Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CLASS III: No Benefit (MODERATE) Benefit = Risk COR and LOE are determined independently (any COR may be paired with any LOE).
(Generally, LOE A or B use only)
A recommendation with LOE C does not imply that the recommendation is weak.
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations: Many important clinical questions addressed in guidelines do not lend themselves to
Is not recommended clinical trials. Although RCTs are unavailable, there may be a very clear clinical
consensus that a particular test or therapy is useful or effective.
Is not indicated/useful/effective/beneficial
* The outcome or result of the intervention should be specified (an improved clinical
Should not be performed/administered/other outcome or increased diagnostic accuracy or incremental prognostic information).
† For comparative-effectiveness recommendations (CORI and Ila; LOE A and B only),
CLASS III: Harm (STRONG) Risk > Benefit studies that support the use of comparator verbs should involve direct comparisons
of the treatments or strategies being evaluated.
Suggested phrases for writing recommendations:
‡ The method of assessing quality is evolving, including the application of
Potentially harmful standardized, widely used, and preferably validated evidence grading tools; and
Causes harm for systematic reviews, the incorporation of an Evidence Review Committee.
Associated with excess morbidity/mortality COR indicates Class of Recommendation; EO, expert opinion; LD, limited data; LOE,
Should not be performed/administered/other Level of Evidence; NR, nonrandomized; R, randomized; and RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 1. Criteria and language for class of recommendation and level of evidence.
The following question was asked of the systematic reviewers: literature search included in this systematic review was updated to
In adults and children in any setting (in-hospital or out-of-hospital) include all publications identified through August 15, 2017.
with cardiac arrest and a shockable rhythm (VF/pVT) at any time It is important for clinicians to note that this review did not
during CPR or immediately after return of spontaneous circulation examine the optimal sequence of advanced life support interventions
(ROSC), is there evidence that administering (intravenous or for VF/pVT cardiac arrest, such as ideal timing of administering
intraosseous) an antiarrhythmic drug during CPR or immediately a vasopressor or antiarrhythmic or the timing of medication
(within 1 hour) after ROSC compared with administering any administration in relation to CPR or shock delivery. The optimal
other antiarrhythmic drug or placebo or no drug during CPR or sequence is not known. In addition, the timing of recommended
immediately (within 1 hour) after ROSC affects outcomes? These ACLS and PALS interventions should consider the individual patient
outcomes include survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic and the environment of care.
outcome and survival to hospital discharge; ROSC was rated as an The following content summarizes the updated recommendations
important outcome. For antiarrhythmic drug use within 1 hour after and algorithms contained in the 2018 AHA Guidelines Focused
ROSC, rearrest was also evaluated as an important outcome. The Updates on ACLS and PALS.
3
Figure 2. Adult Cardiac Arrest Algorithm.
5
The goal of continuous
evidence evaluation is to
shorten the interval between
publication of resuscitation
evidence and translation into
guidelines recommendations
by ILCOR member councils,
such as the AHA.
7
Recommended Reading
Duff JP, Topjian A, Berg MD, et al. 2018 American Heart Association focused update on pediatric advanced life support: an update to the American Heart Association
guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care [published online November 5, 2018]. Circulation.
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000612
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation website. www.ilcor.org. Accessed July 30, 2018.
Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, et al; for the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1711-1722.
Panchal AR, Berg KM, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. 2018 American Heart Association focused update on advanced cardiovascular life support use of antiarrhythmic
drugs during and immediately after cardiac arrest: an update to the American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency
cardiovascular care [published online November 5, 2018]. Circulation. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000613
Soar J, Donnino MW, Aickin R, et al. 2018 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment
recommendations summary [published online November 5, 2018]. Circulation. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000611
Valdes SO, Donoghue AJ, Hoyme DB, et al; for the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators. Outcomes associated with
amiodarone and lidocaine in the treatment of in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest with pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation.
2014;85:381-386.