Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Previous lessons, Labor standard benefits (special laws- paternity leave, RA 8187, Maternity leave benefits
(SSS), for Gov’t employees-married only under GSIS so solo parent’s act included unmarried government
employees RA 8972, RA 9710 special employee, RA 9262) Legislation benefits (retirement benefits, RA
8558, PD 626 Employee’s compensation act, EEC, SSS, GSIS, Pag-ibig benefits, PhilHealth benefits,
Permanent/Temporary Disability
Property- includes vested rights such as a perfected mining claim, perfected homestead or final judgement;
includes right to work and right to earn a living
Profession, trade, employment, calling is a property right and the wrongful interference therewith is an
actionable wring. Thus, Order of Preventive Suspension without opportunity to be heard-violates property right.
Security of tenure- no worker shall be dismissed except for just or authorized causes provided by law and after
due process. By the use of the term worker, it presupposes that all workers are entitled to security of tenure, no
matter what their status, position or term of employment. Be they probationary, casual, contractual, term
employee, piece rate, task basis, household help, etc
Two considerations: manner of dismissal (adherence to due process clause) and act of dismissal (just and
authorized cause)
12. Article III, Section 4: Freedom of Expression
No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
Kapatiran ng Manggagawa ng Camara v Camara Shoes (111 SCRA 478)- The right of freedom of expression
is applicable not only in times of labor dispute but during industrial peace to air valid grievances.
13. Article III, Section 8: Freedom of Association
The right of the people, including those employed in the public and private sectors to form unions, associations, or
societies for purposes not contrary to law shall not be abridged.
Right to join unions includes privilege not to join. Exception- when there is a Union Security Clause in the CBA,
provided that the USC shall be of prospective effect should a labor union opt to choose such USC in their CBA
and that the sanctions involved therein must be explicitly stated, and cannot be mere implied.
14. Article III, Section 10 in relation to Article 1700 and 1702 of the New Civil
Code: Non-impairment clause
No law impairing the obligations of contracts shall be passed.
Sanctity of employment contracts except in the exercise of police power. Contracts may be impaired as long as
such power is lawfully exercised.
Although the rights and duties arising from labor relationships are basically contractual in nature, these are not
covered by the general law on oblicon.
Art. 1700. The relations between capital and labor are not merely contractual. They are so impressed with public
interest that labor contracts must yield to the common good. Therefore, such contracts are subject to the special law
on labor unions, collective bargaining, strikes and lockouts, closed shop, wages, working conditions, hours of labor,
and similar subjects.
Art. 1702. In case of doubt, all labor legislation and all labor contracts shall be construed in favor of the safety and
decent living for the laborer.
15. Article III, Section 11: Free access to courts
Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and adequate legal assistance shall not be denied to any person
by reason of poverty.
Quasi-judicial bodies- like those having jurisdiction over labor cases: LA, NLRC, DOLE
16. Article III, Section 16: Right to speedy disposition of cases
All persons shall have the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-judicial, or
administrative bodies.
No filing fee or legal fee when filing grievances with the NLRC.
Zero backlog of dockets at NLRC.
17. Article III, Section 18 (2): Right against involuntary servitude
No involuntary servitude in any form shall exist except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been
duly convicted.
ii. POLICE POWER OF THE STATE
1. CONCEPT
2. RULE MAKING POWER OF THE DOLE SECRETARY (ART. 5 LC)
c. STATE’S POWER TO REGULATE
II. ELEMENTS OF LABOR LAWS
a. LABOR POLICIES
b. LABOR STANDARDS
c. LABOR RELATIONS LAW
d. SOCIAL LAW
III. COVERAGE AND APPLICABILITY OF THE LABOR CODE
a. RULE
i. IT APPLIES TO AGRICULTURAL AND NON-AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
b. EXCEPTIONS:
i. REGULAR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
ii. GOCCS
iii. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
iv. SPECIALIZED AGENCIES
IV. EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP
a. TEST OF ER-EE
i. Four-fold test:
1. Power of selection and engagement
2. Power of dismissal
3. Economic conditions or payment of wages
4. Power of control over employee’s conduct
a. Control over the means and manner of work done and over the results
of the work
b. Status of:
A. doctor hired as consultant or on part time retainer: Ramos v CA:
In other words, private hospitals, hire, fire and exercise real control
over their attending and visiting consultant staff. While consultants
are not, technically employees, a point which respondent hospital
asserts in denying all responsibility for the patients condition, the
control exercised, the hiring, and the right to terminate consultants
all fulfill the important hallmarks of an employer-employee
relationship, with the exception of the payment of wages. In
assessing whether such a relationship in fact exists, the control test is
determining. Accordingly, on the basis of the foregoing, we rule
that for the purpose of allocating responsibility in medical
negligence cases, an employer-employee relationship in effect exists
between hospitals and their attending and visiting physicians.
B. barbers,
C. jeepney drivers under boundary system,
D. drivers not considered field personnel,
E. insurance agents
b. CASES WHEN ER-EE EXISTS
c. METHOD OF COMPENSATION NOT DETERMINATIVE OF ER-EE
V. BASIC RIGHTS OF WORKERS
VI. RECENT JURISPRUDENCE
SSS ACT
Employer
-is any person, natural or juridical, domestic or foreign, who carries on in the Philippines any trade, business,
industry, undertaking or activity of any kind and uses the services of another person who is under his orders as
regards the employment
-a self-employed person shall be both employee and employer at the same time
Employee
- Any person who performs services for an employer in which either or both mental and physical efforts
are used and who receives compensation for such services, where there is an employer-employee
relationship
- Only natural persons (do not include juridical persons)
- A CORPORATION CANNOT BE AN EMPLOYEE
- A COOPERATIVE MEMBER CANNOT BE AN EMPLOYEE OF THE COOPERATIVE
GSIS
Employer
-the national government, its political subdivisions, branches, agencies or instrumentalities, including GOCCs and
financial institutions with original charters, the constitutional commissions and the judiciary
Employee
-Any person receiving compensation while in the service of an employer as defined herein, whether by election
of appointment, irrespective of status of appointment, including barangay and Sanggunian officials
POEA
Employer
-as any person, partnership or corporation, whether local or foreign, directly engaging the services of Filipino
workers overseas
Employee
-Migrant Workers or Overseas Filipino Workers, "a person to be engaged, is engaged, or has been engaged in
a remunerated activity in a state of which he or she is not a legal resident
TESDA (Technical Education and Skills Development Act of 1994) and its Implementing Rules
Employer
-the individual firm or any other entity qualified to hire apprentices under the Code. Thus, it cannot be an
individual, but must be an entity or a firm. And even granting that it is such a juridical person, it must be qualified
under the provisions of RA 7796
- (entity means juridical persons)
Employee
-trainees shall mean persons who are participants in a vocational, administrative or technical training program
for the purpose of acquiring and developing job-related skills
-apprentice is a person undergoing training for an approved apprenticeable occupation during an
apprenticeship agreement
-learners refers to persons hired as trainees in semi-skilled and other industrial occupations which are non-
apprenticeable. Leadership programs must be approved by the Authority.
Employer
-any person, partnership or association or corporation which, not being an employer, contracts with an
independent contractor for the performance of any work, job, task or project
Employee
- Contractual, project, fixed-term, seasonal, casual, on-call, task-based, piece rate workers, etc (Quiz
No. 1)
Employer
- Any person, natural or artificial, who for his account or benefit, or on behalf of any person residing
outside the country, directly or indirectly or through any employee, agent, contractor, sub-contractor or
any person
- Delivers or causes to be delivered any goods, articles or materials to be processed or fabricated in or
about a home and thereafter to be returned or to be disposed of or distributed in accordance with his
directions, or
- Sells any goods, articles or materials to be processed or fabricated in or about a home and then re-buys
them after such processing or fabrication, either himself or through some other person
Employee
- Art. 153. Employment of Homeworkers (DO No. 5 Feb. 4, 1991)
- Any person who performs industrial work for an employer, contractor or sub-contractor
- Industrial homework is a system of production under which work for an employer or contractor is carried
out by s homeworker at his home. Materials may or may not be furnished by the employer or contractor.
