Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

PART I

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

I. Introduction

• Neptali Gonzales, Administrative Law, Chapt. 1

• 15 SCRA 373-376

A. Definition

B. Origin

C. Distinguished from other disciplines

D. Kinds of administrative law

E. Advantages of administrative action over both legislative and judicial action

II. Basic Principles

• Gonzales, Chapt. 3

A. Separation of powers

• U.S. v. Bull, 15 Phil. 7

B. Non-delegation of powers

• Gerochi v. Department of Energy, 527 SCRA 696

C. Tests of validity of delegation of powers

• People v. Vera, 65 Phil. 56

• Araneta v. Dinglasan, G.R. No. L-2044, Aug. 26, 1949

• Rodriguez v. Gella, G.R. No. L-6266, Feb. 12, 2953

• Rubi v. Prov’l Board of Mindoro, G.R. No. L-14078, Mar. 7, 1919

• Municipality of Cardona v. Municipality of Binangonan, G.R. No. L-10202,

Mar. 27, 1917

• Pangasinan Transportation Co. v. Public Service Commission, 70 Phil. 221

• Calalang v. Williams, 70 Phil. 726


• Cervantes v. Auditor General, G.R. No. L04043, May 26, 1952

• Pelaez v. Auditor General, 15 SCRA 569

• Vigan Electric Light Co. v. Public Service Commission, 10 SCRA 46

III. Creation, establishment and abolition of administrative agencies

• Gonzales, Chapt. 2

A. Nature

B. Definition

C. Creation

D. Control over administrative agencies

E. Abolition

• E.O. No. 292, Book III, Chapt. 10, Sec. 31; Book VII, Chapt. 1, Sec. 2(1)

• 1987 Constitution, Art. IX; Art. X, Sec. 11; Art. XI, Secs. 5, 13; Art. XII,

Secs. 9, 15, 20; Art. XIII, Secs. 17, 18; Art. XIV, Sec. 9

• Biraogo vs. Truth Commission, G.R. No. 192935, Dec. 7, 2010

• Lacson-Magallanes, Co., Inc. v. Pano, 21 SCRA 895

IV. Powers and functions of administrative agencies

• Gonzales, Chapt. 4

A. Rule-making

B. Adjudication

C. Incidental

• Sierra Madre Trust vs. Secretary of Agriculture, 121 SCRA 384

• Antipolo Realty Corp. vs. National Housing Authority, 153 SCRA 399

• City of Baguio vs. Nino, 487 SCRA 216

• Department of Agrarian Reform vs. Sutton, 473 SCRA 392

• Cabarrus vs. Bernas, 279 SCRA 388


D. Requirements for enforcement of administrative issuances

• GMA Network, Inc. vs. Movie & Television Review & Classification

Board, 514 SCRA 191

• Tanada vs. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446

• People v. Que Po Lay, 94 Phil. 640

• People v. Maceren, 79 SCRA 450

E. Tests for the validity of administrative powers

V. Administrative adjudication

• Gonzales, Chapt. 5

A. Limitation on the conferment of quasi-judicial power

• Miller vs. Mardo, 2 SCRA 898

• Cabarrus vs. Bernas, 279 SCRA 388

B. Jurisdiction

• Taleon vs. Secretary of Public Works, 20 SCRA 69

• RCPI vs. Board of Communications, 80 SCRA 471

• National Housing Authority vs. Commission on the Settlement of Land

Problems, 505 SCRA 38

C. Rules of procedure

• Espinoza vs. Provincial Adjudicator, 516 SCRA 635

• Perez vs. People, 544 SCRA 532

D. Privilege against self-incrimination

• Chavez vs. Court of Appeals, 24 SCRA 663

• Galman vs. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 294

• Bengzon, Jr. vs. Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, 203 SCRA 767

E. Substantial Evidence Rule


• Ang Tibay vs. Court of Industrial Relations, 69 Phil. 635

• De Jesus vs. Guerrero III, 598 SCRA 341

VI. Administrative enforcement and sanctions

• Gonzales, Chapt. 6

A. Administrative subpoena

• Evangelista vs. Jarencio, 68 SCRA 99

B. Power of contempt

• Masangkay vs. Comelec, 6 SCRA 27

C. Administrative sanctions

D. Summary powers

E. Judicial enforcement

Potrebbero piacerti anche