Baseline Survey - Vitnam Fisheries Ap064e ADA p30

REGIONAL FISHERIES LIVELIHOODS PROGRAMME
FOR SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA (RFLP) – VIET NAM

---------------------------------------------------------
BASELINE SURVEY
VOLUME 1:
BASELINE SURVEY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGIES
Activity 4.1.1: Survey of income and gender situation in target communes

Activity 4.1.2: Identification of needs and priorities
For the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme

for South and Southeast Asia – Viet Nam
Prepared by
Truong Van Tuyen, Ph.D.

Ho Thi Thanh Nga, M.Sc.
Centre for Community Research and Development (CCRD)
Thua Thien Hue, April 2011

Baseline Survey Volume 1: Baseline Survey Design and Methodologies
This publication has been made with the financial support of the Spanish Agency of
International Cooperation for Development (AECID) through an FAO trust-fund project, the
Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (RFLP) for South and Southeast Asia -
GCP/RAS/237/SPA. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of AECID, FAO, RFLP, or MARD.
All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product
for educational and other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written
permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged.
Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes
is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such
permission should be addressed to:
Chief
Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch
Communication Division
FAO
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
or by e-mail to:
copyright@fao.org
© FAO 2011
For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as:
Truong, V. T., & Ho, T. T. N. (2011). Baseline Survey Volume 1: Baseline Survey Design
and Methodologies. Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia
(GCP/RAS/237/SPA) Field Project Document 2011/VIE/4.
1
Table of Contents
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. 2
List of Acronyms ....................................................................................................................... 3
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 4
I. Background of the baseline survey......................................................................................... 5
II. Survey design and methodology ........................................................................................... 5
2.1 Overall baseline survey design and methodology ........................................................... 5
2.2 Survey sites ..................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 7
2.3.1 Survey samples by methodology ............................................................................. 7
2.3.2 Household survey (questionnaire survey) .............................................................. 7
2.3.3 Group discussion ..................................................................................................... 7
2.3.4 Key informant interview .......................................................................................... 7
2.4 Data registration, processing, and analysis ..................................................................... 8
2.5 Survey team and organization ......................................................................................... 8
2.6 Reporting ......................................................................................................................... 9
Annexes.................................................................................................................................... 10
Annex 1: List of data / indicators under five outputs .......................................................... 11
Annex 2: Household interview questionnaire .................................................................... 29
Annex 3: List of secondary data to be collected and the checklists for key informant
interviews and group discussion ......................................................................................... 41
List of Tables
Table 1: A list of the RFLP target communes ........................................................................... 6
Table 2: Total number of surveyed communes, meetings, and respondents in three provinces
.................................................................................................................................. 7
Table 3: Number of questions of each section in the questionnaire .......................................... 7
2
List of Acronyms
CCRD Centre for Community Research and Development
DARD Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
LOA Letter of Agreement
PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal
RFLP Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme
SDECAFIREP Sub-Department of Capture Fisheries and Resources Protection
SRDAFIQA Sub-Department of Rural Development and Agro-Forestry-Fisheries
Quality Assurance
3
Acknowledgements
We thank the participation of many individuals and officials in the Regional Fisheries
Livelihoods Programme (RFLP) target areas and three control communes for sharing with us
their insights, perspectives, information, and data. Our thanks also go to the RFLP National
Coordination Office in Hue and the RFLP Provincial Management Units for their cooperation
and assistance.
This survey was conducted by the Centre for Community Research and Development
(CCRD) under the technical advices, coordination, and management of Dr. Truong Van
Tuyen, the director of CCRD in cooperation with the survey team from CCRD and the
Faculty of Extension and Rural Development at Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry.
The survey group consisted of:
Quang Tri Province Survey Group: Dr. Le Thi Hoa Sen - Group leader
M.Sc. Ho Le Phi Khanh
Thua Thien Hue Province Survey Group: M. Sc. Ho Thi Thanh Nga - Group leader
M. Sc. Nguyen Thi Thanh Huong
Quang Nam Province Survey Group: Dr. Nguyen Viet Tuan - Group leader
M. Sc. Tong Thi Hai Hanh
and a group of enumerators.
4
I. Background of the baseline survey

The Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (RFLP) is an FAO trust-fund project funded
by the Kingdom of Spain, started in September 2009. It covers six countries of Cambodia,
Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam and is planned for four
years. The aim of the RFLP is to strengthen capacity among participating small-scale fishing
communities and their supporting institutions towards improved livelihoods and sustainable
fisheries resources management. At the national level, the RFLP is expected to produce five
outputs including:
(1) Co-management mechanisms for sustainable utilization of fishery resources;

(2) Improved safety and reduced vulnerability for fisher communities;
(3) Improved quality of fishery products and market chains;
(4) Strengthened and diversified income opportunities for fisher families; and
(5) Facilitated access to microfinance services for fishers, processors and vendors.
Under the above framework, the baseline survey was planned to fulfill RLFP Activity 4.1.1
“Survey of income and gender situation in selected target communes” and Activity 4.1.2
“Identification of needs and priorities” under sub-output 4.1 of the 2010 work plan approved
by National Coordination Committee of the RFLP. The overall objectives of the baseline
survey were to obtain better understanding of socio-economic situation of the target
communes and to collect the baseline data for each of the five RFLP outputs, which will
provide the basis for progress monitoring and evaluation. Under these overall objectives, the
specific objectives of the survey were:
1. To develop the sub-indicators for the baseline survey, fully reflecting the local
conditions in target provinces in Viet Nam, for 5 RFLP outputs
2. To develop complete survey methodologies including field-tested questionnaires for
the defined sub-indicators
3. To collect data for the defined sub-indicators under RFLP outputs 1-5 for Viet Nam
4. To perform an in-depth analysis of data to set the baseline under each output
5. To organize a validation workshop in each province
The Centre for Community Research and Development (CCRD) is contracted under the
LOA-FAVIE 56/2010 to conduct the above baseline survey in sixteen RFLP target
communes and three control communes in three provinces (Quang Tri, Thua Thien Hue, and
Quang Nam) in Viet Nam.
II. Survey design and methodology
2.1 Overall baseline survey design and methodology

The survey was designed to cover five outputs of RFLP. Under each output, a list of data to
be collected was developed with clear indication of data sources and data collection
methodologies (see Annex 1). Based on the data list, a questionnaire for household survey
and checklists for each group in key informant interview and group discussion were
developed. The checklists indicated the data to be collected or issued to be discussed as well
5
as leading questions (key questions to be asked) including list of secondary data to be

collected.
To gather information and data for five outputs, different data collection methods were used
including a) community consultation through group discussion and household interview, b)
household survey using questionnaire, c) key informant interview using checklists, and d)
collection of secondary data. The survey applied methodologies including group discussion,
structured interview, semi-structured interview, and some PRA tools such as Venn Diagram,
Gender Analysis Matrix, Time Trends. The same survey process and methodologies were
used for all surveyed communities.
2.2 Survey sites

The target areas for this baseline survey were as follows: Those communes were official
target communes of the RFLP project (Table 1).
Table 1: A list of the RFLP target communes

Thua Thien Hue Quang Nam Quang Tri
Phu Thuan - Phu Vang Duy Hai - Duy Xuyen Hai An - Hai Lang
Vinh Thanh - Phu Vang Duy Nghia - Duy Xuyen Hai Khe - Hai Lang
Loc Tri - Phu Loc Binh Hai - Thang Binh Trieu Van - Trieu Phong
Phu Loc Town - Phu Loc Binh Minh - Thang Binh Trieu Lang - Trieu Phong
Phong Hai - Phong Dien Binh Nam - Thang Binh Vinh Thai - Vinh Linh
Tam Tien - Nui Thanh
The following three additional communes were also surveyed as control communes:
1. Phu Hai commune - Phu Vang district – Thua Thien Hue Province
2. Vinh Thach Commune - Vinh Linh district – Quang Tri Province
3. Tam Hoa commune - Nui Thanh district - Quang Nam Province
The control communes were selected from the lists of coastal communes in three provinces
The selection of the control communes was carried out in consultation with SDECAFIREPin
three provinces and based on the following criteria:
 The commune must have at least 30 fishing households

 The social and economic features of the control communes are most similar to that of
RFLP target communes. For this, the control communes is located near to RFLP target
communes is preferred.
 There are at least two different fishing activities (offshore fishing inshore fishing, lagoon
fishing, etc) in each of the control commune.
 Commune having fish processing households is preferred
After control communes were selected, consultations with the People’s Communes of the
control communes were done to make sure that these communes satisfy about criteria. The
list of control communes was then submitted in RFLP Coordination Team in Hue for
approval.
6
2.3 Data Collection

2.3.1 Survey samples by methodology
Table 2 shows the sample size for the survey in the target and control communes by survey
methodology:
Table 2: Total number of surveyed communes, meetings, and respondents in three provinces
# meetings # Key # Other
# # household (group informants respondents
Province
communes survey discussion (officials and (individual
with villagers) mass org. staff) interview)
Quang Tri 6 188 (73) 24 31 (9) 9 (7)
Thua Thien Hue 6 195 (80) 24 26 (8) 20 (12)
Quang Nam 7 218 (44) 28 42 (15) 12 (6)
Total 19 601 (197) 96 99 (32) 41 (25)
Note: the figures in brackets show the numbers of female respondents.
2.3.2 Household survey (questionnaire survey)
Household survey was carried out in sixteen target communes and three control communes
using a questionnaire (Annex 2). The questionnaire was structured into six sections including
a general section and five sections for each of five outputs as summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Number of questions of each section in the questionnaire

Section Module Number of questions
0 General information 9
1 Co-management 14
2 Safety at sea 11
3 Post harvest and marketing 9
4 Livelihood diversification and enhancement 14
5 Microfinance 12
In each commune, 30-35 fishing households were surveyed including off-shore, inshore, on-
shore, and lagoon fishing households. The survey covered poor and non-poor as well as
males and females. The survey households were selected randomly from the list of fishing
households provided by Commune People’s Committees and survey team.
2.3.3 Group discussion
In each commune, four group discussion sessions with 6-8 people each were organized,
including two sessions with males and two sessions with females. The groups were facilitated
to discuss the issues related to five outputs. The checklist for group discussion is attached as
Annex 3.
2.3.4 Key informant interview
The key informants from the following institutions were interviewed:
Province level:
7
 Sub-Department of Capture Fisheries and Resources Protection at DARD

(SDECAFIREP)
 Sub-Department of Rural Development and Agro-Forestry-Fisheries Quality Assurance
at DARD (SRDAFIQA)
 Provincial Committee for Flood and Storm Control and Search and Rescue
 Provincial Fisheries Association
District level:
 Microfinance providers
 District DARD
 District Station for Agriculture - Forestry - Fisheries Extension
 District Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Commune level:
 Commune People’s Committee (staff in charge of economic development and/or
fisheries)
 Local Fisheries Associations (if available)
 Microfinance providers (Woman Union, Farmer Union, and other credit groups).
In addition to the above, fish processors and boat builders were interviewed. In each
commune where there were fish processors, 2-4 fish processors were interviewed
individually. In order to double-check and/or supplement data, household/individual
interviews were also conducted with fishers, boat builders, and fish vendors.
The checklists for key informant interviews are attached as Annex 4.
2.4 Data registration, processing, and analysis

The survey teams recorded data / information in the data collection sheets (questionnaire and
hand written data / information sheets) for double checking and/or clarification. The collected
data / information were then entered into a database and organized by category and informant
group under each output for respective commune. They were then summarized at the
province level by indicator and informant group.
Quantitative data were processed, analyzed and organized in tables by using SPSS 12.0 and
Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistical values including frequency counts, percentage, min
value, max value, and average was calculated in order to explain distribution and general
characteristics of each commune in five output areas. Qualitative information was used to
provide in-depth description of and analysis for each output and to compliments the
quantitative data.
2.5 Survey team and organization

The survey was conducted by a team composed of three sub-groups implementing the survey
in each of three target provinces. The team leader designed the overall survey and
coordinated the three sub-groups, which had 4-6 people including group leaders, facilitators,
and enumerators. The fieldwork was carried out during November and December 2010.
8
2.6 Reporting
The report was produced for each province (i.e. three volumes for three target province), and
four volumes have been prepared including a volume on survey design and methodologies
(this report).
Volume 1: Baseline Design and Methodologies

volume 2: Baseline Survey Results in Quang Tri Province
volume 3: Baseline Survey Results in Thua Thien Hue Province
volume 4: Baseline Survey Results in Quang Nam Province
The survey result reports (Volume 2-4) consist of three main sections including:
I. Profile of surveyed communes and households