- These type of workers are governed by the provisions of DO No. 5 dated Feb. 1991
RA NO 10361 KASAMBAHAY LAW
Employer
- Refers to any person who engages and controls the services of a domestic worker and is party to the
employment contract
- Household refers to the immediate members of the family or the occupants of the house that are directly
provided services by the domestic worker
Employee
- Any person engaged in domestic work within an employment relationship such as, but not limited to the
following:
o General househelp
o Nursemaid or yaya
o Cook
o Gardener
o Laundry person
o But shall exclude any person who performs domestic work only occasionally or sporadically and
not on an occupational basis
- The term shall not include children who are under foster family arrangement, and are provided access to
education and given an allowance incidental to education i.e. baon, transportation, school projects and
school activities
CLASSIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES (3S+ 3H +4P + 2F= 3CLAM3) OR (F(2)L C(3)H(3)AM(3)p(4)S(3)
Seasonal Employees
- For seasonal employees to be excluded from those classified as regular employees, it is not enough that
they perform work that is seasonal in nature. They must have been employed only for the duration of one
season. If seasonal workers perform the same tasks for the employer every season for several years,
accumulating at least 12 months, they will be considered regular seasonal employees for their respective
tasks. Seasonal workers who are called to work from time to time and are temporarily laid off during
off-season are not separated from service, but merely considered on leave until re-employed.
- If the employee has been performing the job for at least a year, even if the performance is not
continuous and merely intermittent, the law deems repeated and continuing need for its performance as
sufficient evidence of the necessity if not indispensability of that activity to the business. Hence, the
employment is considered regular, but only with respect to such activity and while such activity exists.
- These workers as above-described are sometimes referred to a permanent or regular seasonal workers
- Examples: packers of tobacco hired by tobacco farms
Supervisory Employees
-Art. 212 (m). those, in the interest of the employer, effectively recommend such managerial actions if the
exercise of such authority is not merely routinary or clerical in nature but requires the use of independent
judgement
-IRR- Book 5, Sec 1 (1)
- not actually managerial since they do not lay down company policies; the exercise is not supreme but merely
advisory in character. Theirs is not a final determination of the company policies inasmuch as any action taken by
them on matters relative to hiring, promotion, transfer, suspension, and termination of employees is still subject to
confirmation and approval by their respective superior
-thus where such power, which is in effect recommendatory in character, is subject to evaluation, review and final
action by the department heads and other higher executives of the company,…
SPECIAL GROUP OF WORKERS
1. Handicapped Workers
- RA 7277 THE MAGNA CARTA FOR DISABLED PERSONS
- RA 9442
- SEC. 5 INCENTIVES FOR EMPLOYERS (incentive for handicapped workers)
Women Workers
- Article (di mabasa)- nightworkers (workers in night clubs, cocktail lounges, beer house, massage clinic, bar
or similar establishments) with or without compensation, under the effective control and supervision of the
owner are employees
- RA 8972 Solo Parents Welfare Act of 2000 (parental leave and flexible work schedule)
- Department Order No 112A (special leave benefit for women)
- Discrimination Against Women: unlawful to deny any women employee the benefits provided for in the
law to discharge any woman employed by him for the purpose of preventing her from enjoying any of
the benefits provided under the Labor Code and other laws; to discharge such woman on account of her
pregnancy, or while on leave or in confinement due to her pregnancy; to discharge or refuse the
admission of such woman upon returning to her work for fear that she may again be pregnant;
- RA 10151: An Act Allowing the Employment of Night Workers- Article 158
- Art. 161 Night Work Schedule
Bus-Drivers and Conductors
-DO no. 118-12 s 2012
Security Guards
TV and Movie Industry
Debt Collectors
Construction
Business Processing Outsourcing
Knowledge Outsource Processing
Lecture 7/9/2018
WHO CAN FORM LABOR ORGANIZATIONS?
Supervisory employees
- Cannot join unions of rank-and-file employees, but may form, assist or join labor organizations of their
own. Those who were members of existing labor organizations upon the effectivity of RA 6715 (as of
March 1989) were explicitly authorized to remain under its Implementing Rules (Arizala v CA 189 SCRA
584; COASTAL SUBIC TERMINAL INC., vs DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EMPLOYMENT- OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY, COASTAL SUBIC BAY TERMINAL, INC. SUERVISORY UNION-APSOTEU, and COASTAL SUBIC
BAY TERMINAL, INC. RANK-AND-FILE UNION-ALU-TUCP, GR NO. 157117, November 20, 2006; See
however Sec 8 RA 9481 s of 2007)
Rank-and-file employees
- Whether employed for a definite period or not, beginning on their first day of service (art. 217 LC)
Aliens
-working in this country with valid employment permits, if they are nationals of a country which grants the same
or similar rights to Filipino Workers (Art. 269, LC). The law allows them to join or assist (but not from) labor
organizations of their own choosing for purposes of collective bargaining
Government employees
- In the civil service (Art. III, Sec. 8, Phil Const.; Art. 245, LC as amended by EO No. 111; Sec. 2, EO 180)
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES’RIGHT TO ORGANIZE AND ITS LIMITATIONS
Considering the fact that government employees can now organize their own labor organizations, the
following discourse of the Honorable Supreme Court on the matter would be most informative, if not, the
yardstick to be followed on the matter.
NOTE: Limitations: See Arizala et al v CA et al GR No. L-43633-34 September 14, 1990) High level employees
whose functions are considered policy-making, managerial or highly confidential in nature, are not eligible to join
organizations of rank-and-file government employees. This right does not apply to members of the AFP, including
police officers, policemen, firemen and jail guards (Sec 3 and 4, EO No. 180)
Employees of government corporations established under the Corporation Code(Art. 245, LC as amended by EO
No. 222)
Security Personnel
-who are employees in relation to the establishment of their employer (company guards). Ex. O. No. 111
eliminated the provision of Art. 245 of the Code regarding ineligibility of security personnel. And the prohibition
embodied under the IRR was held to be germane to the objectives and purposes of RA 6715 and EO No 111
(Meralco v Sec of Labor, 197 SCRA 275). Thus, they may join either supervisory or rank-and-file unions
according to their rank
WHO CANNOT FORM LABOR UNIONS? (SP CAME)
Subversives or Members of Subversive Organizations
- No labor organizations shall knowingly admit as members or continue in membership any individual who
belongs to subversive organization or who is engaged directly or indirectly in any subversive activity (Art.
