EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

Week 2 Assignment (155 Points)

Overview
In this week’s assignment, you will have an opportunity to participate in a web conference, write
your vision of educational technology, reflect on course-embedded assignments from EDLD
5362 Information Systems Management and EDLD 5364 Teaching with Technology. You will
also read Chapters 3 and 4 from your text and reflect on Technology Facilitator Standard III –
Teaching, Learning, and the Curriculum and Technology Facilitator Standard IV – Assessment
and Evaluation.
This assignment is due no later than 11:59 p.m. on the seventh day of Week 2.

2010 Lamar University Page 1 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

Rubric
Use the following Rubric to guide your work on the Week 2 Assignment.

Tasks Accomplished/ Proficient/ Needs Unaccepta

Exceeds Standards Meets Improvem ble/
Standards ent/ Does Not
Point Range: Approach Meet
(137-151) Point es Standards
Range: Standards
(116-136) Point Point
Range: Range:
(104-115) (0-103)

Assignmen Student participated Student did

t 2.1 — in a Web conference, not
Web documented participate
Conferenc experience in the in a web
e student e-Portfolio conference,
(1 point) wiki/blog/Google site, did not
and submitted the link document
to the instructional experience
associate. in the
(Maximum 1 Point) student wiki
or blog, and
did not
submit the
link to the
instructiona
l associate.
(0 Points)

Assignmen Student completes the Completes Does not Does not

t 2.2 alignment with each complete complete
Addition to position goals (15 “Accomplis each each
Comprehe points), alignment hed” “Accomplis required
nsive with educational Comprehen hed” “Accomplis
Exam — Ed technology leadership sive Exam Comprehen hed”
Tech goals (15 points), criteria in sive Exam Comprehen
Vision references current APA style, criteria, sive Exam
(50 points) Horizon Report (15 with 3 or inaccurate criteria,
points), uses APA style fewer use of APA substantiall
(5 points), and errors. style and/or y
submits the link to a (Maximum four or inaccurate
Word Document 44 Points) more use of APA
(stored on the e- errors. style and
Portfolio (Maximu more than
wiki/blog/Google site) m 39 4 errors.
to the instructional

2010 Lamar University Page 2 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

associate. Points) (Maximum

(5 points) 35 Points)

(Maximum 50
Points)

Assignmen Note: Reflection at Student Student Student

ts 2.3 a critical level work work work is
Reflections means writing text contains contains incomplete,
for EDLD that reveals your the the late with
5362 opinion of the reading following: following: completion,
Informatio or experience, why - 1 to 2 - Numerous or shows a
n Systems you hold that opinion, minimal errors general
Manageme how the errors failure to
nt Course- experience/assignmen - Little follow
Embedded t/reading could be - effort, expectation
Assignmen improved, how you Demonstrat limited s outlined
ts see the reading or es effort, research, in the
experience as some little “Accomplis
(25 points) research, creativity.
consistent or hed” rubric.
inconsistent with what and some - Posting
creativity. (Maximu
you have learned so reflects less m 17
far, implications for - Posting than a points)
the future, etc. reflects a paragraph.
Reflection should minimum - Posting is
include more content of one not related
than just a recitation short to the
of facts and you paragraph. content
should document your
- Posting from the
writing with a
mostly a assignment
minimum of 3
recitation .
references.
of facts - Little
Self –Assessment from evidence of
1. Critically reflect assignment prior
(see note above; not . knowledge
just recitation of facts)
- Some referencing
upon the knowledge
evidence of work
you gained from the
prior experience,
assignment.
knowledge prior
(3 Points) referencing coursework
2. Critically reflect work , readings
upon the relationship experience, and/or
between any new prior assignment
information you coursework s.
gained from the , readings, - No
assignment with old or mention of
information you assignment points from
previously held to be s. the
true.

2010 Lamar University Page 3 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

(2 Points) - Mentions readings.

