International prospective register of systematic reviews
Is the presence of sleep bruxism a risk factor for failures in all-ceramic restorations? A systematic review Gilberto Melo, Elis Ângela Batistella, Eduardo Bertazzo-Silveira, Thais Marques Gonçalves, Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes Souza, André Porporatti, Carlos Flores-Mir, Graziela De Luca Canto Citation Gilberto Melo, Elis Ângela Batistella, Eduardo Bertazzo-Silveira, Thais Marques Gonçalves, Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes Souza, André Porporatti, Carlos Flores-Mir, Graziela De Luca Canto. Is the presence of sleep bruxism a risk factor for failures in all-ceramic restorations? A systematic review. PROSPERO 2016 CRD42016048478 Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42016048478 Review question Among individuals with all-ceramic restorations, is the presence of sleep bruxism a risk factor in the longterm survival rate of the restorations? Searches We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases: EMBASE, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed (including MEDLINE), ScienceDirect, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Methodology Register), and Web of Science. The search terms will be adapted for use with other bibliographic databases in combination with databasespecific filters for controlled trials, where these are available. There will be no language or publication date restrictions. Additional search strategy details can be found in the attached PDF document (link provided below). Types of study to be included Inclusion: Observational studies and clinical trials.Exclusion: Reviews, case-reports, protocols, personal opinions, letters, posters, conference abstracts, and laboratory research. Condition or domain being studied Sleep bruxism (SB) is a stereotyped movement disorder characterized by grinding or clenching of the teeth during sleep, and can lead to abnormal wear of the teeth, periodontal tissue damage, or jaw pain. Indirect dental restorations are one of the most widespread procedures in dentistry and, as the demand for aesthetic restorations grows, ceramic materials are at increased use. The mechanical behavior of dental ceramics when subjected to tensile or compressive stress is related to their survival and failure rates. Therefore, the presence of SB might be a risk factor for failure in all-ceramic restorations. Participants/population Inclusion: Studies in which individuals with all-ceramic restoration(s) were included. Exclusion: Studies in which members of the sample had craniofacial anomalies, genetic syndromes, or neuromuscular diseases. Studies in which members of the sample were children (younger than 13 years of age). Intervention(s), exposure(s) Inclusion: Studies that evaluated the presence of sleep bruxism in patients with all-ceramic restorations. Exclusion: Studies that evaluated the survival rates of removable or implant-supported prostheses, as well as metal-ceramics, composite resins, and ceromer restorations. Studies in which follow-up periods were less PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews than six months. Studies that had missing information, no bruxism group, or different objective. Comparator(s)/control Inclusion: Individuals with all-ceramic restorations and without sleep bruxism. Exclusion: Studies in which sleep bruxism had no or unclarified diagnostic criteria (even after trying to contact the author). Context Primary outcome(s) Association between sleep bruxism and failure (fracture, cracks, chipping, or debonding) for all- ceramic restorations. Timing and effect measures Relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), or hazard ratio (HR). Studies with a minimum follow-up time of six months. Secondary outcome(s) Survival rate of all-ceramic restorations. Data extraction (selection and coding) Three independent reviewers (1R, 2R and 3R) will collect data from the selected articles. Subsequently, the retrieved information will be cross-checked. Any disagreement will be discussed between the three reviewers and a fourth reviewer (4R). The following data will be extracted and recorded in duplicate by three reviewers for each included study: author; year of publication; country; characteristics of the participants (n, age); outcome measure(s); pertinent result(s) and conclusion(s). Risk of bias (quality) assessment The methodology of selected studies will be evaluated by the Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (MAStARI) specific for cohort studies. Risk of bias will be categorized as “high” when the study reaches up to 49% (score “yes”); “moderate” when the study reached 50% to 69% (score “yes”); and “low” when the study reached more than 70% (score “yes”). The methodological quality of the included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) will be evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias (Higgins and Green, 2011). Briefly, the randomization and allocation methods will be classified as adequate, inadequate, or unclear, whereas the completeness of the follow-up period, the blinding of the examiners, selective reporting and other forms of bias will be coded as “yes/no” responses. Non-RCTs will be assessed by the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Strategy for data synthesis If a quantitative synthesis is appropriate, a method of survival rate meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan software version 5. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Q test and I-squared statistics. Study type will also be considered in a synthesis analysis, if applicable. Analysis of subgroups or subsets If applicable, we will classify the data into subgroups based on the specific type of dental work (inlays, onlays, crowns, or veneers), the region of the mouth (anterior or posterior), and/or the type of dental ceramics used (silicate or zirconia). PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Contact details for further information Gilberto Melo melo.gilberto@hotmail.com Organisational affiliation of the review Federal University of Santa Catarina http://ufsc.br Review team members and their organisational affiliations Dr Gilberto Melo. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Dr Elis Ângela Batistella. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Dr Eduardo Bertazzo- Silveira. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Professor Thais Marques Gonçalves. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Professor Beatriz Dulcineia Mendes Souza. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Professor André Porporatti. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Professor Carlos Flores-Mir. School of Dentistry University of AlbertaProfessor Graziela De Luca Canto. Department of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Anticipated or actual start date 01 October 2016 Anticipated completion date 30 January 2017 Funding sources/sponsors Not applicable Conflicts of interest None known Language English Country Brazil, Canada Stage of review Completed but not published Subject index terms status Subject indexing assigned by CRD Subject index terms Ceramics; Dental Porcelain; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Restoration, Permanent; Dental Restoration Wear; Humans; Risk Factors; Sleep Bruxism Date of registration in PROSPERO 27 September 2016 Date of publication of this version 21 July 2017 Revision note for this version PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Manuscript was accepted, but not published yet. Versions 21 July 2017 19 April 2017 05 October 2016 04 October 2016 27 September 2016 Stage of review at time of this submission Stage Started Completed Preliminary searches Yes Yes Piloting of the study selection process Yes Yes Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria Yes Yes Data extraction Yes Yes Risk of bias (quality) assessment Yes Yes Data analysis Yes Yes PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites.