2/9/2019 Reformed Apologetics Ministries: Revisiting the Age of Aisha Pt.

3
http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html Go MAR APR MAY 👤 ⍰❎
9 captures 23 f 🐦
31 Aug 2016 - 25 May 2018 2016 2018 2019 ▾ About this capture

ABOUT Wednesday, August 17, 2016

My name is Keith Thompson. I Revisiting the Age of Aisha Pt. 3

am a Christian apologist and
documentary film maker. I
write for www.Answering-
Islam.org and am the owner of By Sam Shamoun
Reformed Apologetics
Ministries. I can be reached at
We continue from where we previously left off.
keithtruth2010@hotmail.com

Home Page
A Role Model for All Times

My DOCUMENTARY FILMS
Even though Brown appeals to cultural norms to justify Muhammad’s marriage to a premature minor, he
- Black Hebrew Israelites forgets to mention that fact that his prophet is supposed to be a role model for all peoples at all times.
Debunked Therefore, why would Muhammad not only condone, but actually engage, in such a cultural practice seeing that
- Darwinism's Downfall he is supposed to be a mercy for mankind?
- Sword and the Crescent
- Atheists Don't Exist
And We have sent you (O Muhammad) not but as a mercy for the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that
- Purgatory Debunked
- Reformed Answers on the
exists). S. 21:107 Hilali-Khan
Roman Corruption of
Christianity Therefore, wouldn’t it have been more merciful for Brown’s moral and spiritual example to have abolished this
- Word of Faith Teachers: practice of marrying and having sex with emotionally and physically immature females? Why then enshrine
Origins & Errors of Their and engage in such a vile practice that leaves girls traumatized sexually, emotionally and physiologically?
Teaching
- Joel Osteen: Origins and Abolishing A Loving and Compassionate Institution
Errors of his Teaching
- Historical Case for Paul's
After all, didn’t Muhammad abolish adoption, which benefits both orphans and couples who cannot have
Apostleship: Critique of
children of their own?
Muslim Arguments

Why then abolish such a humane practice, which brings great emotional healing and love to so many human
lives, while sanctioning the sexual abuse of minors?
VIDEO TEACHINGS

- An Historical Case for
Christ's Resurrection
- Adolf Hitler was not a
Christian
- Refuting the Lie John Invented
Sayings of Jesus
- Shabir Ally & Raymond
Brown’s Redaction Criticism of
John
- Answering Muslims: Is Jesus
a Son Among Tons?
- Refuting Bart Ehrman’s
“Passion Contradictions”
Muslims Parrot
- How Salvation Works: Plain
and Simple
- Catholic Idol Worshiper's Big
Justification Lie
- Jesus Sent for Jews Only?:
Answering Muslims
- Old Testament Genocide?:
Answering "Atheists"
- The Bible and Slavery:
Answering "Atheists"
- Absurdities of Youtube Atheist
"CultofDusty"
This becomes all the more troubling when we read the reason the Islamic sources give for Brown’s prophet
getting rid of adoption. According to Muslim tradition, Q. 33:4-5 and 40 were “revealed” in response to the
unbelievers mocking Muhammad for taking his adopted son’s wife in marriage:
“… This verse was revealed about Zayd ibn Harithah. He was a slave of the Messenger of Allah
but he freed him and adopted him before he was sent as a Prophet. When the Prophet married
Zaynab bint Jahsh, who was the divorcee of Zayd ibn Harithah, the Jews and hypocrites said:
‘Muhammad has married the wife of his son while forbidding people from doing the same!’
And so Allah, exalted is He, revealed this verse. Sa'id ibn Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Nu'aym al-
Ishkabi informed us> al-Hasan ibn Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn 'Ali ibn Makhlid> Muhammad ibn
Ishaq al-Thaqafi> Qutaybah ibn Sa'id> Ya'qub ibn 'Abd al-Rahman> Musa ibn 'Uqbah> Salim>
'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar who used to say: ‘We did not use to call Zayd ibn Harithah with any other
name except Zayd ibn Muhammad until the Qur'an revealed (Proclaim their real parentage.
That will be more equitable in the sight of Allah) [33:5]’. This was narrated by Bukhari> Mu'alla
ibn Asad> 'Abd al-'Aziz ibn al-Mukhtar> Musa ibn 'Uqbah. ('Alī ibn Ahmad al-Wahidi, Asbab al-
Nuzul; bold and underline emphasis ours)
“Muhammad is not the father of any man among you: he is not Zayd’s biological father and so it
is not unlawful for him to marry his [former] wife Zaynab [after him]…” (Tafsir al-Jalalayn;
bold and underline emphasis ours)
What this means is that Muhammad only abolished adoption in order to save face since he was bothered by
the accusation leveled against him that he had pretty much stolen his very own son’s wife, a practice which
God’s Word condemns as sexual immorality:

https://web.archive.org/web/20180423132711/http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html 1/5
2/9/2019
- Absurdities of Youtube Atheist
http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html
9 captures
“Thunderf00t”
- Absurdities of Youtube Atheist
31 Aug 2016 - 25 May 2018
"AronRa"
- 20 Reasons to Never Join
Islam
- The Bible Teaches Original
Sin
- Whalid Shoebat’s Son’s
“Christian Militancy” Teaching
Refuted
- Proof Virgin Mary is not the
Ark of the Covenant
-Brief Explanation of Calvinism
- Jeffrey Daugherty's "Apostle
Paul Antichrist" Theory
Debunked
- Refutation of Heretic Jesse
Morrell's Documentary
"Beyond Augustine" part 1, 2
- Myth of Imputed
Righteousness of Christ?
Answering Heretic Jesse
Morrell
- A Biblical Case for
Determinism: God's
sovereignty over all (Chris
Gautreau)
- Defending Reformed View of
John 6 - Refuting Heretic
Kerrigan Skelly
- Was Judas Once a Saved True
Believer? - Refuting Heretic
Kerrigan Skelly
- Theory on the Origins of
Papal Infallibility
-Answers to Theological
Questions Posed by YouTube
Subscribers - part 1, 2, 3
DEBATES & DISCUSSIONS
- Is Muhammad Predicted in
the Bible? (Keith Thompson vs.
Inamullah Mumtaz)
- Is Papal Primacy Primitive?
(Keith Thompson vs. Catholic
Minister)
- Is the Roman Catholic Papacy
Biblical and Historical? (Keith
Thompson vs. Roman Catholic)
- Papal Primacy and Canon
Debate (Keith Thompson vs.
Catholic)
- Catholic Apologist Admits he
can't Historically Prove Peter
was First Roman Bishop &
More (Keith Thompson vs.
Fidei Defensor SPQR)
- Is Justification by Faith
Alone? (Keith Thompson vs.
Catholic Peter Dimond)
- Is Paul a True Apostle? (Keith
Thompson vs. Muslim Nadir
Ahmed)
- Does the Immaculate
Conception Contradict
Scripture and History? (Keith
Thompson vs. Richard a Roman
Catholic)
-Infant Baptism Debate: Chris
Gautreau vs. Zachary Kueker
(written debate)
- Is God Sovereign Over All?
(Chris Gautreau vs.
FaithandPractice)
- Is Christianity a Religion of
Peace? (Keith Thompson vs.
Muslim Sami Zaatari)
- Discussion with two Catholics
on Interpreting Scripture
- Is Free Will Biblical? (Keith
https://web.archive.org/web/20180423132711/http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html
Reformed Apologetics Ministries: Revisiting the Age of Aisha Pt. 3
Go MAR APR MAY 👤 ⍰❎
23wife; you shall not f 🐦
“You shall not uncover the nakedness of your daughter-in-law: she is your son’s
uncover her nakedness.” Leviticus 18:15 2016 2018 2019 ▾ About this capture
“If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall be put to death; they have committed
perversion, their blood is upon them.” Leviticus 20:12
To make matters worse, both the Quran and traditions indicate that Muhammad had already started lusting
after his daughter-in-law while she was still married to his son, and that it was Allah who had decreed this
to happen for the express purpose of showing men that they could also marry the divorcees of their adopted
sons if they so desired:
And (remember) when you said to him (Zaid bin Harithah the freedslave of the Prophet) on whom
Allah has bestowed Grace (by guiding him to Islam) and you (O Muhammad too) have done favour
(by manumitting him) "Keep your wife to yourself, and fear Allah." But you did hide in yourself
(i.e. what Allah has already made known to you that He will give her to you in marriage) that
which Allah will make manifest, you did fear the people (i.e., Muhammad married the divorced
wife of his manumitted slave) whereas Allah had a better right that you should fear Him. So when
Zaid had accomplished his desire from her (i.e. divorced her), We gave her to you in marriage, so
that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the believers in respect of (the marriage of) the wives
of their adopted sons when the latter have no desire to keep them (i.e. they have divorced them).
And Allah's Command must be fulfilled. S. 33:37 Hilali-Khan
However, this raises another major problem. How could Muhammad’s marriage to his daughter-in-law be
an example for others when Allah decided to abolish the practice of adoption shortly afterwards? Isn’t this
