Department Urban and Regional Planning

Name
Course Final Project
Name
Course Code DK184802
Semester VIII
Credit 6
Coordinator Ketut Dewi Martha Erli H, ST, MT
Lecturer

Course Evaluation
The mechanism and proportion of assessment for the Final Project subject are arranged as follows:
Evaluation I (20%) : Consultation
 Individual activeness
Evaluation II (35%) : Discussion Session
 Individual Presentation
Evaluation III (35%) : Thesis defense
 Individual Presentation
Evaluation IV (10%) : Final Project Report Revision
 Preparation of the final report
 EVALUATION AND FINAL ASSIGNMENT ASSESSMENT PLAN

1. EVALUATION I :
ASSIGNMENT I – CONSULTATION

Course name Final Project

Credit 6 credit
Modul Modul 1 – Modul 11
Modul Learning  Students are able to apply research procedures in cases of regional,
Objective city and coastal planning
 Students are able to carry out the research process correctly according
to scientific principles
 Students are able to synthesize theories, concepts and methods in
research in the case of regional, city and coastal planning
 Students are able to analyze through quantitative and qualitative
techniques
 Students are able to compile prescriptions from the results of
academic studies through the research process
 Students are able to compile scientific articles and publish
 Students are able to work independently in the research process
 Students are able to communicate visually, verbally and verbally the
results of academic studies through the research process
Learning Objective  Students can carry out assistance to monitor the progress of the
research process regularly
 Students can carry out the research process in accordance with a
predetermined timeline

Depth of Consultation C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6

Detail of Consultation Enclosed below regarding description of evaluation and assessment criteria
 EVALUATION I:
Consultation

A. OBJECTIVES

Guidance Evaluation to measure the level of activity of INDIVIDUALS in working on the Final
Project. The objectives of Evaluation I are:
• Students can carry out assistance to monitor the process of further research
• Students can carry out the research process according to the specified time
B. MATERIAL

Material for consultation are:

 Abstract
 Chapter 1
 Chapter 2
 Chapter 3
 Chapter 4
 Chapter 5

C. ASSIGNMENT EXECUTION
• Students are advised to consult / assist the TA supervisor at least 6 times

• The mentoring process can be carried out on a predetermined schedule with the TA
supervisor

• TA students must complete the assistance form as a note when guiding

 D. SCORING CRITERIA

The evaluation weight for Evaluation I is 20%, which consists of:

Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad

No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
1 Abstract Very Actively do Abstract Actively do Abstract Adequately do Abstract Less Actively do Abstract Not Actively do Abstract
consultation consultation consultation consultation consultation consultation
2 Introduction Very Actively do Actively do Introduction Adequately do Introduction Less Actively do Not Actively do
consultation Introduction consultation consultation consultation Introduction consultation Introduction
consultation
3 Literature review Very Actively do Literature Actively do Literature review Adequately do Literature Less Actively do Literature Not Actively do
consultation review consultation consultation review consultation review consultation Literature review
consultation
4 Research method Very Actively do Research Actively do Research Adequately do Research Less Actively do Research Not Actively do Research
consultation method consultation method consultation method consultation method consultation method consultation
5 Result and Very Actively do Result and Actively do Result and Adequately do Result and Less Actively do Result Not Actively do Result
discussion discussion consultation discussion consultation discussion consultation and discussion and discussion
consultation consultation consultation
6 COnslusion and Very Actively do conclusion Actively do conclusion and Adequately do conclusion Less Actively do Not Actively do
recommendation and recommendation recommendation and recommendation conclusion and conclusion and
consultation consultation consultation consultation recommendation recommendation
consultation consultation
Average score
2. EVALUASI II :
TUGAS II –SIDANG PEMBAHASAN
Course name Final Project
Credit 6 module
Modul Modul 1 – Modul 11
Modul Learning  Students are able to apply research procedures in
Objective cases of regional, city and coastal planning
 Students are able to carry out the research process
correctly according to scientific principles
 Students are able to synthesize theories, concepts and
methods in research in the case of regional, city and
coastal planning
 Students are able to analyze through quantitative and
qualitative techniques
 Students are able to compile prescriptions from the
results of academic studies through the research
process
 Students are able to compile scientific articles and
publish
 Students are able to work independently in the
research process
 Students are able to communicate visually, verbally
and verbally the results of academic studies through
the research process
Learning The Discussion Session aims to evaluate the final project draft.
Objective The evaluation is seen from the accuracy of the background of
the problem, the formulation of the problem, the aims and
objectives of the study, the scope of the research, the
literature, the research methods, data and analysis, and the
draft conclusions and recommendations

