Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Coordinated
Coordinated
by Robby
Holt
Rob Holt
David Nordin
S I T K A E X PLO R AT I O N
Introduction ⎛ f ⎞
γ
1 ⎛ 1 ⎞
V ( f ) = V0 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ; γ = tan −1 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
(1)
f
⎝ 0 ⎠ π ⎝ Q ⎠
Well to seismic ties are fundamental in seismic interpretation as it
provides the link between subsurface properties measured directly where V(f) is the velocity corresponding to frequency f, V0 is the
at a wellbore and the remotely sensed data obtained through seismic reference velocity corresponding to reference frequency f0 and Q
sounding. Well logs measured in depth and seismic data measured is the quality factor. Equation 1 suggests that a finite Q will result in
in time require a time-depth relationship to facilitate the conver- different frequencies travelling at different velocities. Therefore, with
sion between the two different measurement domains. This could be the assumption that we have a constant Q earth, the velocities corre-
achieved through a checkshot obtained by vertical seismic profiling sponding to the logging frequencies and seismic frequencies are
(VSP) or the integration of the slowness function obtained by acoustic different and are related through equation 1.
logging, where differences between the two methods were discussed
by Gretener (1961). As checkshots from a VSP are not always avail- Furthermore, Liner (2014) argues that Backus averaging (1962) can be
able, a time-depth relationship is typically computed using the sonic used to determine the associated dispersion. Because the seismic
measurements obtained through well logging. frequencies are much lower than logging frequencies, the rapidly
⎛ π log[V V0 ] ⎞ Figure 1 shows the well to seismic tie using a time-depth relationship computed by integrating
Q = cot⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
(2)
⎝ log[V V0 ] + log[λ0 λ ] ⎠ the well log slowness. The panels from left to right show the acoustic impedance log, seismic
section with synthetic insert and the wavelet with its corresponding spectral representations.
where λ is the logging depth interval and λ 0 The coal zones begin just after 1.9 s and are identified by the low acoustic impedance intervals.
is the Backus averaging length. V and V0 then Note the poor tie in the vicinity of the coals where we have a correlation coefficient of 0.59 in
represent the velocity as measured by well the time window 1.7 s to 2.1 s. The synthetic seismogram would require a large stretch around
logging and the Backus averaged well log, the coals to visually correct for the traveltime differences.
respectively. In equation 2, the wavelength is
used instead of frequency, following Liner’s
argument that the wavelength is the more
natural domain of Backus averaging. Equation
2 yields a Q function that describes the local
attenuation behavior. A key consequence
of Liner’s results is that in addition to the
more familiar positive Q, where high frequen-
cies travel faster than low frequencies, local
negative Q is also possible, which implies
that high frequencies travel slower than low
frequencies. In the context of traveltime
differences between logging and seismic
frequencies, this implies that zones of positive
Q require stretching and zones of negative Q
require squeezing of the well logs.
Continued on Page 56
Figure 2. Left: Original logging velocities (blue) and Backus averaged velocities
(red). Right: Local attenuation function, 1/Q.
Figure 3. Well to seismic tie using a time-depth relationship computed by integrating the Backus averaged slowness. From left to right: Acoustic impedance log,
pseudo-checkshot stretch factor, well log velocity and pseudo-checkshot corrected velocity, seismic section with synthetic insert and the wavelet with its corresponding
spectral representations. Note the improved tie relative to Figure 1 around the coals identified by the low acoustic impedance intervals beginning at approximately 1.9 s.
Acknowledgements
We thank Sitka Exploration and Qeye Labs for supporting this work and David
WesternGeco for permission to show the data. Andrew Graham, Greg Cameron
and Marcello Orizzonte are acknowledged for helpful discussions. Nordin
•• started his geophysical career at Amoco in 1985
and moved to Crestar when it was spun off in
References 1991. After 6 years as an interpreter at Crestar,
Backus, G., 1962, Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering: Journal of
Geophysical Research, 67, no. 11, 4427-4440.
he joined the management group, where he
Coulombe, C. A., and Bird, D. N., 1996, Transmission filtering by high-amplitude reflection
stayed until Crestar was bought by Gulf in the
coefficients: Theory, practice, and processing considerations: The Leading Edge, 15, no. 9, 1037-1042. fall of 2000. Through an interesting and involved
Gretener, P. E. F., 1961, An analysis of the observed time discrepancies between continuous and process, he decided to step sideways and start
conventional well velocity surveys: Geophysics, 26, no. 1, 1-11.
a search business where he spent 5 years in
Kjartansson, E., 1979, Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation: Journal of Geophysical
Research: Solid Earth, 84, no. B9, 4737-4748. “working bliss”, spending his days building
Liner, C. L., 2014, Long-wave elastic attenuation produced by horizontal layering: The Leading relationships with employers and candidates
Edge, 33, no. 6, 634-638.
throughout the oil and gas business.