II. Baseline analysis of five outputs
III. Proposed RFLP output indicators
9
Annexes
10
Annex 1: List of data / indicators under five outputs
OUTPUT 1: FISHERIES CO-MANAGEMENT (FCM)
Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser Data source Tools / techniques
The current understanding and expectations Degree of awareness of the very aware / Fishers HH survey (questionaire)
of the concept “co-management” among term FCM by local fishers / aware / not aware PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
each key stakeholder group (fishers, Government Dept / Policy District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
government department, policy makers). Makers CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Degree of understading of the Could be single Fishers Group discussion
term FCM by local fishers / answer questions PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Government Dept / Policy or oral expression District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Makers CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Degree of overall usefullness No idea / very Fishers HH survey (questionaire)
of FCM in fisheries resources useful / useful / PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
management by local fishers / not useful District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Government staff / Policy CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
makers
Degree of overall usefullness No idea / very Fishers HH survey (questionaire)
of FCM in fisheries livelihoods useful / useful / PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
improvement by local fishers / not useful District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Government Dept / Policy CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Makers
The sorts of existing policies and Existence and nature of polices Yes / no and PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
institutions that support or inhibit co- on FCM Implementation at description District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
management and areas for strengthening province / district / commune / CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
them (including policies on Gender local levels
Mainstreaming) Existence and nature of yes / no and Fishers Group discussion
institutions providing support description PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
on FCM District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Perceived inhibition and Yes / no and PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
restriction on FCM description District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
implementation by policies and CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
institutions at province /
district / commune / local
levels
Recommendations for Description PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
strengthening the policies and District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
institutions related to FCM CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
The attitudes and perceptions of fishers to Existence and nature of formal Yes / no and FishersPFA, Group discussionIndividual interview (semi-
formal and traditional management systems / informal management system description- SFREP District structured interview)Individual interview (semi-
and conflict resolution systems. in fishery resources management level DARD CPC, structured interview)Individual interview (semi-
management and use (district, CFA structured interview)
commune, local)-
Stakeholders of
the systems- How
long was it set up
(years)- Degree of
their
implementation (1
- 5)- Degree of
their impact on
fishery resources
management
Degree of usefulness / Very useful / Fishers HH survey and Group discussion
effectiveness of formal / useful / not useful
informal management system / no idea
by fishers
Degree of conflict between Yes/ no and Fishers Group discussion
formal and informal systems Description CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Stakeholder practices in current Existence and nature of fishery Yes / no and Fishers Group discussion
management systems and recommendations management plans / activities Description PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
for improvements. prepapred by stakeholders District DARD / Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
ES Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
CPC, CFA
12
Degree of fishers' and - Active Fishers HH survey

instituions' participation in participation Fishers Group discussion
planning / implementation / (sharing and PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
monitoring of FM plans / consutlating) District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
activties - Passive CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
participation
(participated
because being
invited)
- No participation
Degree/extent of fisher Very satisfied / Fishers HH survey
satisfaction with management satisfied / not
activities and their satisfied
implementation
Recommendations for Description Fishers Group discussion
improvements of practices in PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
management systems District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Current systems for conflict resolution – Existence and nature of Yes / no and FishersPFA, Group discussionIndividual interview (semi-
including details of how systems are conflict management systems description- SFREP District structured interview)Individual interview (semi-
currently used at different level Formal / informal DARDCPC, structured interview)Individual interview (semi-
- Legal status (if CFA structured interview)
violator will be
punished by local
authorities / law
under the
system)-
Operators /
administrator
(province/
district/
commune/local)-
Stakeholders-
When was it
established-
System mechnism
and organization
13
Degree of effectiveness of Very effective, Fishers HH survey and Group discussion

these systems on conflict effective, not PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
management by fishers and effective, no idea District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
institutions CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
The current numbers and types of Number of FAs and FA Number PFA and CFA Secondary data
stakeholder involvement in fisheries members in the province
management Number of fishing rights Number PFA Secondary data
allocated in the province
Existence and nature of Yes / no and SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Province Fishery Association description
Method of stakeholder Type of methods Fishers Group discussion
involvement in FM used by (consultation SFREP, PFA, Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
authorities meetings, etc.) District DARD, Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
CPC
% of fishers participating in % Fishers HH survey
any fishery management
meeting during the last six
months
The perceptions of fishers and resource Perception on productivity of Decrease, Fishers HH survey and group discussion
managers relating to the state of the fisheries resources by fishers increase, stable, SFREP, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
fisheries resources and allocation of benefits and government during the last no idea
from fisheries. and next five years
Perception on CPUE (catch per Decrease, Fishers HH survey and group discussion
unit effort) by fishers and increase, stable, SFREP, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
government during the last and no idea (Effort =
next five years amount of time)
Perception on diversity of Decrease, Fishers HH survey and group discussion
fisheries resources during the increase, stable, SFREP, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
last and next five years by no idea
fishers and government
Perception on lagoon and sea Decrease, FishersSFREP, HH survey and group discussionIndividual
water polution by fishers / increase stable, no CFA interview (semi-structured interview)
government during the last and idea
next five years
14
Perception on current fishing Decrease, Fishers HH survey and group discussion

capacity by fishers increase stable, no SFREP, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
/government during the last idea (e.g. Number
and next five years of fishing gears)
Degree of equity in access of 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
fisheries resources among (very high, high, PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
resources user groups by average, low, not District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
fishers / resources managers at all) CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
Degree of equity in allocation 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
of fisheries benefits among (very high, high, PFA, SFREP Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
resources user groups by average, low, not District DARD Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
fishers / resources managers at all) CPC, CFA Individual interview (semi-structured interview)
15
OUTPUT 2: SAFETY AT SEA (SAS)
The safety at sea Existence and nature of safety at sea (SAS) and Yes / no and description Fishers Group discussion
information and disaster disaster preparedness information (regulations, SFREP, Individual interview (semi-
preparedness information guidelines, mateials, etc.) available to small scale District DARD structured interview)
that is currently produced. fishers CPC Individual interview (semi-
structured interview)
The information on safety Degree of awareness on availability of SAS Very aware / aware / not Fisher HH survey
at sea that stakeholders information by government agencies / local aware District DARD, Individual interview (semi-
(govt to community) use authories / community organization / fishers CPC structured interview)
and how they access this. Individual interview (semi-
Degree of accessibility to information on SAS by very high, high, average, Fisher HH survey
government agencies / local authories / low, not at all with reasons District DARD, Individual interview (semi-
community organization / fishers CPC structured interview)
Individual interview (semi-
Existence of different channel for SAS List Fisher Group discussion
information access District DARD, Individual interview (semi-
CPC structured interview)
Degree of fisher and fovernment satisfaction Very sactisfied / sactisfied / Fisher HH survey
with certain types of these channels not sactisfied District DARD Individual interview (semi-
Degree of usefullness of certain type of Vey useful, useful, not Fisher HH survey
information on SAS by government agencies / useful, no idea District DARD, Individual interview (semi-
local authories / community organization / fishers CPC structured interview)
The levels of awareness of Existence and nature of SAS measures (by Yes / no and description Fishers Group discussion
fishers, their household government regulations / local regualtion / SFREP, Individual interview (semi-
members and government customary regulations / experiences) District DARD structured interview)
staff regarding safety at CPC, Individual interview (semi-
16
sea measures in fishing structured interview)

communities. Individual interview (semi-
Degree of awareness on certain SAS measures by vey aware / aware / not Fisher Group discussion
fishers and government staff aware District DARD, Individual interview (semi-
Current legal frameworks / Existence and nature of guidelines / frameworks Yes / no and description Fishers Group discussion
guidance for safety at sea for SAS measures SFREP, Individual interview (semi-
measures. District DARD structured interview)
CPC, Individual interview (semi-
Current levels of Degree of fisher compliance with SAS Yes /no for top ten key Fishers HH survey
awareness / compliance regulations safety requirements (rather
with safety regulations. than equipment)(Percentage
of fishers x number of safety-
at-sea regulations as
compared to total number of
fishers x total number of
safety-at-sea regulations)
Degree of boat safety Percentage of boats equipped Fishers HH survey
with basic safety items SFREP Secondary data
compared to total number of
esixting boats
Compliance with safety Existence and nature of measures in boat Yes / no and description SFREP Individual interview (semi-
measures in boat construction and in the yards by law / local Boat construction structured interview)
construction and in the authorities Co. Individual interview (semi-
yards where they are structured interview)
constructed (including the Degree of boat buider compliance with safety % complied and Description SFREP Individual interview (semi-
availability of data on measures Boat construction structured interview)
numbers and types of boat Co. Individual interview (semi-
where recorded and structured interview)
available). secondary data
17
Degree of fishing boat registration at province / Percentage of registered Fishers HH survey

district / commune level boats in fishing fleet SFREP Secondary data
Degree of inspection coverage Fishers HH survey
% of boat inspected during
SFREP Secondary data
operation (one year)(e.g for
safety equipment and
technical inspectation.
The systems for recording Exisistence and nature of guidelines / frameworks Responsible cooperative, Fisher Group discussion
accidents and details of for accident recording and reporting at province / procedures and systems PDMB / SFREP Individual interview (semi-
the numbers (where district / commune / community level District DARD structured interview)
recorded and who is CPC Individual interview (semi-
involved in reporting and structured interview)
recording). Individual interview (semi-
Numbe and types of fishing accidents reported Accident number and CPC, SFREP Secondary data
categories
The systems set up to Exisistence and nature of disaster/emergency Yes / no and description Fisher Group discussion
coordinate responses to response systems for at province / district / PDMB / SFREP Individual interview (semi-
safety issues and disasters. commune / community level District DARD structured interview)
CPC Individual interview (semi-
Degree of effectiveness of these systems in very effective, effective, not FisherCPC HH survey and group
disaster preparedness and promoting safety issues effective discussionIndividual interview
by fisher / community/local authority (semi-structured interview)
Perceptions of fishers and Trend (in number) of accidents at sea during last Increase, decrease, stable, no Fishers Group discussion
community members three years perceived by fishers idea
about numbers, causes and The most common causes of accidents at sea Ranking Fishers Group discussion
severity of accidents at sea during the last three years
in targeted communities.
Degree of severity of accidents (interms of lost Sereve (human death); Fishers Group discussion
materials and human) at sea during the last three Average (physical damage),
years by fishers and community minor (minor or no damange)
The current disaster Exisistence and nature of guidelines / frameworks Yes / no and description PDMB, SFREP Individual interview (semi-
preparedness systems in / circulars on disaster preparedness at province / District DARD structured interview)
use and the facilities in district / commune / community level CPC Individual interview (semi-
place to utilize. structured interview)
18
Existence of plans / activities on disaster Yes / no and description Fishers Group discussion
preparedness at commune / community level CPC Individual interview (semi-
Degree of impementation of these plans / activties fully implemented / mostly / Fishers Group discussion
by fisher / community / commune staff partly / not implemented CPC Individual interview (semi-
Existence and nature of existing facilities for Yes / no and description Fishers Group discussion
disaster preparedness at commune / community CPC Individual interview (semi-
levels structured interview)
Degree of utilization / access of certain facilities 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
evaluated by commune authorities / fishers / CPC Individual interview (semi-
community structured interview)
Degree of usefulness / quality of certain facilities 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
evaluated by commune authorites / fishers / CPC Individual interview (semi-
community structured interview)
The level of confidence of Level of fisher confidence in avoiding accidents 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
fishers to avoid accidents Level of fisher confidence in dealing with 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
at sea and if necessary to accidents
recover from them.
Percentage of fisher who were trained in avoiding % Fishers HH survey
and dealing with accidents
19
OUTPUT 3: POST HARVEST AND MARKETING (PH&M)

