Category B in September 2012.

30. We engaged consultants to carry out detailed design and site

investigation for 7759CL in November 2014. The consultancy fees and site
investigation works for the First Stage Works were charged to block allocation
Subhead 7100CX “New towns and urban area works, studies and investigation for
items in Category D of Public Works Programme” at a total cost of about $28.96
million in MOD prices. We have substantially completed the detailed design of
the proposed works under the First Stage Works.

31. Of the 696 trees within the boundary of the First Stage Works, 656
trees will be preserved, whereas the remaining 40 trees will have to be felled.
All trees to be felled are not important trees 8. We will incorporate planting
proposals as part of the Advance Works as compensatory planting.

Development Bureau
Civil Engineering and Development Department
January 2019

8
“Important trees” refers to trees in the Register of Old and Valuable Trees, or any other trees that
meet one or more of the following criteria –
(a) trees of 100 years old or above;
(b) trees of cultural, historical or memorable significance e.g. Fung Shui tree, tree as landmark of
monastery or heritage monument, and trees in memory of an important person or event;
(c) trees of precious or rare species;
(d) trees of outstanding form (taking account of overall tree sizes, shape and any special features)
e.g. trees with curtain like aerial roots, trees growing in unusual habitat; or
(e) trees with trunk diameter equal to or exceeding 1.0 m (measured at 1.3 m above ground level),
or with height/canopy spread equal to or exceeding 25m.

8
 ªþ¥ó2 ªþ¿ý1 (2±i¹ ANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 2 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
Chuk
¦Ë
Yuen

WONG MAU HANG

SHAN
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Leachate
¬û

R
Treatment Works

E
V
¹Ï
KONG YIU

I
R
N
»ÉÆ

E
°ï¶

H
TUNG LO

NZ
Landfill
ĵ HANG

E
H
Police Post
ªF- ©ù

S
¸û¼ TUNG FUNG NGONG TONG
Kaw Liu AU
Village
¦
¤ì´ò ² `

LEGEND: Muk Wu
ĵ Às§
°t¤ ĵ
Police Post LUNG MEI
©â¤ Ser Res PoliceNga Yiu
Pumping
Post
¥´¹ª ²À TENG
S (P
Station
Ta Kwu Kan
Ling Tau Wai GA
Village
N
GE
IN R)
¥ËŽ ¥Û¹
¤ì IVE
R G YUENR Nga Yiu Ha SHEK TSAI HA
Muk Wu VE
RI
¦Ñ¹
ĵ
Police
¤åÀ LO SHUE LING
¥´¹

¥
Post MAN KAM TO
TA KWU LING ¤ô¤

-
183
¶í SHUI NGAU TSO

-
Tong Fong
»ñ° ¥Û
¥Ý®
Fung Wong Wu SHEK O Wo Keng Shan
¶g¥ ĵ
Police Post ©W

¥j¬}¥_·sµ
Chow Tin Tsuen
Ping Yeung
«n §õ ¤ô
·s« T

±
NAM HANG Lei Uk
Ä®´ San Uk Ling ¸ Shui Hau
HOO HOK WAI Ò
¶êÀ ¹
ä

A
¤j¨ YUEN LENG
Ã

R
CHAI ĵ

IV
TA SHA LOK ª@¥

å
Police

ER
¤

PI
Post Sing Ping Village

GN

N
AG

G
E
S
Sandy Ridge Cemetery
¨FÀ-

HC
(P
BOUNDARY OF KWU TUNG NORTH

E
E
G

IN
D
F I Cheung Shan Monastery

G
R
¨D Y O
RA

YU
D
ÂùÉÓ

AD
±o¤ N

ï
ù

EN
®Æ LECKY PASS A

RO
Tak Yuet Lau Lo Wu

R
Liu Pok S
®£À

Lo
( SEUNG MA ¥´¹ªÀ

ù

IV
LEI YUE ) ĵ ¬û¥ Ta Kwu Ling Farm

TO

E
Police KONG NGA PO HUNG LUNG

183

R)
Wu
ĵ Post HANG

©
¤j®

± ï

M
NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA ù
Police

KA
ªø

W
Post Tai Po Tin
¥

à
CHEUNG SHAN
LO WU ¤ô¬

N
-

MA
¨F ©W
¿ß Shui Lau Hang
ª STAG HILL
Sha Ling

e
Ping Che
¥Û

in
ĵ

RI

l
Police Post SHEK MA

VE

e
©Wà|

ip
«H¸q

R
el Ping Che

P
Lutheran ¤j¥ ¤ô unn

®
New Village

IN
¿é T

É
New Village CREST HILL
r °t¤

DU
(NG

¾
¤û¨ ( TAI SHEK MO )
te Ser Res °t¤
Wa ¤W¤s

S
HORN HILL ĵ Ser Res
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Police ¹v Sheung Shan

TU
Post ®à (ªø¨j Firing Range Kai Wat ±Òª
¤U¤s ¥ÕÅ

NG
ÅÂÀ

ÀÀij¤uµ{
TABLE HILL Kai Fong ¾î¤s¸
¸¨°¨¬wª Ha Shan PAK HOK

RIV
Tse Koo °¨¯óà ( CHEUNG PO TAU )
SHAN Garden Wang Shan Keuk
LOK MA CHAU LOOP Hang Ma Tso Lung
µÚ §ü Kai Wat
San Tsuen
¤j¬

ER
Ngam Pin CHAM SHAN
San Tsuen
ù´ò¤À

)
TAI HOM TUK
°¨¯ Lo Wu Classification Range
±ÆÀ ¬õ¾ô
MA ryTSO LUNG
©W a VERNON PASS
Âo¤ Hung Kiu
in
e
d ( PAI TAU LO ) l¥Õ¥Ð
PING HANG n Water Treatment San Tsuen pe
u ªê¦a Pi Pak Tin
o Works
New Village
B ù´òà ¾É À- Ma Mei Ha
Leng Tsai

°¨¯
Lo Wu

PROPOSED WORKS BOUNDARY

Correctional Institution
a FU
AN ¹p¤
¤jà Q

· s
e ¹v
µØ SH CAT HILL ¾î ¨
r TEI

NG TUNG
TAI LAW HAU A Firing AU ROAD ¾É
WA SHAN ¿é G ª WANG LENG Y
Range
ne
¤ô À
Pipeli ¤W¤ô UN F

²
¤UÆ »ñ± ·s³ò/¤jÀ ¤Õ
¸¨° d Sheung Shui Water TS
Tunnel ¨ ²À

¸¨°
Ha Wan FUNG KONG SHAN Hung Leng
e Wa Shan San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range Kan Tau Tsuen
¸¨° Tsuen LOK MA CHAU s
o ªQ
l
Ma Chau C Tsung Yuen µR¤û
Lok
W °¨À RI
¸¨° ¤ °ª® VE
e HIGH HILL LAMB HILL -x¦ R
ÅK ª ( MA TAU LENG ) §d« JHELUM
Lok Ma r Kwan Tei North Ko Po North

R OAD
AD ¤

¥ Û¤
e Tit Hang Ng Uk Tsuen ¤¦¦Ë§
Chau
t
i RO ¦
Ãä n ¤ Tan Chuk Hang
¹Ò o K Lo Wai
¸T r ¤å» ¤U¥ KO
F

H E UNG
·à¦
Ha
Man Kok Pak Tsuen
¤W TA
U °ª®

MA TSO LUNG

RIV
ªe¤

LOK MA CHAU
DUKES HILL

ÀÀij¹D¸ô¤uµ{ (¥]¬A
ÁA± »ñ ¦Ã¤ô³ Village
Ho Sheung ¤¤¤ KO PO SHAN ( SZE TEI SHAN )

ER
Lookout Fung Kong ¤W¥
Sewage Treatment Chung LAU
A
Heung SHEUNG SHUI °ª

SUT
¤UÆWº® Works Sum
Sheung ¤p§| SH
ĵ

LEJ
NG ªù¤ TsuenPak Ko Po

(S
¤Ñ¥-

HS
Ha Wan Fisherman ³ò¤ Siu Hang -x ·s¶
Police EU Tsuen ¤p§

UI
HE
Post San Tsuen
Mun Hau
ªF SH Tin Ping Shan San Tsuen -x San Tong Po

K
Wai Loi ¤j¤
Tsuen Siu Hang Kwan Tei
Üñ Barracks

SH
Tung Fong Tsuen Tsuen
O Tai Yuen Tsuen
¤TÄ ¼ï«

EUN
LOK
H
³@¤ »AÄR

EH
KW AN
Pun Uk Tsuen LONG VALLEY IV
R ER) Tsuen

G
¶í

UN G
SAM PO SHUE Po Sheung Tsui Lai

¸ ¨
EAST RAIL LINE Tong Kok Tsuen Garden
¿³¤

MA
Hing Yan TUNGRIVER) ÂÑÀ
± (NG Kan Lung ªù T
Tsuen «³» EI ÁA±

° ¨
ï

PROPOSED ROAD WORKS

S Gate Tower
DU °¨®Æ¤ R

CH
Woodland ® IN
Tsuen I Lookout Hok Tau Pai
¬w ¥Û¥ ·s VE

OR
Ma Liu Shui

AU
ªa Crest ER
V ªê¦
RI

AD
Chau Tau ¥Û¥JÀ Shek Tsai San Tsuen R
Å San Wai

J
¥Õ¥ Sw P

OC
ªF Dills Corner Leng Fu Tei Pai

¤W

ROAD
Pak Shek Au ¥Û´ò

K
Garden ¥Û´ ¤j

E
·s«

Y
Shek Wu

SA
¥j SHEK WU HUI San Tsuen
San Uk Tai Wo ¤jÀ

N
Kwu Tung ªQ¬

C
¯Q¾~

- ¦ª
Tsuen
ÀsÅ ¬Ó¦ TAI LENG PEI

L
¸ ¿P Tsung Pak Long ¾

U
S
Wu Nga HO
À¤
9

B
Yin Kong É ¬Ó© QUEEN'S HILL K

A
(WITH APPROPRIATE
¯ Lok Yeung

M
¼Ú·N «È® Pi ¤Ñ¥ Noble Hill LUNG YEUK TAU

R
¥Ð
·s FANLIN

OA
G pe Tin Ping °¨«

RO
Europa Garden HIGHWA Hak Ka Wai

108
ªFÂ l ¤

AD
Y

D
Estate

A
¥¬¸ KWU
in W ÆF¤
Ma Shi Po

°
D
¤jÀ

RO
¤¯¹ Tung Chan TUN
G R ±m»
e S ¥Ã¹
·s OAD he

¨
Shau Wai
¤j· Ling Shan ºa½÷ ºñ±
Yan Wai 9 Tai TauChoi Po u Town Hall ºaºÖ Wing Ning

·
ÅbÃ
¬ ¤Å
ng Tsuen ¥¬¦

N
SAN TIN Leng Wing FaiBelair Monte
Wing Fok
¤Ñ Court Wai

UE
¦wÀ ¥Ã¥ °t¤ « ¤W¤ô ¹

SHEUNG SHUI
Centre Centre
«Ò® Po Kat Tsai Hok Tau Wai
C S Sheung Shui

S
Wing Ping Valais h ÆF ¥Ã¹
On Lung Tsuen Ser Res ª÷

T
Tsuen ¤ ±m¶ ui Centre Regentville ªF»
½ Choi Yuen ¦°®
Estate LING HILL ®üÁp R
E Wing Ning
Kam Tsin ±½º ±s®

INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS)
Åï®p¤ ¹ÅÄR V Tung Kok

N
¤j¤ CASTLE P
EA Union Plaza Tsuen ¬y¤

TI
Casas Domingo K Grand RI Wai
Man Lun Fung Yuk Po So
Court Kwun Po

WAT
Tai Fu Tai Lau Shui Heung
¿»¥ RO Regentville
Ancestral Hall Mansion
AD ªù ³ÂÓ

N
Fan Tin ¥_°Ï ¯»À- Entrance
Áp©

SA
Ma Wat
·sÀ Tsuen ³ ±sªL North District Fanling Garden Tower
ÄQÅ Tsuen
San Lung ù The Royal Oaks Park LUEN WO HUI ³ÂÓ

