I. Doctrine of Separation of Powers - is a fundamental principle in our
system of government. It obtains not through express provision but by actual division in our Constitution. The doctrine declares that governmental powers are divided among the three departments of government, the legislative, executive, and judicial, and broadly operates to confine legislative powers to the legislature, executive powers to the executive department, and judicial powers to the judiciary, precluding one branch of the government from exercising or invading the powers of another.
The doctrine of separation of powers of government also operates to restrict
the exercise of judicial functions to administrative agencies. Since the legislature cannot exercise judicial it certainly is precluded from delegating the exercise of judicial functions to administrative agencies or officers.
II. Doctrine of Non-delegation of Powers - is based on the maxim of
potestas delegata non potest delegari. What has been delegated cannot in turn be delegated. The doctrine rests on the ethical principle that a delegated power constitutes not only a right but a duty to be performed by the delegate by the instrumentality of his own judgment acting immediately upon the matter and not through the intervening mind of another. A further delegation of such power would indeed constitute a negation of the duty in violation of the trust reposed in the delegate mandated to discharge it directly.
This doctrine is not absolute. It does not preclude a certain degree of
admixture of the three powers of government in administrative agencies. A particular administrative agency has legislative and judicial, or legislative, executive, and judicial powers or functions, sometimes softened by a "quasi" or stated to be in nature legislative and judicial, and sometimes stated to be in addition to administrative powers.
III. REQUISITES FOR DELEGATION
(a) COMPLETENESS OF THE STATUTE- must be complete in itself, must set
forth therein the policy to be executed, and must be carried out or implemented by the delegate. (b) SUFFICIENT STANDARD - depends upon the nature of the power exercised and the nature of the right restricted by such power; it also depends upon whether or not proper regulation or control requires the vesting of such discretion. Detailed standards are not required, especially in regulatory enactments under the police power. Examples of standards held sufficient include: "necessity," "necessary or expedient," "appropriate," "reasonable," "just and reasonable," "fair and equitable," "sufficient," "excessive profits,"
IV. PERMISSIBLE DELEGATION OF LEGISLATIVE POWER UNDER THE
CONSTITUTION – Article VI, Sec 23 [Emergency power delegated to the Pres. In times of war; Article VI, Sec 28 [delegation of taxing power to fix tariffs], Article X, Sec 3 [Enactment of LGC which shall provide a more responsible and accountable local government; Article X, Sec. 5 [LGU’s power to create its own sources of revenue]
V. ADJUDICATORY POWERS- describe powers and functions which involve
the decision or determination by administrative agencies of the rights, duties, and obligations of specific individuals and persons, as contrasted with powers (i.e., rule making) of administrative agencies which, while they may involve decisions or determinations in the broadest sense, involve persons generally rather than specially, and usually operate only prospectively.
As distinguished from judicial power - Where the duty is primarily to decide
questions of legal rights between private parties with respect to the matter in controversy, such decision being the primary object and not merely incidental to regulation or some other administrative function, the question raised is judicial involving the exercise of judicial function.
As distinguished from investigative power –to adjudicate is to settle in the
exercise of judicial authority while to investigate is to discover, to find out, to learn, obtain information and nowhere included or intimated is the notion of settling, deciding or resolving a controversy involved in the facts.
As distinguished from legislative power - a rule is the product of rule-making
and rule-making is a part of the administrative process that resembles a legislature's enactment of statutes. Adjudication is the part of the administrative process that resembles a court's decision of a case.