241e LC)
Protection Services
- these include members of the Philippine Armed Forces, the Philippine National Police, security agency
guards as to the union of their principals
Cooperative’s employees who are at the same time members
- this is because members of the cooperative are deemed owners of such cooperatives, and owners cannot
bargain with themselves nor with their co-owners (San Jose City Electric Cooperative v Minister of Labor,
173 SCRA 697; BENECO v Ferrer-Calleja, 180 SCRA 740). But this exclusion does not apply to
employees of cooperatives who are not members or co-owners thereof (Cooperative Rural Bank of
Davao City v Ferrer-Calleja, 165 SCRA 725). While employees who are at the same time members of a
cooperative cannot join labor unions for purposes of collective bargaining, they are not however
prohibited from withdrawing their membership in the cooperative in order to join a labor union. Public
policy provides that the right to self-organization be accorded the highest consideration (Central Negros
Electric Cooperative, Inc. v Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment, et. al. GR No 94045
18 September 1991)
Aliens
- those without any diplomatic ties with the Philippines, or of countries who do not adhere to the principal
of reciprocity as to these rights of laborers
Managerial employees
- those vested with powers or prerogatives to lay down and execute management policies and/or hire,
transfer, suspend, lay-off, recall, discharge, assign, or discipline employees. They are distinguished from
the supervisory employees who, in the interest of the employer, effectively recommend such managerial
actions if the exercise of such authority is not merely routinary or clerical in nature, but requires the use of
independent judgement (Art. 212-m LC)
- accordingly, Art. 212 m of the LC as amended, differentiates supervisory employees from managerial
employees, to wit: supervisory employees are those who, in the interest of the employer, effectively
recommend such managerial actions, if the exercise of such authority is not merely routinary or clerical in
nature but requires the use of independent judgement, whereas, managerial employees are those who
are vested with powers or prerogatives to lay down and execute management policies and/or hire,
transfer, suspend, lay-off, recall, discharge, assign or discipline employees (Cathay Pacific Steel Corp. v
CA)
Employees who may be excluded by a CBA
-classifies union and non-union members, such as those who have access to confidential information of the
employer (Accountants- accounting personnel, radio/telegraph operators (Golden Farms v Ferrer-Calleja 175
SCRA 471) Secretaries- (Philips Industrial Devt v NLRC 210 SCRA 339) Analogous to these are the present
highly skilled computer technicians, programmer and program developers, encoders, etc who have access and
come to deal with the highest confidential data of their employer)
LABOR STANDARDS
LABOR LAW
Defined as that body of statutes, rules and doctrines that defines State policies on labor and employment, and
governs the rights and duties of workers and employers respecting terms and conditions of employment by
prescribing certain standards therefor, or by establishing a legal framework within which better terms and
conditions of work could be obtained through collective bargaining or other concerted activity
This definition is now in accordance with the provisions of the new Philippine Constitution and the Labor Code as
amended
LABOR POLICIES
These are principles or guidelines that define State policies regarding labor and employment. Although these
policies do not govern the relations, per se, between workers and employees, they represent a new dimension
that is an integral part of labor law
Labor policies may be classified into
a. Constitutional Policies- Art. XIII Sec 3
b. Statutory Policies- Books I and II LC
LABOR STANDARDS LAW
- Minimum requirements prescribed by existing laws, rules and regulations and other issuances relating to
wages, hours of work, cost of living allowances and other monetary and welfare benefits (Section 7, Rule
1, Rules on the Disposition of Labor Standards Cases in the Regional Offices, Sept 16, 1987)
- In is that body of statutes, rules and doctrines that governs the rights and duties of workers and
employers respecting terms and conditions of employment by prescribing certain standards therefor.
These are embodied in Book III Labor Code and in the decrees on COLA and 13th month pay.
- These are those which pertain to conditions of employment such as working conditions, rest periods and
minimum wages, to health, safety and social welfare benefits such a medical, dental and occupational
safety, employee’s compensation and medicare and to the employee’s right to security of tenure.
Basic Definitions
1. Normal hours of work: 8 hours a day (Article 83 LC)
Broken hours- the normal 8 hours do not always mean continuous and uninterrupted; it may mean broken
hours as in 4 hours in the morning and 4 hours in the evening, provided the total of 8 hours is accomplished within
one work day
Staggered working time- in Christmas seasons is a valid scheme meant to improve the delivery of goods
and services (Memo Circular No 81)
Work in different shifts- three 8 hour shifts in a “work day”
Flexible Work Schedule- is a right granted to a solo parent employee to vary his/her arrival and
departure time without affecting the core work hours as defined by the employer (Sec. 3(3) and 6 RA 8972)
Work day- 24 consecutive hour from the time the employee starts to work
Work week- 168 consecutive hours or 7 consecutive 24 hr work days, beginning at the same hour and on
the same calendar day each calendar week
Travel-as part of the employee’s principal activity is counted as hours worked
Travel away from home- is working time when it cuts across the employee’s workday
Attendance in hearings of cases- filed by employees against the employers is not compensable working
time
2. Compressed Work Week (CWW)- from 6 days to 5 days under certain conditions imposed by DOLE (less
than 6 days but 48 hrs per week) (Department Order No. 02, Series of 2004- implementing CWW
schemes)
Requisites: AN NoTe Mo
- Agreement
- No diminution of pay and fringe benefits
- No strenuous physical exertion and with adequate rest periods
- Temporary
- More benefits or equal to 1-hour OT
- Purpose: PEG
- Promote business competitiveness and productivity
- Ensure safety and health of employees
- Give flexibility in fixing hours of work for a balanced work life
3. Meal break- mandatory 60 minutes (Article 85, LC)
- Meal breaks can be shortened to not less than 20 minutes with compensation in: NENA
o Non-manual work
o Establishment operates not less than 16 hours a day
o Necessary to prevent serious loss of perishable goods
o Actual or impending emergencies
- Rest periods of short duration during working hours are considered and counted as compensable working
time (Article 84 LC)
- Rest periods or coffee breaks from 5-20 minutes are compensable working time (Section 7 Rule 1 Book
III, Rules to Implement the LC)
4. Waiting time
- Waiting time spent by an employee shall be considered as working time if waiting is an integral part of
his work or the employee is required or engaged by the employer to wait (Section 5a, Rule I Book III,
Rules to Implement the LC)
- Engaged to wait- compensable and must be paid
- Waiting to be engaged- non-compensable, no pay
- An employee who is required to remain on call in the employer’s premises or so close thereto that he
cannot use the time effectively and gainfully for his own purpose, shall be considered as working while on
call (Sec 5b, Rule I, Book III, Rule to Implement the LC)
5. Wages (Art. 98, Rule VII, Sec 3)
- Remuneration or earnings capable of being expressed in terms of motion, whether fixed or ascertained
on a time, task, piece or commission basis, or other method of calculating the same, which is payable by
an employer to an employee under a written or unwritten contract of employment for work done or to be
done or for services rendered or to be rendered and includes rendered or to be rendered and includes
the fair and reasonable value as determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment, of board,
lodging, or other facilities customarily furnished by the employer to the employee (Art. 97 LC)
- Attributes of wage: FURE
o Fair and reasonable value
o Under a written or unwritten contract
o Remuneration or earnings
o Expressed in terms of money
Statutory minimum wage- lowest basic wage rate fixed by law, that an employer can pay his workers
Regional minimum wage- lowest basic wage rate that an employer can pay his workers, as fixed by the
RTWPB and which shall not be lower than the applicable statutory minimum wage rates. The minimum wage rates
for agricultural and non-agricultural employees and workers in each and every region of the country shall be
those prescribed by the RTWPB (Art. 99 LC)
- Localities, industries, and provinces
What are the criteria or standards for minimum wage fixing? (Art. 124 LC DEFINE Wa Pre Co Ne)
- Demand for living wages
- Effects on employment generation and family income
- Fair return of the capital invested and employer’s capacity to pay
- Improvements in standards of living
- Needs of workers and their families
- Equitable distribution of income and wealth
- Wage adjustment
- Prevailing wage levels
- Cost of living and changes or increases
- Need to induce industries to invest in the countryside
How are wage rates established by DOLE?
Wage rates established by DOLE through: TIC
- Time and motion studies
- Individual/ collective bargaining agreement
- Consultation with employee representatives or organizations
6. Commissions (Art. 97)
-recompense, compensation or reward of an employee, agent, salesman, executor, trustee, receiver, factor,
broker, or bailee, when the same is calculated as percentage or the amount of his transactions or on the profit of
the principal given for extra efforts exerted in consummating sales or other related transactions. They are
additional pays which do not form part of the basic salary/wage, therefore, they should not be included in
computing the 13th month pay
07-10-2018
STANDARDS BENEFITS (13 GHOST WARNS: Be Forever Vigilant, Silently (Meditate, Pray) Sincerely
A. 13TH MONTH PAY (13 GHOST WARNS: Be Forever Vigilant, Silently (Meditate, Pray) Sincerely)
-Is 1/12th of the basic salary earned by an employee within a calendar year.
-to be paid only to rank-and-file employees, provided that they have worked for at least one month during a
calendar year
Note: earnings and other remunerations which are not part of the basic salary, such as payments for vacation
and sick leave, overtime pay, and premium for work on rest days, are not included in the computation of the 13th
month pay. The COLA is not also included
The rule on 13th month pay
-requires an employer to pay its employees receiving a basic salary of more than P1,000 regardless of the
nature of their employment, a 13th month pay not later than Dec. 24, every year, provided that they have
worked at least one month during the calendar year (PD 851)
-however, an employer may give to his employees ½ thereof before the opening of the regular school year and
the remaining half on or before Dec 24 of every year. The frequency of payment of this monetary benefit may
be the subject of an agreement between the employer and the recognized collective bargaining agent of the
employees.