MA
HADDEN HILL ÁA±
Tsuen  ¤Ó¥ ¯¨°
( KI LUN SHAN )
¤û Tai Ping
Ma Wat Wai
Tsz Tong
Lookout
ÄQÅ ¯»À ¯»À
«CÀ NGAU TEI Estate ¦w¼ ¦Ñ Tsuen
Ki Lun ¥j¬} ¥_°Ï Fanling Wai Fan Leng On Lok Tsuen Lo Wai
Tsing Lung
AD
Tsuen
KWU TUNG North District Lau ¬y¤

RIVER
RO Tsuen Hospital §d« ±RÁ
RESERVOIR
Äéµ@

A
AK Ng Uk Tsuen ª Shung Him
Hop Shing PE
Wai Âù³½ªe¶

Â
À
Tong LAU SHUI HEUNG
LE «C Beas River Country Club ±s¬

³
R)
ST

»
F ªa IRRIGATION RESERVOIR
CA ¤s Royal Green A

VE
¿ é¤

¯
§|ÀY N
L
Sw P
¯»

RI
Hang Tau ¹Å² ING ô
³À§

ÀÀij¦a

YUE
²Mª
¸OÀY Ka Shing ²»µ
Luk Mei
Tsuen
Tai Po
Ching Ho Âû
Estate
¸U» Court Cheung Wah FANLING
Y Pei Tau Kai Leng H
WA Belair Villa I ¯ Estate

G
GH °ªº¸¤ Ling Kok »

D
HI G

N
E
U
N ¹Åº H

A
TI ¦Ì®H Fa

H
W
ÄQÅï

¥j¬}¥_·
R

R BEAS
¥Û´ O

(S
Ka Fuk A
Mai Po Lung Y
nl SHEK AU SHAN
Shek Wu Wai ´^À SADDLE PASS M -Ü« Estate ing ¶í
Tsuen »ZÀ

K
( KI LUN SHAN AU ) A CHONG TSIN
Pang Loon Tei
Tong Hang

nel
LENG PO LENG

VE
¯»À- ¤s¤õÁ

N
AU ¶À±

RI

FA
½¼¤ »Z ¯ Fanling Fire Lookout

Tun
Centre WONG KONG
Ha Kung Tei PO LENG À Às
ºÖ¥ ¤þ ½¹½ SHAN

PROPOSED SITE FORMATION

¤ LUNG SHAN
¦Ã¤ô³ §| FUK TSUEN SHAN Ping Kong ½¹½º °t¤
¹v WU TIP
¸

ter
Sewage Hang Tau
¦w ¤û Firing SHAN Wu Tip Shan
Ser Res
Treatment
On Po TARGET VALLEYRange Village

Wa
Works

KWU TUNG NORTH

¥Û´ò³ 9
ºÑ´ò EA
Shek Wu Wai
-x Avon Park
Barracks
ST
San Tsuen ¤pê ´º² ²o´ ¶í§|
ªY² King Shing
Dawning Views RA Tong Hang
Siu Hum
Yan Court
Shing I Tung Chuen
Tsuen L
µ{¨

ô
Court µØ¤
-ð¤ Golf Course Wah Sum ©M¦X¥

LI
¤
Maple Gardens TSING KEI HANG
Tong Kung Leng ªá³£ Estate ®Ü¥J

N
Wo Hop Shek

E
Flora Plaza San Tsuen
KAT TSAI SHAN AU

NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

¿
©M¿ ©M¦X

ü ¤
ªø Wo Hing
Wo Hop Shek
¹êÅç

ª
©÷² Tsuen Village
Cheung Lek Experimental

F
Cheong Shing
µØ©

ÀÀijÜñ-ì¦Û

§
Farm Court Wah Ming Estate

Å
ºß° ¹l²
Yung Shing
©M¦
¹v ½¬¶ KEI LAK TSAI Court
Firing Lin Tong Mei WO HOP SHEK
Range ÁA± µe¬
Lookout Wa Mei Shan
¤EÀs§
¸²µ Kau Lung Hang
¤j ¤õ¸
The Vineyard Crematorium Lo Wai
Tai Lung
¾ô
-x ³¯« Kiu Tau

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LONG VALLEY

Barracks
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
¿¼ Chan Uk Po
½¬¶í§
¯E
Gallant
TSIU KENG Lin Tongºq½
Mei
Garden
Tsoi Yuen
The Green
¿¼®| ´º¥ ¤EÀs§

D
¤

ROA
¼ Tsiu Keng Tribute Kau Lung Hang ¤EÀs
§¸
¦Ã¤ô³ Âo¤ Lo Wai Garden San Wai

0
Sewage Treatment CLOUDY HILL
Water Treatment Works ¿¼®| ÁÚº¸
Works ( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
Tsiu Keng Miami Crescent ¤¸

AM
«nµ Yuen Leng

NATURE PARK
Pang Uk

K
©M¦X¥ Nam Wa Po
¿¼®|

0
Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
Tsiu Keng

N
A
TA

e
San Wai

F
lin
M
¤û¼

pe
1

SHUI H
Àç

Pi
NGAU TAM MEI Ying Pun

A
ANG

À
»
¤j

¯
Tai Wo
¿é¤ô ®õ¦ë¦
Water Tai Hang
Tunne ®õ¦ë¯
l Fui Sha Wai

ÀÀijÀu¤
¿é Tai Hang
¤ô Tsz Tong ®õ¦ë¤
Tsuen

PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT OF EGRETRY SITE

¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN
ÀÀij¦æ
PROPOSED FOOTBRIDGE
¤À°Ïĵ¸pª ÀÀijªº¶m
PROPOSED SITE FOR DISTRICT POLICE STATION PROPOSED VILLAGE RESITE AREA

ªF
Å
EA
»ñ ªe¤

ST
FUNG KONG
134 HO SHEUNG HEUNG

RA
10
0

IL
L
Üñ

I
N
E
LONG VALLEY

¸¨°¨¬
R LINE
LOK MA CHAU SPU
ÀÀijÜñ-
ºA¤½¶é¹
PROPOSED VISITOR CENTRE FOR
LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK
¬
°¨ LIN
E
¸¨AU SPUR ¥j ÀÀij¦æ
CH Y
MA
¦{À KWU TUNG PROPOSED
LOK ( ¿P
«C ¤½ AD FOOTBRIDGE 16
K RO
9
A YIN KONG
CASTLE PE )
U TAU
A
(CH ¥¬
¸ KWU TU
NG ROA
D
¯»¤½
FANLING HI 9
GH
WA
Y

1
0
0

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï²Ä¤@´Á¦a½L¥-¾
PWP ITEM NO. 759CL
FIRST STAGE OF SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN (KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA)
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0062_KTN_E26\CDNKFNZ0062_KTN.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó2 ªþ¿ý1 (2±i¹ ANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
Chuk
¦Ë
Yuen

WONG MAU HANG

SHAN
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Leachate
¬û

R
Treatment Works

E
V
KONG YIU

I
¹Ï

R
N
»ÉÆ

E
°ï¶

H
TUNG LO

NZ
Landfill
ĵ HANG

E
H
Police Post
ªF- ©ù

S
¸û¼ TUNG FUNG NGONG TONG
Kaw Liu AU
Village
¦
¤ì´ò ² `
ĵ Às§

LEGEND:
°t¤ ĵ Muk Wu
Police Post LUNG MEI
©â¤ Ser Res PoliceNga Yiu
Pumping
Post
¥´¹ª ²À TENG
S (P

5
Station
¤ì Ta Kwu Kan
Ling Tau Wai GA
Village
N
GE
I ER)
¥ËŽ ¥Û¹
R
NG RIV Nga Yiu Ha
Muk Wu VE YUEN SHEK TSAI HA
RI
¦Ñ¹

3
ĵ
Police
¤åÀ LO SHUE LING
¥´¹

¥
Post MAN KAM TO
TA KWU LING ¤ô¤

-
1
¶í SHUI NGAU TSO

-
Tong Fong
»ñ° ¥Û
¥Ý®
Fung Wong Wu SHEK O Wo Keng Shan
¶g¥ ĵ
Police Post ©W
Chow Tin Tsuen

¯»À-¥_·sµ
Ping Yeung
«n §õ ¤ô
NAM HANG ·s« T Lei Uk
Ä®´ San Uk Ling ¸ Shui Hau

¯»À-¥_·
HOO HOK WAI Ò
¶êÀ ¹
ä

A
¤j¨ YUEN LENG
Ã

RI
CHAI ĵ
TA SHA LOK ª@¥

VE
Police

PI
Sing Ping Village

R
Post

GN

NG
AG
ES
Sandy Ridge Cemetery
¨FÀ-

HC
(P

E
E

BOUNDARY OF FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

G

IN
D
F I Cheung Shan Monastery

FANLING NORTH

G
R
¨D Y O
RA

YUE
D
ÂùÉÓ

AD
±o¤ ù N
®Æ LECKY PASS A

N
RO
Tak Yuet Lau Lo Wu

R
Liu Pok S
®£À

Lo
( SEUNG MA ¥´¹ªÀ

ù

I
LEI YUE ) ĵ ¬û¥

VE
Ta Kwu Ling Farm

TO
Police KONG NGA PO HUNG LUNG

R
Wu

)
ĵ Post HANG

©
¤j®

± ï

M
Police
ù

KA
ªø

W
Post Tai Po Tin
¥

à
CHEUNG SHAN

NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

LO WU ¤ô¬

N
-

MA
¨F ©W
¿ß Shui Lau Hang
ª STAG HILL
Sha Ling

e
Ping Che
¥Û

n
ĵ

RIV

li
Police Post SHEK MA

pe
©Wà|

ER
«H¸q

i
ÀÀij¤uµ{
el Ping Che

P
Lutheran ¤j¥ ¤ô unn New Village

IN
¿é T

É
New Village CREST HILL
r °t¤

DU
(NG

¾
¤û¨ ( TAI SHEK MO )
te Ser Res °t¤
Wa ¤W¤s

S
HORN HILL ĵ Ser Res
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Police ¹v Sheung Shan

TU
Post ®à (ªø¨j Firing Range Kai Wat ±Òª
ÅÂÀ ¤U¤s ¥ÕÅ

NG
TABLE HILL Kai Fong ¾î¤s¸
¸¨°¨¬wª Ha Shan PAK HOK

RIV
Tse Koo °¨¯óà ( CHEUNG PO TAU )
SHAN Garden Wang Shan Keuk
LOK MA CHAU LOOP Hang Ma Tso Lung
µÚ §ü Kai Wat
San Tsuen
¤j¬

ER
Ngam Pin CHAM SHAN
San Tsuen
ù´ò¤À

)
TAI HOM TUK
°¨¯

PROPOSED WORKS BOUNDARY

Lo Wu Classification Range
±ÆÀ ¬õ¾ô
MA ryTSO LUNG
©W a VERNON PASS
Âo¤ Hung Kiu
in
e
d ( PAI TAU LO ) l¥Õ¥Ð
PING HANG n Water Treatment San Tsuen pe
o
u Works ªê¦a Pi Pak Tin
B ù´òà ¾É À- New Village
Ma Mei Ha
Lo Wu Leng Tsai
Correctional Institution
a FU
AN ¹p¤
¤jà Q

· s
e ¹v
µØ SH CAT HILL ¾î ¨
r TEI
TAI LAW HAU A Firing AU ROAD ¾É
WA SHAN ¿é G ª WANG LENG Y
Range
ne
¤ô À
Pipeli ¤W¤ô UN F

²
¤UÆ »ñ± ·s³ò/¤jÀ ¤Õ
¸¨° d Sheung Shui Water TS
Tunnel ¨ ²À

¸¨°
Ha Wan FUNG KONG SHAN Hung Leng
e Wa Shan San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range Kan Tau Tsuen
¸¨° Tsuen LOK MA CHAU s
o ªQ

4
l
Ma Chau C Tsung Yuen µR¤û
Lok
W °¨À RI
¸¨° ¤ °ª® VE
HIGH HILL LAMB HILL -x¦

ÀÀij-«¸
e R

0
ÅK ª ( MA TAU LENG ) §d« JHELUM
Lok Ma r Kwan Tei North Ko Po North D

R OA D
¤

6
A

¥Û
e Tit Hang Ng Uk Tsuen ¤¦¦Ë§
Chau
t
i RO ¦

¤
Ãä n ¤ Tan Chuk Hang
¹Ò o K Lo Wai
¸T r ¤å» ¤U¥ KO

1
F

G
·à¦
¤W

H EU N
Ha Pak Tsuen U
Man Kok
TA °ª®

RI
ªe¤

LOK MA CHAU
ÁA± »ñ Village DUKES HILL

VE
Ho Sheung ¦Ã¤ô³ ¤¤¤ KO PO SHAN ( SZE TEI SHAN )
Lookout Fung Kong ¤W¥

R
Sewage Treatment Chung LAU
A
Heung SHEUNG SHUI °ª

S
¤UÆWº® Sheung SH

U
Works Sum ¤p§|

TLE
ĵ NG ªù¤ TsuenPak Ko Po

(S
¤Ñ¥-

HS
Ha Wan Fisherman ³ò¤ Siu Hang -x ·s¶
¤p§

JH
Police EU Tsuen

UI
Post San Tsuen
Mun Hau

EK
Tin Ping Shan San Tsuen -x

PROPOSED REPROVISIONING OF EGRETRY SITES

ªF SH Wai Loi ¤j¤
Tsuen Siu Hang Kwan Tei San Tong Po
Üñ Barracks

SH
Tung Fong Tsuen Tsuen
Tai Yuen Tsuen
¤TÄ ¼ï«

EUN
LO
HO
³@¤ »AÄR

EH
KW AN
Pun Uk Tsuen LONG VALLEY IV
R ER) Tsuen

G
¶í

UN G
SAM PO SHUE Po Sheung Tsui Lai

¸ ¨
EAST RAIL LINE Tong Kok Tsuen Garden
¿³¤

MA
Hing Yan TUNGRIVER) ÂÑÀ
± (NG Kan Lung ªù TE
Tsuen «³» ÁA±

° ¨
ï DU
S Gate Tower IRI
°¨®Æ¤

CHA
Woodland ® IN
Tsuen Lookout Hok Tau Pai
¬w ¥Û¥ ·s VE

OR
Crest ER
Ma Liu Shui
ªa RI
V ªê¦

AD
U
Chau Tau ¥Û¥JÀ Shek Tsai San Tsuen R
Å San Wai

J
¥Õ¥
ªF
Sw P

O
Dills Corner Leng Fu Tei Pai

¤W

C
ROA
Pak Shek Au ¥Û´ò

K
Garden ¥Û´ ¤j

E
·s«

Y
Shek Wu

S
¥j

D
A
SHEK WU HUI San Tsuen
San Uk Tai Wo ¤jÀ

N
Kwu Tung ªQ¬

C
¯Q¾~

- ¦ª
Tsuen
ÀsÅ ¬Ó¦ TAI LENG PEI

LU
¸ ¿P Tsung Pak Long ¾

SH
Wu Nga HO
À¤
9

B
Yin Kong É ¬Ó© QUEEN'S HILL K

AM
¯ Lok Yeung
¼Ú·N «È® Pi ¤Ñ¥ Noble Hill LUNG YEUK TAU

RO
¥Ð FANLIN
·s G p Tin Ping °¨«

R
Europa Garden Hak Ka Wai el

A
HIGHWA ¤

O
ªFÂ

AD
Y

D
Estate

A
¥¬¸ KWU
in W ÆF¤
Ma Shi Po

°
D
¤jÀ

O
¤¯¹ Tung Chan TUN e Sh ¥Ã¹

R
G R ±m»
·s OAD

¨
Shau Wai e ¤j· Ling Shan ºa½÷ ºñ±
Yan Wai 9 Tai TauChoi Po un Town Hall ºaºÖ Wing Ning

·
ÅbÃ
Tsuen ¥¬¦ ¬ ¤Å

N
SAN TIN Leng g Wing FaiBelair Monte
Wing Fok
¤Ñ Court Wai

UE
¦wÀ ¥Ã¥ °t¤ « ¤W¤ô ¹

SHEUNG SHUI
Centre Centre
«Ò® Po Kat Tsai Hok Tau Wai
C Sh Sheung Shui

S
Wing Ping Valais ÆF ¥Ã¹
On Lung Tsuen Ser Res ª÷

T
Tsuen ¤ ±m¶ u Centre Regentville ªF»
i ®üÁp R
Kam Tsin ½ Choi Yuen ¦°® Estate ±½º LING HILL
±s® Wing Ning
Åï®p¤ ¹ÅÄR VE Tung Kok

N
¤j¤ CASTLE P
E
A Union Plaza Tsuen ¬y¤

TI
Casas Domingo K Grand RI Wai
Man Lun Fung Yuk Po So
Court Kwun Po

WAT
Tai Fu Tai Lau Shui Heung
¿»¥ RO Regentville
Ancestral Hall Mansion
AD ªù ³ÂÓ

N
Fan Tin ¥_°Ï ¯»À- Entrance
Áp©

SA
Ma Wat
·sÀ Tsuen ³ ±sªL North District Fanling Garden Tower
ÄQÅ Tsuen
San Lung ù The Royal Oaks Park LUEN WO HUI ³ÂÓ

MA
HADDEN HILL ÁA±
Tsuen  ¤Ó¥ ¯¨°
( KI LUN SHAN )
¤û Tai Ping
Ma Wat Wai
Tsz Tong
Lookout
ÄQÅ ¯»À ¯»À
NGAU TEI Estate ¦w¼ ¦Ñ Tsuen
«CÀ Ki Lun ¥j¬} ¥_°Ï Fanling Wai Fan Leng On Lok Tsuen Lo Wai
Tsing Lung
AD
Tsuen
KWU TUNG North District Lau ¬y¤
RO Tsuen Hospital §d« ±RÁ
RESERVOIR
Äéµ@

A
AK Ng Uk Tsuen ª Shung Him
Hop Shing PE
Wai Âù³½ªe¶

Â
À
Tong LAU SHUI HEUNG
LE « Beas River Country Club ±s¬

³
R)
ST

»
C¤ F ªa IRRIGATION RESERVOIR
CA Royal Green A
s

VE
¿é

¯
§|ÀY N
L
Sw P
¯» ¤ô

RI
³À§ Hang Tau ¹Å² IN

YUE
²Mª G
¸OÀY Ka Shing ²»µ
Luk Mei
Tsuen
Tai Po
Ching Ho Âû
Estate
¸U» Court Cheung Wah FANLING
Y Pei Tau Kai Leng H
WA Belair Villa I ¯ Estate

NG
GH °ªº¸¤ Ling Kok »

D
HI G

E
U
N ¹Åº H

A
TI ¦Ì®H Fa

H
W
ÄQÅï R

R BEAS
¥Û´ O

(S
Ka Fuk A
Mai Po Lung Y
nl SHEK AU SHAN
Shek Wu Wai ´^À SADDLE PASS M -Ü« Estate ing ¶í
Tsuen »ZÀ

K
( KI LUN SHAN AU ) A CHONG TSIN
Pang Loon Tei
Tong Hang

l
LENG PO LENG

VE
¯»À-

nne
¤s¤õÁ

N
AU ¶À±

RI

FA
½¼¤ »Z ¯ Fanling Fire Lookout
Centre WONG KONG

Tu
Ha Kung Tei PO LENG À Às
ºÖ¥ ¤þ ½¹½ SHAN
¤ LUNG SHAN
¦Ã¤ô³ §| FUK TSUEN SHAN Ping Kong ½¹½º °t¤
¹v WU TIP
¸

r
Sewage Hang Tau
¦w ¤û SHAN Wu Tip Shan
Ser Res

te
Firing
Treatment
On Po TARGET VALLEYRange Village

Wa
¥Û´ò³ Works 9
ºÑ´ò EA
Shek Wu Wai
-x Avon Park
Barracks
ST
San Tsuen ¤pê ´º² ²o´ ¶í§|
ªY² King Shing
Dawning Views R Tong Hang
Siu Hum A
Yan Court
Shing I Tung Chuen
Tsuen L
µ{¨

ô
Court µØ¤
-ð¤ Golf Course Wah Sum ©M¦X¥

LI
¤
Maple Gardens TSING KEI HANG
Tong Kung Leng ªá³£ Estate ®Ü¥J

N
Wo Hop Shek

E
Flora Plaza San Tsuen
KAT TSAI SHAN AU

¿
©M¿ ©M¦X

ü ¤
ªø Wo Hing
Wo Hop Shek
¹êÅç

ª
©÷² Tsuen Village
Cheung Lek Experimental

F
Cheong Shing
µØ©

§
Farm Court Wah Ming Estate

Å
ºß° ¹l²
Yung Shing
©M¦
¹v ½¬¶ KEI LAK TSAI Court
WO HOP SHEK

1
Firing Lin Tong Mei
Range ÁA± µe¬
Lookout Wa Mei Shan
¤EÀs§
¸²µ Kau Lung Hang
¤j ¤õ¸
The Vineyard Crematorium Lo Wai
Tai Lung
¾ô
-x ³¯« Kiu Tau
Barracks
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
¿¼ Chan Uk Po
½¬¶í§
¯E
Gallant
TSIU KENG Lin Tongºq½
Mei
Garden
Tsoi Yuen
The Green
¿¼®| ´º¥ ¤EÀs§

AD
¤
¼ Tsiu Keng Tribute Kau Lung Hang ¤EÀs

RO
§¸
¦Ã¤ô³ Âo¤ Lo Wai Garden San Wai
Sewage Treatment CLOUDY HILL
Water Treatment Works ¿¼®| ÁÚº¸
Works ( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
Tsiu Keng Miami Crescent ¤¸

M
«nµ

A
Yuen Leng
Pang Uk

K
©M¦X¥ Nam Wa Po
¿¼®| Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
Tsiu Keng

N
FA
TA

ne
San Wai

ÀsÅ

li
¤û¼

pe
SHU HA
Àç

Pi
NGAU TAM MEI Ying Pun

A
NG

À
»
¤j

¯
Tai Wo
¿é¤ô ®õ¦ë¦
Water Tai Hang
Tunne ®õ¦ë¯
l Fui Sha Wai
¿é Tai Hang
¤ô Tsz Tong ®õ¦ë¤
Tsuen

0
1
0 LUNG YEUK TAU
±N¨ü¼vÅTªº ¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN

EXISTING EGRETRY TO BE AFFECTED

0
6
3
NGTUN
¤åÀA G
RI
MA VE
NKAMT R
OROAD ±
ï
®
¯»

s
e
R
e ¤
FANLING

S t
r
°
FA ¯
N
¤W LEN »
G À
SHEUNG SHUI LAU -
RO ¼Ö·
AD KYPR
I OAD
O
L

°¨·
KEYCLUBROA
OC
J D

-WAY
¥Û´ ÀI
GH
SHEK WU HUI » H
¯LI
NG

9
¯»À FAN
¤W¤ A
F NLN
IGSTATO
IN
Âù³

NGSHUISTATO
IN
SHEU
SHEU
NG YUE RI

2
5
9
VE

6
1
R

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï²Ä¤@´Á¦a½L¥-¾
PWP ITEM NO. 759CL
FIRST STAGE OF SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN (FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA)
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0063_FLN_E26\CDNKFNZ0063_FLN.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó2 ªþ ANNEX 2 TO ENCLOSURE 2

LEGEND ¹Ï¨
BOUNDARY OF PROPOSED LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK
ÀÀijÜñ-ì¦ÛµM
BIODIVERSITY ZONE (ABOUT 20.9HA) VISITOR CENTRE

¥ÍºA«O¨|°Ï°ì (¬ù ¹C«È

AGRICULTURE ZONE (ABOUT 11.0HA)