3. How did the one specific - Little
relationship between point from sources or
the old and new the references.
information you assignment
- Little
learned affect your - Evidence writing in
personal experience the narrative
with the assignment? response style and/or
(2 Points) directs the pervasive
quotation, inappropria
Learn as a Learner a question, te
statement, grammar.
1. Critically reflect or a
(see note above; not previous This
just recitation of facts) posting document
upon your approach using APA is posted to
and strategies used in style. the student
completing the wiki.
assignment. - Cites
some (Maximum
(3 Points) 19 points)
sources
2. Critically reflect and
upon how you learn as references
a learner and how you from
assess your own assignment
performance in s.
completing the
assignment(s). (2 - Writes
Points) primarily in
narrative
3. How did your style with
learning and appropriate
interaction with grammar.
colleagues (such as
discussion forum, web - This
conferences, wiki and document
blog participation, is posted to
etc.) affect the results the student
of your performance? wiki.
(2 Points) (Maximum
23 points)
Lifelong Learning
Skills
1. Critically reflect
(see note above; not
just recitation of facts)
upon what you gained
about learning and
how you learn that will
impact your future

2010 Lamar University Page 4 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

learning.
(3 Points)
2. How will your past
interactions and
collaborations with
colleagues impact
your future learning
experiences?
(2 Points)
3. As a lifelong
learner, what
questions or issues
challenge you and are
worthy of future
research or
investigation?
(2 Points)

Additional Criteria
1. Content posted to
e-Portfolio
wiki/blog/Google site
(1 Point)
2. Mechanics
(1 Point)
3. APA Format
(1 Point)
4.Minimum of 3
References
(1 Point)
(Maximum 25 points)

Assignmen Note: Reflection at Student Student Student

t 2.4: a critical level work work work is
Reflections means writing text contains contains incomplete,
for EDLD that reveals your the the late with
5364 opinion of the reading following: following: completion,
Course- or experience, why - 1 to 2 - Numerous or shows a
Embedded you hold that opinion, minimal errors general
Assignmen how the errors failure to
ts experience/assignmen - Little follow
t/reading could be - effort, expectation
(25 points) Demonstrat limited
improved, how you s outlined
see the reading or es effort, research, in the
experience as some little “Accomplis
consistent or research, creativity.

2010 Lamar University Page 5 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

inconsistent with what and some - Posting hed” rubric.

you have learned so creativity. reflects less (Maximu
far, implications for - Posting than a m 17
the future, etc. reflects a paragraph. points)
Reflection should minimum - Posting is
include more content of one not related
than just a recitation short to the
of facts and you paragraph. content
should document your from the
writing with a - Posting
mostly a assignment
minimum of 3 .
references. recitation
of facts - Little
Self –Assessment from evidence of
1. Critically reflect assignment prior
(see note above; not . knowledge
just recitation of facts) referencing
upon the knowledge - Some
evidence of work
you gained from the experience,
assignment. prior
knowledge prior
(3 Points) referencing coursework
2. Critically reflect work , readings
upon the relationship experience, and/or
between any new prior assignment
information you coursework s.
gained from the , readings, - No
assignment with old or mention of
information you assignment points from
previously held to be s. the
true. - Mentions readings.
(2 Points) one specific - Little
3. How did the point from sources or
relationship between the references.
the old and new assignment - Little
information you - Evidence writing in
learned affect your the narrative
personal experience response style and/or
with the assignment? directs the pervasive
(2 Points) quotation, inappropria
a question, te
Learn as a Learner statement, grammar.
or a This
1. Critically reflect previous
(see note above; not document
posting is posted to
just recitation of facts) using APA
upon your approach the student
style. wiki.
and strategies used in
completing the - Cites (Maximum
assignment. some

2010 Lamar University Page 6 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

(3 Points) sources 19 points)

2. Critically reflect and
upon how you learn as references
a learner and how you from
assess your own assignment
performance in s.
completing the - Writes
assignment(s). (2 primarily in
Points) narrative
3. How did your style with
learning and appropriate
interaction with grammar.
colleagues (such as - This
discussion forum, web document
conferences, wiki and is posted to
blog participation, the student
etc.) affect the results wiki.
of your performance? (Maximum
(2 Points) 23 points)

