Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

MARIA SABINA LOPEZ LUJANO

A0081968

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICE

ANALYSE OF THE OFFICIAL RESOLUTION TO IMPLEMENT THE IEPS TAX TO SUGAR


BEVERAGES.

Arguments Claims Affirmations Supossitions


- The high consumption - ..is fundamental to - ..the - ..should
of sugar added have a State policy Secretaría de represent call
beverages contributes for being able to Salud, is in its for action and
in a notorious manner change food way to definition of
to the excess of consumption and instrument a public policies
energetic intakes physical activity “National that will favor
- Given the problematic patterns of the strategy for the reduction
of high prevalence of Mexican society the obesity of sugar
these diseases and its - … So, considering and diabetes added
impacts that the high control” , beverages
- ..thru the prevalence of whose
establishment at the overweight and purpose is to Represents a personal
producer and obesity represent a comply with point of view which,
importer level, of a problem of public the strategies given the nature of
specific quota of 1 health of great established by the text, needs to be
peso per liter of sugar magnitude for the Plan sustained with
beverages, including México, Nacional de another data.
concentrated, syrups, - ..important to Desarrollo
flavor extracts or reinforce effective 2013-2018,
essences, according to policies and - …follow the
its yield, that when programs for the lines of action
diluted produce prevention of to reduce the
beverages with any obesity. mortality by
type of sugar added. chronic
diseases such
Claims that as
Misses facts and/or supports the idea hypertension,
numbers that can prove of arguments. diabetes,
this.

Affirmations with a
good base to sustain
the text.
MARIA SABINA LOPEZ LUJANO
A0081968

CONCLUSION

Following the text “Sugar beverages, to lower obesity”, it can be found a great variety of
claims and affirmations. These can give support to the whole text with additional secondary
ideas that can help in favor of the arguments. Said so, arguments presented in this text are
limited and constrained with no data, facts or numbers that can help sustain the idea. In
this kind of government initiatives, it’s important to give more weight into arguments based
on this kind of data. The solution presented makes sense if claims, affirmations, and
suppositions where all true, but giving the nature of them, affirmations should be led the
text. After all, I consider the solution interesting but with lack of statistics that can make
sense to the government responsible. I also consider the benefits are only viewed from one
only point of view and there’s a need to consider all the variables and aspects involved with
the installation of this new kind of tax.

Potrebbero piacerti anche