¹A·~°Ï°ì (¬ù11
FOOTBRIDGE
VISITOR ZONE (ABOUT 4.8HA)
¦æ¤H
¹C«È°Ï°ì (¬ù4

4
3

APPROX. GROSS
2

KEY FEATURES FLOOR AREA (M) FUNCTIONS

¥D-n ¤j¬ù¼Ó- ¥Î
(¥-¤è

BIRDHIDE (SEE INSET) FOR BIRD-WATCHING

1
Æ[³¾«Î (¨ 65 Æ[½à

TREATMENT WETLAND SERVE AS EXHIBITION WETLAND AND

2
TREATMENT OF INCOMING WATER QUALITY
²b¤Æ
5 290 FOR IRRIGATION USE

´£¨Ñ®i¥Ü©ÊªºÀã¦a¤Î³B²z

FARMERS' FORUM VENUE FOR EVENT AND MARKET FOR

3
LVNP PRODUCES
¹A 2 050
¬¡°Ê¦aÂI¤Î®i¥ÜÜñ-ì¦Ûµ

LODGING FACILITIES REST LODGE FOR ELIGIBLE FARMERS TO

4 (56 UNITS IN TOTAL) FACILITATE THEIR FIELD OPERATIONS
15(PER UNIT) AND CROP MANAGEMENT IN LVNP
¯d±J³]¬I(¦@
15(¨C-Ó³ ´£¨Ñ¥ð®§±J³B¤©¦X¸ê®æ
Üñ-ì¦ÛµM¥ÍºA¤½¶é¤ºªº

KEY FEATURES IN VISITOR ZONE ¹C«È°Ï°ì

INSET - BIRDHIDE ´¡¹Ï-Æ

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï²Ä¤@´Á¦a½L¥-¾
PWP ITEM NO. 759CL
FIRST STAGE OF SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN OF PROPOSED LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0064_E26\CDNKFNZ0064.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó2 ª ANNEX 3 TO ENCLOSURE 2
LONG VALLE
Tong Kok
µø B
VIEW B Üñ
ÀÀij¦æ ÀÀijÜñ-ì¦ÛµM¥Í LONG VALLEY

PROPOSED FOOTBRIDGE PROPOSED VISITOR CENTRE FOR

LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK µø A
VIEW A

Kwu Tung
¿P
¿P
Yin Kong
YIN KONG

FANLIN
G HIGHWA
Y

¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN

µø A
VIEW A

ÀÀijÜñ-ì¦ÛµM¥Í
PROPOSED VISITOR ZONE FOR ÀÀij¦æ
PROPOSED FOOTBRIDGE
LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK

µø B
VIEW B

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï²Ä¤@´Á¦a½L¥-¾ã©M°ò
PWP ITEM NO. 759CL
FIRST STAGE OF SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
ARTISTIC IMPRESSION OF PROPOSED VISITOR CENTRE FOR LONG VALLEY NATURE PARK
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0065_E26\CDNKFNZ0065.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 Enclosure 3

HEAD 707 – NEW TOWNS AND URBAN AREA DEVELOPMENT

Civil Engineering – Land development

7828CL – Remaining phase of site formation and engineering

infrastructure works at Kwu Tung North new development area
and Fanling North new development area

PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE

The part of 7828CL (the “Detailed Design”), which we propose to

upgrade to Category A, comprises –

(a) detailed design of the works described in paragraph 4 (a) to (c)

below;

(b) studies including the land use review of six sites in Kwu Tung
North (“KTN”) New Development Area (“NDA”) and Fanling
North (“FLN”) NDA with land use changes due to the latest
development, as shown on the layout plans at Annex 1 to this
Enclosure;

(c) associated site investigation works as well as supervision; and

(d) preparation of tender documents and assessment of tenders for

the works described in paragraph 4 (a) to (c) below.

2. Layout plans showing the proposed study area and preliminary scope
of works are at Annex 1 to this Enclosure.

3. Subject to funding approval of the Finance Committee (“FC”) of the

Legislative Council (“LegCo”), we plan to commence the Detailed Design in the
second half of 2019, targeting to enable the proposed works under the remainder
of 7828CL (the “Remaining Phase Works”) to be ready for commencement in
2024 so as to expedite land and housing supply.

4. We will retain the remainder of 7828CL for the construction of the

Remaining Phase Works in Category B. Funding for the remainder of 7828CL
will be sought to dovetail with the implementation programme of the Remaining
Phase of the KTN and FLN NDAs. The scope of the Remaining Phase Works
mainly covers –
 (a) site formation of about 247 hectares of land (including soil
treatment works) in the KTN and FLN NDAs for housing,
community, commercial and other developments as well as
engineering infrastructure;

(b) engineering infrastructure works including Fanling Bypass

(Western Section), Po Shek Wu Road Flyover, new
interchanges together with widening of Fanling Highway for
connection with KTN NDA, local roads, drainage, sewerage,
waterworks, pumping stations, fresh water and flushing water
service reservoirs, and landscaping works; and

(c) implementing the environmental mitigation measures for the

works mentioned in (a) to (b) above.

JUSTIFICATION

5. We are determined to press ahead with the implementation of the KTN

and FLN NDAs as a medium and long-term measure to increase land supply.
Upon full development, the KTN and FLN NDAs will yield a total of about 71
800 housing units (of which about 48 500 or nearly 70% are public housing),
accommodating a new population of about 188 100; and also about 868 000
square metres (m2) floor area for economic activities, generating some 40 100
employment opportunities 1.

6. The KTN and FLN NDAs will be implemented in two phases: First
Phase and Remaining Phase. The First Phase of the NDAs development
comprise the Advance Works (i.e. 7747CL) and the First Stage Works (i.e.
7759CL), for which we are seeking funding approval with a view to commencing
construction of the First Phase of the NDAs development in the second half of
2019 for first population intake in 2023. The Detailed Design will cover the
design and associated site investigation for the Remaining Phase Works. The
Remaining Phase Works will support -

(a) residential developments with about 50 800 flats, of which

about 30 500 flats are public housing, for a new population
of about 135 200; and

1
The total employment opportunities of 40 100 include those to be generated from the planned
“government, institution or community” uses.

2
 (b) commercial uses, business and technology park, and
research and development uses with about 765 500 m2 floor
area, creating about 29 600 employment opportunities 2.

7. While we are taking forward the First Phase development, we should,

in parallel, undertake the Detailed Design for the Remaining Phase so as to
confirm, amongst others, the scope of works and land resumption limits, as well
as to complete the required statutory and administrative procedures as early as
possible to advance land production for housing, community and other
developments under the Remaining Phase. There are also strong calls from the
stakeholders for expediting land resumption and clearance for the remaining
phases of KTN and FLN NDAs development during the public engagement
activities for the unified and enhanced general ex-gratia compensation and
rehousing (C&R) arrangement for government development clearance exercises
(the “unified and enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement”). Speeding up the
implementation of the Remaining Phase Works could help addressing such
demand.

8. There are six sites in the two NDAs which are subject to land use
review resulting from the latest development. They include four sites to be freed
up upon relocation of existing/planned police facilities to Kong Nga Po and other
two sites which are no longer required for the originally planned use 3. We need
to identify at early stage the possible use of these sites so as to optimise their
development potential and start early the design of the respective supporting
infrastructure works under the Detailed Design.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

9. We estimate the capital cost of the Detailed Design and associated site
investigation works to be $764.5 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices.

2
The employment opportunities of 29 600 exclude those to be generated from the planned
“government, institution or community” uses for which the breakdown by phases is not available.
3
With the co-location of the police facilities at a site in Kong Nga Po (the KNP Site), two
“Government, Institution or Community” sites originally reserved in FLN Planning Area 3 for
reprovisioning the police facilities at Fan Garden and two sites in KTN Planning Areas 2 and 3 currently
occupied by the firing range and helipad facilities could be released for other uses. The land use of a site
adjoining the existing firing ranges and helipad in KTN originally reserved for “research and
development” uses is proposed to be reviewed in connection with the relocation of the firing ranges and
helipad. A site in FLN Planning Area 5 originally reserved for the facilities of environmental friendly
transport system is also proposed to be reviewed.

3
PUBLIC CONSULTATION

10. The draft Outline Zoning Plans (“OZPs”) for the KTN and FLN NDAs
were exhibited for public inspection under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap.
131) from 20 December 2013 to 20 February 2014. During the statutory
planning process, a total of more than 53 000 representations and comments were
received. After giving consideration to the representations and comments in
April 2015, the Town Planning Board decided not to propose any amendments to
the draft OZPs to meet the representations. On 16 June 2015, the Chief
Executive in Council approved the KTN and FLN OZPs, which were then
exhibited for public inspection on 19 June 2015.

11. Following the announcement of the unified and enhanced ex-gratia

C&R arrangement on 10 May 2018, we briefed the LegCo and local stakeholders
(such as relevant District Councils, Rural Committees) as well as the clearees
(including residents’ groups and concern groups) affected by key development
clearance exercises in the pipeline (including the KTN and FLN NDAs) on
various occasions regarding the C&R arrangement as well as major concerns in
relation to the NDAs from May 2018 to January 2019. On 14 June 2018, the
North District Council (NDC) was consulted on and supported the unified and
enhanced ex-gratia C&R arrangement and the implementation of the KTN and
FLN NDAs, including the proposed Detailed Design for Remaining Phase.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

12. The Detailed Design is not a designated project under the

Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap. 499) and will not
generate adverse environmental impacts. An Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) conducted under the North East New Territories NDAs Planning and
Engineering Study (“NENT NDAs Study”) 4 was approved with conditions under
the EIAO in October 2013 and the relevant Environmental Permits for
construction and operation were issued in November 2013. We will take into
account the relevant approval conditions and relevant recommendations in the
EIA report during the Detailed Design.

13. The proposed site investigation works will only generate very little
construction waste. We will require the consultant to fully consider measures to

4
The North East New Territories New Development Areas Planning and Engineering Study was a
planning and engineering study to establish a planning and development framework for the KTN, FLN and
Ping Che/Ta Kwu Ling NDAs.

4
minimise the generation of construction waste and to reuse/recycle construction
waste as much as possible during construction stage.

LAND ACQUISITION

14. The Detailed Design will not require any land acquisition. The details
and scope of land acquisition for the Remaining Phase of the NDAs development
will be ascertained in the Detailed Design.

HERITAGE IMPLICATIONS

15. We have completed a cultural heritage assessment under the EIA for
the NENT NDAs. It concluded that the proposed works would not affect any
heritage site, i.e. all declared monuments, proposed monuments, graded historic
sites/buildings and Government historic sites identified by the Antiquities and
Monuments Office (AMO). However, the site investigation works may affect
the Site of Archaeological Interest identified by the AMO at Sheung Shui Wa
Shan. When the details for the proposed site investigation works in the
concerned site are formulated, we will require the contractors to conduct an
Archaeological Impact Assessment to determine the need for archaeological
follow up actions in the impacted area before commencement of any site
investigation works according to the EIA report. For areas with medium
archaeological potential identified during the EIA study which may be affected by
the site investigation works, we will also conduct the assessment before
commencement of any site investigation works, and recommend mitigation
measures if necessary, according to the EIA report.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

16. We upgraded 7828CL to Category B in September 2018.

17. The Detailed Design will not involve any tree removal or planting
proposals. We will take into consideration the need for tree preservation, and
formulate tree preservation, removal, compensatory and new planting proposals in
the Detailed Design. Such proposals, if required, will be implemented under the
Remaining Phase Works.

