Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The rates of the N-demethylating reactions from (I) to (II) and from (II) to (III) were
much greater in barley shoots than in wheat shoots, especially in the second
demethylation.
It was concluded that the selective activity of (I) between barley and wheat plants
was mainly due to the difference in rates of N-demethylation of (I). In addition, it was
found that cotton plants, well known as tolerant to phenylurea herbicides, were
remarkably susceptible to (I). It was indicated that different rates of the
N-demethylating reaction between the phenyl and thiadiazolyl herbicides correlated
with susceptibility to them.
On the basis o f the work o f Kubo (1969) and Kubo et al. (1970), the authors have
newly synthesized 1,1-dimethyl-3-(5-tert-butyl- 1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)urea(l)
(Ishizuka et al. 1971), which shows the strongest herbicidal activity among the
thiadiazolylurea derivatives tested.
Actually however, the authors found that the chemical structure of (I), which was
reported by them to have amp of 80 to 82~ should be correctly 5-tert-butyl.3-N,N
dimethylcarbamoyl-2-N,N-dimethylcarbamoylimino-A4-1,3,4-thiadiazoline(V),
while the structure of (II) was confirmed to be correct. The physico-chemical proper-
ties of these compounds are shown in Table I.
, /CH3
N--r~ CH3 N--N--CON_ N~N
II 11 II / 5% KOH. MeOH CH311 rl
CH3 ~ " S ' ~ N H 2 ' "3CH~"S'%NCON'~r, u3 CH "~J"S'J~'NHCON~ CH3
CH3 (IV) ~ CH3 (V) "n 3 3 ~CH3 (I) CH3
CH3_N=C=O N~N
,,,gH3JJ ~, .,CH3
-- 9 ',..,n3"~ ~'S NHCON
CH3 (11) \H
Farbenfarbriken Bayer's groups (1969), the authors obtained only (V) as the final
reaction product under various conditions tested.
In order to obtain the real (I), the authors hydrolyzed (V) to (I) with 5% KOH in
methyl alcohol solution in consistently high yields. The scheme of the synthetic
method is shown in Figure 1. Other 1,l-dimethyl-3-(5-alkyl-substituted-l,3,4-
thiadiazol-2-yl)ureas were synthesized similarly by the alkali hydrolytic reaction.
0.8
(v)
= i" (v) ~ 1.2'- (.)
== (") o8-
"~ 0 " 2 - ~ X ~ x (I) u. 0.4 -
" - '= X ~ x (I)
I I I I 1 I I I
0 5 10 20 30 0 5 10 20 30
The growth of both species of plants was actually depressed by (I) more markedly
than by (II) and (V). From the results with a wide spectrum of plant species in
addition to wheat and barley, it was concluded that the herbicidal activity of (I) was
remarkably stronger than (II), which was evaluated by Kubo et al. (1970) as the
most promising herbicide.
1.4
A CH3
1.o
c
\ \ ----o-c.2c.2c.3
" 0.8-- X
v
0.6
t-
0.4
0.2
--CH 3 CH 3
I
I I I CH3
0 1000 2000 3000
Concentration (ppm)
Ten days after the treatment these plants, except barley, were completely with-
ered by both methods of application at 200 ppm of (I). Effects on the growth of
barley by shoot application of (I) were so strong that a refined selectivity between
barley and wheat plants was not obtained. Solutions of much lower concentrations
than used before were applied to roots for the purpose of obtaining a refined
selectivity. Most of the herbicides were used by application to roots. Development
o f new leaves was observed in barley seven days after treatment, although growth
was retarded.
A survey for selectivity between barley and wheat plants was made. Barley plant
was observed a little more tolerant for (I) than other species of plants tested. Twenty
ml each of solutions of 20, 40, 100, 200, 400, and 1000 ppm concentrations was
supplied to the soil surface of a culture-pot where five seedlings of barley or wheat
were grown. Growth expressed as fresh weight of the plants fourteen days after
treatment are shown in Figure 4. Growth of wheat plants was remarkably depressed
even by 20 ppm of (I), while growth of barley plants was depressed by concentra-
tions higher than 200 ppm of (I), while barley plants were not completely withered
even by 400 ppm. A difference in susceptibility toward (I) was found between
barley and wheat plants, especially in the treatments with rather low concentrations.