The current levels of post-harvest Degee of fisher awareness of certain post- Very aware / aware / not aware Fishers HH survey
skills, knowledge and practices. havest methods
Degree of application of certain methods in Fully appled / mostly / partly / not Fishers HH survey
maintaining fish quality after havesting by applied
fishers / proccessors
Percentage of fishers / processors who % Fishers HH survey
attended at least one training course on
preservation / primary processing of fish
Post-harvest facilities available and Availability of post-havest facilities to fishers Yes / no Fishers HH survey
being used by fisher communities. Quality of existing facilities Working / not woking / new / old / Fishers HH survey
very old
Degree of use of existing facilities for post Very often / often / rarely / never Fishers HH survey
havest practices
Quality of selected fish products in Percentage of selected fish products meeting (Percentage of the production of District DARD Secondary data
selected market chains against national national / international safety standards selected fish products in selected DARD (sub-
(or international if needed) standards. market chains that meet national / deaprtment of
export standards) agri. and
(For example: 50% of black tiger fishery product
shrimp production meet export quality
standards) control???)
Current per capita consumption of fish National / provincial / local per capita Per capita consumption of fish Provicncial / Secondary data
locally and nationally (where figures consumption of fish District statitic
or proxy figures exist). offices / DARD
The distribution and use of fish and Distribution of local fish and fisheries products Percentage of production / amount Fishers HH survey
fisheries products from the project site in local, national, and international markets of selected fish / fisheries products DARD Secondary data
in local and national markets. that is consumed locally, in
provincial market, in national
market and in international market)
20
Types of immediate buyers of fish and fishery Percentage of selected fish / Fishers HH survey and group
products from the fishers / processors fisheries product production that discussion
are sold to midlemen, processing
plants, local market, other
Percentage of fish used for different purposes Unused, HH immediate Fishers Group discussion
consumption, feed for fish / animal; Secondary data
processing for HH consumption,
processing for selling, local
consumption, export
Degree of perceived influence on the Degree of influence on the market price of 1-5 evaluation Fishers and Group discussion
market by fishers and fish processers. selected fish products by fishers / processors processors
Degree of fisher/processor's dependance on 1-5 evaluation Fishers and Group discussion
midleperson processors
Existing policies related to post- Existence and nature of policies on fisheries Yes/ no and description Fishers Group discussion
harvest fisheries and institutions that post-havest handling CPC, CFA Individual interview
influence post-harvest fisheries. Distict agencies (semi-structured
DARD interview)
Individual interview
Degree of implementation of fisheries post- 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
havest policies / guidelines by province / CPC, CFA Individual interview
district / commune authorities and fishers Distict agencies Individual interview
DARD Individual interview
Existence and nature of fisheries post-havest Yes / no and description Fishers Group discussion
institutions at province / district / commune CPC, CFA Individual interview
level Distict agencies Individual interview
DARD Individual interview
Degree of fisher / proccessor satisfaction with Very sactisfied / sactisfied / not Fishers HH survey
fisheries post-havest institutions sactisfied
Current levels of funding and staff Amount and percentage of government / non- Number and % CPC, District secondary data
deployed for post-harvest in project government budget available to support post- agencies,
communities. harvest fisheries at province / district / DARD
commune levels
21
Number and percentage of government Number and % CPC, District secondary data
officers working on post-harvest fisheries at agencies,
province / district / commune / community DARD
level
The knowledge and skills of the Number / Percentage of officers working on Numbe and % CPC, District secondary data
government staff with respect to post post - havest fisheries who have been formally agencies,
harvest fisheries. / informally trained in post havest skills and DARD
techniques
Degree of confidence of officers working on Very confident / confident / not CPC, District Individual interview
post - havest fisheries in performing post- confident agencies,
havest techniques / giving instructions on post DARD
- havest practices
22
OUTPUT 4: LIVELIHOODS ENHANCEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION (LE&D)
Livelihood activities (including Type and importance of fishery related livelihood Ranking / 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
women and children; and the very activties elated livelihood activties by different groups
poor and marginalised) (under (men, women, children, poor, better off, marginized...)
input 1 in TOR and same as item
(i) of output 4)
Degree of fishers perception about present livelihood Better, no change, get Fishers HH survey
option compared to five years ago worse, no idea
Average income according to the Average annual household income from different Range of annual income Fishers HH survey
livelihood activity (Item (i) of livelihood activities by livelihood acticity
output 5)
Gender roles and responsibilities Degree of involvenment in livelihood and housechold 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
within the target communities activties and amount of working hours of men and
(under input 1 in TOR); women in family
Degree of men and women roles in making decisions Primary role, secondary Fishers Group discussion
in livelihood and housechore activties role, no role
Degree of involvement of men and women in 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
implementation in decided activities
Perceptions of prosperity of fishers Fishers and communities definitions about prosperity Description Fishers Group discussion
and household members in pilot Fishers and community perception on standards of poor Description Fishers Group discussion
communities. HHs / rich HHs.
Attitudes towards changing or Degree of fisher satisfaction with their existing Very sactisfied / sactisfied Fishers HH survey
diversifying livelihoods in pilot livelihoods / not sactisfied
communities. Average number of livelihood activties per HH Number of livelihood Fishers HH survey
activities
Degree of fisher / community desire for changing / 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
diversifying livelihood
23
Factors that seem to help or inhibit Existence and nature of existing factors that seem to Yes / no and description FishersDistrict through group
livelihood change in target help livelihood change in target communes DARD / ESCPC, discussion with
communities. CFA, mass SWOT
organization
Existence and nature of existing factors that seem to Yes / no and description Fishers through group
inbibit livelihood change in target communes District DARD / ES discussion with
CPC, CFA, mass SWOT
organization
The availability of supporting Existence and nature of supporting servcies for small- Yes / no and description Fishers Groups discussion
services for livelihood scale fishers' livelihood enhancement and District DARD / ES Individual interview
enhancement and diversification diversification at province / district / commune / local CPC, CFA, mass (semi-structured
available in pilot communities. levels organization interview)
(semi-structured
interview)
Degree of fisher awareness of the availability of certain vey aware / aware / not Fishers HH survey
supporting services aware
Degree of fisher access possibility to certain suppoting 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
servcies
Fishers and their household Degree of fisher satisfaction (quality and cost) on Very satisfied / satisfied / Fishers HH survey
member’s perceptions and levels of existing supporting services for livelihood not satisfied
satisfaction regarding the enhancement and diversification
supporting services for livelihood Degree of of usefulness of certain suppoting services Fishers HH survey
enhancement and diversification for livelihood enhancement and diversification
available in the pilot communities 1-5 evaluation
Degree of confidence in changing or diversifying the Very confident / confident Fishers HH survey
livelihood with the use of existing services / not confident
24
OUTPUT 5: MICRO FINANCE (MF)
Levels of awareness for accessing Degree of fisher's awareness on availability of formal Very aware / aware / Fishers HH survey
financial services in pilot and informal credit programmes not aware
communities. Degree of general accessibility to credit servcies when 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
in need
Degree of fisher's awareness of regulations for accessing Very aware / aware / Fishers HH survey
certain credit programmes not aware
Current formal financial Existence and nature of formal financial institutions Yes / no and Fishers Group discussion
institutions operating in the available to local fishers description Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
project areas, their perception of agencies (Mass (semi-structured
the fisheries activities and the organizations) interview)
proportion of fisher folks among
Level of priority of fisheries activities compared to other Priority order of Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
their local clientele base.
activties by formal financial institutions fishery activties as agencies (Mass (semi-structured
compared to other organizations) interview)
activities Bank credit staff
(semi-structured
interview)
Proportion of fishers among local clientele base of % Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
certain formal financial institutions agencies (Mass (semi-structured
organizations) interview)
Bank credit staff
(semi-structured
interview)
25
Degree of evaluation of perceived risk of different 1-5 evaluation Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
fisheries activities by formal financial institutions agencies (Mass (semi-structured
Bank credit staff
(semi-structured
interview)
Degree of repayment of fisheries activities by formal % Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
financial institutions agencies (Mass (semi-structured
Bank credit staff
(semi-structured
interview)
Perception of the different formal Degree of fisher sactisfication with different formal Very sactisfied / Fishers HH survey
financial institutions by the financial institutions sactisfied / not
community members sactisfied
(requirements, repayment Level of difficulty of access to servcies provided by 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
procedures, proximity, interest different formal financial institutions
rates, etc.). Degree of perceived risk of borrowing money from 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
formal services by fishers
Current levels of borrowing and Maximum, minimum, and average size of savings and Maximum and Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
savings of the community loan provided by different formal financial institutions minimum size of loan agencies (Mass (semi-structured
members with formal financial to local fishers organizations)Bank credit interview)Individual
institutions (e.g. commercial staff interview (semi-structured
banks, rural banks, licensed interview)
microfinance institutions, etc.)
Proportion of fishers with the saving and loan with % Bank credit intermediary Individual interview
formal finanacial Institutions agencies (Mass (semi-structured
Bank credit staff
(semi-structured
interview)
26
Level of savings at formal financial institutions Range of saving Fishers HH survey

Level of loan at formal financial institutions Range of loan Fishers HH survey
Existing informal mechanisms Existence and nature of informal mechanisms used to Description Fishers Group discussion
used to access credit (Rotating access credit at commune / community levels
Savings and Credit Associations
Degree of fish sactisfication with different informal Very sactisfied / Fishers HH survey
{ROSCAs}, moneylenders,
credit mechanisms sactisfied / not
relatives, middlemen, etc.), their
sactisfied
respective perceptions and levels
Level of accessibility to different informal mechinisms 1-5 evaluation Fishers HH survey
of satisfaction by the fisheries
communities. Degree of perceived risk of borrowing money from 1-5 evaluation Fishers Group discussion
informal services by fishers
Degree of fisher preference of informal mechnisms and % go for informal Fishers HH survey
formal mechanism formal mechanisms
Comparative access of women to Degree of access of different formal finanacial servcies % Fishers HH survey
(formal and informal) financial by women and men during the last three years
services. Degree of access of different informal finanacial % Fishers HH survey
servcies by women and men during the last three years
Recent or current access of the Existence and nature of subsidized credit lines in Yes / no and Fishers Group discussion
community members to province / distirct / commune / community Description DPC, CPC Individual interview
(government) subsidized credit Banks (semi-structured
lines. interview)
(semi-structured
interview)
Degree of fisher awareness of different subsidized credit Very aware / aware / Fishers HH survey
lines not aware
Degree of fisher accessibility to subsidized credit lines % accessed as Fishers HH survey
compared tot total
fishers; % accessed as
compared to total
fishers eligible to
access
Potential for savings mobilization Degree of fisher perception of importance of making Very important / Fishers HH survey / Group
(“saving culture”, savings gap, savings important / not discussion
use of informal ways, etc.) important
27
Degree of fisher willingness of making savings Very willing / willing Fishers HH survey / Group
not willing discussion
Fisher saving capacity Maximum amount per Fishers HH survey / Group
month that fisher can discussion
save
General level of donations from Level of financial dependence of different microfinance Fully dependant / most Semi-credit organization Individual interview
which have beneficiated the institutions on donors dependant / partly (mass organizations) (semi-structured
existing microfinance institutions. dependant / Credit groups interview)
Resulting level of sustainability independent Individual interview
(e.g. measure of their Operational (semi-structured
Self Sufficiency) interview)
Level of technical dependence of different microfinance Fully dependant / most Semi-credit organization Individual interview
institutions on the donors dependant / partly (mass organizations) (semi-structured
dependant / Credit groups interview)
independent Individual interview
(semi-structured
interview)
Level of human resource dependence of different Fully dependant / most Semi-credit organization Individual interview
microfinance institutions on the donors dependant / partly (mass organizations) (semi-structured
dependant / Credit groups interview)
independent Individual interview
(semi-structured
interview)
28
Annex 2: Household interview questionnaire
This survey is conducted to set up a baseline for “Regional Fisher Livelihood

Programme” funded by Spanish Government. We highly appreciate if you could spend sometime
providing information related to your household livelihoods and fishing related issues. Your
name and information provided by you will be kept confidential for study purpose only
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUESTIONNAIRE CODE
INTERVIEWER
DATE
VILLAGE / COMMUNE / DISTRICT /

PROVINCE
0. GENERAL INFORMATION
0.1. Interviewee name

(optional)
0.2. Age
0.3. Sex  Male  Female

0.4. Classification of household
 Certified poor  Observed poor  Not poor
by prosperity
 Off shore fishing  Near shore fishing
0.5. Classification of Household
 In shore fishing  Inland fishing
by main career
 Aquaculture
0.6. Number of people in HH
0.7. Number of laborers in HH
0.8. Number of people in HH

working in fisheries
0.9. Types of fishing boat used
by HH (by capacity)
I. CO-MANAGEMENT
Understanding and expectations of the concept “co-management”
29
1.1. To what extent are you aware of the term Fishery Co-management (FCM)?
 Very aware  Aware  Not aware
1.2. What do you think about the overall usefulness of FCM in fisheries resources
management?
 Very useful  useful  not useful  No idea
1.3. What do you think about the overall usefulness of FCM in fisheries livelihoods
improvement?
 Very useful  useful  not useful  No idea
The attitudes and perceptions of fishers to formal and traditional management systems:
1.4. What do you think about the effectiveness of formal fishery management systems?
 Very effective  Effective  Not effective  No idea
1.5. What do you think about the effectiveness of informal fishery management systems?
 Very effective  Effective  Not effective  No idea
Practices in current management systems:
1.6. Which member in your family often participate in fishery management activities?
 Male  Female  Both  None
If no go to 1.9
1.7. To what extent did you participate in fishery management activities?

