Histogram:

This graph shows me that out of all the data, the amount that is the most common is from 125000 135000 with a total percentage of
15 numbers being between that. From 135000 to 165000 there are at least 6% each.
Relative frequency histogram:
Again, this chart shows the frequency of how many numbers showing up. The very least numbers being in the 11000 to 12000 range
with the top being at 5.
 Pie/circle graph: This circle graph shows that the largest
percentage of the numbers was between 12,000 to 13,000 with the percent being 25.5%.
 Time series graph: Shows over time how the number
changes. It does go backwards, so it starts off at 2017 at the 0 mark to 1966 at the end. Over the years, the number seems to have
been slightly higher than before but the US overall population has also gone up.
 Boundaries Frequency Relative Frequency Cumulative Frequency

9500-10500 9 .18 12

10500-11500 3 .6 20

11500-12500 8 .16 28

12500-13500 15 .3 43

13500-14500 6 .12 49

14500-16500 6 .12 55

16500-17500 6 .12

Helps see the frequencies in one simple chart.

12808, 13253, 14509, 15540, 15801, 14659, 16073, 16134, 16286, 15451, 14068, 13324, 12827, 12896, 13041, 12866, 12133,
11733, 11587, 12280, 13467, 14113, 14463, 14665, 15289, 15727, 15294, 14341, 13431, 12590, 12455, 12843, 12876, 13010,
13420, 13911, 13647, 12505, 11543, 10377, 9931, 10288, 10273, 11104, 10156, 9642, 10284, 10551, 10440, 9691, 10954, 11656,
12389

My topic is number of impoverished children out of the total poverty population from 1966 to 2017. The information is from the United
States Census Bureau website . According to the website, poverty is defined by 48 possible thresholds, varied by family size and age
of members. Examples of the thresholds are below.
 ● Incomes of all related family members who are living together are added together to determine poverty status.
● Based off of anything from survivors benefits to dividends.
1. Stem and Leaf: For the stem and leaf, all of the numbers were mostly different so there was only a few similar ones. The “stem”
part spanned several scrolls down and was too much to be able to fit on one or two pages.

The charts show that while, the number has gone up and down over time, it seems to stay between 10000 to 15000 normally, but on
average it was 12500 to 13500. Because the numbers were all so large, and often not even similar, I found it hard to do certain graphs.