CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALING ENVIRONMENT

AS DESCRIBED BY EXPERT NURSES WHO PRACTICE

WITHIN THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
OF ROGERS’ SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS: A
QUALITATIVE STUDY

by

Phyllis J. Waters

Dissertation
Presented to the Faculty of The University of Texas Graduate School of
Biomedical Sciences at Galveston
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing

Approved by the Supervisory Committee

Phyllis B. Kritek, RN, PhD, FAAN

Richard Cowling III, RN, PhD
Suzanne M. Peloquin, PhD, OTR, FAOTA
Mary Fenton, RN, DrPH, FAAN
Alice Hill, RN, PhD, FAAN

August 2008
Galveston, Texas

Key Words: Healing Environment, Healing Relationships

© 2008, Phyllis J. Waters

 UMI Number: 3360571

Copyright 2009 by
Waters, Phyllis J.

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO USERS

The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy
submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and
photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper
alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.

______________________________________________________________

UMI Microform 3360571

Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
_______________________________________________________________

ProQuest LLC
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
This work is dedicated to the memory of Cale Moore, my soul mate, and my parents –
Eunice and Edward Waters. The pandimensional presence of these beautiful and
powerful beings is a continuing source of comfort, strength, and inspiration to me.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Studying nursing’s role in creating healing environments has been a

professionally and personally transforming experience. Interviews and dialogue with the
extraordinary nurses who participated in this study have increased my passion for and
commitment to my profession. My immersion in the data about the processes of healing
has prompted an examination of my own life patterns and stimulated changes. What is
clear is that these healing transitions occurred because a group of knowledgeable and
caring nurses became a major influence in my environment and healing occurred. Though
prohibited from identifying my subjects by name, I want to acknowledge them as a group
of nurses who gave me a tremendous professional gift: meaningful messages from their
collective wisdom.
Dr. Phyllis B Kritek chaired my dissertation committee. I have never seen a role
description, but I am confident that Dr. Kritek’s professional guidance and personal
support provided while coaching me through this process far exceeded any academic
expectations of a dissertation chairperson. Simply said, this dissertation would not have
been completed without her. The remaining members of my committee gave me the
benefit of their wisdom, never gave up hope, and never let me give up hope: Dr. Mary
Fenton, Dr. Alice Hill, Dr. Richard Cowling, and Dr. Suzanne Peloquin, Dr. Elizabeth T.
Anderson (emeritus) and Dr. Carolyn Kinney (emeritus). In addition to my committee, I
worked closely with Dr. Poldi Tschirch, my qualitative methodology auditor. As the
auditor, Dr. Tschirch read my dissertation nigh onto a dozen times to fulfill her various
responsibilities. The quality of the product and the status of my sanity would not be the
same without her. Linda Franks transcribed all the subject interviews and Barbara
Townsend processed data management and final formatting. These services were
provided during their off duty time with a level of care and commitment way beyond the
compensation they earned for their efforts. With no claim to objectivity, I believe this
was the best dissertation committee and staff support ever.

iv
 Mary Donna Piazza painted a picture of me and the friends and colleagues who
supported me through this lengthy process; underneath the picture it reads: It Takes a
Village to Finish a Dissertation. Absolutely true. My village of supporters is very dear.
Patricia Romick is the mayor of my village. She has been a major support from the time I
decided to pursue a doctorate, through a serious personal illness of my own and through
Cale’s terminal illness. She’s been a counselor, nurse, cook, and most of all friend. By the
way, Patricia knows quite a bit about creating a healing environment. Dr Belinda Gore
and Dr. Connie Silva both provided healing interventions when I was in great need. Mary
Donna and Eddie Hunter stepped in and rescued me from a housing catastrophe during
the time I was completing my dissertation; I am pretty sure my house would have been
condemned if they hadn’t. My colleagues at work were wonderful. David Marshall, my
Chief Nurse, supported my completion in a myriad of ways. Cheryl Day, Ruby Jensen,
and Poldi Tschirch, fellow DONs, covered specific aspects of my role responsibilities so
that I could take time off and concentrate on my dissertation. In addition, Cheryl cheered
for me, Ruby pushed me when I needed it, and Poldi commiserated with me—the three
stooges approach (think about it). The rest of my peers (Jennifer, Bud, and Susan)
tolerated the problems that came from my absence and cheered me on. The Nursing
Practice and Professional Advancement Team and the Educational Resource Team were
fantastic. As their Director, I counted on them to deliver our services; they never let me
down. As my friends and colleagues, I counted on their support; they never let me down.
Linda Bartlett expanded her operations scope and kept us all on track. In the background,
I felt the constant support of my YaYa sisters (Cheryl Day, Corrine Oppermann, Katie
Winslade, Terry Dick, Andrea Conti, Anthe Caruso, Mary Fenton, and Poldi Tschirch)
and my extended family (everyone named Waters or related to someone named Waters in
Savannah, GA and surrounding counties).
I am sure I still have a lot of other people to thank, but I will close with a final
thought: if you care enough about me to read this dissertation or you care enough about
creating a healing environment to read this dissertation, I want to acknowledge you.

v
 CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALING ENVIRONMENT
AS DESCRIBED BY EXPERT NURSES WHO PRACTICE
WITHIN THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
OF ROGERS’ SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS: A
QUALITATIVE STUDY

Phyllis J. Waters
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, August 2008

Supervisor: Phyllis B. Kritek, RN, PhD, FAAN

The purpose of this study was to identify and describe characteristics of a healing
environment from a nursing perspective. This qualitative study was conducted using an
interpretive descriptive method consistent with a naturalistic inquiry model. A purposeful
sample of 9 expert nurses who practice within the conceptual framework of Rogers’
Science of Unitary Human Beings was selected. Data were collected in phone interviews.
Fourteen themes were inferred from the subject interviews, and were organized into three
categories correspondent to three of the research questions; manifestations of healing,
relationships and conditions characteristic of a healing environment, and nursing
practices and processes identified as facilitative of healing. The investigator integrated
the thematic findings from subject responses with conceptions inferred from the
interviews as a whole to formulate an interpretive narrative description of seven
characteristics of a healing environment: 1) the client defines focus and nature of his/her
healing experience; 2) relational experiences are recognized and treated as central
energetic influence in creating a healing environment; 3) nurses and nursing’s unique
professional role are understood, valued, and supported as a dimension of the health care
organization’s culture; 4) the nurse is recognized within the health care setting as the
professional with the potential for the greatest impact in creating a healing environment;
5) nursing practice is theory based with a professional focus on designing client centered
care that facilitates healing; 6) the organizational culture supports balancing
individualization of healing experiences with standardization of best curative practices; 7)
a healing philosophy is embedded in the professional culture and organizational core
values. Conclusions were: a) confirmed congruence between themes and SUHB core
concepts; b) relationship is the most powerful influence on healing process; c) nursing’s
role is central to creating a healing environment; d) theory based practice is essential to
professional level care; and e) individualizing and partnering are as critical to healing as
best practices and clinical standardization are to curing. The investigator recommended
specific questions to research, education and practice leaders to address nursing’s
capacity to create healing environment and existing deterrents to reaching this potential.

vi
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………. iv
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………..…… vi
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………….. x
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION…………………………………...................................... 1
Background and Significance………………………………………………... 1
Purpose………………………………………………………………………… 3
Theoretical Framework………………………………………………………. 4
Following Chapters…………………………………………………………… 8
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………….. 9
Healing Environment…………………………………………………………. 9
Optimal Healing Environment………………………………………………… 10
Healing Space...................................................................................................... 11
Complementary Healing Modalities…………………………………………… 15
Spirituality as Environmental Influence……………………………………….. 18
Organizational Influences on Environment…………………………………… 20
Summary……………………………………………………………………..… 25
Healing Environment in the SUHB Literature……………………………... 26
Theories Derived from the Science of Unitary Human Beings Framework…… 26
Research Relevant to Principles of Homeodynamics………………………….. 29
Mutual Process………………………………………………………………… 34
Art of Nursing Theory………………………………………………………... 34
Empathy……………………………………………………………………….. 35
Presence……………………………………………………………………….. 36
Caring………………………………………………………………………….. 37
Intentionality………………………………………………………………….. 38
Nurse-Client Healing Relationship…………………………………………... 39
Spirituality and Healing……………………………………………………… 40
Patterns and Patterning……………………………………………………….. 41
Summary……………………………………………………………………….. 45

vii
Literature Review: Relevance to the Study……………………….......... 46
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY…………………………………….. 47
Research Design.……………………………………………………………… 47
Human Subject Protection…………………………………………………… 47
Methodology…………………………………………………………………... 48
Sample………………………………………………………………………….. 48
Data Collection Procedure…………………………………………………….. 50
Data 51
Analysis…………………………………………………………………………
Limitations of Study………………………………………………………….. 54
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS……………………………….……………… 56
Answers to Related Research Questions…………………………………….. 58
What Changes in Clients did the Subjects Describe as Manifestations of 58
Healing?...............................................................................................................
Recognizes the Need for Change and Demonstrates Intent to Change……. 58
Engages Knowingly in Reorienting and Mutually Patterning the Energy 59
Field…………………………………………………………………………….
Expresses Sense of Expanded Awareness and Sense of Connectedness 61
with Self, Others, and a Greater Whole……………………………………..
Exhibits Observable and Intuitively Understood Human Field Pattern 62
Changes………………………………………………………………………..
What Conditions and Relationships did subjects Report as Characteristic of 64
Healing environments?........................................................................................
Right Relationship with Self and Meaningful Others………………………. 64
Intentional Mutual Process…………………………………………………... 66
Energetic Influences from Collective Relational Experiences…………….. 68
Client-Centered Design………………………………………………………. 70
Healthy Nursing Culture Facilitates a Healing Environment…….……….. 71
Philosophically Grounded, Open, and in Search of Meaning……………… 73
What Nursing Practices and Processes did Subjects Report as Facilitative of 74
Client Healing?....................................................................................................
Theory-Based Practice……………………………………………………….. 75
Nurse as Environment………………………………………………………... 76
Appraisal and Mutual Patterning…………………………………………… 78
Nursing Art of Designing Care………………………………………………. 82
Summary……………..………………………………………………………… 84

viii
Main Research Question of the Study:
What are the Characteristics of a Healing Environment as Described by
Expert Nurses Who Practice within the Conceptual Framework of Rogers
Science of Unitary Human Beings……………………...……………………… 84
Characteristic 1: In a healing environment, the client defines the focus
and the nature of his/her healing experience……………………………….. 85
Characteristic 2: In a healing environment, relational experiences are
recognized and treated as the central energetic influence in creating such
an environment………………………………………………………………... 86
Characteristic 3: In a healing environment, nurses and their unique
professional role are understood, valued, and supported as a dimension of
the health care organization’s culture………………………………………. 87
Characteristic 4: In a healing environment, the nurse is recognized within
the health care setting as the professional with the potential for the
greatest impact in creating this environment……………………………….. 87
Characteristic 5: In a healing environment, nursing practice is theory-
based with a professional focus on designing client-centered care that
facilitates healing……………………………………………………………… 88
Characteristic 6: In a healing environment, the organizational culture
supports balancing individualization of healing experiences with
standardization of best curative practices………………………………….. 88
Characteristic 7: In a healing environment a healing philosophy is
embedded in the professional culture and organizational core values……. 89
Summary……………………………………………………………………..… 89
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 91
Conclusions……………………………………………………………………. 91
Recommendations…………………………………………………………….. 100
Summary……………………………………………………………………….. 102
APPENDIX A: SAMPLE COMMUNICTION AND DATA
COLLECTION TOOLS………………………………………………… 104
Confirmation of Subjects Participation in Study…………………………… 105
Demographic Profile Form…………………………………………………... 106
Interview Guide………………………………………………………………. 107
Request for Interview Verification…………………………………………... 108
APPENDIX B: COMBINED THEMES DOCUMENTATION 109
Healing Manifestations Themes…………………………………………….... 109
Relationship Themes………………………………………………………….. 121
Condition Themes…………………………………………………………….. 129
Practice Themes………………………………………………………………. 136

ix
REFERENCES…………………………………………………… 150
VITA………………………………………………………………. 166

x
 LIST OF TABLES

Page
Table 1 Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings(SUHB):
Annotated Conceptual Definitions 7

Table 2 Themes responsive to related research questions 57

Table 3 Characteristics of a Healing Environment 85

Table 4 Themes: Links to SUHB Concepts 93

xi
 Chapter 1:

INTRODUCTION

Background and Significance

Though creating a healing environment is an oft quoted goal of nursing, there is

no formal professional consensus on what constitutes a healing environment. In general,
the professional literature on the subject is ambiguous and provides little direction for
practice. This study is designed to determine the characteristics of a healing environment
as described by expert nurses who practice within the nursing conceptual framework of
Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB). The purpose is to discover the
elements required to create a healing environment from a nursing practice perspective.
The essential nature of environment to the healing process is firmly rooted in
nursing’s history, reflected in contemporary theories, and projected as a priority for future
scholarship. Florence Nightingale’s writings are replete with references to the importance
of environment to healing. She differentiated the role of medicine and nursing on this
basis, describing the physician’s role as diagnosis and treatment of disease and the
nurse’s role as providing the external environment and fostering the internal environment
necessary for healing (Nightingale [1860] 1969; Tschirch 1997). The industrialization of
health care over the last 35 years has and continues to present challenges to nurses who
seek to maintain their traditional professional role of creating environments that foster
healing (Cowling and Taliaferro 2004; Gunther and Alligood 2002).
The importance of environment to the profession is reflected by its recognition as
a defining concept in Nursing’s metaparadigm, which is the underpinning of
contemporary nursing theories. The four metaparadigm concepts (person, health,
environment, and nursing) and the propositions that describe the relationships among
these concepts define the domain of nursing and distinguish it from other disciplines.
Nursing’s metaparadigm is recognized as a key framework that “…represents a unique

1
perspective for inquiry and practice” (Fawcett 2000, p. 4). The relationship between
patients/clients and their environments are recognized as a focus for inquiry. In reflecting
on the future of nursing scholarship, Meleis (1997) states that knowledge development
will be driven by clinical practice using methodologies “to reflect the holistic nature of
patients’ responses and their embeddedness in their environments” (p. 225). Despite these
indicators that nursing considers environment central to healing, the literature reflects a
diverse and ambiguous interpretation of these concepts. In addition, there is a dearth of
research on the subject.
Kritek (1997) points out that healing is a term that evokes a sense of familiarity
even though the range of meanings for the term is highly diverse. From a review of the
literature, this investigator confirmed Kritek’s observation. The terms healing and healing
environment were rarely defined; however, the terms were commonly used as though
their meanings were well understood. Of the 825 references identified in general nursing
and health care literature as addressing “healing”, 690 used the term in various ways to
describe interventions for a particular problem (e.g. wound healing, infection
management). The remaining 135 references used the term healing to describe broader
applications or experiences but there was little trending information of use.
The literature specifically referencing the concept of healing environment was
even more limited, providing less than two dozen research publications on the subject.
One useful trend was identified in the literature: the Samueli Institute’s commitment to
developing protocols and conducting research into the integrative medicine concept of
creating Optimal Healing Environments. A review of publications on this initiative,
beginning in 2002, is included in the review of the literature. Though this Optimal
Healing Environment trend shows promise for addressing a neglected area of research,
the publications to date reflect a medical model orientation to the subject. The medical
model approaches, which focus on diagnosis and treatment, used in structuring Optimal
Healing Environment protocols have been of limited use in achieving the aims of this
nursing study.

2
 Literature reporting nursing applications of Rogers’ SUHB provided information
relevant to the focus of this study. Like Nightingale, Rogers envisioned the human-
environment dynamic as central to nursing practice. According to Rogers (1994), “…The
uniqueness of nursing lies in its focus on unitary, irreducible human beings and their
environments” (p. 3). Rogers’ model is grounded in the concept that human energy fields
are irreducible wholes that are integral with their environmental energy fields, which also
are irreducible wholes. Human-environment energy fields are in mutual process.
Research based on Rogers’ SUHB has been conducted on various aspects of the mutual
process of the human-environmental field, nursing modalities to facilitate changes in
human-environmental fields, and pattern manifestations indicative of healing. SUHB
research was found to be both useful and germane in achieving the aims of this study and
was used in designing study questions, interview tools, and interpreting results.
This study is expected to contribute to nursing’s body of knowledge through a
disciplined analysis of descriptions of how a healing environment is created provided by
a specific sample of expert nurses who practice within the context of a common nursing
model, Rogers’ SUHB. Though there are numerous publications referencing varied
aspects of healing and healing environments, this investigator could find no studies that
provide nursing practice-based research on the characteristics of a healing environment.
This study can thus provide insight into and an initial perspective on the meaning and
characteristics of a healing environment from a practice point of view.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify and describe characteristics of a healing

environment from a nursing perspective. The intent is to provide a coherent description of
relationships, conditions, and practices that foster a healing environment. To achieve this
purpose, a qualitative inquiry was conducted to answer the following questions.

3
 Main Question:
What are the characteristics of a healing environment as described by expert
nurses who practice within the conceptual framework of Rogers’ SUHB?

Related Questions:
What changes in clients did the subjects describe as manifestations of healing?
What conditions and relationships did subjects report as characteristic of healing
environments?
What nursing practices and processes did subjects report as facilitative of client
healing?
For purposes of this study, the following conceptual definitions will be used.

Healing is an endogenous, natural process that facilitates a person, family or

community experiencing innate wholeness. The expansion of consciousness is
key to the healing process and this consciousness is the process through which
healing is extended from the individual to the web of energy field connections.

A healing environment provides the conditions and relationships to support

individual, family, and community healing. Conditions refer to the attendant
circumstances within which healing is expected to take place. Relationships refer
to the nature of the connections between the patient/family and individual
professionals, caregivers, groups, and the organization as a whole.

Theoretical Framework

Rogers’ SUHB was selected as the theoretical framework for this study because
Human-Environmental field dynamics are central to its practice applications and thus
show congruence with the proposed inquiry. Practice relevant research has been
conducted on homeodynamics, mutual process, appraisal and patterning, and voluntary
mutual patterning of human and environmental fields. These terms refer to the principal
components of Rogers’ SUHB, and will be described in this introduction, below. A

4
review of theories derived from Rogers’ SUHB, as well as relevant research based on this
theoretical framework is included in the review of the literature.
The first step in understanding Rogers' Science of Unitary Human Beings is to
comprehend the paradigm from which her theoretical model emerged. In 1970, when
Rogers’ first published her conceptual model, her ideas were considered revolutionary.
Rogers' conceptual system was developed within the context of evolving knowledge in
relativity theory and quantum physics as well as innovative philosophical perspectives
regarding the implicate order of life and evolutionary nature of consciousness. Consistent
with this new knowledge, Rogers described humans as energy fields that manifest a
unique pattern. The environment was also described as an energy field that is integral to
the human field.
Sarter (1988) conducted philosophical research on Rogers' conceptual model. She
concluded that Rogers’ view of reality, centered on energy fields characterized by unique
and ever-changing patterns, was consistent with emerging physics and philosophical
points of view. Rogers identified a number of scientists who influenced her during the
development of her model. Among them were: Einstein (1961), Bohm (1980), and Capra
(1982), as well as several others in the forefront of Relativity and Quantum Theory
development. Sarter identified numerous similarities between Rogers’ world view and
philosopher Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and some Eastern philosophies. Rogers’ view of
reality emerged from a synchrony of physics and philosophy. Bohm’s (1980) conception
of an implicate order within the universe and Teilhard de Chardin’s (1970) contention
that the fundamental stuff of life possesses consciousness were both influences in Rogers’
world view.
These views are consistent with Rogers’ pandimensional view of the world as a
unitary whole consisting of integral energy fields with a dimension of awareness.
According to Sarter’s (1988) analysis, Rogers’ concept of pandimensionality appears to
have been influenced by the concepts of relativity and quantum theories. Sarter also
identified the concept of evolutionary idealism as being very similar to Rogers’ world
view. She defines evolutionary idealism as “the view that the fundamental substance of

5
the universe is consciousness or conscious energy, which is evolving in the direction of
higher, more complex levels of knowledge, feeling and will” (p. 96.). In sum, Rogers’
conceptual model is deeply rooted in a complex and sophisticated paradigm that is
consistent with leading edge discoveries in science, physics and provocative
philosophical perspectives. Rogers’ SUHB reflects her vision for nursing in this emerging
paradigm.
The SUHB conceptual framework reflects the four central concepts in the nursing
metaparadigm. Table 1 provides conceptual descriptions for the SUHB theoretical
framework; the concepts are listed along with their definitions .Within this framework,
reality is viewed as a non-linear domain without spatial or temporal boundaries; it is a
pandimensional unitary whole. Within this unitary whole, an energy field represents the
fundamental unit of existence. The term energy reflects the dynamic nature and the term
field reflects the unified nature of an energy field. All energy fields are dynamic,
continuously moving, evolving, and infinite in nature. There are two field dimensions, the
human field and the environmental field. Each of these fields is an irreducible, indivisible
whole that is identified by pattern. Energy fields are open with free flow between the
human and environmental fields.
The concept of homeodynamics refers to the change dynamics inherent in energy
field processes. Rogers posited that human and environmental field processes are shaped
by three principles of homeodynmaics: resonancy, helicy, and integrality. The principle
of resonancy delineates the direction and flow of change in the energy field: a continuous
flow from lower to higher frequency patterns. The principle of helicy reflects the nature
of change: continuous, unpredictable, innovative and increasingly diverse field motion.
The principle of integrality reflects the mutual process between the environmental and
human energy fields. When caring for a client, the nurse is part of the client’s
environmental field. The nurse and the client relate through mutual process. As a highly
influential part of the client’s environmental field, the nurse is able to partner with the
client in patterning his or her energy field to promote well-being.

6
Table 1: Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB):
Annotated Conceptual Definitions
Energy Field Energy Field is the fundamental unit of existence-living and non-living. The term
energy reflects the dynamic nature and the term field reflects the unified nature of
an energy field, which is in continuous motion and infinitely connected to all other
energy fields.
Human Field: is identified by a unique pattern that manifests characteristic specific
to the whole but which can not be predicted from knowledge of the parts. The human
field is irreducible, indivisible, and pandimensional (Rogers 1990).
Environmental Field: is identified by pattern and is integral with the human field. It
is irreducible, indivisible, and pandimensional (Rogers 1990).

Pattern The distinguishing characteristic of an energy field perceived as a single wave… each
human field pattern is unique and is integral with its own unique environmental field
pattern. Manifestations of field patterns are observable events in the real world. They
are postulated to emerge out of the human – environmental field mutual process
(Rogers 1992).

Openness Energy fields are open, without boundaries to impede energy flow between human
and environmental fields (Rogers 1970).

Pandimensionality A view of reality that is a nonlinear domain without spatial or temporal attributions
that best expresses the idea of a unitary whole (Rogers 1992).

Homeodynamics Refers to change dynamics reflected in human and environmental field patterns. The
three dimensions, also referred to as principles, reflect the direction (resonancy),
nature (helicy) and the process (integrality) of human-environmental field change
dynamics. These dimensions/principles are applicable to group as well as individual
human-environmental fields.
Resonancy delineates the direction of evolutionary change in energy field pattern.
(It) is the continuous change from lower to higher frequency wave patterns in human
and environmental field patterns (Rogers 1990).
Helicy reflects the changes characteristic of the human- environmental fields:
continuous, innovative, unpredictable and increasing diversity in patterns (Rogers
1990; Fawcett 2005a).
Integrality reflects the nature of the relationship between the human and
environmental fields which is a continuous mutual process (Rogers 1990; Fawcett
2005a).

Well Being A term used to reflect the SUHB view of the nursing metaparadigm concept of health.
Rogers did not consider health and illness dichotomous conditions (Fawcett 2005a).
Rogers specified: the multiple events taking place along life’s continuum denote the
extent to which a person is achieving his [or her]…(Rogers 1970).

Nursing A learned profession that encompasses two dimensions: Independent Science of

Nursing and the Art of Nursing Practice (Fawcett 2005a).
Independent Science of Nursing: an organized body of abstract knowledge specific
to nursing based on scientific research and logical analysis (Rogers 1992 and 1994).
Art of Nursing Practice: The creative application of nursing science for human
betterment.(Rogers 1992).

7
 Rogers emphasized nursing as a learned profession that encompasses a science
and an art (1992). She posited that nurses use their science through creative applications
to bring about the well-being of their clients. Pattern recognition and appreciation, mutual
process, and voluntary mutual patterning are key processes (Cowling 1990; Barrett
1998). From a Rogerian perspective, individualization of care is essential to healing.
Technical interventions associated with specific health problems are incorporated into the
client’s care, but do not define the nurse’s practice. The client’s care is based on pattern
appraisal, mutually defined goals, and mutual patterning of the client’s human-
environmental field. Manifestations of pattern changes are observable events that can be
appraised from information, observation, and intuition. In SUHB practice applications,
the healing significance of these pattern manifestations are validated by clients. The
centrality of human-environmental field dynamics in the application of SUHB makes this
conceptual framework compatible with the intent and purpose of this study.

Following Chapters

Chapter 2 provides a review of nursing/health professions SUHB literature

relative to healing environments. Chapter 3 describes the study design and methodology.
Chapter 4 reports the study findings in answer to the research questions: themes inferred
from interviews and characteristics of a healing environment described in an integrative
interpretive narrative form. Chapter 5 provides this investigator conclusions and
recommendations.

8
 CHAPTER 2:

LITERATURE REVIEW

This review of literature includes two components: 1) research and selected

publications identified through an examination of health professional literature
specifically related to healing environments and 2) theoretical and research publications
identified through a search of Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB) literature and
selected for relevance to this study. The purpose of the review was to determine the
general state of knowledge relative to healing environments and to identify salient
findings from research on SUHB nursing applications in creating healing environments.

Healing Environment

The health professions literature reflects little consensus regarding what

constitutes a healing environment. There is the dearth of credible research on the topic. A
search of CINAHL and MEDLINE literature from 1982 through 2007 identified 137
publications related to the topic of healing environment. Of the 137 publications, 53 were
focused on physiological healing topics such as wound healing. Of the 84 publications
relevant to this study, only nine were reports of research studies. Through special search
assistance, additional publications on studies related to specific aspects of a healing
environment were identified. This investigator also included reports regarding a national
dialogue and program of study on Optimal Healing Environments (OHE) that began in
2002. Leaders from the Samueli Institute, a non-profit organization committed to
facilitating and studying healing, fostered this new program development. These reports
include an overview of the concepts, literature reviews, evidence based protocols, and
proposed research recommendations. Reviews of published research reports on healing
environments as well as selected articles providing descriptions or exemplars of healing
environments are included also.

9
 Optimal Healing Environment

The OHE initiatives facilitated by the Samueli Institute have generated a notable
number of publications in the alternative and complementary medicine literature during
the past 5 years. The Institute’s stated goal is to facilitate basic and clinical research in
the science of healing. The following three symposia were sponsored and the
presentations published: in 2003, Definitions and Standards in Healing Research; in
2004, Toward Optimal Healing Environments in Health Care; and, in 2005, Developing
Healing Relationships. Published papers from these symposia have initiated the
development of an organized body of information on the concept of OHE (Chez and
Jonas, 2005).
In a 2007 presentation (August 9), Wayne B. Jonas, the President and CEO of the
Samueli Institute, provided an overview of the OHE program. During his presentation, he
reviewed the institute’s definition of healing and OHE. He also described models used by
the institute for developing an OHE. The definitions were as follows:
Healing: The physical, mental and spiritual processes of recovery, repair
and reintegration that increase order, coherence and holism in the
individual group and environment. Healing may or may not result in cure.

Optimal Healing Environment: A system and place comprised of people,

behaviors, treatments and their psychological and physical parameters. Its
purpose is to provide conditions that stimulate and support the inherent
healing capacities of the participants, the relationships and their
surroundings.

The Samueli model delineates three dimensions of OHE: the inner environment,
interpersonal environment, and outer environment. There are seven goals related to these
dimensions. The personal goals relative to the inner environment are developing healing
intention and experiencing personal wholeness. The social goals of the interpersonal
environment are cultivating healing relationships and creating healing organizations. The
behavioral goals of the outer environment are practicing healthy lifestyles and applying
cooperative medicine. The final goal of building healing spaces appears to bridge all

10
three dimensions and incorporates nature, color, light, art, architecture, aroma, and music.
It is interesting to note that the dimensions of healing identified in the OHE model
parallel subjects found in the general health care literature associated with healing
environments: physical design, organizational conditions, interventions/supports to
facilitate client healing experiences, and relational factors that influence healing.
A series of presentations from the 2004 symposium published in The Journal of
Alternative and Complementary Medicine proposed OHE protocols or integrative
medicine protocols for patients with specific problems and for particular patient
populations, such as the elderly or patients facing end of life health care experiences.
These OHE proposals have broad scope because they integrate curative as well as
complementary health care practices. The proposed guidelines are structured as tools to
facilitate OHE. Most of these OHE guidelines make recommendations for practice as
well as providing direction for outcome evaluation and research on a particular patient
population. OHE guidelines have been developed and published for the following health
care problems: chronic cardiovascular disease (Marshall et al. 2004), trauma spectrum
responses (Osuch and Engel 2004), substance abuse (Wesa and Culliton 2004), chronic
low back pain (Cherkin and Sherman 2004), diabetes mellitus type II (Kligler 2004), and
hypertension (Wesa and Grimm 2004). Though structured in a conventional medical
format, these protocols provide a comprehensive and integrated approach to patient care
that incorporates the creation of a healing environment.

Healing Spaces

Schweitzer et al. (2004) provide an evidence-based, broad scope view of the OHE
concept of healing spaces. The authors address the impact of environment on behaviors,
actions, and interactions. They contend that the design and functionality of space and
organizational behavior have an impact on the client’s intention and awareness,
wholeness and energy, and healing relationships. In their view, personal space is an
important variable in creating a healing environment. Single rooms are considered

11
preferable to facilitate better operations among staff, safe management of medication
administration, and infection control. In addition, Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores
indicate that family and clients are more comfortable in private rooms and report a higher
degree of satisfaction (Kaldenberg 2004).
A recent evidence-based review identifies the sensory environment as another
important factor in creating a healing space (Schweitzer et al. 2004). There is some
evidence that pleasant aromas lower patient anxiety in specific settings and negative
smells or odors have been observed to stimulate anxiety, fear, and stress (Redd 1994).
Noise has been identified as a highly negative environmental characteristic. It increases
patients’ perception of pain and increases the use of pain medication, contributes to sleep
deprivation, and causes confusion and disorientation among some patients. There is some
evidence that noise may contribute to increased lengths of hospital stay (Grumet 1993).
In particular, some research shows noise levels can influence patient outcomes (Yinnon
et al. 1992). The EPA took a position more than 30 years ago that hospital noise levels
should not exceed 45 decibels (dB) during the day and 35 dB at night. The International
Noise Counsel has suggested a maximum of 45 dB for acute care facilities in the daytime,
40 dB in the evening and 20 dB at night. Studies have shown, however, that hospitals
routinely exceed these parameters. Reports indicate that noise levels from 60 to 84 dB
have been measured in intensive care units, and an average nighttime noise level of 67 dB
has been reported in acute care and general medical units (Grumet 1993). A controlled
study of healthy women in a sleep laboratory showed significant disruptions in sleep with
noise levels similar to that in a CCU. There is less evidence on the effect of positive
sounds (Topf et al. 1993).
Light is another important environmental variable, having both a physiological
and psychological effect on patients. Schweitzer et al. (2004) reported extensive evidence
on light’s effect on human chronobiology. The two physiological phenomena reported
most often relative to light variances are circadian rhythm disruption and seasonal
affective disorders. Light naturally affects the circadian rhythm of the body’s
biofunctions by regulating melatonin production and influencing biochemical and

12
hormonal rhythms. Disruptions in these circadian rhythms can negatively affect sleep,
mental focus, and work. Seasonal affective disorders are usually noted when there is a
shorter span of daylight during the year. Seasonal affective disorders cause symptoms of
irritability, fatigue, and depression. Evidence was sufficient to confirm that inadequate
light exposure can have an impact on performance as measured by student test scores
(Heschong 2003). Poorly designed or maintained indoor lighting systems have been
documented to create vision problems, eye fatigue, headaches, and loss of concentration
(Zilber 1993).
In an evidence-based review, Schweitzer et al. (2004) indicated that art and music
also had a positive effect on patients’ healing experiences. Research on art selection
(Ulrich 1993, 1995, 1999) suggests that ambiguous, emotionally negative, or provocative
art should be avoided and that art selected to promote healing should create a sense of
calm and coherence. A considerable body of knowledge exists to support the healing
effect of music. Music has been found to mitigate nausea and emesis in chemotherapy
patients, decrease pre-operative anxiety in infants, improve physiological and behavior
measures in premature infants in the intensive care unit, and reduce the stress of visitors
to hospitals. Music used to facilitate patients’ recovery from surgery decreased the need
for analgesics (Aldridge 2004; Caine 1991; Dubois et al. 1997; Knight and Rickard 2001;
Menegazzi et al. 1991; Moss 1988; Nilsson et al. 2001; Robertson 2000; Wang et al.
2002; Yilmaz et al. 2003).
Lorenz (2007) conducted an integrative review on research relative to patient
rooms in acute care hospitals. The focal point of the integrative review was the extent to
which these rooms had an influence on the promotion, maintenance, and restoration of
healing and well-being for patients. Using a rigorous integrative review strategy, Lorenz
selected 18 studies for review. She defined the concept of healing environment as
follows. “Healing environment is a term that describes the physical and cultural
surroundings that are designed to support patients and families through hospitalization,
medical visits, healing, and bereavement.” (p. 263). Nine studies related specific clinical
outcomes to design characteristics in the environment. The most marked changes noted

13
were in length of stay, utilization of narcotics, and physiological and behavioral
responses (Lorenz 2007).
Two studies of brightness in patients’ rooms found that the patients with the
brighter rooms had a decrease in length of stay (Beauchemin and Hays 1996). Studies
evaluating patient response to noise in the critical care environment found a negative
impact correlation between noise and heart rate response, an increase in heart rate in
response to conversation in the room as compared with background noise, and that
patients sleep better in private rooms in the ICU area (Baker 1993; Baker et al. 1993).
Lorenz (2007) reported results of a study that evaluated the impact of the view from the
patient’s room on postoperative recovery. The findings indicated that patients who had a
window view of trees had better recovery results on the following indicators than those
patients with a view of the brick wall: decreased length of stay, fewer negative chart entry
notes, and reduced need for pain medication.
Altimier (2004) describes the way light, color, noise management, and privacy
were incorporated into the design of a new Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Good
Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati. In addition to the physical design, nursing staff
members were engaged in developing a family-centered culture of service. The physical
design and cultural development created a healing environment that resulted in positive
patient care outcomes and staff satisfaction. While all other factors remained constant, the
change in environment was correlated with improved medical outcomes, decreased
length of stay, decreased hospital costs, and increased family satisfaction. Measurable
improvements were achieved in outcomes associated with two premature birth
complications: intraventricular hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain due to immature
blood vessels) and retinopathy (eye disorder that could lead to blindness). Over a two-
year period, data reflected a 6% decrease in cases of stage 3 and 4 retinopathy and an 8%
decrease in rates of grades 3 and 4 intraventricular hemorrhage. Cost saving estimates
associated with the documented decreased length of stay was $13,114,000 per year.
Anecdotal reports indicated improved family care-taking skills prior to the neonate’s
discharge that resulted in greater satisfaction for both family and staff. This case

14
description provides an excellent illustration of how empirical information can be applied
effectively to make the changes that create a healing environment. These studies provide
compelling evidence that environmental factors affect patient outcomes. The outcome
measures used ranged from physiological parameters (heartbeat) to the cost savings
correlated with reducing incidents of complications. Based on these findings, this
example of a healing environment increased family and staff satisfaction and, at the same
time, improved health outcomes.
A study conducted by Mroczek et al. (2005) confirms the idea that the physical
environment is a key element in the improvement of the healing environment for staff, as
well as patients. The authors examined the effects of the health care environment on staff
satisfaction after a new facility was specifically built to enhance the healing environment.
The study involved a survey of 700 employees. Respondents were most positive about
the increased natural light in the new building, the music provided, and air flow.
Homelike patient rooms were also rated as positive or very positive. The circular design
of the building and the art work were rated less positively, but there were no ratings in the
negative range. The study findings confirmed that health care staff valued the design
features that enhanced healing experiences.
In summary, the evidence provided supports the contention that sensory factors as
well as structural design influence the healing potential of patient care environments. The
use of healing spaces, which incorporate nature, color, light, music, art, aroma, and
design, is a core construct in creating healing environments.

Complementary Healing Modalities

The general nursing literature reported several studies of healing modalities as

part of the creation of a healing environment. These modalities include relaxation
techniques, comfort touch, music, movement, aromatherapy, and massage. Relaxation
techniques studied were qigong, self-hypnosis or johrei, and mantra repetition. Hui et al.
(2006) conducted a study that compared the physiological and psychosocial impact of

15
qigong and progressive relaxation techniques. Sixty-five subjects were assigned to one of
two groups. One group was trained in qigong, and the other in progressive relaxation.
The results indicated that the qigong group showed greater improvement in psychological
factors and systolic blood pressure. Both groups improved on quality of life assessment.
Laidlaw et al. (2005) compared relaxation responses among three groups, one assigned
self-hypnosis, one johrei, and one served as a control group. Outcomes were evaluated
using mood and quality of life tests prior to the training and again, three months or more
afterward. The findings indicated that both relaxation methods enhanced the healing
environment, raised energy levels, and decreased anxiety. Bormann et al. (2005)
evaluated the efficacy of frequent mantra repetition on stress, quality of life, and spiritual
well-being of 65 veterans over a five-week period. The subjects were given a pre- and
post-test using a self-report questionnaire that measured stress, anxiety, anger, quality of
life, and spiritual well-being. Mantra repetition as a relaxation exercise resulted in
significant improvement in all variables measured.
Two studies conducted on comfort touch were reported: one on the
institutionalized elderly and another on clients with cancer. Butts (2001) conducted a
study on forty-five elderly female nursing home residents who were divided into three
groups. The treatment group had five minutes of comfort touch (handshake, hand
holding/touching, and shoulder touch) and conversation twice a week for four weeks.
One control group had no treatment or intervention and the other control group had only
verbal interactions. Data were collected at the beginning of the study, two weeks later,
and two weeks after that, at the end of the study. Comfort touch improved perceptions of
self-esteem, well- being, social processes, health status, life satisfaction, self-
actualization, faith/belief, and self-responsibility. Weze et al. (2004) evaluated the
healing experience of a gentle touch reported by 35 clients with cancer. The subjects had
four 40-minute sessions of non-invasive touch on the head, chest, arms, legs, and feet
within a six-week period. They were given a questionnaire before the first treatment and
at the end of the study period. The most significant improvement showed reduced stress
and increased relaxation. It also showed measurable increases in pain reduction.

16
However, the results did not indicate an improvement in feelings of panic, anger,
disability, or immobility.
Sandel et al. (2005) conducted a dance and movement program designed to
measure improvement in quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Thirty-five women
completed the trial that included a 12-week intervention. The study design was a
randomized controlled trial with a wait list control group allowed to cross over to active
treatment in weeks 13 to 25 of the study. The Lebed method that focuses on healing
through movement and dance was used as the dance program intervention. Three
outcome measures were evaluated: breast cancer quality of life, shoulder range of motion,
and body-image scale. All three measures showed improvement while the subjects were
dancing and immediately after treatment. The same degree of improvement was seen in
healthy women who completed the same dance program.
Hays (2006) studied the impact of music on the well-being of people 60 years old
and older. The author used two focus groups to develop an in-depth interview. One group
included five subjects from varied backgrounds who listened to music, but who did not
play any musical instrument. The second group was composed of eight amateur
musicians. Based on the information gleaned from the focus groups, interviews were
conducted with 30 subjects, age 60 to 98. Fourteen had no music skills, 12 were amateur
musicians, and 12 were professional musicians. According to the interviews, the subjects
used music as therapy to relieve stress, endure pain, release their emotions, and as part of
specific activities. The social aspects of music were important to all three groups. Hays
found that music contributes to a sense of well being and helps people cope with illness
and disability whether they are listeners or musicians.
Fellowes et al. (2007) conducted a meta analysis on the use of aromatherapy and
massage for symptom relief in patients with cancer. The authors retrieved 1,322
references in an exhaustive and extensive literature search, but only ten articles both met
the inclusion criteria and were randomized controlled trials. These 10 articles covered
eight separate research studies and included 357 patients. The studies all showed the
consistent benefit of reduced anxiety after massage. The authors reported that one study

17
indicated a reduction in depression, three indicated a reduction in pain, and two indicated
a reduction in nausea. The benefits of the addition of aromatherapy were inconclusive.
In summary, all of these studies indicated that the use of complementary
modalities contributes to the healing environment and facilitates healing experiences for
patients. In clinical settings, nurses are frequent providers of the modalities described
above. Nursing research on healing modalities applied by nurses specifically practicing
within Science of Unitary Human Beings theoretical framework will be included in the
second section of the literature review.

Spirituality as Environmental Influence

Six spirituality studies and one concept analysis were reviewed from the healing
environment literature. Four studies and the concept analysis reported findings relative to
spirituality in managing oncology patients, one study focused on prayer after stroke, and
one study was about spirituality in the lives of domestic violence survivors.
Villagomeza (2005) conducted a concept analysis on spiritual distress in adult
cancer patients. She noted that although generally unacknowledged, spiritual distress in
cancer patients is widespread, and that only 28.9% of the nurses interviewed in another
study indicated that they made a nursing diagnosis of spiritual distress .She also reports
that nurses do not generally discuss spiritual matters with patients. The author provides
cues for recognizing spiritual distress and provides case studies that illustrate varying
degrees of distress. The author proposes that nurses enhance the healing environment by
recognizing spiritual distress and taking action to address the problem.
Schneider and Mannell (2006) studied spirituality and faith as coping mechanisms
for parents of children with cancer. This research examined the role of spirituality, both
secular and religious. Subjects completed a background questionnaire and kept a time
diary, as well as participated in an in-depth interview. Most felt that spirituality provided
support and that faith and prayer were important. These researchers concluded that the

18
availability of faith resources could enhance the healing environment for some patients
and their families.
Laubmeier et al. (2004) conducted a study on the role of spirituality in the
psychological adjustment to cancer. The subjects appraised the level of life threat they
were experiencing. These life threat appraisals, rather than cancer stagings, were used to
categorize study responses. The findings indicated that the higher the degree of
spirituality the client reported the less distress and better quality of life he/she reported–
regardless of perceived life threat. Existential well being (meaning in life) was reported to
be more important than religious well–being for this group.
Sherman et al. (2005) conducted a 2-year longitudinal study on patients diagnosed
with advanced cancer or AIDS. These patients and their family care givers were assessed
to measure their spiritual well being as a dimension of quality of life. Subjects were
referred to the study by a primary care physician, oncologist, AIDS specialist, or
advanced practiced nurse. Each patient in the study was followed monthly from diagnosis
and referral until death. Each month the subjects completed a questionnaire that took
about one hour. Based on study findings, the authors posited that the hospice philosophy
of providing spiritual support as part of palliative care was validated. They also
concluded that a healing environment for these terminally ill patients required a spiritual
component structured to be responsive to the individual within the context of his/her
disease process.
Kristeller et al. (2005) studied the impact of oncologists who assisted with
spiritual interventions for their patients. In this study, patients were assessed prior to the
visit, immediately after the visit, and three weeks later. Using measures of quality of life,
spiritual well-being, communication skills, religiosity, and depression, 76% of the
patients in the spiritual group found the talk with their oncologist somewhat useful or
very useful. The physicians were comfortable having the spiritual conversation with 85%
of the patients. The assessment at three weeks showed a decrease in depression and an
increase in quality of life. Overall, the intervention was positive and patients felt a sense
of caring on the part of the physicians. The majority of patients found the spiritual

19
intervention somewhat or very useful. The intervention also seemed to enhance
patient/physician relations with this particular group of patients.
Gillum et al. (2006) conducted a study of 151 female domestic violence survivors
to determine the importance of spirituality in their lives. The authors measured the degree
of physical and psychological abuse, depression, quality of life, social support, self
esteem, and spirituality. The study provided further evidence that spirituality has an effect
on well being and enhances the healing environment. The research supports the notion
that spirituality is a significant factor in client resilience and the ability to recover from
traumatic life events.
Robinson-Smith (2002) studied the impact of prayer on subjects who had
experienced a stroke. The qualitative study included eight subjects from varied religious
orientations. Seven of these eight subjects reported prayer was a significant factor in their
recovery.
The studies described above indicate that spiritual support can be an important
component of a healing environment. Although one study indicated that nurses do not
routinely discuss spiritual matters with patients, findings from other studies indicate that
many patients are open and responsive to communications about spiritual matters. In
fact, Gauthier (2002) found that a “return to spiritual roots” was identified by a sample of
terminally ill clients as a facilitative pattern in creating a healing experience (p. 225).

Organizational and Relational Influences

Health care delivery in the United States is characteristically specialized, high

tech, standardized and impersonal. Health costs are equivalent to14% of the nation’s
GNP and approximately 50% of worldwide health expenditures are in the United States.
Yet, the United States ranks 26th worldwide on health care indicators and 54% of the
United States population surveyed are dissatisfied (Lafferty 2004). The Institute of
Medicine (IOM) has called for a major redesign of health care to achieve six aims: safe,

20
effective, patient centered, timely, efficient, and equitable health care. To achieve these
aims, the IOM (2001) committee recommended implementation of 10 principles:
1. Care is based on continuous healing relationships
2. Care is customized according to patient needs and values
3. The patient is the source of control
4. Knowledge is shared and information flows freely.
5. Decision making is evidence-based
6. Safety is a system property.
7. Transparency is necessary.
8. Needs are anticipated.
9. Waste is continuously decreased.
10. Cooperation among clinicians is a priority.

These principles reflect a focus on developing organizational norms consistent with

relationship based, patient centered care.
Other factors driving change in health care delivery are the shift in population
demographics, health care needs, and growing recognition that patient engagement is
essential to positive outcomes. The prevalence of chronic diseases is increasing due to
extended life expectancy and an aging population base. Chez and Jonas (2005) point out
that these changes in health care needs require a shift from acute care focus to an
emphasis on “maintenance functions and relief of suffering” (p. S-3). Positive outcomes
for the chronically ill require that the patient and family develop self-management skills
in making day to day decisions (Wagner et al. 2005). This means the “healing landscape”
is expanded to include a variety of places, people, experiences, and influences in the
patient’s life. “The concept of a healing landscape shifts the focus from healing in the
encounter and/or practice to healing within each patient’s life space.”…”The healing
landscape focuses our attention on the multiple relationships that participate in the
emergence of healing” (Miller and Crabtree 2005, p. S-45). Within this landscape, the
health care provider’s effectiveness in communicating determines his/her influence on
health outcomes. In a study of 500 patient-physician encounters, patients who indicated
they received adequate communications about their symptoms and prognoses reported
increased satisfaction with their experience, less worry, fewer unmet expectations, and

21
reported better outcomes relative to their symptoms two weeks after the encounter
(Jackson et al. 2005)
Relationship Centered Care (RCC) is a concept consistent with the notion of a
healing landscape. Beach et al. (2006) provides a clear summary of the concept:
Relationship-centered care is health enhancing. It is founded upon, proceeds
within, and is significantly influenced by the web of relationships that promote
the well-being, and full functioning of patients. In RCC, the patient is often our
central concern, but is not considered in isolation from all others. Instead, while
the clinicians’ first responsibility is to prevent and alleviate illness, we do this
work mindful of the contributions of the family, our team, our organizations, and
our community to what can be accomplished. Similarly, we must be mindful of
the impact of what we do with patients on the well being of all others involved,
including their integrity, functional capacity, resilience, and financial stability.
Finally, we do this work in full knowledge that our own well-being and function
need to be sustained if we are to continue to serve others vigorously (p. 57).

The RCC concept emerged from the work of the Pew-Fetzer Task Force on Advancing
Psychosocial Health Education (1994) and since that time, RCC initiatives have been
implemented in education, research, and clinical practice.
Four RCC models were selected for review. Two of the models provide matrices
that describe patterns illustrative of various relationship states. Beach et al. (2006)
describes characteristics associated with clinician-patient, clinician-clinician, and
clinician-community relationships in the following realms: knowledge; approach,
philosophy, and attitudes; behaviors; and outcomes. These descriptions clarify the nature
of these various relationship dimensions. Malloch and Moore (2000) structured a matrix
delineating the 5 stages for developing expertise in becoming a health care relationist.
This matrix was based on Benner’s novice to expert framework (1984). Manning-Walsh
et al. (2004) developed a model that reflects 5 ascending levels of RCC focus and
engagement: self focus – commitment to personal growth, respect and care for self; self-
other focus- reflects commitment to shared relationship; reciprocal learning focus-
engagement in equitable, alternating learning from each other; mutuality focus-
developing synergy and co-creating within relationship; and transformed relational
capacity-an enhanced ability to connect with others. This model reflects the expansion of

22
focus and engagement in relationships as it moves from one level to the next. Safran et al.
(2006) describes the organizational dimensions of RCC and reports evidence linking the
following outcomes with positive organizational culture and relationship patterns:
improved patient outcomes, decreased length of stay, improved workforce morale and
decreased turnover, and reduced mortality in settings with effective collaboration.
Caring characteristics can be identified by assessing individual and organizational
patterns. Duffy. (2007) conducted a descriptive study of 557 adults from five acute care
institutions to determine the independent factors relative to the concept of caring and how
these factors explained variance in caring. This information was then used to evaluate the
psychometric properties of the caring assessment tool. Eight independent factors were
identified: mutual problem solving, attentive reassurance, human respect, encouraging
manner, appreciation of unique meanings, healing environment, affiliation needs, and
basic human needs. Healing environments defined in accordance with Watson’s (source)
theoretical framework of caring include “the mental, physical, socio-cultural, and
spiritual elements in a setting” (p. 10). It is interesting to note that of all the variables,
mutual problem solving explains the largest percentage of variance relative to caring
behaviors. The authors described the mutual problem solving category as hospitalized
adults appreciating nurses who helped them understand their health and illness. “Implicit
in this factor is providing information, teaching and learning, as well as using best
evidence.” (p. 8)
Fenton (1987) developed and tested the Scale of Humanistic Behaviors based on
Howard’s Model (1975), to provide a framework for assessing environmental conditions
within health care organizations. The model proposes three categories of conditions
reflective of humanistic behaviors: ideological, structural, and emotional. Ideological
conditions are the cognitive behaviors of recognizing inherent worth, irreplaceability, and
the holistic nature of persons. Structural conditions reflect the interaction patterns of
freedom of action, status equality, and shared decision making and responsibility.
Emotional conditions are patterns of empathy and positive affect. Fenton (1997) reported,
“Humanistic behaviors by nurses are most highly correlated with area of practice, type of

23
unit and collegial environments.” (p. 34) Humanistic behaviors exhibited by staff and
organization patterns provide the context for a healing environment.
Leadership is also cited as an important factor in creating the conditions for a
healing environment (Belanger 1996; Kerfoot and Neumann 1992). Malloch (1997)
studied the relationship between staff perceptions of a healing model application in the
clinical setting and their job satisfaction. She found that nurses practicing within the
context of a healing model were more satisfied and had a positive effect on organizational
outcomes. Exemplars of two organizational models are described below: the Plain Tree
Model and the Relationship Centered Care Model.
Komarek (2004) provides an exemplar of a Plain Tree Model that has been
operational since 1989. This particular example is located in a long-term care facility and
the author identifies the nine components that make up their Plain Tree environment: a
supportive environment, physical involvement of family and friends, physical
environment, respect for the individual, access to information, participation, choice,
human environment, and autonomous decision-making. The Plain Tree Model is
characterized by openness, especially open access to information so that patients and
families can be participants in their care. Patients and their families also have access to
library and Internet resources to become informed about health issues and options. Dr.
Komarek credits the Plain Tree Model with the high level of patient satisfaction and
employee satisfaction at this facility.
Taylor and Keighron (2004) describe how implementation of the relationship
centered care model helped in their hospital’s transition from a negative to a positive
environment over a 15-year period. The culture and image now is one that is
characterized as a healing environment. This organization case narrative discusses how
they moved from a contentious organization that made negative headlines in the late
1980s and early 1990s to an organization with a focus on relationship-centered care and a
healing environment. In the course of the transition, they developed a process for change
and developed a healing environment model that addressed internal and external issues

24
requiring change. The authors describe the transition as moving from a fear-based culture
to a nurturing culture.
.Relationships and organizational philosophy, norms and culture are major factors
in creating a healing environment. The Fetzer-Pew Task Force on Relationship Centered
Care and the Institute of Medicine recommendations to focus on healing relationships and
patient centered care have ignited a national movement toward a greater degree of client
sensitivity and engagement. Since Nightingale, nursing has defined its central role in
creating a therapeutic relationship with the client/patient. A major nursing function is to
integrate objective information into the context of the client’s subjective experience to
facilitate healing (Swanson et al. 2004). Research supports the positive effects of a
healing environment on health outcomes. Relationships are recognized as central in
creating a healing environment, and yet there are limited studies on healing relationships
per se (Quinn et al. 2003).

Summary

This review of literature encompassed scholarly and research publications on

healing environment from the general health professions literature. Though there are
pockets of valuable information, the current conceptions and approaches to creating a
healing environment reflect ambiguity and fragmentation of efforts. The limited studies
published are focused on aspects of the environment rather than the whole of the
environment. Therefore, there is not a substantive body of research on the healing
environment. O’Malley (2005) points out that “the climate is harsh for studying healing
environments. The current background and context of health care delivery is largely
chaotic and dysfunctional” (p. S-19). He identified key barriers to research on healing
environments: no established career paths for investigators, lack of funding sources, and
insufficient data to quantify research need. The new (OHE) publications emerging in the
integrative medicine literature offer a more coherent framework for facilitating research
on what constitutes a healing environment. However, the OHE studies and protocols are

25
shaped by medical model assumptions (focuses on diagnosing and treating
diseases/problems) and publications center on physician roles. The medical model
orientation of the OHE initiative limits its relevance to other disciplines.

Healing Environment in the SUHB Literature

This section of the review of literature includes theories derived from and
research conducted using the Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB) conceptual
model that relate to creating a healing environment. From a search of CINAHL and
MEDLINE databases, this investigator found 626 references published in the nursing
literature between 1982 through 2007. Of those, 201 were research publications.
Theories and research findings specific to elements of this study were selected for
inclusion in this review. This section of the review is organized into a component on
theories derived from SUHB and a component on relevant research studies. The research
component is further divided into three parts: studies focused on the principles of
homeodynamics, studies focused on mutual process, and studies focused on pattern and
patterning.

Theories Derived from the Science of Unitary Human Beings Framework

Rogers' Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB) Conceptual Model has

generated six grand theories, twelve middle-range theories, and numerous research
studies and practice applications. Fawcett (2005a) describes and organizes the
components of nursing knowledge into a hierarchy according to level of abstraction. A
conceptual model is identified as the most abstract theoretical component of the nursing
knowledge hierarchy and is defined as “a network of concepts that accounts for broad
nursing phenomena” (King and Fawcett 1997, p. 93). Rogers Science of Unitary Human
Beings (SUHB) is a conceptual model. Theories consist of concepts and propositions that

26
reveal relationships among the concepts; “…”theories vary in levels of
abstraction…grand theories are more abstract than middle-range theories but less abstract
than conceptual models” (Fawcett 2005a, p.1 31). Young et al. (2001) explain that a
theory “describes the nature and workings of a model”…and provides guidelines for
analyzing phenomena and interpreting research findings relevant to study phenomena (p.
11). Grand or general theories present a broad scope view of nursing and its phenomena;
mid-range theories present a limited scope view relative to an aspect of nursing that
focuses on selected phenomena. In her criteria for evaluating nursing theories, Fawcett
(2005a) differentiates the methodologies for testing grand and middle range theories.
Fawcett posits that qualitative, inductive methodology is an appropriate method for
testing the philosophical claims and concepts expressed in grand theories. She also
suggests that an important indicator of grand theory relevance is the extent to which it
generates mid-range theories that can be applied to practice. Fawcett proposes that mid-
range theories be tested through the use of instruments designed to measure empirical
indicators of the concepts being studied. The following provides an overview of grand
theories and mid-range theories derived from the Rogers Science of Unitary Human
Beings Conceptual Model; research on both grand and mid-range SUHB theories has
been conducted and reported in the literature.
Three of the six grand theories derived from the SUHB were developed by Rogers
and the other three were developed by nurses who studied with Rogers. Fawcett (2005a)
characterizes Rogers’ grand theories as rudimentary derivatives of her conceptual model.
Two of these theories relate to specific dynamics of change. The Theory of Accelerating
Evolution proposes that evolutionary change is speeding up, increasing in diversity and
proceeding towards higher wave frequency patterns that tend to create new norms
(Rogers 1980, 1992). The Theory of Rhythmical Correlates of Change focuses on the
integral rhythms of the human and environmental fields. This theory posits that “humans
and their environmental fields evolve and change together” (Rogers 1992, p. 32). Rogers’
Theory of Paranormal Phenomena explains extra-sensory and trans-personal experiences
within the context of pandimensionality, which is characterized by absence of temporal

27
and spatial boundaries. Pandimensionality also is proposed as one of the operant concepts
supporting the use of alternative modalities of healing, such as: Therapeutic Touch and
imagery. These Rogerian theories are usually referenced and applied in association with
the conceptual model of SUHB
The grand theories developed by Parse, Fitzpatrick, and Newman are all
consistent with the unitary paradigm and assume or adopt several SUHB concepts
(Fawcett 2005a). Parse’s (1992) Theory of Human Becoming was derived from the
SUHB model but also was heavily influenced by existential phenomenology. Her theory
focuses on persons’ lived experiences, their views on health, and proposes that people co-
create their health experiences. Parse’s theory has three central principles and nine
assumptions. The principles’ themes reflect the focus of the theory: 1) structuring
meaning, 2) co-creating rhythmical patterns, and 3) transcendence. Parse and her students
have developed research and practice tools to facilitate use of her theory. Fitzpatrick’s
(1988) Life Perspective Rhythm theory, derived from SUHB, posits that human
development occurs within human-environmental fields and rhythms indicative of this
development include consciousness, perceptual motion, and temporal patterns.
Newman’s Theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness is a grand theory derivative of
SUHB. According to Newman (1994), the nurse client relationship is a partnership in the
mutual process of expanding consciousness. In her theory Newman describes this
relationship as a three-step process: 1) the meeting which typically occurs because the
client needs help and is at a “choice point”, 2) the nurse and client connecting through a
shared state of consciousness, and 3) the nurse and client “moving apart” (p. 112).
Frequently the nurse meets the client because the client is ill and needs nursing care.
Newman (1990) views disease as a”… reflection of the pattern of energy exchange
between man and environment “…and is an integrating factor that provides the tension
necessary for developing consciousness (p. 168). From Newman’s theoretical
perspective, health challenges serve to move persons towards expanded levels of
consciousness.”

28
 Fawcett (2005a) identifies twelve middle-range theories derived from SUHB. As
indicated above, mid-range theories are derived from conceptual models or grand
theories, focus on specific phenomena, and are empirically tested. Mid-range theories
bridge the gap between grand theories and practice. The following lists SUHB mid-range
theories that have been studied and published:
• Power as Knowing Participation in Change (Barrett 1986)
• Theory of Human Field Motion (Ference 1986)
• Theory of Sentience Evolution (Parker 1989)
• Theory of Creativity, Actualization, and Empathy (Alligood 1991)
• Theory of Self-Transcendence (Reed 1991, 1997)
• Theory of Kaleidoscoping and Life’s Turbulence (Butcher 1993)
• Theory of Enfolding Health as Wholeness & Harmony (Carboni 1995)
• Theory of Healthiness (Leddy and Fawcett 1997)
• Theory of Perceived Dissonance (Bultemeier 1997)
• Theory of Aging (Alligood and McGuire 2000)
• Theory of Enlightenment (Hill and Hatchet 2001)
• Theory of the Art of Professional Nursing (Alligood 2002)

Empirical studies of SUHB middle-range theories relevant to creating a healing

environment will be described in the following component.

Research Relevant to Principles of Homeodynamics

Homeodynamics, a core SUHB concept, refers to change dynamics exhibited

within and by energy fields. The concept of homeodynamics has three associated
principles: helicy refers to the nature of change which characteristically is continuous,
innovative; unpredictable and increasing in diversity; integrality refers to the process of
change which is continuous and mutual between human and environmental fields; and
resonancy refers to the direction of change which is evolving with the frequency moving
from lower to higher frequency wave patterns. In the SUHB conceptual model, these

29
principles are central to creating healing changes within the human-environmental fields.
A substantive amount of research has been conducted to test and further delineate human-
environmental field dynamics. A number of researchers developed mid-range theories on
human-environmental fields based on the principles of homeodynamics. They developed
instruments and empirical indicators to test their theories. Several of these studies
provided useful information about the nature and dynamics of changes within the human-
environmental fields. Research instruments have also been developed to measure changes
and pattern manifestations associated with specific SUHB practice applications.
Fawcett and Alligood (2006) reviewed research instruments and clinical tools
developed specifically to investigate and facilitate SUHB practices. They found that 13
SUHB research instruments were available. The instruments fall into the following
design categories: 4 semantic differential scales, 2 visual analog scales, 5 Likert scales,
and 1 structured interview tool. Five of the instruments are designed to elicit client
perceptions and /or experiences of human environmental field dynamics: the Human
Field Motion Test, the Perceived Field Motion Scale, the Index of Field Energy, the
Person Environmental Participation Scale, and the Human Field Rhythm Scale. The
Power as Knowing Participation in Change Tool (PKPCT) assesses a person’s capacity to
change through the use of semantic differential ratings of awareness, choice, freedom to
act intentionally, and involvement in creating changes. This tool has been applied in a
wide range of situations. Leddy’s (1996) Healthiness Scale is a Likert Scale that
measures the person’s perceived purpose and power to achieve goals. The ratings include
meaningfulness, ends, choice, challenge, confidence, control, capacity, capability to
function, and connections. The Temporal Experiences Scale, which is also a Likert Scale,
measures subjective experience of time awareness as an indicator of human-
environmental process influences. McCanse’s (1995) Readiness for Death Instrument is a
visual analog scale that measures the physiological, psycho-social and spiritual aspect of
healthy field patterns as death is developmentally approaching. The Human Field Image
Metaphor Scale measures the individual’s awareness of the infinite wholeness; in the
clinical setting, this is usually observed as expanded awareness and a sense of connection

30
with self, others and a greater whole. The Diversity of Human Field Pattern Scale, which
is a Likert rating, measures diversity of human field patterns or the degree of change in
the evolution of human potential throughout the life process. Assessment of Dream
Experience, through a Likert rating, measures dreaming as a beyond waking experience.
The reviewers located one clinical tool which is relevant to this study. Carboni (1992)
developed this interview tool to conduct a nurse-client mutual exploration of the healing
human environmental field relationship. It measures the nurse and the client’s
experiences and expressions of changing configurations of energy field patterns of the
healing human environmental field relationship. This investigator found the interview
tool used in Carboni’s study helpful in developing interview guide questions for this
study.
In addition to the research tools, Fawcett and Alligood (2006) compiled and
evaluated information on clinical tools designed to facilitate application of nursing
practice and processes consistent with concepts in the SUHB. These tools are designed to
guide nurses through the application of SUHB processes to assure that assessment,
practice modalities and evaluation are conducted and documented in an appropriate
manner. These clinical tools are categorized based on their client focus: individuals,
families, or groups/communities. Two individual assessment tools are generic and three
are designed for specific populations, i.e. post-partum mothers, older adults, clients with
chronic pain. Two tools are designed for families and two for groups or communities.
These clinical tools provide guidance for assessing selected individuals, families, and
groups and can be used as a source of aggregate data in assessing trends.
Dykeman and Loukissa (1993) conducted an integrated review on early studies
testing SUHB theory. Of the 20 studies reviewed, 12 focused on one of the principles of
homeodynamics (resonancy-direction of change, integrality-process of change, or helicy-
nature of change), 2 of the studies addressed a combination of 2 of these principles. Six
of the studies were designed to test concepts from various SUHB theories. Only 3 of the
40 instruments used in these studies were specifically designed to measure SUHB
concepts. The other 37 instruments had been designed to measure generic concepts

31
related to change or environmental processes. The outcomes revealed that hypotheses
were completely supported for 5 studies, hypotheses partially supported for another 10,
and hypotheses not supported for the remaining 5. Dykeman and Loukissa concluded that
use of instruments not sensitive to or designed to measure SUHB constructs had been a
factor in the study outcomes. Of the 3 studies conducted using tools designed specifically
for SUHB research applications, hypotheses were fully supported in 2 of the studies and
partially supported in the third. The authors raised questions about the impact of
instrument design on study outcomes. The following briefly describes the 5 studies in
which the hypotheses were fully supported and specifies the SUHB concepts used as
theoretical base:
• Alligood based her study of the relationship of creativity, actualization, and
empathy on the principle of helicy (1986);
• Cowling based his study of the relationship of mystical experience
differentiation and creativity on the principle of helicy (1986);
• Ference based his study of the relationship of time experience, creativity
traits, differentiation and human motion on the principle of resonancy (1986);
• Smith based her study on the relationship of perceived restfulness and varied
auditory input on the principle of integrality (1986); and
• Barrett’s study on the relationship between human field motion and power
was supported and reflected the principle of helicy (1986).
The authors of this integrated review made the observation that their work reflects the
importance of having research instruments designed to measure specific concepts being
studied (Dykeman and Loukissa 1993). In describing criteria for evaluating mid-range
theories, Fawcett (2005b) also points out the importance of having empirical indicators
that are appropriate measures for the concepts being evaluated.
Barrett’s (1986) mid-range Theory of Power as Knowing Participation in Change
has been applied in a wide range of situations. As indicated earlier, this theory is based on
the homeodynamic principle of helicy, which reflects the nature of change in human
environmental fields. According to Barrett (1998), power is defined as “being aware of

32
what one is choosing to do, feeling free to do it, and doing it intentionally” (p. 9). Barrett
developed a highly reliable tool that measures a person’s capacity to knowingly
participate in change. The tool is a semantic differential scale designed to rate the four
“Power as Knowing Participation in Change” theory concepts: awareness, choices,
freedom to act intentionally, and involvement in creating changes. The scale provides
options for rating each concept within three contexts: myself, family, and occupation.
The Power as Knowing Participation as Change Tool (PKPCT) is used both as a practice
tool and a research instrument.
Barrett (1998) conducted an integrative review on studies using the PKPCT and
reports that these studies show a positive correlation between power measured by the
PKPCT and the following variables: “Human field motion”-reflective of changes in the
energy field-“ life satisfaction, purpose in life, well-being, self-transcendence,
spirituality, perspective-taking, imagination, perceived health, and socio-economic
status.” Studies showed an inverse correlation between power as knowing participation in
change and the following variables: “Personal distress, chronic pain, environmental
factors, anxiety, previous crisis, injury severity, and hopelessness” (p. 14). Qualitative
studies using the tool tended to focus on patient role and decision-making patterns.
Studies conducted on nurse subjects showed a correlation between power and leadership
effectiveness, imagination, and empathy.
PKPCT theory and rating scale are relevant to measuring healing environment
characteristics because the measurement of this concept can facilitate determining the
extent to which the client is likely to participate in the healing process. An assessment
attained by using the tool can provide the information base needed to facilitate increased
client engagement in the healing process. As indicated by the results reported in this
integrative review, Power as Knowing Participation in Change has been an influential
mid-range theory among SUHB practitioners and researchers. The PKPCT has been used
to examine the nature (helicy) direction (resonancy) and process (integrality) of change in
a variety of applied research studies (Caroselli and Barrett 1998). These study findings

33
support that client engagement in human-environmental field change processes is
essential to healing.

Mutual Process

Mutual process is essential to creating a healing environment. Human

environmental field changes that facilitate healing occur through mutual process, the
dynamic reflective of the principle of integrality in the SUHB framework. Dr. Delores
Krieger (1994) described this as the SUHB’s most important contribution to nursing
knowledge: “Without a doubt, the greatest gift the Rogerian framework gave to nursing
was to clearly define the essence of concern in professional nursing practice – unitary
human beings in mutual process with their environment.” (p. 45) Dr. Kreiger pointed out
the nurse’s responsibility for being centered and staying focused on this process. “This
would mandate that the nursing practitioner, as healer, be in a constant state of
mindfulness about the dynamics of the ongoing mutual process” (p. 55). Davidson (2001)
used the metaphor “fingerprints on copper” to describe nursing’s role in the human-
environment mutual process. She posits that changes made by the environment on copper
are similar in process to the environmental influence of nurses on the human field.
The nature of the nurse-client relationship is fundamental to establishing a mutual
process that facilitates healing. Relationships are the key to creating connections that lead
to an awareness of wholeness. According to Quinn (1992), “When true healing occurs,
relationship is re-established – relationship to and within self, to others, with one’s
purpose” (p. 26). Quinn coined the term “right relationships” to describe this connection
within oneself and with meaningful others. This section of the review includes SUHB
values and relational concepts that impact the mutual process of creating a healing
experience.