proof that Muhammad was simply looking for a pretext to justify lusting after his daughter-in-law?
No matter how Muslim apologists try to spin this, the fact remains that both Muhammad and his deity
stand condemned by the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ:
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone
who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart… It was also
said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that
anyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, causes her to commit adultery;
and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” Matthew 5:27-28, 31-32
According to Christ, Muhammad was an adulterer who caused his son’s divorced wife to commit adultery
with him. This means that Allah is in the business of turning people into sexual deviants and adulterers, a
fact which Muhammad candidly admitted:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
I did not see anything so resembling minor sins as what Abu Huraira said from the Prophet, who
said, “Allah has written for the son of Adam his INEVITABLE share of adultery whether he is
aware of it or not: The adultery of the eye is the looking (at something which is sinful to look at),
and the adultery of the tongue is to utter (what it is unlawful to utter), and the innerself wishes and
longs for (adultery) and the private parts turn that into reality or refrain from submitting to the
temptation.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 77, Number 609)
Verily Allah has fixed the very portion of adultery which a man will indulge in, and which he
OF NECESSITY MUST COMMIT (or there would be no escape from it). (Sahih Muslim, Book
033, Number 6421)
With this in mind, what kind of god would force people, specifically his own messenger, to commit
adultery? And what kind of deity would abolish a loving, compassionate institution such as adoption in
order to spare his prophet from enduring further humiliation from the people who rightfully complained
and condemned him for taking his adopted son’s former spouse in marriage?
What all of this shows is that, far from being a mercy to mankind, Muhammad brought untold misery, pain
and suffering to countless numbers of lives especially to young girls, as well as to orphans and barren
couples who will never experience the joy of having a family to belong to, no thanks to Allah and his
messenger!
In light of the foregoing, we need to ask Dr. Brown whether he really is ok with his prophet doing away
with adoption, which benefits millions of people by placing orphaned children into the arms of loving
families, especially couples who can’t have children of their own, while sanctioning the inhumane practice
of grown men marrying and having sex with prepubescent minors.
Marrying Minors – A Cultural Practice?
Besides, not all Muslims agree that it was culturally acceptable for grown men to marry and/or have sex
with physically and psychologically premature minors. Moiz Amjad of Understanding Islam says:
In my opinion, neither was it an Arab tradition to give away girls in marriage at an age as young as
nine or ten years, nor did the Prophet marry Ayesha at such a young age. The people of Arabia did
2/5
2/9/2019
Thompson vs. Charismatic
http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html because it never happened in the manner
9 captures
Arminian)
- Is Original Sin Biblical?
31 Aug 2016 - 25 May 2018
(Keith Thompson vs. Two
Pelagians)
- Does the New Testament
Teach the Deity of Jesus?
(Keith Thompson vs. Yuratchka
the Arian)
- Does Scripture Teach
Predestination? (Keith
Thompson vs. Arminian - very
short)
ARTICLES
Islam
- A Definitive Look at the
James White Yasir Qadhi
Controversy
- The Reliability of the Gospel
of John
- Comprehensive Case Jesus
Died by Crucifixion
- Are the Gospels too late and
Unreliable?
- Original Sources the Koran
Stole its Stories from
- The Corruption of the Koran:
Evidence and New Research
- Muhammad Taught and
Practiced Offensive Jihad
- Are Muhammad and Islam
Predicted in the Bible?
- Errors in the Koran and
Ahadith
- Evidence Muhammad was
Demon Possessed
- Jesus as God Before Paul
- Some Absurd and Silly