Development Bureau
Civil Engineering and Development Department
January 2019

5
 ªþ¥ó3 ªþ¿ý1 (2±i¹ ANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
Chuk
¦Ë
Yuen

WONG MAU HANG

SHAN
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Leachate
¬û

R
Treatment Works

E
V
KONG YIU

I
R
¹Ï

N
»ÉÆ

E
°ï¶

H
TUNG LO

NZ
Landfill
ĵ HANG

E
H
Police Post
ªF- ©ù

S
¸û¼ TUNG FUNG NGONG TONG
Kaw Liu AU
Village
¦
¤ì´ò ² `
Muk Wu
ĵ Às§
°t¤ ĵ
Police Post LUNG MEI
©â¤ Ser Res PoliceNga Yiu
Pumping
Post
¥´¹ª ²À TENG
S (P
Station
Ta Kwu Kan
Ling Tau Wai GA
Village
N
GE
IN R)
¥ËŽ ¥Û¹
¤ì IVE
R G YUENR Nga Yiu Ha SHEK TSAI HA
VE

LEGEND:
Muk Wu
RI
¦Ñ¹
ĵ
Police
¤åÀ LO SHUE LING
¥´¹

¥
Post MAN KAM TO
TA KWU LING ¤ô¤

-
¶í SHUI NGAU TSO

-
Tong Fong
»ñ° ¥Û
¥Ý®
Fung Wong Wu SHEK O Wo Keng Shan
¶g¥ ĵ
Police Post ©W
Chow Tin Tsuen
Ping Yeung
«n §õ ¤ô
·s« T

183
NAM HANG Lei Uk
Ä®´ San Uk Ling ¸ Shui Hau
HOO HOK WAI Ò
¶êÀ ¹
ä

A
¤j¨ YUEN LENG
Ã

R
CHAI ĵ

I
TA SHA LOK ª@¥

V
Police

E
¤

P
Sing Ping Village

R
Post

IN
¥j¬}¥_·sµ

GA
N

G
G
E
S
Sandy Ridge Cemetery
¨FÀ-

HC
(

E
P
E

±
G

I
D

N
F I Cheung Shan Monastery

G
R
¨D Y O
RA

YUE
D
ÂùÉÓ

D
±o¤ ù N

OA
®Æ LECKY PASS A

N
Tak Yuet Lau Lo Wu

R
Liu Pok S
®£À

Lo
( SEUNG MA ¥´¹ªÀ

ù

IV
LEI YUE ) ĵ ¬û¥ Ta Kwu Ling Farm

TO

E
Police KONG NGA PO HUNG LUNG

R)
Wu
ĵ Post HANG

©
¤j®

± ï

M
Police
ù

KA

W
Post Tai Po Tin ªø
¥

à
CHEUNG SHAN
LO WU ¤ô¬

N
-

MA
¨F ©W
¿ß Shui Lau Hang
ª

BOUNDARY OF KWU TUNG NORTH

Sha Ling STAG HILL

e
Ping Che
¥Û

n
ĵ

RIV

li
Police Post SHEK MA

pe
©Wà|

ER
«H¸q

i
el Ping Che

P
Lutheran ¤j¥ ¤ô unn

ï
é New Village

IND
¿ T

É
New Village CREST HILL
r °t¤

(NG

¾
¤û¨ ( TAI SHEK MO )
te

US
Wa
Ser Res ¤W¤s °t¤
HORN HILL ĵ Ser Res
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Police ¹v Sheung Shan

TUNG
Post ®à (ªø¨j Firing Range Kai Wat ±Òª

183
ÅÂÀ ¤U¤s ¥ÕÅ
TABLE HILL Kai Fong ¾î¤s¸
¸¨°¨¬wª Ha Shan PAK HOK

NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

RIVE
Tse Koo °¨¯óà ( CHEUNG PO TAU )
SHAN Garden Wang Shan Keuk
LOK MA CHAU LOOP Hang Ma Tso Lung
µÚ §ü Kai Wat
San Tsuen
Ngam Pin CHAM SHAN ¤j¬

R)
San Tsuen
ù´ò¤À TAI HOM TUK
°¨¯ Lo Wu Classification Range
±ÆÀ ¬õ¾ô
MA ryTSO LUNG
©W VERNON PASS
Âo¤ Hung Kiu
in
e
da ( PAI TAU LO ) l¥Õ¥Ð
PING HANG n Water Treatment San Tsuen pe
u ªê¦a Pi Pak Tin
Works
Bo ù´òà ¾É À- New Village
Ma Mei Ha
Lo Wu Leng Tsai
Correctional Institution N
A ¹p¤

®
¤jà FU H
Q

· s
ea ¹v
TEI µØ S CAT HILL ¾î ¨
TAI LAW HAU Ar Firing AU ROAD ¾É
WA SHAN ¿é¤ ª G WANG LENG Y
Range
ne ¤W¤ô ô À
Pipeli UN F

²
¸¨°
¤UÆ »ñ± ·s³ò/¤jÀ S ¤Õ
Ha Wan
¸¨° d FUNG KONG SHAN
Sheung Shui Water T
Tunnel
Hung Leng
¨ ²À
e Wa Shan San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range Kan Tau Tsuen
¸¨° Tsuen LOK MA CHAU os ªQ

ÀÀij¸Ô²Ó³]-p¤¤ªì¨B-p¹
Ma Chau Cl Tsung Yuen µR¤û
Lok °¨À RI
¸¨° ¤W °ª® VE
HIGH HILL LAMB HILL -x¦ R
ÅK ªe ( MA TAU LENG ) §d« JHELUM
Lok Ma r Kwan Tei North Ko Po North D

R O AD
¤

¥Û¤
e Tit Hang OA Ng Uk Tsuen ¤¦¦Ë§
Chau
t
i R ¦
Ãä ¤ Tan Chuk Hang
¹Ò on K Lo Wai
¸T r ¤å» ¤U¥ KO
F

HE U NG
·à¦
Ha Pak Tsuen
¤W U

LOK MA CHAU
Man Kok
TA °ª®

RI
ÁA± »ñ ªe¤ Village DUKES HILL

VE
Ho Sheung ¦Ã¤ô³ ¤¤¤ KO PO SHAN ( SZE TEI SHAN )
Lookout Fung Kong ¤W¥

R
Sewage Treatment Chung LAU
A
Heung SHEUNG SHUI °ª

S
¤UÆWº® Sheung SH

U
Works Sum ¤p§|

T
ĵ G

LE
N ªù¤ TsuenPak Ko Po

(S
¤Ñ¥-

HS
Ha Wan Fisherman ³ò¤ Siu Hang -x ·s¶
¤p§

JHE
Police EU Tsuen

UI
Post San Tsuen
Mun Hau
ªF Tin Ping Shan San Tsuen -x San Tong Po

°¨¯
SH

K
Wai Loi ¤j¤
Tsuen Siu Hang Kwan Tei

TENTATIVE ROAD SCHEME AND ASSOCIATED WORKS

Üñ Barracks

SHEU
Tung Fong Tsuen Tsuen
O Tai Yuen Tsuen
¤TÄ ¼ï«

LO
H
³@¤ »AÄR

EH
KW AN
NG
Pun Uk Tsuen LONG VALLEY IV
R ER) Tsuen

K
¶í

UN G
SAM PO SHUE Po Sheung Tsui Lai

NG TUNG

¸ ¨
EAST RAIL LINE Tong Kok Tsuen Garden
¿³¤

MA
Hing Yan TUNGRIVER) ÂÑÀ
± (NG Kan Lung ªù T
Tsuen «³» EI ÁA±

° ¨
ï DU
S Gate Tower
°¨®Æ¤ RI

CH
Woodland ® IN
Tsuen Lookout Hok Tau Pai
¬w ¥Û¥ ·s VE

OR
Ma Liu Shui

AU
ªa Crest ER
V ªê¦
RI

AD
Chau Tau ¥Û¥JÀ Shek Tsai San Tsuen R
Å San Wai

JO
¥Õ¥ Sw P Fu Tei Pai
ªF Dills Corner Leng

C
ROAD
Pak Shek Au ¥Û´ò

K
Garden ¥Û´ ¤j

E
·s«

Y
AREA FOR PROPOSED DETAILED DESIGN
Shek Wu

S
¥j

A
SHEK WU HUI San Tsuen
San Uk Tai Wo ¤jÀ

N
¤W
Kwu Tung ªQ¬

C
¯Q¾~

- ¦ª
Tsuen
ÀsÅ ¬Ó¦ TAI LENG PEI

L
¸ ¿P Tsung Pak Long ¾

UB
SH
Wu Nga HO
À¤
9 ¬Ó© K
Yin Kong É QUEEN'S HILL

A
¯ Lok Yeung

M
¼Ú·N «È® Pi ¤Ñ¥ Noble Hill LUNG YEUK TAU

R
¥Ð FANLIN

OA
·s G pe Tin Ping °¨«

R
Europa Garden HIGHWA Hak Ka Wai
¤

O
ªFÂ l

AD
Y

D
Estate

AD
¥¬¸ KWU
in W Ma Shi Po

°
¤jÀ ÆF¤

RO
¤¯¹ Tung Chan TUN
G R ±m»
e Sh ¥Ã¹
·s OAD

¨
Shau Wai eu ¤j· Ling Shan ºa½÷ ºñ±
Yan Wai 9 Tai TauChoi Po ºaºÖ Wing Ning

MA TSO LUNG
n Town Hall

·
ÅbÃ
Tsuen ¥¬¦ ¬ ¤Å

N
SAN TIN Leng g Wing FaiBelair Monte
Wing Fok
¤Ñ Court Wai

UE
¦wÀ ¥Ã¥ °t¤ « ¤W¤ô ¹
Centre Centre
«Ò® Po Kat Tsai Hok Tau Wai
C S Sheung Shui

S
Wing Ping Valais hu ÆF ¥Ã¹
On Lung Tsuen Ser Res ª÷

T
¤ ±m¶ Regentville ªF»

SHEUNG SHUI
Tsuen i Centre ®üÁp R
Kam Tsin ½ Choi Yuen ¦°®
Estate ±½º LING HILL
±s® E Wing Ning
Åï®p¤ ¹ÅÄR Tung Kok

N
¤j¤ CASTLE P
E
AK Union Plaza IV Tsuen ¬y¤

TI
Casas Domingo Grand R Wai
Man Lun Fung Yuk Po So
Court Kwun Po

WAT
Tai Fu Tai Lau Shui Heung
¿»¥ R Regentville
Ancestral Hall Mansion O
A ªù ³ÂÓ

N
Fan Tin D ¥_°Ï ¯»À- Entrance
Áp©

SA
Ma Wat
·sÀ Tsuen ³ ±sªL North District Fanling Garden Tower
ÄQÅ Tsuen
San Lung ù The Royal Oaks Park LUEN WO HUI ³ÂÓ

MA
HADDEN HILL ÁA±
Tsuen  ¤Ó¥ ¯¨°
( KI LUN SHAN )
¤û Tai Ping
Ma Wat Wai
Tsz Tong
Lookout
ÄQÅ ¯»À ¯»À
NGAU TEI Estate ¦w¼ ¦Ñ Tsuen
«CÀ Ki Lun ¥j¬} ¥_°Ï Fanling Wai Fan Leng On Lok Tsuen Lo Wai
Tsing Lung
AD
Tsuen
KWU TUNG North District Lau ¬y¤

ÀÀij¸Ô²Ó³]-p¤¤ªì¨B-p¹ºªº¦
RO Tsuen Hospital §d« ±RÁ
RESERVOIR
Äéµ@

A
AK Ng Uk Tsuen ª Shung Him
Hop Shing PE
Wai Âù³½ªe¶

Â
À
Tong LAU SHUI HEUNG
LE «C Beas River Country Club ±s¬

³
)
ST

»
F ªa IRRIGATION RESERVOIR

ER
CA ¤s Royal Green AN ¿é

¯
Sw P
¯»

RIV
§|ÀY L ¤ô
Hang Tau IN
³À§ ¹Å²

YUE
²Mª G
¸OÀY Ka Shing ²»µ
Luk Mei
Tsuen
Tai Po
Ching Ho Âû
Estate
¸U» Court Cheung Wah FANLING
Y Pei Tau Kai Leng H
WA Belair Villa IG ¯ Estate

G
GH °ªº¸¤ Ling Kok »

