Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2
About What?
University of Genoa
3
1. Heavy Duty Gas Turbine University of Genoa
510 MW 557 MW
4
Heavy Duty Gas Turbine Summary University of Genoa
air cooling
closed-loop steam cooling
open-loop air cooling
Turbomachinery International • November/December 2013 S. C. GÜLEN MODERN GAS TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE NET THERMAL EFFICIENCY RATINGS OF 60% ARE HERE —WHAT’S NEXT?
5
Turbogas General Electric 9FA+e University of Genoa
CTD 390°C
2015 2017
7
7
Comparison F class vs G class
University of Genoa
BRUCIATORI SEV
Compression Stages 22 TURBINA LP
9
9
AEN Turbogas GT26 – ReHeat (2016) University of Genoa
10
10
Confronto Ciclo Semplice vs RH
University of Genoa
SC Heavy Duty RH
GE 9F.05 AEN GT26
η [%] 38.2 41
β 18.3 (14 stages) 34 (22 stages)
T4 (T.O.T) [°C] 640 (3 stages) 650 (1+4 stages)
T3 (T.I.T) [°C] / eta_t=0.9 1450 1155/1290
Exhaust Energy [MW] 498 470
725.3 715
L_s [kJ/kg] 432 482
SC P_el [MW] 314 345
GT turndown MEL [%] 35% 10%
GT Ramp Rate (MW/min) 24(7.6%/min) 33 (9.5%/min)
Startup time [hot,Minutes] 23 -
Nox at Base Load [ppmvd] @15%O2 25 <30
CO [ppm] @15%O2 24 <10
11
AEN Turbogas GT36 (2016) University of Genoa
AE 94.3 A2 (2007)
13
Turbogas Ansaldo Energia AE94.3 A University of Genoa
14
Turbogas Siemens 8000H University of Genoa
La prima H- Class
Prodotta (2010)
16
2. Gas Turbine Control University of Genoa
17
GT Control: IGV, Inlet Guide Vane University of Genoa
18
GT Control: IGV e m_fuel University of Genoa
TET = TOT
1. Start up Phase: GT
reaches full speed no load
(FSNL). Speed Control
2. IGV_min (fully closed), increase of the TOT Temperature with the load. Reduction of the air-fuel ratio
(AFR), Load Control.
3. Regulating IGV, AFR is fairly constant and so TOT, Load Control
4. IGV_max (fully open), a load increase (due to increase of fuel) reduces the AFR increasing TOT, until T
limitation is reached, Load Control.
19
REHEAT GT control: IGV + 2 m_fuel University of Genoa
20
GT Control in CCPP: Effects over HRSG University of Genoa
21
TG Controls: effect on emissions University of Genoa
The pollutant emission if a gas fired Turbine and relevant to the local environment are :
The residence time usually does not change much on part-load because the
normalized flow approximately remains constant with a variable load
22
Flame Type University of Genoa
Increasing Premix
Reducing NOx
Increase CC instability
23
TG Control: Burner design -1 University of Genoa
24
TG Control: Burner design -1 University of Genoa
PILOT PREMIX
Rich, Higher temperatures, Lean, Lower Temperature, less Nox
Annular Chamber stability Production
25
TG Control: Burner design -2 University of Genoa
L • FSNL: central burner in premix while the external burners stage are in diffusion
Fuel nozzle o (high NOx).
a • 20 % load 3 external burners switch to premix mode,
d • 30 % load all in premix mode (MEL). Transition Piece
Forward can
26
TG Control: Burner design -3 University of Genoa
27
Acoustic instabilities University of Genoa
In lean premixed combustion systems, flows are designed to be turbulent to enhance the mixing of fuel and air. The
turbulence causes a fluctuating heat release resulting in acoustic waves travelling through the combustion chamber, are
reflected at the boundaries, and travel back to the burner. There they tend to influence the flow field and close a thermo-
acoustic feedback cycle, allowing combustion instabilities to develop.
28
Acoustic instabilities University of Genoa
Passive Solutions:
- Humming Frequencyes <> Combustion
Chamber Frequencyes
- Design for low frequency Vortex reduction
- break the symmetry (e.g. CBO)
29
Pollutant Control - NOx University of Genoa
Primary measures: For new gas turbines, dry low NOX premix burners (DLN) are BAT. For existing gas turbines, water and
steam injection (1.7 Meuro @140MWth) or conversion to the DLN technique is BAT (2 Meuro @140MWth).
DLN burner
CO is a pollutant which is created only a part load. The CO limits the turndown capability of a gas based Power Plant =>
Minimum Environmental Load. This aspect become crucial nowadays as a flexibility quality.
Primary measures: reduction in CO formation are achieved by Combustion Optimization (good design of the combustion
equipment, optimisation of the temperature (e.g. efficient mixing of the fuel and combustion air) and residence time in the
combustion zone, and/or use of an advanced control system. Just a cold spot can quench the reaction!
32
Boundary Conditions: Ambient University of Genoa
POWER HR
ISO
PCC PCC
ACT
/ CfPTamb ISO
CS CC CSCC
ACT
CfCS Tamb
33
Boundary Conditions: Gas quality University of Genoa
For the gas turbine operator, the most likely issues associated with fuel composition variation are
associated with the combustion system in the gas turbine and include:
high levels of pollutant emissions, especially oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide
component life and integrity issues due to factors such as flame flashback and unstable combustion
operability issues such as ignition problems and flame failure
[4] Brown M., Bryant N., Haynes D., Study on LNG Quality Issues, a study for the European Commission – 34
JRC Institute for Energy prepared by Advantica Ltd., Loughborough, The UK, April 2008
Boundary Conditions: Gas quality University of Genoa
higher hydrocarbons are summarized as “C2+”, which is the sum of all mole
fractions of hydrocarbons with more than one C-atom. At the same time
todays gas supplies may carry a large and varying content of inert gases,
mainly CO2 and some N2
Riccius, Smith, Guthe, Flohr, THE GT24/26 COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY AND HIGH HYDROCARBON (“C2+”) FUELS, GT2005-68799 35
CCPP – Performance evolution (design) University of Genoa
Why 50 Hz Machine produces approx. 40% more power than the 60 Hz ones
equipped with the same technology?
Rotational force depend on squared rotational speed => 3600^2/3000^2=1.44
60 Hz machine size must be ca 40% smaller than the 50 Hz
36
CCPP – Performance evolution University of Genoa
45
40
35
30
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
I - CCPP [18] UK - CCPP [19] UK+IE - NGPP [20]
D - NGPP [20] FR - NGPP [20] DK+FI+SE -NGPP [20]
Wim Broos
SVP Thermal Fleet Management
38
380 MW CCPP: Operating Data University of Genoa
140 7.000
121
120 115 6.000
5.973
100 91 5.000
80 4.000
3.651
60 3.000
40 2.827 2.000
1.562
1.511
20 1.000
0 0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
39
Ancillary Services – MSD
University of Genoa
UCTE Handbook: “Ancillary services” are all services which support elementary functions of electric power system and
they are supplied by subjects dealing of production, control and transmission of electric power.
Ancillary Services are:
• frequency control;
Part of those services are mandatory, other are offered on a special market (Mercato dei
Servizi di Dispacciamento, MSD), where Active power is «payd as bid», on the base of
the TSO (Transmission System Operator) indications.
40
Flexibility: Solution for CCPP University of Genoa
41
Reduce Minimum Environmental Load University of Genoa
other solutions:
• CO Catalyst
42
Minimizing the MEL: IGV position University of Genoa
CO after CO
TETC = TOT
before
43
Minimizing the MEL: By-passing Burner University of Genoa
Blow-off Valves
Cooling Valves
An optimization of the minimum load performance can be obtained by reducing the mass flow rate entering the
combustion chamber through:
- Regulating Blow-off valves: discharging mass flow directly to the HRSG diffusor (MEL -12%)
- Regulating Cooling valves: increasing the air mass flow rate fed to cool the 2° and 3° vanes (MEL -4%)
44
Low MEL: Recirculating compressor University of Genoa
45
Low MEL: Recirculating compressor University of Genoa
46
Inlet Heating:
MEL reduction and part load efficiency University of Genoa
An optimization of the part load performance can be obtained increasing the inlet temperature by the means of
an heat exchanger. The effect is the reduction of the off-design condition (higher efficiency) during part load,
while maintaining the same power production. Moreover this solution help to decrease the MEL.