 Active participation  Passive participation  Not particiapte
1.8. During the last six months, did any member in your family attend any fishery management
meetings / activities?
 Yes  No  Don’t know
1.9. To what extent are you satisfied with current fishery management activities?
 Very satisfied  Satisfied  Not satisfied  No idea
Current systems for conflict resolution in fishery resource management and use:
1.10. What do you think about the effectiveness of the conflict management systems?
30
Very Effective Not effective No idea

effective
Informal systems    
Formal systems    
The perceptions on the state of the fisheries resources and allocation of benefits from
fisheries
1.11. What are your opinion about fisheries resources during the last five years?
Decrease Increase Stable No idea
Productivity of fish    
Diversity of fisheries resources    
Lagoon and sea water pollution    
Fishing capacity    
1.12. What are your opinion about fisheries resources during the next five years?
Decrease Increase Stable No idea
Productivity of fish    
Catch per unit effort productivity of    
fisheries resources
Diversity of fisheries resources    
Lagoon and sea water pollution    
Fishing capacity    
1.13. What do you think about level of the equity in getting benefits from fisheries among
different resource user groups?
 Equal  Not equal No idea
1.14. Who have more benefits from fishery resources?

Poor Non-poor The same No idea
   
Men Women The same No idea

   
II. SAFETY AT SEA
The information on safety at sea that fishers use and the ways to access this
31
2.1. To what extent are you aware of the availability of Safety at sea (SAS) information:
2.2. To what extent can you access to information on SAS

 Easy  Difficult  Not at all
2.3. To what extent are you satisfied with the following channels for accessing information on
safety at sea?
Information channels Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied
Radio   
Coastal communication /   
information station
Border Guard Wireless systems   
Television   
Commune broadcast system   
Personal communication   
equipment
2.4. How useful is the SAS information to your family ?

Type of SAS information Very useful Useful Not useful No idea
.....................   
.....................   
.....................   
.....................   
Awareness / compliance with safety regulations.
2.5. To what extent are you aware of the following basis safety at sea equipment on boat?
Basis safety equipment Very aware Aware Not aware
Life vest   
Lifebuoy   
Communication equipment   
Locating equipment   
Others   
2.6. Do you and your family members comply with the following regulations on safety at sea?
Regulations on safety at sea Yes No Not required
32
Shipping safety equipment   

Life vest   
Lifebuoy   
Communication equipment   
Fire fighting equipment   
Location equipment   
Trained staff in safety   
Valid ship driving license   
Valid boat registration certificate   
Valid staff registration certificates   
Engineer   
Boat registration:
2.7. During the last 12 months, how many inspections were made with your boat(s)
Times of random Times of
inspection periodical
inspection
Safety equipment inspection  
Technical inspection (engine)  
The systems set up to coordinate responses to safety issues and disasters.
2.8. What do you think about the effectiveness of the systems for responding safety issues and
disasters?
 Very effective  Effective  Ineffective  No idea
Confidence to avoid accidents at sea
2.9. Have you or your family members ever been trained in avoiding and dealing with accidents
at sea?
 Yes  No
2.10. How confident are you to avoid accidents at sea?

 Very confident  Confident  Not confident
2.11. How confident are you to deal with accidents at sea?

 Very confident  Confident  Not confident
III. POST HARVEST AND MARKETING
Post-harvest skills, knowledge and practices.
33
3.1. When are you your fish products applied post-harvest method to maintain their quality?
 On boat  On land  On boat and on land  Not at all
3.2. How skillful are you and your family in using the following post harvest methods
Post harvest methods Very aware Aware Not aware
Using ice   
Using chemicals   
Using salt   
Drying   
Grill   
3.3. To what extent does your family apply the following post harvest methods to the harvested
production ?
Post harvest methods Fully applied Partly applied Not applied
Using ice   
Using chemicals   
Using salt   
Drying   
Grilling   
3.4. Have you or your family members attended a training course on post harvest during the
last thee years?
 Yes  No
Post-harvest facilities available and being used:
3.5. Availability, status and utilization of post harvest facilities

Post harvest Availability Status Frequency of use
facilities
Yes No Working Not working Daily Sometime Rarely never
properly properly
Ice store on        
boat
Insulating        
box
Cold store        
Fridge        
Oven        
Drying oven        
Distribution and use of fish and fisheries products:
3.6. To whom did you sell your fish / fisheries products last year?
34
Products Fish frozen Middlemen Local Local Others (%) Don’t

factory (%) (%) Processing market know
enterprise (%) (%)
Shrimp
Crab
Green crab
Fish
Fresh squid
Dried quid
Dried fish
Grilled fish
Others
3.7. Where did you sell your fish / fisheries products last year?
Products Provincial National International Don’t know
market (%) Market (%) (%)
Shrimp
Crab
Green crab
Fish
Fresh squid
Dried quid
Dried fish
Grilled fish
Others
Influence on the market:
3.8. To what level do you depend on middlemen (on price) in trading fish / fisheries products?
Products High dependant Dependant Independent No idea
Shrimp    
Crab    
Green crab    
Fish    
Fresh squid    
Dried quid    
Dried fish    
Grilled fish    
Others    
Policies and institutions related to post-harvest fisheries:
35
3.9. To what extent are you satisfied with the support of the following institutions on post
harvest fisheries?
Institution Satisfied Not satisfied No idea
Sub-department of Rural   
Development and agricultural -
fishery product quality control
District trade departnment   
District DARD   
District extension station   
Fishery association   
Commune People Committee   
Mass organizations   
IV. LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION
Perception livelihood options
4.1. What do you think about the livelihood opportunities for fishing communities compared to
five years ago?
 Better  No change  Worse  No idea
Annual average income
4.2. Can you give an approximate income amount for the following livelihood activities in
2009?
Activities Income (mil dongs / year / HH)
Capture fisheries
Aquaculture
Agriculture (crop, livestock
and forestry)
Fishery processing
Others
Attitudes towards changing or diversifying livelihoods:
4.3. To what extent are you satisfied with your family current livelihoods?
 Satisfied  Not satisfied  No idea
4.4. Do you want to diversify your family livelihoods?

 Yes  No  No idea
Availability of supporting services for livelihood enhancement and diversification
36
4.5. To what extent are you aware of the supporting services for livelihood enhancement and
diversification?
4.6. To what extent can you access to the following supporting services for livelihood
enhancement and diversification?
Supporting services Easy Difficult Not at all No idea
Loan / credit    
Technical assistance    
Marketing    
Material supply    
Information about aquaculture
4.7. Aquaculture area? .................................. (ha)
4.8. When did your family start aquaculture farm? ...............................
4.9. What are common species kept in the pond?

Species
Black tiger 
Crab 
Fish 
Molluse 
Others 
4.10. Culture tecniques?

 Mono-species  Integated (multi-species)
 Intesive  Semi-intensive  Extensive
4.11. How profitable was it for your family aquaculture during the last three years?
 Profitable  Break even  Lost
Perceptions and levels of satisfaction regarding the supporting services for livelihood
enhancement and diversification
37
4.12. To what extent are you satisfied with the quality and cost of the following supporting
services for livelihood enhancement and diversification
Supporting services Satisfied Not satisfied No idea
Loan / credit   
Technical assistance   
Marketing   
Material supply   
4.13. Are the following supporting services useful for livelihood enhancement and
diversification
Types of supporting services Yes No No idea
Loan / credit   
Technical assistance   
Marketing   
Material supply   
4.14. To what extent are you confident to change or diversify your family livelihood with the
use of existing services?
 Confident  Not confident  No idea
V. MICROFINANCE
Awareness for accessing financial services
5.1. To what extent are you aware of the availability credit systems?
5.2. To what extent are you aware of regulations for accessing the following credit
programmes?
Credit programme of Very Aware Not aware
aware
Bank for Social Policies   
Agriculture Bank   
Other commercial banks   
NGOs, ODAs
Private
5.3. To what extent can you access to credit services when in need?
 High  Low  Not at all  No idea
Perception of the different informal and formal financial services:
38
5.4. To what extent are you satisfied with the following financial institutions?
Satisfied Not satisfied No idea
Bank for Social Policies   

Agriculture Bank   
Other commercial banks   
NGOs, ODAs   
Private   
5.5. Which credit mechanism do you most like to borrow money?

 Formal mechanisms  Semi-formal mechanisms  Informal mechanisms
Current levels of borrowing and savings of the community members with formal financial
institutions
5.6. During the last five years, which of the following financial services did you borrow
money?
Formal financial institutions Loan amount Saving amount
(VND) (VND)
Bank for Social Policies
Agriculture Bank
Other commercial banks
NGOs, ODAs -- --
Private -- ---
Access of subsidized credit lines
5.7. To what extent are you aware of the availability of the following subsidized credit lines
Subsidized credit lines Very Aware Not aware

aware
Credit for the poor   
Credit for students   
Credit for sanitation and water   
supply
Credit for boat building   
Credit for fishing materials   
5.8. Are you eligible to get loan from any above subsidized credit lines?
 Yes  No  No idea
5.9. Have you ever borrowed money from any of following subsidized credit lines during the
last three years?
39
 Yes  No
Potential for savings mobilization ((“saving culture”, savings gap, use of informal ways,
etc.)
5.10. In your opinion, how important is it for saving?

 Very important  Important  Not important
5.11. If there is a reliable and convenient financial organization for you to deposit your savings,
are you willing to make saving?
 Yes  No  Can’t decide
5.12. If yes, how much can your family mobilize for saving per month?
_________________VND
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your time and cooperation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40
Annex 3: List of secondary data to be collected and the checklists for key
informant interviews and group discussion
SECONDARY DATA TO BE COLLECTED
Data to be collected Data sources
COMMUNE PROFILE
Number of fishing villages / fisheries capture related villages CPC
Number / % poor HHs at commune and village levels CPC
Structure of HHs by livelihood activties CPC
Structure of labour by economic activities CPC
GDP by economic activities CPC
Number of marine fishing HHs / lagoon fishing HHs / aquaculture /
fish processors CPC
Number of fish processor enterprises CPC
Number of local fish collection midmen CPC
Number of fish market / CPC
OUTPUT 1: CO-MANAGEMENT
Number of FAs and FA members in the province / commune PFA and CFA
Number of fishing rights allocated in the province / commune PFA / District DARD
OUTPUT 2: SAFETY AT SEA
Number of existing boats by types (capacity) at province / commune
levels SFREP, CPC
Number of boats equipped with basic safety items at province / SFREP, CPC
commune level
Number of boat registered at province / commune level SFREP, CPC
Number of boats having valid inspection certificate at province / SFREP, CPC
commune level
Number of boats technically / physically inspected during operation in SFREP, CPC
2009 at provovince and commune levels
Number of boats having valid operational certificate at province and SFREP, CPC
commune levels
Numbe and types of fishing accidents at province / commune levels CPC, SFREP
OUTPUT 3: POST HARVEST AND MARKETING
Percentage of the production of selected fish products in selected District DARD / Trade Dept.
market chains that meet national / export standards at province and DARD Sub-deaprtment
commune levels quality control -
(For example: 50% of black tiger shrimp production meet export
standards)
National / provincial / local per capita consumption of fish Provicncial / District statitics
books / DARD
41
Provicncial / District statitics

