Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ASSESSMENT IN LEARNING
ITEM DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS
DISEDIAKAN OLEH:
ANIS AMALINA BINTI MALEK (824693)
NUR IZZANA BT ABDUL SATAR (824717)
FATIMAH BINTI MOHD ZAINOL (824698)
NOOR HILALLIYA BT MOHAMAD KHALID (824709)
NAMA PENSYARAH:
DR. NURLIYANA BINTI BUKHARI
INTRODUCTION
by teachers to adjust their strategies and by students to adjust their learning strategies.
Assessment, teaching and learning are inextricably linked as each informs the others. Assessment
is a powerful process that can either optimize or inhibit learning, depending on how it’s applied.
In this course the first topic that we have learned is Assessment in Learning. So, we have
decided to choose this topic as our project. We want to measure how well student PGDE
understands about measurement, test, assessment and evaluation. These elements are important
to generate marks or grades which distinguish between students enable pass or fail decision to be
made. Besides, it is also providing evidence for other outside the course to enable them to judge
Test takers are students of PGDE enrolling SGDE4013 Assessment in Learning subject.
There are total of 30 test takers. The relevant instrument is using SGDE 4013 Assessment in
1 Measurement 4 1
2 Test 4 1
3 Assessment 4 1
4 Evaluation 3 2
Total 15 5
Learning Outcome
Table of specification
1 Measurement 1 3 1
2 Test 1 1
3 Assessment 1 6 1
4. Evaluation 1 2
1
Total 5
No. Construct Objective
1 Measurement
Meaning 1 4
Traits 1
Mental measurement 1
Pain tolerance measurement 1
2 Test 4
Meaning 1
Test vs measurement 1
Criterion -referenced test 1
Norm-referenced test 1
3 Assessment 4
Meaning 1
Characteristic Norm-Referenced Test 1
Formative Assessment
Authentic Assessment 1
1
4. Evaluation 3
Meaning 1
Relation of evaluation 1
Formative evaluation 1
TOTAL 7 6 2 15
ITEM DEVELOPMENT
4. A researcher is measuring a pain tolerance by having an individual walks across a beach of hot
sand. Identify the reaction with the BEST scoring.
Reaction Scoring
5. What is a test?
a) An instrument or systematic procedure for observing and describing one or more
characteristics of a student.
b) A process for assigning number.
c) A procedure for assigning number of characteristic value to the quantity of entity item.
9. What is an assessment?
a) Any systematic method of obtaining information, used to draw inferences about
characteristics of people, objects or programs.
b) The process of assigning numbers.
c) The process of making a value judgment about the worth of an entity’s performance or
product.
10.
· Score are given as a rank based on other student scores.
· Assesses a very large number of students.
· Test usually takes a longer period number of times.
11. Five minutes before end of the period for subject English Language, Madam Liyana does
some revision for the topic that her student learned today.
Based on the situation above, what type of assessment that used by madam Liyana ?
a) Formative Assessment
b) Summative Assessment
c) Criterion Referenced Test
13. Process of making a value judgment and to determine of significances is the main purpose
of?
a) Measurement
b) Summative Evaluation
c) Evaluation
14. Do you think the program of School Based Assessment is related with the process to
determine the extent to which an action was successful?
a) No.
b) Yes.
c) Unsure.
15. Formative evaluation is used after the course completion to assign the grades. Which one of
the following answers is the TRUE statement?
a) No: Formative is used to know what the instructional objective has been achieve.
b) Yes: Formative also helps to provide feedback to the teacher.
c) Unsure.
SECTION B (15 Marks)
Answer all questions.
1. By using the example of pain tolerance as a trait, complete table below by determine the 3
painful levels and scream level that can be used to measure pain tolerance. (3 marks)
3. What are differences between formative assessment and summative assessment? (6 marks)
END
Marking scheme/ scoring rubric
Objective
- Each right answer entitle for one mark.
Reaction Scoring
a) Cry Moving away from the ( Unable to determine different pain level )
sand
c) Scream Moving away from the ( Unable to determine different pain level )
sand
d) Scream The louder, the painful ( Best to describe different pain level
and represent pain )
5. A What is a test?
a) An instrument or systematic procedure for observing and describing one or
more characteristics of a student.
b) A process for assigning number. (Measurement)
c) A procedure for assigning number of characteristic value to the quantity of entity
item. (Measurement)
9. A 9. What is an assessment?
a) Any systematic method of obtaining information, used to draw inferences
about characteristics of people, objects or programs.
b) The process of assigning numbers. ( Measurement )
c) The process of making a value judgment about the worth of an entity’s
performance or product. ( Evaluation )
10. B · Score are given as a rank based on other student scores.
· Assesses a very large number of students.