Teachings of Muhammad
- Refuting Bart Ehrman’s
“Passion Contradictions”
Muslims Parrot
- Jesus Sent for Jews Only?:
Answering Muslims
- 20 Reasons to Never Join
Islam
- Is Christianity a Religion of
Peace?
- Who Wrote the Gospels?
Internal and External
Arguments for Traditional
Authorship
- Answering Sami Zaatari on
the Pharisaic Accusation that
Christ Claimed Deity
- A Case for the Deity of Christ
in Light of Muslim Objections
- The Historical Case for Paul's
Apostleship: And a Critique of
Muslim Arguments
- Muhammad's Condition in
Light of the Biblical
Description of Demonic
Possession
- Christ’s Deity in Light of not
Knowing the Day & Hour of
His Return
- Daniel 7:13-14 and Christ’s
Deity: Answering Ibn Anwar’s
Eisegesis
- The Historicity of the
Appearance to the 500 in 1
Corinthians 15:6
- Muslim Misuse of Hebrews
5:7: Does This Verse Teach
Jesus Never Died?
- Ibn Anwar’s False Charge of
Anachronistic Error: An
Exegetical Examination of
https://web.archive.org/web/20180423132711/http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html
Reformed Apologetics Ministries: Revisiting the Age of Aisha Pt. 3
not object to this marriage,
it hasAPR
Go MAR beenMAY
narrated. 👤 ⍰❎
23 ours)
(What was Ayesha's Age at the Time of Her Marriage to the Prophet?; bold emphasis f 🐦
2016 2018 2019 ▾ About this capture
The following Muslim agrees with Amjad over against Brown:
A Christian friend asked me once, "Will you marry your seven year old daughter to a fifty year old
man?" I kept my silence. He continued, "If you would not, how can you approve the marriage of an
innocent seven year old, Ayesha, with your Prophet?" I told him, "I don’t have an answer to your
question at this time." My friend smiled and left me with a thorn in the heart of my faith. Most
Muslims answer that such marriages were accepted in those days. Otherwise, people would have
objected to Prophet’s marriage with Ayesha.
However, such an explanation would be gullible only for those who are naive enough to
believe it. But unfortunately, I was not satisfied with the answer.
The Prophet was an exemplary man. All his actions were most virtuous so that we, Muslims, can
emulate them. However, most people in our Islamic Center of Toledo, including me, would not
think of betrothing our seven years daughter to a fifty-two year-old man. If a parent agrees to
such a wedding, most people, if not all, would look down upon the father and the old husband.
In 1923, registrars of marriage in Egypt were instructed not to register and issue official certificates
of marriage for brides less than sixteen and grooms less than eighteen years of age. Eight years
later, the Law of the Organization and Procedure of Sheriah courts of 1931 consolidated the above
provision by not hearing the marriage disputes involving brides less than sixteen and grooms less
than eighteen years old. (Women in Muslim Family Law, John Esposito, 1982). It shows that even
in the Muslim majority country of Egypt the child marriages are unacceptable.
So, I believed, without solid evidence other than my reverence to my Prophet, that the stories of the
marriage of seven-year-old Ayesha to 50-year-old Prophet are only myths. However, my long
pursuit in search of the truth on this matter proved my intuition correct. My Prophet was a
gentleman. And he did not marry an innocent seven or nine year old girl. The age of Ayesha has
been erroneously reported in the hadith literature. Furthermore, I think that the narratives reporting
this event are highly unreliable. Some of the hadith (traditions of the Prophet) regarding Ayesha’s
age at the time of her wedding with prophet are problematic. I present the following evidences
against the acceptance of the fictitious story by Hisham ibn ‘Urwah and to clear the name of my
Prophet as an irresponsible old man preying on an innocent little girl. (T.O. Shanavas, Was
Ayesha A Six-Year-Old Bride? The Ancient Myth Exposed; bold emphasis ours)
It is rather intriguing that those who reject the claims of the hadith that Muhammad married Aisha at nine
have no problem admitting that such marriages with premature girls were not the norm or morally