Fishery contribution in GDP at provincial and national levels books
Percentage of production / amount of selected fish / fisheries products CPC, District DARD / Trade
that is consumed locally, in provincial market, in national market and dept?
in international market)
Amount and percentage of government / non-government budget CPC, District DARD / Trade
available for support to post-harvest fisheries at province / district / dept?
commune levels
Number and percentage of government officers working on post- CPC, District DARD / Trade
harvest fisheries at province / district / commune / community level dept?
Qualification of Government officers working on post-harvest CPC, District DARD / Trade

fisheries at province / district / commune / community level dept?
Number / Percentage of officers working on post - havest fisheries CPC, District DARD / Trade
who have been formally / informally trained in post havest skills and dept?
techniques in province (from province to commune level)
OUTPUT 4: LIVELIHOODS ENHANCEMENT AND
DIVERSIFICATION
Average income according to the livelihood activity by HH in 2009 at Provincial socio-economic
province and commune level reports, CPC
OUTPUT 5: MICRO FINANCE
Proportion (%) of fisher folks among local clientele base of certain Bank credit intermediary
formal financial institutions at province and commune level agencies (Mass organizations)
Bank credit staff
Proportion (%) of fishers with the saving and loan use formal Bank credit intermediary
finanacial Institutions at province and commune levels agencies
Bank credit staff
CHECKLIST FOR GROUP DISCUSSION WITH FISHERS
42
Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser
OUTPUT 1: FISHERIES CO-MANAGEMENT

The current understanding and expectations of the Degree of understading of Could be single answer
concept “co-management” among each key the term FCM by local questions or oral
stakeholder group (fishers, government fishers / Government expression
department, policy makers). Dept / Policy Makers
The sorts of existing policies and institutions that Existence and nature of yes / no and description
support or inhibit co-management and areas for institutions providing
strengthening them (including policies on Gender support on FCM
Mainstreaming)
The attitudes and perceptions of fishers to formal Existence and nature of Yes / no and
and traditional management systems and conflict formal / informal description
resolution systems. management system in - management level
fishery resources (district, commune,
management and use local)
- Stakeholders of the
systems
- How long was it set
up (years)
- Degree of their
implementation (1 - 5)
- Degree of their impact
on fishery resources
management
Degree of usefulness / Very useful / useful /
effectiveness of formal / not useful / no idea
informal management
system by fishers
Degree of conflict Yes/ no and
between formal and Description
informal systems
Stakeholder practices in current management Existence and nature of Yes / no and
systems and recommendations for improvements. fishery management Description
plans / activities
prepapred by
stakeholders
Recommendations for Description
improvements of
practices in management
systems
43
Current systems for conflict resolution – including Existence and nature of Yes / no and
details of how systems are currently used conflict management description
systems at different level - Formal / informal
- Legal status (if
violator will be
punished by local
authorities / law under
the system)
- Operators /
administrator
(province/ district/
commune/local)
- Stakeholders
- When was it
established
- System mechnism and
organization
Degree of effectiveness Very effective,
of these systems on effective, not effective,
conflict management by no idea
fishers and institutions
The current numbers and types of stakeholder Method of stakeholder Type of methods
involvement in fisheries management involvement in FM used (consultation meetings,
by authorities etc.)
The perceptions of fishers and resource managers Perception on Decrease, increase,
relating to the state of the fisheries resources and productivity of fisheries stable, no idea
allocation of benefits from fisheries. resources by fishers and
government during the
last and next five years
Perception on CPUE Decrease, increase,
(catch per unit effort) by stable, no idea (Effort =
fishers and government amount of time)
during the last and next
five years
Perception on diversity of Decrease, increase,
fisheries resources during stable, no idea
the last and next five
years by fishers and
government
Perception on lagoon and Decrease, increase
sea water polution by stable, no idea
fishers / government
during the last and next
five years
Perception on current Decrease, increase
fishing capacity by stable, no idea (e.g.
fishers /government Number of fishing
during the last and next gears)
five years
44
Degree of equity in 1-5 evaluation (very

access of fisheries high, high, average,
resources among low, not at all)
resources user groups by
fishers / resources
managers
Degree of equity in 1-5 evaluation (very
allocation of fisheries high, high, average,
benefits among resources low, not at all)
user groups by fishers /
resources managers
The safety at sea information and disaster Existence and nature of Yes / no and
preparedness information that is currently safety at sea (SAS) and description
produced. disaster preparedness
information (regulations,
guidelines, mateials, etc.)
available to small scale
fishers
The information on safety at sea that stakeholders Existence of different List
(govt to community) use and how they access this. channel for SAS
information access
The levels of awareness of fishers, their household Existence and nature of Yes / no and
members and government staff regarding safety at SAS measures (by description
sea measures in fishing communities. government regulations /
local regualtion /
customary regulations /
experiences)
Degree of awareness on vey aware / aware / not
certain SAS measures by aware
staff
Current legal frameworks / guidance for safety at Existence and nature of Yes / no and
sea measures. guidelines / frameworks description
for SAS measures
The systems for recording accidents and details of Exisistence and nature of Responsible
the numbers (where recorded and who is involved guidelines / frameworks cooperative, procedures
in reporting and recording). for accident recording and systems
and reporting at province
/ district / commune /
community level
The systems set up to coordinate responses to Exisistence and nature of Yes / no and
safety issues and disasters. disaster/emergency description
response systems for at
province / district /
commune / community
level
45
Degree of effectiveness very effective,

of these systems in effective, not effective
disaster preparedness and
promoting safety issues
by fisher /
community/local
authority
Perceptions of fishers and community members Trend (in number) of Increase, decrease,
about numbers, causes and severity of accidents at accidents at sea during stable, no idea
sea in targeted communities. last three years perceived
by fishers
The most common causes Ranking
of accidents at sea during
the last three years
Degree of severity of Sereve (human death);
accidents (interms of lost Average (physical
materials and human) at damage), minor (minor
sea during the last three or no damange)
years by fishers and
community
The current disaster preparedness systems in use Existence of plans / Yes / no and
and the facilities in place to utilize. activities on disaster description
preparedness at commune
/ community level
Degree of impementation fully implemented /
of these plans / activties mostly / partly / not
by fisher / community / implemented
commune staff
Existence and nature of Yes / no and
existing facilities for description
disaster preparedness at
commune / community
levels
Degree of utilization / 1-5 evaluation
access of certain facilities
evaluated by commune
authorities / fishers /
community
Degree of usefulness / 1-5 evaluation
quality of certain
facilities evaluated by
commune authorites /
fishers / community
The distribution and use of fish and fisheries Types of immediate Percentage of selected
products from the project site in local and national buyers of fish and fishery fish / fisheries product
markets. products from the fishers production that are sold
/ processors to midlemen,
processing plants, local
46
market, other
Percentage of fish used Unused, HH immediate

for different purposes consumption, feed for
fish / animal;
processing for HH
consumption,
processing for selling,
local consumption,
export
Degree of perceived influence on the market by Degree of influence on 1-5 evaluation
fishers and fish processers. the market price of
selected fish products by
fishers / processors
Degree of 1-5 evaluation
fisher/processor's
dependance on
midleperson
Existing policies related to post-harvest fisheries Existence and nature of Yes/ no and description
and institutions that influence post-harvest policies on fisheries post-
fisheries. havest handling
Degree of 1-5 evaluation
implementation of
fisheries post-havest
policies / guidelines by
commune authorities and
fishers
fisheries post-havest description
district / commune level
OUTPUT 4: LIVELIHOODS ENHANCEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION (LE&D)

Livelihood activities (including women and Type and importance of Ranking / 1-5
children; and the very poor and marginalised) fishery related livelihood evaluation
(under input 1 in TOR and same as item (i) of activties elated livelihood
output 4) activties by different
groups (men, women,
children, poor, better off,
marginized...)
Gender roles and responsibilities within the target Degree of involvenment 1-5 evaluation
communities (under input 1 in TOR); in livelihood and
housechold activties and
amount of working hours
of men and women in
family
Degree of men and Primary role,
women roles in making secondary role, no role
decisions in livelihood
47
and housechore activties
Degree of involvement 1-5 evaluation

of men and women in
implementation in
decided activities
Perceptions of prosperity of fishers and household Fishers and communities Description
members in pilot communities. definitions about
prosperity
Fishers and community Description
perception on standards
of poor HHs / rich HHs.
Factors that seem to help or inhibit livelihood Existence and nature of Yes / no and
change in target communities. existing factors that seem description
to help livelihood change
in target communes
existing factors that seem description
to inbibit livelihood
change in target
communes
The availability of supporting services for Existence and nature of Yes / no and
livelihood enhancement and diversification supporting servcies for description
available in pilot communities. small-scale fishers'
livelihood enhancement
and diversification at
commune / local levels
Current formal financial institutions operating in Existence and nature of Yes / no and
the project areas, their perception of the fisheries formal financial description
activities and the proportion of fisher folks among institutions available to
their local clientele base. local fishers
Degree of perceived risk 1-5 evaluation
of borrowing money from
formal services by fishers
Existing informal mechanisms used to access Existence and nature of Description
credit (Rotating Savings and Credit Associations informal mechanisms
{ROSCAs}, moneylenders, relatives, middlemen, used to access credit at
etc.), their respective perceptions and levels of commune / community
satisfaction by the fisheries communities. levels
Degree of perceived risk 1-5 evaluation
of borrowing money from
informal services by
fishers
Recent or current access of the community Existence and nature of Yes / no and
members to (government) subsidized credit lines. subsidized credit lines in Description
province / distirct /
commune / community
48
Potential for savings mobilization (“saving Degree of fisher Very important /

culture”, savings gap, use of informal ways, etc.) perception of importance important / not
of making savings important
Degree of fisher Very willing / willing
willingness of making not willing
savings
Fisher saving capacity Maximum amount per
month that fisher can
save
49
CHECKLIST FOR SUB-DEPARTMENT OF FISHERY RESOURCE EXPLOITATION AND

PROTECTION (SDECAFIREP)

The current understanding and Degree of awareness of the term FCM very aware / aware
expectations of the concept “co- by local fishers / Government Dept / / not aware
management” among each key Policy Makers
stakeholder group (fishers, government Degree of understading of the term Could be single
department, policy makers). FCM by local fishers / Government answer questions or
Dept / Policy Makers oral expression
Degree of overall usefullness of FCM in No idea / very
fisheries resources management by useful / useful / not
local fishers / Government staff / Policy useful
makers
fisheries livelihoods improvement by useful / useful / not
local fishers / Government Dept / Policy useful
Makers
The sorts of existing policies and Existence and nature of polices on FCM Yes / no and
institutions that support or inhibit co- Implementation at province / district / description
management and areas for strengthening commune / local levels
them (including policies on Gender Existence and nature of institutions yes / no and
Mainstreaming) providing support on FCM description
Perceived inhibition and restriction on Yes / no and
FCM implementation by policies and description
institutions at province / district /
Recommendations for strengthening the Description
policies and institutions related to FCM
The attitudes and perceptions of fishers to Existence and nature of formal / Yes / no and
formal and traditional management informal management system in fishery description
systems and conflict resolution systems. resources management and use
- management level (district, commune,

local)
- Stakeholders of the systems
- How long was it set up (years)
- Degree of their implementation (1 - 5)
- Degree of their impact on fishery
resources management
Stakeholder practices in current Existence and nature of fishery Yes / no and
management systems and management plans / activities prepapred Description
recommendations for improvements. by stakeholders
50
Degree of fishers' and instituions' - Active

participation in planning / participation
implementation / monitoring of FM (sharing and
plans / activties consutlating)
- Passive
participation
(participated
because being
invited)
- No participation
Recommendations for improvements of Description
practices in management systems
Current systems for conflict resolution – Existence and nature of conflict Yes / no and
including details of how systems are management systems at different level description- Formal
currently used / informal - Legal
status (if violator
will be punished by
local authorities /
law under the
system)- Operators /
administrator
commune/local)-
Stakeholders- When
was it established-
System mechnism
and organization
Degree of effectiveness of these Very effective,
systems on conflict management by effective, not
fishers and institutions effective, no idea
The current numbers and types of Existence and nature of Province Yes / no and
stakeholder involvement in fisheries Fishery Association description
management Method of stakeholder involvement in Type of methods
FM used by authorities (consultation
meetings, etc.)
The perceptions of fishers and resource Perception on productivity of fisheries Decrease, increase,
managers relating to the state of the resources by fishers and government stable, no idea
fisheries resources and allocation of during the last and next five years
benefits from fisheries.
Perception on CPUE (catch per unit Decrease, increase,
effort) by fishers and government stable, no idea
during the last and next five years (Effort = amount of
time)
Perception on diversity of fisheries Decrease, increase,
resources during the last and next five stable, no idea
years by fishers and government
Perception on lagoon and sea water Decrease, increase
polution by fishers / government during stable, no idea
the last and next five years
51
Perception on current fishing capacity Decrease, increase