· Test usually takes a longer period number of times.
Based on statement above, this assessment refer to
11. A Five minutes before end of the period for subject English Language, Madam Liyana
does some revision for the topic that her student learned today.
Based on the situation above, what type of assessment that used by madam Liyana ?
13. C Process of making a value judgment and to determine of significances is the main
purpose of?
a) Measurement ( Process of assigning number)
b) Summative Evaluation (evaluate at the end of semester)
c) Evaluation
14. B Do you think the program of School Based Assessment is related with the process to
determine the extent to which an action was successful?
a) No
b) Yes
c)Unsure
15. A Formative evaluation is used after the course completion to assign the grades . Which
one the true statement?
a) No : Formative are used to know what the instructional objective has been
achieve
b) Yes: Formative also help to provide feedback to the teacher.
c) Unsure
Subjective
1. By using the example of pain tolerance as a trait, complete table below by determine the 3m
3 painful levels and scream level that can be used to measure pain tolerance. (3 marks)
Measurement Evaluation
Measurement Evaluation
2m
To summarize the traits of entity To make judgement about the entity of student
TOTAL 15m
TEST ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES
The test was given to PGDE students. They are a total of fifteen objective questions and
five subjective questions that covers about the first topic of Assessment in Learning such as
The test was held on 4th December 2018. 9.00 a.m until 10:00 a.m. The test took place at
SEML class. The condition of the venue was semi-formal, where examinee took the test at their
own place and it was a paper based test. All examinee need to submit their answers after one
hour of test.
During the test, the subject or issues that occur is that students may imitate a friend on the
side as all students only answer the test at their respective places. Then it is easy for them to
Upon conducting the test, all participants need further explanation to understand the
questions need and they regularly asked for the definition of certain words. Besides, all the test
takers are not well prepared to answer the question as they are mostly exhausted after attending
their morning class. On the other hand, the questions are prepared by inexperienced creator and
are unable to focus on developing the items due to time constraint which the time allocated to
Besides, there are also some issues during the analysis process using SPSS which one of
the most problematic issue is that the members of the group are mostly not familiar with SPSS
itself. It makes them unable to determine or understand the usage of the SPSS and cannot make
full use of it and are unable to utilise the data due to lack of knowledge and exposure to the
SPSS.
Last but not least important, majority of the students are not mastered in the subject but
they search the correct answers throughout the websites such as google websites.That is the
reason that it gives some impact to the reliability. In other way, the test makers are lack of
experience in construct the items are also affected the item’s reliability. As an example, some
subjectives questions are need to define what the differences between evaluations and
measurements, but the students are disabilities to understand what purpose of the questions and
Results
1. 2 12 14
2. 9 5 14
3. 8 6 14
4. 7 7 14
5. 11 4.5 15.5
6. 3 13 16
7. 3 13 16
8. 3 13 16
9. 8 12 20
10. 8 13 21
11. 10 11 21
12. 8 13 21
13. 6 15 21
14. 9 12 21
15. 11 11 22
16. 11 11 22
17. 7 15 22
18. 7 15 22
19. 8 15 23
20. 10 14 24
21. 9 15 24
22. 11 13 24
23. 11 14 25
24. 10 15 25
25. 11 15 26
26. 11 15 26
27. 11 15 26
28. 13 14 27
29. 14 13 27
30. 13 15 28
ITEM ANALYSES
Scale SD 4.407575767
N 30
Table 1: Reliability indexed for each construct and cronbach alpha of SAS
Item Reliability
The purpose of this study is to know the extent of the students' understanding in the subject that
had learned throughout in PGDE studies in Semester 1.The students’ population are 35 students
consisting of 6 men and 29 women. 30 student or respondent are randomly selected to answer
the questions that was provided to them.The instrument that were used are questionnaires’
includes objective forms and subjective (fill in the blank) . The application to analysis the data
that was used are Statiscal Package for Social Science version 22.0 .Statistic descriptive are
Item reliability is the consistency of a set of items (variables) that is to what extent they measure
the same thing. When set of items are consistent, they can make a measurement scale such as
sum scale.Cronbach’s alpha is the most popular measure of item reliability, it is the average
correlation of items in a measurement scale. If the items have variances that significantly differ,
The table above shows that the cronbach alpha for the overall items are 0.627. The MEAN of the
overall items are (m = 21.25 , st deviation = 4.41). The level of understanding that being
measured by this study consist of four main construct which is measurement, item, assessment
and evaluation.Difficulty and discrimination indexed items are used to evaluate the test items.