Art of Nursing Theory

Relational patterns and values exhibited in practice behaviors are associated with
the art of nursing. Alligood (2002) derived a theory of the art of nursing using

34
interpretive hermeneutic research techniques in examining Rogers’ publications. Through
this process, Alligood identified three values inherent in Rogers’ writings which are
foundational to the art of nursing practice: respect inherent in the relationship between
the nurse and the client, responsibility for designing and implementing individualized
client care services, and empathy as a “feeling attribute of the continuous person-
environment process” (p. 58). Rhodes (1990) conducted a study of nursing art using a
hermeneutic research technique comparing nursing values with Sparshott’s characteristics
of classical and expressive lines of art. Among the attributes of classical nursing arts were
caring, presence, advocacy, empathy, imagination, and healing. Interpersonal expression,
intuition and intentional use of one’s self have been identified as attributes of expressive
nursing art (Jenner 1997; Rhodes 1990) and these attributes are explicitly or implicitly
found in SUHB or unitary paradigmatic research.

Empathy

In 1992, Alligood proposed two types of empathy: basic and trained. She
described basic empathy as a natural feeling reflecting a trait and trained empathy as a
learned role taking form associated with developing clinical or professional roles. Evans
et al. (1998) studied the difference between basic and trained empathy and the
sustainability of trained empathy. The investigators assessed a sample of 106
baccalaureate nursing students at the beginning, during, and at the end of their
educational program. Study findings indicated that educational efforts to teach trained
empathy did not result in the nurse acquiring an enduring capacity to apply empathy in
the clinical setting. Basic empathy was proposed to have greater potential for developing
therapeutic empathy. The researchers recommended that nurse educators build creatively
on identified basic empathy levels of entry student nurses in designing learning
experiences rather than relying solely on role specific educational strategies.
Peloquin’s (1996) research on empathy suggests the basis for such a strategy.
From the perspective of a Professor of Occupational Therapy, Peloquin describes
parallels between art appreciation and expressions of empathy. Art is seen as a way of

35
eliciting emotional response and sensitizing the participant. Peloquin describes “three
actions that works of art elicit from those who produce or appreciate them: a) a response,
b) emotion, and c) connection. It can be argued that each of these actions resembles the
actions of empathy.” (p. 656) In addition to these actions, Peloquin further identifies
“three rules that may dispose a person toward empathy: reliance on body senses, use of
metaphor, and occupation by virtual worlds” (p. 658). The actions and rules suggested by
Peloquin offer a framework for a creative educational approach to developing empathy
among students. This approach appears consistent with suggestions made by Evans et al.
(1998) relative to building on natural feelings in developing therapeutic empathy.
Alligood and May (2000) proposed a theory of empathy specifically designed for
nurses based on King’s concept of interacting systems. “this nursing theory of
intrapersonal empathy proposes that empathy organizes perceptions; facilitates awareness
of self and others; increases sensitivity; promotes shared respect, mutual goals, and social
awareness; cultivates understanding of individuals within a historical and social context;
and affects learning” (p. 245-246). Walker and Alligood (2001) compared the use of a
“borrowed theory” of empathy, Kohut’s self psychology model, with this nursing theory
of empathy to determine if there were significant differences in their applicability for
nursing. Findings indicated that the nursing theory of empathy provided advantages to
nursing practice. Within a nursing context, empathy can influence conceptualization of
the nurse’s role and how she/he executes it.

Presence

Finfgeld-Connett (2006) used SUHB with other unitary theoretical models as a

framework in the conduct of a meta-analysis of presence in nursing. Presence is a concept
has been explicitly or implicitly incorporated into a number of nursing theories, including
the SUHB. Finfgeld-Connett points out, however, that it is a concept that is not fully
defined and is often confused with other concepts such as caring, empathy and
therapeutic use of self. Their meta-analysis included 14 qualitative studies and 4

36
linguistic concept analyses. One of the outcomes of this study was a synthesized
description of presence:
Presence is an interpersonal process that is characterized by sensitivity, holism,
intimacy, vulnerability and adaptation to unique circumstances. It consists of a
process in which patients demonstrate a need for openness to presence. In turn,
nurses must be willing to enact presence and practice within an environment that
is conducive to it. Nurses must also possess personal and professional maturity
and base their practice on moral principals of commitment and respect for
individual differences. The process results in enhanced mental well being for
nurses and patients, and improved physical well being for patients. In keeping
with the nature of a process, the consequences of presence go on to influence
future enactment. (p. 708)

Nursing “presence” has been broadly identified as a relational factor in creating

an environment supportive of healing. Paterson and Zderad (1976) describe presence as
“a mode of being available or open in a situation with the wholeness of one’s unique
individual being; a gift of self which can only be given freely, invoked or evoked” (p.
122). McKinnergin and Daubenmire (1994) differentiate three levels of presence:
physical presence (being there), psychological presence (being with), and therapeutic
presence (a whole person to whole person relationship between the nurse and patient).
Quinn (1992) characterizes this type of presence as the nurse providing sacred space for
the patient within the environmental field; a place where the patient can be loved (or
cared for) during his/her vulnerability and through the change process.

Caring

Like presence, caring is a concept that is broadly referenced in nursing literature.

Smith (1999) conducted a study to examine indicators of congruence between the
literature on caring and SUHB. Through a systematic concept clarification process, Smith
proposed a “synthesis of five constituent measures of caring within the SUHB:
manifesting intentions, appreciating patterns, attuning to flow, experiencing the infinite,
and inviting creative emergence” (p. 14). After this publication, dialogue regarding caring
as a concept within the SUHB conceptual framework continued as evidenced in both
published literature and dialog at meetings of SUHB scholars. In 2002, Watson and

37
Smith conducted a comparative analysis of Watson’s Theory of Transpersonal Caring
and SUHB. From this effort, they proposed an integration of intersecting concepts into
four unifying statements supportive of a trans-theoretical perspective of transpersonal
caring within a SUHB frame. The following trans-theoretical tenets are proposed
(Watson and Smith 2002):
• The intention of transpersonal caring expands in open, resonating, concentric
circles from self to other to Planet Earth to universe. It includes caring
consciousness, and participating knowingly in human-environment energy
field patterning;
• The nurse’s authentic presence, consciousness and intention in a caring
moment manifests caring field patterning;
• The nurse’s presence and caring consciousness potentiate change in the field,
by co-creating human-environment patterning from lower frequencies to
higher frequencies (i.e. caring consciousness carries higher energy frequencies
than noncaring consciousness);
• Transpersonal caring resides within a field of caring consciousness and energy
that transcends time, space, physicality, and is one with the universal field of
consciousness (spirit) – the infinite (p 458).

The integration of these theoretical perspectives was offered as providing significant

opportunities for research and practice applications.

Intentionality

Zahourek (2005) developed a grounded theory on intentionality and healing

which she posits is consistent with Rogerian theoretical concepts and is firmly rooted in
the unitary world view. Her findings described the evolutionary development of healing
intentionality within the nurse-client mutual process of patterning a healing modality.
Zahourek’s conception of intentionality differs from the causal notion of intent as a
focused awareness to achieve a specific outcome. The predominant attribute of
Zahourek’s theory is the development of three forms of intentionality that compose the
matrix of healing which reflects three phases of capacity development:1) generic
intentionality which is characterized by a drive for relief, 2) healing intentionality is the
“goal directed” phase focused on repair; and 3) transformative intentionality which
evolves from self development and creates shifts to “experience of wholeness,

38
connections and meaning in the universe” (Zahourek 2005, p. 107). The assumption is
that the more developed the nurse’s capacity of intentionality, the more she/he is able to
support the healing evolution of the client.

Nurse-Client Healing Relationship

Carboni’s (1995) practice theory, Enfolding Health as Wholeness and Harmony,

is relevant to this research study because it explores healing as a characteristic of the
nurse client relationship and as a goal in patterning the human environmental field.
Carboni’s practice theory introduces several new concepts derivative of the SUHB and
reflective of Bohm’s (1980) conception of an implicate order. (underlying unity and
wholeness) and explicate order (observable discrete objects, events, etc.). Carboni
describes the nurse- client mutual process focused on the evolutionary movement of
energy within the client’s human environmental field. This field shift moves from a
“fragmenting place” in which the client experiences field fragmentation and disharmony
to a “healing place” in which the client experiences wholeness and harmony. The
movement from fragmentation to wholeness is accomplished through homeodynamic
principles operant in facilitating the shift in the human environmental field pattern.
Carboni developed an instrument to measure unitary constructs associated with the
implementation of her theory. This instrument is a semi-structured interview tool
designed to explore the nurse client healing relationship. The tool has two major
components:
1) An experience component in which the client and the nurse are asked to
describe their experiences and
2) An expression component which is designed for the nurse and client to search
together for a metaphor that represents their relationship.
There are a number of cues and variables that facilitate the description of experiences and
the selection of expressions that are mutually reflective.
In addition to her practice theory and structured interview tool, Carboni developed
a process of inquiry design that is consistent with the philosophy of Science of Unitary

39
Human Beings. As indicated earlier, this practice theory and instrument were useful
sources in developing the design of this study and interpreting the findings. Carboni’s
study involved obtaining descriptions from a nurse and client who shared a healing
experience. This study was designed to acquire descriptions from expert nurses that
represented a pattern of healing experiences. Though there were clear differences in the
studies, Carboni’s approach assisted this investigator in developing interview questions
for the nurses that elicited rich descriptions of client manifestations.

Spirituality and Healing

Walton (1996) proposed that all relationships, especially the nurse-client

relationship, have the potential to include a spiritual dimension. Nurses are present when
clients and their families face illness, death, suffering and the opportunity to heal; these
are inherently spiritual and/or transformational experiences. From her concept analysis on
spiritual relationships, Walton synthesized a definition: “a spiritual relationship may be a
relationship to self, others, a higher power, or nature in which one behaves
humanistically, has a sense of responsibility and personal identity, and describes the
relationship as producing intimacy, wholeness, and wellness” (p. 242). Spiritual
relationships, as described by Walton, facilitate healing through mutual process.
Several Rogerian scholars (Malinski 1991; Smith 1994; Hills and Hanchett 2001)
have linked spirituality to the principles of hemodynamics (particularly integrality) and
the concept of pandimensionality. Malinski (1994)describes the flow of these processes
and manifestations: “Pandimensional awareness of the mutual human/environmental field
process (integrality) is a manifestation of higher frequency patterning(resonancy)
associated with innovative, increasingly creative and diverse(helicy) experiences of what
is called spirituality”(p. 17). Based on her research, Smith (1994) described the
manifestation of spirituality as “interconnectedness with all life including a transcendent
dimension” (p. 41). As a major influence on the human-environmental mutual field
process, the nurse has the opportunity to foster spiritual experiences as well as recognize
spiritual manifestations of the healing process.

40
 The SUHB research reviewed in this section reflect the key role of mutual process
in influencing human-environmental field dynamics. In order to create an effective
mutual process, the nurse and client must connect. These studies reflect processes
involved in developing a therapeutic nurse-client relationship and the significant
influence the nurse-client relationship has on creating a healing environment.

Patterns and Patterning

Pattern appraisal and deliberative mutual patterning are central to practice within
a SUHB framework. Alligood and Fawcett (2004) conducted a hermeneutic interpretive
study on Rogers’ conception of pattern and patterning. Rogers (1990) defined pattern as
the “distinguishing characteristic of an energy field perceived as a single wave”. Alligood
and Fawcett found that patterning was a term used to refer to visible manifestations of
patterns. From their research, they defined patterning as “the dynamic or active process
of the life of the human being. Manifestations of patterning are visible or otherwise
accessible to the senses.” (p. 11) A complete review of the SUHB literature on patterning
is beyond the scope of this study. Studies selected for this review reflect the impact of
pattern and patterning on creating a healing environment.
Fawcett (2005a) described the SUHB practice methodology based on the works of
several Rogerian scholars: E. A. M. Barrett, M. Bogulawski, H. K. Butcher, W. R.
Cowling, III. This methodology describes the Rogerian approach to assessment, selection
and application of practice modalities and evaluation. Pattern manifestation knowing
(assessment phase) focuses on appraising human and environmental field patterns,
interpreting their meaning and significance, and setting mutual goals. Voluntary mutual
patterning (intervention phase) reflects the nurse and client’s response to the pattern
appraisal. The nurse and client partner to determine action required. The nurse integrates
individualized and creative nursing modalities to facilitate healing while incorporating
technical care associated with resolving health problems. The evaluation phase of care
involves re-appraisal using pattern manifestation knowing and appreciation approach.
During this phase the nurse and client mutually determine progress towards goal

41
achievement and choices relative to additional patterning. Several Rogerian scholars have
developed practice inquiry and research processes specifically designed to study patterns
and patterning. Cowling’s (2001, 2004) appreciative inquiry process is an example.
Nurses practicing within a Rogerian framework have pioneered practice theories
and modalities that facilitate pattern changes and healing experiences. In some instances,
practice modalities have been adapted to make them congruent with SUHB conceptual
framework. These modalities may involve the use of one or more of the following: subtle
energy techniques, motion, sound, light, color, humor, relaxation, nutrition, affirmation,
art and nature, bibliotherapy or journaling. Eight studies have been included in this
review to illustrate how these types of modalities can be used by the nurse and client in
voluntarily patterning the human-environmental fields. Pattern manifestations indicating
the nature and extent of the changes also are described.
Therapeutic Touch (TT) is an example of a well known SUHB practice modality..
Kreiger (1993) developed TT, a mutual process subtle energy modality that facilitates
healing changes in field patterns. TT has been researched and demonstrated in a variety
of settings throughout the world; numerous publications are available describing studies
focused on various populations and problems. The following study was selected for
inclusion in this review because it is a good example of the TT patterning process and
documents pattern manifestations indicative of changes. Garrard (1995) conducted a
study on subjects who were HIV positive to determine the effectiveness of TT in re-
patterning their immune and coping responses. Garrard selected CD4 (T-helper
lymphocytes) count levels to assess the subjects’ immune system status. .He selected the
Coping Resource Inventory for Stress (CRIS) to assess subjects’ coping responses.
Statistical analysis revealed a significant improvement in the subjects’ CD4 counts as
well as an improvement in the subjects’ coping skills as a result of TT therapy.
Barrett (2003) describes imagery as “the universal language of the mind that uses
the imagination to think in pictures, sounds, smells, or touch sensations.”…Then
describing the modality within SUHB frame of reference, she further states.
Imagery exercises transport us from the domain of logical, causal,
conceptualization to the analogical, acausal realm of pandimensional

42
 spacetimemotion (sic)where they facilitate the seeing and doing of possibilities.
The motion is not physical; rather, it is unitary human field motion, which I define
as perceptual experience of the continuously moving position and flow of the
human field pattern. Light, color, sound and motion can arise spontaneously in
imagery or can be introduced in exercises designed for use in healing (p. 1).

Two studies on imagery are included to illustrate the impact of nurse-client

voluntary patterning using guided imagery. Lewandowski (2004) conducted a study to
determine the influence of guided imagery on the patterning of pain and power in clients
with chronic pain. The findings showed that guided imagery was effective in reducing
chronic pain, but did not have a statistically significant impact on increasing their sense
of power. Thompson and Coppens (1994) conducted a study to determine if guided
imagery would alter the patterns of clients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. The
focus was on identifying pattern manifestations of anxiety levels and movement. Based
on the subject reports and operator reports, the experimental group had less movement
during the MRI testing activity, and they demonstrated a lower level of state anxiety than
the control group.
Bray (1989) investigated the relationship among creativity, time experience, and
mystical experience as pattern manifestations. The study was conducted on 193 college
students. The findings did not support the hypothesized relationship between creativity
and mystical experience or between creativity and timelessness for the subjects group as
a whole. However, significant correlations were found between mystical experience and
both timelessness and creativity for participants who practiced meditation techniques,
prayer or relaxation. The differences in pattern manifestations appeared to be associated
with the subjects’ engagement in meditative type experiences.
Yarcheski et al. (2004) conducted a study to examine the relationship of perceived
field motion and human field rhythms to perceived health status, health conception and
well being in early adolescents to determine which health related variables are most
compatible with the SUHB. The sample was 142 early adolescents who used the study
instruments in their classrooms. The findings in this study indicated a statistically
significant correlation between perceived health status and conception of well being and

43
human field motion. The notion that pattern manifestation can be observed, measured and
used as an inference for the client’s status was suggested by study findings.
Krause (1991) investigated the impact of a specifically designed nursing
intervention tailored for a pulmonary rehabilitation education program on the field
patterning of a group of individuals with dyspnea. Clients who were exposed to the
education program did not show any increase in their power profile. However, they did
show a positive pattern change in the level of dyspnea. A pattern emerged permitting
identification of three progressive check stages during the course of the study: awareness,
acceptance and adjustment. Additional variables identified as part of the pattern
manifestation were hope, trust, courage, openness, patience, honesty as well as relevant
knowledge and skills. The researcher reported findings indicating support for the SUHB
principles of integrality, helicy, and resonancy.
Wall (2000) investigated the affects of a pre-operative exercise program on
changes in pattern manifestations of hope and power among 104 lung cancer patients.
There was a control group and an experimental group. The group that exercised
demonstrated an increase in their sense of power, while the no exercise group
demonstrated a decrease in their sense of power. However, there were no differences
identified in the patterns of hope.
Camp et al. (2002) examined the affects of therapeutic massage on perceptions of
pain, sleep quality, symptom distress and anxiety, and patients hospitalized with cancer.
The study was designed as a comparison between a group of patients who received
massage and a similar control group who received only interactions with the nurse. The
findings indicated that pattern manifestations relative to pain, sleep quality, symptom
distress and anxieties showed improvement for the subjects who received therapeutic
massage, and only anxiety improved for the patients in the control group. The findings
support the use of massage with patients who are receiving chemotherapy or radiation
therapy.
Patterning “involves the mutual participation of client and nurse in a caring
partnership” in using non-invasive healing modalities to facilitate positive change in the

44
client’s human-environmental field. (Malinski 1997, p. 115). Healing modalities include,
but are not limited to, Therapeutic Touch, imagery, meditation, affirmations, story-
telling, dream interpretation, healing rituals, and movement (Madrid and Barrett 1994).
As indicated by the finding above, these modalities provide observable, measurable
changes in the client’s conditions. Nurses frequently employ these modalities in response
to client’s symptoms, conditions, or interests. Using SUHB framework, Hanley and
Fenton (2007) describe nursing improvisation of care employing such modalities to bring
comfort and create healing experiences.

Summary

The SUHB literature reflects the centrality of nursing in creating a healing

environment and the conceptual model appears to provide a coherent framework for
research and practice. Research on human-environmental fields, nurse-client mutual
process, and human-environmental field patterning are specific in delineating the nurse’s
role in creating a healing environment. The distinction between healing and curing is
reflected in research and clinical application reports. Based on the literature review, it
appears the SUHB conceptual model is frequently used as a theoretical framework for
research. Though there are numerous reports of individual SUHB practice application
projects, there is less evidence of broad based applications in clinical settings. More
frequently, the investigator found that aspects of the SUHB conceptual framework were
integrated into practice models or used in outcome evaluations of healing modalities.

45
 Literature Review: Relevance to the Study

Research found in the general health professions literature was limited to studies
of aspects of the environment and did not address influences reflective of the
environment as a whole. The research on physical influences was discrete from research
on relational influences which was discrete from specific intervention influences.
However, organizational models cited in the literature incorporated several of these
aspects of a healing environment (e.g. physical and relational). Evaluations demonstrated
that these healing environment models improved selected client outcomes as well as
client and staff satisfaction. This investigator found the research applications of
environmental influences in these models useful in developing context for experiences
described by study participants. The Optimal Healing Environment (OHE) publications
offer a more coherent framework for studying healing environments and facilitating
clinical applications. The OHE literature informed this study by providing an integrative
medical model lens on the concept of a healing environment. Based on the view through
this lens, this investigator considered the potential OHE influence on creating norms for
healing environment models and the impact that could have on nursing roles.
The SUHB literature emphasized nursing’s role in creating a healing environment
and provided research supporting the theoretical constructs relative to human-
environmental field processes. Research on mutual process and patterning provided
baseline information for developing inferences and interpreting interview data about
subjects’ experiences in developing relationships (mutual process), engaging client’s in
patterning, and in describing manifestations of healing. Research on the principles of
homeodynamics was useful in linking this study’s findings with SUHB theoretical
concepts. This investigator discovered notable congruence between research findings
reported in the literature and findings from this study.

46
 CHAPTER 3:

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

This study was conducted using a qualitative descriptive method (Parse 2001)
with an interpretive approach as delineated by Thorne et al. 1997) and consistent with the
naturalistic inquiry model (Lincoln and Guba 1985). Interpretive description was selected
because it encourages the use of existing knowledge, derived from formal research or
clinical experience, to guide inquiry and provide a foundation for linking study findings
to the broader base of nursing knowledge (May 1989; Morse 1994b; Thorne et al. 1997).
Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB) was used as the theoretical
foundation for the study. Consistent with an interpretive descriptive approach, the
theoretical foundation of SUHB was used as a context for the inquiry rather than a
structure for organizing the study. This provided the freedom necessary for inductive
analysis of findings (May 1989; Thorne et al. 1997). A semi-structured interview was
used to collect data. The analysis process included immersion in the data, identification
of salient descriptions, extraction of natural meaning units (NMU) from salient
descriptions, categorization of descriptions, identification of themes, and, finally,
integrative interpretation of themes and interviews as a whole. The outcome is an
interpretive description of the study phenomena (Morse 1994c; Thorne et al. 1997).

Human Subject Protection

The UTMB Institutional Review Board approved this study as a category 7

project which is defined as research on individual or group characteristics or behavior.
The methodology, interview tool, specified processes for managing the data and
maintaining confidentiality and structured communications were reviewed and approved

47
(documents provided in Appendix A). Study participants were provided detailed
information about the study and participation expectations. Potential subjects were
contacted initially by telephone; the investigator described the study intent, expectations
of the subjects and clarified questions. Subjects were sent e-mails or letters confirming
their agreement to participate and informed that consent to be a study subject was
affirmed by their participation. All subjects were assigned a pseudonym prior to their
interviews to ensure confidentiality. Findings are reported in a manner that protects the
identity of the subjects. Interview transcripts, tapes, demographic profiles, and data
worksheets have been maintained in a locked storage in the investigator’s office. When
all aspects of the study concludes, the data base and work materials will be shredded and
disposal conducted in a manner that assures that confidentiality is not breached.

Methodology

Sample

A purposeful sample of expert nurses who practice within the framework of

Rogers Science of Unitary Human Beings was selected. Consistent with naturalistic
inquiry principles, the sample was selected for the purpose of maximizing rather than
generalizing information. In this same vein, the sample size was determined when
information redundancy occurred (Lincoln and Guba 1985). Morse (1994a, p. 182)
suggests that studies designed “toward discerning the essence of experiences include
about six participants….” This investigator reviewed reports on four studies focused on
interpreting specific experiences. Sample sizes in those studies ranged from 6 to 15
(Rashotte et al. 1997; Takman and Severinsson 1999; Zerwekh 2000). A sample of nine
subjects was included in this study, achieved, as noted above, through information
redundancy.
Morse (1994a) points out that a good informant is someone with the requisite
knowledge and experience desired for the study and is also someone with the ability to

48
reflect in an articulate manner. To increase the probability of selecting good informants,
this investigator developed criteria for choosing a purposive sample. Since the study was
designed to elicit observations and interpretations from expert nurses who practice within
Science of Unitary Human Being conceptual framework, the criterion for selecting the
sample focused on identifying nurses who would be good informants. The first criterion
was that selected subjects would acknowledge she/he practiced using a SUHB
orientation. Since human-environment mutual process is a core construct in SUHB,
theory, this investigator posited that nurses who practice using this framework are more
likely to have reflected on how their practice as a nurse relates to the client and his/her
environment. The second criterion was a requirement that subjects would have published
about their practices in credible professional journals or other scholarly sources. It was
posited that nurses who have published about their practices have demonstrated their
capacity to be knowledgeable, reflective and articulate informants about their practice
applications.
The initial subjects were identified from two listings compiled by Fawcett (2000):
“Published Reports of Research Guided by the Science of Unitary Human Beings” (pp.
390-395) and “Published Reports of Clinical Practices Guided by the Science of Unitary
Human Beings” (pp. 398-400). Ten potential subjects were identified for the study. Seven
were identified from a critical review of the publication listings specified above. Three
were identified from recommendations made by subjects recruited early in the process.
Recommendations were elicited in order to identify subjects that would broaden the mix
of clinical backgrounds in the subject pool. Whether subjects were identified from the
literature or recommended, each one was assessed to ensure she/he met the stated criteria.
This investigator reviewed potential subjects’ publications and presentations to determine
evidence of expertise, reflective patterns, and ability to articulate. One of the subjects
withdrew during the interview because the subject decided that her recent limited
participation in practice made it difficult for her to answer the questions; she had been,
she noted, a full-time researcher for several years.

49
 The final sample consisted of nine doctorally prepared expert nurses who practice
within the theoretical framework of SUHB. All participants were Anglo--Saxon females
with over 30 years of experience in nursing. Clinical backgrounds represented in the
sample include: acute care, community health, mental health, substance abuse and
women’s/infant care. Four of the subjects are faculty members who maintain clinical
practices. One holds a clinical leadership role in an acute care setting; four are in private
practice and/or consultation roles. Four are within the 51-60 year old age range and 5 are
60 or older. Four are married, three divorced, one widowed and one single. The nine
subjects live in eight different states: 2 in New York, 1 in Massachusetts, 1 in North
Carolina, 1 in Georgia, 1 in Florida, 1 in Texas, 1 in Colorado and 1 in Idaho. All have
published on their practice. Six have developed and researched practice modalities and/or
theories derived from SUHB.
Clearly, this sample is not representative of the general nursing population and is
relatively homogeneous in terms of ethnicity, gender, and age. Selection criteria were
structured to identify good informants. There were no criteria specified relative to
demographic mix or personal characteristics. The variance in geographic distribution
occurred by chance but does provide a breadth of regional perspective in the sample. This
is an older, professionally mature sample of nurses with proven practice and inquiry
expertise.

Data Collection Procedure

Potential subjects were contacted initially by telephone; the investigator described

the study intent, expectations of the subjects and clarified questions. If a potential subject
expressed interest, she was sent a letter describing the study, requesting the subject’s
participation, and indicating that the investigator would telephone at a mutually agreeable
time. Enclosed with the letter was a form requesting professional and demographic
information Approximately two weeks after the mail out, this investigator called each
potential subject to discuss the study and what was desired and expected. When the
potential subject agreed to participate, she was asked to complete and return the

50
demographic profile and was informed that her participation in the study was indicative
of consent. At that time, a pseudonym was assigned to ensure that the subject’s identity
would remain anonymous on tape recordings, transcriptions, and other records used in
data management. When a date for the telephone interview was established, the subject
was emailed confirmation of the interview, a description of the recording process, and an
overview of the interview plan. (See Appendix A)
This investigator used a semi-structured tool designed to elicit information
necessary to answer the research questions (copy in Appendix A). These telephone
interviews were audio-taped and transcribed. The transcriptions were sent via email to the
subject for verification and clarification. Two subjects requested hard copy transcriptions
to be sent by mail. The investigator reviewed the subject’s feedback, made necessary
additions and corrections, and analyzed the transcript in accord with the specified data
analysis process. In five instances, a second follow up call was made to further clarify
information. One subject added an exemplar to her interview.

Data Analysis

According to Thorne et al. (1997), interpretive description “…requires that nurse

researchers come to know individual cases intimately, abstract relevant common themes
from within these individual cases, and produce a species of knowledge that will itself be
applied back to individual cases.…The inductive analysis and interpretive process is
characterized by immersion in the data, synthesizing, developing conceptualizations, and
addressing the…dialectic between individual cases and common pattern…” (p. 175).
After reviewing Thorne (1991) and Parse’s (2001) guidelines for analysis of a qualitative
descriptive design, this investigator chose to augment those general data analysis
guidelines with a more structured process. Kvale’s (1996, pp. 193-204) approach to
interview analysis was selected because it is consistent with the general processes
described by Thorne and Parse. This approach also adheres to Thorne’s (1991) call for
using processes that pose questions about the overall meaning of the data as the means

51
for data reduction, display and interpretation rather than using complex coding systems
and small unit data reduction.
The following summarizes the interview analysis process that was used in
accordance with the sequence described by Kvale.(1996, pp.193-204):
1. Meaning condensation: Each interview was distilled into “natural meaning
units”. These natural meaning units (NMUs) were given labels reflecting
general subject categories.
2. Meaning categorization: The NMUs were sorted into like categories. The
categories were reviewed for themes; theme categories were distilled and
synthesized several times.
3. Narrative structuring: The interviews were evaluated as “wholes” to determine
the story inherent in each individual interview. This was used to enhance
theme interpretation.
4. Meaning interpretation: Themes and patterns were interpreted within the
framework of SUHB.
The investigator substantiated the trustworthiness of this study by ensuring that the four
criteria conventionally associated with establishing rigor in qualitative research were met:
credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability. These criteria were
synthesized from several detailed descriptive discussions about qualitative research (Beck
1993; Guba and Lincoln 1989; Koch 1993; Lincoln and Guba 1985; Slevin and Sines
1999). A study auditor provided process oversight, facilitated investigator reflection and
objective engagement with the subjects, and reviewed the analysis process. Criterion
specifications and the methods used to meet each criterion are described below:
Credibility: a study is deemed credible when it faithfully presents the experiences
and reported reality described by the study subjects. Five processes are used to
establish credibility.
• Reflexivity-accounting for the impact of the investigator’s
perspectives: The investigator debriefed regularly with a selected study

52
 auditor in order to minimize the impact of investigator bias on the
study process and interpretations.
• Verification by study participants: As indicated in the previously
described procedure, study participants were asked to verify interview
transcripts and provide clarification when needed during the analysis
process.
• Well-defined description of data collection and analysis processes: The
process was structured and executed in accordance with qualitative
standards and Kvale’s process guidelines. This process is described in
detail.
• Data management structured to reflect decision trail from interview
materials through interpretations: A process map was used and
monitored by the study auditor.
• Coherence of interpretations: consistency in logic was demonstrated in
decision steps and validated by the study auditor.
The study auditor has graduate preparation in nursing and holds a PhD in the

humanities. This auditor was selected for her expertise and experience in critically

appraising qualitative research. The auditor employed historical research methods in

completing her dissertation and has been a Principal Investigator on several complex

projects that used both qualitative and quantitative methods. As a faculty member, the

auditor has had extensive experience in reviewing scholarly papers. The auditor had no

previous background with the subject of healing environments or SUHB and was

therefore more able to provide an objective point of view.

Transferability reflects the extent to which the study findings or propositions can
be applied to another context. To assess transferability, the study participants and
context must be adequately described. A detailed description of study subjects and
context for the study is included.

53
 Dependability refers to the quality and consistency of the processes used to
determine findings. A study auditor was designated to determine if the database
and decision trail adequately substantiated study findings and interpretations. The
auditor verified each process step, reviewed findings and validated interpretation
logic.
Confirmability refers to evidence that processes and decisions clearly reflect the
way interpretations were determined. Confirmability is established through the
concomitant achievement of credibility, transferability and dependability.
Credibility, transferability and dependability have been substantiated through
processes described above.

Limitations of the Study

There are several limitations of this study. The first relates to the composition of
the study sample. All subjects are doctorally prepared nurses who practice within a
Rogerian theoretical framework, are expert practitioners, and have documented practice
scholarship in professional publications. This sample is not reflective of the general
nursing population. The advantage offered by this sample is that the subjects were highly
skilled at observing phenomena, interpreting and communicating its meaning. They were
the appropriate subjects for generating answers to the research questions. Practicing
nurses who wish to use outcomes of the study are likely to view the subjects as quite
different from themselves. In addition, they may view the use of SUHB as a barrier to
transferability if they are not familiar with this theoretical base or do not use any
theoretical framework in their practice. Interpretative presentations and publications may
be required to make the study outcomes useful to the practicing nurse.
There were several challenges associated with data collection. The investigator
and study participants were not able to interact face to face due to geographic distances.
All interaction between the investigator and study participants occurred via telephone,
email, fax, or postal service. This restricted data collection since face to face exchanges
often generate additional communication and data. Telephone calls were tape recorded

54
and transcribed to facilitate accurate communication. Subjects were able to review and
refine transcripts to decrease potential distortion. Email and mail correspondence have
been maintained in confidential subject files for reference and can be accessed to validate
analysis outcomes. Due to the investigator’s personal illness leave, there was a 5 year
delay between the initiation and completion of this study. As a result, four subjects had to
be reengaged in the process when the study was resumed. Information was updated and
the subjects were willing to bridge the time gap.

55
 CHAPTER FOUR:

FINDINGS

This chapter presents findings related to the research questions posed for this
study of the characteristics of a healing environment as described by nine expert nurses
who practice within the theoretical framework of Rogers’ SUHB. These questions are as
follows:
Main Question:
What are the characteristics of a healing environment as described by expert
nurses who practice within the conceptual framework of Rogers’ SUHB?
Related Questions:
What changes in clients did the subjects describe as manifestations of healing?
What conditions and relationships did subjects report as characteristic of
healing environments?

What nursing practices and processes did subjects report as facilitative of

client healing?

Findings are organized according to research questions. The three related research
questions cited above served as the basis for developing the semi-structured interview
tool used in gathering the data for this study. The subjects’ responses to the interview
questions were analyzed, recurring themes inferred, and themes categorized to
correspond with these three related study questions. This investigator synthesized the
thematic findings relevant to these three questions into an integrated interpretive narrative
response to address the main question. The findings answering the research questions are
reported in the same sequence as the findings were derived: related questions answered
first and then the main question. Quotes from subject interviews were selected and
included in answers to illustrate thematic patterns. Subject quotes are indented and
single-spaced; the quotes were not edited. Brackets were used to indicate entries by the
investigator intended to clarify the meaning of quotes extracted from the interview texts.
Table 2 provides a listing of themes per research question. Appendix A provides

56
transcript excerpts illustrating the subjects’ recurrent response patterns that formed the
basis for inference of the defined themes.

Table 2: Themes responsive to related research questions

What changes in clients did the subjects describe as manifestations of healing?

Recognizes the need for change and demonstrates intent to change

Engages knowingly in reorienting and mutually patterning the energy field

Expresses sense of expanded awareness and sense of connectedness with self, others, and
a greater whole

Exhibits observable and intuitively understood human field pattern changes

What conditions and relationships did subjects report as characteristic of healing

environments?

Right relationship with self and meaningful others

Intentional mutual process

Energetic influences from collective relational experiences

Client centered design

Healthy nursing culture facilitates a healing environment

Philosophically grounded, open and in search of meaning

What nursing practices and processes did subjects report as facilitative of client healing?

Theory based practice

Nurse as environment

Appraisal and mutual patterning

Nursing art of designing care

57
 Answers to Related Research Questions

What Changes in Clients did the Subjects Describe as Manifestations of Healing?