by fishers /government during the last stable, no idea (e.g.
and next five years Number of fishing
gears)
Degree of equity in access of fisheries 1-5 evaluation (very
resources among resources user groups high, high, average,
by fishers / resources managers low, not at all)
Degree of equity in allocation of 1-5 evaluation (very
fisheries benefits among resources user high, high, average,
groups by fishers / resources managers low, not at all)
The safety at sea information and disaster Existence and nature of safety at sea Yes / no and
preparedness information that is currently (SAS) and disaster preparedness description
produced. information (regulations, guidelines,
mateials, etc.) available to small scale
fishers
The levels of awareness of fishers, their Existence and nature of SAS measures Yes / no and
household members and government staff (by government regulations / local description
regarding safety at sea measures in fishing regualtion / customary regulations /
communities. experiences)
Current legal frameworks / guidance for Existence and nature of guidelines / Yes / no and
safety at sea measures. frameworks for SAS measures description
Current levels of awareness / compliance Degree of boat safety Percentage of boats

with safety regulations. equipped with basic
safety items
compared to total
number of esixting
boats
Compliance with safety measures in boat Existence and nature of measures in Yes / no and
construction and in the yards where they boat construction and in the yards by description
are constructed (including the availability law / local authorities
of data on numbers and types of boat Degree of boat buider compliance with % complied and
where recorded and available). safety measures Description
Degree of fishing boat registration at Percentage of
province / district / commune level registered boats in
fishing fleet
Degree of inspection coverage % of boat inspected
during operation
(one year)(e.g for
safety equipment
and technical
inspectation.
The systems for recording accidents and Exisistence and nature of guidelines / Responsible
details of the numbers (where recorded frameworks for accident recording and cooperative,
and who is involved in reporting and reporting at province / district / procedures and
recording). commune / community level systems
Numbe and types of fishing accidents Accident number
reported and categories
52
The systems set up to coordinate Exisistence and nature of Yes / no and

responses to safety issues and disasters. disaster/emergency response systems description
for at province / district / commune /
community level
The current disaster preparedness systems Exisistence and nature of guidelines / Yes / no and
in use and the facilities in place to utilize. frameworks / circulars on disaster description
preparedness at province / district /
commune / community level
53
CHECKLIST FOR DISTRICT DARD
The current understanding and Degree of awareness of the term FCM very aware / aware
expectations of the concept “co- by local fishers / Government Dept / / not aware
stakeholder group (fishers, government Degree of understading of the term Could be single
department, policy makers). FCM by local fishers / Government answer questions or
Dept / Policy Makers oral expression
fisheries resources management by useful / useful / not
local fishers / Government staff / Policy useful
makers
fisheries livelihoods improvement by useful / useful / not
local fishers / Government Dept / Policy useful
Makers
institutions that support or inhibit co- Implementation at province / district / description
management and areas for strengthening commune / local levels
them (including policies on Gender Existence and nature of institutions yes / no and
Mainstreaming) providing support on FCM description
formal and traditional management informal management system in fishery description
systems and conflict resolution systems. resources management and use - management level
(district, commune,
local)
- Stakeholders of
the systems
- How long was it
set up (years)
- Degree of their
implementation (1 -
5)
- Degree of their
impact on fishery
resources
management
54

recommendations for improvements. by stakeholders
Degree of fishers' and instituions' - Active
participation in planning / participation
implementation / monitoring of FM (sharing and
plans / activties consutlating)
- Passive
participation
(participated
because being
invited)
- No participation
including details of how systems are management systems at different level description
currently used - Formal / informal
- Legal status (if
violator will be
punished by local
authorities / law
under the system)
- Operators /
administrator
commune/local)
- Stakeholders
- When was it
established
- System mechnism
and organization
The current numbers and types of Method of stakeholder involvement in Type of methods
stakeholder involvement in fisheries FM used by authorities (consultation
management meetings, etc.)
The perceptions of fishers and resource Perception on productivity of fisheries Decrease, increase,
managers relating to the state of the resources by fishers and government stable, no idea
fisheries resources and allocation of during the last and next five years
benefits from fisheries.
Perception on CPUE (catch per unit Decrease, increase,
effort) by fishers and government stable, no idea
during the last and next five years (Effort = amount of
time)
55

gears)
Degree of equity in access of fisheries 1-5 evaluation
resources among resources user groups (very high, high,
by fishers / resources managers average, low, not at
all)
Degree of equity in allocation of 1-5 evaluation
fisheries benefits among resources user (very high, high,
groups by fishers / resources managers average, low, not at
all)
The safety at sea information and disaster Existence and nature of safety at sea Yes / no and
preparedness information that is currently (SAS) and disaster preparedness description
produced. information (regulations, guidelines,
fishers
The information on safety at sea that Degree of awareness on availability of Very aware / aware
stakeholders (govt to community) use and SAS information by government / not aware
how they access this. agencies / local authories / community
organization / fishers
Degree of accessibility to information very high, high,
on SAS by government agencies / local average, low, not at
authories / community organization / all with reasons
fishers
Existence of different channel for SAS List
information access
Degree of fisher and fovernment Very sactisfied /
satisfaction with certain types of these sactisfied / not
channels sactisfied
Degree of usefullness of certain type of Vey useful, useful,
information on SAS by government not useful, no idea
agencies / local authories / community
The levels of awareness of fishers, their Existence and nature of SAS measures Yes / no and
household members and government staff (by government regulations / local description
regarding safety at sea measures in fishing regualtion / customary regulations /
communities. experiences)
Degree of awareness on certain SAS vey aware / aware /
measures by fishers and government not aware
staff
Current legal frameworks / guidance for Existence and nature of guidelines / Yes / no and
safety at sea measures. frameworks for SAS measures description
56

responses to safety issues and disasters. disaster/emergency response systems description
for at province / district / commune /
community level
The current disaster preparedness systems Exisistence and nature of guidelines / Yes / no and
in use and the facilities in place to utilize. frameworks / circulars on disaster description
preparedness at province / district /
OUTPUT 4: LIVELIHOODS ENHANCEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION
Factors that seem to help or inhibit Existence and nature of existing factors Yes / no and
livelihood change in target communities. that seem to help livelihood change in description
target communes
Existence and nature of existing factors Yes / no and
that seem to inbibit livelihood change in description
target communes
The availability of supporting services for Existence and nature of supporting Yes / no and
livelihood enhancement and servcies for small-scale fishers' description
diversification available in pilot livelihood enhancement and
communities. diversification at province / district /
57
CHECKLIST FOR PROVINCIAL FISHERY ASSOCIATION

The current understanding and Degree of awareness of the Very aware / aware / not aware
expectations of the concept “co- term FCM by local fishers /
management” among each key Government Dept / Policy
stakeholder group (fishers, government Makers
department, policy makers). Degree of understading of Could be single answer
the term FCM by local questions or oral expression
fishers / Government Dept /
Policy Makers
Degree of overall usefullness No idea / very useful / useful /
of FCM in fisheries not useful
resources management by
local fishers / Government
staff / Policy makers
livelihoods improvement by
Dept / Policy Makers
The sorts of existing policies and Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
institutions that support or inhibit co- polices on FCM
management and areas for strengthening Implementation at province
them (including policies on Gender / district / commune / local
Mainstreaming) levels
Existence and nature of yes / no and description
institutions providing
support on FCM
Perceived inhibition and Yes / no and description
restriction on FCM
implementation by policies
and institutions at province /
levels
strengthening the policies
and institutions related to
FCM
58
The attitudes and perceptions of fishers to Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
formal and traditional management formal / informal - management level (district,
systems and conflict resolution systems. management system in commune, local)
fishery resources - Stakeholders of the systems
management and use - How long was it set up
(years)
- Degree of their
- Degree of their impact on
fishery resources management
Stakeholder practices in current Existence and nature of Yes / no and Description
management systems and fishery management plans /
recommendations for improvements. activities prepapred by
stakeholders
Degree of fishers' and - Active participation (sharing
instituions' participation in and consutlating)
planning / implementation / - Passive participation
monitoring of FM plans / (participated because being
activties invited)
- No participation

improvements of practices in
management systems
Current systems for conflict resolution – Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
including details of how systems are conflict management - Formal / informal
currently used systems at different level - Legal status (if violator will
be punished by local authorities
/ law under the system)
- Operators / administrator
commune/local)
- Stakeholders
- When was it established
organization
Degree of effectiveness of Very effective, effective, not

these systems on conflict effective, no idea
management by fishers and
institutions
The current numbers and types of Number of FAs and FA Number
management Number of fishing rights Number
allocated in the province
Method of stakeholder Type of methods (consultation
involvement in FM used by meetings, etc.)
authorities
59
The perceptions of fishers and resource Perception on productivity of Decrease, increase, stable, no
managers relating to the state of the fisheries resources by fishers idea
fisheries resources and allocation of and government during the
benefits from fisheries. last and next five years
Perception on CPUE (catch Decrease, increase, stable, no
per unit effort) by fishers idea (Effort = amount of time)
and government during the
last and next five years
Perception on diversity of Decrease, increase, stable, no
fisheries resources during the idea
last and next five years by
Perception on lagoon and sea Decrease, increase stable, no
water polution by fishers / idea
government during the last
and next five years
Perception on current fishing Decrease, increase stable, no
capacity by fishers idea (e.g. Number of fishing
/government during the last gears)
and next five years
Degree of equity in access of 1-5 evaluation (very high, high,
fisheries resources among average, low, not at all)
fishers / resources managers
Degree of equity in 1-5 evaluation (very high, high,
allocation of fisheries average, low, not at all)
benefits among resources
user groups by fishers /
resources managers
60
CHECKLIST FOR COMMUNE FISHERY ASSOCIATION

The current understanding and Degree of awareness of the very aware / aware / not aware
expectations of the concept “co- term FCM by local fishers /
management” among each key Government Dept / Policy
stakeholder group (fishers, government Makers
department, policy makers). Degree of understading of the Could be single answer
term FCM by local fishers / questions or oral expression
Government Dept / Policy
Makers
of FCM in fisheries resources not useful
management by local fishers /
Government staff / Policy
makers
livelihoods improvement by
Dept / Policy Makers
The sorts of existing policies and Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
institutions that support or inhibit co- polices on FCM
management and areas for strengthening Implementation at province /
them (including policies on Gender district / commune / local
Mainstreaming) levels
Existence and nature of yes / no and description
institutions providing support
on FCM
Perceived inhibition and Yes / no and description
restriction on FCM
implementation by policies
and institutions at province /
levels
strengthening the policies and
institutions related to FCM
61
The attitudes and perceptions of fishers to Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
formal and traditional management formal / informal - management level (district,
systems and conflict resolution systems. management system in commune, local)
fishery resources - Stakeholders of the systems
management and use - How long was it set up
(years)
- Degree of their
- Degree of their impact on
fishery resources management
Degree of conflict between Yes/ no and Description
formal and informal systems
Stakeholder practices in current Existence and nature of Yes / no and Description
management systems and fishery management plans /
recommendations for improvements. activities prepapred by
stakeholders
Degree of fishers' and - Active participation (sharing
instituions' participation in and consutlating)
planning / implementation / - Passive participation
monitoring of FM plans / (participated because being
activties invited)
- No participation

management systems
Current systems for conflict resolution – Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
including details of how systems are conflict management systems - Formal / informal
currently used at different level - Legal status (if violator will
commune/local)
- Stakeholders
organization
Degree of effectiveness of Very effective, effective, not

these systems on conflict effective, no idea
management by fishers and
institutions
The current numbers and types of Number of FAs and FA Number
management Method of stakeholder Type of methods (consultation
involvement in FM used by meetings, etc.)
authorities
62
The perceptions of fishers and resource Perception on productivity of Decrease, increase, stable, no
managers relating to the state of the fisheries resources by fishers idea
fisheries resources and allocation of and government during the
benefits from fisheries. last and next five years
Perception on CPUE (catch Decrease, increase, stable, no
per unit effort) by fishers and idea (Effort = amount of time)
and next five years
Perception on diversity of Decrease, increase, stable, no
fisheries resources during the idea
last and next five years by
Perception on lagoon and sea Decrease, increase stable, no
water polution by fishers / idea
and next five years
Perception on current fishing Decrease, increase stable, no
capacity by fishers idea (e.g. Number of fishing
/government during the last gears)
and next five years
Degree of equity in access of 1-5 evaluation (very high, high,
fisheries resources among average, low, not at all)
Degree of equity in allocation 1-5 evaluation (very high, high,
of fisheries benefits among average, low, not at all)