Depth of C1, C2, C3, C4, C5

Discussion
Session
Detail of Enclosed below regarding description of evaluation and
Discussion assessment criteria
Session
 EVALUATION II:
DISCUSSION SESSION

A. OBJECTIVES

he discussion session aims to evaluate the TA draft. The evaluation is seen from the accuracy of
the background of the problem, the formulation of the problem, the aims and objectives of the
study, the scope of the study, the literature, the research methods, the data and analysis, and
the draft conclusions and recommendations.
B. MATERIAL

Discussion session consist of :

1. Chapter 1 Introduction

2. Chapter 2 Literature Review

3. Chapter 3 Research Methods

4. Chapter 4 Results and Discussion

5. Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations (Draft)

6. References

C. ASSIGNMENT EXECUTION

Discussion session procedure are as follows:

 Final project students and Final project supervisors complete the STA-06 form that
contains the Discussion Session application according to the proposed schedule. Then
the form is submitted to the TU accompanied by a Final project draft of 3 (three) copies.
TA draft is in A5 format and bound by the cover of ITS Final project.
 The administration will inform the Examination Schedule to the Examiners
 The implementation of the Discussion Session was conducted in a closed manner
attended by:
o Student participants
o Final project Advisor
o 2 (two) lecturers / examiners
 All activities of the Discussion Session will be set forth in the Minutes of Discussion
Meeting, which will be published within 1 week after the Discussion Session through the
STA-07 form.
 If a Final project student is declared NOT PASSED at the Discussion Session, then the
student can submit a Re-Discussion / Re-Session Meeting. Repetition of the Discussion
Session is carried out with the following conditions:
 Maximum repeat of the Discussion Session 2 (two) times
 D. Kriteria Penilaian
Bobot penilaian untuk Evaluasi II adalah 35% terdiri dari 6 kriteria penilaian seperti berikut ini:

Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad

No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
1 Introduction  The existence of • The existence of • The existence of • The existence of  The existence of
empirical facts is very empirical facts is empirical facts is quite incomplete empirical empirical facts is
complete in the complete in the complete in the facts in the very incomplete in
background, supported background, supported background, supported background, supported the background,
by the latest data / by up to date data / by up to date data / by up to date data / supported by up to
information and valid information and valid information and valid information and valid date data /
reference sources reference sources reference sources reference sources information and
 Formulation of • Formulation of the • Formulation of • Formulation of valid reference
problems and research problem and research problems and research problems and research sources
questions that are very questions are appropriate questions is quite questions is  Formulation of
appropriate • Formulation of research appropriate inappropriate problems and
 Formulation of the objectives and targets is • Formulation of research • Formulation of research questions
objectives and appropriate objectives and targets is research objectives and is very inappropriate
objectives of the study • Formulation of research quite appropriate targets is not  Formulation of
is very precise scope is appropriate • Formulation of the appropriate research objectives
 The formulation of the scope of the study is • The formulation of and targets is not
research approval quite appropriat the scope of the study appropriate
room is very is not appropriate  Formulation of
appropriate research scope is
not appropriate
2 Literature review  The substance of the  The substance of the • The substance of the • The substance of the • The substance of
literature review with literature review with literature review with the literature review with the literature review
the topic / title of the the TA topic / title TA topic / title is quite the TA topic / title is with the topic / title of
TA is very appropriate accordingly appropriate quite appropriate the TA is
 The substance of the  The substance of the • The substance of the • The substance of the inappropriate
literature review is complete literature literature review is quite literature review is • The substance of
very complete review complete quite complete the literature review is
 The synthesis of  Synthesis of appropriate • The synthesis of • The synthesis of very incomplete
literature is very literature studies literature studies is quite literature studies is • The synthesis of
appropriate  Writing libraries appropriate quite appropriate literature studies is
 Writing literature (citations) is • Literature writing is • Literature writing is very inappropriate
 Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad
No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
(citations) is very appropriate and quite appropriate and quite appropriate and • Writing of literature
appropriate and appropriate appropriate appropriate (citation) is
appropriate  Most libraries / • Library / literature • Library / literature inappropriate and
 Library / literature all literature are up to date partially up to date partially up to date appropriate
up to date (latest) (latest) (latest) (latest) • Library / literature
• The substance of the not up to date (latest
literature review with
the topic / title of the
TA is not appropriate
• The substance of the
literature review is
incomplete
• The synthesis of the
literature review is
inappropriate
• Writing of literature
(citations) is not
appropriate and
appropriate
• Small literature /
literature up to date
(latest)
3 Research  The formulation of the  Formulation of research • The formulation of the • The formulation of • The formulation of
MEthod research approach and approaches and types research approach and the research approach the research approach
the type of research of research are the type of research is and the type of and the type of
are very appropriate appropriate quite appropriate research are not research are very
 Formulation of  The formulation of • Formulation of research appropriate inappropriate
research variables and research variables and variables and operational • Formulation of • Formulation of
operational definitions operational definitions definitions is quite research variables and research variables and
is very appropriate is appropriate appropriate operational definitions operational definitions
 The formulation of  The formulation of data • The formulation of data is less precise is very inappropriate
data collection and collection and analysis collection and analysis • The formulation of • The formulation of
analysis methods is methods is appropriate methods is quite precise data collection and data collection and
