Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
Agency is a special type of contract. The concept of agency was developed as one cannot possibly
do every transaction himself. Hence, he should have opportunity or facility to transact business
through others like an agent. Principles of contract of agency- (a) Expecting matters of a personal
nature, what a person can do himself, he can also do it through agent (e.g. a person cannot
marry through an agent, as it is a matter of personal nature). (b) A person acting through an
agent is acting himself, i.e. act of agent is act of principal. Since agency is a contract, all usual
requirements of a valid contract are applicable to agency contract also except to the extent
excluded in the Act. One important distinction is that as per Sec. 185, no consideration is
necessary to create an agency.
Who may employee an agent- Any person who is of the age of majority according to the law to
which he is subject, and who is of sound mind, may employee an agent (Sec. 183). Thus any
person competent to contract can appoint an agent.
Who may be an agent- As between the principal and third person any person can become an
agent, but no person who is not of the age of majority and of sound mind can become an agent,
so as to be responsible to his principal according to the provisions in that behalf herein contained
(Sec. 184). The significance is that a principal can appoint a minor or person of unsound mind as
agent. In such case, the principal is responsible to third parties.
Definition
According to Sec 182 defines an ‘Agent’ as “a person employed to do any act for another or to
represent another in dealings with third person”. The person for whom such act is done or who is
represented is called the principal. The relationship between the agent and the principal is called
“agency”.
Principles of Agency
Contracts of agency are based on two important principles, namely:
1. Whatever a person can do personally shall also be allowed to be done through an agent
except in case of contracts involving personal services such as painting, marriage, singing,
etc.
2. He who does not act through a duly authorized agent does it by himself, i.e., the act of the
agent are considered the acts of the principal (Sec. 226).
Rights of Agent
An agent has the following rights against the principal:
1. Right to receive remuneration (Sees. 219 and 220):
The agent is entitled to receive his agreed remuneration, or if nothing is agreed, to a reasonable
remuneration, unless he agrees to act gratuitously. In the absence of any special contract, the
right to claim remuneration arises only when the agent has done what he had undertaken to do.
It is important that the agent can claim remuneration once he has completed his work even
though the contract is never executed on account of breach either by the principal or the third
party. For example, where an agent is appointed to secure order-s for the manufacturer, he can
claim commission on orders actually obtained by him although the manufacturer is unable to
execute them owing to a strike by the workmen.
Effect of misconduct:
An agent who is guilty of misconduct in the business of the agency is not entitled to any
remuneration in respect of that part of the business which he has misconduct. In addition, he is
liable to compensate the principal for any loss caused by the misconduct.
ILLUSTRATIONS (appended to Sec. 220):
(a) A employs B to recover 1, 00,000 rupees from C, and to lay it out on good security. B
recovers the 1,00,000 rupees and lays out 90,000 rupees on good security, but lays out 10,000
rupees on security which he ought to have known to be bad, whereby A loses 2,000 rupees. B is
entitled to remuneration for recovering the 1, 00,000 rupees and for investing the 90,000 rupees,
He is not entitled to any remuneration for investing the 10,000 rupees and he must make' good
the loss of 2,000 rupees' to A.
(b) A employs B to recover Rs 1,000 from C. Through B's misconduct the' money is not recovered
(the debt might have become time-barred because of B's negligence or leniency). B is entitled to
no remuneration for his services and must make good the loss to A.
5. Right to be indemnified against consequences of acts done in good faith (Sec. 223):
An agent has a right to be indemnified against the consequences of an act done in good faith
though it turns out to be injurious to the rights of third persons.
ILLUSTRATIONS (appended to Sec. 223):
(a) A, a decree holder and entitled to execution of B's goods, requires the officer of the Court to
seize certain goods, representing them to be the goods of B. The officer seizes the goods, and is
sued bye, the true owner of the goods. A is liable' to indemnify the officer for the sum which he is
compelled to pay to C in consequence of obeying A's directions.
(b) B, at the request of A, sells goods on the possession of A, but which A had no right to dispose
of. B does not know this and hands over the proceeds of the sale to A. Afterwards C, the true
owner of the goods, sues B and recovers the value of the goods and costs. A is liable to indemnify
B for what he has been compelled to pay to e and for B's own expenses.
Duties of Agent
An agent has the following duties towards the principal:
1. Duty to follow principal's directions or customs (Sec. 211):
The first duty of every agent is to act within the scope of the authority conferred upon him and
perform the agency work according to the directions given by the principal. When the\agent acts
otherwise, if any loss be sustained, he must make it good to the principal, and if any profit
accrues, he must account for it.
ILLUSTRATIONS:
(a) Where the principal instructed the agent to warehouse the goods at a particular place and the
agent warehoused them at a different warehouse which was equally safe, and the goods were
destroyed by fire without negligence, it was held that the agent was liable for the loss because
any departure from the instructions makes the agent absolutely, liable (Lilley vs. Doubleday).
(b) An agent being instructed to insure goods neglects to do so. He is liable to compensate the
principal in the event of their being lost (Pannatal Jankidas vs. Mohanlal).
If the principal has not given any express or implied directions, then it is the duty of the agent to
follow the custom prevailing in the same kind of business at the place where the agent conducts
business. If the agent makes any departure, he does so at his own risk. He must make good any
loss so sustained by the principal.
ILLUSTRATIONS: (appended to Sec. 21 I):
(a) A, an agent, engaged in carrying on for B a business, in which it is the custom to invest from
time to time at interest, the moneys which may be in hand, omits to make such investments. A
must make good to B the interest usually obtained by such investments.
(b) B, a broker, in whose business it is not the custom to sell on credit, sells goods of A on credit
to C, whose credit at the time was very high. C, before payment, becomes insolvent. B must
make good the loss to A, irrespective of his good intentions.