Lifelong Learning
Skills
1. Critically reflect
(see note above; not
just recitation of facts)
upon what you gained
about learning and
how you learn that will
impact your future
learning.
(3 Points)
2. How will your past
interactions and
collaborations with
colleagues impact
your future learning
experiences?
(2 Points)
3. As a lifelong
learner, what
questions or issues
challenge you and are
worthy of future
research or
investigation?
(2 Points)

Additional Criteria

2010 Lamar University Page 7 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

1. Content posted to
e-Portfolio
wiki/blog/Google site
(1 Point)
2. Mechanics
(1 Point)
3. APA Format
(1 Point)
4.Minimum of 3
References
(1 Point)
(Maximum 25 points)

Assignmen Note: Reflection at Student Student Student

t 2.5 a critical level work work work is
Reflections means writing text contains contains incomplete,
for that reveals your the the late with
Technolog opinion of the reading following: following: completion,
y or experience, why - 1 to 2 - Numerous or shows a
Facilitator you hold that opinion, minimal errors general
Standard how the errors failure to
III: experience/assignmen - Little follow
Teaching, t/reading could be - effort, expectation
Learning, improved, how you Demonstrat limited s outlined
and the see the reading or es effort, research, in the
Curriculum experience as some little “Accomplis
consistent or research, creativity. hed”
(25 points) and some
inconsistent with what - Posting column of
you have learned so creativity. reflects less this rubric.
far, implications for - Posting than a (Maximu
the future, etc. reflects a paragraph. m 17
Reflection should minimum points)
- Posting is
include more content of one not related
than just a recitation short to the
of facts and you paragraph. content
should document your
- Posting from the
writing with a
mostly a assignment
minimum of 3
recitation .
references.
of facts - Little
Self –Assessment from evidence of
1. Critically reflect assignment prior
(see note above; not . knowledge
just recitation of facts)
- Some referencing
upon the knowledge
evidence of work
you gained from the
prior experience,
reading.
knowledge prior

2010 Lamar University Page 8 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

(3 Points) referencing coursework

2. Critically reflect work , readings
upon the relationship experience, and/or
between any new prior assignment
information you coursework s.
gained from the , readings, - No
reading with old or mention of
information you assignment points from
previously held to be s. the
true. -Mentions readings.
(2 Points) one specific - Little
point from sources or
3. How did the the
relationship between references.
assignment
the old and new - Little
information you - Evidence writing in
learned affect your the narrative
personal experience response style and/or
with implementing the directs the pervasive
Standard and quotation, inappropria
Indicators in your a question, te
field-based internship statement, grammar.
activities? or a
previous This
(2 Points) posting document
Learn as a Learner using APA is posted to
style. the student
1. Critically reflect wiki.
upon your approach -Cites some
and strategies used in sources (Maximum
implementing the and 19 points)
Standard and references
Indicators in your from
field-based internship assignment
activities. s.
(3 Points) -Writes
2. Critically reflect primarily in
upon how you learn as narrative
a learner and how you style with
assess your own appropriate
performance in grammar.
implementing the This
Standard and document
Indicators in your is posted to
field-based internship the student
activities. wiki.
(2 Points)
(Maximum
3. How did your 23 points)
learning and

2010 Lamar University Page 9 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

interaction with
colleagues (such as
discussion forum, web
conferences, wiki and
blog participation,
etc.) affect the results
of your performance
with respect to
implementing the
Standard and
Indicators in your
field-based internship
activities?
(2 Points)

Lifelong Learning
Skills
1. Critically reflect
upon what you gained
about learning and
how you learn that will
impact your future
learning regarding the
implementation of the
Standard and
Indicators.
(3 Points)
2. How will your past
interactions and
collaborations with
colleagues impact
your future learning
experiences with
regard to the
implementation of the
Standard and
Indicators?
(2 Points)
3. As a lifelong
learner, what
questions or issues
challenge you and are
worthy of future
research or
investigation with
regard to the
implementation of the
Standard and
Indicators?