Those tables are showed the reliability indexed for each construct and cronbach alpha of SAS .
Item Difficulty
The item difficulty index is one of the most useful, and most frequently reported, item analysis
statistics. It is a measure of the proportion of examinees who answered the item correctly; for
this reason it is frequently called the p-value. As the proportion of examinees who got the item
right, the p-value might more properly be called the item easiness index, rather than the item
difficult can range between 0.0 and 1.0, with a higher value indicating that a greater proportion
of examinees responded to the item correctly, and it was thus an easier item. Based on the table,
the result shows there are two items difficult includes item 9 and item 12. If the index nearly to 1
, that means the item is easy and if the item is difficult , the item nearly to zero.
To increase the value of cronbach alpha, some items should be removed to make it positive
results. The negative items are item 3, item 12, and item 16.
between high group and low group. The index is extended to show the differences between the
high score and low scores. The students with high scores usually got a item correct and however,
there are also can be answered by others group. This table shows the index discrimination.
ID < 0 Negative discrimination which is lower group is better than high group.
For this analysis, there are 15 questions of objectives were be measured in this study which
consist 4 stages such as high positive discrimination , moderate positive discrimination , low
positive discrimination and negative discrimination which is lower group is better that high
group .For the stage of high positive discriminations , there are consists 5 items are very good
items and too discrimination. The 5 items in higher positive discriminations are items ( 1, 2, 4,
discrimination consists 8 items such as item (5, 8, 10, 15, 17, 18, 19, and 20). These items are
good and can be improved .The percentage of moderates positive discriminations are 40%. The
items which includes in low positive discrimination are item 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13 and the
percentages of low positive discrimination are 25% which this items are weak and need to be
checked again. The index discrimination are also shows the negative discrimination which is
lower group is better than high group are includes items (3, 12, and 16) . The percentages of this
stage are 15% that means the items are couldn’t use in this analysis.
Low 5 25%
Moderate 8 40%
High 4 20%
Negative 3 15%
Total 20 100
According the results, we can conclude that if the items discrimination (DI) index are near to
zero, that means the items are not good and couldn’t be used as a question.
DISCUSSION
The reliability index for this study was 0.627 which is good. We cannot expect assessment
results to be perfectly consistent. There are numerous factors other than the quality being
Among the factors that can affect the reliability of the item is range of ability.
Respondent in this study had the heterogeneous ability and had caused this reliability to be good.
Item difficulty level also affects index of reliability. Reliability will be low if a test is so easy or
so difficult that every student get most or all of the items wrong or correct.
After that, distractor of the answer are strong and most student less guessing the answer
Based on the discrimination item (DI) and difficulty item (DI), there are relation between
discrimination and difficulty. Difficulty is still useful for flagging items, though an item flagged
for being too easy or too hard will often have a low discrimination, it may be worth reviewing
and other factors that may have impacted the statistics. Sometimes easy and hard items are useful
for measurement . For item difficulty , some items should be removed from question due to some
distractors .
The first negative item is item 3 which the distractors maybe the answer that was given
confusing the respondents.The items seems like same meaning and purpose. Then it also about
the question are not clear and couldn’t make the respondent are understand with simple
ways.Beside that, the background of respondent are the one factor of distractor that will give
impact to the difficulty items. In the same time,there are two negative items such as objective are
not working at all.Its seems like the test- maker give a slight clue in the length item 12 and item
16. Then , we found out that the distractors of question number 12 in of the distractors.The others
factor that impact item difficulty is perhaps due to to period of time and the respondents are not
mastered in the outcomes learning. The brief formula of difficulty are if the index are nearly to 1
, that means the question or item is easy and all the respondent can give the answer in the easy
ways.