Four themes were identified from subjects’ responses describing changes in

clients that the subjects perceived to be manifestations of healing. The subjects provided
a consistent perspective on context: the client’s experience of healing is always defined
by the client. This paradigmatic view stands in stark contrast to the conventional health
service model in which the provider diagnoses the client’s problem, prescribes how to fix
the problem, and specifies the outcome parameters indicative of successful resolution of
the problem. In the conventional model, the client is referred to as a patient, a term that
often reflects his/her passive role in the health care management process. It is noteworthy
that in these findings, the term client is used to reflect that the nurse is providing a
professional service to a person actively engaged in the process of healing. Though the
subjects’ responses acknowledged the need for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions,
their approaches integrated those aspects within their understanding and application of
the SUHB framework and practice methodology. Each of the following four themes
reflects the subjects’ focus on the centrality of the client in defining the process and the
experience of healing.

Recognizes the Need for Change and Demonstrates Intent to Change

The client’s recognition of the need to change and his/her demonstration of intent
to change were reported as an initial and essential manifestation of the healing process.
Constraints or dissonance in the energy field create an awareness and impetus for change.
The recognition of the need for change leads to intentional efforts to make this change
occur. This intent may be reflected by the client’s openness to information and
willingness to seek new alternatives. The client’s intent reorients his/her energy field
toward the process of healing. Two excerpts from Subject W’s transcript are
representative of the responses from which this theme was derived:

58
 …recognition is the beginning of healing. You don’t have real healing as I’m
describing it without that recognition. So the key to movement toward the healing
experience is the person recognizing that something needs to change…

I think one of the most important things in healing is the sense of purpose and
meaning and direction. This also comes from one’s unique intentionality. Intent to
change is immensely important. We tend to change our orientation. When we
change our orientation, the direction of the energy flow changes because we’ve
shifted. We’ve made a conscious decision to do things differently. When we do
this, energy changes, the patterns change, and the manifestations of patterns
change.

Engages Knowingly in Reorienting and Mutually Patterning the Energy Field

Knowing engagement in reorienting and mutually patterning his/her energy field reflects

the client’s perceivable movement from intent to active engagement in making changes in

his/her human-environmental energy field that manifest healing. Subject responses

relative to this theme were clearly rooted in the unitary paradigm, SUHB theoretical

concepts/practices, and derivative SUHB theories (e.g. Power as Knowing Participation

in Change). As this theme implies, the subjects reported client-nurse mutual patterning of

the human-environmental energy field as a means of facilitating client healing. Basic to

this process is the assumption that the client and environment are integral energy fields

and the nurse is part of the client’s environmental field. When the nurse and client share

mutual intent, the mutual patterning of both their energy fields are potentiated. The nurse

contributes professional knowledge and skills, information, options, support, and focused

energy to the mutual patterning process. The nature of the nurse’s support and

participation is responsive to the individual client’s human field pattern, which includes

his/her illness or health concern. The client engages and focuses healing through

59
 knowingly participating in the change process. Whatever nursing practices are used,

either conventional or alternative, the client is an aware, knowing, active participant who

makes choices relative to the changes to be made. Mutual patterning facilitates shifts

from lower to higher energy frequencies within the client’s energy field; higher frequency

energy waves increase the rate of the change process. The following three excerpts are

representative of the responses from which this theme was derived:

…it all starts with the person’s capacity to look at possibilities and make choices
around those [possibilities]…and how much energy [the person] has at that
moment. As a nurse, I had better be able to enter into [that person’s] world so that
I can understand [the person’s] energy and meaning [of this experience] and
help…explore that.…So the degree [to which the person] can claim the
possibilities, you see [him/her] coming into a healing mode. We’re engaging the
energy to help them move to a new state of being. It is partly my energy and
partly their energy and partly universal energy. It is moving them to a new state of
being. (Subject V)

There are four dimensions of power (awareness, choice, freedom to act

intentionally, and involvement in creating changes). This power enables clients to
knowingly participate in change. Information enters the patient’s field and allows
them to participate in creating change. First, they gather the information and look
at their options and then they get necessary information that helps to shift their
directionality. …So people who are moving towards healing are people who are
usually shifting from lower to higher power choices and from less awareness to
more awareness, from lesser freedom to act on their intentions to greater freedom
to act on their intentions. And in involving themselves in ways that help them to
get to where they want to go. (Subject M)

“ When you are engaged and you know you are and they know you are, things
move quicker – it speeds up – it’s like the whole process of getting well…goes
more rapidly. (Subject C)

This theme reflects the extent to which the SUHB framework defines how these subjects
view the primacy of the client‘s power and the mutuality of the nurse-client process in
bringing about energy field changes that are healing in nature.

60
Expresses Sense of Expanded Awareness and Sense of Connectedness with Self,
Others, and a Greater Whole

Persons dealing with health challenges may exhibit a fragmented sense of self and
feel dissonant with, or isolated from, meaningful relationships in their lives, including
their perceived relationship with themselves. As these persons engage in the healing
process, they frequently experience expanded awareness and a sense of connectedness
that prompts changes in their relationships. Reconciling and reconnecting with self and
significant others becomes a priority and is both a step in the healing process and a
manifestation that indicates healing has occurred. As people heal, characteristically, they
want to share their experience with people who are meaningful in their lives. They also
exhibit an openness and willingness to create new, meaningful relationships. Subjects
report nurses often facilitate reconciling, reconnecting, and changing relationships that
lead to healing as manifested through expanded awareness and connectivity. According
to subject responses, clients who are critically ill or terminally ill are more likely to
express experiences of spiritual awakenings that manifest an expanded awareness and a
sense of connection with a greater whole. In addition, clients who have made significant
life changes associated with a health episode describe transformational experiences. The
following excerpts are representative of the responses from which this theme was
derived.

Many times they will move from the struggle of dealing with the specific intent to
abstain from substance abuse into experiencing serenity in their recovery process.
[Move from specific intent to abstain from substance abuse to an intentionality to
seek wholeness.] Though each person describes it differently, it seems to be this
all-encompassing peace, which may reflect their transformational stage. (Subject
A)

They come into our…program feeling isolated and alone and they are not feeling
connected to anything outside themselves. They are running their life on a battery,
as opposed to having an alternator helping the battery along. When they see they
can quietly resolve issues in their lives by reflection they feel a great relief.
…[Then] there is an expanded awareness and people are connecting in ways that
they haven’t been connecting before…moving from an isolated, fragmented
position into a connected, more coherently whole position. …I see two levels of

61
 manifestation. One is by taking action for themselves through their expanded
awareness and the other is by sharing in very specific ways with others about this
change within themselves. They tend to bring people in that they feel connected
with and want to make them a part of the healing process that they are
experiencing. (Subject S)

After patients have gone through a series of treatments with nurses using
alternative therapies, I’ve noticed that although they may still have the illness,
they feel like they know themselves more and they are more comfortable with
themselves. [They] feel more a part of the world and the universe. It is a real
sense of being a part of a greater whole for both the nurses and the clients. So
their healing is the connection with themselves and their connection with others
and their expanded connection at a universal level. (Subject W)

As the healing process progresses, expanded awareness and the experience of

connectedness permeates the client’s relationships and life.

Exhibits Observable and Intuitively Understood Human Field Pattern Changes

Subjects’ responses reflected agreement that changes indicative of healing can be

both observed using the senses and can be apprehended through intuitive knowing.
Subjects reported changes associated with healing as a perceived shift in the whole
pattern of the client’s energy field. However, they acknowledge the challenge in “seeing
the whole” without breaking it down into parts when they try to describe and understand
the changes. Subject C’s description reflects this view:

[The challenge] is to see the whole. I think we see it, I’m not sure we can perceive
it all at once so what happens is that I think we notice the pattern has changed and
I think this is a holistic thing. Intuition is big. The things that we know don’t just
come out of the air. There is a perceptual pattern that is enough that we become
aware of it. So appearance of face and eyes, I think is reflective. I think it’s in the
voice and I think that even in the manner of movement. We perceive the whole
and then we try to understand the whole. In that process we sometimes go to
those things that seem to be making up the whole and try to express them. If
you’ve gone into mutual process as a nurse with this client in previous meetings,
then when this person sees you, there is a way in which your proximity and
his/her seeing you generates an eagerness. What happens is not just in them but in
both of you. The pattern changes are reflected in that interaction. It’s like what

62
 they say and how they say it, both. Maybe more than that we don’t understand,
but it’s noticeable.

In seeking to describe changes indicative of healing, subjects emphasized the importance

of differentiating curing from healing. Curing is focused on resolving a specific health
problem. A client may be cured but not healed, especially if the client has been a passive
participant [patient] in the management of his/her health care problem. Conversely, a
client might be healed but not cured, particularly in cases of chronic or terminal illnesses.
The changes that indicate cure involve the elimination or reduction of the problem or its
manifestations. The changes indicative of healing are reflected in the client’s life process
which includes the meaningful integration of health issues. Optimally, healing is the goal
and curing is an objective to be achieved within the healing process (Cowling and
Taliaferro 2004; Gunther and Alligood 2002). Subject D’s description is representative of
the subjects’ responses:

I think the difference between curing and healing is an important one. I think of
curing as a culminating kind of an event and it is a yes or no. I think of healing as
an ongoing process that is endless because it is almost one and the same with the
life process. So what you have are moments of healing, moments of right
relationship, moments when something comes together in a new way that gives
the system more energy or more wholeness in that moment. Then the system is
changed from that point on and goes on.

According to subjects, healing is reflected in observable physical, cognitive, emotional,

and movement changes. These changes may be exhibited through a more relaxed
demeanor, greater eye contact, freer movement, stronger voice, more coherent behavior,
and increased interpersonal engagement. In addition to these observable indicators,
subjects report intuitively recognizing changes in the client’s energy field, such as the
intent and directionality of the field. Again, Subject C describes the pattern of subjects’
responses reflecting this combined reading of observable and intuitively understood
changes indicative of the healing process:
Some observable manifestations of healing, I believe, have to do with emotion
and movement, facial appearance and eyes, affect, the position of the body and
the voice when a person speaks. Not just what is said, but how it is said…the

63
 rhythm of…speech. What we are talking about is the whole collection of
observables that we put some label on. I think nurses do help people articulate
what they are experiencing. When something has been inside and doesn’t have
words, the nurse can help that person find the words to express. What happens
with that expression is there is an emotional release. It’s a structure that helps
them understand or have some meaning.

Healing may be incremental or may appear to happen in a moment. Whatever the process
trajectory, subjects agreed that changes indicative of healing are observable and
intuitively known to the client, nurse, and significant others.

What Conditions and Relationships did subjects Report as Characteristic of Healing

environments?

Subject responses were clear in their messages that relationships are the most
important aspects of a healing environment. As such, relationships serve as barometers
reflecting both indications of problems and indications of healing changes. Relationships
were also identified as the primary context for creating energy frequency shifts resulting
in healing changes. Recurring themes relative to relationships addressed reconciling
relationships with self and others, client-nurse mutually connecting, and collective impact
of relational experiences. Conditions subjects identified as characteristic of healing
environments include themes related to physical design, organizational culture, and
philosophical influences. Since relationships were identified by subjects as by far the
dominant environmental influence, this investigator chose to report these three recurring
themes first.

Right Relationship with Self and Meaningful Others

According to the subjects, clients’ illnesses are frequently developed from or are
complicated by internal discord and fractured relationships with others. A recurring
message within the subjects’ responses was that reconciling one’s relationship with self

64
and significant others was an essential step in the healing process and was also a sign that
the healing process had begun. Discordant relationships with self and others diminish the
energy field. Reconciling relationships with self and others increases energy to the field
and opens the possibilities for change. The following two responses illustrate the
subjects’ perceptions regarding the impact of relationships on the energy field.

When people don’t feel that they have options or that there are possibilities, their
perception of their field diminishes. …[In these situations, people are relating to]
the perception of the closeness or the openness of the field. So I think that
people’s perceptions of themselves are a pattern manifestation of their
relationship with their energy field.” [relationship with self].. (Subject D)

When there is this notion of right relationship, when some element of the system
comes into new pattern and the pattern is a healing pattern, then one of the things
that goes along with that is there is more energy for the whole system. Whatever
level that right relationship emerged in, more energy is available for the whole to
do the work of that system…the way I think about healing is this emergence of
right relationship at one or more levels of the person. [There] is an increase in
order [and] an increase in energy. (Subject D)

Some illnesses, such as substance abuse, are enmeshed in relationship influences.

Subject A provides insight regarding how relationships can be a painful aspect of the
illness and how relationships can serve as the primary vehicle for healing.
…substance abusers frequently have broken relationships or have developed very
tense relationships with their families and their friends. There may have been
threats on the part of family members. There may have been [marriage
dissolutions]. They may have lost significant others and they may have lost their
jobs and homes. They may have been threatened, cajoled, or taken to court by key
people in their lives. Once these people have gotten into a program and become
well established, it is the relationships with the people in the program that help
change their flow of energy and create the possibility for them to heal. The energy
begins to calm down; it begins to flow more smoothly…[and appears less
chaotic]. The relationship with self is the most important impetus for change and
relationships [with others ] are the bedrock of healing. (Subject A)

Subjects’ reported the importance of recognizing when relationships were creating a

barrier to healing. In these instances, changing the nature of the adverse relationship is
necessary for the client to reorient her/his energy field pattern and make healing possible.

65
These negative relationship patterns may have developed over years, may involve very
significant persons in the client’s life and may be challenging to negotiate. Subject W
provides a representative example of this type of situation.

A woman with scleroderma was incredibly ill and dying. She realized that her
relationships with her family were not working. That she was really a servant to
them and to her kids and had been just overly self-sacrificing. That she needed to
change that in order to heal. She did. She told her kids that she wasn’t going to
see them every weekend and she began to set limits with her adult children. She
then related to me and this made a big impact on her process of healing.
Reconciling her relationships with herself and with her children made it possible
for her to begin the healing process. (Subject W)

In sum, “right relationship” was identified by subjects as key in creating a healing

environment. The client’s perception of self is a reflection of his/her energy field pattern.
When there is discord with one’s perception of self, there is discord in the energy field
pattern. Repatterning the field requires a shift to right relationship with self. This
repatterning relationship with self often occurs within the context of open and accepting
relationships with others.

Intentional Mutual Process

This was the most frequently recurring of all themes identified from subject
responses relative to relationships. The subjects’ responses reflected Rogers’ principle of
integrality and the SUHB practice method of voluntary mutual patterning. Intentional
Mutual Process, as used by the subjects, referred to the client-nurse connecting in a
meaningful way. The subjects described how through this connection, a mutual intent to
repattern the energy field formed. According to the subjects, this mutuality of intent
creates synchronicity in the client-nurse energy field waves that increase wave frequency
and potentiates change. Subject M provided a typical response delineating this process.

Mutual process magnifies the possibilities of what can happen when

intentionalities are united and that is a lot of what happens in any kind of
therapeutic relationship. We talk about relationships heal no matter what kind of

66
 therapy or healing in any kind of paradigm or any kind of theoretical perspective.
It’s always the mutual process that is so important in what happens and in change.
There is a special type of synchrony that is happening in health patterning and the
healing process work. The mutual process, when people are willingly committed
to it, brings about healing. If someone is freely and you are freely committed to a
certain intention there is a lot of healing energy attached to that.” (Subject M)

Subjects report the rhythmicity of mutual process contributes to creating higher

frequency wave patterns that facilitate energy field change. Subject C provides a graphic
description of the mutual process rhythm within a relationship.

Some of the dissonance in the patient’s energy field gets dealt with because the
patient is sharing things with the nurse and the nurse is interacting with the person
in such a way that their process becomes more mutual. By that I mean they
understand and know more about each other. Then I think what happens is that
they are able to sort of move together. At that point, when it’s mutual, the nurse is
moving with the patient and the patient is moving with the nurse. I think of it like
jumping rope. Remember when you were ready to go in and jump…you would
stand there and sense and use your hands and often you would sense the rhythm
of that rope. You go in and start jumping. When you are really and truly in that
process with the patient, it’s like you are actually going to jump right with the
rhythm of the rope. When we really have these relationships that are mutual and
we are moving that patient along, what I think happens is that we are in their
rhythm and we sense their rhythm. (Subject C)

Subjects pointed out that mutual process cannot occur in situations where the nurse is
trying to control the outcome. This is a particular challenge for nurses practicing in
highly conventional settings where prediction and control are dominant values. However,
the subjects iterated that efforts to control undermine mutual process. In particular, they
warned against the nurse taking the position that he/she knows what is best for the client,
and therefore assumes a controlling role. The following excerpts are representative of the
responses relative to the risks of trying to control the relationship.

So if my ego is tied to the outcome or to my solution, then I really am not

participating fully in this mutual process between us. We partner in creating a
relationship and my job is to bring resources into the relationship that can be
useful to the person and to open up possibilities for [him/her] and
expand…consciousness to those possibilities…my job is to create an environment

67
 and provide the resources for the person to realize or create [his/her] own
solutions. You have to let go of controlling the situation. (Subject E)

If a nurse sits there in her position of judging and knowing and thinking she
knows the client and thinks the client needs to do what she thinks the client needs
to do, that can kill the healing process. It’s that very thinking that prevents us
from having authentic relationships. (Subject D)

Subject S further emphasized the importance of the nurse consciously demonstrating that
she/he values the client as an equal partner in the healing process. If the communication
is such that the only “valued” information comes from the nurse, this inequity is apt to
create the experience of the nurse being perceived as the more valued person in the
relationship, undermining the sense of partnership. This excerpt clarifies that perspective.

The relationship is important in terms of really truly valuing patients and making
an attempt to understand them and then trying to be helpful from their
perspective. All of this happens within a healing environment. ….Bonding
requires that people like each other. Nurses have to be willing to learn from the
patients because it is the ‘taking something new’ in from the patients that open up
the channel for patients to take something in from us as nurses. ….It’s important
that we pay attention to what we can learn from our patients. Clients are
impressed that I’m writing down what they have taught me and they are more
open to what I’m saying. I sometimes learn simple things like how to store
potatoes so they don’t rot. When patients see we value what they have to offer us,
they open up to us in a new way. We also create a different kind of balance in the
relationship with this type of exchange. These relationships are mutual and
mutually healing. (Subject S)

Based on the findings, intentional mutual process between the client and the nurse forms
the basis for repatterning the energy field and making the changes necessary for healing
to occur. The key focus is on creating a mutual relationship; one within which the client
and nurse can facilitate change through mutual purpose and energetic synchrony.

Energetic Influences from Collective Relational Experiences

This theme reflects subjects’ responses indicating the importance of “being

mindful” that each partner in a client-nurse relationship carries the energetic influences of

68
all other relationships in her/his life into this specific healing relationship. Dissonance in
the nurse’s relationships (e.g. co-workers) has the potential to affect the nurse’s openness
and ability to connect therapeutically with the client. Dissonance among those around the
client diminishes the energy available for healing. The therapeutic milieu is a powerful
energetic influence; Subject E’s response is a good example of the subjects’ points of
view:
There is the immediate relationship that is going on [with the client]…and then
there is the field that is beyond us but still encompassing us directly. Then there is
another field beyond that, which is including the people that are in [each of] our
lives. So even though we are in an immediate expression of one energetic
relationship, we’re influenced by all those other energetic relationships. In
creating a healing environment, I must be conscious of…influencing energetic
patterns. …Relationship Centered Care and the context of that have an effect on
the immediate relationship. If you are in a clinical environment where the
relationship among the team and the healers [physicians, nurses, etc.] is a
therapeutic one, then it has a positive impact on your relationship with your
patient. It is difficult to create a healing relationship with a patient when there is
dissonance in those kinds of environments…it offers much bigger challenges
because there is a drain in the field. (Subject E)

The client’s relational status with significant persons in his/her life has an impact on the
healing process. The subjects emphasized that one cannot expect healing to occur without
making needed changes in the most meaningful relationships. The nurse may facilitate
the client’s reflections on his/her relationships and may help arrange for reconciliation or
reconnecting to occur. Subject M’s response illustrates of this perspective.

Relationships with everyone in one’s life play an important part in the healing
process. It’s really important to help people with their relationships with others.
Healing does not take place in a vacuum; the whole environment needs to be a
healing environment. If they are having marital issues, or issues with their
children, or [issues within] any important relationships, if there are kinks in them;
it really helps if the clients can smooth these out - which isn’t easy for any of us.
So when you are trying to create a healing environment…you have to at least try
to [facilitate their reconciling] the most important relationships in that person’s
life. (Subject M)

As indicated earlier in this section, the subjects’ responses emphasized that the most
important aspect of the healing environment was meaningful relationships. In fact, the

69
subjects indicated that all other conditions in the environment were secondary to the
healing relationship.

Client-Centered Design

The subjects’ responses reflected an appreciation for the contributions aesthetics

and attractive physical design can make to create a healing environment. However, they
described these contributions as enhancements to the healing process as compared to the
essential role meaningful relationships play in the healing process. Repeatedly, the
subjects acknowledged that color, music, and flowers could facilitate a healing
experience; but quickly pointed out that, even in the harshest conditions, people create
healing experiences through the power of meaningful relationships. The following
excerpts share these perspectives:

The most important part of the patient’s environment is his/her relationship with
the practice nurse. Whether the walls are painted pink or chartreuse or black, in
the moments when the patient is suffering, the artistry of the human connection is
indeed the most profoundly important one. So I think the design of the physical
environment can be important, but [it] is not paramount. When…offered without
offering a healing relationship, they simply become trivial. When they are used
with other support, they become much more powerful. Certainly all of us feel
better in beautiful surroundings. (Subject D)

I think that a physical environment can contribute to healing. I think that physical
conditions can be patterned in such a way to promote healing potential. I think
that healing does and can occur regardless of the physical environment. I think if
there is a relationship, in which one is supporting another who is seeking to heal,
that the physical environment is like a myth. It does not matter. I keep thinking
about Katrina and the people who survived and thrived through that process and
the incredible moments of healing that occurred in that environment. The healing
actually occurred through relationships. The dominant condition is the healing
relationship (Subject E)

Subjects’ responses reflected that they perceived individualizing the environment to the
client to be a higher priority than providing any particular design features. The focus
described was threefold: order, individualization, and stimulating changes. Repeatedly,

70
the subjects pointed out that the time honored nursing practice of maintaining an orderly
environment has an impact on the way the energy resonates in the field. Structuring the
room for the client’s preferences creates a sense of ‘being settled” and a comfortable
environmental pattern. Periodically introducing something new into the environment, like
a family picture, flowers, or music can be a welcome change that stimulates positive
energy flow. Subject C’s response relative to the import of individualizing the setting is
typical:

If we are talking about a patient in the hospital, we’re talking about somebody
who we’ve extracted from [his/her environmental] pattern and plunked them
down into a different pattern. They are trying to deal with that, so the way they
deal with it is to try to form a pattern in the hospital. This frequently comes across
as ‘I like my bed table right over there’. That’s trying to pattern their own
environment and I encourage people not to get irritated with clients who do that.
Something does happen after two or three days. Even if you travel and stay in a
motel or hotel or something, the first day is very different than the second and
third days in terms of how you feel when you come in. I think that’s about
becoming patterned to that environment. (Subject C)

Subjects’ identified a number of conditions in the physical setting that impede the healing
process: noise, bright lights, and constant interruptions. These stressors and any other
factors in the environment that make the client feel uncomfortable should be removed.
Another factor identified as requiring consideration was the potential for the client to
become isolated, especially if he/she is in a private room and rarely calls for assistance.
As indicated repeatedly in subject responses, “…human interaction is critical to healing”.
(Subject C).

Healthy Nursing Culture Facilitates a Healing Environment

A thread woven throughout all the interviews was the message that the health of
the nursing culture within an organization directly affects the capacity to create a healing
environment. Several of the subjects explicitly identified a healthy nursing culture as an
antecedent to creating a healing environment. Their responses reflected the position that a

71
healing/healthy environment for the nurse made it possible to have a healing environment
for the client. Subject V raises the issue of how nurses are viewed within the institution:
I think a huge factor that supports nurses in actively participating with patient
healing is whether that institution values nursing as nursing. There are all sorts of
ways that you can look at nursing. (Subject V)

The issue of “valuing nursing” requires that nursing’s role be understood in order to be
valued and supported. Several subjects discussed the competing views about nursing’s
role, particularly in hospital settings. The following synthesizes the perspectives voiced
by the subjects. Since hospitals continue to be the largest employers of nurses, these
institutions have an industry-wide impact on how nurses’ roles are viewed and how
employment conditions are managed. In many hospital settings, nurses have limited
autonomy and nursing care is structured as a series of tasks. Nurses also are assigned
non-clinical functions related to meeting a variety of hospital objectives. In addition to
these “making the train run on time” assignments, nurses serve as the key interface
between clients and their physicians and other providers. Subjects point out that many of
these providers view the nurse’s sole role as making sure their plans for the client are
implemented. The unintended consequences of these organizational conditions are role
confusion and fragmentation. Under these conditions, the subjects assert that nurses are
diverted from their professional priority of “placing the client in the best position to
heal”. Subject D suggested that the current organizational conditions have contributed to
the nursing shortage and that an ecological approach is needed to establish a healing,
supportive nursing culture:

Alleviating the nursing shortage involves caring and healing within the health
care system. It’s important to create an environment for nursing. I call this
‘habitats for healing’. We really need to think about nurses not as commodities
that can be bought and sold, but as an endangered species. If you use an
ecological model even the questions you ask are different. When you are dealing
with an endangered species, you don’t try to get more [of the species] into a toxic
environment, you clean up the environment first. You make sure that you create a
place where when you bring the endangered species, they can survive.…What
will be good for healing is what will be good for nurses because the nurses in the

72
 institution are; in fact, [what] is needed for healing. You have to create
environments where nurses can nurse. (Subject D)

Philosophically Grounded, Open, and in Search of Meaning

Subjects identified philosophical and ideological influences as being significant

factors in facilitating healing. Three sources of influence were described: the clients’
beliefs and views about themselves, the nurses’ awareness of his/her ideological
perspectives and the nursing framework being used. The subjects’ responses reflected the
perception that no matter what clients’ formal belief system, clients’ acceptance of their
humanity- the vulnerabilities and possibilities-and their openness to change were major
influences on healing potential. Subject M provides a representative perspective:

Acceptance is a great gift that people have. You know when people have that
awareness that they are human and what that means. What it means to be human.
When people embrace that in its fullest, I think they are able to bring about
changes, healing and otherwise. Recognizing our own humanity is a perspective
that [is] empowering in terms of making changes. Power is from within. …I think
one thing that is very important is people who have openness to various ideas. An
acceptance of different points of view as legitimate beyond their own…people
who believe that they don’t have to be perfect...don’t have to defend, necessarily,
because they recognize that we are all imperfect – we all make mistakes.(Subject
M)

Subjects’ responses indicated that they thought the nurse’s level of awareness regarding
his/her own ideological perspectives was important. A nurse with a low level of
awareness is at risk of allowing his/her beliefs to impinge on the nurse-client relationship
and client freedom in making health choices. Subject D provides a response relative to
this concern:

Part of my ideology is to recognize that you don’t know what is happening and
your job is to just simply support whatever is happening – not to manage it. …I
think we are profoundly influenced by our ideology and what we think is going
on. We all have an ideology. We simply don’t take the time very often to question
what it is. So it’s often the hidden director, the behind-the-scenes director,

73
 directing the show. One of our responsibilities then; if we really want to facilitate
healing, is to take the unconscious, the hidden directors, and get them out front
and center so that we really recognize what our philosophy is – what we believe
and also what its limitations are. One question is: When are our ideologies getting
between ourselves and our patients? (Subject D)

The subjects’ responses indicated that they considered practicing within a defined nursing
framework to be of significant value. Several of the subjects commented on the extent to
which their worldview as well as their practice had been influenced by Rogers’ SUHB.
This philosophical grounding appeared to provide a structure for the subjects that
facilitate a high level of focus and consistency in their practice no matter what the setting
or circumstance. Subjects pointed out that the concurrence of these ideological influences
fostered an environment in which the client could find meaning in his/her experience,
finding meaning promotes healing. Subject W’s response shows this perspective:

Healing is finding meaning in your experience. I think any philosophical or

religious or spiritual background – anything that helps a person make meaning of
an experience is essential. People who have had patients who have been through
horrible trauma, if they can figure a way to say, ‘I’ve learned from this – I’ve had
to change certain things in my life because of this’ – then healing is possible.

What Nursing Practices and Processes did Subjects Report as Facilitative of Client
Healing?

The four practice themes subjects identified as facilitative of healing are grounded
in the nursing framework and practices developed from Rogers’ SUHB: a theory-based
practice, nurse as environment, appraisal and mutual patterning, and the nursing art of
designing care. As subjects described these practices, they reported that there was a
natural flow that seamlessly moved from one process into another, that re-engaged
processes in the move forward. Appraisal flowed into mutual patterning while integrating
the design of care, appraisal, and re-patterning would re-emerge when a new level of
movement called for it. It was clear from their observations that these subjects had
acquired an expertise and comfort in applying these practices in their professional roles.

74
The challenge for this investigator has been reporting this information coherently without
too much fragmentation, since the subjects clearly described a seamlessness that is
essentially nonlinear, in contrast to the need to organize and report these data. These
themes are reported in four sections with a request that the reader view them as merging
waves on the same tide.

Theory-Based Practice

Using a theory as the basis for practice was reported by the subjects as an
indicator of professional level nursing. In their view, a conceptual framework is
necessary to define the nurse-client relationship, structure the processes used in creating a
healing environment, appropriately use expert knowledge, and provide professional
nursing services. This process all flows from the theoretical framework. Subject C’s
response describes theory-based practice:
What I would like to talk about is what I would call professional practice. I think
professional practice hopefully has to do with our education. What it is is
rendering a service that is focused on the patient. To me if we are focused on
ourselves and what it is we’re doing, then we really have not reached the level of
professional practice. The reason I love the nursing frameworks is that they make
us focus on the patient. Through the lens of the framework, you can get a view of
the person and it organizes what you are seeing and gives you a way to
understand that and to provide the service. You might be able to say to somebody,
‘This is who I am. This is what I do and this is how I do it.’ To me that is a
professional person. Martha [Rogers] was pushing for a framework for research
but she was also pushing for a framework for practice…a framework that focused
on the person and his or her environment. That is what Rogers meant by
professional practice. (Subject C)

The value subjects placed on nursing theory in general and their chosen
theoretical framework specifically reflected the way they described their practice. These
subjects’ responses reflected Rogers’ view of the unique role of the nursing profession
and that perspective was consistently linked to their theoretical grounding. In the
response that follows, one can identify the concepts from nursing’s meta-paradigm and
how the subjects used Rogerian theory to apply these concepts:

75
 But what makes it nursing in my view, is that I have a knowledge base about
unitary human beings that is always in the context of their environment and I look
at them as energy fields. There can be a single energy field in the context of their
environment or [there] can be different kinds of groups with their energy
field…their family of origin and their family now or their work groups. Whatever
that environment is like and what is now manifesting in all of these different
environments. Then my job is to try to know pattern manifestations by looking at
their experiences, their perceptions, and all of this so that we can come to the next
phase of the process, which is voluntary mutual patterning that we are doing
together. But the basic thing of nursing to me is this knowledge base of
understanding human beings in the context of their environment. (Subject X)

Subjects’ responses indicated that this group of expert nurses perceived practicing within
an organized nursing framework to be essential to professional level practice.

Nurse as Environment

Within the SUHB, the environmental energy field is integral with the client’s
energy field. Changes in the client’s energy field are brought about through mutual
simultaneous processes inherent in both the client’s human and environmental fields. As
described earlier in this document, subjects’ responses indicated their conviction that in a
health care setting, they consider the nurse to be the key environmental influence. Their
view is that the nurse in mutual process with the client presents the best opportunity to
facilitate healing changes. This theme, represented by the designation “nurse as
environment”, reflects the strong emphasis subjects placed on the nurses’ role in the
client’s environment. Subject E’s response is representative of the subjects’ responses:

Most of the time, we think of the environment as being a physical construct

around us, and my perspective is that I am the person’s environment. That human
environment relationship is the thing that we are working with and I can influence
myself as part of that relationship and when I make changes in myself, the
relationship changes. And then the person is somehow, through some universal
flow, able to change themselves. (Subject E)

Subjects describe themselves partnering with their clients to navigate a healing path.
They saw the nurse’s role as creating safety and trust within the environment. It is their

76
view that when the client feels safe, he/she is able to respond to health challenges and
participate in change to bring about healing. The nurse responds to the client’s pattern
and circumstances to determine how to establish a trusting relationship. The client learns
that he/she can rely on the nurse as a resource for information, support, and professional
expertise. Subject V provides a response that illustrates how a nurse may serve as source
of safety in a frightening situation:
It’s more of a special relationship in the world that matters, I think. If I determine
that the patient may be getting in a panic situation, you can bring them back from
that spiral by exerting more control. I need to become their world and the only
thing they are aware of at the time is just me. Using the force of my energy with
them, I think I can pull them back. So, it is the power of the connection with you
that perhaps get them through? They can trust. They can know that I’m not
leaving them. That I’m observing them. That I’m breathing with them. That I’m
not going to let them get into trouble. (Subject V)

In addition to the individual nurse-client encounter, Subject V points out that it’s
important for the client to have a sense of what he/she can expect from nurses in general;
this helps create a sense of trust and safety with the environment as a whole:

It is interesting that, even in a short encounter, I can have an existential moment

with a client. When I was working in a pre-surgical assessment setting, we were
trying to convey to our clients that this is the beginning of our relationship with
you. This is how we are with you here. We are available to you and we want to
know your story, and we want to know what brought you here. What your stresses
and worries are because we are going to be here for you and here is what is going
to be happening to you next. That had a sense of trajectory to it as well, even
though I probably wouldn’t be seeing them again. I was helping establish
[nursing] relationships in the future.” (Subject V)

Subjects’ responses were clear and consistent: the nurse is the primary
environmental influence. The nurse partners with the client and serves as a guide on the
path to healing. The nurse is a source of expert knowledge and skills who will take action
for the client or coach the client depending on the situation. Once the nurse and client
have established a relationship, the nurse serves as the client’s advocate, interpreter, and
partner in fostering healing.

77
Appraisal and Mutual Patterning

Within SUHB framework, knowing the client involves appraising the client’s life
pattern and identifying energy field manifestations relevant to health concerns. The focus
is on reading the client’s whole pattern and determining what is unique. Knowing the life
pattern provides the nurse with a context for helping the client to identify mutually
pattern emergent changes associated with healing. Subject B’s response illustrates why
it’s important to know the client as a whole person when trying to interpret his/her
specific actions and needs in a clinical situation:

There was a woman in her 70s and the nurses were concerned about her because
she was doing everything the opposite of what [they thought] should be done. Her
body mechanics were so bad, and she was frail. They were concerned that she
might fall. I put the bed rail down and pulled up a chair right next to the bed and I
took her hand and I said, ‘I’m going to be your nurse for the night and my name is
Subject B, and I will help you.’ I sat there for a moment and looked at the tattoo
number on her arm and immediately I knew what was wrong. I touched the tattoo
and I ran my fingers over it and I said, ‘Is this what’s bothering you?’ She started
to cry and said, ‘Yes, yes, yes. I feel like I’m again in Auschwitz – the halls, the
wires and the prison’. Still you could feel that relative past was right there with
her--vulnerable, bars on the rails that were up, frightened, nobody there. I said,
‘I’m gong to leave the rails down, but I’m going to show you how you can get up
and get down, so you are safe here. She said, ‘I can’t sleep at night – would you
just sit in that chair? Don’t do anything but just sit in that chair until I fall asleep’.