B. GRATUITY (13 GHOST WARNS: Be Forever Vigilant, Silently (Meditate, Pray) Sincerely)
- A gift, in cash or in kind, freely given by the employer in appreciation of certain favors or services
rendered, which may not even be essential or necessary to the business.
- Not part of wages since strictly speaking, it is not intended as compensation for actual work
- Not demandable as a matter of right
- Given by employer through his liberality, his appreciation, solely on his discretion, and not necessarily to
all employees at all times
C. HOLIDAY PAY (13 GHOST WARNS: Be Forever Vigilant, Silently (Meditate, Pray) Sincerely)
The purpose of Holiday Pay
-it is meant to prevent diminution of the income of workers on account of work interruptions
10 regular holidays (EO 203 June 30 1987)
1. January 1: new year’s day
2. Maundy Thursday: varies
3. Good Friday: varies
4. Araw ng Kagitingan (Bataan Day and Corregidor Day): Monday nearest April 9
5. Labor Day: Monday nearest May 1
6. Independence Day: Monday nearest June 12
7. National Heroes Day: Last Sunday of August
8. Bonifacio Day: Monday nearest November 30
9. Christmas Day: December 25
10. Rizal Day: Monday nearest December 30
There are 2 national special days: November 1: All Saints Day and December 31: last day of the year
Under PD 1083 (Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines) effective Feb 4, 1977, the following are
recognized as legal Muslim Holidays:
AmunJadid (New Year)- 1st day of the first lunar month of Muharram
Maulid-un Nabi (Birthday of the Prophet Muhammad)- 12th day of the 3rd lunar month of Rabi-ul-Awwal
LailatulIsraWalMi’raj (Nocturnal Journey and Ascension of the Prophet Muhammad)- 27th day of the 7th lunar
monthly of Rajab
These are observed in the provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Norte and Sur, Maguindanao, North Cotabato,
Sultan Kudarat, Sulu, cities of Cotabato, Iligan, Marawi, Pagadian and Zamboanga. These are also
observed in some Muslim provinces and cities may be created by law. These can be observed in some other
cities and provinces if and when so proclaimed by the President.
Id-ulFtr(Hari Raya Pausa)- 1st day of the 10th lunar month of Shawwal, commemorating the end of the fasting
season;
Id-ulAdha (Hari Raya Haji)- 10th day of the 12th lunar month of Dhu’l-Hijja
Article 9. Right to holiday pay.- Sec 3. Holiday pay.-
(a) Every worker shall be paid his regular daily Every employer shall pay his employee their
wage during regular holidays, except in regular daily wage for any unworked regular
retain and service establishments regularly holiday.
employing less than 10 workers; As used in the Rule, the term holiday shall
(b) The employer may require an employee to exclusively refer to: New Year’s Day, Maundy
work on any holiday but such employee shall Thursday, Good Friday, 9th of April, 1st of May,
be paid a compensation equivalent to 2x his 12th of June, 4th of July, 30th of November, 25th and
regular rate 30th of December and the day designated by law
for a general election or national referendum or
plebiscite
Where there are 2 successive regular holidays, like Holy Thursday and Good Friday ,an employee may not be
paid for both holidays if he absents himself from work on the day immediately preceding the first holiday, unless
he works on the first holiday in which case he is entitled to his holiday pay on the second holiday (Sec 10 Rule IV
Book HI Implementing Rules and Regulations)
Thus, where the employee is absent without permission on Wednesday, the day immediately preceding the first
holiday, Maundy Thursday, he is not thereof entitled to the holiday pay for either Maundy Thursday or Good
Friday. However, where the employee was absent with pay on Wednesday or did not report for work because
it was his rest day, he would be entitled to holiday pay. Employees who are on leave of absence with pay are
entitled to holiday pay. And where the day immediately preceding the holiday is scheduled rest day of the
employee, he shall be deemed to be on leave of absence on that day, in which case, he shall be entitled to the
holiday pay if he worked on the day immediately preceding the rest day ( Sec. 6 Rule IV Book HI Implementing
Rules and Regulations)
What are the 2 classes of special public holidays?
-Nationwide special public holiday and the local special public holiday. Under LOI 814, local special public
holidays are non-working days except when otherwise declared by the President.
What are the distinctions between regular holidays and special days?
a. A covered employee who does not work during regular holidays is paid 100% of his regular daily
wage; while a covered employee who does not work during a special day does not receive any
compensation under the principle of “no work no pay”
b. A covered employee who works during regular holidays is paid 200% of his regular daily wage; while a
covered employee who works during special days is only paid an additional compensation of not less
than 30% of the basic pay or a total of 130% and at least 50% over and above the basic pay or a
total of 150% if the worker is permitted or suffered to work on special days which fall on his scheduled
rest day
What are the effects of absence on entitlement to regular holiday pay?
a. Employees on leave of absence with pay- entitled to regular holiday pay
b. Employees on leave of absence without pay on the day immediately preceding a regular holiday-may
not be paid the required holiday pay if he has not worked on such regular holiday
c. Employees on leave while on SSS or employee’s compensation benefits-employers shall grant the same
percentage of the holiday pay as the benefit granted by competent authority in the form of employee’s
compensation or social security payment, whichever is higher, if they are not reporting for work while on
such benefits.
d. When the day preceding regular holiday is a non-working day or scheduled rest day- employee shall
not be deemed to be on leave of absence on that day, in which case, he shall be entitled to the regular
holiday pay if he worked on the day immediately preceding the non-working day or rest day
What is the rule in case of absence during successive regular holidays?
An employee may not be paid for both holidays if he absents himself from work on the day immediately
preceding the first holiday, unless he works on the first holiday, in which case, he is entitled to his holiday pay
on the second holiday
What is the rule in case two regular holidays fall on the same day?
DOLE Explanatory Bulletin on Worker’s Entitlement to Holiday Pay (April 9, 1993):
if Araw ng Kagitingan and Good Friday fall on the same day
- if employee did not work- 200% of basic pay
- If employee worked- 300% of basic pay
What is the rule in case of regular Muslim holidays?
The SC ruled that there should be no distinction between Muslim and non-Muslims as regards payment of
benefits for Muslim holidays
D. OVERTIME PAY (13GHOST WARNS: Be Forever Vigilant, Silently (Meditate, Pray) Sincerely)
-an additional compensation for work done beyond the normal work hours on ordinary working days. Premium
pay, on the other hand, is additional compensation for work rendered by the employee on days normally he
should not be working, such as special holidays and weekly rest days
Art. 87. Overtime work Sec.8 Overtime Pay
Work may be performed beyond 8 hours a day provided that Any employee covered by this rule who is
the employee is paid for the overtime work, an additional permitted or required to work beyond 8 hrs
compensation equivalent to his regular wage plus at least 25% on ordinary working days shall be paid an
thereof. additional compensation for the overtime
Work performed beyond 8 hrs a day on a holiday or rest day work in an amount equivalent to his regular
shall be paid an additional compensation equivalent to the rate wage plus at least 25% thereof.
of the first 8 hrs on a holiday or rest day plus at least 30%
hereof
F-I-N-A-L-S C-O-V-E-R-A-G-E
A Synopsis
- For a long period of time, the agrarian system of Philippines was being controlled by the large
landlords. The small farmers in Philippines were struggling for their rights to land and other natural
resources.
- Implementation of Agrarian Reform in Philippines. The implementation of Agrarian reforms proceeded a
very slow pace. This was due to the lack of political will. The redistribution of land was also very slow.
- Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law: Philippines (RA 6657) alternatively called the Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform law was signed by President Corazon Aquino on 10th June, 1988. The CARL is
responsible for the implementation of the CARP in Philippines. The law focused on industrialization in
Philippines together with social justice.
- While there is significant empirical evidence that agrarian reform has yielded significant benefits and
has the potential for even greater benefits, the fact is that it has encountered implementation problems.
Regardless of the problems encountered by CARP, the point is that CARP is not the cause of the continuing
poverty nor the obstacle to solving it. On the contrary, completing CARP in accordance with the mandate
of the Constitution is a necessary condition to correct social injustice, and achieve sound agricultural
development and economic growth.
Social Security System, Government Security Insurance System, Employees Compensation Commission
DIFFERENCES
ECC SSS GSIS
Work-related illness or Occurrence of contingency whether Occurrence of
BASIS injury or not work-connected contingency whether or
not work-connected
EMPLOYEE
Not over 60 yrs of age Compulsory Compulsory
Over 60 years but -all employees not over 60 yrs -all persons who have
paying contributions to including: reached the compulsory
qualify for retirement or Domestics retirement age,
life insurance Self-employed irrespective of
Individual farmers and fisherfolk employment status
COVERAGE Partners and sole-proprietors Except
Actors/actresses Members of AFP and
News correspondents/scriptwriters PNP
Professional athletes, coaches, Contractuals who have no
trainers and jockeys ee-er relationship with
Voluntary agency serviced
-OFWs
-spouse devoting fulltime managing
household affairs (unless engages in
vocation subject to mandatory
coverage)
EMPLOYER
All employers Employers in private sector All government agencies
(private/public) and instrumentalities
including GOCCs
DEFINITION OF Any person compulsorily -Any person who performs services Any person receiving
EMPLOYEE covered by GSIS or SSS for an employer in which physical compensation while in the
(best definition of Any person employed and/or mental efforts are used and service of an employer,
an employee is as casual, emergency, who receives compensation for such whether by election or
with the SSS) temporary, substitute or services, where there is an ee-er appointment, irrespective
Casual employee contractual relationship of status of appointment,
may include task- -Self-employed is both employer including barangay and
based employees and employee sanggunian officials
(not long term), THE FOLLOWING, however, are not COMPENSATION is
considered employment: defined as basic pay or
-purely casual employment salary received
-service on alien vessel outside excluding:
Philippines -per diems
-government service -bonuses
-service for foreign organization or -OT pay
government -honoraria
-other services of temporary and -allowances
other employees excluded by SSC -other emoluments in
addition to basic pay not
integrated in basic pay
DEFINITION OF Any person employing Any person who carries on in the The national government,
EMPLOYER services of employee Philippines any trade, business, its political subdivisions,
(7 definitions of (whether private or industry or undertaking or activity branches, agencies or
employer-including public sector) and uses services of another who is instrumentalities, including
other entities) under his orders as regards the GOCCs and financial
employment except government or institutions with original
GOCCs (thus, relates only to private charters, the constitutional
sector employment) commissions and judiciary
(public sector
employment)
BENEFICIARIES Primary: dependent Primary: Primary:
spouse until he -dependent spouse until he -legal dependent spouse
remarries; dependent remarries until he/she remarries
children -dependent legitimate, legitimated, -dependent children
Secondary: dependent legally adopted or illegitimate Secondary:
parents, illegitimate children (gets only 50% share of -dependent parents
children and legitimate legitimate or adopted ones unless -legitimate descendants
descendants (subject to there are no legitimate or adopted subject to restriction on
restrictions on children) dependent children
dependent children) Secondary: dependent parents
Tertiary: any person designated as
beneficiary by the employee
DEPENDENTS -legitimate, legitimated, - legitimate, legitimated, legally - legitimate, legitimated,
Case law: common legally adopted or adopted or illegitimate child who is legally adopted or
law wife not legal acknowledged natural unmarried, not gainfully employed, illegitimate child who is
spouse was the child who is unmarried, not over 21 yrs of age or if over unmarried, not gainfully
recipient of the SSS not gainfully employed, 21, incapable of self-support due to employed, not over 21
benefit in a mining not over 21 yrs of age physical/mental defect which is yrs of age or if over 21,
case bec. Marriage or if over 21, incapable congenital or acquired during incapable of self-support
with legal spouse of self-support due to minority due to physical/mental
was void ab initio physical/mental defect -legal spouse entitled by law to defect which is congenital
(14y/o) which is congenital or receive support from member or acquired during
acquired during minority -parents who are receiving regular minority
-legitimate spouse living support from member -legitimate spouse
with employee dependent for support
-parents of employee on member
wholly dependent on -parents dependent for
him for regular support support on member
BENEFITS -temporary total -permanent total disability -temporary total
disability -permanent partial disability disability
-permanent total -death benefit -permanent total
disability -funeral benefit disability
-permanent partial -sickness benefit -permanent partial
disability -retirement benefit disability
-death benefit -maternity benefit (as amended by -survivorship benefit
-funeral benefit RA 7322) -funeral benefit
-medical benefits -retirement benefit
-rehabilitation services -separation benefit
-unemployment or
involuntary separation
benefit
-insurance-compulsory or
optional
ENTITLEMENT TO None Member has reached age of 60 Optional: member meets
RETIREMENT (optional) or 65 (compulsory) ff:
BENEFITS -has worked for at least
15 yrs
-is at least 60yrs of age
at time of retirement
-not receiving monthly
pension benefit from
permanent total
disability
Compulsory: member is
65y/o with at least 15
yrs of service (if service is
less than 15 yrs, he may
be allowed to continue in
accordance with Civil
Service Rules and
Regulations)
DISABILITIES -temporary disability -complete loss of sight in both eyes -complete loss of sight in
DEEMED lasting over 120 days -loss of 2 limbs at or above the both eyes
PERMANENT -Complete loss of sight ankle or writs -loss of 2 limbs at or
TOTAL in both eyes -permanent complete paralysis above the ankle or writs
-loss of 2 limbs at or -brain injury resulting in incurable -permanent complete
above ankle or wrist imbecility or insanity paralysis
-permanent complete -other cases determined by SSS -brain injury resulting in
paralysis of 2 limbs incurable imbecility or
-brain injury resulting in insanity
incurable imbecility -other cases determined
-other cases determined by GSIS
by medical director of
SSS
SYSTEM EXCUSED For all contingencies in: -for permanent disability,
FROM LIABILITY -intoxication in the ff:
-willful intent to injure or -grave misconduct
kill oneself or another -notorious negligence
-notorious negligence -willful intent to kill
oneself or another
-habitual intoxication
DISABILITIES Complete and Complete and permanent loss of use Complete and permanent
DEEMED permanent loss of use of of a digit, limb, ear or both ears, loss of use of a digit,
PERMANENT a digit, limb, ear or hearing in one or both ears, or sight limb, ear or both ears,
PARTIAL both ears, hearing in in one eye hearing in one or both
one or both ears, or ears, or sight in one eye
sight in one eye
FUNERAL BENEFIT 20k 20k 20k
WHO PAYS employer Employer and employee Employer and employee
REMITTANCE
NOTICE Employee to notify Employee to notify employer within
REQUIREMENT employer within 5 days 5 days from injury or illness (unless
from injury or illness it is no longer necessary under the
(unless it is no longer exceptions)
necessary under the Employer to notify SSS within 5
exceptions) days from notice
Employer to record the
same in logbook within
5 days from notice
Employer to notify
SSS/GSIS within 5 days
from recording in
logbook
EFFECT OF SSS absolved unless Legal and eligible
ERRONEOUS notified of other claim claimant may still
PAYMENT prior to payment demand benefits, without
prejudice to right of
GSIS to sue improper
claimant
DISPUTE File claims with File claim with SSS File claim with GSIS
SETTLEMENT SSS/GSIS Appeal to SS Commission Appeal to GSIS Board
Appeal to ECC Appeal to CA Appeal to CA
Appeal to CA Appeal to SC Appeal to SC
Appeal to SC
*dependents: (compare with the definition of dependents under the family code- some members under the FC are not included,
Question? Are they excluded from the dependents under the SSS, GSIS, ECC?)
Which prevails between SSS and Civil Code? SSS. Civil code and family code are general laws, SSS pertains to employees and a
special law. If harmonization is possible, SSS exception to the general law.
Appeal completed case docketed medical/legal evaluation review committee on technical evaluation
appeal given due course ECC action decision
If decision: a. not favorable to employee petition for review to SC
If b. favorable to employee final and executory
Compensable work-related injuries and occupational diseases
- in the course of employment, there is always the risk of being injured or acquiring disease. In most cases,
these are not given attention either by employer or employee. In some instances, the employee just
applies home remedies or goes to medical practitioner and shoulders expenses. Meanwhile, he gets
absent from work, thus having no income. There are rare instances however when the employer either
shoulders all the expenses or at least part of it and considers the employee to be on leave. The usual
practice of an employer however is to advance the funds for the medical treatment of the employee, and
later deducts the same from the wages of the laborer. There is always that policy of no care on the part
of the employer, and the fear of being dismissed from his work on the part of the employee.
Class on Saturday- nov. 10 and Sunday- nov. 11- 4pm onwards
November 10, 2018 lecture
Meaning of “arising out of”and “in the course of” the employment
- the two components of the coverage formula- arising out of and in the course of employment- are said to
be separate tests which must be independently satisfied; however, it should not be forgotten that the
basic concept of compensation coverage is unitary, not dual, and is best expressed in the word, “work
connection”. An uncompromising insistence on an independent application of each of the two portions of
the test can, in certain cases, exclude clearly work-connected injuries.
- The words “arising out of” refer to the origin or cause of the accident and are descriptive of its character,
while the words “in the course of” refer to the time, place, and circumstances under which the accident
takes place.
Two Views
- The more conservative view is that the causative risk or danger must be inherent in or essentially
connected with the employment itself.
- The more liberal view states that an injury may be regarded as arising out of the employment if it results
from a risk or danger to which the workman is exposed by reason of being engaged in the performance
of his duties, although such danger is not inherent in and has no necessary or essential connection with the
particular employment. This is more in conformity with the statement that an accident arises out of the
employment if it ensues from a risk reasonably incident to the employment, and if it is in some sense due
to the employment. Under this view, an injury arises out of the employment if the employment is one of
the contributing causes without which the accident which actually happened would not have happened.
Application of the rule to seafarers
- Under the 2000 Amended Employment Contract, work-related injury is defined as an injury(ies) resulting
in disability or death arising out of and in the course of employment. Thus, there is a need to show that
the injury resulting to disability or death must arise (1) out of employment and (2) in the course of
employment
- Clearly, to be entitled for death compensation benefits from the employer, the death of the seafarer (1)
must be work-related; and (2) must happen during the term of the employment contract. Under the
Amended POEA Contract, work-relatedness is now an important requirement. The qualification that
death must be work-related had made it necessary to show a causal connection between a seafarer’s
work and his death to be compensable.
Proximate Cause
- what is termed in American cases the proximate cause, is the sufficient cause, which may be the most remote of
an operation chain. It must be that which sets the others in motion and is to be distinguished from a mere pre-
existing condition upon which the effective cause operates, and must have been adequate to produce the
resultant damage without the intervention of an independent cause.
The “ingress-egress/ proximity” Rule
- the general rule in workmen’s compensation law known as the “going and coming rule”, simply stated, is
that “in the absence of special circumstances, an employee injured in, going to, or coming from, his place
of work is excluded from the benefits of workmen’s compensation acts.
- this rule, however, admits four well-recognized exceptions, to wit:
1. where the employee is proceeding to or from his work on the premises of his employer
2. where the employee is about to enter or about to leave the premises of the employer by way of
exclusive or customary means of ingress or egress
3. where the employee is charged, while on his way to or from his place of employment or at his home,
or during his employment, with some duty or special errand connected with his employment
4. and where the employer as an incident of the employment, provides the means of transportation to
and from the place of employment.
Employment includes not only the actual doing of the work but a reasonable margin of time and space
necessary to be used in passing to and from the place where the work is to be done. If the employee be injured
while passing, with the express of implied consent of the employer, to or from his work by a way over the
employer’s premises, or over those of another in such proximity and relation as to be in practical effect a part of
the employer’s premises, the injury is one arising out and in the course of the employment as much as though it
had happened while the employee was engaged in his work at the place of its performance.
In other words, the employment may begin in point of time before the work is entered upon and in point of space
before the place where the work is to be done is reached. Probably, as a general rule, employment may be
said to begin when the employee reaches the entrance to the employer’s premises where the work is to be done;
but it is clear that in some cases the rule extends to include the adjacent premises used by the employee as
means of ingress and egress with the express or implied consent of the employer.
The Laws as actually applied
1. accident on the way to work
Alano v EEC GR No. L-48594 March 16, 1988
2. accident on the way home
Lazo v EEC GR No. 78617, June 18, 1990
3. injury at place of employment not necessary element of compensability
- where an employee is constantly or occasionally on the street in connection with his work, accidents
thereon befalling him are compensable as “arising out of” the employment. As soon as it is established
that the work itself involves exposures to the perils of the streets. The workman can recover for any injury
so occasioned. The fact the risk may be common to all mankind does not disentitle a workman to
compensation if in particular case it arises out of the employment
- in fine, the general rule is that the accident should have occurred at a place of work and this is known as
the “direct premises rule”.
Exceptions to the “Direct Premises Rule”
- the previously discussed “coming and going rule” and the “ingress-egress/proximity rule” are just two of
the exceptions
4. incidents of employment
-it is settled that injuries sustained in connection with acts which are reasonably incidental to the
employment are deemed as arising out of such employment. Generally, such incidents of work include:
a) acts of personal ministration for the comfort or convenience of the employee
b) acts for the benefit of the employer
c) acts done to further the goodwill of the business
d) slight deviation from work, from curiosity or otherwise and
e) acts in emergencies
Acts of Ministration: Personal Comfort Doctrine
- acts performed by an employee within the time and space limits of his/her employment to minister to
personal comfort, such as satisfaction of his/her thirst, hunger or other physical demands, or to protect
himself/herself from excessive cold, shall be deemed incidental to his/her employment and injuries the
employee suffered in the performance of such acts shall be considered compensable and arising out of
and in the course of employment.
Rest or Refreshment
- the general rule is that injuries occurring to an employee during an intermission or break for rest or
refreshment arise in the course of the employment and are compensable. Such rule is not affected by the
fact the employee is paid by the hour and receives no pay for the period covered by such intermission.
Whether an employee, by resting during working hours, departs from, abandons, or breaks his
employment so as to deprive himself of the right to compensation for an injury sustained while so resting
generally depends upon whether such resting, in view of all the circumstances, is reasonably incident to
the employment. The fact that an employee unintentionally falls asleep while he is resting at a proper
time and place does not necessarily deprive him of the right to compensation for an injury received while
so sleeping, upon the ground that he has thereby departed from the course of his employment, except,
perhaps, where his duties are of such nature as to require him to remain awake, as in the case of a
watchman.
Lunch Period
- in a number of cases, it has been held that an injured workman is entitled to compensation for injuries
received on the employer’s premises, although the accident occurred during lunch period when work was
not actively in progress, where the eating of the lunch on the premises was with the employer’s
knowledge and consent, express or implied. According to some authorities, however, an injury to an
employee during meal hours is not compensable if it results from an independent act of the employee
having no connection with his work or his meal, or if the employee at the time was in a place where he
had no right to be.
Note:
Union Meeting during Lunch Period
- it has been held that an injury received at a union meeting held during a lunch period at the plant for the
purpose of electing a shop steward, the shop steward system being recognized by the employer in its
contract with the union, was not an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.
While Doing Work at Home
- injuries sustained by an employee at his own home or upon his own premises, in correction with the
performance of the duties of his employment, are generally held to be compensable where such work is
done there pursuant to the terms of the contract, express or implied, or pursuant to the direction or
request of the employer, but not where it is performed voluntarily by the employee for his own
convenience of benefit.
Extra-premises Rule
- the extra-premises rule is otherwise called the “shuttle bus” rule. This rule is the same as that in the old
workmen’s compensation jurisprudence, where the company which provides the means of transportation in
going to and coming from the place of work is liable for the injury sustained by employees while on
board said means of transportation. This is because the company vehicle is an extension of its premises.
Special Errand Rule
- an injury sustained by an employee outside the company premises is compensable if his being out is
covered by an office order or a locator slip or a pass for official business.