D
HI

UN
HE
N ¹Åº H

A
TI ¦Ì®H W F
ÄQÅï R an

R BEAS
¥Û´ O

S
Ka Fuk A SHEK AU SHAN

(
Mai Po Lung Y l
Shek Wu Wai ´^À SADDLE PASS M -Ü« Estate in
g ¶í
Tsuen »ZÀ

K
A CHONG TSIN
Pang Loon Tei ( KI LUN SHAN AU )
Tong Hang

el
LENG PO LENG

TENTATIVE SITE FORMATION SCHEME AND

E
¯»À-

¥j¬}¥_·
¤s¤õÁ

N
AU ¶À±

nn

FA
½¼¤ »Z ¯ Fanling Fire Lookout

R
Centre WONG KONG

Tu
Ha Kung Tei PO LENG À Às
ºÖ¥ ¤þ ½¹½ SHAN
¤ LUNG SHAN
¦Ã¤ô³ §| FUK TSUEN SHAN Ping Kong ½¹½º °t¤
¹v WU TIP
¸

ter
Sewage Hang Tau
¦w ¤û Firing SHAN Wu Tip Shan
Ser Res
Treatment
On Po TARGET VALLEYRange Village

Wa
¥Û´ò³ Works 9
ºÑ´ò EA
Shek Wu Wai
-x Avon Park
Barracks
ST
San Tsuen ¤pê ´º² ²o´ ¶í§|
ªY² King Shing Dawning Views R Tong Hang
Siu Hum A

ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS

Court
Yan Shing I Tung Chuen
Tsuen L
µ{¨

ô
Court µØ¤
-ð¤ Golf Course

KWU TUNG NORTH

Wah Sum ©M¦X¥

LI
¤
Maple Gardens TSING KEI HANG
Tong Kung Leng ªá³£ Estate ®Ü¥J

NE
Wo Hop Shek

é
Flora Plaza San Tsuen
KAT TSAI SHAN AU

¿
©M¿ ©M¦X

ü ¤
ªø Wo Hing
Wo Hop Shek
¹êÅç

ª
©÷² Tsuen Village
Cheung Lek Experimental

F
Cheong Shing
µØ©

§
Farm Court Wah Ming Estate

Å
ºß° ¹l² ©M¦

RIVER
Yung Shing

AREA FOR PROPOSED DETAILED DESIGN NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

¹v ½¬¶ KEI LAK TSAI Court
Firing Lin Tong Mei WO HOP SHEK
Range ÁA± µe¬
Lookout Wa Mei Shan
¤EÀs§
¸²µ Kau Lung Hang
¤j ¤õ¸
The Vineyard Crematorium Lo Wai
Tai Lung
¾ô
-x ³¯« Kiu Tau
Barracks
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
¿¼ Chan Uk Po
½¬¶í§
¯E
Gallant
TSIU KENG Lin Tongºq½
Mei
Garden
Tsoi Yuen
The Green
¿¼®| ´º¥ ¤EÀs§

ROAD
¤
¼ Tsiu Keng Tribute Kau Lung Hang ¤EÀs
§¸
¦Ã¤ô³ Âo¤ Lo Wai Garden San Wai
Sewage Treatment CLOUDY HILL
Water Treatment Works ¿¼®| ÁÚº¸
Works ( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
Tsiu Keng Miami Crescent ¤¸

M
«nµ

KA
Yuen Leng
Pang Uk
©M¦X¥ Nam Wa Po
¿¼®| Wo Hop Shek Cemetery

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²Ä747CL¸¹¤Î759CL
Tsiu Keng

N
FA
TAM

e
San Wai

in
¤û¼

pel
SHUI HA
Àç

Pi
NGAU TAM MEI Ying Pun

A
NG

À
»
¤j

¯
Tai Wo
¿é¤ô ®õ¦ë¦

·sµo®i°Ïµo®i-p¹º«e
Water Tai Hang
Tunne ®õ¦ë¯
l Fui Sha Wai
¿é Tai Hang
¤ô Tsz Tong ®õ¦ë¤
Tsuen

PWP ITEM NOS. 747CL & 759CL- ¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN

ADVANCE WORKS AND FIRST STAGE WORKS FOR

0
DEVELOPMENT AT KWU TUNG NORTH AND

0
1
FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

¤g¦a¥Î³~§ïÅÜ
AREA OF PROPOSED RELATED STUDIES FOR SITES
WITH LAND USE CHANGE

ªF
Å
R
VE
RI

EA
»ñ ªe¤ YU
E

ST
FUNG KONG

G
134 HO SHEUNG HEUNG

RA
N
10

U
0

IL
H
S

L
Üñ

I
N
E
³
LONG VALLEY

Âù
¥Õ¥ ¸¨°¨¬
R LINE ªì¨B-p¹ºªºÄ_¥
PAK SHEK AU LOK MA CHAU SPU
TENTATIVE PO SHEK WU ROAD FLYOVER

¬
°¨ LIN
E
¸¨AU SPUR ¥j
CH Y
LOK
MA
½( ¦{À KWU TUNG
¿P
«C ¤ AD 16
K RO
9
A YIN KONG
CASTLE PE )
U TAU
A
(CH ¥¬
¸ KWU TU
NG ROA
D
¯»¤½
¥Õ¥Û¥W FANLING HI 9
GH
PAK SHEK AU INTERCHANGE WA
ªì¨B-p¹ºªº Y
ªì¨B-p¹ºªº¯ TENTATIVE KWU TUNG INTERCHANGE
TENTATIVE WIDENING OF FANLING HIGHWAY
1
0
0

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï¾l¤U¦a½L¥-¾ã
PWP ITEM NO. 828CL
REMAINING PHASE OF SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN (KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA)
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0046_KTN_E19\CDNKFNZ0046_KTN.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 ªþ¥ó3 ªþ¿ý1 (2±i¹ ANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
Chuk
¦Ë
Yuen

WONG MAU HANG

SHAN
º¯Âo¦Ã¤
Leachate
¬û

R
Treatment Works

E
¹Ï

V
KONG YIU

I
R
N
»ÉÆ

E
°ï¶

H
TUNG LO

NZ
Landfill
ĵ HANG

E
H
Police Post
ªF- ©ù

S
¸û¼ TUNG FUNG NGONG TONG
Kaw Liu AU
Village
¦
² `

LEGEND:
¤ì´ò
Muk Wu
ĵ Às§
°t¤ ĵ
Police Post LUNG MEI

5
©â¤ Ser Res PoliceNga Yiu
Pumping
Post
¥´¹ª ²À TENG
(P
Station NS
GE ¥ËŽ ¥Û¹
Ta Kwu Kan
Ling Tau Wai GA
Village IN R)
¤ì IVE
R G YUENR Nga Yiu Ha SHEK TSAI HA

1
Muk Wu VE
RI
¦Ñ¹
ĵ
Police
¤åÀ LO SHUE LING
¥´¹

¥
1
Post MAN KAM TO
TA KWU LING ¤ô¤

-
¶í SHUI NGAU TSO

-
Tong Fong
»ñ° ¥Û
¥Ý®
Fung Wong Wu SHEK O Wo Keng Shan
¶g¥ ĵ
©W

¯»À-¥_·sµ
Police Post
Chow Tin Tsuen
Ping Yeung
«n §õ ¤ô
NAM HANG ·s« T Lei Uk
Ä®´ San Uk Ling ¸ Shui Hau

¯»À-¥_·
HOO HOK WAI Ò
¶êÀ ¹
ä

A
¤j¨ YUEN LENG
Ã

R
CHAI ĵ

I
TA SHA LOK ª@¥

VE
Police

PI
Sing Ping Village

R
Post

GNG

NG
A
ES
Sandy Ridge Cemetery
¨FÀ-

HC
BOUNDARY OF FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

(P

E
E
G

IN
D
F I Cheung Shan Monastery

FANLING NORTH

G
R
¨D Y O
RA

YUE
D
ÂùÉÓ

D
±o¤ ù N

OA
®Æ LECKY PASS A

N
Tak Yuet Lau Lo Wu

RI
Liu Pok S
®£À

Lo
( SEUNG MA ¥´¹ªÀ

ù
LEI YUE ) ĵ ¬û¥

V
Ta Kwu Ling Farm

TO

E
Police KONG NGA PO HUNG LUNG

R
Wu

)
ĵ Post HANG

©
¤j®

± ï

M
Police
ù

KA
ªø

W
Post Tai Po Tin
¥

à
CHEUNG SHAN

NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA

LO WU ¤ô¬

N
-

MA
¨F ©W
¿ß Shui Lau Hang
ª STAG HILL

5
Sha Ling

e
Ping Che
¥Û

in
ĵ

RI

l
Police Post SHEK MA

VE

pe
ÀÀij¸Ô²Ó³]-p¤¤ªì¨B-p¹
©Wà|
«H¸q

Pi
3
¤j¥ el Ping Che
Lutheran ¤ô unn New Village

IN
¿é T

É
New Village CREST HILL
r °t¤

DU
(N

¾
¤û¨ ( TAI SHEK MO )
te Ser Res °t¤
Wa ¤W¤s

S
G
HORN HILL ĵ Ser Res
( NGAU KOK SHAN )
Police ¹v Sheung Shan

TUN
Post ®à (ªø¨j Firing Range Kai Wat ±Òª
ÅÂÀ ¤U¤s ¥ÕÅ
TABLE HILL Kai Fong ¾î¤s¸

GRIV
¸¨°¨¬wª Tse Koo °¨¯óà ( CHEUNG PO TAU ) Ha Shan PAK HOK
Garden Wang Shan Keuk
§ü Kai Wat SHAN
LOK MA CHAU LOOP Hang Ma Tso Lung
µÚ San Tsuen
¤j¬

ER
Ngam Pin CHAM SHAN
San Tsuen

TENTATIVE ROAD SCHEME AND ASSOCIATED WORKS AREA FOR PROPOSED DETAILED DESIGN
ù´ò¤À

)
TAI HOM TUK
°¨¯ Lo Wu Classification Range
±ÆÀ ¬õ¾ô
MA ryTSO LUNG
©W a VERNON PASS
Âo¤ Hung Kiu
in
e
d ( PAI TAU LO ) l¥Õ¥Ð
PING HANG n Water Treatment San Tsuen pe
o
u Works ªê¦a Pi Pak Tin
B ù´òà ¾É À- New Village
Ma Mei Ha
Lo Wu Leng Tsai
Correctional Institution
a FU H
AN ¹p¤
¤jà Q

· s
e ¹v
µØ S CAT HILL ¾î ¨
r TEI
TAI LAW HAU A Firing AU ROAD ¾É
WA SHAN ¿é ª WANG LENG Y
Range
ne
¤ô NG À
Pipeli ¤W¤ô U F

²
¤UÆ »ñ± ·s³ò/¤jÀ S ¤Õ
¸¨° d Sheung Shui Water T
Tunnel ¨ ²À

¸¨°
Ha Wan FUNG KONG SHAN Hung Leng
e Wa Shan San Wai / Tai Ling Firing Range Kan Tau Tsuen
¸¨° Tsuen LOK MA CHAU s
o ªQ
l
Ma Chau C Tsung Yuen µR¤û °¨À

ÀÀij¸Ô²Ó³]-p¤¤ªì¨B-p¹ºª
Lok RI
W VE
¸¨° ¤ HIGH HILL LAMB HILL -x¦ °ª® R
ÅK e JHELUM
Lok Ma r ª ( MA TAU LENG )
Kwan Tei North Ko Po North D §d«

R OAD
A ¤

¥ Û¤
e Tit Hang O Ng Uk Tsuen ¤¦¦Ë§
Chau
t
i R ¦
Ãä n ¤ Tan Chuk Hang
¹Ò o K Lo Wai
¸T r ¤å» ¤U¥ KO
F

HEUNG
·à¦
Ha
Man Kok Pak Tsuen
¤W TA
U °ª®

RIV
ªe¤

LOK MA CHAU
ÁA± »ñ Village DUKES HILL
Ho Sheung ¦Ã¤ô³ ¤¤¤ KO PO SHAN ( SZE TEI SHAN )

ER
Lookout Fung Kong ¤W¥
Sewage Treatment Chung LAU
A
Heung SHEUNG SHUI °ª

SUT
¤UÆWº® Works Sum
Sheung ¤p§| SH
ĵ

LE
NG ªù¤ TsuenPak Ko Po

(SH
¤Ñ¥-

HS
Ha Wan Fisherman

TENTATIVE SITE FORMATION SCHEME AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS

³ò¤ Siu Hang ¤p§ -x ·s¶

J
Police EU Tsuen

UI
Post San Tsuen
Mun Hau

EK
ªF SH Wai Loi Tin Ping Shan San Tsuen -x Kwan Tei San Tong Po
¤j¤
Tsuen Siu Hang
Üñ Barracks