Existing policies related to post-harvest Existence and nature of Yes/ no and description
fisheries and institutions that influence policies on fisheries post-
post-harvest fisheries. havest handling
Degree of implementation of 1-5 evaluation
fisheries post-havest policies /
guidelines by province /
district / commune authorities
and fishers
Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
Factors that seem to help or inhibit Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
livelihood change in target communities. existing factors that seem to
help livelihood change in
target communes
existing factors that seem to
63
inbibit livelihood change in

target communes
The availability of supporting services for Existence and nature of Yes / no and description
livelihood enhancement and supporting servcies for small-
diversification available in pilot scale fishers' livelihood
communities. enhancement and
diversification at province /
levels
64
CHECKLIST FOR COMMUNE PEOPLE COMMITTEE

The current understanding and Degree of awareness of the term FCM very aware / aware /
expectations of the concept “co- by local fishers / Government Dept / not aware
stakeholder group (fishers, Degree of understading of the term Could be single
government department, policy FCM by local fishers / Government answer questions or
makers). Dept / Policy Makers oral expression
Degree of overall usefullness of FCM in No idea / very useful
fisheries resources management by / useful / not useful
local fishers / Government staff / Policy
makers
Degree of overall usefullness of FCM in No idea / very useful
fisheries livelihoods improvement by / useful / not useful
local fishers / Government Dept / Policy
Makers
institutions that support or inhibit Implementation at province / district / description
co-management and areas for commune / local levels
strengthening them (including Existence and nature of institutions yes / no and
policies on Gender Mainstreaming) providing support on FCM description
The attitudes and perceptions of Existence and nature of formal / Yes / no and
fishers to formal and traditional informal management system in fishery description
management systems and conflict resources management and use - management level
resolution systems. (district, commune,
local)
systems
up (years)
- Degree of their
implementation (1 -
5)
- Degree of their
impact on fishery
resources
management
65
recommendations for by stakeholders

improvements.
Degree of fishers' and instituions' - Active participation
participation in planning / (sharing and
implementation / monitoring of FM consutlating)
plans / activties - Passive
participation
(participated because
being invited)
- No participation
Current systems for conflict Existence and nature of conflict Yes / no and
resolution – including details of management systems at different level description
how systems are currently used - Formal / informal
- Legal status (if violator will be
punished by local authorities / law
under the system)
- Operators / administrator -
Stakeholders
- System mechnism and organization

The current numbers and types of Method of stakeholder involvement in Type of methods
stakeholder involvement in fisheries FM used by authorities (consultation
management meetings, etc.)
The perceptions of fishers and Perception on productivity of fisheries Decrease, increase,
resource managers relating to the resources by fishers and government stable, no idea
state of the fisheries resources and during the last and next five years
allocation of benefits from fisheries. Perception on CPUE (catch per unit Decrease, increase,
effort) by fishers and government stable, no idea (Effort
during the last and next five years = amount of time)
gears)
Degree of equity in access of fisheries 1-5 evaluation (very
resources among resources user groups high, high, average,
by fishers / resources managers low, not at all)
Degree of equity in allocation of 1-5 evaluation (very
fisheries benefits among resources user high, high, average,
66
groups by fishers / resources managers low, not at all)

The safety at sea information and Existence and nature of safety at sea Yes / no and
disaster preparedness information (SAS) and disaster preparedness description
that is currently produced. information (regulations, guidelines,
fishers
The information on safety at sea Degree of awareness on availability of Very aware / aware /
that stakeholders (govt to SAS information by government not aware
community) use and how they agencies / local authories / community
access this. organization / fishers
Degree of accessibility to information very high, high,
on SAS by government agencies / local average, low, not at
authories / community organization / all with reasons
fishers
Existence of different channel for SAS List
information access
Degree of fisher and fovernment Very sactisfied /
satisfaction with certain types of these sactisfied / not
channels sactisfied
Degree of usefullness of certain type of Vey useful, useful,
information on SAS by government not useful, no idea
agencies / local authories / community
The levels of awareness of fishers, Existence and nature of SAS measures Yes / no and
their household members and (by government regulations / local description
government staff regarding safety at regualtion / customary regulations /
sea measures in fishing experiences)
communities. Degree of awareness on certain SAS vey aware / aware /
measures by fishers and government not aware
staff
Current legal frameworks / Existence and nature of guidelines / Yes / no and
guidance for safety at sea measures. frameworks for SAS measures description
The systems for recording accidents Exisistence and nature of guidelines / Responsible
and details of the numbers (where frameworks for accident recording and cooperative,
recorded and who is involved in reporting at province / district / procedures and
reporting and recording). commune / community level systems
Numbe and types of fishing accidents Accident number and
reported categories
responses to safety issues and disaster/emergency response systems description
disasters. for at province / district / commune /
community level
Degree of effectiveness of these very effective,
systems in disaster preparedness and effective, not
promoting safety issues by fisher / effective
community/local authority
67
The current disaster preparedness Exisistence and nature of guidelines / Yes / no and
systems in use and the facilities in frameworks / circulars on disaster description
place to utilize. preparedness at province / district /
Existence of plans / activities on Yes / no and
disaster preparedness at commune / description
community level
Degree of impementation of these plans fully implemented /
/ activties by fisher / community / mostly / partly / not
commune staff implemented
Existence and nature of existing Yes / no and
facilities for disaster preparedness at description
commune / community levels
Degree of utilization / access of certain 1-5 evaluation
facilities evaluated by commune
authorities / fishers / community
Degree of usefulness / quality of certain 1-5 evaluation
facilities evaluated by commune
authorites / fishers / community
Existing policies related to post- Existence and nature of policies on Yes/ no and
harvest fisheries and institutions fisheries post-havest handling description
that influence post-harvest fisheries. Degree of implementation of fisheries 1-5 evaluation
post-havest policies / guidelines by
province / district / commune
authorities and fishers
Existence and nature of fisheries post- Yes / no and
havest institutions at province / district / description
commune level
Current levels of funding and staff Amount and percentage of government Number and %
deployed for post-harvest in project / non-government budget available to
communities. support post-harvest fisheries at
province / district / commune levels
Number and percentage of government Number and %
officers working on post-harvest
fisheries at province / district /
The knowledge and skills of the Number / Percentage of officers Numbe and %
government staff with respect to working on post - havest fisheries who
post harvest fisheries. have been formally / informally trained
in post havest skills and techniques
Degree of confidence of officers Very confident /
working on post - havest fisheries in confident / not
performing post-havest techniques / confident
giving instructions on post - havest
practices
68
Factors that seem to help or inhibit Existence and nature of existing factors Yes / no and
livelihood change in target that seem to help livelihood change in description
communities. target communes
Existence and nature of existing factors Yes / no and
that seem to inbibit livelihood change in description
target communes
The availability of supporting Existence and nature of supporting Yes / no and
services for livelihood enhancement servcies for small-scale fishers' description
and diversification available in pilot livelihood enhancement and
communities. diversification at province / district /
69
CHECKLIST FOR SUB-DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGRI PRODUCT

QUALITY CONTROL

Quality of selected fish products in selected Percentage of selected fish (Percentage of the
market chains against national (or products meeting national / production of selected
international if needed) standards. international safety fish products in selected
standards market chains that meet
national / export
standards)
(For example: 50% of
black tiger shrimp
production meet export
standards)
Current per capita consumption of fish locally National / provincial / local Per capita consumption
and nationally (where figures or proxy figures per capita consumption of of fish
exist). fish
The distribution and use of fish and fisheries Distribution of local fish Percentage of production
products from the project site in local and and fisheries products in / amount of selected fish
national markets. local, national, and / fisheries products that
international markets is consumed locally, in
provincial market, in
national market and in
international market)
fisheries and institutions that influence post- policies on fisheries post-
harvest fisheries. havest handling
Degree of implementation 1-5 evaluation
of fisheries post-havest
fishers
Current levels of funding and staff deployed Amount and percentage of Number and %
for post-harvest in project communities. government / non-
government budget
available to support post-
harvest fisheries at province
/ district / commune levels
70
Number and percentage of Number and %

government officers
working on post-harvest
fisheries at province /
district / commune /
community level
The knowledge and skills of the government Number / Percentage of Numbe and %
staff with respect to post harvest fisheries. officers working on post -
havest fisheries who have
been formally / informally
trained in post havest skills
and techniques
Degree of confidence of Very confident /
officers working on post - confident / not confident
havest fisheries in
performing post-havest
techniques / giving
instructions on post - havest
practices
71
CHECKLIST FOR DISTRICT TRADE DEPARTMENT
Quality of selected fish products in selected Percentage of selected fish (Percentage of the
market chains against national (or products meeting national / production of selected
international if needed) standards. international safety fish products in selected
standards market chains that meet
national / export
standards)
(For example: 50% of
black tiger shrimp
production meet export
standards)
Current per capita consumption of fish locally National / provincial / local Per capita consumption
and nationally (where figures or proxy figures per capita consumption of of fish
exist). fish
fisheries and institutions that influence post- policies on fisheries post-
harvest fisheries. havest handling
Degree of implementation of 1-5 evaluation
fishers
Current levels of funding and staff deployed Amount and percentage of Number and %
for post-harvest in project communities. government / non-
government budget
available to support post-
harvest fisheries at province
/ district / commune levels
Number and percentage of Number and %
government officers working
on post-harvest fisheries at
The knowledge and skills of the government Number / Percentage of Numbe and %
staff with respect to post harvest fisheries. officers working on post -
havest fisheries who have
been formally / informally
trained in post havest skills
and techniques
72
Degree of confidence of Very confident /

officers working on post - confident / not confident
havest fisheries in
performing post-havest
techniques / giving
instructions on post - havest
practices
73
CHECKLIST FOR MASS ORGANIZATIONS

Factors that seem to help or inhibit livelihood Existence and nature of Yes / no and
change in target communities. existing factors that seem to description
help livelihood change in
target communes
existing factors that seem to description
inbibit livelihood change in
target communes
livelihood enhancement and diversification supporting servcies for small- description
available in pilot communities. scale fishers' livelihood
enhancement and
levels

Current formal financial institutions operating Existence and nature of Yes / no and
in the project areas, their perception of the formal financial institutions description
fisheries activities and the proportion of fisher available to local fishers
folks among their local clientele base. Level of priority of fisheries Priority order of fishery
activities compared to other activties as compared to
activties by formal financial other activities
institutions
Proportion of fishers among %
local clientele base of certain
formal financial institutions
Degree of evaluation of 1-5 evaluation
perceived risk of different
fisheries activities by formal
financial institutions
Degree of repayment of %
fisheries activities by formal
financial institutions
Current levels of borrowing and savings of the Maximum, minimum, and Maximum and
community members with formal financial average size of savings and minimum size of loan
institutions (e.g. commercial banks, rural loan provided by different
banks, licensed microfinance institutions, etc.) formal financial institutions
to local fishers
74
Proportion of fishers with the %

saving and loan with formal
finanacial Institutions
General level of donations from which have Level of financial dependence Fully dependant / most
beneficiated the existing microfinance of different microfinance dependant / partly
institutions. Resulting level of sustainability institutions on donors dependant /
(e.g. measure of their Operational Self independent
Sufficiency) Level of technical Fully dependant / most
dependence of different dependant / partly
microfinance institutions on dependant /
the donors independent
Level of human resource Fully dependant / most
dependence of different dependant / partly
microfinance institutions on dependant /
the donors independent
Degree of sustainability of Sustainable: financially
different microfinance / human / technically
institutions (1-5) sustainable
Mostly sustainable: 2
out of 3 factos are
sustainable
Partly sustainable: 1 out
of 3
Not sustainable: none
75
CHECKLIST FOR DISTRICT EXTENSTION STATION

The current understanding and expectations of Degree of awareness of the very aware / aware /
the concept “co-management” among each key term FCM by local fishers / not aware
stakeholder group (fishers, government Government Dept / Policy
department, policy makers). Makers
Degree of understading of the Could be single answer
term FCM by local fishers / questions or oral
Government Dept / Policy expression
Makers
Degree of overall usefullness of No idea / very useful /
FCM in fisheries resources useful / not useful
management by local fishers /
Government staff / Policy
makers
Degree of overall usefullness of No idea / very useful /
FCM in fisheries livelihoods useful / not useful
improvement by local fishers /
Government Dept / Policy
Makers
formal and traditional management systems and informal management system in description
conflict resolution systems. fishery resources management - management level
and use (district, commune,
local)
systems
up (years)
- Degree of their
- Degree of their impact
on fishery resources
management
management systems
76
including details of how systems are currently management systems at description
used different level
Formal / informal
- Legal status (if violator will
commune/local)
- Stakeholders
organization
systems on conflict effective, not effective,
management by fishers and no idea
institutions
The perceptions of fishers and resource Degree of equity in access of 1-5 evaluation (very
managers relating to the state of the fisheries fisheries resources among high, high, average,
resources and allocation of benefits from resources user groups by fishers low, not at all)
fisheries. / resources managers
Degree of equity in allocation 1-5 evaluation (very
of fisheries benefits among high, high, average,
resources user groups by fishers low, not at all)
/ resources managers
Factors that seem to help or inhibit livelihood Existence and nature of existing Yes / no and
change in target communities. factors that seem to help description
livelihood change in target
communes
Existence and nature of existing Yes / no and
factors that seem to inbibit description
livelihood change in target
communes
livelihood enhancement and diversification supporting servcies for small- description
available in pilot communities. scale fishers' livelihood
enhancement and
district / commune / local levels
77
CHECKLIST FOR FISH PROCESSING UNITS / HOUSEHOLDS
Nghề chính hay phụ? Đóng góp

bao nhiêu % thu nhập gia đình?
The role of fish processing to HH Vai trò của nghề chế biến Bao nhiêu người trong độ làm
economy đối với gia đình nghề này? Thuê thêm bao
nhiêu lao động? Doanh thu mỗi
năm bao nhiêu?
The current levels of post-harvest skills, Kỹ năng và kiến thức về Các sản phẩm chế biến là gì?
knowledge and practices. phương pháp và kỹ thuật Dùng phương pháp, kỹ thuật
chế biến gì?Có phương pháp nào biết
mà không sử dụng được
không? Tại sao?
Có thông thạo về kỹ thuật
phương pháp đó không? Tự
nhận xét về kỹ năng và kiến
thức chế biến (rất tôt / tốt / bình
thường / kém / rất kém)
Mức độ áp dụng các Kỹ thuật / phương pháp nào
phương pháp trong chế được sử dụng thươnggf xuyên,
biến thủy sản phương pháp nào ít được sử
dụng; Tại sao?
Tập huấn về chế biến Trong 3 năm qua, có tham gia
khóa tập huấn nào về bảo quản
chế biến không, nếu có nội
dung gì và bao lâu?
Post-harvest facilities available and being Phương tiện thiết bị chế Có nhưng phương tiện, thiết bị
used by fisher communities. biến nào dùng cho bảo quản, sơ chế
và chế biến
Hiện trạng hoạt động của Mới, cũ, hoạt động tốt, không
các thiết bị này hoạt động...
Mức độ sử dụng của các Tần suất sử dụng và hiệu quả
thiết bị của nó
Quality of selected fish products in Tỉ lệ sản lượng các sản Các sản phẩm chế biến thủy
selected market chains against national phẩm đạt tiêu chuẩn an sản chính của hộ?
(or international if needed) standards. toàn / chất lượng quốc gia Tỉ lệ sản lượng sản phẩm thủy
và quốc tế sản chính đủ tiêu chuẩn xuất
khẩu
Degree of perceived influence on the Mức độ ảnh hưởng đến thị Mức độ tiếp cận thị trường và
market by fishers and fish processers. trường của một số sản tính chủ động trong giao dịch
phẩm thủy sản chính mua bán đối với các sản phẩm
này;
NCơ sở chế biến có thể tác
động đến giá cả, thị trường
không? Mức độ tác động.
78
The distribution and use of fish and Phân phối các sản phẩm Tỉ lệ sản lượng sản phẩm chế
fisheries products from the project site in thủy sản biến thủy sản chính tiêu thụ ở
local and national markets. địa phương / thị trường trong
tỉnh / trong nước / quốc tế
Các đối tác thu mua sản Tỉ lệ sản lượng sản phẩm chế
phẩm thủy sản từ ngư dân biến thủy sản chính được bán
và người chế biến thông qua người trung gian
(con buôn); bán cho các cơ sở
chế biến tại địa phương, nhà
máy đông lạnh, tiêu thụ tại chợ
trong xã, khác)
Sản lượng thủy sản / sản Tỉ lệ sản lượng chế biến thủy
phẩm thủy sản sử dụng cho sản dúng cho các mục đích
các mục đích khác nhau khác nahu: không sử dụng
được; dùng cho hộ; dùng làm
thức ăn cho gia súc / cá; chế
biến để gia đình dùng; chế biến
để bán; tiêu thụ trong tỉnh; xuất
khẩu )
Existing policies related to post-harvest Các chính sách về bảo Liệt kê các chính sách; chính
fisheries and institutions that influence quản chế biến thủy sản sau sách nào đang được áp dụng ở
post-harvest fisheries. thu hoạch (đánh bắt) ở các cộng đồng; tại sao một số chính
cấp sách không được triển khai ở
cộng đồng?
Sự thực hiện các chính Đánh giá mức độ thực hiện các
sách / hướng dẫn về về chính sách theo các mức
bảo quản chế biến thủy sản "Thực hiện hoàn toàn / phần
sau thu hoạch lớn / một phần / không thực
hiện"; lý do tại sao?
Các cơ quan liên quan đến Liệt kê các cơ quan liên quan
bảo quản chế biến thủy sản đến bảo quản chế biến thủy
sau thu hoạch ở các cấp sản sau thu hoạch ở các cấp ;
cơ quan nào đang hoạt động ở
cộng đồng; vai trò của cơ quan
đó?
Attitudes towards changing or diversifying Có hài lòng với nghề hiện Rất hài lòng / hài lòng / không
livelihoods in pilot communities. tại (chế biến thủy sản) hài lòng? Tại sao?
không? Tại sao
Gia đinh còn làm nghề gì Số lượng nghề trong gia đình
khác
Có muốn thay đổi hoặc đa Rất mong muốn / mong muốn /
dạng nghề không? Tại sao? không mong muốn / không biết
Factors that seem to help or inhibit Các yếu tố kích thích / cản
livelihood change in target communities. trợ sự đa dạng hóa và thay
đổi sinh kế
The availability of supporting services for Các dịch vụ hỗ trợ thay đổi Mức độ hiểu biết về các dịch vụ
livelihood enhancement and diversification / cải thiện sinh kế này, đánh giá vai trò và hiệu
available in pilot communities. quả của các dịch vụ (rất hiệu
quả, hiệu quả, không hiêu quả);
Đánh giá sự hài lòng về giá cả
và chất lượng của dịch vụ (rất
hài lòng, hài long và không hài
79
lòng)
Fishers and their household member’s Các cơ quan / đơn vị hỗ trợ Mức độ hiểu biết về các cơ
perceptions and levels of satisfaction thay đổi / cải thiện sinh kế quan / đơn vị này, đánh giá vai
regarding the supporting services for trò và hiệu quả của các cơ
livelihood enhancement and diversification quan / đơn vị (rất hiệu quả, hiệu
available in the pilot communities quả, không hiêu quả);
Đánh giá sự hài lòng về sự hữu
ích của các cơ quan / đơn vị
(rất hữu ích, hữu ích và không
hữu ích)
Levels of awareness for accessing Nhận thức và hiểu biết về Biết có hay không?; Liệt kê
financial services in pilot communities. các kênh tín dụng cho vay một số chương trình;
để chế biến thủy sản Biết như thế nào (Rất rõ, rõ,
không biết)
Access of formal and informal credit Mức độ tiếp cận chương Có dễ để vay vốn nhà nước để
schemes trình tín dụng nhà nước / tư chế biến thủy sản không?;
nhân cho hoạt động chế Ngân hàng có ưu tiên cho vay
biến thủy sản để chế biến thủy sản không; So
với các hoạt động khác, vay để
chế biến thủy sản khó hơn hay
dễ hơn;
Vay để sản xuất chế biến thủy
sản có rủi ro không? Mức độ rủi
ro (rất cao, cao, bình thường,
thấp, không); Tại sao?;
Vay tư nhân và vay nahf nước,
vay nơi nào dễ hơn?
Thích vay từ nhà nước hơn hay
tư nhân hơn? Tại sao?
Current levels of borrowing and savings of Mức vay 5 năm qua có vay vốn không?
the community members with formal Vay ở đâu? Bao nhiều? Dùng
financial institutions (e.g. commercial để làm gì?
banks, rural banks, licensed microfinance
institutions, etc.)
Recent or current access of the Tiếp cận tín dụng ưu đãi Có biết chương trình tín dụng
community members to (government) ưu đãi nào cho chế biến thủy
subsidized credit lines. sản không? Có biết quy chế
cho vay không? Có thuộc đối
tượng vay không? Có vay
không? Bao nhiều? Khi nào?
80

Baseline Survey - Vitnam Fisheries Ap064e ADA p30

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Baseline Survey - Vitnam Fisheries Ap064e ADA p30

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

REGIONAL FISHERIES LIVELIHOODS PROGRAMME

FOR SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA (RFLP) – VIET NAM

Activity 4.1.1: Survey of income and gender situation in target communes

For the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme

Truong Van Tuyen, Ph.D.

Centre for Community Research and Development (CCRD)

Thua Thien Hue, April 2011

For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as:

The survey group consisted of:

and a group of enumerators.

I. Background of the baseline survey

(1) Co-management mechanisms for sustainable utilization of fishery resources;

II. Survey design and methodology

2.1 Overall baseline survey design and methodology

as leading questions (key questions to be asked) including list of secondary data to be

2.2 Survey sites

Table 1: A list of the RFLP target communes

 The commune must have at least 30 fishing households

2.3 Data Collection

Table 3: Number of questions of each section in the questionnaire

2.3.3 Group discussion

2.3.4 Key informant interview

The key informants from the following institutions were interviewed:

 Sub-Department of Capture Fisheries and Resources Protection at DARD

The checklists for key informant interviews are attached as Annex 4.

2.4 Data registration, processing, and analysis

2.5 Survey team and organization

Volume 1: Baseline Design and Methodologies

I. Profile of surveyed communes and households

OUTPUT 1: FISHERIES CO-MANAGEMENT (FCM)

Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser Data source Tools / techniques

Degree of fishers' and - Active Fishers HH survey

Degree of effectiveness of Very effective, Fishers HH survey and Group discussion

Perception on current fishing Decrease, Fishers HH survey and group discussion

OUTPUT 2: SAFETY AT SEA (SAS)

Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser Data source Tools / techniques

sea measures in fishing structured interview)

Degree of fishing boat registration at province / Percentage of registered Fishers HH survey

OUTPUT 3: POST HARVEST AND MARKETING (PH&M)

Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser Data source Tools / techniques

OUTPUT 4: LIVELIHOODS ENHANCEMENT AND DIVERSIFICATION (LE&D)

Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser Data source Tools / techniques

OUTPUT 5: MICRO FINANCE (MF)

Guiding questions Data to be collected Anwser Data source Tools / techniques

Level of savings at formal financial institutions Range of saving Fishers HH survey

Annex 2: Household interview questionnaire

This survey is conducted to set up a baseline for “Regional Fisher Livelihood

VILLAGE / COMMUNE / DISTRICT /

0.1. Interviewee name

0.3. Sex  Male  Female

0.7. Number of laborers in HH

0.8. Number of people in HH

Understanding and expectations of the concept “co-management”

Practices in current management systems:

1.7. To what extent did you participate in fishery management activities?

Very Effective Not effective No idea

1.14. Who have more benefits from fishery resources?

Men Women The same No idea

II. SAFETY AT SEA

2.2. To what extent can you access to information on SAS

2.4. How useful is the SAS information to your family ?

Awareness / compliance with safety regulations.

Shipping safety equipment   