acceptable. On the other hand, those who accept these narrations as genuine are forced to argue that these
marriages were normal during that time and therefore morally unobjectionable, in order to justify what
Muhammad did!
Unfortunately for Amjad and Shanavas, Muhamamd’s marriage to a 9-year-old minor is one of the best-attested
“facts” in their prophet’s life since it is found in their earliest and most “reliable” sources. Therefore, these men
have no choice but to accept that according to their very own apologetic, Muhammad did something that was
deemed to be inappropriate behavior for a grown man to engage even by the cultural standards of that day.
Here are a few articles that provide a rigorous and thorough refutation of all the arguments set forth by Amjad,
Shanavas and others like them who seek to undermine the veracity of the Islamic reports, which attest to the
fact of Aisha being a young 9-year-old girl when Muhammad slept with her:
‘Ā’isha’sAge at the Time of Her Marriage
More on ‘Ā’isha’s Age at the Time of Her Marriage
The Age of Aishah’s Marriage Between Historians and Hadith Scholars
Age of the Mother of the Believers ‘Aa’ishah when the Prophet married her
Refutation of the lie that the Prophet married ‘Aa’ishah when she was 18 years old
And Muslims still want to call this man a mercy for humanity?
Moreover, the Quran condemned anyone who would even think of marrying Muhammad’s women after his
death:
“… And it is not (right) for you that you should annoy Allah's Messenger, nor that you should ever
marry his wives after him (his death). Verily! With Allah that shall be an enormity.” S. 33:53 Hilali-
Khan
This means that all of Muhammad’s wives were forced to become widows for the rest of their lives, especially
Aisha who was widowed at the young age of 18. Thus, Aisha was robbed of the joy of having children or
3/5
2/9/2019 Reformed Apologetics Ministries: Revisiting the Age of Aisha Pt. 3
Mark 2:26 having a husband to love and
http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html care for her all the days that she lived. Where, then,
Go isMAR APR MAY
the mercy in all this? 👤 ⍰❎
9 captures
- Ibn Anwar’s False Charge of 23 f 🐦
Anachronistic Error: An
31 Aug 2016 - 25 May 2018 Now does Brown truly want us to think that Muhammad’s marriages were a display of his
2016 great
2018 mercy and
2019 ▾ About this capture
Exegetical Examination of
compassion when wives such as Aisha ended up becoming widowed in their late teens or, in some cases, early
Mark 2:26, Part 2
twenties, and who were then forced to remain unmarried for so many years afterwards? Is this what Brown
- Jesus as Divine Judge: A
Response to the Muhammedan really believes in his heart? We truly hope not and pray that, by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, this learned
Site “Do Not Say Trinity” professor will come to see all of this for what it actually is.
- Bart Ehrman: A Hero For
Islam? Brown’s problems are still not over as we are about to see in the fourth part of our discussion.
- Is Asking “Where did Jesus
say, ‘I am God’” a Good
Posted by Keith Thompson at 3:35 PM
Argument?
- Revisiting “Where Did Jesus
Say ‘I am God’" A Response to
2 comments:
the Muhammedan Site “Do Not
Say Trinity"
- Contra Paul Williams on the Hector Mendez June 8, 2017 at 7:32 PM
Death Penalty for Apostasy &
God bless you, my name is Hector and i have found your documentaries of great blessings, by the grace of God. I
Christianity
wanted to simply ask if you would be open to the idea of translating or putting subtitles so others form other
- Heaven vs. Jannah: Assessing
dialects may also be blessed or if you can link me to Reformed apologists that are spanish speaking? Thanks.
the Dilemma
- Does Muhammad Pass the 1 Reply
John 4 Prophethood Test?
- Historical and Biblical Basis
for the Trinity Hector Mendez June 8, 2017 at 7:34 PM
- Five Reasons Why Jesus is
God bless you, i have greatly been helped by your videos by God's grace. I was wondering if you could add
Not Merely a Prophet
spanish subtitles or spanish versions of your videos for other dialects?
- Answering “Jesus isn’t God
because God doesn’t change” Reply

Catholicism

- Absence of Papal Views

Among the Earliest Christians
- The Assumption of Mary is
Unbiblical and Ahistorical
- Justification is by Faith
Alone: Issues and Evidence
- Did Roman Catholicism Give
Protestants the Bible?
- Are Roman Catholics Saved?
- Refutation of Papal
Infallibility
- Biblical Evidence Against
Peter being Pope
- Does Matthew 16 Teach Peter
was the Pope? Newer Post Home Older Post
- Do John 21:15-17 and Luke
22:31-32 prove Peter was Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Pope?
- Biblical Evidence for Sola
Scriptura
- Refuting Rome's Biblical Case
for Extrabiblical Tradition
- The Early Church Fathers
Taught Sola Scriptura
- The Bible does not teach
Mary's Immaculate Conception
- Mary is not the Ark and
Tabernacle
- The Early Church did not
Believe Rome’s Doctrine of the
Immaculate Conception of
Mary
-Mary is not Co-redemptrix,
Mediatrix of all Graces, and
Advocate
- Some of Roman Catholicism's
worst Atrocities and
Abominations of History
- Baptismal Regeneration &
Justification are False
- Refuting the Catholic
Priesthood and Penance
- Proof the Roman Catholic
Mass is unbiblical and anti-
Christian
- Historical Examination of
Roman Catholic Eucharist
Theology
- Biblical and Historical

https://web.archive.org/web/20180423132711/http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html 4/5
2/9/2019 Reformed Apologetics Ministries: Revisiting the Age of Aisha Pt. 3
Refutation of Purgatory
http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html Go MAR APR MAY 👤 ⍰❎
9 captures
- Refutation of Inclusivism: 23 f 🐦
Non-Christians can not be
31 Aug 2016 - 25 May 2018 2016 2018 2019 ▾ About this capture
saved by works
- “Works” and “Works of the
Law” in Paul: Interacting with
Modern Catholic Reliance on
New Perspectivism
-Peter Dimond’s Not-So-
Stunning Acts 15 Video
-Peter Dimond LIED about
dikaiosune - Plus Debate
Challenge
- Responding to
catholicapologetics.info’s
“Some Tough Questions for
Protestants”
- Is The Jewish Apocrypha
Inspired Scripture? Pt. 1
- Is The Jewish Apocrypha
Inspired Scripture? Pt. 2
- Is The Jewish Apocrypha
Inspired Scripture? Pt. 3
- Appendix: Addressing Some
Arguments in Support of the
Apocrypha

Other

- Did the NT Use Eyewitness

Sources for its Information
about Jesus?
- Are Christians Under the Law
of Moses?
- Hitler's Darwinian Motive for
Mass Murder
- An Historical Case for
Christ's Resurrection
- The Bible and Slavery:
Answering “Atheists”
- Failure of False Religions to
Account for Human Experience
-Youtube Pelagian Sinless
Perfection Cult Redefines Sin
-Whalid Shoebat’s Son’s
“Christian Militancy” Teaching
Refuted
- The Bible Teaches Original
Sin
- Jeffrey Daugherty’s “Apostle
Paul Antichrist” Theory
Debunked
- Jesus' Imputed Righteousness:
An Exegetical Case
- Refutation of Jesse Morrell’s
Documentary “Beyond
Augustine”
- Refutation of Jesse Morrell's
Documentary "Beyond
Augustine" Part 2

Click here for Sam

Shamoun's Essays

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180423132711/http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2016/08/revisiting-age-of-aisha-pt-3.html 5/5