2010 Lamar University Page 10 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

(2 Points)

Additional Criteria
1. Content posted on
the e-Portfolio
wiki/blog/Google site
(1 Point)
2. Mechanics
(1 Point)
3. APA Format
(1 Point)
4. Minimum of 3
References
(1 Point)
(Maximum 25
points)

Part 2.6-- Note: Reflection at Student Student Student

Reflections a critical level work work work is
for means writing text contains contains incomplete,
Technolog that reveals your the the late with
y opinion of the reading following: following: completion,
Facilitator or experience, why - 1 to 2 - Numerous or shows a
Standard you hold that opinion, minimal errors general
IV: how the errors failure to
Assessmen experience/assignmen - Little follow
t and t/reading could be - effort, expectation
Evaluation improved, how you Demonstrat limited s outlined in
see the reading or es effort, research, the
(25 points) some little
experience as “Accomplis
consistent or research, creativity. hed”
inconsistent with what and some - Posting column of
you have learned so creativity. reflects less this rubric.
far, implications for - Posting than a (Maximu
the future, etc. reflects a paragraph. m 17
Reflection should minimum points)
- Posting is
include more content of one not related
than just a recitation short to the
of facts and you paragraph. content
should document your
- Posting from the
writing with a
mostly a assignment
minimum of 3
recitation .
references.
of facts - Little
Self –Assessment from evidence of
1. Critically reflect assignment prior
(see note above; not . knowledge
just recitation of facts)
- Some referencing
upon the knowledge

2010 Lamar University Page 11 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

you gained from the evidence of work

reading. prior experience,
(3 Points) knowledge prior
referencing coursework
2. Critically reflect work , readings
upon the relationship experience, and/or
between any new prior assignment
information you coursework s.
gained from the , readings,
reading with old - No
or mention of
information you assignment
previously held to be points from
s. the
true.
-Mentions readings.
(2 Points) one specific - Little
3. How did the point from sources or
relationship between the references.
the old and new assignment
information you - Little
- Evidence writing in
learned affect your the
personal experience narrative
response style and/or
with implementing the directs the
Standard and pervasive
quotation, inappropria
Indicators in your a question,
field-based internship te
statement, grammar.
activities? or a
(2 Points) previous This
posting document
Learn as a Learner is posted to
using APA
1. Critically reflect style. the student
upon your approach wiki.
-Cites some
and strategies used in (Maximum
sources
implementing the 19 points)
and
Standard and
references
Indicators in your
from
field-based internship
assignment
activities.
s.
(3 Points)
-Writes
2. Critically reflect
primarily in
upon how you learn as
narrative
a learner and how you
style with
assess your own
appropriate
performance in
grammar.
implementing the
Standard and This
Indicators in your document
field-based internship is posted to
activities. the student
(2 Points) wiki.

2010 Lamar University Page 12 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

3. How did your (Maximum

learning and 23 points)
interaction with
colleagues (such as
discussion forum, web
conferences, wiki and
blog participation,
etc.) affect the results
of your performance
with respect to
implementing the
Standard and
Indicators in your
field-based internship
activities?
(2 Points)

Lifelong Learning
Skills
1. Critically reflect
upon what you gained
about learning and
how you learn that
will impact your future
learning regarding the
implementation of the
Standard and
Indicators.
(3 Points)
2. How will your past
interactions and
collaborations with
colleagues impact
your future learning
experiences with
regard to the
implementation of the
Standard and
Indicators?
(2 Points)
3. As a lifelong
learner, what
questions or issues
challenge you and are
worthy of future
research or
investigation with
regard to the
implementation of the

2010 Lamar University Page 13 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

Standard and
Indicators?
(2 Points)

