= = DESCRIPTION Debater stood up, stands there and then sits down, Literally didn't do anything at al not even a word. Debater attempts debating, have : 4) Totally debated a wrong debate €). Presented his/her argument in a very confusing manner us across at al. f)_Has little to zero content Debater understands debating and understands what the debate is about. Performs his/her roles correctly but lacking in terms of either: €) Analysis of his/her arguments 4] Engagement with the opposing team 8) Structure of his/her presentation (ideas still managed to somewhat come across) __h)_Persuasiveness 70 four average debater. Understands debating and what the debate is about. Performs everything well [anoiysis, engaging with opposing team, structure and persuasiveness) but lack depth to.consider him as above average debater 71-75 | Your above average debater Understands debating and what the slebate 1s about very well. Should be able to 2), Presents his/her argument in a well crafted structare f} Has arguments with deep analysis. Covers most of the things that needed to be explained to make the argument easily understandable and highly persuasive. 8) Actively engaging the opposing; team’s argument and able to compare with his/her own case | __h) Good usage of debating strategies Your great debater Has all the qualities for the above average debater with the addition of being very articulate and stylistic. Your 75 ~ 78 debaters should also he extremely persuasive throughout his/her speech ‘The analysis forall of the arguments should be extremely well crafted and well presented, It should be free from petty loopholes and every everage reasonable | person should be able to understand all the concepts presented even without prior knowledge on the subject matter. Definitely going to the Grand Finals SCORE MARGINS [Very close debate. You had a horrible time deciding who should win the debate and had to really refer to your notes in order to decide the winner. [Very clear debate. You didn't really suffer in making this decision. Tels lear that the wigning team should be given the win. Sil, the opposing team de herr best to win ‘the round. Ultimate trashing. itis basically like debating against a wall The other team didn't do | anvehi however has the debate totally wrong, He/she might iI no ideas come 65-69 NEW DATO’ WiRA ads FORM