0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
14 visualizzazioni3 pagine
The document outlines the key classes of corporations under Philippine corporate law, including stock corporations, non-stock corporations, close corporations, and special corporations. It also discusses the process of incorporating, including promotion, the articles of incorporation, requirements regarding corporate name and citizenship, and different types of corporations such as de jure, de facto, and by estoppel. Case law is referenced throughout to provide examples related to each topic.
The document outlines the key classes of corporations under Philippine corporate law, including stock corporations, non-stock corporations, close corporations, and special corporations. It also discusses the process of incorporating, including promotion, the articles of incorporation, requirements regarding corporate name and citizenship, and different types of corporations such as de jure, de facto, and by estoppel. Case law is referenced throughout to provide examples related to each topic.
The document outlines the key classes of corporations under Philippine corporate law, including stock corporations, non-stock corporations, close corporations, and special corporations. It also discusses the process of incorporating, including promotion, the articles of incorporation, requirements regarding corporate name and citizenship, and different types of corporations such as de jure, de facto, and by estoppel. Case law is referenced throughout to provide examples related to each topic.
1. Sec. 3, 87, 88 --- stock and non-stock corporation
Valley Golf Club v. Vda. De Caram 585 SCRA 218 (2009) Coll. of Int. Rev. v. Club Filipino 5 SCRA 321 (1962)
2. Other classes of corporations under the Corporation Code:
Close corporation – Sec. 96
Special corporations – Educational, religious (Title XIII) Foreign corporations --- Sec. 123
Others: subsidiary (wholly-owned v. majority owned), affiliate,
parent/holding company, joint venture corporation, open vs. close, lay vs. religious, eleemosynary vs. civil corp., etc.
GOVERNED primarily by specific titles, then suppletorily by the
other applicable provisions of the Corp. Code
VI. CREATION OF CORPORATION
A. Promotion (relate to Sec. 3.10. of Securities Regulation Code)
McArthur v. Times Printing Co. 31 Am. St. Rep. 653
Cagayan Fishing v. Sandiko 65 Phil 223 (1937) Caram v. CA June 30, 1987
B. Incorporation
1) Steps in incorporation
2) Sections 5, 10 –19, 88, 96, 97
3) Articles of Incorporation– a) Sec. 14, 15 b) Amendment of A/I – Sec. 16, Relate to: Sec. 36.4 – power to amend Sec. 6 – voting rights of non-voting shares Sec. 81[1]--- appraisal right Secs. 37, 38, 103 – re written assent
c) Binding effect of amendment
Phil. Trust Co. v. Rivera 44 Phil. 469 (1923)
Marcus v. RH Macy 74 N.E. 2d 228 (1947) Iglesia Evangelica v. Bishop Lazaro (G.R. 184088, July 6, 2010) (see dissent of J. Carpio)
4) Name of corporation – (SEC Memo Circ. 14, Series of 2000)
Republic Planters Bank v. CA GR 93073 (Dec. 21,1992)
Armco Steel Corp. v. SEC (L-54580; Dec. 29, 1987) P.C. Javier & Sons, Inc. v. CA June 29, 2005 Industrial Refractories Corp. v. CA Oct. 3, 2002 Ang Kaanib sa Iglesia ng Dios kay Kristo Hesus v. Iglesia ng Dios kay Cristo Jesus Dec. 12, 2001 GSIS Family Bank v. BPI Family Bank Sept. 23, 2015
5) Residence of corporation - Young Auto Supply Co. v. CA (1993) 223 SCRA 670
6) Citizenship requirements --- Sec. 140
--- pertinent provisions of the 1987 Constitution
--- meaning of CAPITAL under Sec. 11, Art. 12 of the Constitution
Gamboa v. Teves, et al June 28, 2011 and Oct. 9, 2012 SEC Memo Circ. No. 8, s2013 (Guidelines in Fil-Foreign ownership) Roy v. Herbosa Nov. 22, 2016 and April 18, 2017
-- Foreign Investments Act (FIA) of 1991, as amended
--- other laws imposing maximum foreign equity --- “Philippine national” under the FIA --- Phil. corporation under the Corp. Code --- Foreign corporation under the Corp. Code
--- Control Test v. Grandfather Rule
Narra Nickel Mining v. Redmont April 21, 2014 and Jan. 28, 2015 (see dissent of J. Leonen)
--- Nationality of corporation sole
Roman Catholic Apostolic Admin. of Davao (102 Phil.596)
7) De jure corporations – requisites, powers, liabilities, validity
Pioneer Insurance v. CA (GR 84157) 175 SCRA 668 (1989)
Municipality of Malabang v. Benito (1969) 27 SCRA 533 Hall v. Piccio (1950) 86 Phil. 603 Cagayan Fishing. v. Sandiko GR L-43350 (12/23/1937) Harill v. Davis (1909) 168 F. 187
9 ) Corporation by Estoppel – Sec. 21 (rationale, liabilities, validity)
Chiang Kai Shek School v. CA (1989) 172 SCRA 389
Lim Tong Lim v. Phil. Fishing Gear (1999) 317 SCRA 728 Int’l Express Travel v. CA (2000) 343 SCRA 674 Paz v. New Int'l Environmental Universality, Inc." (April 20, 2015)
10) Corps. that are neither de jure, de facto, nor by estoppel
C. Formal organization versus commencement of business – Sec. 19
Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study