Additional Criteria
1. Content posted on
the e-Portfolio
wiki/blog/Google site
(1 Point)
2. Mechanics
(1 Point)
3. APA Format
(1 Point)
4. Minimum of 3
References
(1 Point)
(Maximum 25
points)

2010 Lamar University Page 14 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Week 2 Assignment, Part 1.1: Web Conferences--Organization and Management of
Assignments (1 Point)

Workspace
Please provide the link to your e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site in the box below.

http://robersonsedldinternship.wikispaces.com

2010 Lamar University Page 15 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

Week 2 Assignment, Part 2.2: Week Two Addition to Comprehensive Examination

(50 Points)
The Final Report should encompass your total internship experience. Components should
include the following:
• Your vision of educational technology using the most current Horizon K-12 Report as
a resource (15 points). This section of your comprehensive exam should follow your
introduction goal statement (15 points), and educational technology leadership goals
(15 points). (Week 2 or designated date as stated by your instructor.)
• Using Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Ed.,
October 2009 or later, p. 41-59, prepare the vision paper for the next section of your
comprehensive examination paper (5 points).
• Create the Comprehensive Exam content in a Word Document and store the
document on your e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site. Submit the link to your document
to the instructional associate.

2010 Lamar University Page 16 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Workspace
Please provide the link to your e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site in the box below.

http://robersonsedldinternship.wikispaces.com/Horizon+Report

2010 Lamar University Page 17 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Week 2 Assignment, Part 2.3: Reflections on Course-Embedded Assignments for EDLD
5362 Information Systems Management as shown in the Internship Handbook, Course-
Embedded Assignment document in the Resource section of the course. (25 points)

Directions:
Write and post your reflections for each course-embedded assignment on your ePortfolio/
wiki/blog/Google site.
Course-Embedded Assignment Reflections should follow the rubric content listed below:

Note: Reflection at a critical level means writing text that reveals your opinion of the reading
or experience, why you hold that opinion, how the experience/assignment/reading could be
improved, how you see the reading or experience as consistent or inconsistent with what you
have learned so far, implications for the future, etc. Reflection should include more content
than just a recitation of facts and you should document your writing with a minimum of 3
references.
Self–Assessment
• Critically reflect (see note above; not just recitation of facts) upon the
knowledge you gained from the assignment. (3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon the relationship between any new information you gained
from the assignment with old information you previously held to be true. (2 Points)
• How did the relationship between the old and new information you learned
affect your personal experience with the assignment? (2 Points)
Learn as a Learner
• Critically reflect upon your approach and strategies used in completing the
assignment. (3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon how you learn as a learner and how you assess your own
performance in completing the assignment(s). (2 Points)
• How did your learning and interaction with colleagues (such as discussion
forum, web conferences, wiki and blog participation, etc.) affect the results of your
performance?
(2 Points)
Lifelong Learning Skills
• Critically reflect upon what you gained about learning and how you learn that
will impact your future learning. (3 Points)
• How will your past interactions and collaborations with colleagues impact your
future learning experiences? (2 Points)
• As a lifelong learner, what questions or issues challenge you and are worthy of
future research or investigation? (2 Points)
Additional Criteria
• Content posted to e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site (1 Point)
• Mechanics (1 Point)
• APA Format (1 Point)

2010 Lamar University Page 18 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
• Minimum of 3 References (1 Point)
(Maximum 25 points)

2010 Lamar University Page 19 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Workspace
Provide the e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site link to your reflections on EDLD 5362 Information
Systems Management below.

http://robersonsedldinternship.wikispaces.com/EDLD+5362

2010 Lamar University Page 20 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Week 2 Assignment, Part 2.4: Reflections on Course-Embedded Assignments for EDLD
5364 Teaching with Technology as shown in the Internship Handbook, Course-
Embedded Assignment document in the Resource section of the course. (25 points)

Write and post your reflections for each course-embedded assignment on your ePortfolio/
wiki/blog/Google site.
Course-Embedded Assignment Reflections should follow the rubric content listed below:

Note: Reflection at a critical level means writing text that reveals your opinion of the reading
or experience, why you hold that opinion, how the experience/assignment/reading could be
improved, how you see the reading or experience as consistent or inconsistent with what you
have learned so far, implications for the future, etc. Reflection should include more content
than just a recitation of facts and you should document your writing with a minimum of 3
references.
Self–Assessment
• Critically reflect (see note above; not just recitation of facts) upon the
knowledge you gained from the assignment. (3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon the relationship between any new information you gained
from the assignment with old information you previously held to be true. (2 Points)
• How did the relationship between the old and new information you learned
affect your personal experience with the assignment? (2 Points)
Learn as a Learner
• Critically reflect upon your approach and strategies used in completing the
assignment. (3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon how you learn as a learner and how you assess your own
performance in completing the assignment(s). (2 Points)
• How did your learning and interaction with colleagues (such as discussion
forum, web conferences, wiki and blog participation, etc.) affect the results of your
performance?
(2 Points)
Lifelong Learning Skills
• Critically reflect upon what you gained about learning and how you learn that
will impact your future learning. (3 Points)
• How will your past interactions and collaborations with colleagues impact your
future learning experiences? (2 Points)
• As a lifelong learner, what questions or issues challenge you and are worthy of
future research or investigation? (2 Points)
Additional Criteria
• Content posted to e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site (1 Point)
• Mechanics (1 Point)
• APA Format (1 Point)
• Minimum of 3 References (1 Point)
(Maximum 25 points)

2010 Lamar University Page 21 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Workspace
Provide the e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site link to your reflections on EDLD 5364 Teaching
with Technology below.

http://robersonsedldinternship.wikispaces.com/EDLD+5364

2010 Lamar University Page 22 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Week 2 Assignment, Part 2.5-6: Reflections on the readings in Chapters Three and Four of
your text, ISTE’s Technology Facilitation and Leadership Standards, pages 57-99.
(50 points total)
Beyond educational computing and technology foundations for teachers, ISTE has established
Technology Facilitation Standards for teacher education programs or professional development
that prepare candidates to serve as building/campus-level technology facilitators. Candidates
completing this program will exhibit knowledge, skills, and dispositions equipping them to teach
technology applications; demonstrate effective use of technology to support student learning of
content; and provide professional development, mentoring, and basic technical assistance for
other educators. Technology Facilitation Standards III and IV:
TF-III Teaching, Learning, and the Curriculum
Educational technology facilitators apply and implement curriculum plans that
include methods and strategies for utilizing technology to maximize student
learning.
TF-IV Assessment and Evaluation
Educational technology facilitators apply technology to facilitate a variety of
effective assessment and evaluation strategies.
In Week 2, reflect on the readings in Chapters Three and Four of your text, ISTE’s Technology
Facilitation and Leadership Standards, pages 57-99 and post your reflections for each standard
on your wiki or other approved web-based tool site.
Assignment 2-5: Reflections on Technology Facilitator Standard III: Teaching, Learning,
and the Curriculum in your textbook. (25 points)
Directions:
Write and post your reflections for your Technology Facilitator Standard III readings on your
ePortfolio/ wiki/blog/Google site.
Your Technology Facilitator Standard I Reflections should follow the rubric content listed
below:

Note: Reflection at a critical level means writing text that reveals your opinion of the reading
or experience, why you hold that opinion, how the experience/assignment/reading could be
improved, how you see the reading or experience as consistent or inconsistent with what you
have learned so far, implications for the future, etc. Reflection should include more content
than just a recitation of facts and you should document your writing with a minimum of 3
references.
Self –Assessment
• Critically reflect (see note above; not just recitation of facts) upon the
knowledge you gained from the reading. (3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon the relationship between any new information you gained
from the reading with old information you previously held to be true. (2 Points)
• How did the relationship between the old and new information you learned
affect your personal experience with implementing the Standard and Indicators in your
field-based internship activities? (2 Points)