very precise  The formulation of the • The formulation of flow analysis methods is analysis methods is
 The formulation of flow chart and the charts and stages of inappropriate very inappropriate
 Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad
No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
flow charts and stages stages of research is research is quite precise • The formulation of • The formulation of
of research is very correct • Research methods with the flow chart and the the flow chart and the
precise  Research methods with research objectives and stages of research is stages of research is
 Research methods research goals and targets are quite less precise very inappropriate
with research goals objectives are appropriate • Research methods • Research methods
and objectives are very appropriate with research with research goals
suitable objectives and targets and objectives are not
are not appropriate appropriate
4 Data and  Data for the analysis  Data for a complete  Data for the analysis  Data for the analysis • Data for the analysis
Analysis process is very analysis process process is quite process is incomplete process is very
complete  The analysis process complete  The analysis process incomplete
 The analysis process with the analytical  The process of analysis with analytical • The analysis process
with analytical method is appropriate with analytical methods methods is not with analytical
methods is very  The results of the is quite appropriate appropriate methods is not
suitable analysis for research  The results of analysis  The results of the appropriate
 The results of analysis purposes have for research purposes analysis for research • The results of the
for research purposes considerable benefits have moderate benefits purposes have low analysis for research
have very high benefits purposes have very
benefits low benefits
5 Conclusion  Conclusion formulation  Conclusion formulation  Conclusion formulation  Conclusion formulas  Conclusion
has very high quality • has quite high quality is of moderate quality are of low quality • formulation has very
The conclusions  Formulation of  The conclusions The conclusions low quality
formulated with the conclusions with the formulated with the formulated with the Formulation of
results of the analysis results of the analysis is results of the analysis results of the analysis conclusions with the
are very suitable appropriate are quite appropriate are not appropriate • results of the
 Formulation of  Formulation of  Formulation of Formulation of analysis is not
conclusions with the conclusions with the conclusions with the conclusions with the appropriate •
aim of research is very aim of research is aim of research is quite aim of research is not Formulation of
suitable appropriate appropriate appropriate conclusions with the
aim of research is
not appropriate
6 Ability to present  Fluency and selection  Fluency and selection • Fluency and selection of • Fluency and choice of  Fluency and choice
and answer of words at of words during the words at presentation is words at presentation is of words during
presentation is very presentation is good quite good not good presentations is
good  Clear and coherent • Presentation material • Presentation material very poor
 Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad
No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
 Presentation material presentation material that is quite clear and that is unclear and  Presentation
that is very clear and  Good presentation coherent coherent material that is
coherent material using • Good presentation • Poor presentation unclear and
 Excellent presentation explanations such as material using material without using coherent
materials using graphics, diagrams, explanations such as explanations such as  Presentation
explanations such as images, and so on graphics, diagrams, graphics, diagrams, material that does
graphics, diagrams,  Good appearance seen pictures, and so on images, etc. not use
images, and so on from gesture and eye • Appearance that is quite • Poor appearance seen explanations such
 Very good appearance contact, and high self- good seen from gesture from gesture and eye as graphics,
seen from gesture and confidence and eye contact, and self- contact, and lack of diagrams, images,
eye contact, as well as  Able to explain and confidence is quite good confidence and so on
high confidence respond to questions • Enough to be able to • Less able to explain  Appearances that
 Very able to explain  Have high openness in explain and respond to and respond to are very less seen
and respond to receiving input questions questions from gesture and
questions • Have sufficient • Having a lack of eye contact, and
 Have very high openness in receiving openness in receiving are not confident
openness in receiving input input  Not able to explain
input and respond to
questions
 Does not have
openness in
receiving input
Average score
Setiap kriteria penilaian memiliki persentase yang berbeda-beda seperti pada tabel di bawah
ini:

Persentase Penilaian Setiap Kriteria pada Sidang Pembahasan

SCORE (0-100)
NO CRITERIA
Mentor Examiner1 Examiner 2
1. Foreword/Preface/Exordium
(10%)
2. Literature Review (10%)
3. Research Methodology
(15%)
4. Analysis and Data (50%)
5. Research Conclusion (5%)
6. Presenting ability and
answering question (10%)
TOTAL (filled by final project
operator)
AVERAGE (filled by final project
operator)

NILAI (0-
NO CRITERIA / BOBOT 100)
Mentor
1 FOREWORD/PREFACE/EXORDIUM (10%)
 Empirical fact existance in background, supported with up to date data/information and
valid reference source
 Problem formulation and research question validity
 Purpose dan research target formulation validity
 Research scope formulation validity
2 LITERATURE REVIEW (10%)
 Sutability between literature review substance with topic/ final project title
 Literature review substance comprehensiveness
 Literature review syinthesis accuracy
 Literature writing validity (citation)
 Literature novelty
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (15%)
 Research approaches and research type formulation validity
 Research variable and operational definition formulation validity
 Collecting method and data analysis formulation validity
 Flow chart dan research phase formulation validity
 Suitability between research methodology with research target and purpose
4 ANALYSIS AND DATA (50%)
 Data comprehensiveness for analysis process
 Analysis process suitability with analysis method
 Research output expediency for research purpose
 NILAI (0-
NO CRITERIA / BOBOT 100)
Mentor
5 RESEARCH CONCLUSION (5%)
 Conclusion formulation quality
 Conclusion formulation suitability with analysis output
 Conclusion formulation suitability with researh purpose
6 PRESENTING ABILITY AND ANSWERING QUESTION (10%)
 Fluency and choosing words
 Explication and presentation material sequence
 Using explanatory (graphic, diagram, pictures, and others)
 Appearance, Gesture, Eye contact, Confidence
 Ability to explain and respond question
 Openness to accept recommendation
3. EVALUASI III :
TUGAS III –SIDANG UJIAN
Course name Final Project
Credit 6 credits
Modul Modul 1 – Modul 11
Modul Learning  Students are able to apply research procedures in cases of regional,
Objective city and coastal planning
 Students are able to carry out the research process correctly according
to scientific principles
 Students are able to synthesize theories, concepts and methods in
research in the case of regional, city and coastal planning
 Students are able to analyze through quantitative and qualitative
techniques
 Students are able to compile prescriptions from the results of
academic studies through the research process
 Students are able to compile scientific articles and publish
 Students are able to work independently in the research process
 Students are able to communicate visually, verbally and verbally the
results of academic studies through the research process
Learning Objective  The thesis defense aims to evaluate the entire research process that
has been carried out based on the completeness and accuracy of the
substance of the Final Projectreport. The evaluation is seen from the
accuracy of the background of the problem, the formulation of the
problem, the goals and objectives of the study, the scope of the study,
the literature, the research methods, the data and analysis, and
conclusions and recommendations.
Depth ofThesis C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6
Defense
Detail of thesis Enclosed below regarding description of evaluation and assessment
defense criteria
 EVALUATION III:
Thesis defense
A. OBJECTIVE

