Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A Behavioral Approach
Description:
Main Characteristics:
Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond
DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2004). Models of teaching (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Components:
* Last 3 components, all dealing with practice are known as “Shaping” in Behavioral
theory, and can be recognized as “Scaffolding” in Constructivism.
(from: Killen, Roy (2006). Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and
Practice. Cengage Learning Australia)
Effectiveness Limitations
1. Direct instruction can be used to help 1. If the teacher does not appear to be
students achieve many types of learning well prepared, knowledgeable,
outcomes Direct instruction can also be confident, enthusiastic and well
used to demonstrate skills to students organized, the students will become
bored or distracted and their learning
will be hindered. Because of teacher’s
central role in direct instruction, success
of this strategy depends heavily on what
I have referred to as the ‘image’ that the
teacher projects (Killen, 1990)
2. Direct instruction can be an efficient 2. Direct instruction relies heavily on
way to introduce students to a new area students being able to assimilate
of study by giving them a broad information through listening, observing
overview that defines key concepts and and note taking. Students who are not
shows how they are interrelated. This very good at these skills will find it
helps students to develop the foundation difficult to learn from direct instruction.
knowledge that they need for later
learning
3. Direct instruction allows you to 3. t is very difficult to cater for the
highlight important points individual differences between students’
abilities, prior knowledge, interest in the
subject, rates of learning, levels of
understanding or learning styles during
direct instruction.
4. Direct instruction can be equally 4. There is some research evidence that
effective with large and small classes and the high level of structure and teacher
with students from most cultures. control that is characteristic of direct
instruction may have negative impact on
students’ problem solving abilities,
independence and curiosity (Ross &
Kyle, 1987)
5. Direct instruction is one of the most 5. If direct instruction does not involve
effective approaches for teaching explicit some students’ participation (such as
concepts and skills to low-achieving asking and answering questions), their
students (Berliner, 1982; Ross & Kyle, interest will be lost after 10-15 minutes,
1987) and they will remember little of the
content.
6. Lectures can be a useful way to 6. If used too frequently, direct
provide information for students who instruction can lead students to believe
are poor readers or who are not very that it is the teacher’s job to tell them all
skilled at locating, organizing and they need to know.
interpreting information.
7. Generally, direct instruction allows 7. Because direct instruction involves a
you to create a non-threatening learning lot of one-way communication, they may
environment for students. Those who be limited opportunities to gain feedback
are shy, not confident or not about student understanding. The
knowledgeable are not forced to teacher may not be aware that some
participate and become embarrassed. students have developed
misconceptions.
Computers can be used to:
Mazyck, M. (2002). Integrated learning systems and students of color: Two decades
of use in K – 12 education. TechTrends, 46(2), 33-39.
Ysseldyke, J., Kosciolek, S., Spicuzza, R., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning
information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. Journal
of Educational Research, 96(3), 163-173.
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/24079115/direct-instruction-
lesson-plan-example
References:
Killen, R. (2006). Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice.
Cengage Learning Australia
Ross, D. D., and Kyle, D. W. (1987).Helping pre-service teachers learn to use teacher
effectiveness research. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (2), 40-44.
Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. (2009). Psychology Applied to Teaching. (12th
ed.). Boston Massachusetts: Houghton, Mifflin.