2. Duty to carry out the work with reasonable skill and diligence (Sec. 212):
The agent must conduct the business of the agency with as much skill as is generally possessed
by persons engaged in similar business, unless the principal has notice of his want of skill.
Further, the agent must act with reasonable diligence and to the best of his skill.
If the agent does not work with reasonable care, skill (unless the principal has notice of his want
of skill) and diligence, he must make compensation to his principal in respect of 'direct
consequences' of his own neglect, want of skill or misconduct. But he is not so liable for indirect
or remote losses.
ILLUSTRATIONS (appended to Sec. 212):
(a) A, a merchant in Calcutta, has an agent B, in London, to whom a sum of money is paid on A's
account, with orders to remit. B retains the money for a considerable time. A, in consequence of
not receiving the money, becomes insolvent. B is liable for the money and interest from the day
on which it ought to have been paid, according to the usual rate, and for any further direct loss
such as loss by variation of rate of exchange, but nothing further.
(b) A, an agent for the sale of goods, having authority to sell goods on credit, sells to B on credit,
without making the proper and usual enquiries as to the solvency of B. B, at the time of such
sale, is insolvent. A must make compensation to his principal in respect of any loss thereby
sustained.
(c) A, an insurance broker, employed by B to' effect an insurance on a ship, omits to see that the
usual clauses are inserted in the policy. The ship is afterwards lost. In consequence of the
omission of the clauses nothing can be recovered from the underwriters. A is bound to make good
the loss to B.
(d) A, a merchant in England, directs B, his agent at Bombay, who accepts the agency, to send
him 100 bales of cotton by a certain ship. B. having it in his power to send the cotton omits to do
so. The ship arrives safely in England. Soon after her arrival the price of cotton rises. B is bound
to make good to A the profit which he might have made by the 100 bales of cotton at the time the
ship arrived, but not any profit he might have made by the subsequent rise.
5. Duty not to deal on his own account (Sees. 215 and 216):
An agent must not deal on his own account in the business of agency; i.e., he must not himself
buy from or sell to his principal goods he is asked to sell or buy on behalf of his principal; without
obtaining the consent of his principal after disclosing all material facts to him. If the agent
violates this rule, the principal may repudiate the transaction where it can be shown that any
material fact has been knowingly concealed by the agent, or that the dealings of the agent have
been disadvantageous to the principal. The principal is also entitled to claim from the agent any
benefit which may have resu1ted to him from the transaction. '
ILLUSTRATIONS:
(a) A, directs B to sell A's estate. B buys the estate for himself in the name of C. A, on
discovering that B has bought the estate for himself, may repudiate the sale, if he can show ,that
B has dishonestly concealed any material fact or that the sale has been disadvantageous to him.
[Illustration (a) appended to Section 215]
(b) A directs B to sell A's estate. B, on looking over the estate before selling it, finds a mine on
the estate which is unknown to A. B informs A that he wishes to buy the estate for himself but
conceals the discovery of the mine. A allows B to buy, in ignorance of the existence of the mine. A,
on discovering that B knew of the mine at the time he bought the
estate, may either repudiate or adopt the sale at his option. [Illustration (b) appended to Section
215]
(c) A directs, B, his agent, to buy a certain house for him. B tells A that it cannot be bought and
buys the house for himself. A may, on discovering that B has bought the house, compel him to
sell it to A at the price he gave for it. [Illustration appended to section 216]
6. Duty not to make any profit out of his agency except his remuneration (Sees. 217
and 218):
An agent stands in a fiduciary relation to his principal and therefore he must not make any profit
(secret profit) out of his agency. He must pay to his principal all moneys (including illegal grati-
fication, if any) received by him on principal's account. He can, however, deduct all moneys due
to himself in respect of his remuneration or/and expenses properly incurred. If his acts are not
bonafide, he will lose his remuneration and will have to account for the secret profit to his
principal.
II. By operation of Law: Agency agreements may be terminated for reasons beyond the control
of either the principal or the agent. In such cases termination is said to result from operation of
law.
Death: With the exception of an agency coupled with an interest, the death of either party
terminates the agency immediately. Notice to a third party is not necessary, as the law
assumes notice to all at the time of death.
Illness: An agency relation is terminated if the Agent is too ill to perform his duties. Under
ordinary circumstances, the illness of the principal has no effect upon the operation or the
termination of the agency.
Insanity: The insanity of either the principal or the agent terminates the agency. If the
principal becomes insane, however, and the agent makes a valid agreement with a third party
who has no knowledge of the insanity, the contract will be allowed to stand. In this way,
insanity differs from death as a terminating factor.
Bankruptcy: the bankruptcy of either party terminates the agency. In case of bankruptcy of
the principal, the agency is terminated because title to the principal’s property is vested in a
trustee for the benefit of his creditors.
Impossibility of Performance: the destruction of the subject matter or the imprisonment of
the agent makes performance impossible. Therefore, the agent is terminated.
Example: Burke was hired by Data Processing Corporation to make a series of photographs of
a new computer which had been recently been completed for overseas shipment. Before
Burke could take the pictures, he was arrested as a suspect involving a capital crime. Failure
to secure bail resulted in Burke’s imprisonment. Impossibility of performance owing to Burke’s
imprisonment will terminate the agent agreement.
War: A contract of agency is inoperative in time of war if the agent or the principal is an
enemy alien.
Example: Data Processing Corporation engaged an electronic engineer who had entered the
United States as a displaced person from a European country. Hostilities broke out between
the United States and the country of which he was a citizen. Because the engineer was an
enemy alien and in a position to aid the enemy through work being done by his employer, he
is subject to dismissal. The revocation of the agency agreement by Data Processing cannot be
used by the engineer as a cause of action for breach of contract.