In order for the nurse to facilitate healing, she/he has to know the client’s life
pattern as well as the relevant clinical information. This level of knowing is greater than
having bits of data about the client’s physiological status. Subject V’s response illustrates
this:

Knowing the patient is critical, nurses have to know what the problems are and
know what to watch for and also how to create safety. I think trust and safety are
essential. It’s not about machinery--it’s about being known. What are the likely
things that can go wrong here? Who is their family? Where do they come from?
Where are they going to go next? Stuff like that makes a difference because it’s
all about trajectory and directionality. It is essential that the patient be known. We
must have access to understanding the wholeness of the person. In today’s

78
 hospital settings, frequently nobody knows these patients. No one even knows
what the patient looks like. The patient needs to be known. We need to know who
they are. We know the physiological data but we also [need] to know if he looks
down today as compared to yesterday. If a nurse is truly paying attention to who
that person is as a whole person, that little piece of data planted in the mind of the
oncoming nurse will alert her to watch that patient a little differently.

The move from appraisal to mutual patterning is a seamless process. When a need
for change is recognized, the client and nurse begin the process of mutual patterning.
They identify choices and support the client in making and implementing those choices.
This approach to addressing a health concern differs significantly from the methods used
by providers and nurses who see their role as controlling the situation on behalf of the
client. For example, a newly diagnosed diabetic being managed through a “prescribe and
control” approach would be provided information and told what to do in highly definitive
terms. Using a mutual patterning approach, the client and nurse would partner in
examining the choices the newly diagnosed diabetic must consider and the nurse would
support the client in making choices within the context of the client’s life pattern. Subject
M’s response is representative of this process:

Ok, I’m aware of this. I see the X, Y, Z manifesting and I have to look now and
see what kind of choices need to be made that I would choose to make as the
client and helping the client doing it together. I have to see what is getting in the
way because that is where the freedom comes in. That is the major blockage,
usually. How am I involving myself right at the moment in creating changes?
Well, maybe I am not involving myself in a way that is getting me anywhere at all
and I might be making things worse. So I try to look at all four dimensions of
power: awareness, choices, freedom to act intentionally, and involvement in
creating change. When you do that then you really have a good assessment of
knowing the power that is operating there and what needs to be done to change it.
Sometimes it just helps to point out very directly and very specifically things for
the client, and then it’s up to the client to choose.

Subjects reflected that appraisal and mutual patterning are highly integrated into
nursing practice and can be seen in nurse-client interactions in a variety of settings and
circumstances. Their comments indicated that though nurses may only have brief or
circumscribed opportunities to engage a client; expert nurses can use these opportunities

79
effectively. Subject B provides an example of an appraisal and mutual patterning that
occurred by e-mail engagement. Though this is a lengthy excerpt, it provides important
insight into the appraisal and mutual patterning process and its applicability even in
unusual circumstances.
Marvin was a very challenging client who had a congenital disfigurement. At age
50, he learned of a surgical procedure that could significantly improve his
appearance and physical discomfort. This surgery is available only at a few health
care facilities and ours is one of them. One of the challenges was preparing
Marvin for this procedure at a distance since he lived Australia. Marvin was
anxious to have the surgery. A treatment plan had to be developed in
collaboration with other physicians. He became very angry and frustrated with the
time frame necessary to initiate treatment. I sensed that his initial perception of
me was “a cog in a wheel that was not making progress”.

In an early e-mail, when a treatment plan had not yet been established, he told me
that “I was ruining his life.” Marvin’s communications with the providers, via e-
mail and telephone, became more and more antagonistic. When I began
communicating with him several months after his initial contact with our service,
I appraised Marvin’s communications as expressing anger and a sense of
powerlessness about his inability to access the surgery quickly and about his life
in general. The following E-mail exchange demonstrates how Marvin and I were
able to connect and mutually pattern change.

To Subject B; From Marvin

I am very frustrated with having to do additional tests. I have waited long enough.
I’ve wasted enough time. I lost too many years already-my childhood,
adolescence, opportunities for romance, and a career. Did you know I have never
had a relationship with a woman? I am too ashamed to even talk to one. I do not
have much of life left. Why is this taking so long?

To Marvin; From Subject B

Please be patient, we want to do things right rather than fast. You have a complex
case and the planning stage is most important. You will be getting a letter soon
with recommendations. In the meantime, I want you to realize you are the one
with the power to choose and act on your decisions. Now would be a good time
for you to reflect on the concept of power as knowing participation in change.
There are four dimensions to consider: awareness, choice, freedom to act
intentionally, and involvement in creating change. It’s important for you to realize
you have the power to make changes in your life. You are aware of all aspects of
your situation and soon you will have choices to make based on the
recommendations from our team. The team will not make the choices for you, but
will support you in freely acting on those choices. Marvin, you do have the power

80
to create change in your life, and you will have our support. Please let go of the
anger, and claim the power available to you.

To Subject B; From Marvin

Beautiful Subject B, I just wanted to let you know that I am ok and to thank you
for being so kind to me. I am a bit confused at the moment and a bit worn out
from this journey of searching for help. My head and my heart say that I need to
change. My bitterness, rudeness, and anger are wrong and damaging to everyone
including myself. I do not like it. Need to let go. Need to change; otherwise I will
never be happy.

To Marvin; From Subject B

You have done some serious self-examination that must have been painful but
productive. Don't "beat yourself up". You have learned much from this experience
and have come a long way by recognizing how your behavior affects you and
others around you. That is a major step! Change is continuous but not necessarily
in big steps. Take one item at a time that you think you need to deal with and
work on making changes. Concentrate on how you will accomplish your goal but
don't get overwhelmed. Progress may be slow, but it is still progress.

Your self-image is also important. I have seen so many people with congenital
disfigurements who do not perceive themselves as able to have a loving
relationship. I have learned so much from them. They enjoy all the gifts of life. I
remember one man who was very disfigured. He made his living by selling items
at a large flea market on a weekly basis. His beautiful wife accompanied him
because he had such a successful business. He freely spoke to his customers about
his self-perception. He did not feel uncomfortable when people looked at him. He
knew who he was as a person and what he had to offer the world and those around
him. Listening to him was very moving. You could not go away without deep
respect and admiration for him and his attitude.

I am proud of your breakthrough in being able to see your health issue and your
behavior in a different light. This is the first step in making change. Examine
your resonating pattern of behavior. Do some journal writing on how you feel and
what you can do to feel better about yourself.

I look forward to our continuing dialogue.

To Subject B; From Marvin

Thank you for the e-mail which is so encouraging.

Everything seems to be calming down, my heart, mind, and body

I am leaving in a few hours to visit loved ones so I am excited. I will e-mail you
when I return.

81
 It is evident from this exchange that Subject B, whose physical presence was at a
distance, was still able to effectively connect with Marvin. Subject B did not react to
Marvin’s anger but facilitated his self-examination and provided him guidance relative to
his opportunities to create change. Although Subject B and Marvin never physically met,
they developed an appreciation for one another. Marvin’s salutation, “Beautiful Subject
B” was a manifestation of his perception of “inner beauty and sincerity”. Subject B
acknowledged Marvin’s pattern manifestations of self-reflection and inner strength that
were associated with his efforts to promote change.
This is an excellent example of pattern appraisal and mutually patterning change
between two people who met and connected electronically.

Nursing Art of Designing Care

Subjects emphasized the importance of nursing care being designed specifically in

response to the individual client. The following is a synthesis of observations made by
several subjects relative to the move toward structured standardization of nursing
practices. In busy health care settings, it is common to have formula nursing care plans
and educational materials that are structured around the routine medical management of
the client’s specific diagnosis. In some instances, these structured care plans and other
tools are printed and available on the nursing units. In settings with electronic medical
records, these structured materials are programmed into the electronic database.
Subjects pointed out that this “programmed” approach to managing the client’s
“problem” may be considered expedient for addressing health problems but it decreases
the probability that the client will receive individualized care designed to engage him/her
effectively in the healing process. Subject C described how nurses use their art in
designing care that is responsive to the client’s life pattern, current health challenge and
the choices he/she have to make. Subjects emphasized the need for nurses to be versatile
and artful in applying various nursing modalities. Subject D’ response is representative:

82
 It’s using the whole toolbox of nursing practices and discerning which of those
tools to use at the moment out of deep presence with this patient. It’s really using
your whole self and your awareness of the whole self to discern what is the right
action for the patient at the moment. Nursing practice is selected based on what is
happening with the patient or what the patient is experiencing at that moment and
the nurse takes the cues from that. Again the nurses are responding to where the
patient is. So I would say that another nursing practice that is important is nursing
intuition.

Subjects also indicated that the artful nurse is sensitive and responsive to healing
opportunities. Subject S describes how a nurse can transform a crisis into a healing
moment:

From an individual standpoint the nurse bonds with clients, identifies a focal
concern, gives her care gently, helps them try to improve their well-being,
expands their awareness, and teaches them to process. You have to be able to
sense what needs to be done clinically and intuitively and take the appropriate
actions, which vary and are individualized and personalized to situations and
people. You have to be able to take whatever action is necessary to intervene in a
healing crisis. If you handle the crisis right it can become a healing moment. You
have to be able to think on your feet with a pocket full of tricks that you learn
over time to be able to intervene in a way that will transfer the crisis into a healing
moment rather than to escalate it into a nightmare. Doing this is a lot like
improvisation.

From the subjects’ point of view, the artful designing of patient care is
characteristic of professional level practice. The implementation of problem-oriented
tasks is characteristic of technical level care. Subject C’s response reflects the perspective
that differentiated practice should focus on the professional role of designing care:

I think that part of providing healing environment has to do with recognizing this
person and where they are in this whole process of whatever is going on with
them, and who they are, and then designing care specifically for them. The
healing environment is created by the art of nursing. …I think the nurse needs to
be the professional person who designs care. I think that we haven’t talked
enough about designing care. We haven’t really talked about designing the care
and the importance of who designs it and then who does what part of it.”

83
 During the interview, Subject C shared with this investigator her own experience
of having been diagnosed with cancer. Subject C described a poignant conversation
between herself and a nurse friend shortly after she began her treatment. Her friend said
to Subject C, “Do you have a nurse taking care of you?” After reflecting, Subject C
replied, “No, I have a number of nurses helping the doctors manage my disease, but no
one is taking care of me.” Her friend said, “I would like to be your nurse”…and then the
healing began.

Summary

In summary, fourteen themes were identified from subject responses to research

questions regarding healing manifestations, conditions and relationships characteristic of
healing environments, and nursing practices and processes facilitative of healing. These
themes reflect the thinking and the practice of nine expert nurses who use SUHB as their
conceptual framework. These thematic findings demonstrated obvious correlations
between subject responses and key concepts from SUHB framework. The practice
patterns reflected by the subjects’ responses also demonstrated similarities and
perspectual consistencies.

Main Research Question of the Study:

What are the Characteristics of a Healing Environment as Described by Expert Nurses
Who Practice within the Conceptual Framework of Rogers Science of Unitary Human
Beings

This investigator integrated the thematic findings from the subject interview
responses with conceptions inferred from the interviews as a whole to formulate an
interpretive narrative description of seven characteristics of a healing environment.

84
Table 3: Characteristics of a Healing Environment

Characteristic 1: In a healing environment, the client defines the focus and

the nature of his/her healing experience.

Characteristic 2: In a healing environment, relational experiences are

recognized and treated as the central energetic influence in
creating such an environment.

Characteristic 3: In a healing environment, nurses and their unique

professional role are understood, valued, and supported as
a dimension of the health care organization’s culture.

Characteristic 4: In a healing environment, the nurse is recognized within

the health care setting as the professional with the potential
for the greatest impact in creating this environment.

Characteristic 5: In a healing environment, nursing practice is theory-based

with a professional focus on designing client-centered care
that facilitates healing.

Characteristic 6: In a healing environment, the organizational culture

supports balancing individualization of healing experiences
with standardization of best curative practices.

Characteristic 7: In a healing environment a healing philosophy is embedded

in the professional culture and organizational core values.

Characteristic 1: In a healing environment, the client defines the focus and the
nature of his/her healing experience.

The client is at the center of the portrait of the healing environment painted by the
subjects of this study. A healing environment is one that is specifically responsive to the
client’s life pattern, perceived healing needs, and choices made by the client. In sharp
contrast to the passive patient role often found in hospital and ambulatory settings, the
client’s role in a healing environment is characteristically an active, knowing, and fully

85
participating partnership in determining the changes necessary to heal and making those
changes.

Characteristic 2: In a healing environment, relational experiences are recognized

and treated as the central energetic influence in creating such an environment.

Meaningful relationships were identified by all subjects as the essential factor in

facilitating healing. Relationships have the potential to increase or diminish the client’s
energy field; this impacts capacity to change patterns and heal.
Characteristically, persons collaborating to create a healing environment are
mindful of the energetic influences emergent from collective relational experiences. In
healing environments, nurses and other professionals recognize the importance of
maintaining healthy relationships among themselves so that their relationships with
clients will not be impaired by conflict or distractions. Study subjects identified
Relationship-Centered Care, a model developed by the Pew-Fetzer Commission, as an
example of initiatives consistent with creating relational conditions necessary for a
healing environment.
Subjects further observed that separation, isolation, and relational dissonance
impede healing, noting that a major factor in facilitating the healing process was the
client’s intentional actions to reconcile , reconnect and change relationship with both self
and meaningful others in his/her life pattern. Subjects used the term ”right relationship”
to describe the process of bringing discordant relationships within oneself and with others
into healing alignment.

86
Characteristic 3: In a healing environment, nurses and their unique professional
role are understood, valued, and supported as a dimension of the health care
organization’s culture.

In organizations committed to creating a healing environment, nursing’s unique

role is understood to be the facilitation of client healing. The following indicators of the
value of nurses and their roles were inferred from study findings:
1) Autonomy in making and implementing nursing practice decisions
2) Support for individualizing client care
3) Time and resources to support healing practices
4) Recognition of essential relationship between nurse self-healing and client
healing
5) Differentiation between technical and professional practice
6) Strong nursing presence throughout the organization
Within such organizations, nurses are responsible for integrating curative aspects
of care into the nurse-client mutual patterning process to create healing changes. Healing
is recognized as the primary goal as defined by the client and within the client’s power to
attain. Curing is recognized as an empirically defined objective that may or may not be
attainable. Within this perspective, the nurse’s focus is on facilitating a healing
experience for the client and family.

Characteristic 4: In a healing environment, the nurse is recognized within the health

care setting as the professional with the potential for the greatest impact in creating
this environment.

Subjects’ responses echo Nightingale’s view that nursing is the profession

accountable for creating an environment that facilitates client healing. First and foremost,
the nurse is responsible for providing a safe, comfortable, and supportive environment in
the face of the fearful experiences and challenges posed by health care problems. The
nurse partners with the client to co-create the energetic capacity for making desired

87
changes and expanding awareness that leads to healing. Mutuality of intent between the
client and nurse creates synchrony within their energy fields. The rhythmicity of this
mutual process shifts wave pattern frequency from a lower to higher level within the
energy field. Using this mutual process, the client and nurse partner in patterning changes
in the human and environmental fields that facilitate client healing. The nurse in mutual
process with the client is thus the most significant environmental influence on the healing
process.

Characteristic 5: In a healing environment, nursing practice is theory-based with a

professional focus on designing client-centered care that facilitates healing.

Study findings strongly supported the position that theory based practice is the
foundation of professional nursing and a significant characteristic of a healing
environment. A conceptual framework is considered essential to the definition of the
nurse-client relationship, applying expert knowledge in clinical situations, providing
professional level services, and structuring processes used in creating a healing
environment. Responses to interview questions illustrated the significant and substantive
extent to which the subjects had integrated theoretical concepts into their practice.
Though the SUHB was the conceptual framework used by these subjects, they were not
parochial in their advocacy that a theoretical framework be used to guide practice; their
important concern was that practice be based on a well-defined nursing theoretical
framework. Findings reflected the practical and effective application of theoretical
concepts in a wide variety of clinical situations.

Characteristic 6: In a healing environment, the organizational culture supports

balancing individualization of healing experiences with standardization of best
curative practices.

Study findings support the notion that creating a healing environment requires
providing the capability to individualize client services and access to systems that support

88
the appraisal and documentation of healing manifestations. These findings highlight the
challenge faced by conventional health care settings to provide the capacity to
individualize client care within a culture that considers standardization essential for safe
clinical management. Curative practice standards are mandated by regulatory,
professional oversight and payer organizations. These powerful pressures have significant
influence in determining the organizational culture. Organizations must be able to both
meet the requirements of external forces to standardize care while concurrently ensuring
individualization of care create the opportunity and conditions for nurses to provide care
that is individualized and focused on facilitating healing.

Characteristic 7: In a healing environment, a healing philosophy is embedded in the

professional culture and organizational core values.

Underlying other organizational factors is a philosophical position reflected in the

day-to-day practice of health care, one that embraces healing as an overriding
commitment. This patient centered, healing philosophy is integrated into organizational
policies, inter-professional role relationships, infrastructure, cultural norms, and
leadership patterns. Healing practices and outcomes are evaluated as quality indicators
and used as parameters of individual and organizational success. This philosophy is
manifested through the acceptance of client perspectives and decisions. Nurses in this
environment are mindful of their own values and beliefs and consciously avoid imposing
these on their clients. The nurse views the client as a partner in a healing journey in
pursuit of meaning.

Summary

Study findings reported in this chapter were organized according to research

questions. Themes were inferred from subject responses to interview questions related to
the following: observations of client manifestations of healing; conditions and
relationships characteristic of healing environments; nursing practices and processes
facilitative of client healing. The fourteen themes derived from subject responses

89
reflected: The client determines his/her healing trajectory; the nurse is the most important
influence in creating a healing environment; and nursing practices that engage the client
as partner are the most effective in facilitating healing experiences. Using these thematic
findings, this investigator formulated an integrative narrative response to the main
research question: What are the characteristics of a healing environment as described by
expert nurses who practice within the conceptual framework of Rogers’ SUHB. Seven
characteristics were formulated highlighting the respect for client autonomy, power of
client-nurse partnership, individualization of care, nursing’s unique role in facilitating
healing, the importance of relationships and organizational culture, and the value of
theory based nursing practice.

90
 Chapter 5:

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusions

This chapter presents the investigator’s conclusions relative to study findings and
offers recommendations for their application. In a qualitative study, the information
source is critical to achieving the goals. This investigator acquired information for this
study from nine expert nurses who practice within the framework of the Science of
Unitary Human Beings. These nine nurses described a level of practice that was rooted in
a theoretically-based understanding of nursing, and a clearly articulated commitment to
helping patients heal. The subjects’ responses to interview questions reflected a grasp of
the complex knowledge base that is characteristic of expert nurses and, also demonstrated
an appreciation for the power of simple acts in bringing about healing.
There were fourteen themes inferred from the subject interviews. This
investigator interpreted these themes within the context of the interviews as a whole, and
formulated an integrative narrative of seven characteristics of a healing environment.
Based on these findings, the investigator derived five conclusions:

Conclusion 1: The findings of the study are congruent with the theoretical concepts
of the Science of Unitary Human Beings.

The majority of the themes are congruent with the human-environmental field
processes shaped by the three principles of homeodynamics: resonancy (reflects direction
and flow of field change), helicy (reflects the nature of field change), and integrality
reflects the process of field change). Pattern (the distinguishing characteristic of an
energy filed) is linked to one theme and pandimensionality (a view of reality that has

91
infinite dimensions) is linked to two themes. The themes related to theory based practice
are linked to the science of nursing (the organized knowledge base of the profession) and
the art of nursing (the creative application of nursing science). Table 4 specifies the
themes discovered in this study and lists the SUHB concepts linked to each theme.
The first four themes relate changes in clients that the subjects described as
manifestations of healing. The theme described as “recognizes the need for change and
demonstrates intent to change” is consistent with the principles of helicy and resonancy,
dynamics that reflect the nature and direction of change. The theme described as
“engages knowingly in reorienting and mutually patterning the energy field” reflects all
three principles of homeodynamics. Being knowingly engaged is indicative of the client’s
recognition of the nature of the change (helicy); reorienting is indicative that the client
understands the change in direction (resonancy); and mutual patterning reflects an
understanding of the process of change (integrality). The theme described as “expresses
sense of expanded awareness and sense of connectedness with self, others, and a greater
whole” is congruent with the concepts of integrality and pandimensionality;
connectedness reflects integrality, and expanded awareness reflects pandimensionality.
The theme described as “exhibits observable and intuitively understood human field
pattern changes” is linked to the concepts of pattern and helicy, implying pattern
appraisal and recognizing the nature of change.
The next six themes reflect the conditions and relationships subjects reported as
characteristics of a healing environment. The theme described as “right relationship with
self and others” reflects the dynamics of helicy, resonancy and integrality. Establishing
right relationship implies the client understands the nature and the direction of change
necessary, and that the process of relating is an integral dynamic. “Intentional mutual
process” reflects the principle of integrality. The theme described as ”energetic influences
from collective relational experiences” is congruent with the principles of
integrality and helicy. Integrality indicates understanding that collective relational
experiences have an impact on individual relationships. Helicy reflects a recognition that
the nature of these energetic influences are carried into specific relationships, such as one

92
Table 4: Themes: Links to SUHB Concepts

Themes Concepts

What changes in clients did the subjects describe as manifestations of healing?

Recognizes the need for change and demonstrates intent to Helicy and Resonancy
change
Engages knowingly in reorienting and mutually patterning Helicy,Integrality,Resonancy
the energy field.
Expresses sense of expanded awareness and sense of Pandimensionality and
connectedness with self, others, and a greater whole Integrality
Exhibits observable and intuitively understood human field Helicy and Patterns
pattern changes

What conditions and relationships did subjects report as characteristic of healing

environments?

Right relationship with self and meaningful others Helicy, Resonancy, Integrality
Intentional mutual process Integrality
Energetic influences from collective relational experiences Helicy and Integrality
Client centered design Integrality, Helicy, Art of
Nursing (implied
individualization)
Healthy nursing culture facilitates a healing environment Integrality, Helicy, Resonancy
Philosophically grounded, open and in search of meaning Helicy, Resonancy, Integrality
Pandimensionality

What nursing practices and processes did subjects report as facilitative of client healing?

Theory based practice SUHB Science and Art of

Nursing
Nurse as environment Integrality
Appraisal and mutual patterning Helicy, Integrality, Resonancy,
Pattern
Nursing art of designing care Art of Nursing Values: respect,
responsibility and empathy
(implied individualization)

93
between the client and the nurse. “Client-centered design” of the patient’s surroundings
reflects the principles of integrality and helicy, that is, the human field and environmental
field are in constant mutual process and changing in innovative ways. “Client-centered
design” also relates to the values of nursing identified in the theory of the art of nursing
practice. These values include respect, responsibility, and empathy and imply
individualization, which is a necessity in respecting unique needs of the client. The theme
described as “a healthy nursing culture facilitates a healing environment” incorporates all
three principles of homeodynamics: integrality (process), helicy (nature), and resonancy
(direction). The theme described as “philosophically grounded, open and in search of
meaning” reflects all three principles of homeodynamics (resonancy, helicy, and
integrality) and the concept of pandimensionality. This theme implies recognition of the
nature, direction and process of the change associated with a philosophically grounded
search for meaning. It also implies an understanding of relationships and connections that
are without spatial or temporal boundaries (pandimensionality).
The last four themes reflect the nursing practices and processes that subjects
identified as facilitative of client healing. “Theory-based practice” is directly linked with
the SUHB concepts of the Science of Nursing and the Art of Nursing. Rogers asserted
that nursing is a science with the unique body of knowledge, and that the art of nursing is
in applying that knowledge base in a creative and innovative way that meets the
individual needs of clients. The theme described as “nurse as environment” reflects the
concept of integrality, the nurse (as a key influence in the client’s environment) is in
mutual process with the client. The theme described as “appraisal and mutual patterning”
is associated with all three homeodynamic principles and the concept of pattern. The
“nursing art of designing care” theme is linked to the concepts of nursing as an art, and
the art of nursing incorporates specific values (respect, responsibility, and empathy) and
individualization of care. Subject responses demonstrated a high level of theoretical
integration of these concepts into their practice.
Results of this study can be used to assist nurses in interpreting the SUHB into
concrete, practical, and powerful practices that have potential to influence the healing

94
experiences of individual clients and to help reorient nursing care delivery in
organizations. This inductive analytical view of nursing practice supports the position
that structuring nursing practice within a SUHB framework is feasible; this study
provides evidence contradictory to claims that such a theory is not a practical basis for
nursing care delivery. SUHB frequently has been used as a framework for research or
nursing modality evaluation; therefore, the literature has been written by and directed
toward nurses with graduate level preparation. The challenge appears to be finding a way
to communicate SUHB concepts and practice applications in a manner that resonates with
nurses who are more representative of the general nursing population. Though this
sample of expert nurses is not representative of the general nursing population, their
practice exemplars are reflective of client care experiences common to all nurses. In early
presentations of selected findings from this study, this investigator found that nurse
clinicians, who were collaborating to revise a practice model, connected both cognitively
and intuitively with the messages inherent in the study themes and exemplars. This
suggests that these study findings might be useful to others interested in exploring
clinical applications of SUHB concepts, particularly if the language of SUHB can be
“translated” into concepts more accessible to the practicing nurse.

Conclusion 2: Relationship is the most powerful influence in the healing process.

Throughout the interviews, the subjects emphasized the power of relationships in

creating a healing environment. They noted that clients who are facing health challenges
also are frequently dealing with complicated internal discord and fractured relationships
with meaningful others. Discordant relationships, whether with self or others, diminish
the energy field. Subjects emphasized that reconciling relationships, internally with self
and with meaningful others, increases the energy field and significantly increases the
probability of healing change. Within a trusted nurse-client relationship, the subjects
observed that the client appeared safe to explore the meaning of his/or current health
problem and the life pattern context within which it occurred. The subjects noted that the

95
nurse supports the client’s defined intent to heal relative to specific problems and his/her
intentionality to achieve a life pattern healing. As voiced by one subject, the nurse’s role
is to help the clients recognize and claim the possibilities of his/her infinite potential.
As health services have become more specialized and technology laden, the
relational aspects of care have been marginalized. Additional barriers have been created
with the growing nursing shortage and other resource constraints. Curative interventions
are given priority over relational care. Groups such as the Institute of Medicine, the
Fetzer-Pew Commission, and various nursing organizations have called for the
implementation of Relationship Centered Care (RCC) which has been shown to bring
about measurable improvement in client outcomes, service operations, safety, and
satisfaction of both staff and clients.
Subjects in this study emphasized the importance of assuring that relationships
between nurses and other professionals are healthy. They noted that discordant
relationships among the work group have an impact on the nurse-client relationship, and
on all other relationships. These findings mirror study findings, positions, and
recommendations being made at the national level that Relationship Centered Care
become a structural expectation in health care organizations and a central part of the
education of health professionals. Nurse leaders should actively support the move toward
implementing Relationship Centered Care. This type of environment change can facilitate
reorienting health professionals and organizational decision makers to the centrality of
nursing’s role in healing and how relationships affect the implementation of this role.

Conclusion 3: Nursing's central role of placing the patient in the best position to heal
must be understood, asserted, and supported in order to create a healing
environment.

Fifty per cent of the themes inferred from subject interviews were related to nurse
relationships with her/his clients. In 1992, Quinn asserted the notion that the nurse is the
client’s healing environment. his notion has roots as old as Nightingale and as visionary

96
as 21st century concepts derived from quantum physics. ne of the themes from this
study, “nurse as environment”, echoes Quinn’s message. oicing her view within the
context of SUHB, Quinn reflects on the “nurse as environment”:
Think of the nurse as the environment of the client. [From] this
perspective, turn towards her/his understanding of the
nurse self as an energetic, vibrational field, integral with the
client’s environment. Questions we might ask if this
is the focus might be, if I am the environment for this
client, how can I be a more healing environment? How
can I become a safe space, a sacred healing vessel
for this client in this moment? In what ways can I look
at, into this person to draw out healing? How can I
use my consciousness, my being, my voice, my touch,
my faith, for healing? (p. 28)

Nurses confront major barriers as they attempt to “be” the healing environment
for their clients in an industrialized health care setting where nursing’s role is defined by
medical management priorities and clinical standardization (Cowling 2004). In a study of
quality nursing care, Gunther and Alligood (2002) found that quality nursing care has
been defined as a product rather than a professional service. They observed that nursing
care is not evaluated based on achieving the individualized goals of the client, but based
on the curative or service outcomes defined by the health care organization. The findings
in this study indicate that to fulfill their healing role, nurses must be able to practice in an
environment where their central function is perceived to be helping the client to heal.
Since most health service organizations operate within a medical model
orientation (focus on diagnosis and curative interventions), the challenge is effectively
influencing decision makers to affirm that facilitating the healing role of the nurse is in
the best interest of the organization. In recent decades, nurses have been co-opted into
assuming greater and greater responsibility for functions that primarily maintain
operations rather serve the patient directly. As a result, nursing’s central role (putting the
patient in the best position to heal) has been diminished or lost. In order to re-establish
the preeminence of healing as nursing’s central role, nurse leaders will need to present an
evidence-based case for allocating the necessary time and resources and for relinquishing

97
non-nursing service maintenance functions. In the literature review, several cited studies
provide evidence that a healing environment improves health outcomes, increases
satisfaction, and decreases costs. The challenge is in expanding and effectively using this
evidence to produce the changes needed so that nurses can return to their central nursing
role.

Conclusion 4: Theory-based practice is essential to professional level care.

Theory-based nursing is the means for advancing professional level practice as

described by these nurse experts. Without a conceptual framework for guidance, nurses
are at risk of having their practice defined by technical functions. Theory-based practice
provides the nurse with the framework for autonomously determining how to design and
implement professional level care. Based on a review of healing environment literature
and an analysis of these study findings, this investigator concluded that nurses who use
theory to guide their practice are more likely to consider creating a healing environment
and facilitating healing as central functions of their role.
Findings from this study indicate that designing individualized care is essential to
creating a healing environment and is a hallmark of professional practice. The curative
aspects of care involve a myriad of standardized technical interventions. Designing care
is directed specifically toward providing the information, resources, and practice
modalities that will be responsive to the appraisal of the client’s unique pattern.
Inferences from subject interviews indicate a professional nurse, guided by nursing
theory, can skillfully incorporate needed curative interventions into an artfully designed
plan to facilitate healing. Subjects suggest the design may include creative and energetic
modalities, such as guided imagery, therapeutic touch, journaling, music, art, and
movement exercises. In addition, the design may provide a variety of options for the
client to expand his/her knowledge about developing a healthy life pattern. Subjects
emphasized that the design should be developed collaboratively with the client by using a
conceptually grounded approach. As the subjects clearly articulated, the striking

98
characteristic of this partnership is that the nurse serves as a guide and expert resource,
but does not attempt to control the client’s choices or experiences. According to these
subjects, the nurse respects and honors the client’s right and responsibility to determine
his/her own healing journey. Nursing theories in general, and SUHB specifically, provide
the framework for designing this type of care.
This investigator was struck by the extent to which theoretical orientation defined
the practice of the nurses in this study. Though all of the subjects were experts, they were
educated, located, and practiced in diverse places. The one thing they had in common
was use of the SUHB to guide their practices. Interviews revealed a high degree of
congruence regarding how they viewed their professional role, how they structured
practice, and how they related to clients. Their commitment to nursing goals took priority
over all other responsibilities. This investigator inquired about how theory is addressed in
basic and graduate nursing education. As has been the case in service, nursing theory has
been marginalizd in deference to educational foci on curative interventions and use of
technology. This investigator has concluded that a return to emphasis on nursing as a
unique profession is related to a return to nursing theory as a guide to practice.

Conclusion 5: Individualizing and partnering are as critical to healing as best

practices and clinical standardization are to curing.

Study subjects indicated that individualization of patient care is essential to

creating a healing environment. Individualization is a significant aspect of SUHB concept
of the Science and Art of Nursing Practice. As indicated in the themes, the client
identifies his/her individual needs and sets the trajectory for healing. Though there are no
mandates requiring organizations to provide structures with the capacity to individualize
care, users of health care services are making their dissatisfaction within different health
care services evident through public and political discourse. Nurses have voiced a strong
preference for supportive environments as reflected in work force trends and professional
publications. Client and nurse satisfaction are the priority incentives to create

99
organizational structures with the capacity for creating healing environments while
maintaining necessary standardization of curative functions. Findings from this and other
studies, for example, Malloch (1997), indicate organizations that value healing and
provide the conditions necessary to create healing environments increased both nurse and
client satisfaction.
This investigator has concluded clinical leaders can impact the structure of
nursing care delivery through revision of Nursing Practice models. Over the past two
decades, Nursing Practice Models have followed the standardization trends prevalent in
most health service organizations. Rather than designing care plans for individuals,
nurses frequently “pull up” a standardized, electronic care plan that addresses common
problems associated with the client’s diagnosis. Some think the care has been
individualized if preferences regarding an intervention are noted. This investigator has
concluded that to create a balance between individualizing and partnering with clients
and standardizing best curative practices will require reorienting nursing philosophy and
restructuring practice tools.

Recommendations

The findings in this study point to the need for professional exploration of how
nurses can fully develop the capacity for creating healing environments. This investigator
chose to recommend questions for consideration and formal inquiry by key professional
leadership groups.
Recommend academic leaders, faculty and researchers consider:
• Do baccalaureate graduates have the preparation in theory based
practice necessary to actualize a professional role?
• Do graduate level students have adequate preparation in theory based
practice and inquiry to provide leadership in clinical applications of
theory?
• Are educators evaluating what students use to guide their practice?

100
 • Are nurse researchers studying healing and the healing role of the
nurse in ways that will impact practice and health services policy?
• Are nurse researchers investigating the impact of decreased
opportunities for nurses to create relationships with clients in current
health care cultures?
• Are nurse researchers investigating the influence of healing
environments on patient outcomes?
Recommend nurse leaders and advanced practice nurses employed in clinical
settings consider:
• Are nurse leaders asserting nursing’s healing role in ways that impact
organizational philosophy, design, goal orientation, resource planning,
and evaluation?
• Do nursing practice models reflect healing as a central focus? If not,
what then and why? Are we satisfied with models that ignore healing?
How do we introduce these into current environments?
• Are nursing quality measures sensitive to healing processes and
outcomes? Can healing practices be ascertained, understood,
documented, or measured through existing metrics?
• Are nurse leader organizations or professional policy groups
advocating for structural supports to create healing environments in
health care settings?
These considerations are directed at specific groups and made in the form of
questions to stimulate inquiry among key leaders in nursing to reexamine professional
commitment to nursing’s unique role in facilitating client healing. This investigator plans
to disseminate these questions to relevant groups through publications and presentations.
In addition, this investigator will be working with a group of clinically based nurse
leaders in a large academic health science center to revise the organization’s Practice
Model in order to create a balance between facilitating individualized client healing and
implementing standardized best curative practices. The group’s stated purpose is to

101
develop a model as a foundation for creating a healing environment. This project will be
evaluated and the results published. Others may find that pursuing analogous initiatives
might strengthen their nursing culture and positively impact client care.

Summary

The purpose of this study was to identify and describe characteristics of a healing
environment from a nursing perspective. Using a qualitative methodology, this
investigator interviewed a purposeful sample of 9 expert nurses who practice within the
conceptual framework of Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings (SUHB). Data were
collected through phone interviews. There were fourteen themes inferred from the subject
interviews. These themes were organized into three categories correspondent to three of
the research questions; the three categories are: manifestations of healing, relationships
and conditions characteristic of a healing environment, and nursing practices and
processes identified as facilitative of healing. The investigator integrated the thematic
findings from the subject interview responses with conceptions inferred from the
interviews as a whole to formulate an interpretive narrative description of seven
characteristics of a healing environment. These characteristics emphasized respect for
client autonomy, power of client-nurse partnership, individualization of care, nursing’s
unique role in facilitating healing, the importance of relationships and organizational
culture, and the value of theory based nursing practice. From the findings, the
investigator concluded that: there was congruence between themes identified from
subject responses and SUHB core concepts; that relationship is the most powerful
influence on the healing process; that nursing’s role is central to creating a healing
environment; that theory based practice is essential to professional level care; and that
individualizing and partnering are as critical to healing as best practices and clinical
standardization are to curing. Based on study findings and literature review, this
investigator recommended specific questions to guide assessment of the status of

102
research, education and practice development and application of knowledge about the
creation of healing environment from a nursing perspective.

103
 APPENDIX A:

SAMPLE COMMUNICATIONS AND

DATA COLLECTION TOOLS

The following generic forms and related processes were approved by the UTMB
Institutional Review Board for communication with study subjects, interview conduct,
information verification, and data management.

Confirmation of Subjects Participation in Study

Demographic Profile Form

Interview Guide

Request for Interview Verification

104
 Confirmation of Subjects Participation in Study

Dear Subject,

This e-mail is a follow up to our telephone conversation and serves to confirm your verbal
agreement to be interviewed for my dissertation study entitled Characteristics of a Healing
Environment as Described by Nurses who Practice Within the Theoretical Framework of
Rogers Science of Unitary Human Beings. In accord with IRB procedure, your agreement to
participate in the interview affirms your consent to participate in the study Attached you will
find a demographic form and the interview guide. You will note that the demographic form
has space for a pseudonym. This pseudonym will be used to identify tape recordings,
transcripts, and other tools that require data source tracking. Your identity will remain
confidential. When the study is complete, the tape recordings of our interview and all other
documents linking you with specific data sets will be destroyed. I would enjoy having you
provide a pseudonym for me to use; if you prefer, however, I will assign one. I would
appreciate your completing the demographic form and returning to me by e-mail. I will be
using the attached interview guide for our telephone interview; I do not want a written
response prior to the interview..

Please e-mail me notice of 2 or 3 times that you could be available in the near future for a
telephone interview. Based on your availability, I will schedule an interview time

If you need clarification or would like to contact me for any reason, you may reach me at
work 409-772-8200, at home 409-762-9059, by fax 409 747-1531, by cell 409-392-1159 or
e-mail pwaters@utmb.edu. My mailing address is recorded below my signature.

I really appreciate your agreeing to be in my study. Each of the study participants was
carefully selected. You truly represent an important practice and scholarship perspective.
I look forward to talking with you soon.

Best regards,
Phyllis J. Waters, RN, MS
The University of Texas Medical Branch
School of Nursing
301 University Blvd.
Galveston, TX 77555-1132

105
 Demographic Data Form

CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALING ENVIRONMENT

AS DESCRIBED BY EXPERT NURSES WHO PRACTICE WITHIN
THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
OF ROGERS’ SCIENCE OF UNITARY HUMAN BEINGS: A
QUALITATIVE STUDY
Phyllis J. Waters, RN, MS

1. Pseudonym: Date:
2. Indicate age category
___ 21 – 30 ___ 41 – 50 ___ 61 – 70
___ 31 – 40 ___ 51 – 60 ___ over 70
3. Indicate gender: Female ______ Male ______
4. What is your ethnicity: ( √ the best response)

___ Caucasian, ___ African American, ___ Hispanic

non-Hispanic non-Hispanic

___ American Indian or ___ Asian or Pacific ___ Other (please specify)
Alaskan Native Islander _________________
___ Unknown
5. What is your current marital status ( √ one response)
___ Never married ___ Separated ___ Married

___ Widowed ___ Divorced ___ Living with significant

other
6. What region of the country do you reside in? ( √ one response)
___ Northeast ___ East ___ Southeast
___ Northern mid-west ___ Mid-west ___ Southern mid-west
___ Northwest ___ West ___ Southwest
7. Since initial registration, how many years have you been employed in nursing?____

8.
Please attach a CV or resume. If none is available, please describe your educational
background and experience in nursing (attach description or record on back of this form).

106
 Interview Guide

CHARACTERISTICS OF A HEALING ENVIRONMENT

AS DESCRIBED BY EXPERT NURSES WHO PRACTICE WITHIN THE
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF ROGERS’ SCIENCE OF UNITARY
HUMAN BEINGS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Phyllis J. Waters

Thank you for agreeing to participate in this study. My interest is in the characteristics of healing
environment as described by expert nurses who use Rogers Science of unitary Human Beings as
their framework for practice. You were selected because the published descriptions of your
practice activities indicated you would be a good informant on this subject. In responding to my
questions, I would like for you to relate to your own clinical practice as specifically as possible.
It may be helpful to envision one or more patients you have cared for in framing your responses.

1. When you make the clinical judgment that a client is exhibiting manifestations of healing,
one could posit that part of your judgment is based on changes you have observed. Can you
tell me about those changes that you consider manifestations of healing, as you perceive
them?
Prompt Questions:
1.1 Can you describe for me how you perceived these changes as reflective of
healing?
1.2 Is there any particular order, sequence or pattern to the changes?

2. Can you recall the conditions that were associated with these changes
Prompt Questions
2.1 In your view, were relationships important in bringing about these changes?
If so, can you describe those relationships and their impact?
2.2 In your view, were ideological or philosophical perspectives a factor in
bringing about these changes? If so, can you describe those perspectives
and how they influenced the changes you observed?
2.3 From your perspective, were there physical environment or aesthetic factors
that were important in bringing about these changes? If so, can you describe
the nature of these factors and their significance?
2.4 From your perspective, were there any institutional or structural factors that
played a role in bringing about these changes? If so, could you describe
them and their impact?

3. Can you describe for me the nursing practices you think are important in bringing about the
changes you consider manifestations of client healing?

4. Is there anything else you think is important about creating a healing environment?

107
 Request for Interview Verification

Dear Subject,

Attached to this e-mail is a transcript of our interview and the Interview Guide that was
used. I would like to ask you to verify your responses reflected in the transcript. The
purpose is not for you to try to recall the interview per se, but to verify that what is
recorded accurately reflects your perspectives, interpretations and conclusions regarding
the practice experiences and observations you shared.

Please make your corrections or additions on the transcript draft. You will note that each
line is numbered and there is space provided to the side for you to make corrections,
comments or additions. I would appreciate your making additions that you believe will
clarify or enhance the information. Space is available at the end of the transcript for
lengthier contributions. If it is convenient for you, make the corrections on the electronic
version of the transcript and return to me by e-mail; use the “forward” function to assure I
receive your changes. If it is more convenient for you to make hand written entries on a
hard copy, please let me know and I will send you a hard copy of this document as well
as a stamped, self addressed envelope. Either e-mail or hard copy feedback will be
appreciated.

Again, I would like to thank you for your willingness to work with me.

Best regards,
Phyllis J. Waters, RN, MS
The University of Texas Medical Branch
School of Nursing
301 University Blvd.
Galveston, TX 77555-1132

108
 APPENDIX B:

COMBINED THEMES DOCUMENTATION

Healing Manifestations Themes

I. Recognizes need and demonstrates intent to heal

A. Subject A

When there is a constraint or some dissonance in the energy field that may
come from an illness or a behavioral issue, the dissatisfaction begins to
grow and the tension comes to an aware level and people decide, ‘I want
to change’. They gather information, look at alternatives as a result of this
information and decide it is what they want to do and further decide on a
course of action for themselves. As they participate in this the orientation
of their energy field changes and as it does, you begin to see changes in
the field itself as is evidenced by manifestations. Sometimes the changes
in the field are overt, subtle, deliberate, or maybe unaware, or it could be
very blatant.

B. Subject E

It’s like the pain brings them through the door but the things that we really
work on together is how they can generate different options for themselves
and really free themselves from how they saw themselves before. That is
the emancipatory piece of healing. They have their self definition of their
field and who and what they are and something impinges on that which
creates discomfort for them and when we work together and create this
new and unique field, what happens is they find that they are freed up
from their prior identity. They have new ways of being in relationship
with themselves and other people.

C. Subject W

A study that I did with nurses and the patients with whom they worked in
a healing setting gave me some important insight. Both nurses and clients
had suffered the incidents in their lives made them look different, seem
different, turned them around, caused them great difficulty. Often these

109
 were losses or major health events but they were events that made them sit
back and say, ‘Where and who am I? Where am I going? What’s my life
all about?’ The emotional crisis evolved from the obvious life crisis. That
was the groundwork for something to happen. That recognition is the
beginning of healing. You don’t have real healing as I’m describing it
without that recognition. So the key to movement toward the healing
experience is the person recognizing that something needs to change….
[In the self and environment].

D. Subject A

When people have things going on in their lives that they are no longer
willing to tolerate, then there is some level of intention. Sometimes that
level of intention may not even be in their conscious awareness but it is
there. Some part of their energy field begins to express, ‘We’ve got to
change’. So that subtle movement begins. At some point it brings it to
their conscious awareness and they recognize, ‘I can’t live like this’ in the
case of people who are addicted to substances. Or, ‘I don’t want to live
like this anymore’. So what is needed to change? One of the
manifestations of healing is the subtle changes that begin to almost
snowball until they get to the conscious awareness of, ‘I’m not happy with
the way things are and I want to change’. There is a growing discontent
that brings to the forefront the need for change.

E. Subject W

I was trying to get some sense of order or some sense of flow between
focused intent and intentionality. Here I am defining intent as a process.
Intent as a person’s focus on changing something specific. Intentionality is
a move into the capacity to become whole, which is a much broader one
than intending to change a particular aspect of your energy field. So the
process of moving from intent to intentionality or from intentionality to a
focused intent really depends on the individual’s situation and how they
perceive this situation. There is this movement, like a circle, I guess,
between intention and intentionality and intention. One informs the other
and they go on together to form a whole. There is awareness that the
person has that will help the flow between a focused intention to change
something or one aspect of their life or a focused area to a broader
understanding that this is a reflection of their whole. Then the
intentionality to shift into a different way of being occurs. Then sometimes
you will have people who really start with a sense of their awareness is
they are becoming a whole person and then they come out of this place
and focus on changes that would be highly intent in nature.

110
 F. Subject W

I think one of the most important things in healing is the sense in purpose
and meaning and direction. This also comes from one’s unique
intentionality. Intent to change is immensely important. We tend to change
our orientation. When we change our orientation the direction of the
energy flow changes because we’ve shifted. We’ve made a conscious
decision to do things differently. When we do this energy flow changes,
the patterns change and the manifestations of patterns change.

II. Engages knowingly in reorienting and mutually patterning energy field.

A. Subject M

When you are looking at the sequence of healing, you are basically
looking at the client’s definition of their start point. Where something they
want is not present in their lives and they are moving toward that. The
client finds where they think they are in their goals for healing and where
they want to go. They tell me what is getting in their way and that’s where
I very often use imagery because it is a way of changing beliefs and often
it is the belief systems that are blocking the person’s healing.

B. Subject W

Clients go through the process of trying to figure out what to do and

learning different ways of dealing with things. Changing interpersonal
relationships, changing environments. They work really hard at this phase,
through the healing process, and then all of a sudden there is another shift
and they really feel transformed.

C. Subject B

There is a difference between curing and healing. If you are working with
someone who is dying of cancer, their cancer is not going away and it’s
there, but they can still have a healing experience. They can be healed by
recognizing the wholeness of who they are and looking at things and
seeing them in a different way than they’ve ever seen them before. One of
my patients – a young man who had HIV and was dying – began this
experience because he felt compassion and concern from a human being
that really loved him, which is a love for human kind. We really know that
this is genuine and sincere. I think that is what we do as nurses. We
provide a special kind of love. It’s unconditional and is a genuine love for
humanity.

111
 D. Subject B

Sometimes healing takes place in strange ways. A patient that I worked

with said, ‘I remember you, I remember you for just the few minutes that I
was in here and you touched me and I could feel your energy.’ It tells you
that the transpersonal is very powerful, doesn’t it? It’s present and it also
tells you that we do have this as a potential and we just need to use it.

E. Subject C

I can tell you it seems like there is an emotion associated with the
movement. What happens is that the meaning that is in all of that seems to
feel to be like fuel. You would think that if it is an emotional experience it
would be draining, but it isn’t, it’s energizing. When you are engaged and
you know you are and they know you are, things move quicker – it speeds
up – it’s like the whole process of getting well with whatever is going on
and it goes more rapidly. There is an emotional component of healing. If
somebody had resentments and there is a sudden shift where the person
that is being held in this very hard hearted and resentful way is suddenly
turned to in a different way so that instead of resentment and hate there is
a sudden moment of understanding the other’s position, they finally see
and get, ‘That’s why’. If forgiveness happens in that moment, I would say
they come into new relationship with that other person, whether the other
person is there or not, it doesn’t matter. Typically when that happens, the
person is higher than a kite for days in terms of energy. The person’s
physical limit of energy seems boundless. So, I would say energy is freed
in that system and that can be used now for more growth and movement
towards wholeness.

F. Subject M

When the frequency of energy is high, that’s when you get lots of rapid
changes. At the other end when the wavelengths are long and the
frequency is low, changes are still going on but at a much slower rate.
Rogers believes that change takes place through wave length frequency. It
takes place at different speeds, so to speak. Although it is not a continuum,
you can shift from low to high very quickly and back again or all over the
place. But the idea is when you are at a very high frequency point then
changes take place rapidly, in an instant. Denser energies are the lower
level frequencies.

112
G. Subject M

One of my clients had a tremendous healing power obviously since she

had gotten herself walking again after being told she could not. They told
her there was no point in having any more chemotherapy as it wouldn’t
help her but she believed it was helping her. She kept having it so for her
that was healing. She did want therapeutic touch and imagery but did not
want herbs or any of those other alternative therapies for cancer. She was
very engaged in how she expressed her healing needs.

H Subject V

If they can respond to humor then we may have moved down the line
towards healing. So to the degree that they can claim the possibilities, you
see them coming into a healing mode. We’re engaging the energy to help
them move to a new state of being. It is partly my energy and partly their
energy and partly universal energy. It is moving them to a new state of
being.

I. Subject M

So people who are moving towards healing are people who are usually
shifting from lower to higher power choices and from less awareness to
more awareness. From lesser freedom to act on their intentions to greater
freedom to act on their intentions. And in involving themselves in ways
that help them to get to where they want to go. There are four dimensions
of power [awareness, choice, freedom to act intentionally, and
involvement in creating changes]. When the four dimensions operate
together, then its power. When you look at power, you look at all four
dimensions in relation to each other. This power enables clients to
knowingly participate in change. Information enters the patient’s field and
allows them to participate in creating change. First they gather the
information and look at their options and then they get necessary
information that helps to shift their directionality. Then they are open to
new information.

J. Subject E

How they relate to their experience changes. It’s like they open to new
information and they are released to have access to universal energy. They
are able to process and integrate new information that allows them to
move forward and change. Where they came in perceiving themselves as
defined by or described by their pain experience or their illness

113
 experience, when they move through this process they look back and see
themselves in a different way.

III. Expresses sense of expanded awareness and sense of connectedness with self,
others, and a greater whole

A. Subject S

There is an expanded awareness and people are connecting in ways that

they haven’t been connecting before. Moving from an isolated,
fragmented position into a connected, more coherently whole position.
They come into our substance abuse program feeling isolated and alone
and they are not feeling connected to anything outside themselves. They
are running their life on a battery, as opposed to having an alternator
helping the battery along. When they see they can quietly resolve issues in
their lives by reflection they feel a great relief.

B. Subject W

After patients have gone through a series of treatments with nurses using
alternative therapies, I’ve noticed that although they may still have the
illness, they feel like they know themselves more and they are more
comfortable with themselves. Feel more a part of the world and the
universe. It was a real sense of being a part of a greater whole for both the
nurses and the clients. So their healing is the connection with themselves
and their connection with others and their expanded connection at a
universal level. I also think that everybody has the capacity to heal.
Different cultures use different mechanisms to facilitate this. I think in
other cultures there is an expanded awareness that is not necessarily put
down in words. It may be put down in symbols, in movement, or in art. In
Brazil; for example, women have this ceremony where they are taken over
by a spirit. They dance the spirit and it is very complicated. But it is
healing for them when they participate in this. In Japan people looked at
me so strange when I ask, ‘What do you think healing is?’ It is a very
spiritual culture from their perspective and that is how they understand it.
There is a lot of ways in terms of feeling connected to the environment
and nature and in honoring ancestors, for example. This honoring of
ancestors and feeling this continuity over generations creates this universal
sense of connection. So as a part of responding to the recognition of the
need to heal or change, one of the things that happens is that people have a
sense of connection with expanding beyond themselves and to the
universe. The sense of connection with themselves internally and with the
rest of the universe has expanded.

114
C. Subject S

When I work with people my whole goal is to expand their awareness.

This is really all I do. When I notice that this has happened, that their
awareness has expanded, that is one of the manifestations of healing that I
recognize. I see two levels of manifestation. One is by taking action for
themselves through their expanded awareness and the other is by sharing
in very specific ways with others about this change within themselves.
They tend to bring people in that they feel connected with and want to
make them a part of the healing process that they are experiencing.

D. Subject D

This seems to be a big thing with people I’ve worked with who are
seriously ill and dying. It’s exploring their spiritual side and very often
there is a transformation with whatever their orientation had been and very
often they’ve not been keeping in touch with their spiritual nature, yet it
comes back. So, one of the manifestations that are fairly consistent is
moving back to a sense of unity or a sense of wholeness or coherence –
connection with that which is greater than oneself. So people who are
moving towards healing are people who are usually shifting from lower
power to higher power choices.

E. Subject D

People having what we might term as spiritual awakenings are good

examples of healing. This seems to be a big thing with people I’ve worked
with who are seriously ill and dying. It’s exploring their spiritual side and
very often there is a transformation with whatever their orientation had
been and very often they’ve not been keeping in touch with their spiritual
nature, yet it comes back. So one of the manifestations that is fairly
consistent is moving back to a sense of unity or a sense of wholeness or
coherence – connection with that which is greater than oneself. So people
who are moving towards healing are people who are usually shifting from
lower power to higher power choices.

F. Subject M

Happenings around death can be so transforming so quickly. I think we

are receptive to healing so much more at that time. The consciousness is
different somehow. Very dramatic things can happen at that point and they
probably happen frequently. There is very high frequency going on then.
That is when changes can occur rapidly and instantly…..when somebody

115
 is really seriously ill, spiritual connection seems to take place. Now some
people want to talk about death, others do not.

G. Subject A

In substance abuse early recovery is characterized by shifting in the

energy field. ‘Yes, I am – no I’m not – Yes, I’m better, no I’m not’. There
is ambiguity in the field until they get to the point that they just realize, ‘I
can’t keep shifting back and forth like this – I have to continue to fine tune
my program’. This changes the direction of the flow of energy in the field
and the manifestations will change. Many times they will move from the
struggle of dealing with the specific intent to abstain from substance abuse
into experiencing serenity in their recovery process. [move from specific
intent to intentionality in seeking wholeness] Though each person
describes it differently, it seems to be this all encompassing peace, which
may reflect their transformational stage. They describe their serenity as
peacefulness and almost assurance on some level that they would never
have to deal with alcoholism or addiction any more but they would have to
deal with living on a day-to-day basis. As the changes in their flow
become more entrained in the direction they choose to go, they feel calm
and empowered that they can make the right choices as they’ve been able
to live through a very difficult time. Part of the healing environment is to
give the information and once the directionality has changed; there is
calmness about the field. There is no longer dissonance as there once was.
Flow is calmer and the energy more organized.

IV. Exhibits observable and intuitively understood human field pattern changes

A. Subject D

I think the difference between curing and healing is an important one. I

think of curing as a culminating kind of an event and it is a yes or no. I
think of healing as an ongoing process that is endless because it is almost
one and the same with the life process. So what you have are moments of
healing, moments of right relationship, moments when something comes
together in a new way that gives the system more energy or more
wholeness in that moment. Then the system is changed from that point on
and goes on.
B. Subject W

They also have to recognize that the process is happening. There are
periods when it is unconscious and they are not aware that it is happening
and then there is an ‘Ah ha!’ kind of thing – the recognition may be there
but they may have difficulty articulating it. You can’t just mouth the

116
 words and make the transformation actual, it is reflected in how people
live and work in their relationships. There seems to be some serenity that
goes with this transition and transformation. Sometimes it’s very hard for
them to explain.

C. Subject B

Healing I see it in whole. It isn’t something I see in parts. I just know it’s
there or it isn’t there. I think it’s a process. Sometimes you can see the
process evolve. You can see the anger in people and then there is less
anger and then the resolution or peace. And I think the process… is so
important and they can feel that presence.

D. Subject D

We may not recognize that healing is happened until months later, for
example. We recognize that we are fundamentally different than we were.
I had this experience myself around a relationship with my father.
Suddenly I realized I wanted to reconnect with him when I was standing in
front of the greeting cards in a drugstore at Easter time. Recognizing; in
fact, that there had been healing happening, completely beyond my
consciousness. I didn’t even realize it. At some level I had already shifted
and that was the beginning of acting on that healing and I actually did send
that card.

E. Subject S

You get a sense of who is really moving toward a healing path because
they are taking action. How do I know that healing is happening? I can
sense it. One of my clients brought his friend so I realized he must have
had a significant experience. So they bring their friends, which is one way
of knowing that you’ve made some kind of positive difference with them.
Also they make changes in their lives. This is how I see the manifestations
of healing. Positive behavior change from their perspective.

F. Subject D

Healing may not manifest itself at a physical level. A good example of this
is with people who are dying. So often nurses that are experienced learn to
recognize that when someone looks like they are dying and all of a sudden
wakes up bright and cheery one morning that this is likely to be the last
‘hurrah’. This is likely the moment that precedes the actual death. People
sometimes rally near the end and I see this as a healing moment. They are
coming into right relationship at some level that is spiritual and emotional

117
 and has given their system so much energy and freedom that the person
actually physically looks like are getting well. But, in fact, then we see the
next day the person dies. There is a healing moment that doesn’t
necessarily correlate at all with the curing of that person.

G. Subject C

Some observable manifestations of healing, I believe, have to do with

emotion and movement, facial appearance and eyes, affect the position of
the body and the voice when a person speaks. Not just what is said, but
how it is said. The rhythm of… speech. What we are talking about is the
whole collection of observables that we put some label on. I think nurses
do help people articulate what they are experiencing. When something has
been inside and doesn’t have words, the nurse can help that person find the
words to express. What happens with that expression is there is an
emotional release. It’s a structure that helps them understand or have some
meaning.

H. Subject C

What we haven’t learned is to see the whole. I think we see it, I’m not sure
we can perceive it all at once so what happens is that I think we notice the
pattern has changed and I think this is a holistic thing. Intuition is big. The
things that we know don’t just come out of the air. There is a perceptual
pattern that is enough that we become aware of it. So appearance of face
and eyes, I think is reflective. I think it’s in the voice and I think that even
in the manner of movement. We perceive the whole and then we try to
understand the whole. In that process we sometimes go to those things that
seem to be making up the whole and try to express them. If you’ve gone
into mutual process as a nurse with this client in previous meetings, then
when this person sees you, there is a way in which your proximity and
his/her seeing you generates an eagerness. What happens is not just in
them but in both of you. The pattern changes are reflected in that
interaction. It’s like what they say and how they say it, both. Maybe more
than that we don’t understand, but it’s noticeable.

I. Subject B

Some of the manifestations of healing and changes depend on the

environment and in the setting. In a hospital setting you can see
manifestations in situations where you notice a relaxation of the muscles
of the body and a regular rhythm of breathing in people who are on bed
rest or who are on a respirator or in severe pain. Expression changes. Also,

118
 the tone of their voice, it’s mostly non-verbal though sometimes they do
say, ‘I do feel so much better’.

J. Subject S

Bonding or setting up a healing environment is not chaotic. People need to

like each other and the client needs to feel comfortable. It’s important to
connect the client with a caregiver who can bond with him or her. Then
identify problems from the client’s perspective. What they think their
problems are and this is how we can help create an expanded awareness.
In the moment I see relief I see a person who feels understood and a
person who feels tremendous relief because what once seemed like an
unsolvable problem just melted. I see the experience of hopelessness
transformed into hope. They don’t fall into the same hole over and over. If
things come up again, they recognize they can use the same process that
we use and know that it will work to bring them some relief from their
hopelessness.

K. Subject S

The manifestations that I see are increased awakenings, connecting with

people, taking action and trying to share the help with others.

L. Subject D

What I notice about healing happening is really in the moment and it’s an
awareness that something has shifted so it’s not necessarily a sensory
input. It’s not necessarily data that’s coming from our 5 senses. It may be
an energetic felt sense. It’s actually felt just in my own body or my own
energy field. I may be sitting with someone and we might be talking and I
get a sudden chill or rush of energy in my body. That is really a clue. I
take that as a sign of healing and I don’t necessarily even know what it is.
I simply listen to what emerges, even from my own body, mind and spirit
at that moment.

M. Subject D

The energy of the whole field of a person and myself, as one field,
something has shifted in that entire field. I think that sometimes it seems
that the most chaotic and disorderly point or shift where it feels like the
system is falling apart. Then in the middle of that you may have this
moment. I see these things as moments of healing.

N. Subject C

119
The pattern of changes that reflect healing is that the nurse begins to help
the client elicit their understanding of what is happening and get some
coherence to it. So it becomes a more coherent experience and it’s
meaningful to them and they understand it as a part of themselves. Then it
becomes an energizing peace.

120
 Relationship Themes

I. Right relationship with self and meaningful others

A. Subject M

The mutuality of somebody using their energy in an intentional way, the

way that you were doing it, provides the boost that someone might need.
Especially if the two people in mutual process have their intentions
aligned. I think that is so important since my intentionality needs to be in
touch with yours or whatever. If we have mutually united our intentions, it
is much more powerful. It’s very powerful and all of that is happening, but
especially if the person you are doing it with is at the same time
connected.

B. Subject C

We’ve been talking a lot about the integrality of the nurse and the patient
and the environment and the integrality of the relationships among those.
To me healacy is that elliptical interaction. If that’s the case you are just
looking at the frequency. So there is this interaction, this process of person
and environment and it’s constant and the changes occur constantly,
usually incrementally. So if you come in and your energy level and your
frequency are at a higher rate. You are my nurse and I’m feeling
somewhat debilitated, but I feel totally engaged with you. Then that
mutual process provides me the opportunity to increase my energy
frequency and maybe speed up my experience in some way.

C. Subject M

Sometimes in creating a healing environment, it is helpful to pull back

people who have been role models in the client’s life, to bring people in to
ask them to help. Not with their physical presence but with their pan-
dimensional presence. The client may recall instances that were very
meaningful…this can be an important contribution to healing. I think there
is a generational aspect to relationships and just exploring who has been
meaningful in the client’s life and in the client’s family life is helpful.
Maybe the client hasn’t even known some of these people but they are an
important part of the client’s roots and…being. It may be helpful…to
focus on this and be aware of it in some kind of way.

121
D. Subject A

… substance abusers frequently have broken relationships or have

developed very tense relationships with their families and their friends.
There may have been threats on the part of family members. There may
have been disillusionment of marriages. They may have lost significant
others and they may have lost their jobs and homes. They may have been
threatened, cajoled, or taken to court by key people in their lives. Once
these people have gotten into a program and become well established, it is
the relationships with the people in the program that help change their
flow of energy and create the possibility for them to heal. The energy
begins to calm down; it begins to flow more smoothly…and appear less
chaotic. The relationship with self is the most important impetus for
change and relationships are the bedrock of healing.

E. Subject W

A woman with scleroderma was incredibly ill and dying. She realized that
her relationships with her family were not working. That she was really a
servant to them and to her kids and had been just overly self-sacrificing.
That she needed to change that in order to heal. She did. She told her kids
that she wasn’t going to see them every weekend and she began to set
limits with her adult children. She then related to me [Subject W] and this
made a big impact on her process of healing. Reconciling her relationships
with herself and with her children made it possible for her to begin the
healing process.

F. Subject E

I think the authenticity of the relationship, the being with the person in
ways that they can appreciate the being with is what will create a healing
relationship between the 2 or 3 people or however many there may be.
Healingness of the relationship is really a manifestation of the
relationship. Moving into a right relationship with self enables one to
move into right relationship with others.

G. Subject E

When people don’t feel that they have options or that there are
possibilities, their perception of their field diminishes. It is like, ‘Are you
looking at a point or a wave of energy?’ It’s the perception of the
closeness or the openness of the field that the person is relating to. So I

122
 think that people’s perceptions of themselves are a pattern manifestation
of their relationship with their energy field.

H. Subject D

When there is this notion of right relationship. When some element of the
system comes into new pattern and the pattern is a healing pattern, then
one of the things that goes along with that is there is more energy for the
whole system. Whatever level that right relationship emerged in, more
energy is available for the whole to do the work of that system.…the way I
think about healing is this emergence of right relationship at one or more
levels of the person. There is an increase in order or an increase in energy.

II. Intentional Mutual Process

A. Subject C

Some of the dissonance in the patient’s energy field gets dealt with
because the patient is sharing things with the nurse and the nurse is
interacting with the person in such a way that their process becomes more
mutual. By that I mean they understand and know more about each other.
Then I think what happens is that they are able to sort of move together.
At that point, when it’s mutual, the nurse is moving with the patient and
the patient is moving with the nurse. I think of it like jumping rope.
Remember when you were ready to go in and jump. …you would stand
there and sense and use your hands and often you would sense the rhythm
of that rope. You go in and start jumping. When you are really and truly in
that process with the patient, it’s like you are actually going to jump right
with the rhythm of the rope. When we really have these relationships that
are mutual and we are moving that patient along, what I think happens is
that we are in their rhythm and we sense their rhythm.

B. Subject M

Mutual process magnifies the possibilities of what can happen when

intentionalities are united and that is a lot of what happens in any kind of
therapeutic relationship. We talk about relationships heal no matter what
kind of therapy or healing in any kind of paradigm or any kind of
theoretical perspective. It’s always the mutual process that is so important
in what happens and in change. There is a special type of synchrony that
in happening in health patterning and the healing process work. The
mutual process when people are willingly committed to it brings about
healing. If someone is freely and you are freely committed to a certain
intention there is a lot of healing energy attached to that.

123
C. Subject S

It is through mutual process these people are here to help us heal as much
as we are here to help them heal. This is how the world works. I know I’m
learning from a client when I find myself writing something down because
it is really interesting and cool and I want to think about it later. Bonding
is happening because the mutual process is in action.

D. Subject D

It is important in the relationship that the client defines the changes that
needs to take place and the terms of the healing process.

E. Subject E

So if my ego is tied to the outcome or to my solution, then I really am not

participating fully in this mutual process between us. We partner in
creating a relationship and my job is to bring resources into the
relationship that can be useful to the person and to open up possibilities
for him/her and expand…consciousness to those possibilities.

F. Subject D

There has to be a willingness to allow the system to find it’s own way and
a trust that if you simply stay out of the way and keep it basically safe for
people, not allow it to become disruptive, the system will do that. Groups
will; in fact, come to a new place but if you pull the power back, they will
never take it again. That is how I experienced the healing process in a
group. When you actually allow it and the group comes through that, the
healing is phenomenal. There is order, a decrease in the chaos, and there is
way more energy. The group becomes activated to do something,
whatever it was trying to do. More freedom in creativity comes through.
People having what we might term as spiritual awakenings are good
examples of healing.

G. Subject S

The relationship is important and the environment is an atmosphere and

the atmosphere has to include a group of people that like the clients they
are taking care of. We don’t fix clients in the program I work in. They
might not know who Martha Rogers is, but they have to be thinking that
everything is purposeful and there is no such thing as a coincidence. Those
kinds of thoughts are part of our process.

124
H. Subject D

If a nurse sits there in her position of judging and knowing and thinking
she knows the client and thinks the client needs to do what she thinks the
client needs to do, that can kill the healing process. It’s that very thinking
that prevents us from having authentic relationships.

I. Subject D

If I’m in a situation with two or more people and the process is flowing
and chaos is integrated into the process, I can sometimes feel frightened
and want to pull back control. If that occurs I kill the process.

J. Subject E

The thing that is most important is letting go of the ego.….. my job is to

create an environment and provide the resources for the person to realize
or create his/her own solutions. You have to let go of controlling the
situation.

K. Subject D

A healing relationship with somebody is so much about holding a space, a

possibility, or helping create an environment where the person feels really
safe not to know. The patient and provider can be comfortable in the
ambiguity of the healing relationship. It’s critical because it’s really in our
profound need to know and to be able to control that we actually barricade
the free flow of energy. We block energy as soon as we think we know.
The practitioner has to become so comfortable with the ambiguity that the
patient can be safe in the ambiguity. Because if that practitioner is not
comfortable with ambiguity, then the client will not be either. Under those
circumstances practitioners tend to push the client in a direction. The
practitioner will ask a question and that will bring the client up into their
head more and more looking for an answer that is; in fact, not in their head
but it is in the living of the process.

L. Subject S

It is a mutual process as these people are here to help us heal as much as

we are here to help them heal. I know I’m learning from a client when I
find myself writing something down because it is really interesting and
cool and I want to think about it later. I also am aware that bonding is
happening because the mutual process is in action. Clients are impressed
that I’m writing down what they have taught me and they are more open to

125
 what I’m saying. I sometimes learn simple things like how to store
potatoes so they don’t rot. When you are learning from clients, open the
channels so if you have any wisdom to share with them, they can hear it.

M. Subject D

The nurse must trust that there is an inherent mutual process. You simply
create the space and support that there is wisdom in that system that will
guide the process and guide the person toward healing. In groups it’s
much more challenging because the group can fall apart pretty quickly.
My experience is that just in the moment where a group reaches the point
of chaos, which in a healing model can be the moment just before a
breakthrough to healing; the nurse is tempted to take control because
he/she thinks the group is falling apart. If the nurse pulls back control in
an attempt to save the group, it will kill the whole process of movement
toward healing.

N. Subject S

The relationship is important in terms of really truly valuing patients and

making an attempt to understand them and then trying to be helpful from
their perspective. All of this happens within a healing environment. ….
Bonding requires that people like each other. Nurses have to be willing to
learn from the patients because it is the ‘taking something new’ in from
the patients that opens up the channel for patients to take something in
from us as nurses.… It’s important that we pay attention to what we can
learn from our patients. When patients see we value what they have to
offer us, they open up to us in a new way. We also create a different kind
of balance in the relationship with this type of exchange. These
relationships are mutual and mutually healing.

III. Energetic influences from collective relational experiences affect present

relationships

A. Subject E

The patient and nurse each have relationships that impact the way that
they relate to each other. Dissonance in nurse’s circle of professional
relationships makes it for the nurse difficult to develop a therapeutic
relationship with the patient.

126
B. Subject M

Relationships with everyone in one’s life play an important part in the

healing process. It’s really important to help people with their
relationships with others. Healing does not take place in a vacuum; the
whole environment needs to be a healing environment. If they are having
marital issues, or issues with their children or issues within any important
relationships, if there are kinks in them, it really helps if the clients can
smooth these out - which isn’t easy for any of us. So when you are trying
to create a healing environment…you have to at least try to facilitate their
reconciling the most important relationships in that person’s life.

C. Subject E

There is the immediate relationship that is going on with the person that
I’m in relationship with and then there is the field that is beyond us but
still encompassing us directly. Then there is another field beyond that,
which is including the people that are in our lives. So even though we are
in an immediate expression of one energetic relationship, we’re influenced
by all those other energetic relationships. In creating a healing
environment, I must be conscious of the immediate relationship or
interaction but also aware of other influencing energetic patterns that
contribute to that.

D. Subject E

Relationship Centered Care and the context of that have an effect on the
immediate relationship. If you are in a clinical environment where the
relationship among the team and the healers [physicians, nurses, etc.] is a
therapeutic one, then it has a positive impact on your relationship with
your patient. It is difficult to create a healing relationship with a patient
when there is dissonance in those kinds of environments…it offers much
bigger challenges because there is a drain in the field.

E. Subject V

We need to pay attention to the nurses so they have the energy to give to
the patients, then the patient’s energy can improve. It is essential. Nursing
is a relational practice so the quality of those relationships is key. The nice
thing about working as staff on a unit is that nurses have their own
uniqueness, too. So some patients may respond better to one nurse than to
another.

127
F. Subject W

A guy I’m working right now is brilliant, funny and delightful but he has
no relationships and he is lonesome and suffers from depression. Our
therapeutic goal is to create intimacy in his life. Intimacy is an important
aspect of having a healthy, whole life. Creating a relationship may be the
healing goal.

G. Subject M

You need to look at what I’ve said about the different groups the person is
in their lives and what those environments are like and what is it in those
environments that might need healing that can be concentrated on?
Sometimes it requires bringing other people in for one or more sessions to
work on the group pattern manifestations more directly. That is if the
person agrees to that and wants to do it. Very often I find that this is the
most effective way to promote healing but it is conscious awareness of
what is manifesting in any particular environment and is it or is it not
contributing to healing? You can’t just say that something is X in that
environment and you have to get rid of it because you can’t take a piece
out of the whole and the environment is a whole. Different environments
depending on which group field or individual field we are looking at and
what the environment looks like – each group manifests differently. For
example, if you look at someone’s nuclear family group and what that
manifestation was like for the client, it might be different than the
manifestation from someone’s current family. What is manifesting in that
environment or the work environment or the health environment or
whatever is going on is highly relevant to the healing process.

128
 Condition Themes

I. Client Centered Design, enhancement to healing---Meaningful Relationship,

essential to healing

A. Subject D

The most important part of the patient’s environment is his/her

relationship with the practice nurse. Whether the walls are painted pink or
chartreuse or black, in the moments when the patient is suffering, the
artistry of the human connection is indeed the most profoundly important
one. So I think the design of the physical environment can be important,
but it is not paramount. When …offered without offering a healing
relationship, they simply become trivial. When they are used with other
support they become much more powerful. Certainly all of us feel better in
beautiful surroundings.

B. Subject C

I think aesthetic factors and physical environment are important but they
are not as important as the human component of the environment. So I
believe we do not interact with all of our environment but the human
interaction-the humans in the environment have a much greater impact.

C. Subject M

In response to the question as to whether the physical environment and

aesthetic factors are important, I would have to say ‘yes’ and then I would
have to say ‘no’. They are not the major factors. I think that aesthetic
factors do contribute as everything contributes. Colors have a frequency.
You can walk into a room and immediately feel the energy. All these
things do contribute to the healing environment. I think the main thing that
comes through is the feeling that comes from me [the nurse] to them.
Another factor, the attitude of the people who provide care is critical.

D. Subject W

I think an attractive, well-designed physical environment is a nice thing to

have and there are certainly environments that are noisy, too brightly lit
and where people are interrupting all the time. This certainly impedes the
process of healing. One needs an environment where you can create an
intimate relationship to facilitate the healing process but I also think that
people can create their own energetic environment and that this energetic

129
 environment can supersede what is going on around them. I think about
Katrina and I think about seeing people in trailers, in the lunch room, and
in crowded clinics. Now granted those were not ideal places to try to
create a healing space but I think you can do it with your intention and do
it with your energy. You do it through relationships.

E. Subject E

I think that a physical environment can contribute to healing. I think that

physical conditions can be patterned in such a way to promote healing
potential. I think that healing does and can occur regardless of the physical
environment. I think if there is a relationship in which one is supporting
another who is seeking to heal that the physical environment is like a
myth. It does not matter. I keep thinking about Katrina and the people who
survived and thrived through that process and the incredible moments of
healing that occurred in that environment. The healing actually occurred
through relationships. The dominant condition is the healing relationship

F. Subject C

All the rooms are private now, or at least most of them are. So in a way it
can seem wonderful, but on the other hand, we’ve isolated everybody. So
if human interaction is critical to healing, then we may have put something
there that isn’t always useful. In a lot of cases if a person’s door is closed
and they don’t call on the light very much, they are really in their room a
long time by themselves – only with their television.

G. Subject B

You can’t say: Ok, this is the kind of prescribed environment we will have
because different things in the environment mean different things to
different patients. One time there was a picture on the wall and it
happened to be a picture that the patient asked me to take away as she said
it frightened her half to death. Some things make people feel good. Other
things make them feel uncomfortable. People have highly individualized
perspectives. As nurses we must recognize that everything has to be
evaluated in terms of the individual. You can’t do it in any other way.

H. Subject C

If we are talking about a patient in the hospital, we’re talking about

somebody who we’ve extracted from their pattern and plucked them down
into a different pattern. They are trying to deal with that so the way they
deal with it is to try to form a pattern in the hospital. This frequently

130
 comes across as ‘I like my bed table right over there’. That’s trying to
pattern their own environment and I encourage people not to get irritated
with clients who do that. Something does happen after 2 or 3 days. Even if
you travel and stay in a motel or hotel or something, the first day is very
different than the 2nd and 3rd days in terms of how you feel when you
come in. I think that’s about becoming patterned to that environment.

I. Subject C

I believe in change in the environment. Changing pictures or doing

different things within the room. It’s important to let people have pictures
of their families when they are in the hospital. I also think those bulletin
boards that allow you to put up useful information help to pattern the
environment in a positive way.

J. Subject W

There are all types of things that we can do to make an environment more
pleasant for patients. Provide softer colors, provide music, provide views
through windows, and some hospitals even have healing gardens.

K. Subject V

It’s important that we keep the surroundings orderly and we create calm.
It’s about the way the energy resonates. Nurses since Nightingale have
been committed to creating order. Creating order and also creating some
kind of attractive environment helps to create a positive energy.

L. Subject S

We try to keep our residential area nice because most of the clients are not
used to nice. Many of our clients are homeless and to be able to stay in a
residential environment while they are recovering from substance abuse is
a very unusual and positive experience. It’s very important to have clean
and new things. I go around picking up clutter. Clutter and junk gather bad
energy.

II. Healthy Nursing Culture Facilitates a Healing Environment

A. Subject D

Alleviating the nursing shortage involves caring and healing within the
health care system. It’s important to create an environment for nursing. I
call this ‘habitats for healing’. We really need to think about nurses not as

131
 commodities that can be bought and sold but as an endangered species. If
you use an ecological model even the questions you ask are different.
When you are dealing with an endangered species, you don’t try to get
more [of the species] into a toxic environment, you clean up the
environment first. You make sure that you create a place where when you
bring the endangered species, they can survive.….What will be good for
healing is what will be good for nurses because the nurses in the
institution are; in fact, what is needed for healing. You have to create
environments where nurses can nurse. One way to do this is to look at the
criteria for Magnet Hospitals. My bias is that you cannot have healing
unless the healing relationship is mutual and healing moments are mutual.
You cannot have an environment that supports healing for patients if it
doesn’t support the healing …for the nurse.

B. Subject B

If you have a place that is really focused on creating a healing

environment, they will [foster] not only the healing for the patient but also
healing for the staff. I think that philosophy of a facility is important and I
think that nurses can support each other much more than they do. If the
facility fosters innovative healing modalities and focuses on
compassionate care that filters down through the process with all
employees.

C. Subject V

I think a huge factor that supports nurses in actively participating with

patient healing is whether that institution values nursing as nursing. There
are all sorts of ways that you can look at nursing. When we finally don’t
need ‘Nurses’ Week’ anymore, then I will know that we are actually a
profession that is valued by society.…Treat nurses horribly for a whole
year and then have a week for nurse celebrations.

III. Philosophically grounded, open and in search of meaning

A. Subject B

Having a view of Rogers Science is probably what opened the world to me

in terms of the infinite potential, and the processing of human and
environmental energy fields. The mutual process between human and
environmental energy fields may be the fertile field for healing to take
place. Patterning the environment to promote healing is a therapeutic
modality that I often use.

132
B. Subject V

Ideological or philosophical perspectives – I do think that if the

atmosphere is constructed to open possibilities, if the philosophy is one of
openness and not one of ‘Oh, you are my problem today’, how do I
increase the likelihood that the best possible outcome can happen? That is
a philosophical framework. What is the underlying way in which healing
works? If we think about it in terms of unitary energy and possibilities,
then exciting things can happen and we transcend the problem focus.

C. Subject S

Philosophical model that I use in my residential program is one that I talk

to the clients about. I tell them about it because I want them to know
where I’m coming from and I tell them they don’t have to buy into it f
they don’t want to. I tell them about our philosophy because they need to
know where I’m coming from if they want to understand me. For
example: If they have a problem, I might say, ‘This is a great opportunity
for healing’ as opposed to trying to solve the problem for them. This
philosophy is a way of thinking, living and breathing. It’s the philosophy
that creates the atmosphere.

D. Subject C

I think Rogers has probably affected my art – the art of nursing the most.
It has to do with the relationship…the nurse patient relationship. With
Rogers; of course, if you are talking about the nurse, patients and
environment, it is an environment interaction. Art is the best way to
describe that.

E. Subject C

Yes, I do think that ideological and philosophical perspectives play a role

in bringing about healing and mostly it will be the perspective of that
nurse. I guess it would be both in the patient and in the nurse. Yes, I
believe that it is important that patients trust nurses. They do, by the way.

F. Subject D

Part of my ideology is to recognize that you don’t know what is happening

and your job is to just simply support whatever is happening – not to
manage it.….I think we are profoundly influenced by our ideology and
what we think is going on. We all have an ideology. We simply don’t take
the time very often to question what it is. So it’s often the hidden director,

133
 the behind-the-scenes director, directing the show. One of our
responsibilities then; if we really want to facilitate healing, is to take the
unconscious, the hidden directors, and get them out front and center so
that we really recognize what our philosophy is – what we believe and
also what its limitations are. One question is: When are our ideologies
getting between ourselves and our patients?

G. Subject M

Acceptance is a great gift that people have. You know when people have
that awareness that they are human and what that means. What it means to
be human. When people embrace that in its fullest, I think they are able to
bring about changes, healing and otherwise. Recognizing our own
humanity is a perspective that was empowering in terms of making
changes. Power is from within.…..I think one thing that is very important
is people who have openness to various ideas. I think an acceptance of
different points of view as legitimate beyond their own. …people who
believe that they don’t have to be perfect...don’t have to defend;
necessarily, because they recognize that we are all imperfect – we all
make mistakes.

H. Subject W

Healing is finding meaning in your experience. I think any philosophical

or religious or spiritual background – anything that helps a person make
meaning of an experience is essential. People who have had patients who
have been through horrible trauma, if they can figure a way to say, ‘I’ve
learned from this – I’ve had to change certain things in my life because of
this’ – then healing is possible.

I. Subject W

A woman who had many problems with her sister was able to come closer
to her and reconcile her relationship when the sister had breast cancer.
Both of them found meaning in that. It just came out spontaneously and to
me that is really healing. When people need to change and they find a
philosophy that can help them change, they make a conscious decision to
change within that philosophical perspective. Sometimes energy will not
resonate with them around a certain ideology and at other times they will
find something that really resonates with them. If it resonates for them
from a personal standpoint, they begin to set up relationships with the
philosophy and with other people who ascribe to this same philosophy.
This is an important step towards healing.

134
J. Subject S

I have noticed that clients, who get heavily into religion and don’t work on
their own shadow, don’t stay clean long. My long-term successful clients
who stay clean have really bought into or are compatible with our
program’s philosophy: God is in charge.

K. Subject A

I think that in any instance when people have made a change or are
looking for information on what to do to change….they have to pick
something that will resonate with them…if it resonates with them from a
personal standpoint, they begin to set up relationships with the philosophy
and with other people who ascribe to that same philosophy.

135
 Practice Themes

I. Theory Based Practice

A. Subject C

But what makes it nursing in my view, is that I have a knowledge base

about unitary human beings that is always in the context of their
environment and I look at them as energy fields. There can be a single
energy field in the context of their environment or they can be different
kinds of group with their energy field of their family of origin and their
family now or their work groups. Whatever that environment is like and
what is now manifesting in all of these different environments. Then my
job is to try to know pattern manifestations by looking at their
experiences, their perceptions, and all of this so that we can come to the
next phase of the process, which is voluntary mutual patterning that we are
doing together. But the basic thing of nursing to me is this knowledge base
of understanding human beings in the context of their environment.

B. Subject M

I am continuously using my Rogerian practice methodology, which is the

pattern manifestations knowing and that incorporates Richard Cowling’s
work pattern appreciation. And then the second part is voluntary mutual
patterning that we do together and to me that is what nursing is. It’s like
really understanding the person, the whole person in the context of his/her
environment. The knowledge that we have in nursing, about the whole
person and their mutual process in their environment is what I’m always
basically trying to get at.

II. Nurse as healing environment

A. Subject E

Most of the times we think of the environment as being a physical

construct around us and my perspective is that I am the person’s
environment. That human environment relationship is the thing that we are
working with and I can influence myself as part of that relationship and
when I make changes in myself, the relationship changes. And then the
person is somehow, through some universal flow, able to change
themselves.

136
B. Subject B

The fact is that when I do my nursing, it’s quiet and with focus and that
client is the only person in the world who is there at that moment for me to
focus on. That mutual process is taking place then and now. I don’t think
about the hospital setting, I only think about the client and the families. If
you are looking at the client from a family point of view - as a unit. I think
that is most important and they know that I’m there for them because I
AM there for them.

C. Subject D

An important healing practice for nursing is mindfulness and a willingness

of the nurse to see himself or herself as the healer. It’s first and foremost
the ‘self’ as healer – the bringing the whole self into this relationship so
it’s really the caring – being fully present in the caring.

D. Subject V

I believe knowing and presence are important in bringing about changes

that are manifestations of healing. In a nursing situation there is usually
physicality involved. It’s getting close enough to the patient so that you
are giving them your undivided attention. Attention is part of this – you
are actually focusing your attention on the patient’s situation. Now that
may appear simple but I guarantee you it doesn’t happen all the time.

E. Subject V

It is interesting that even in a short encounter I can have an existential

moment with a client. When I was working in a pre-surgical assessment
setting, we were trying to convey to our clients that this is the beginning of
our relationship with you. This is how we are with you here. We are
available to you and we want to know your story, and we want to know
what brought you here. What your stresses and worries are because we are
going to be here for you and here is what is going to be happening to you
next. That had had a sense of trajectory to it as well, even though I
probably wouldn’t be seeing them again. I was helping establish nursing
relationships in the future.

F Subject B

I recall working with a little boy and his family. On one encounter when I
saw him he was nine years old but he was two when he first presented
with a brain hemorrhage. His family, of course, was very concerned but he

137
 did well. He did develop a residual deficit of right-sided weakness. But
you know his mom called me the other day and said, ‘I want to just tell
you how much I appreciate what you’ve done through the years’. I
remember when you said to me, ‘Enjoy him every day and live each day –
think about what you can do that day and pattern the environment so that
you are going to have him to be able to do the things that he CAN do –
focus on the things he can’.

G. Subject E

I see Therapeutic Touch as extremely intimate in working with people

because I’m intentionally and they are intentionally allowing me to share
with them our energy field. To know them in a way that other people have
not consciously known them.

H. Subject D

I would say the most important nursing practice is the awareness of the
self as an energy field and then centering oneself – that is bringing in the
quality of high energy into a centered and calm place. Then really being
willing to engage with the patient at that level. So that is a key nursing
practice to use the self, then in the moment what needs to happen emerges.
Proximity is not the same as presence. We can get into intentionality here
because let’s say there is a nurse who is interacting with a patient and
another person could enter the room and go over and check the IV and
leave the room. All that has occurred is we might have observed the other
person coming into the room and do some task and leave. Our process is
different from that. What I’m saying is proximity is not the same as
presence.

I. Subject W

To be a healing presence for another one must recognize their own need
for healing. I would add here that they need to accept their own need for
healing and then recognize they have an individualistic, unique experience
of that.

J. Subject A

People frequently respond to wounded healers and that is a part of their

healing process. Our perception of our field is there are boundaries and
some people’s boundaries are more tightly knit than others.

138
 K. Subject W

Nurses need a lot of help to accept who they are. If nurses are healthy
enough themselves, they will be able to be in human relationship with
other people. So many nurses are totally drained. Many come from
alcoholic families or families where they were care givers from the time
they were little kids and they don’t know how to ask for help. They don’t
know how to look at themselves and admit they have limitations. I think
the single most important thing is that nurses learn about themselves and
are open to help.

L. Subject D

We have to have environments that are sustaining nurses in a healing and

healthy way so that nurses who are engaging patients in a manner intended
to heal are aware that they are people who are, in fact, also healing. That
in the moment of healing and caring this is happening for both and it’s
always that way. When healing happens, it is always mutual and
simultaneous. It may be at different levels for each of these people. What
is happening with the patient is not what is happening with me, precisely
but in the moment we are both healed. Something shifts for both of us.
Those are the times that we leave work deeply satisfied. There is always
mutuality when this happens. We walk lighter, and we sleep better in the
course of our work when we’ve experienced healing with someone.

III. Appraisal and intentional mutual patterning

A. Subject M

When someone comes to me, I ask them what they want. I want to know
what they want and then my job, as I see it, it is to help them make those
changes, if possible. I don’t usually question whether the changes are or
aren’t possible because I believe in miracles. We figure out approaches we
can use. Your approach is to work with a person in defining their own
goals or their own steps because health patterning is helping people make
the changes they want to make.

B. Subject C

Actually it’s the art of recognizing what this person needs and bringing to
that process what we have to offer as a nurse. It facilitates their healing but
the healing belongs to them. It means recognizing and getting to know this
person enough that you have an idea of what will facilitate their healing.

139
C. Subject B

You have to also look at them in terms of how do they perceive what is
happening to them. They are all frightened. So I think it’s very interesting
that on the telephone since I’ve done this for so many years, I’ve acquired
the ability to do a pattern appraisal, even though I can’t see the person. By
the tone of voice and just by the things being said, I can usually phase into
another question or another process that is going to explore more about
who the person is and what is going on with him/her.

D. Subject B

When I first go into a room I must say I look at pattern manifestations of

the environment. They do tell a great deal. Are there flowers? Are there
bright colors in the room? Look at the things that are personal and reflect
the personality of the individual. What does the client look like? What are
his/her facial expressions – body language? How do they move? What is
their speech pattern like? Who is with them? What is the nature of the
mutual process between the client and the people who are there? Are they
having a happy conversation or are they having an argumentative
conversation or are they worried? I do not view the human and
environmental field in particular but can identify the dominant resonating
pattern of their mutual process. There are lot things you can see in just a
moment when you walk in and observe the whole picture and you act
upon it.

E. Subject B

There was a woman in her 70’s who was in the early stage of post
operative recovery from back surgery. She had specific orders related to
position and activity. Only lying and standing were permitted. She was
frail and her body mechanics were severely compromised. The nurses
were concerned that she was at a high risk for falling and had put the side
rails up. When I entered the room, I saw the frightened look on her face as
she was attempting to climb over the bed rail. I put the rail down and
pulled up a chair right next to the bed. I took her hand and said, I’m going
to be your nurse for the night. My name is Subject B and I am here to help
you. I sat there for a moment and looked at the tattoo number on her arm
and immediately I knew what was wrong. I touched the tattoo and I ran
my fingers over it and I said, ‘Is this what’s bothering you?’ She started to
cry and said, ‘Yes, yes, yes. I feel like I’m again in Auzwitch. I remember
when I arrived there. I saw Eichman send my mother, father and sister to
the left. That was their death sentence. He sent me to the right and I went
to a concentration camp. I could sense that the relative past was right there

140
 with her in the relative present. To her, the constraints and the raised bed
rails represented the wire fence at Auzwitch. I felt that in her mind she
could see that concentration camp and she could feel the loneliness, the
pain and the suffering associated with her experience there. Her resonating
pattern manifested feeling of helplessness and vulnerability. I said, ‘I’m
gong to leave the rails down, but I’m going to show you how you can get
up and get down, so you are safe here. She said, ‘I can’t sleep at night –
would you just sit in that chair? Don’t do anything but just sit in that chair
where I can see you until I fall asleep. When my evening shift was over, I
sat in the chair so she could see me. I could see the benefit of my
therapeutic presence as she fell asleep with a contented look on her face.

F. Subject V

It’s more of a special relationship in the world that matters, I think. If I

determine that the patient may be getting in a panic situation, you can
bring them back from that spiral by exerting more control. I need to
become their world and the only thing they are aware of at the time is just
me. Using the force of my energy with them, I think I can pull them back.
So, it is the power of the connection with you that perhaps get them
through? They can trust. They can know that I’m not leaving them. That
I’m observing them. That I’m breathing with them. That I’m not going to
let them get into trouble.

G. Subject V

There are times when a patient is in a panic situation. I’m thinking about a
situation like weaning a patient from mechanical ventilation. I find that
what I will do in responding to their sense of panic is to get my face really
close to their face so that I become the only world they see. That I can
look at them and say, ‘We’re here, I’m here and all you have to do is
breathe’. Really get their attention by being really close to them and by
making sure they understand that I’m really there. You can’t send them
that message by standing across the room.

H. Subject E

When I see people who are lacking information or they have a knowledge
deficit, or they have been seeing themselves in a particular way that begins
to interfere with their satisfaction with life, primarily when I’m working
with somebody like that, I’m either focusing on working with them
through a counseling process of becoming more aware of themselves and
options and alternatives to problem solving. From an educational

141
 perspective of what resources are available to them and how they can
access those resources.

I. Subject C

We practice within the context of three variables and those variables are
respect, responsibility and empathy. So that the concept of responsibility is
something I believe we kind of monitor as we interact so that is part of our
art. The other thing is that respect for the patient’s right so that we have to
find a balance between how much they do for themselves and how much
responsibility they can have and their right to make choices and do the
things they would do. I think empathy is how we do that in relationship.
So those three variables are related. The way we practice this continuously
knowing through empathy and; to me, that then is an artistic process.

J. Subject M

Ok, I’m aware of this. I see the X, Y, Z manifesting and I have to look
now and see what kind of choices need to be made that I would choose to
make as the client and helping the client doing it together. I have to see
what is getting in the way because that is where the freedom comes in.
That is the major blockage, usually. How am I involving myself right at
the moment in creating changes? Well, maybe I am not involving myself
in a way that is getting me any where at all and might be making things
worse. So I try to look at all four dimensions of power: awareness,
choices, freedom to act intentionally and involvement in creating change.
When you do that then you really have a good assessment of knowing the
power that is operating there and what needs to be done to change it.
Sometimes it just helps to point out very directly and very specifically
things for the client and then it’s up to the client to choose.

K. Subject E

If I think there is a single thing that is going to make a difference to this

person and put all my energy into that one tool, I close myself off from
information coming from that person about what is really going on with
them.

L. Subject V

The nurses’ role is to be present with the patient so there is a ‘tune in’ with
the patient and there is a connection that is meaningful to the patient so the
patient feels safe and the patient feels that they have someone caring for
them and I mean that in the full sense of the word. Then the nurse is going

142
 to be using his or her expertise in pointing out the possibilities for healing
within this situation. That it’s the patient’s role to claim those possibilities
with the support of the nurse.

M. Subject V

So it’s focused attention and it’s receiving the impressions of the patient
and getting a sense of what are the possibilities, what are the barriers,
where do we need to go in this situation? I know things about getting
through surgery that this patient doesn’t know so I bring fully my
knowledge about pattern, trajectory, and directionality to this moment and
I see how this patient lines up in that realm of possibilities and then decide
where we should go.

N. Subject V

Knowing the patient is critical, nurses have to know what the problems are
and know what to watch for and also how to create safety. I think trust and
safety are essential. It’s not about machinery-it’s about being known.
What are the likely things that can go wrong here? Who is their family?
Where do they come from? Where are they going to go next? Stuff like
that makes a difference because it’s all about trajectory and directionality.
It is essential that the patient be known. We must have access to
understanding the wholeness of the person. In today’s hospital settings,
frequently nobody knows these patients. No one even knows what the
patient looks like. The patient needs to be known. We need to know who
they are. We know the physiological data but we also need to know if he
looks down today as compared to yesterday. If a nurse is truly paying
attention to who that person is as a whole person, that little piece of data
planted in the mind of the oncoming nurse will alert her to watch that
patient a little differently.

O. Subject V

I also think as a nurse I had damn well better know my stuff! Evidential
or there may be the need for somebody to really recognize the change in
pattern, which indicates they are going septic or they are going into
cardiac shock. We have to be able to assess and pick up the changes early
and taking action at an appropriate time. I’m all for nurses knowing that
stuff as life depends on it.

143
P. Subject S

We must be able to identify problems from the patient’s perspective. Not

what I think their problem is but what they think their problems are. Then
we have to be helpful with that problem. Then we can do exercises to help
them realize through expanded awareness some of the things they can
accomplish in a broader sense.

Q. Subject V

Directionality, size of the world, knowing the person, entering the

person’s world, finding the touch points, finding those points where I can
make a connection. Sometimes it may be simply by my being in that role.
I’m here to be your nurse and you don’t need to know anything else. I’m
real interested but I won’t force myself upon you.

R. Subject V

I think that clients are assessing us as much as we are assessing them.

When they assess a nurse who is competent and capable, they are much
more likely to open their life to them. If they see a nurse who is fumbling
around, who is distracted and not really interested in what they are doing,
talking more to the staff than to them, why should they open their life to
that person? They won’t open their life and they will protect themselves
from that person.

S. Subject V

It all starts with the person and where they are in that moment. Their
capacity to look at possibilities and make choices around those
possibilities, which relates to their sense of meaning. How much energy
do they have at that moment? As a nurse I had better be able to enter their
world so that I can understand their energy and their meaning and I can
help them explore that. Once their meaning is clear, the other stuff is
going to sort itself out. It’s understanding their situation in the ‘NOW’,
which makes a difference.

T. Subject B

You do a health patterning…you focus entirely on the patient – those are

the things that you intuitively connect with the patient. You’ve got to deal
with the technical issues, sure you do. But the healing comes from your
presence and your commitment to what you are doing and your
intentionality. Intentionality is the whole thing right there. It’s the intent

144
 and I think it’s one of the most important things. The intentionality or
participating in the healing process and that has always been my
intentionality. Commitment, intentionality, and healing, and caring.

U. Subject E

I’m aware that I have flexible frequencies so depending on who I’m with,
and what the needs are at the time, I can adjust my wave frequencies to be
synchronized with their’s.

V. Subject V

Sometimes you have a one episode encounter with a patient. That

encounter with this patient has no before or middle or end to it. What we
did is get our whole story so their story itself had a beginning. What we
did is get the patient’s whole story. So their story itself had a beginning,
middle, and end, or at least up to the middle. That was my job of trying to
understand what was the pattern of their life. Where are they going in
terms of their safety and capacity because they are facing big surgery in
the future?

W. Subject V

Let’s start with critical care. What I look for is how big is the world that
this person can attend to? If they are totally sedated or under medication
then their world is very small. They really are functioning more on a
physiological level. Let’s pretend the patient is not overly sedated, and
then I can pay attention to how much of the world the patient is paying
attention to. Are they able to get outside themselves and give me good eye
contact? The quality of eye contact makes a big difference to me. Do they
see me as another person or just as something out there that might help
them out of their sense of desperation? I find as people heal or move
through their human process, their awareness of their world expands.

X. Subject B

When I ‘m working with a patient and assessing him/her, I visualize the

things the patient tells me. When they tell me something, I’m there with
them. There is no one else but them. Whatever they are describing to me,
it’s like I’m looking at a movie and can actually see it all. This is
something that I do all the time.

145
IV. The nursing art of designing care

A. Subject C

I think it all has to do with being sensitive. A sensitivity to other human

beings. I think the nurse needs to be the professional person who designs
care. I think that we haven’t talked enough about designing care. We
haven’t really talked about designing the care and the importance in who
designs it and then who does what part of it. We want differentiated
practice, but we’ve made that just centered around skills.

B. Subject C

I think that part of providing healing environment has to do with

recognizing this person and where they are in this whole process of
whatever is going on with them, and who they are, and then designing care
specifically for them. The healing environment is created by the art of
nursing. One of the things that nurses do is try to facilitate that being a
harmonious kind of thing so that they can heal. I believe that we do that
with our art. For me, it has to do with the person’s interactive capacity and
empathy in the heart of it. Empathy seems to be the heart of it.

C. Subject S

If we’re doing that with clients, being totally there when they need us,
taking the time to try and understand what the real problem is, then
moving ourselves into the middle of their space in an attempt to solve it,
we are being helpful and promoting healing. Identifying whether a person
needs coaching because the person really can do it, or that the person
really can’t do it because they don’t have any skill sets, is important. If the
person just needs coaching, I can coach. If the person can’t do it, then I
might do it for him/her. There comes a point where they really have to do
things for themselves, as it is better for their healing process. Our program
is designed around personalized care and what we do is provide
personalized care where I’m taking care of you and modeling how you can
do it yourself. Personalized action is when I coach you and help you take
the steps I know you can take to take care of yourself.

D. Subject B

Sometimes I also do imagery on the phone by asking the client to do an

imagery exercise which sort of helps get them through the day. All I ask is
that they get through that particular day and then the next day, just get
through that day instead of looking too far ahead. You know the relative

146
 future can be very frightening to people when they can envision
themselves in a coma or in a terrible situation. So I find this is very
healing environment…using the telephone conversation to help pattern
their day. We also use humor. When I finally do get to meet them, they
feel like I’m an old friend and I feel the same way about them and their
families.

E. Subject E

I think in any interaction with another person who is seeking to heal

themselves, I bring a whole kit of options, skills and tools. I see those
different tools as a sort of ‘jumping off place’ or ways to make
connections.

F. Subject E

I can use a whole toolbox of modalities. I engage in guided imagery,

visualization, journaling, meditation, mindfulness and continuing up
would be looking at the use of energetics and bio-field therapies, like
Therapeutic Touch.

G. Subject D

It’s using the whole toolbox of nursing practices and discerning which of
those tools to use at the moment out of deep presence with this patient. It’s
really using your whole self and your awareness of the whole self to
discern what is the right action for the patient at the moment. Nursing
practice is selected based on what is happening with the patient or what
the patient is experiencing at that moment and the nurse takes the cues
from that. Again the nurses are responding to where the patient is. So I
would say that another nursing practice that is important is nursing
intuition.

H. Subject M

With one of my patients I would every day have a five-minute solid

meditation over the phone with the intention of the two of us uniting our
intentions and focusing on healing to manifest in whatever way it might
manifest. We didn’t have any attachment to a specific outcome and we
would focus our attention on healing. We did this almost every day for a
year and continued until she died. It was always silent but sometimes I
would say, ‘Let’s do healing from a distance’. We’d do Therapeutic Touch
from a distance or sometimes I would give her a one sentence image
exercise to visualize.

147
I. Subject S

From an individual standpoint the nurse bonds with clients, identifies a

focal concern, gives her care gently, helps them try to improve their well-
being and expands their awareness and teaches them to process. You have
to be able to sense what needs to be done clinically and intuitively and
take the appropriate actions, which vary and are individualized and
personalized to situations in people. You have to be able to take whatever
action in necessary to intervene in a healing crisis. If you handle the crisis
right it can become a healing moment. You have to be able to think on
your feet with a pocket full of tricks that you learn over time to be able to
intervene in a way that will transfer the crisis into a healing moment rather
than to escalate it into a nightmare. Doing this is a lot like improvisation.

J. Subject S

If you are willing to just drop everything an seize the moment and be with
that person, thinking on your feet, and try to identify what possible
intervention out of the 16 billion that are out there that you might be able
to do to help them plan. Like a graveside visit for the next day, or interpret
a picture as they are doodling. As you do this you’ll be able to be witness
to healing happening, which is absolutely awesome.

K. Subject S

I help people try to rise above their problems, to look at the concepts, to
look at the metaphors. Don’t take things too seriously. When you start
seeing them do that and laughing about the metaphors, you start seeing
that there is more peace about them.