SH
Tung Fong Tsuen Tsuen
Tai Yuen Tsuen
¤TÄ ¼ï«

EUN
LOK
HO
³@¤ »AÄR

EH
KW AN
Pun Uk Tsuen LONG VALLEY IV
R ER) Tsuen

G
¶í

UN G
SAM PO SHUE Po Sheung Tsui Lai

¸ ¨
EAST RAIL LINE Tong Kok Tsuen Garden
¿³¤

MA
Hing Yan TUNGRIVER) ÂÑÀ
± (NG Kan Lung ªù T
Tsuen «³» E ÁA±

° ¨
ï DU
S Gate Tower IR
°¨®Æ¤

CHA
Woodland ® IN
Tsuen IV Lookout Hok Tau Pai
¬w ¥Û¥

AREA FOR PROPOSED DETAILED DESIGN

·s

OR
Crest Ma Liu Shui ER
ªa RI
ER
V ªê¦

AD
U
Chau Tau ¥Û¥JÀ Shek Tsai San Wai San Tsuen
Å

J
¥Õ¥ Sw P

OC
ªF Dills Corner Leng Fu Tei Pai

¤W

ROA
Pak Shek Au ¥Û´ò

KE
Garden ¥Û´ ·s« ¤j

Y
Shek Wu

SA
¥j

D
SHEK WU HUI San Tsuen
San Uk Tai Wo ¤jÀ

N
Kwu Tung ªQ¬

C
¯Q¾~

- ¦ª
Tsuen
ÀsÅ ¬Ó¦ TAI LENG PEI

L
¸ ¿P Tsung Pak Long ¾

U
SH
Wu Nga HO
À¤
9

B
Yin Kong É ¬Ó© QUEEN'S HILL K

AM
¯ Lok Yeung
¼Ú·N «È® P ¤Ñ¥ Noble Hill LUNG YEUK TAU

RO
¥Ð FANLIN i
·s G pe Tin Ping °¨«

RO
Europa Garden Hak Ka Wai

A
HIGHWA ¤
ªFÂ li

AD
Y

D
Estate

AD
¥¬¸ KWU W ÆF¤
Ma Shi Po

°
¤jÀ ne

RO
¤¯¹ Tung Chan TUN
G R ±m» Sh ¥Ã¹
·s OAD

¨
Shau Wai e ¤j· Ling Shan ºa½÷ ºñ±
Yan Wai 9 Tai TauChoi Po u Town Hall ºaºÖ Wing Ning

·
ÅbÃ
¬ ¤Å
n Tsuen ¥¬¦

N
SAN TIN Leng g Wing FaiBelair Monte
Wing Fok
¤Ñ Court Wai

UE
¦wÀ ¥Ã¥ °t¤ « ¤W¤ô ¹

SHEUNG SHUI
Centre Centre
«Ò® Po Kat Tsai Hok Tau Wai
C S Sheung Shui

S
Wing Ping Valais h ÆF ¥Ã¹
On Lung Tsuen Ser Res ª÷

T
Tsuen ¤ ±m¶ ui Centre Regentville ªF»
½ Choi Yuen ¦°®
Estate LING HILL ®üÁp ERWing Ning
¹ÅÄR Kam Tsin ±½º ±s®

ÀÀij¸Ô²Ó³]-p¤¤ªì¨B-p
Åï®p¤ Tung Kok

N
¤j¤ CASTLE P
E Union Plaza ¬y¤
A IV Tsuen

TI
0

4
Casas Domingo K Grand R Wai
Man Lun Fung Yuk Po So
Court Kwun Po

WAT
Tai Fu Tai Lau Shui Heung
¿»¥ RO Regentville
Ancestral Hall Mansion
AD ªù ³ÂÓ

N
Fan Tin ¥_°Ï ¯»À- Entrance
Áp©

A
0
Ma Wat
±sªL

S
·sÀ Tsuen ÄQÅ ³ North District Fanling Garden Tower

6
Tsuen
San Lung ù The Royal Oaks Park LUEN WO HUI ³ÂÓ

MA
HADDEN HILL ÁA±
 ¯¨°

1
Tsuen ¤Ó¥
( KI LUN SHAN )
¤û Tai Ping
Ma Wat Wai
Tsz Tong
Lookout
ÄQÅ ¯»À ¯»À ¦w¼ ¦Ñ

1
«CÀ Ki Lun
NGAU TEI Estate Tsuen
¥j¬} ¥_°Ï Fanling Wai Fan Leng On Lok Tsuen Lo Wai
Tsing Lung
AD
Tsuen
KWU TUNG North District Lau ¬y¤
RO Tsuen Hospital §d« ±RÁ
RESERVOIR
Äéµ@

A
AK ª

TENTATIVE FANLING NORTH SERVICE RESERVOIRS AREA FOR PROPOSED DETAILED DESIGN
Ng Uk Tsuen Shung Him
Hop Shing PE
Wai Âù³½ªe¶

Â
À
Tong LAU SHUI HEUNG
LE «C Beas River Country Club ±s¬

³
)
ST

»
FA ªa IRRIGATION RESERVOIR

ER
CA ¤s Royal Green
¿é

¯
NL Sw P
¯»

RIV
§|ÀY ¤ô
³À§ Hang Tau ¹Å² ING

YUE
²Mª
¸OÀY Ka Shing ²»µ
Luk
Tsuen
Mei Tai Po
Ching Ho Âû
Estate
¸U» Court Cheung Wah FANLING
Y Pei Tau Kai Leng HI
WA Belair Villa ¯ Estate

NG
GH °ªº¸¤ Ling Kok »

D
HI G

E
U
N ¹Åº HW

A
TI ¦Ì®H F

H
ÄQÅï R an

R BEAS
¥Û´ O

(S
Ka Fuk AY
Mai Po Lung l SHEK AU SHAN
Shek Wu Wai ´^À SADDLE PASS M -Ü« Estate ing
¶í
Tsuen »ZÀ

K
( KI LUN SHAN AU ) A CHONG TSIN
Pang Loon Tei
Tong Hang

l
LENG PO LENG

E
¯»À-

ne
¤s¤õÁ

N
AU ¶À±

RI

FA
½¼¤ »Z ¯ Fanling Fire Lookout

Tun
Centre WONG KONG
Ha Kung Tei PO LENG À Às
ºÖ¥ ¤þ ½¹½ SHAN

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²Ä747CL¸¹¤Î759CL¸¹-¥j¬}¥_¤Î¯»À-¥_·
¤ LUNG SHAN
¦Ã¤ô³ §| FUK TSUEN SHAN Ping Kong ½¹½º °t¤
¹v WU TIP
¸

r
Sewage Hang Tau
¦w ¤û SHAN Wu Tip Shan
Ser Res

te
Firing
Treatment
On Po TARGET VALLEYRange Village

Wa
¥Û´ò³ Works 9
ºÑ´ò EA
Shek Wu Wai
-x Avon Park
Barracks
ST
San Tsuen ¤pê ´º² ²o´ ¶í§|
ªY² King Shing
Dawning Views RA Tong Hang
Siu Hum
Yan Court
Shing I Tung Chuen
Tsuen L
µ{¨

ô
Court µØ¤
-ð¤ Golf Course Wah Sum ©M¦X¥

L
¤
Maple Gardens TSING KEI HANG

IN
Tong Kung Leng ªá³£ Estate ®Ü¥J

PWP ITEM NOS. 747CL & 759CL- ADVANCE WORKS AND FIRST STAGE WORKS FOR
Wo Hop Shek

E
Flora Plaza San Tsuen
KAT TSAI SHAN AU

¿
©M¿ ©M¦X

ü ¤
ªø Wo Hing
Wo Hop Shek
¹êÅç

ª
©÷² Tsuen Village
Cheung Lek Experimental

F
Cheong Shing
µØ©

§
Farm Court Wah Ming Estate

Å
ºß° ¹l²
Yung Shing
©M¦
¹v ½¬¶ KEI LAK TSAI Court
WO HOP SHEK

DEVELOPMENT AT KWU TUNG NORTH AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA
Firing Lin Tong Mei
Range ÁA± µe¬
Lookout Wa Mei Shan
¤EÀs§
¸²µ Kau Lung Hang
¤j ¤õ¸
The Vineyard Crematorium Lo Wai
Tai Lung
¾ô
-x ³¯« Kiu Tau
Barracks
Yau Tam Mei San Tsuen
¿¼ Chan Uk Po
½¬¶í§
¯E
Gallant
TSIU KENG Lin Tongºq½
Mei
Garden
Tsoi Yuen
The Green
¿¼®| ´º¥ ¤EÀs§

AD
¤
¼ Tsiu Keng Tribute Kau Lung Hang ¤EÀs

RO
§¸
¦Ã¤ô³ Âo¤ Lo Wai Garden San Wai
Sewage Treatment CLOUDY HILL
Water Treatment Works ¿¼®| ÁÚº¸
Works ( KAU LUNG HANG SHAN )
Tsiu Keng Miami Crescent ¤¸

AM
Pang Uk
«nµ Yuen Leng

¤g¦a¥Î³~§ïÅÜ

K
©M¦X¥ Nam Wa Po
¿¼®| Wo Hop Shek Cemetery
Tsiu Keng

N
FA
TA

e
San Wai

in
M
¤û¼

pel
SHU HANG
Àç

Pi
NGAU TAM MEI Ying Pun

A
À
»
AREA OF PROPOSED RELATED STUDIES FOR SITES WITH LAND USE CHANGE
¤j

¯
Tai Wo
¿é¤ô ®õ¦ë¦
Water Tai Hang

5
Tunne ®õ¦ë¯
l Fui Sha Wai
¿é¤ Tai Hang
ô Tsz Tong ®õ¦ë¤
Tsuen

1
1
¦ì¸ LOCATION PLAN
ªì¨B-p¹ºªº¯»À ÀsÅ
0
1
0
TENTATIVE FANLING BYPASS LUNG YEUK TAU

0
(WESTERN SECTION)

7
3
ªì¨B-p¹ºªº

0
6
3
TENTATIVE FRESH WATER
SERVICE RESERVOIR

NG T
UN
G
RI
VE ªì¨B-p¹ºªº¨
R
± TENTATIVE FLUSHING WATER
ï
® SERVICE RESERVOIR
¯»

s
e
R
e ¤
FANLING

S t
r
°
FA ¯
N
¤W LE »
NG À
SHEUNG SHUI LA -
U
RO ¼Ö·
AD
LOK YIP ROAD
ªì¨B- °¨·
C
Ä_¥Û´ò¸ô KEY LUB ROAD
JOC
TENTATIVE PO SHEK WU
ROAD FLYOVER
¥Û´ - WAY
À GH
SHEK WU HUI » HI
¯

9
¯»À NG
NLI
¤W¤ FA
SH

ION
FANLING STAT
E

TATION
SHEUNG SHUI S
UNG YU
Âù³
E RI

¯»À-
VER

FANLING HIGHWAY
2
5
9

¤u°È-p¹º¶µ¥Ø²
¥j¬}¥_·sµo®i°Ï¤Î¯»À-¥_·sµo®i°Ï¾l¤U¦a½L¥-¾ã
PWP ITEM NO. 828CL
REMAINING PHASE OF SITE FORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS AT KWU TUNG NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA-
LAYOUT PLAN (FANLING NORTH NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA)
R:\Drawing\CSWP\KFN\DRAWING_NDO\CDNKFNZ0047_FLN_E19\CDNKFNZ0047_FLN.dgn A3 420MM X 297MM
 Enclosure 4

HEAD 707 – NEW TOWNS AND URBAN AREA DEVELOPMENT

Civil Engineering – Land development

7793CL – Site formation and infrastructure works for Police facilities in

Kong Nga Po

PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE

The proposed scope of works under 7793CL (the “KNP Works”)

comprises –

(a) formation of site at Kong Nga Po (the KNP site) with

an area of about 19 hectares for the proposed police
facilities;

(b) widening of existing Kong Nga Po Road of about 1.7

kilometres long to a 7.3 metres (m) wide single
two-lane carriageway 1 and construction of a new
vehicular bridge of about 100m long; and

(c) associated infrastructure works, including road works,

waterworks, drainage and sewerage works,
geotechnical works, landscaping works, environmental
mitigation measures, and other ancillary works.