120
I I I I
0 20 40 100 200 400
Concentration (ppm)
The rate of absorption of (I) by barley roots (tolerant) was much more rapid than
by wheat roots (susceptible). It was not shown that a plant susceptible to (I)
absorbed (I) much more than a tolerant plant, and that the rate of the absorption was
one of the main factors which determined the susceptibility. Little difference in
translocation from roots to shoots of both species of plants was observed.
To examine the chemical transformation of (I) in plant tissues, plants were grown
in test tubes in solutions containing aSS-labeled (I) for two hr and 2, 4, 7 and 10
days. The plants, removed from the test tube, were cut to root and shoot parts after
the roots were washed with water. Each part of the plant tissues was extracted with
200 ml of 80% ethyl alcohol solution.
Absorption Translocation
Wheat Barley Wheat Barley
Exposure
Hrs dpm a %b dpm % dpm c %d dpm %
After concentration in vacuo, the fractions were thin-layer chromatographed and the
radioactivities on chromatography plates were measured. 35S-determination was
conducted by a liquid scintillation spectrometer (Beckman, LS-150). The metabo-
lites in acetone fraction were identified by mean of co-chromatography.
Percentages of 35S-labeled (I) and its metabolic products detected in shoots were
measured in time course. The root parts were exposed to 35S-labeled (I) solution
continuously during the application periods. Results are shown in Figure 5. (II),
(III), (IV), and three more unidentified compounds were found as metabolic pro-
ducts of (I) in both species of plants.
It was shown that (I) was metabolized in both species of plants to (II), which still
possessed a herbicidal activity, and furthermore to non-phytotoxic (III). But the rate
of the metabolic N-demethylating reaction from (I) to (II) was much greater in
barley shoots (tolerant) than in wheat shoots (susceptible).
100
8O
"0
6o B
v
v
"0
c
0
O.
E
o 4o
Er
"o
20 m
ol I I I I
2h 2 4 7 10
Exposure time (days)
It is concluded that the selective activity of (I) between barley and wheat plants is
mainly due to the remarkable difference in the rates of N-demethylation of (I) and
(II).
IO0
80
E 0
e~
20
[. I I I I
2h. 2 4 7 10
Rates of N-demethylation of (I) were examined in cotton and barley shoots under
the same conditions as mentioned before, sSS-radioactivities were found in several
metabolic products in shoots of barley plants. Within two hr, more than 70% of the
parent compound was transformed chemically. But in cotton plants it was mostly
detected in (I) and some in other metabolic products. The thiadiazolylurea herbicide
(I) was only slightly N-demethylated in cotton plants, while phenylurea herbicides
'4o r
DCMU
_~ 100 ................................
\
80 -- X Fluothiuron
60
x ~ x
--X,
40 - X
(I)
20 -
I . I I I I
0 20 40 100 200 400
Concentration (pprn)
Fig. 7. Effects of phenyl- and thiadiazolyl-urea herbicides on the growth of cotton plants.
164 I. N. Lee and K. Ishizuka
80
0
60- ~,~rley
"O
c
.-i
o 40--
E
8
~ 20--
E
0.
I I I .I
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Time (hr)
Fig. 8. Metabolism of 1,1-dimethyl-3-(5-tert-butyl- 1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) urea herbicide in
shoots of cotton and barley plants.
It was concluded that the great difference in the herbicidal activity of (I) and
DCMU on cotton plants was derived mainly from the difference in rates of
N-demethylation of both compounds. A substrate specificity o f N-demethylating
enzymes in cotton plants is to be investigated.
Acknowledgment
The authors owe much to Dr. T. Tatsuno and Dr. Y. Kubota, The Institute of
Physical and Chemical Research for this synthetic work.
References