L. Subject S

What seems to happen is that the opportunity for really good healing
presents itself and the nurse must recognize the opportunity. It’s usually at
some major crisis point that the client is having. Some huge drama or
some huge problem. I have to step back and say that the key thing for me
is to recognize that moment as a potential healing event or opportunity.
What I have to do then is use my intuition to intervene in a way that the
client feels helped and understood. That’s helping to resolve what seems
to them at the moment a panic or a hopeless situation. I must involve them
in the process so not only am I doing this but I’m helping them
participating in it and also on some level direct it. You have to be willing
to move with your intuition directing you and move into the energy field

148
 of the person – protecting and shielding yourself in this process because
you can’t lose sight of the fact that it is their pain.

M. Subject B

You can suddenly see the wholeness of someone, you can look into their
heart, and you can also feel them. I think you can sometimes resonate with
their feelings and you can connect with what they are experiencing and
understand it. Like the loneliness of the man underneath the covers all day
long, shutting himself off from the world.

N. Subject B

First of all, I think intuition is important. What you say by your intuitive
actions – don’t be afraid as long as you know it’s from the heart, don’t be
afraid to say something to the client that you think may be offensive
because the client will know within a minute whether or not it is from your
hear. If it is not from your heart, you may insult them by what you may
say. If they know it’s from the heart even though it may be wrong or an
out of the ordinary thing to say, they will know it and accept it and will
thank you for it probably.

149
 REFERENCES
Aldridge, D. 2003. The therapeutic effects of music. Healing Intentions and Energy
Medicine eds. W. Jonas and C. Crawford. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of
environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Alligood, M. R. 1986. The relationships of creativity, actualization, and empathy in

unitary human development. Explorations of Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary
Human Beings ed. V. Malinski, 145-160. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Alligood, M. R. 1991. Testing Rogers’s theory of accelerating change. The relationships

among creativity, actualization, and empathy in persons 18-92 years of age.
Western Journal of Nursing Research 13, no. 1: 84-96.

Alligood, M. R. 1992. Empathy: The importance of recognizing two types. Journal of

Psychosocial Nursing 30, no. 3: 14-17.

Alligood, M. R. 2002. A theory of the art of nursing discovered in Rogers’ science of

unitary human beings. International Journal for Human Caring 6, no. 2: 55-60.

Alligood, M. R. and J. Fawcett. 2004. An interpretive study of Martha Rogers’

conception of pattern. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science 12, no.1:
8-13.

Alligood, M. R. and B. A. May. 2000. A nursing theory of personal system empathy:

Interpreting a conceptualization of empathy in Kings Interacting Systems.
Nursing Science Quarterly 13, no.3: 243-247.

Alligood, M. R. and S. L. McGuire. 2000. Perception of time, sleep patterns, and activity
in senior citizens: A test of a Rogerian theory of aging. Visions: The Journal of
Rogerian Nursing Science 8, no. 1: 6-14.

Altimier, L. 2004. Healing environments: For patients and providers. Newborn and Infant
Nursing Reviews 4, no. 2: 89-92.

Andes, M. and M.M Shattell. 2006. An exploration of the meanings of space and place in
acute psychiatric care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 27, no. 6: 699-707.

Barrett, E. A. M 1986. A measure of power as knowing participation in change.

Measurement of Nursing Outcomes, eds. O.L. Strickland and C. F. Waltz, 159-
180. New York, NY: Springer.

150
Barrett, E. A. M 1998. A Rogerian practice methodology for health patterning. Nursing
Science Quarterly 11, no. 4: 136-138.

Barrett, E. A. M. Imagery as doorway to no spacetime zone. Presented at Emerging

patters in a changing world at Society of Rogerian Scholars Conference,
Savannah, GA. 15 November 2003.

Beach, M. C. and T. Inui. 2006. Relationship-centered care: A constructive reframing.

Journal of General Internal Medicine 21, Supp. 1: 3-8.

Beck, C. 1993. Qualitative research: The evaluation of its credibility, fittingness and
auditability. The Western Journal of Nursing Research 15, no. 2: 263-265.

Belanger, T. W. 1996. Leadership in a healing environment. Seminars for Nurse

Managers 4, no.4: 218-225.

Benner, P. 1984. From novice to expert: Excellence and power on clinical nursing
excellence. Menlo Park, CA: Addision-Wesley.

Bohm, D. 1980. Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan
Paul.

Bormann, J. E., T. L. Smith, S. Becker, M. Gershwin, L. Pada, A. H. Grudzinski, and E.

A. Nurmi. 2005. Efficacy of frequent mantram repetition on stress, quality of life,
and spiritual well-being of veterans. Journal of Holistic Nursing 23, no. 4: 395-
414.

Bray, J. 1989. The relationships of creativity, time experience and mystical experience.
PhD dissertation, New York University.

Bultemaier, K 1997. Photo-disclosure: A research methodology for investigating unitary

human beings. Patterns of Rogerian knowing ed. M. Madrid, 63-74. New York,
NY: National league for Nursing Press.

Butcher, H.K. 1993. Kaleidoscoping in life’s turbulence. From Seurat’s art to Rogers’
nursing science. Patterns of nursing theories in practice ed. M. E. Parker, 183-
198. New York, NY: National League for Nursing Press

Butts, J. B. 2001. Outcomes of comfort touch in institutionalized elderly female residents.

Geriatric Nursing 22, no. 4:180-184.

Caine, J. 1991. The effects of music on the selected stress behaviors, weight, caloric and
formula intake, and length of hospital stay on premature and low birth weight
neonates in a newborn intensive care unit. Journal of Music Therapy 28, no. 4:

151
 180-192. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces:
Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of
Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Capra, F. 1982. The turning point. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Carboni, J. T.1992. Instrument development and the measurement of unitary constructs.

Nursing Science Quarterly 5, no. 3: 134-42.

Carboni, J. T.1995. Enfolding health-as-wholeness-and-harmony: A theory of Rogerian

nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly 8, no. 2: 71-78.

Caroselli, C. and E. A. M. Barrett. 1998. A review of the power as knowing participation

in change literature. Nursing Science Quarterly 11, no. 1: 9-16.

Cherkin, D. and K. Sherman. 2004. Conceptualization and evaluation of an optimal

healing environment for chronic low-back pain in primary care. Paper presented
at Toward Optimal Healing Environments in Health Care: Second American
Samueli Symposium, Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of
Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S171-S178.

Chez, Ronald A. and Wayne B. Jonas. 2005. Challenges and opportunities in achieving
healing. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 11, Supp. 1: S3-S4.

Chez, Ronald A. and Wayne B. Jonas. 2005. Developing healing relationships: Foreword
from the organizers. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 11,
Supp. 1: S1-S2.

Cowling, W. R., III. 1986. The relationship of mystical experience, differentiation, and
creativity in college students. Explorations of Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary
Human Beings ed. V. M. Malinski, 131-141. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-
Crofts.

Cowling, W.R., III. 1990. A template for unitary pattern-based nursing practice. Visions
of Roger’s Science-Based Nursing ed. E.A.M. Barrett, 45-65. New York, NY:
National League for Nursing Press.

Cowling, W.R., III. 2001. Unitary appreciative inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science 23,
no. 4: 32-48.

Cowling, W. R., III. and D. Taliaferro. 2004. Emergence of a healing-caring perspective:

Contemporary conceptual and theoretical directions. The Journal of Theory
Construction & Testing 8, no. 2: 54-59.

152
Davidson, A. 2001. Research issues. Nursing Science Quarterly 14, no. 2:101-108.

Dubois, J., T. Baratter, and M. Pratter. 1995. Music improves patient comfort level
during outpatient bronchoscopy. Chest 108, no. 1: 129-130. Schweitzer, M., L.
Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design
that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Duffy, J., L. Hoskins, and R. Seifert. 2007. Dimensions of caring: Psychometric

evaluation of the Caring Assessing Tool. Advances in Nursing Science 30, no. 3:
235-245.

Dykeman, M. and D. Loukissa. 1993. The science of unitary human beings: An

integrative review. Nursing Science Quarterly 6, no. 4: 179-188.

Einstein, A. 1961. Relativity. New York, NY: Crown.

Evans, G., D. L. Wilt, M. R. Alligood, and M. O’Neil. 1998. Empathy: A study of two
types. Issues in mental Health Nursing 19, no. 5: 453-461.

Fawcett, J. 2000. Analysis and evaluation of contemporary nursing knowledge: Nursing

models and theories. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.

Fawcett, J. 2005a. Contemporary nursing knowledge: Nursing models and theories 2nd
ed. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

Fawcett, J. 2005b. Criteria for evaluation of theory. Nursing Science Quarterly 18, no. 2:
131-135.

Fawcett, J. and M. R. Alligood. 2006. SUHB instruments: An overview of research

instruments and clinical tools derived from the science of unitary human beings.
Theoria, Journal of Nursing Theory 15, no. 4: 23-27.

Fellowes, D., K. Barnes, and S. Wilkinson. 2004. Aromatherapy and massage for
symptom relief in patients with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002287. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.
CD002287.pub2.

Fenton, M. V. 1987. Development of the scale of humanistic nursing behaviors. Nursing

Research 36, no. 2: 82-87.

Fenton, M. V. 1997. Healing: The outcome of humanistic care. Reflections on healing: A

central Nursing Construct ed. P. B. Kritek, 56-68. New York, NY: National
League for Nursing Press.

153
Ference, H. M. 1986. The relationship of time, experience, creativity traits,
differentiation, and human field motion. Explorations on Martha Rogers’ Science
of Unitary Human Being ed. V. M. Malinski, 161-171. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-
Century-Crofts.

Finfgeld-Connett, D. 2006. Meta-synthesis of presence in nursing. Journal of Advanced

Nursing 55, no. 6: 708-714

Fitzpatrick. J.J. 1988. Theory based on Rogers’ conceptual model. Journal of

Gerontological Nursing 14, no. 9: 14-16.

Fitzpatrick. J. J. 1989. A life perspective rhythm model. In Conceptual models of

nursing: Analysis and application, 2nd ed. eds. J. J. Fitzpatrick and A. L. Whall,
401-407. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.

Garrard, C. 1995. The effect of therapeutic touch on stress reduction and immune
functions in persons with AIDS. PhD dissertation, University of Alabama at
Birmingham.

Gauthier, D. M. 2002. The meaning of healing near the end of life. Journal of Hospice
and Palliative Nursing 4, no. 4: 220-227.

Gillum, T. L., C. M. Sullivan, and D. I. Bybee. 2006. The importance of spirituality in the
lives of domestic violence survivors. Violence Against Women 12, no. 3: 240-250.

Grumet, G. 1993. Pandemonium in the modern hospital. The New England Journal of
Medicine 328: 433-437. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004.
Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health.
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Guba E. and Y. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Gunther, M. and M. Alligood. 2002. A discipline-specific determination of high quality

nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 38, no. 4:353-359.

Hanley, M. and M. Fenton. 2007. Exploring improvisation in nursing. Journal of Holistic

Nursing 25, no. 2: 126-133.

Hays, T. 2006. Facilitating well-being through music for older people with special needs.
Home Health Care Services Quarterly 25, no. 3/4: 55-73.

Heschong, L. 2003. Windows and classrooms. Fair Oaks, CA: Heschong Mahone Group.
Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of

154
 environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Hill, R. G. S.and E. Hatchett. 2001. Human change and individuation in pivotal life
situations: Development and testing the theory of enlightenment. Visions: The
Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science 9: 6-19.

Howard, J. 1975. Humanization and dehumanization of health dare: A conceptual view.

Humanizing Health Care ed. J. Howard and A. Straus. New York, NY: John
Wiley and Sons.

Hui, P. N., M. Wan, W. K. Chan, and P. M. B. Yung. 2006. An evaluation of two

behavioral rehabilitation programs, Qigong versus progressive relaxation, in
improving the quality of life in cardiac patients. Journal of Alternative and
Complementary Medicine 12, no. 4: 373-378.

Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st
century, 1-8. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Jackson, J. L. 2005. Communication about symptoms in primary care: Impact on patient

outcomes. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 11, Supp. 1: S51-
S56.

Jenner, C. A. 1997. The art of nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum 32, no. 4:5-
11.

Jonas, W. Optimal healing environments: The next natural step. Presented at 10th Annual
Force Health Protection Conference Force Health Protection Through
Collaboration, Louisville, KY, August 9, 2007.

Kaldenberg, D. O. 1999. The influence of having a roommate on patient satisfaction.

Satisfaction Monitor. South Bend, IN: Press Ganey Associates. Schweitzer, M., L.
Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design
that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Kerfoot, K. and T. Neumann. 1992. Creating a healing environment: The nurse

manager’s challenge. Nursing Economics 10, no. 6: 423-5.

King, I. and J. Fawcett. The language of Nursing and Metatheory. Indianapolis, IN:
Sigma Theta Tau International Center Press.

155
Kligler, B. 2004. The role of the optimal healing environment in the care of patients with
diabetes mellitus type II. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10,
Supp. 1: S223-S229.

Knight, W. E. and N. S. Rickard. 2001. Relaxing music prevents stress induced increases
in subjective anxiety, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate in healthy males and
females. Journal of Music Therapy 38, no. 4: 254-272. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin,
and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that
make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10,
Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Koch, T. 1993. Towards fourth generation evaluation: listening to the voices of older
patients: a hermeneutic enquiry. Phd dissertation, The University of Manchester,
UK.

Komarek, A. 2004. Creating a healing environment. Nursing Homes 53, no. 10: 78-81.

Krause, D. 1991. The impact of an individually tailored nursing intervention on human

field patterning in clients who experience dyspenea. Phd dissertation, University
of Miami.

Krieger, D. 1993. Accepting your power to heal: The personal practice of therapeutic
touch. Santa Fe, NM: Bear and Co.

Kreiger, D. 1994. Current issues of science-based practice. Rogers’ scientific art of

nursing practice ed. M. Madrid and E. A. M. Barrett, 37-60. New York, NY:
National League for Nursing Press.

Kristeller, J. L., M. Rhodes, L. D. Cripe, and V. Sheets. 2005. Oncologist assisted

spiritual intervention study (OASIS): Patient acceptability and initial evidence of
effects. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 35, no. 4:329-347.

Kritek P. B. Healing: 1997. Healing: A central construct-reflections on meaning.

Reflections on Healing: A Central Nursing Construct ed. P.B. Kritek, 11-27. New
York, NY: National League for Nursing Press.

Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lafferty, W. 2004. Healing, medical care, and health service organizations. Journal of
Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S141-S146.

156
Laidlaw, T., B. M. Bennett, P. Dwivedi, A. Naito, and J. Gruzelier. 2005. Quality of life
and mood changes in metastatic breast Cancer after training in self-hypnosis or
Johrei: a short report. Contemporary Hypnosis 22, no. 2: 84-93.

Laubmeier, K. K., S. G. Zakowski, and J. P. Bair. 2004. The role of spirituality in the
psychological adjustment to cancer: A test of the transactional model of stress and
coping. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 11, no. 1: 48-55.

Leddy, S. K. 1996. Development and psychometric testing of the Leddy Healthiness

Scale. Research in Nursing and Health 19, no. 5: 431-440.

Leddy,S. K. and J. Fawcett. 1997. Testing the theory of healthiness: Conceptual and
methodological issues. Patterns of Rogerian knowing ed. M. Madrid, 75-86. New
York, NY: National League for Nursing Press.

Lewandowski, W. 2004. Patterning of pain and power with guided imagery. Nursing
Science Quarterly 14, no. 3: 233-241.

Lincoln, Y. S. and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Lorenz, S. 2007. The potential of the patient room to promote healing and well-being in
patients and nurses: An integrative review of the research. Holistic Nursing
Practice 21, no. 5: 263-277.

Malinski V. 1991. Spirituality as integrality: A Rogerian perspective on the path of

healing. Journal of Holistic Nursing 9, no. 1: 54-64.

Malinski, V. 1994. Spirituality: A pattern manifestation of the human/environment

mutual process. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science 2: 12-18.

Malinski, V. 1997. Rogerian health patterning evolving into the 21st century. Nursing
Science Quarterly 10, no. 3: 115-116.

Malloch, K. M. 1997. A context for health and healing: Relationships between staff
perceptions of a healing context and their job satisfaction. PhD dissertation,
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

Malloch, K. M., D. Sluyter, and N. Moore. 2000. Relationship-centered care: Achieving

true value in healthcare. Journal of Nursing Administration 30, no. 7/8: 379-385.

Manning-Walsh, J., E. Wagenfeld-Heintz, A. Asmus, M. Chambers, W. Reed, and J.

Wylie. 2004. Relationship-centered care: The expanding cup model. International
Journal for Human Caring 8, no. 2: 26-31.

157
Marshall, D. A., E. Walizer, and M. N. Vernalis. 2004. Optimal healing environment for
chronic cardiovascular disease. Paper presented at Toward Optimal Healing
Environments in Health Care: Second American Samueli Symposium,
Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of Alternative & Complementary
Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S145-S155.

May, K. 1989. Interview techniques in qualitative research: Concerns and challenges.

Qualitative Nursing Research: A contemporary Dialogue ed. J. Morse, 88-201.
Newbury Park: Sage.

McCanse, R. P. 1995. The McCanse Readiness for Death Instsrument (MRDI) : A

reliable and valid measure for hospice care. Hospice Journal: Physical,
Psychosocial, and Pastoral Care of the Dying 10, no. 1: 15-26.

McKinnergin, M. and J. J. Daubenmire. 1994. The healing process of presence. Journal

of Holistic Nursing 12, no. 1: 65-81.

Meleis, A. I. 1997. Future of nursing Scholarship: Paradigms. Image Journal of Nursing

Scholarship 29, no. 3: 225.

Menegazzi, J., P. Paris, C. Kersteen, B. Flynn, and D. Trautman. 1991. A randomized

controlled trial of the use of music during laceration repair. Annals of Emergency
Medicine 20: 348-350. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing
spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal
of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Miller, W. L. and B. F. Crabtree. 2005. Healing landscapes: Patients, relationships, and

creating optimal healing places. Journal of Alternative and Complementary
Medicine 11, Supp. 1: S42-S49.

Morse, J. M. 1994a. Handbook of qualitative research eds. N. K. Denzin and Y. S.

Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

Morse, J. M. 1994b. Going in “blind.” Qualitative Health Research 4, no. 1: 3-5.

Morse, J. M. 1994c. Qualitative research: Fact or fantasy? Critical Issues in Qualitative

Research Methods ed. J. Morse, 1-8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Moss, V. 1988. Music and the surgical patient: The effect of music on anxiety. AORN
Journal 48, no. 1: 64-69. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004.
Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health.
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

158
Mroczek, J., G. Miketarian, E. K. Vieira, and T. Rotarius. 2005. Hospital design and staff
perceptions: An exploratory analysis. The Health Care Manager 24, no. 3: 233-
244.

Newman, M. A. 1990. Newman’s theory of health as praxis. Nursing Science Quarterly

3, no. 1: 37-41.

Newman, M. A. 1994. Health as expanding consciousness, 2nd ed., no. 14-2626, 173.
New York, NY. National League for Nursing Press.

Nightingale, F. 1969. Notes on Nursing: What it is, and what it is not. New York, NY: D.
Appleton and Company. Reprinted in New York NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
(Orig. pub. 1860)

Nilsson, U., N. Rawal, L. E. Unestahl, C. Zetterbert, and M. Unosson. 2001. Improved

recovery after music and therapeutic suggestions during general anesthesia: A
double-blind randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
45, no. 7: 812-817. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing
spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal
of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

O’Malley, P. G. 2005. Studying optimal healing environments: Challenges and proposals.

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 11, Supp. 1: S17-S22.

Osuch, E. and C. C. Engel. 2004. Research on the treatment of trauma spectrum

responses: The role of the optimal healing environment and neurobiology. Paper
presented at Toward Optimal Healing Environments in Health Care: Second
American Samueli Symposium, Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of
Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S211-S221.

Parker, K. P. 1989. The theory of sentience evaluation: A practice level theory of

sleeping, walking, and beyond waking patterns based on the science of unitary
human beings. Rogerian Nursing Science News 2, no. 1, 4-6.

Parse, R. R. 1992. Human becoming: Parse’s theory of nursing. Nursing Science

Quarterly, 5, no. 1: 35-42.

Parse, R. R. 2001. Qualitative inquiry: the path of sciencing. Sudbury, MA: Jones and
Baratlett Publishers.

Paterson, J. and Zrerad, L. 1976. Humanistic nursing. New York, NY: John Wiley and
Sons.

159
Peloquin, S. 1996. Art: An occupation with promise for developing empathy. The
American Journal of Occupational Therapy 50, no. 8: 655-61.

Pew-Fetzer Task Force on Advancing Psychosocial Health Education. 1994. Health

professions education and relationship-centered care. San Francisco, CA: Pew
Health Professions Commission.

Quinn, J. E. 1992. Holding sacred space: The nurse as healing environment. Holistic
Nursing Practice 6, no. 4: 26-36.

Quinn, J., M. Smith, M. Watson, C. Ritenbaugh, and K. Swanson. 2003. Research

guidelines for assessing the impact of the healing relationship in clinical nursing.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 9, no. 3: A65-A79.

Rashotte, J., F. Fothergill-Bourbonnais, and M. Chamberlain. 1997. Pediatric intensive

care nurses and their grief experiences: A phenomenological study: Heart and
lung. The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 26, no. 5: 372-386.

Redd, W. H., S. L. Manne, B. Peters, P. B. Jacobsen, and H. Schmidt. 1994. Fragrance

administration to reduce anxiety during MR imaging. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging 4, no. 4: 623-626. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S.
Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an
impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1:
S71-S83.

Reed, P. G. 1991. Towards a nursing theory of self-transcendence: Deductive

reformulation using developmental theories. Advances in Nursing 13, no. 4: 64-
77.

Reed, P. G. 1997. The place of transcendence in nursing’s science of unitary human

beings: Theory and research. Patterns of Rogerian knowing ed. M. Madrid, 187-
196. New York, NY: National League for Nursing Press.

Rhodes, J. M. R. 1990. A philosophical study of the art of nursing explored within a

metatheoretical framework of philosophy of art and aesthetics. PhD dissertation,
University of South Carolina.

Robertson, P. Music and health. Design & health – The therapeutic benefits of design.
2nd. Annual International Congress on Design and Health, Karolinska Institute,
Stockholm, Sweden, 19 June 2000:78. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S.
Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an
impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1:
S71-S83.

160
Robinson-Smith, G. 2002. Prayer after Stroke: Its relationship to quality of life. Journal
of Holistic Nursing, 20, no. 4: 352-366.

Rogers, M. E. 1970. An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia:

F.A. Davis.

Rogers, M. E. 1980. Nursing: A science of unitary man. In Conceptual models for

nursing practice, 2nd ed. eds. J. R. Riehl & C. Roy, 329-337. New York, NY:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Rogers, M. E. 1990. Nursing: Science of unitary, irreducible, human beings: Visions of

Rogers’ Science-Based Nursing ed. E.A.M. Barrett. New York, NY: National
League for Nursing Press.

Rogers, M. E. 1992. Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly 5, no.
1, 27-34.

Rogers, M. E. 1994. Nursing science evolves. Rogers’ Scientific Art of Nursing Practice
eds. M. Madrid and E.A.M. Barrett, 3-9. New York, NY: National League for
Nursing Press.

Rogers’ Scientific Art of Nursing Practice. 1994. Collected works. Ed. Mary Madrid and
Elizabeth Ann Manhart Barrett. New York, NY: National League for Nursing
Press.

Safran, D. G., W. Miller, and H. Beckman, 2006. Organizational dimensions of

relationship-centered care: Theory, evidence and practice. Journal of General
Internal Medicine 21, Supp. 1: S9-S15.

Sandel, S. L., J. O. Judge, N. Landry, L. Faria, R. Ouellette and M. Majczak. 2005.

Dance and movement program improves quality-of-life measures in breast cancer
survivors. Cancer Nursing 28, no. 4: 301-309.

Sarter, B. 1988. The stream of becoming: A study of Martha Rogers’ theory. New York,
NY: National League for Nursing Press.

Schneider, M. A. and R. C. Mannell. 2006. Beacon in the storm: An exploration of the

spirituality and faith of parents whose children have cancer. Issues in
Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 29, no. 1: 3-24.

Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of

environmental design that make an impact on health. Paper presented at Toward
Optimal Healing Environments in Health Care: Second American Samueli

161
 Symposium, Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Sherman, D.W., X. Y. Ye, C. McSherry, M. Calabrese, V. Parkas, and M. Gatto. 2005.

Spiritual well-being as a dimension of quality of life for patients with advanced
cancer and AIDS and their family caregivers: Results of a longitudinal study.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 22, no. 5: 349-362.

Slevin and Sines. 1999. Enhancing the truthfulness, consistency, and transferability of a
qualitative study utilizing a manifold of approaches. Nurse Researcher 7: 79-97.

Smith, D. W. 194. Toward developing a theory of spirituality. Visions: The Journal of

Rogerian Nursing Science 2: 35-43.

Smith, M. J. 1986. Human environment process: A test of Rogers’ principle of

integrality. Advances Nursing Science 8, no. 1: 21-28. Paper presented at Toward
Optimal Healing Environments in Health Care: Second American Samueli
Symposium, Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Smith, M. C. 1999. Caring and the science of unitary human beings. Advanced Nursing
Science 21, no. 4: 14-28.

Smith, M. C., J. Kemp, L. Hemphill, and C. P. Vojir. 2002. Outcomes of therapeutic

massage for hospitalized cancer patients. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 34, no.
4: 257-262.

Swanson, K. and D. Woinar. 2004. Optimal healing environments in nursing. Journal of

Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S43-S48.

Takman, C. and E. I. Severinsson. 1999. A description of health care professionals’

experiences of encounters with patients in clinical settings. Journal of Advanced
Nursing 30, no. 6: 1368-1374.

Taylor, M. and K. Keighron. 2004. Healing is who we are…and who are we? Nursing
Administrative Quarterly 28, no. 4: 241-248.

Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1970. Activation of energy, translated by R. Hague, London, UK:

Collins.

Thompson, M. B. and N. M. Coppens. 1994. The effects of guided imagery on anxiety

levels and movement of clients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Holistic
Nursing Practice 9, no. 2: 59-69.

162
Thorne, S. E. 1991. Methodological orthodoxy in qualitative nursing research: Analysis
of the issues. Qualitative Health Research 1, no. 2:178-199.

Thorne, S., S. R. Kirkham, and J. MacDonald-Emes. 1997. Interpretive description

noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge.
Research in Nursing and Health 20, no. 2: 169-177.

Topf, M. M. and J. Davis. 1993. Critical care unit noise and rapid eye movement (REM)
sleep. Heart and Lung 22, no. 3: 252-258. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S.
Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an
impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1:
S71-S83.

Tschirch, P. 1997. Nightingale on healing, Reflections on Healing: A Central Nursing

Construct ed. P.B. Kritek, 43-55. New York, NY: National League for Nursing
Press.
.
Ulrich, R. S. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.
Science 224, no. 4647: 420-421.

Ulrich, R. S. 1993. Effects of exposure to nature and abstract pictures in patients

recovering from open heart surgery. Journal Soc Pyhschophysiol Research 30,
Supp 1: 7: 204-221. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing
spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal
of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Ulrich, R. S. 1995. Effects of health facility interior design on wellness: Theory and
recent scientific research. Journal of Health Care Design 3: 97-109. Reprinted in
Mayberry SO ed Innovations in Healthcare Design. New York, NY: Van
Nostrand Reinhold. (Org. pub. 1991.) Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton.
2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on
health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Ulrich, R. S. 1999. Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. Healing
gardens: therapeutic benefits and design recommendations eds. Marcus, C.
Barnes M., 27-86. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin,
and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that
make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10,
Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Ulrich, R. S. 2000a. Effects of healthcare environmental design on medical outcomes.

Design & Health – The Therapeutic Benefits of Design, 49-59. Proceedings of 2nd
International Congress on Design and Health. Karolinska Institute Stockholm,
Sweden, 19 June 2000. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004.

163
 Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health.
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Ulrich, R. S. 2000b. Evidence based environmental design for improving medical

outcomes. Proceedings of the Healing by Design: Building for Health Care in the
21st Century Conference. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1-10 March 2000.
Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of
environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Villagomeza, L. 2005. Spiritual distress in adult cancer patients: Toward conceptual

clarity. Holistic Nursing Practice 19, no. 6: 285-294.

Walker, K. and M. Alligood. 2001. Empathy from a nursing perspective: Moving beyond
borrowed theory. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing XV, no. 3: 140-147.

Wall, L. M. 2000. Changes in hope and power in lung cancer patients with exercise.
Nursing Science Quarterly 12, no. 3: 234-242.

Walton, J. (1996). Spiritual relationships: a concept analysis. Journal of Holistic Nursing

14, no. 3: 237-250.

Wang, S. M., L. Kulkarni, J. Dolev, and Z N. Kain. 2002. Music and pre-operative
anxiety: A randomized, controlled study. Anesthesia & Analgesia 94, no. 6: 1489-
1494. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces:
Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of
Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Watson, J. and M. Smith. 2002. Caring science and the science of unitary human beings:
a trans-theoretical discourse for nursing knowledge development. Journal of
Advanced Nursing 37, no. 5: 452-461.

Wagner, E. H., B. M. Bennett, B. A. Brian, T. Austin, S. M. Greene, J. K. Schaefer, and

M. Vonkorff. 2005. Finding common ground: Patient-centeredness and evidence-
based chronic illness care. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
11, Supp. 1: S7-S15.

Wesa, K. and P. Culliton. 2004. Recommendations and guidelines regarding the preferred
research protocol for investigating the impact of an optimal healing environment
on patients with substance abuse. Paper presented at Toward Optimal Healing
Environments in Health Care: Second American Samueli Symposium,
Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of Alternative & Complementary
Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S193-S199.

164
Wesa, K. and Grim, R. 2004. Recommendations and guidelines regarding the preferred
research protocol for investigating the impact of an optimal healing environment
on patients with hypertension. Paper presented at Toward Optimal Healing
Environments in Health Care: Second American Samueli Symposium,
Alexandria, VA. January 22-24, 2004. Journal of Alternative & Complementary
Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S245-S250.

Weze, C., H. L. Leathard, J. Grange, P. Tiplady, and G. Stevens. 2004. Evaluation of

healing by gentle touch in 35 clients with cancer. European Journal of Oncology
Nursing 8, no. 1: 40-49.

Yarcheski, A., N. E. Mahon, and T. J. Yarcheski. 2004. Health and well-being in early
adolescents using Rogers’ Science of unitary human beings. Nursing Science
Quarterly 17, no. 172-77.

Yilmaz, E., S. Ozcan, M. Basar, H. Basar, E. Batislam, and M. Ferhat. 2003. Music
decreases anxiety and provides sedation in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Urology 61, no. 2: 282-286. Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004.
Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health.
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Yinnon, A.M., Y. Ilan, B. Tadmor, G. Altarescu, C. Hershko. 1992. Quality of sleep in

the medical department. British Journal of Clinical Practice 46, no. 2: 88-91.
Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of
environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

Young, A., S. G. Taylor, and K. McLaughlin-Renpenning. 2001. Modeling nursing from

an energy field perspective. Rogers’ science of unitary human beings chapter 6.
St. Louis: Mosby.

Zahourek, R. 2005. Intentionality: Evolutionary development in healing: A grounded

theory study for holistic nursing. Journal of Holistic Nursing 23, no. 1: 89-109.

Zerwekh, J. 2000. Caring on the ragged edge: Nursing persons who are disenfranchised.
Advances in Nursing Science 22, no. 4: 47-61.

Zilber, S. 1993. Review of health effects of indoor lighting. Online document at:
http://architronic.saed.kent.edu/v2n3/v2n3.06.html. Architronic 2, no. 3.
Schweitzer, M., L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton. 2004. Healing spaces: Elements of
environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative &
Complementary Medicine 10, Supp. 1: S71-S83.

165
 VITA

Phyllis Jean Waters is currently the Director of Nursing Practice and Professional
Advancement, University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals and Clinics. Ms Waters has
held a series of nursing leadership positions over the past 35 years that include roles in
service administration, academic administration, and clinical program administration. As
the Director of the federally funded Ohio Commission on Nursing Implementation
Project (DHEW #5 DID-AU 25008-02), Ms Waters was accountable for development
and implementation the Ohio Master Plan for Nursing. Ms Waters was awarded a
National Foundation March of Dimes Grant (#9-7), to develop and pilot a continuing
nursing education model for preparing nurse clinicians to assume expanded roles within
maternity and/or neonatal high risk units. As an officer and principal consultant in
ANCER, Inc, a nursing consultation and education firm based in Columbus, Ohio, Ms
Waters provided consultation services in nursing administration, strategic planning and
organizational development to a number of hospitals in the Midwest. Ms Waters is a
member of the Texas Nurses Association, American Nurses Association, and Sigma
Theta Tau.

Education

BS, May 1969, Tift College, Forsyth, Georgia

MS, May 1977, Texas Woman’s University, Houston, Texas

Publications

Sanares, D., P. Waters, and D. Marshall. June 2007. Mainstreaming evidence-based

nursing practice. Nurse Leader 5(3): 44-49.

Waters, P.J. and M.J.Daubenmire. 1997 Therapeutic capacity : The critical variance in
nursing practice. P.B.Kritek, (Ed), Reflections on Healing: A Central Nursing
Construct. New York, NY: National League for Nursing Press.

Boodley, C., M. Wilder, P. Waters, and M. Fenton. 1997. Evolution of faculty practice at
the University of Texas Medical Branch School of Nursing at Galveston. Faculty
practice: Applying the Models [Monograph]. Washington, DC: NONPF.

Kritek, P. B. and P. Waters. 1997. Dream as healing parable. Reflections on Healing: A

Central Nursing Construct edited by P. B. Kritek, 568-570. New York, NY:
National League for Nursing Press.

Board of Nurse Examiners [P. Waters., chairperson and primary contributing author].
1993. Final report of the manpower subcommittee (Vol. 2). Austin, TX: Author.
Waters, P., and P. Morris. 1985. ANCER, Inc. A pioneering effort in Distributive
nursing. distributive nursing practice: A systems approach to community health,
2nd ed. edited by Joanne E. Hall and Barbara Weaver. Philadelphia: J.B.
Lippincott.

Waters, P. (staff author). 1983. Preceptor program resource document. Master Plan
Implementation Report Series No. 43. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio Department of Health,
Division of Nursing.

Waters, P. (staff author). 1983. Three perspectives on the clinical nurse Specialist's role,
function, and preparation: clinical nurse specialist, graduate faculty, and a service
oriented task force. Master Plan Implementation Report Series No. 21. Columbus,
Ohio: Ohio Department of Health, Division of Nursing.

Ohio Department of Health, Division of Nursing [P. Waters., project director and major
contributing author]. 1981. Ohio master plan for nursing. Columbus, Ohio: Author.

Waters, P. 1978. Designing educational materials: Their content and complexity.

proceedings of the conference on perinatal outreach programs: Their integral parts
and process, edited by Mitzi Duxberry, et al., New York, NY: National Foundation
March of Dimes.