2. Layout plans showing the proposed works are at Annexes 1 to 4 to this

Enclosure.

3. Subject to funding approval of the Finance Committee (“FC”) of the

Legislative Council (“LegCo”), we plan to commence construction of the
proposed works in the second quarter of 2019 for completion in phases from end
2021 to end 2022. To meet the works programme, the Civil Engineering and
Development Department (“CEDD”) will invite tenders for the works contract in
February 2019, but the works contract will only be awarded upon obtaining
funding approval from the FC.

JUSTIFICATION

1
Due to the need for preserving individuals of Keteleeria fortunei and other species of conservation
interest along existing Kong Nga Po Road as required under the Environmental Permit, a section of about
80 m long of existing Kong Nga Po Road would only be widened to 6.75 m wide.
4. Various police facilities are currently accommodated in different
locations in the North District - the existing Weapons Training Division and
Police Driving and Traffic Training Centre are located at Fan Garden near Sheung
Shui, while the Ma Tso Lung Firing Range and Lo Wu Firing Range together with
a helipad are standing on sites within the Kwu Tung North (“KTN”) New
Development Area (“NDA”) area. We propose co-locating these police facilities
at the KNP site near Sheung Shui so as to optimise the land uses and development
potential of KTN and Fanling North (“FLN”) NDAs. With the co-location of the
police facilities at the KNP site, two “Government, Institution or Community”
sites (Site A and Site B at Annex 4) originally reserved in FLN NDA for
reprovisioning the police facilities at Fan Garden and two sites (Site C and Site D
at Annex 4) in KTN NDA currently occupied by the firing range and helipad
facilities could be released for other uses. The KNP site will also accommodate
a new Specialist Operation Training Facility. In addition, putting together the
various police facilities at one location in the KNP site will also enhance
operational efficiency. Before proceeding with the construction of various
facilities 2 mentioned above at the KNP site, it is necessary to carry out the site
formation and infrastructure works.

5. The existing Kong Nga Po Road 3 between Man Kam To Road and the
KNP site will also be upgraded to a 7.3m wide single two-lane carriageway with
footpaths to cater for the additional traffic generated from the proposed police
facilities at the KNP site and the proposed development of Organic Resources
Recovery Centre Phase 2 at Sha Ling, North District.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

6. We estimate the capital cost of the KNP Works to be $1,913.0 million

in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

7. We consulted the District Minor Works and Environmental

Improvement Committee of the North District Council on 21 November 2016 on

2
The police facilities will be constructed by the Architectural Services Department under a separate
PWP Item.
3
The existing Kong Nga Po Road is a single two-lane carriageway with a typical road width of 6.0m
to 6.5m without footpath.

2
the proposed site formation and infrastructure works for the police facilities at the
KNP site. Members supported the proposed works.

8. The proposed road works (the “Road Scheme”) under the Roads
(Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap. 370) and the proposed sewerage
works (the “Sewerage Scheme”) under Cap. 370 as applied by section 26 of the
Water Pollution Control (Sewerage) Regulation (Cap. 358 AL) were gazetted on
29 September 2017 and 6 October 2017. During the statutory objection period,
no objections were received and the Road and Sewerage Schemes were thus
authorised accordingly. The notices of authorisation of the Road Scheme and the
Sewerage Scheme were gazetted on 12 and 19 January 2018 respectively.

9. We consulted the Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges

and Associated Structures 4 on the aesthetic design of the retaining structures and
vehicular bridge proposed in the KNP Works. The Committee accepted the
proposed aesthetic design at its meeting on 17 April 2018.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

10. The KNP Works is a designated project under Schedule 2 of the

Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (“EIAO”) (Cap. 499) and an
environmental permit (EP) is required for construction and operation. The
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for the KNP Works was
approved under the EIAO on 20 October 2016. The EP for the construction and
operation of the KNP Works was issued on 1 November 2016. The EIA report
concluded that the environmental impacts of the KNP Works can be controlled to
within the criteria under the EIAO and the Technical Memorandum on the EIA
Process.

11. We shall implement the measures recommended in the approved EIA

report, and comply with the relevant conditions under the EP. The key measures
include provision of perimeter wall / boundary wall at the KNP site, provision of
side walls at firing ranges and re-establishment of new grassland area at the KNP

4
The Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated Structures, comprising
representatives of the Hong Kong Institute of Architects, the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, the Hong
Kong Institute of Planners, the ArchSD , the Highways Department, the Housing Department, the CEDD,
and architectural or relevant faculties from local institutions, is responsible for vetting the design of
bridges and other structures associated with the highway system, including noise barriers and enclosures,
from the aesthetic and visual impact points of view.

3
site 5. We have included the cost of implementing the environmental mitigation
measures under the KNP Works in the project estimate.

12. At the planning and design stages, we have considered all the proposed
works and construction sequences to reduce generation of construction waste
where possible. In addition, we will require the contractor to reuse inert
construction waste (e.g. materials excavated within area for backfilling use) on
site under the KNP Works or in other suitable construction sites as far as possible,
in order to minimise the disposal of inert construction waste to public fill
reception facilities (PFRF) 6. We will also require the contractor to maximise the
use of recycled or recyclable inert construction waste, and encourage the use of
non-timber formwork to further reduce the generation of construction waste.

13. At the construction stage, we will require the contractor to submit for
approval a plan setting out the waste management measures, which will include
appropriate mitigation means to avoid and reduce the generation of inert
construction wastes, and to reuse and recycle such wastes. We will ensure that
the day-to-day operations on site comply with the approved plan and require the
contractor to separate the inert portion from non-inert construction waste on site to
facilitate their transportation to appropriate facilities for disposal. We will
control the disposal of inert construction waste and non-inert construction waste at
PFRF and landfills respectively for disposal through a trip-ticket system.

14. We estimate that the KNP Works will generate in total about 1 148 000
tonnes of construction waste. Of these, we will reuse about 390 000 tonnes
(34.0%) of inert construction waste on site and deliver 752 000 tonnes (65.5%) of
inert construction waste to other construction sites for reuse or to PFRF for
subsequent reuse. We will dispose of the remaining 6 000 tonnes (0.5%) of
non-inert construction waste at landfills. The total cost for accommodating
construction waste at PFRF and landfill sites is estimated to be $54.6 million for
the proposed works (based on a unit charge rate of $71 per tonne for disposal at
PFRF and $200 per tonne for disposal at landfills as stipulated in the Waste
Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N)).

TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS

5
These key environmental mitigation measures will be implemented by the Architectural Services
Department under a separate PWP Item to be created for construction of police facilities at the KNP site.
6
Public fill reception facilities (PFRF) are specified in Schedule 4 of the Waste Disposal (Charges for
Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N). Disposal of inert construction waste at PFRF
requires a license issued by the Director of Civil Engineering and Development.

4
15. The KNP Works will have no insurmountable traffic impact during the
construction stage. Temporary traffic arrangements (TTAs) will be implemented
to facilitate the construction works. We will establish a Traffic Management
Liaison Group (TMLG) to discuss, scrutinise and review the TTAs proposed by
the contractors with a view to minimising traffic impact arising from the KNP
Works. We will maintain close contact with relevant District Councils, and will
conduct local consultation prior to the implementation of major TTAs under the
KNP Works. In addition, we will set up a telephone hotline to respond to public
enquiries or complaints.

LAND ACQUISITION

16. The KNP Works do not require any resumption of private land, but
involve removal of 4 graves and clearance of government land.

HERITAGE IMPLICATIONS

17. The KNP Works will not affect any heritage sites, i.e. all declared
monuments, proposed monuments, graded historic sites/buildings, sites of
archaeological interest and Government historic sites identified by the Antiquities
and Monuments Office.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

18. We upgraded 7793CL to Category B in September 2015.

19. We engaged consultants to carry out an engineering feasibility study

for the co-location of police facilities at the KNP site at an estimated cost of $16.4
million in MOD prices in December 2014. The cost was charged to the block
allocation Subhead 7100CX “New towns and urban area works, studies and
investigations for items in Category D of the Public Works Programme”. The
relevant engineering feasibility study has been completed.

20. We engaged consultants to carry out detailed design and site

investigation for the KNP Works at an estimated cost of $16.3 million in MOD
prices in January 2017. The cost was charged to the block allocation Subhead
7100CX “New towns and urban area works, studies and investigations for items
in Category D of the Public Works Programme”. The detailed design and site
investigation have been largely completed.

5
21. Of the 6 856 trees within the boundary of the KNP Works, 2 418 trees
will be preserved whereas 4 438 trees will be affected, including 4 435 trees to be
felled and 3 trees to be transplanted within the proposed works site. All the trees
to be removed are not important trees 7. We will incorporate planting proposals
as part of the KNP Works, including about 1 594 trees and 66 370 shrubs 8.

Development Bureau
Civil Engineering and Development Department
January 2019

7
“Important trees” refer to trees in the Register of Old and Valuable Trees, or any other trees that
meet one or more of the following criteria –
(a) trees of 100 years old or above;
(b) trees of cultural, historical or memorable significance, e.g. Fung Shui trees, trees as landmark
of monastery or heritage monument, and trees in memory of an impartment person or event;
(c) trees of precious or rare species;
(d) trees of outstanding form (taking account of the overall tree sizes, shape and any special
features), e.g. trees with curtain like aerial roots, trees growing in unusual habitat; or
(e) trees with a trunk diameter equal to or exceeding 1.0 m (measured at 1.3 m above ground
level), or with a height/canopy spread equal to or exceeding 25m.
8
In the planting proposals, about 6 862 trees and 113 820 shrubs will be carried out by the
Architectural Services Department under a separate PWP Item.

6
 ªþ¥ó4 ªANNEX 1 TO ENCLOSURE 4

¹Ï¨

40
l
76

LEGEND: 60

¬I¤u°

道
LIMIT OF WORKS AREA

沙 嶺
A

80
ÀÀij¬û¥Ë¨jÄ [

PROPOSED POLICE FACILITIES

IN KONG NGA PO SITE
D 路
A
ÀÀij¬û¥Ë¨j NG
R
O

A錦
D
渡

LI O文
PROPOSED KONG NGA PO ROAD SH
A
A R
IMPROVEMENT WORKS À T
O
å M
¤ K
A
ÀÀij¬û¥Ë¨jĵ N
新 屋 嶺 拘 留 中 心

沙 嶺
San U k Ling
A A
PROPOSED INTERNAL ROAD AT M H ol
ding C ent
re

道
POLICE FACILITIES IN KONG NGA PO 缸 瓦 甫 恐 龍 坑
ÀÀij¬û¥Ë¨jÄ
KO N G N G A PO
練靶場
H U N G LU N G H AN G
PROPOSED POLICE FACILITIES
ÀÀij¾ l 72
環 保 署 IN KONG NGA PO SITE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL K
禽 畜 廢 物

D
堆 肥 廠

A
O
R
10¢

O
ÀÀij«d¤g / ÀÀij¦a
T
M
A
K

3 PROPOSED
PROPOSED CUT / FILL SLOPE
N

D
A

UNDERPASS

A
M

O
墳 場

R
沙 嶺 辦 事 處
金 塔 墳 場 沙 嶺 3

O
P
[ Sha Li
ng
2 A

缸
A
STATI
ON ROAD
WU

瓦
5
6 G
LO 4 7 N

甫
k 3

AD
O
:

R
N

4
警 犬 隊 總 部 暨

G
AN
O

H
ù
木 湖 原 水 抽 水 站 20

A
:

警 察 搜 查 隊
M uk W u R aw W at
er

M
K

K
Pum pi ng Stati
on

N
2

LI
p 打 鼓 嶺 村
簡 頭 圍
: 木 湖 Ta Kwu Li
ng Vi
ll
age
Kan Tau W ai

訓 練 學 校 M uk W u 平 原
R | 河
E

邊 界 警 區 總 部 IV