This upgrade requires the installation of and air water Heat exchanger in the filter house resulting in an
addictional pressure drops at GT inlet
2
1,8
GT inlet
Impact on efficiency [%]
1,6
1,4 temperature
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
Load / Base Load ISO
20°C (+5°C) 25°C (+10°C) 30°C(+15°C) 35°C (+20°C)
47
TG Control: Burner design University of Genoa
48
Minimizing the MEL: CO catalyst University of Genoa
The CO catalyst allows the reduction of the MEL of 25% without additional
impact over the GT off-design
The positive effect over the CO emission can be exploited to reduce TIT on all
that condition in which performance is not critical, reducing the High
Temperature Degradation Effect over the Expander
49
Case Study: flexibility in the electrical market:
start up cost Vs production revenues University of Genoa
Daily Cycling is
mandatory
50
Case Study: flexibility in the electrical market:
start up cost vs production revenues (Base Load) University of Genoa
51
Case Study: flexibility in the electrical market:
start up cost vs production revenues (Base Load) University of Genoa
52
4. Combined Cycle Management University of Genoa
54
Start-up Efficiency Impact University of Genoa
Taking into account the start-up, the efficiency drops from 54.7 to 53.6
55
Combined Cycle Start-up Potential Saving University of Genoa
Minimo Tecnico
Gradiente di Tempo per il
Carico TG massimo Gruppo TG1 (MW) TG2 (MW) TV (MW) CCGT (MW)
(MW/min) carico (min) GE in 1+1 70 - 72 142
GE in 2+1 70 70 140 280
AEN 6.5 -13 40 - 20 AEN in 1+1 146 - 70 216
AEN in 2+1 146 146 150 442
GE 20 13
58
GT behaviour impact over Start-up Costs University of Genoa
Cost [euro/MWh]
reduce start up time and cost
Electricity
Start up cost of 2 different 10000
Units: UNIT 1
0
0 20 40 60 80
Electricity price [euro/MWh]
59
St-Up: 2+1 AEN/Siemens (Hot Pressurized) University of Genoa
60
St-Up: 2+1 GE (Warm) University of Genoa
HRSG Minimo
PURGING FLAME ON tecnico
61
GT Control: IGV e m_fuel – OPFLex VLP University of Genoa
Dr. Artur Ulbrich, Andy Jones, Christian Schäferkordt, Stuart Simpson, Increasing 62
competitiveness of CCGT plants in a dynamic market: An owner´s approach
GT Control: IGV e m_fuel – OPFLex VLP University of Genoa
Dr. Artur Ulbrich, Andy Jones, Christian Schäferkordt, Stuart Simpson, Increasing 63
competitiveness of CCGT plants in a dynamic market: An owner´s approach
GT Control: IGV e m_fuel – OPFLex VLP University of Genoa
Dr. Artur Ulbrich, Andy Jones, Christian Schäferkordt, Stuart Simpson, Increasing 64
competitiveness of CCGT plants in a dynamic market: An owner´s approach
St-Up: Bottoming Cycle Limitations University of Genoa
Stress Evaluator) 40
20
0
0 10 20 30
minutes50
40 60 70 80 90
Length of main steam piping P Drum HP ini 0 bar
P Drum HP ini 12 bar
P Drum HP ini 6 bar
P Drum HP ini 20 bar
Drains design
Drains review to reduce the main steam piping
warming time
Once trough Benson Boiler, is an option for start
up not constrained by the Drum thickness
65
Reduce cost of Start-up: ST characteristic University of Genoa
66
St-Up: Bottoming Cycle Initial Conditions University of Genoa
Start up are classified on the base of the initial conditions of the bottoming Cycle when the
start up maneuver is initiated:
• Steam Turbine Metal Temperature ( Rotor centre or first vane); GT flue Gs Temperature
• High Pressure Drum Pressure
HP Drum T Rotor Gradiente giri TV Full Speed time Main Steam Steam Temperature
Start –Up Type Stand Still (h)
Pressure (bar) Centre(°C) (rpm/min) (min)
Cold t>64 p<2 < 150 75 40 ST Metal Temperature
Warm 16<t<64 p<12 150 < T < 370 150 20
Hot t<16 p<12 T > 370 300 10
Temperature Mismatch < 50
