_______________________________________________________________________

DENVER DISTRICT COURT

STATE OF COLORADO
1437 Bannock Street, Room 256
Denver CO 80202
(720) 865-8612

Plaintiff: Case No: 2015CV30918

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Div. 424*
a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado
* Receiver filed its motion
falsely in wrong court.
Defendant:
TELE COMM RESOURCES, Limited
Partnership, a Nevada limited Partnership,
also dba TELE COMM RESOURCE, LP

OBJECTION TO RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR FINAL CONTRACT TO SELL and

BRUCE’S MOTION TO VOID PRIOR COURT ORDERS AFTER A HEARING
_______________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff and receiver are counting on this new court to reflexively rubber stamp their

effort to steal the equity of Douglas Bruce (“Bruce”) in his York-Gaylord FIRST deed of

trust, which was recorded in 2004, about 10 years before the bogus lien was filed against

defendant (NOT Bruce). They now want to SELL A PROPERTY THEY DO NOT OWN

and seize the proceeds to 1) pay themselves for their illegal receivership actions, 2) pay

Denver’s illegal claim against the FORMER OWNER, and 3) steal the equity of Bruce in

his note and first deed of trust—all illegal.

There is NO EQUITY other than Bruce’s deeds of trust. They will also swindle a new

buyer. Denver and the receiver will stop at nothing to use the equity to pay themselves

and punish Bruce, NOT a party here, for writing TABOR, the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.
 No court order can override basic state lien priority law, which favors Bruce’s lien.

The receiver has DEMOLISHED all eight fourplexes. Bruce must be allowed to foreclose

and then sell the property. No matter what, Bruce will not give in. See Fifth, Eighth, and

Fourteenth Amendments to the U. S. Constitution, the supreme law of the land.

Prior judges have refused to make Bruce a party, though he is the real party in

interest by virtue of his first deeds of trust on both York-Gaylord and 601 Lipan. His

equity in the former is the entire value (c. $5 million) and c. $1 million in the latter. He

finally verified the illegal “sale” of Lipan to a billionaire operating a foundation. Bruce,

a former Deputy D.A., advises this court he is being swindled by plaintiff and receiver,

who ignore his deeds of trust recorded in 1998 (Lipan) and 2004 (York-Gaylord).

Plaintiff tried to steal the York-Gaylord property before, through an asset forfeiture

proceeding that went to the state supreme court and resulted in a supreme court ruling

the city attorney’s office was irreversibly biased against Bruce and could not pursue its

attempted seizure of this property, two acres with eight fourplexes. A substitute attorney

was appointed who promptly dismissed the case. Now plaintiff is trying again, by hiring

a receiver, to evade the supreme court order to cease Denver’s corruption against Bruce.

Bruce has consistently objected in writing to threatened sales and demolitions; read

the file. He objects to this attempted sale which excludes paying off his recorded equity.

The legal perversion of Denver and the receiver alleging they are preventing waste
and destruction of the York property is insane. They are milking it for personal gain and

preventing a foreclosure sale and resale that would clear title and allow renovation and

profitable use. They are violating the true purpose and intent of a lawful receivership.

The receiver admitted in a recent pleading it never served the true owner of record,

Roger McCarville, in any of these proceedings. It first sent McCarville documents two

years after the case was filed (!) Not only has this lengthy farce been utterly illegal, it

was FILED AGAINST THE WRONG DEFENDANT. McCarville has no judgment

against him in the administrative hearing charade or other actions taken in this case. The

fake judgment Denver and the receiver want to give priority over Bruce’s lien, recorded

in 2004, is against a party WHO HAS NOT BEEN THE OWNER FOR SIX YEARS.

The action of owner McCarville did NOT reconvey title to defendant since McCarville

did not notify “TCR,” and TCR neither knew of nor accepted the transfer. That is basic

property law known to every first-year law student. If Dirty Dan secretly deeds an EPA

pollution site to Judge Martin Egelhoff, it would be an invalid transfer—no acceptance.

BRUCE WILL NOT RELEASE HIS DEED OF TRUST UNTIL THE NOTE IS

PAID, PRESUMABLY BY A FORECLOSURE. No receiver or court can convey clear

title otherwise, so this fraudulent exercise is a waste of time and an ongoing crime.

The motion to sell must be denied. BRUCE requests a hearing in open court.

Please schedule it no earlier than 10 a.m. due to rush hour traffic from Colorado Springs.
 As a newly-assigned judge, you must order a court hearing in person to learn

what has transpired in this shocking, fraudulent proceeding, and begin to undo it.

You said before my claim has been litigated; that is false. I am not allowed to be a

party to this case. To say ignoring written claims is to litigate them is dishonest. The

case is still active and thus has not been appealed. That is NOT due process of law.

I verify the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Submitted,

_____________________________
Douglas Bruce
Box 26018
Colorado Springs CO 80936
taxcutter@msn.com
(719) 550-0010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on February 14, 2019 I mailed a copy of this OBJECTION…. to the
following:

Jacques Machol John Tanner

Machol & Johannes, LLC Fairfield & Woods
700 17th Street, #200 1801 California Street #2600
Denver CO 80202 Denver CO 80202

Jeffrey Wright
Telecomm Resource
15 Lewis Drive
Lowman Idaho 83637

_____________________________
Douglas Bruce