The THESIS DEFENSE aims to evaluate the entire research process that has been carried out
based on the completeness and accuracy of the substance of the TA report. The evaluation is
seen from the accuracy of the background of the problem, the formulation of the problem, the
goals and objectives of the study, the scope of the study, the literature, the research methods,
the data and analysis, and conclusions and recommendations.

B. MATERIAL

Discussion session consist of :

1. Chapter 1 Introduction

2. Chapter 2 Literature Review

3. Chapter 3 Research Methods

4. Chapter 4 Results and Discussion

5. Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations (Draft)

6. References

C. PELAKSANAAN TUGAS

The Thesis Defense is carried out with the following procedure:

• Final Project students and Final Project supervisors complete the STA-08 form that contains
the Exam Session application according to the proposed schedule. Then the form is submitted
to the TU accompanied by a TA draft of 3 (three) copies. TA draft is in A5 format and bound by
the cover of ITS Final Project.
• Administration will inform the Trial Session schedule to the examiners
• Implementation of the Trial Session is openly attended by:
o Student participants
o Final Project Advisor
o 2 (two) lecturers / examiners. One of the testers is an external examiner from outside the
Regional and City Planning Department, ITS. This external examiner is determined based on
consideration of the suitability of the competency / scientific field, at least having a Masters / S2
education and having affiliation with certain agencies / institutions
• All the Trial Session activities will be set forth in the Minutes of the Discussion Meeting, which
will be published within 1 week after the Discussion Session through the STA-09 form.
• If a Final Project student is declared NOT PASSED at the Discussion Session, then the student
can submit a Re-Discussion / Re-Session Meeting. Repetition of the Discussion Session is carried
out with the following conditions:
o Maximum repeat of the Discussion Session 2 (two) times
o The maximum time limit between the previous session is 10 (ten) weeks
 D. SCORING CRITERIA
the evaluation weight for Evaluation III is 35% consisting of 7 assessment criteria such as the following:

Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad

No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
1 Introduction  The existence of • The existence of • The existence of • The existence of  The existence of
empirical facts is very empirical facts is empirical facts is quite incomplete empirical empirical facts is
complete in the complete in the complete in the facts in the very incomplete in
background, supported background, supported background, supported background, supported the background,
by the latest data / by up to date data / by up to date data / by up to date data / supported by up to
information and valid information and valid information and valid information and valid date data /
reference sources reference sources reference sources reference sources information and
 Formulation of • Formulation of the • Formulation of • Formulation of valid reference
problems and research problem and research problems and research problems and research sources
questions that are very questions are appropriate questions is quite questions is  Formulation of
appropriate • Formulation of research appropriate inappropriate problems and
 Formulation of the objectives and targets is • Formulation of research • Formulation of research questions
objectives and appropriate objectives and targets is research objectives and is very inappropriate
objectives of the study • Formulation of research quite appropriate targets is not  Formulation of
is very precise scope is appropriate • Formulation of the appropriate research objectives
 The formulation of the scope of the study is • The formulation of and targets is not
research approval quite appropriat the scope of the study appropriate
room is very is not appropriate  Formulation of
appropriate research scope is
not appropriate
2 Literature review  The substance of the  The substance of the • The substance of the • The substance of the • The substance of
literature review with literature review with literature review with the literature review with the literature review
the topic / title of the the TA topic / title TA topic / title is quite the TA topic / title is with the topic / title of
TA is very appropriate accordingly appropriate quite appropriate the TA is
 The substance of the  The substance of the • The substance of the • The substance of the inappropriate
literature review is complete literature literature review is quite literature review is • The substance of
very complete review complete quite complete the literature review is
 The synthesis of  Synthesis of appropriate • The synthesis of • The synthesis of very incomplete
literature is very literature studies literature studies is quite literature studies is • The synthesis of
appropriate  Writing libraries appropriate quite appropriate literature studies is
 Writing literature (citations) is • Literature writing is • Literature writing is very inappropriate
 Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad
No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
(citations) is very appropriate and quite appropriate and quite appropriate and • Writing of literature
appropriate and appropriate appropriate appropriate (citation) is
appropriate  Most libraries / • Library / literature • Library / literature inappropriate and
 Library / literature all literature are up to date partially up to date partially up to date appropriate
up to date (latest) (latest) (latest) (latest) • Library / literature
• The substance of the not up to date (latest
literature review with
the topic / title of the
TA is not appropriate
• The substance of the
literature review is
incomplete
• The synthesis of the
literature review is
inappropriate
• Writing of literature
(citations) is not
appropriate and
appropriate
• Small literature /
literature up to date
(latest)
3 Research  The formulation of the  Formulation of research • The formulation of the • The formulation of • The formulation of
MEthod research approach and approaches and types research approach and the research approach the research approach
the type of research of research are the type of research is and the type of and the type of
are very appropriate appropriate quite appropriate research are not research are very
 Formulation of  The formulation of • Formulation of research appropriate inappropriate
research variables and research variables and variables and operational • Formulation of • Formulation of
operational definitions operational definitions definitions is quite research variables and research variables and
is very appropriate is appropriate appropriate operational definitions operational definitions
 The formulation of  The formulation of data • The formulation of data is less precise is very inappropriate
data collection and collection and analysis collection and analysis • The formulation of • The formulation of
analysis methods is methods is appropriate methods is quite precise data collection and data collection and
very precise  The formulation of the • The formulation of flow analysis methods is analysis methods is
 The formulation of flow chart and the charts and stages of inappropriate very inappropriate
 Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad
No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
flow charts and stages stages of research is research is quite precise • The formulation of • The formulation of
of research is very correct • Research methods with the flow chart and the the flow chart and the
precise  Research methods with research objectives and stages of research is stages of research is
 Research methods research goals and targets are quite less precise very inappropriate
with research goals objectives are appropriate • Research methods • Research methods
and objectives are very appropriate with research with research goals
suitable objectives and targets and objectives are not
are not appropriate appropriate
4 Data and  Data for the analysis  Data for a complete  Data for the analysis  Data for the analysis • Data for the analysis
Analysis process is very analysis process process is quite process is incomplete process is very
complete  The analysis process complete  The analysis process incomplete
 The analysis process with the analytical  The process of analysis with analytical • The analysis process
with analytical method is appropriate with analytical methods methods is not with analytical
methods is very  The results of the is quite appropriate appropriate methods is not
suitable analysis for research  The results of analysis  The results of the appropriate
 The results of analysis purposes have for research purposes analysis for research • The results of the
for research purposes considerable benefits have moderate benefits purposes have low analysis for research
have very high benefits purposes have very
benefits low benefits
5 Conclusion  Conclusion formulation  Conclusion formulation  Conclusion formulation  Conclusion formulas  Conclusion
has very high quality • has quite high quality is of moderate quality are of low quality • formulation has very
The conclusions  Formulation of  The conclusions The conclusions low quality
formulated with the conclusions with the formulated with the formulated with the Formulation of
results of the analysis results of the analysis is results of the analysis results of the analysis conclusions with the
are very suitable appropriate are quite appropriate are not appropriate • results of the
 Formulation of  Formulation of  Formulation of Formulation of analysis is not
conclusions with the conclusions with the conclusions with the conclusions with the appropriate •
aim of research is very aim of research is aim of research is quite aim of research is not Formulation of
suitable appropriate appropriate appropriate conclusions with the
aim of research is
not appropriate
6 Ability to present  Fluency and selection  Fluency and selection • Fluency and selection of • Fluency and choice of  Fluency and choice
and answer of words at of words during the words at presentation is words at presentation is of words during
presentation is very presentation is good quite good not good presentations is
good  Clear and coherent • Presentation material • Presentation material very poor
 Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad
No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
 Presentation material presentation material that is quite clear and that is unclear and  Presentation
that is very clear and  Good presentation coherent coherent material that is
coherent material using • Good presentation • Poor presentation unclear and
 Excellent presentation explanations such as material using material without using coherent
materials using graphics, diagrams, explanations such as explanations such as  Presentation
explanations such as images, and so on graphics, diagrams, graphics, diagrams, material that does
graphics, diagrams,  Good appearance seen pictures, and so on images, etc. not use
images, and so on from gesture and eye • Appearance that is quite • Poor appearance seen explanations such
 Very good appearance contact, and high self- good seen from gesture from gesture and eye as graphics,
seen from gesture and confidence and eye contact, and self- contact, and lack of diagrams, images,
eye contact, as well as  Able to explain and confidence is quite good confidence and so on
high confidence respond to questions • Enough to be able to • Less able to explain  Appearances that
 Very able to explain  Have high openness in explain and respond to and respond to are very less seen
and respond to receiving input questions questions from gesture and
questions • Have sufficient • Having a lack of eye contact, and
 Have very high openness in receiving openness in receiving are not confident
openness in receiving input input  Not able to explain
input and respond to
questions
 Does not have
openness in
receiving input
Average score
Each criterion has a different percentage of evaluation as in the table below:

NO CRITERIA NILAI (0-100)

Pembimbing Examiner Examiner
1 2
1. Abstract (5%)
2. Foreword/Preface/Exordium
(10%)
3. Literature Review (15%)
4. Research Methodology (20%)
5. Analysis and data (30%)
6. Research conclusion (5%)
7. Presenting ability and answering
question (1 5%)
TOTAL (filled by final project operator)
AVERAGE (filled by final project
operator)

NILAI (0-
NO KRITERIA / BOBOT 100)
Mentor
1 ABSTRACT (5%)
 Abstract content comprehensiveness (problem and purpose, research methodology,
output and conclusion, and keyword)
 Complete, full of meaning/short, clear, and formed well
2 FOREWORD/PREFACE/EXORDIUM (10%)
Empirical fact existance in background, supported with up to date data/information and
valid reference source
Problem formulation and research question validity
Purpose dan research target formulation validity
Research scope formulation validity
3 LITERATURE REVIEW(15%)
Sutability between literature review substance with topic/ final project title
Literature review substance comprehensiveness
Literature review syinthesis accuracy
Literature writing validity (citation)
Literature novelty
4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (20%)
Research approaches and research type formulation validity
Research variable and operational definition formulation validity
Collecting method and data analysis formulation validity
Flow chart dan research phase formulation validity
Suitability between research methodology with research target and purpose
5 ANALYSIS AND DATA (30%)
Data comprehensiveness for analysis process
Analysis process suitability with analysis method
Research output expediency for research purpose
 NILAI (0-
NO KRITERIA / BOBOT 100)
Mentor
6 RESEARCH CONCLUSION (5%)
Conclusion formulation quality
Conclusion formulation suitability with analysis output
Conclusion formulation suitability with researh purpose
7 PRESENTING ABILITY AND ANSWERING QUESTION (15%)
Fluency and choosing words
Explication and presentation material sequence
Using explanatory (graphic, diagram, pictures, and others)
Appearance, Gesture, Eye contact, Confidence
Ability to explain and respond question
Openness to accept recommendation
4. EVALUASI IV :
TUGAS IV –REVISI BUKU TA
Course name Final Project
Credit 6 credits
Modul Modul 1 – Modul 11
Modul Learning  Students are able to apply research procedures in cases of regional,
Objective city and coastal planning
 Students are able to carry out the research process correctly according
to scientific principles
 Students are able to synthesize theories, concepts and methods in
research in the case of regional, city and coastal planning
 Students are able to analyze through quantitative and qualitative
techniques
 Students are able to compile prescriptions from the results of
academic studies through the research process
 Students are able to compile scientific articles and publish
 Students are able to work independently in the research process
 Students are able to communicate visually, verbally and verbally the
results of academic studies through the research process
Learning Objective The revision of the TA book aims to evaluate the completion of the final TA book
report that has been prepared in accordance with various inputs during the Trial
Session. The evaluation is seen from the improvement of the background of the
problem, the formulation of the problem, the goals and objectives of the study,
the scope of the research, the literature, the research methods, data and
analysis, and conclusions and recommendations.

Depth of Revision C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6

Detail of Revision Enclosed below regarding description of evaluation and assessment

criteria
 EVALUATION IV:
FINAL PROJECT REPORT REVISION

A. OBJECTIVES

The revision of the TA book aims to evaluate the completion of the final report on the TA book
that has been prepared in accordance with various inputs during the Trial Session. The
evaluation is seen from the improvement of the background of the problem, the formulation of
the problem, the goals and objectives of the study, the scope of the study, the literature, the
research methods, the data and analysis, and conclusions and recommendations.

B. MATERIAL

Discussion session consist of :

1. Chapter 1 Introduction

2. Chapter 2 Literature Review

3. Chapter 3 Research Methods

4. Chapter 4 Results and Discussion

5. Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations (Draft)

6. References

C. PELAKSANAAN TUGAS

The revised FINAL PROJECT book is implemented with the following instructions:
• FINAL PROJECT students must make improvements to the FINAL PROJECT book in
accordance with the Official Report of the Examination that has been published. The results of
the refinement of the TA book were then certified with the FINAL PROJECT Supervisor.
• FINAL PROJECT students are required to complete a form that shows the TA supervisor's
approval of the FINAL PROJECT book that has been refined, as well as the approval of abstract
and abstract translation substances that have fulfilled the rules of English.
 D. SCORING CRITERIA
The evaluation weight for IV Evaluation is 20%, which consists of:

Very good Good Average Bad Very Bad

No Criteria Score
86-100 76-85 66-75 56-65 0-55
1 Abstract Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
improvement the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
2 Introduction Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
improvement the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
3 Literature review Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
improvement the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
4 Research Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
method the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
improvement Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
5 Result and Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
discussion the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
improvement Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
6 COnslusion and Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
recommendation the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
improvement Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
7 Bibliography Very in accordance with In accordance with the Enough in accordance Less in accordance with Not in accordance
improvement the Official Report of the minutes of the Thesis with the minute of the the Minutes of the with the Minutes of
Thesis defense defense thesis defense Thesis defense the thesis defense
Average score