Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
EDUC 525
Karen Goodwin
Kristi-Mari Fedorko-Bartos
Alex Black
Graeme Black
18 The teacher acts in a manner which maintains the honour and dignity of the
profession.
19 The teacher does not engage in activities that adversely affect the quality of the
Items 18 and 19 clearly outline the standards that teachers must meet to maintain their
Code of Conduct, and thereby uphold their status as members of the teaching profession. Item
19 in particular implies that the activities in which the teacher engages in -- be it on school
premises or off; during school hours or outside of school hours -- must not adversely affect the
quality of the teaching, nor in fact the quality of the teaching environment. Researchers into
these ethical implications behind teaching, such as Buzzelli, C. & Johnston, B. (2001), have
found there to be a “general agreement” amongst scholars: “teaching itself involves moral
action. Teachers are moral agents, and education as a whole, and thus classroom interaction in
particular, is fundamentally and inevitably moral in nature” (p. 876). It is hard to argue that a
teacher would not be held to significant moral and ethical standards, as a member of a
profession with monumental influence, and thus in a position to be judged for what ‘activities’
No other professional activity outside of teaching has such extended control and
influence over minors. Therefore, parents and the community have a legitimate concern about Deleted: Therefore
the qualifications and actions of those individuals the school district places in positions of
This ‘extended control’ does not cease to exist when the school bell rings at the end of
the day. Therefore, the role of the teacher, his/her realm of influence, is on-going and cannot
be reasonably seen as solely occurring during school hours and on school premises. The
teacher is in a position and duty of care similar to a parent; both containing moral and ethical
school board to school board and can been dependent on social context. Two courts could
choice of living arrangements have been deemed immoral in the past and still today in certain
communities and with certain religious school boards. The ethical implications of off duty
behavior of teachers are subject to the social context to which they reside and work.
The teaching profession involves molding the minds of the youth and taking care of
student’s in the stead of the parents to help create responsible and moral citizens. “Many people
regard a teacher as an exemplar, whose words and actions are likely to be followed by the
students coming under his care and protection” (Fulmer, 2002). Off duty conduct which is
deemed immoral within the social context they are in, can undermine the confidence the
students, parents, and school community have in a teacher’s ability and merit to remain in the
role of an educator and shaper of young minds. As a role model, teachers have a reasonability
to conduct themselves off duty in a manner which would not be deemed as immoral as their
actions and behaviour outside of school can challenge their authority and merit inside of school.
In consideration of the ethical implications involved with teacher behaviour after schools ours
and off school premises, our opinion is that both the virtue and deontological school of ethics
Virtue Ethics
Virtue can be simply defined as having or showing high moral standards. The practice
of Virtue ethics therefore “relates to predispositions of the person’s character which have
developed over time and resulted in virtuous habits of action exemplifying a virtuous character”
(J. K. Donlevy, personal communication, October 23rd, 2018). Aristotle argued that for all the
virtues to be present, the characteristic of practical wisdom must be present. Practical wisdom is
critical in the school of thought regarding Virtue Ethics and is essentially the capacity to do the
right thing, at the right time and for the right reasons. With section 18 and 19 of the ATA Code of
Conduct (2018) in mind, it can be argued that those wishing to become part of the teaching
profession should be inherently predisposed to practical wisdom and upholding the ethical values
of Virtue Ethics. As DeMitchell (2011) states, teachers are in loco parentis, generally spend more
time with students over the week than any other authority figure and are part of the only
profession that has power and control over minors with the full extent of the government laws
behind them. Because of this, the ethical implications of teachers off-duty behaviour are of great
concern to parents and the greater community. Referring to the Code of Conduct (2018), it can be
argued that actions aligned with maintaining the “honour and dignity of the profession” require a
teacher to possess a certain virtuous character, and therefore ethical decisions made regarding
conduct both during and outside of school hours originate within one’s fundamental, true
character. In addition, teachers are in a position to not only role model ethical behaviour and
decision making, but to teach moral and ethical awareness to their students (J. K. Donlevy,
personal communication, October 23rd, 2018). Hence, the Virtue School of Ethics approach is
best suitable in the matter of ethical implications involved with teacher behaviour after school
Deontological Ethics
Deontological Ethics is based on whether the action itself is right or wrong rather than
being based on the consequences of the action (J. K. Donlevy, personal communication, October
23rd, 2018). Therefore, a person adhering to a Deontological approach in ethical decision making
must always “do the right thing” even if it produces more negative outcomes than doing the
“wrong thing” would (J. K. Donlevy, personal communication, October 23rd, 2018). This
approach operates with the categorical imperative, where an ethical decision made “must be
universally applicable to all persons including the decision maker” (J. K. Donlevy, personal
communication, October 23rd, 2018). This school of ethics reinforces that all people have inherent
value and worth and should not be not be treated as a means to an end, but rather as an end in
themselves. The Alberta Teachers’ Association Code of Conduct (2018) states that teachers must
act in a manner that maintains the dignity and honour of the Profession, and therefore, teachers are
bound to make sure their actions uphold the honour of the profession whether it is during school
hours or off duty regardless of what the consequence might be. As teachers are in loco parentis
where parents entrust their children to teachers for majority of the day (DeMitchell, 2011), they
owe a duty to students, parents and the public. Teachers are held to a high standard in society, as
they are role models and authority figures for students. If the teacher’s immorality off hours
negatively impacts the school community, what they stand for, and the perception the students
have of them, then their interests are superseded by that of society and the school community
(Fulmer, 2002). Hence, the Deontological School of Ethics approach is a best suitable in the
matter of ethical implications involved with teacher behaviour after school hours and off school
premises.
ETHICS 6
In summary, we find Deontological and Virtue Ethics approaches are most suited to
addressing the ethical behaviour of off duty teachers. The teaching profession is held at a higher
moral standard than any other profession due to the very fact that teachers act in loco parentis. It is
a difficult line to walk, however those wishing to become part of the profession must accept that
their behaviour outside of school hours has implications on their relationships with students,
parents and the community as a whole. Whether teachers wish to accept this or not is a personal
choice. However, trust is imperative in the teaching profession, and once lost it is very hard to
gain back. Those wishing to join the profession must take this into heavy consideration.
ETHICS 7
References
https://www.teachers.ab.ca/About%20the%20ATA/UpholdingProfessionalStandards/Profes
sionalConduct/Pages/CodeofProfessionalConduct.aspx
Buzzelli, C. & Johnston, B. (2001). Teacher and Teacher Education. Retrieved from:
http://media.journals.elsevier.com/content/files/s0742051x10001587-04220948.pdf
DeMitchell, T.A. (2011). “Immorality, teacher private conduct, and adverse notoriety: A needed
Fulmer, J. (2002). Dismissing the immoral teacher for conduct outside the workplace – Do current
laws protect the interests of both school authorities and teachers? Journal of Law and