2010 Lamar University Page 23 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship

Learn as a Learner
• Critically reflect upon your approach and strategies used in implementing the
Standard and Indicators in your field-based internship activities.
(3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon how you learn as a learner and how you assess your own
performance in implementing the Standard and Indicators in your field-based internship
activities.
(2 Points)
• How did your learning and interaction with colleagues (such as discussion
forum, web conferences, wiki and blog participation, etc.) affect the results of your
performance with respect to implementing the Standard and Indicators in your field-
based internship activities?
(2 Points)
Lifelong Learning Skills
• Critically reflect upon what you gained about learning and how you learn that
will impact your future learning regarding the implementation of the Standard and
Indicators. (3 Points)
• How will your past interactions and collaborations with colleagues impact your
future learning experiences with regard to the implementation of the Standard and
Indicators?
(2 Points)
• As a lifelong learner, what questions or issues challenge you and are worthy of
future research or investigation with regard to the implementation of the Standard and
Indicators? (2 Points)
Additional Criteria
• Content posted to e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site (1 Point)
• Mechanics (1 Point)
• APA Format (1 Point)
• Minimum of 3 References (1 Point)
(Maximum 25 points)

2010 Lamar University Page 24 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Workspace
Provide the e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site link to your reflections on Technology Facilitator
Standard III: Teaching, Learning, and the Curriculum below.

http://robersonsedldinternship.wikispaces.com/Standard+3

2010 Lamar University Page 25 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Assignment 2-6: Reflections on Technology Facilitator Standard IV: Assessment and
Evaluation in your textbook. (25 points)

Directions:
Write and post your reflections for your Technology Facilitator Standard II readings on your
ePortfolio/ wiki/blog/Google site.
Your Technology Facilitator Standard IV Reflections should follow the rubric content
listed below:
Note: Reflection at a critical level means writing text that reveals your opinion of the reading
or experience, why you hold that opinion, how the experience/assignment/reading could be
improved, how you see the reading or experience as consistent or inconsistent with what you
have learned so far, implications for the future, etc. Reflection should include more content
than just a recitation of facts and you should document your writing with a minimum of 3
references.
Self –Assessment
• Critically reflect (see note above; not just recitation of facts) upon the
knowledge you gained from the reading. (3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon the relationship between any new information you gained
from the reading with old information you previously held to be true. (2 Points)
• How did the relationship between the old and new information you learned
affect your personal experience with implementing the Standard and Indicators in your
field-based internship activities? (2 Points)
Learn as a Learner
• Critically reflect upon your approach and strategies used in implementing the
Standard and Indicators in your field-based internship activities.
(3 Points)
• Critically reflect upon how you learn as a learner and how you assess your own
performance in implementing the Standard and Indicators in your field-based internship
activities.
(2 Points)
• How did your learning and interaction with colleagues (such as discussion
forum, web conferences, wiki and blog participation, etc.) affect the results of your
performance with respect to implementing the Standard and Indicators in your field-
based internship activities?
(2 Points)
Lifelong Learning Skills
• Critically reflect upon what you gained about learning and how you learn that
will impact your future learning regarding the implementation of the Standard and
Indicators. (3 Points)
• How will your past interactions and collaborations with colleagues impact your
future learning experiences with regard to the implementation of the Standard and
Indicators?
(2 Points)

2010 Lamar University Page 26 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
• As a lifelong learner, what questions or issues challenge you and are worthy of
future research or investigation with regard to the implementation of the Standard and
Indicators? (2 Points)
Additional Criteria
• Content posted to e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site (1 Point)
• Mechanics (1 Point)
• APA Format (1 Point)
• Minimum of 3 References (1 Point)
(Maximum 25 points)

2010 Lamar University Page 27 of 28

EDLD 5370 Educational Technology Leadership Internship
Workspace
Provide the e-Portfolio wiki/blog/Google site link to your reflections on Technology Facilitator
Standard IV: Assessment and Evaluation below.

http://robersonsedldinternship.wikispaces.com/Standard+4

2010 Lamar University Page 28 of 28