While Living, Boarding, or Lodging on Premises of Employer, or at Working Place
- it may be stated, as a general rule, that an injury to an employee living, boarding, or lodging on the
employer’s premises, or at the place where the work is being done, pursuant to an express or implied
requirement of the contract of hiring, if reasonably attributable or incidental to the nature of the
employment, or to the conditions under which he lives in the performance of his duties, is to be regarded
as having arisen out of and in the course of such employment
- Exception: where such residence on the employer’s premises is merely permissive and not required or
where the injury results from a risk or danger which is not reasonably incidental to the employment.
While Traveling
- as to the compensability of injuries to employee, this depends on the performance of duties which
necessitates their travelling from place to place away from the premises of the employer, sustained while
so traveling, deemed as arising out of and in the course of the employment.
Factors to be considered: whether the injury results from a risk
- Which is inherent in the nature of the employment, or
- Which is reasonably incidental thereto or
- To which the employee I specially exposed and
- Upon whether the employee, at the time of the occurrence of the accident, was engaged in the exercise
of some functions or duties reasonably necessary or incidental to the performance of the contract of
employment or
- If not actively engaged, whether he was at a place where he was authorized or required by such
contract to be.
- It has been said that an employee who is away from home on a business trip for his employer is in most
circumstances under continuous worker’s compensation coverage from the time he leaves until he returns
home, although there are exceptions to this rule.
Where Employee Uses Own Vehicle Which He Also Uses in Performance of Duties
- In some cases in which it appeared that an employee was using his own vehicle at the time he was injured
in an accident while going to or from work, and the he used such vehicle in the performance of his duties
to his employer, it was held that his injuries arose out of and in the course of the employment. This results
has been reached where the employee was injured in a train streetcar accident
Effect of Deviation from Route, Schedule or Mode of Travel
- Deviation by a travelling employee from his usually prescribed route, schedule or mode of travel
constitutes such a departure from the scope or course of his employment.
Dual Purpose Doctrine
- Also known as “Mining of Purposes of Employer and Employee” considers as compensable an injury that
an employee sustains while on a trip undertaken from the benefit of the employer even if in the course
thereof, the employee pursues also a personal purpose.
- This doctrine of American origin, has been adopted by the ECC in its Resolution No. 99-08-0469 dated
August 31, 1999. This means that the doctrine may be applied in the adjudication of employees’
compensation claims.
- The application, however, is subject to the following guidelines:
1. A contingency or injury an employee suffers during a trip that serves both business and
personal purposes is deemed within the course of employment, that is, if the trip
involves the performance of a service for the employer, which would have caused the
trip to be done by someone else, even if such trip had not coincided with a personal
purpose.
This guideline applies to out-of-town trips, trips to, and from work, and to
miscellaneous errands motivated to an extent by an intention of the employee to
transact official business during such trips.
2. When an employee’s trip tends to serve both business and personal purposes, it is
considered a personal trip, if the employee would have made such a trip, in spite of
the failure or absence of the business or official purposes, and if the employee would
not have made the trip because of the failure of the private purpose thereof, and the
non-fulfillment of the business purpose.
Employer- Sponsored Activities
-in determining whether an injury suffered by an employee in the course of recreation is compensable, the test is
whether the recreation was for the employee’s exclusive benefit, or whether the employer had some interest in
the activity. Where an employee is injured while at recreation during a temporary cessation of work, he injury is
compensable as arising out of and in the course of employment where the recreation indulged in was fostered
and encouraged by the employer to the end of efficiency of their service.
Recreational activities fall under the so-called “special engagement rule” which is one of the exceptions to the
“direct premises rule”. This exception covers field trips, intramurals, outings, and picnics when initiated or
sanctioned by the employer. Accidents befalling employees on those occasions are compensable.
Acts of God or Force Majuere
The generally accepted doctrine is that the employer is not responsible for accidents arising from force majeure
or an act of God, as it is usually called, when the employee has not been exposed to a greater danger than
usual.
Exception: the so called positional and local risks doctrine where, if an employee, by reason of his duties, is
exposed to a special or peculiar danger from the elements, that is, one greater than to which other persons in the
community are exposed, and an unexpected injury is sustained by reason of the elements, the injury constitutes
an accident arising out and in the course of the employment within the meaning of the workmen’s compensation
acts.
Stated otherwise, when one in the course of his employment is reasonably required to be at a particular place at
a particular time and there meets an accident, although one which any other person then and there present
would have met irrespective of his employment, that accident is one arising out of the employment of the person
so injured.
Assault
- An assault, although resulting from a deliberate act of the slayer, is considered an accident within the
meaning of the WCA (Workmen’s Compensation Act) since the word accident is intended to indicate that
the act causing the injury shall be causal or unforeseen, an act for which the injured party is not legally
responsible.
- Jurisprudence is to the effect that injuries sustained by an employee while in the course of his
employment, as the result of an assault upon his person by another employee, or by a third person, no
question of the injured employee’s own culpability being involved, is compensable where, from the
evidence presented a rational mind is able to trace the injury to a cause set in motion by the nature of
the employment, or some condition, obligation or incident therein, and not by some other agency.
- While some earlier cases seem to indicate that the causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not
common to the neighborhood for the injuries to arise out of and in the course of the employment, later
cases have been somewhat more liberal, saying that, to be compensable, injuries do not have to arise
from something peculiar to the employment. Where the duties of an employee entail his presence (at a
place and a time) the claim for an injury there occurring is not to be barred because it results from a risk
common to all others… unless it is also common to the general public without regard to such conditions,
and independently of place, employment or pursuit.
The majority decision ruled the death compensable. The bases:
A. Once it is proved that the employee died in the course of the employment, the legal presumption under
the former compensation law, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, is that the claim
comes within the provisions of the compensation law (Sec. 13) in other words, that the incident arose out
of the workman’s employment.
B. Doubts as to the rights to compensation are resolved in favor of the employee and his dependents
C. The commissioner’s declaration on the work connection might be binding on the Court
D. There are employments, which increase the risk of assault on the person of the employee and it is that
sense that an injury or harm sustained by the assaulted worker arises out of the employment, because the
increased risk to assault supplies the link or connection between the injury and the employment.
Increased Risk Jobs
Among those jobs are:
A. Jobs having to do with keeping the peace of guarding property
B. Jobs having to do with keeping or carrying of money which subject the employee to the risk of assault
because of the increased temptation to robbery
C. Jobs which expose the employee to direct contact with lawless and irresponsible members of the
community, like that of a bartender and
D. Work as bus driver, taxi driver, or street car conductor
Sickness, defined: Occupational or Compensable Disease
- Article 167(1) of the Labor Code defines compensable sickness as any illness definitely accepted as an
occupational disease listed by the Commission, or any illness caused by employment subject to proof by
the employee that the risk of contracting the same is increased by working conditions. For this purpose,
the Commission is empowered to determine and approve occupational diseases and work-related
illnesses that may be considered compensable based on peculiar hazards of employment
- Section 1(b) Rule III of the Amended Rules on WEC further amplifies sickness, thus: For the sickness and the
resulting disability or death to be compensable, the sickness must be the result of an occupational disease
listed under Annex A of these Rules with the conditions set therein satisfied; otherwise proof must be
shown that the risk of contracting the disease is increased by the working conditions.
- If the illness are not occupational diseases, the claimant must present proof that he contracted them in the
course of his employment. He who alleges a fact has the burden of proving it and a mere allegation is
not evidence. (Galandia v ECC GR No. 70660 (1987)
- An illness is deemed compensable under the increased risk theory if it is caused or precipitated by
factors inherent in the employee’s nature of work and working conditions.
- Aggravation of pre-existing illness is not included.
- An occupational disease is one which develops as a result of hazards peculiar to certain occupations, due
to toxic substances (as in the organic solvent industry) radiation (as in television repairmen) repeated
mechanical injury, emotional strain etc
Ruling: An occupational disease is one which results from the nature of the employment, and by nature is meant
conditions to which all employees of a class are subject and which produce the disease as a natural incident of a
particular occupation, and attach to that occupation a hazard which distinguishes it from the usual run of
occupations and is in excess of the hazard attending the employment in general.
- to be occupational, the disease must be one due wholly to causes and conditions which are normal and
constantly present and characteristic of the particular occupation; that is, things which science and industry
have not yet learned to eliminate. Every worker in every planet of the same industry is alike constantly
exposed to the danger of contracting a particular occupational disease
Duties of Employer Regarding Occupational Disease
- Under Rule III Sec. 2 of the Amended ECC Rules, the employer is bound to require pre-employment
examination of all prospective employees and to provide periodic medical examination of employees
exposed to occupational diseases.
- This may be done by a company retained medical practitioner, but for the protection of the worker, must
be by a public health practitioner, as required by the Labor Code, as amended.
Evidence: Degree of Proof
- If the disease is listed in the Table of Occupational Disease embodied in Annex A of the Riles on EC, no
proof of causation is required. However, if it is not so listed, the employee, this time assisted by his
employer, is required to prove a positive proposition, that is, that the risk of contracting the disease is
increased by the working conditions. The fact that the cause of the disease was not positively identified
does not dispense with the burden of proof.
- Proof of direct causal relation is not, however, indispensably required. It is enough that the claimant
adduces proof of reasonable work connection, whereby the development of the disease was brought
about largely by the conditions present in the nature of the job. Strict rules of evidence are not
demanded. The degree of proof required is merely substantial evidence, which has been held to be such
relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as sufficient to support a conclusion.
Cancer: the Old Doctrine
- Requisite proof can be given only if the cause of the disease-cancer-can itself be known
- The necessity of proof is present only when the cause of the disease is known. If not known, there is no
duty to present proof, for the law doesn’t demand an impossibility. Thus, the requirement that the disease
was caused or aggravated by the employment or work applies only to an illness where the cause can be
determined or proved.
- Where the causes of an ailment are unknown to and/or undetermined even by medical science, the
requirement of proof of any causal link between the ailment and the working conditions should be
liberalized so that those who have less in life shall have more in law
Suicide: When Compensable
- According to American authorities, it is compensable in the following cases:
1. When it results from insanity resulting from compensable work injury or disease
2. When it occurs during a delirium resulting from compensable disease
- Self-destruction is not presumed. In cases where compensation is sought for a violent death due to
accident, our courts have refused so far to impute to the victim an intention to end his life. The laborer is
presumed to take the necessary precautions to avoid injury to himself, unless an intention is attributed to
him to end his life. That presumption is based on the instinct of self-preservation.
- Contract which are the private laws of the contracting parties should be fulfilled according to the literal
sense of their stipulation, if their terms are clear and leave no room for doubt as to the intention of the
contracting parties, for contracts are obligatory, no matter what their form may be, whenever the
essential requisites for their validity are present
Notorious negligence
- The kind or degree of negligence on the part of the employee which, by virtue of Art. 172, exempts the
State Insurance Fund from liability for injuries suffered by the former
- It is something more than simple or contributory negligence. It signifies as deliberate act of the employee
to disregard his own personal safety. Disobedience to rules and/or prohibition doesn’t in itself constitute
notorious negligence, if no intention can be attributed to the injure to end his life.
Art. 173 Extent of Liability
- Unless otherwise provided, the liability of the SIF shall be exclusive and in place of all other liabilities of
the employer to the employee, his dependents or anyone otherwise entitled to receive damages on
behalf of the employee or his dependents. The payment of compensation under this Title shall not bar
recovery of benefits as provided for in Section 699 of the Revised Administrative Code, RA 1161, as
amended, CA 186, as amended, and other laws whose benefits are administered by the System, or other
agencies of the government.
Excepting Circumstances
Intoxication- refers to a person’s condition in being under the influence of liquor or prohibited drugs to the
extent that his/her acts, words or conduct is impaired visibly, as to prevent him/her from physically and mentally
engaging in the duties of his/her employment
Notorious Negligence- is something more than mere or simple negligence but signifies a deliberate act of the
employee to disregard his own safety, or ignore established warning or precaution
Willful Intent to Injure or Kill Oneself or Another- contemplates a deliberate intent on the part of the employee
to inflict injuries on himself or another
OPTIONS AVAILABLE: BENEFITS UNDER THE COMPENSATION LAW OR UNDER THE CIVIL CODE
- Does the compensation remedy under the WCA (now under the Labor Code) for work-connected death
or injuries exclude other remedies under the Civil Code? Meaning can the injured employee or the heirs
of a deceased employee file compensation claims under the WCA (now ECC), the Civil Code, and the
Labor Code?
- Or would the Rule on Exclusivity apply, that a claim with one excludes the others?
- In Floresca v Philex 136 SCRA 141, involving a complaint for damages for the death of five miners in a
cave-in, the SC was confronted with 3 divergent opinions on the exclusivity rule.
- a. One view is that the injured employee or hi heirs, in case of death, may initiate an action to recover
damages (not compensation under the WCA) with the regular courts on the basis of negligence of the
employer pursuant to the Civil Code.
- b. Another view, enunciated in the Robles case, is that the remedy of an employee for work-connected
injury or accident is exclusive in accordance with Sec.5 of WCA
- c. Last view is that the action is selective and the employee or his heirs have a choice of availing
themselves of the benefits under the WCA or of suing in the regular courts under the Civil Code for higher
damages from the employer by reason of his negligence. But once the election has been exercised, the
employee or his heirs are no longer free to opt for the other remedy, i.e. the employee cannot pursue
both actions simultaneously.
- The majority adopted the latter view, reiterating as main authority its earlier decision in Pacana v Cebu
Autobus Company, 32 SCRA 442. It rejected the doctrine of exclusivity of the rights and remedies
granted by the WCA as laid down in the Robles case.
- If the complainant not only had adopted to recover under this Act but had also been duly paid, a sense
of fair play demands that if a person entitled to a choice of remedies made a first selection and
accepted the benefits thereof, he should no longer be allowed to exercise the second option.
- After one had staked his fortunes on a particular remedy, he is precluded from pursuing the alternate
course, at least until the prior claim is rejected by the Compensation Commission.
Recovery under the Labor Code and the Social Security Law
- Simultaneous recovery of benefits under the ECC of the Labor Code and under the SS Law is allowed.
This is the advisory opinion by the Sec. of Justice to the SSS (May 23, 1989 and Jan. 12, 1990)
explained as:
- “It is true that the SSS law is distinct and different from the Labor Code. However, the provisions of Sec.
15 of SSS law and Art. 173 of Labor Code are in pari material insofar also as both provisions barred the
simultaneous recovery of benefits under both the SSS law and the LC, until Art. 173 was amended by PD
1921 in 1984. The amendment introduced by PD 1921 to Art. 173 lifted the ban against
simultaneous recovery, and is deemed to have repealed by necessary implication the provision of
Sec. 15 of the SSS law which bars such simultaneous recovery of benefits. Since PD 1921 is the latest
expression of the legislative will, it will prevail over Sec. 15 which has become irreconcilably inconsistent
with the said amendatory law. We wish to emphasize, however, that PD 1921 took effect in 1984 and is
deemed to be prospective in operation, in the absence of an express provision giving it retroactive
effect.
Art. 174. Liability of Third Parties
- When the disability or death is caused by circumstances creating a legal liability against a third party,
the disabled employee or the dependents in case of his death shall be paid by the System under this
Title. In case benefit is paid under this Title, the system shall be subrogated to the rights of the disabled
employee or the dependents in case of his death, in accordance with the general law.
- Where the System recovers from such third party damages in excess of those paid or allowed under this
Title, such excess shall be delivered to the disabled employee or other persons entitled thereto, after
deducting the cost of proceedings and expenses of the System. (as amended by Sec. 17 PD 850)
Art. 175 Deprivation of Benefits
- Except as otherwise provided under this Title, no contract, regulation, or device whatsoever shall operate
to deprive the employee or his dependents of any part of the income benefits, and medical or related
services granted under this Title. Existing medical services being provided by the employer shall be
maintained and continued to be enjoyed by their employee.
November 11, 2018