K (stress reduction)
Hot pressurized t<16 p>12 T > 370 300 10
67
St-Up: Bottoming Cycle Initial Conditions University of Genoa
68
Rotor Stress Evaluator (RSE) University of Genoa
69
Stress Evaluation and Low Cycle Fatigue University of Genoa
70
Warm Start-up (T_initial =345°C ) University of Genoa
600 600
500 500
400 400
TEMPERATURE [°C]
POWER [MW]
300 300
200 200
100 100
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
TIME [min]
Surface Temperature Mean Temperature Center Temperature
Turbogas Power Steam Turbine Power
100
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
STRESS [MPa]
-100
Radial Stress
-200 Circumferential Stress
Axial Stress
-300
-400
TIME [min]
71
Warm Start-up (T_initial =345°C ) University of Genoa
400
300
STRESS [MPa]
200 Surface
Center
100
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
TIME [min]
Start Up Downtime Initial Rotor Mean Gradient Temperature Maximum Specific Life
[h] Temperature [°C/h ] Variation Number of Consumption
[°C ] [°C ] Cycles [%]
72
CLE Curves – HP Rotor University of Genoa
73
Curve CLE – HP Rotor University of Genoa
WARM COLD
40 h SS 144 h SS
Ti = 345 °C Ti = 150 °C
N = 3300 N = 600
COLD
HOT 240 h SS
18 h SS Ti = 90 °C
Ti = 394 °C N = 600
N = 14000
HOT
6 h SS
Ti = 450 °C
N > 100000
74
ST Yearly Life Consumption Estimation University of Genoa
Basing on operating conditione the average yearly start-up related life consumption
was evaluated
Miner-Robinson rule was use to combine LCF Life Expenditure and creep effect due to
high temperature normal operation (creep-rupture life 300,000 h ).
75
Maintenance Cost in CCPP University of Genoa
The LTSA, Long Term Service Agreement, offers to the power plant owner a series of planned maintenance outages.
700
Interval between outages is defined on the base of the operating duty of the machine (load profile)
600
FH/avv_lim=31.7
500
STARTS
Starts
14h/d
300
TGB
200
TGA
TGC
100 24h 5/7 Weekly
24h 2/7 Quarterly Montlhy
0
Fired Hours 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
EQUIVALENT OPERATIVE HOURS
Usually Equivalent Operative Hours,EOH , are use to taking into Profili di carico Cycling Limit Limiti per la manutenzione
account the impact of start-up (1 start- up = 10 Fired Hours) and Nowadays the maintence limit is reached on the
this was used to evaluate maintenance costs over the Maintence maximum number of starts, so if the machine is operated
Interval (e.g. 25000 EOH) (hourly cost approach) (ca 180eur/h). for less than 31.7 hours per start-up the maintence cost
related increases (tipically up to 6000 eur )
76
Major Factors Influencing GT Maintenance University of Genoa
Num. Of Start-up
EOH / Start Up 10 EOH 400
0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
FH
79
Comparison of Operational Profiles University of Genoa
TGB
200
Operational Maintenance Interval TGA
Profiles FH/avv EOH / MI FH / MI TGC
100 Weekly
6 h/d 6 9600 3600 24h 2/7 24h 5/7
10 h/d 10 12000 6000 Quarterly Monthly
0
14 h/d 14 14400 8400 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Profili di carico Cycling Limit Limiti per la manutenzione
24 h 2/7 48 25000 20690
24 h 5/7 120 25000 23077
Weekly 168 25000 23596 • 11,44 h for TGA;
Monthly 730 25000 24662
average FH / avv: • 10.29 h for TGB;
Quarterly 2182 25000 24886 • 9.4 h for TGC.
80
5. On line Performance Monitoring University of Genoa
81
FLEXIBILITY – Process Control University of Genoa
82
Flexible Monitoring of CCPP
University of Genoa
Test
5/13
NOX – Abnormal behaviour University of Genoa
86
Proposte di Tesi
University of Genoa
5. Analisi tecno-economica dei Sistemi di Accumulo Elettrici e Termici per la gestione della rete
elettrici
87