Subsequently, discrimination are also has relations meaning with difficulty items. If item
difficulty index nearly to 1 means easy , then in discrimination index ,if the index nearly to 1 ,
that means the item is high positive discrimination. The 3 items in negative discriminations are
items ( 3,12,16 ) . When an item is discrimination negatively, overall of the student are not
completely mastered in the topic which is learned. Item have negative discrimination, educators
Generally, the result of the test on the students of PGDE Universiti Utara Malaysia ,
shows the mean of the overall items are good .Mostly questions which are answered by the
student are correct and just 20% items are negative and should be removed. The test that are
given to PGDE student consist of fifteen objective questions and five subjective questions that
covers about the first topic of Assessment in Learning such as measurement, item, assessment
and evaluation. The results are reliable because of some students are mastered and others are not
mastered in this subject. Statistics discriminations shows 40% of the discrimination index are in
moderate stage.
Besides, there are some issues upon completing this task which are during the beginning which
concerns about the item development, upon conducting the test which concerns on the
difficulties faced by the test takers mostly in understanding the item’s needs and also some issues
during the analysis process using SPSS which one of the most problematic issue is that the
members of the group are mostly not familiar with SPSS itself.
Based on the results and overall discussion, the researchers give some suggestions in
improving this task. Hence, there are some suggestion in improving this task which concerns on
the time allocation. It should be longer and must be assigned early in the semester, not at the end
of it. In addition, we must also take into consideration on the readiness of the test takers to
answer the questions. . And then, it is a must for the item creator to have experience and
expertise or at least guidance from the experts in this field to make the result of the test valid. In
addition of that, the reliability results also are shows good due to earlier information to test taker
Scott A. , Sarah M. , Jason K. & John R. (2013). Item Development and Assessment
Construction Guidelines for Common Core State Standards. United States of America:
National Center for Educational Statistics (2007). NAEP Item Development Process. Retrieved
[Ross Avlin] (2016). How to analyze data in SPSS [Video File] Retrieve from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6Gs24iK8bM
http://sites.psu.edu/itemanalysis/discrimination
[Liyana Bukhari]. (2018, Mar 21). Demonstrasi Kemasukan Data Dalam SPSS [Video File]
Descriptive Statistics
Std.
N Minimum Maximum Mean Deviation
i1 30 0.0 1.0 .800 .4068
i2 30 0.0 1.0 .800 .4068
i3 30 0.0 1.0 .500 .5085
i4 30 0.0 1.0 .733 .4498
i5 30 0.0 1.0 .600 .4983
i6 30 0.0 1.0 .800 .4068
i7 30 0.0 1.0 .467 .5074
i8 30 0.0 1.0 .667 .4795
i9 30 0.0 1.0 .400 .4983
i10 30 0.0 1.0 .433 .5040
i11 30 0.0 1.0 .433 .5040
i12 30 0.0 1.0 .400 .4983
i13 30 0.0 1.0 .567 .5040
i14 30 0.0 1.0 .733 .4498
i15 30 0.0 1.0 .433 .5040
i16 30 0.0 3.0 2.550 .8131
i17 30 0.0 2.0 1.200 .9965
i18 30 2.0 6.0 5.433 1.3817
i19 30 0.0 2.0 1.667 .6609
i20 30 0.0 2.0 1.633 .6687
Valid N
(listwise) 30
Statistics
SAS_Score
N Valid 30
Missing 0
SAS_Score
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 14.00 4 13.3 13.3 13.3
15.50 1 3.3 3.3 16.7
16.00 3 10.0 10.0 26.7
20.00 1 3.3 3.3 30.0
21.00 5 16.7 16.7 46.7
22.00 4 13.3 13.3 60.0
23.00 1 3.3 3.3 63.3
24.00 3 10.0 10.0 73.3
25.00 2 6.7 6.7 80.0
26.00 3 10.0 10.0 90.0
27.00 2 6.7 6.7 96.7
28.00 1 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach'
s Alpha N of Items
.627 20
Item Statistics
Std.
Mean Deviation N
i1 .800 .4068 30
i2 .800 .4068 30
i3 .500 .5085 30
i4 .733 .4498 30
i5 .600 .4983 30
i6 .800 .4068 30
i7 .467 .5074 30
i8 .667 .4795 30
i9 .400 .4983 30
i10 .433 .5040 30
i11 .433 .5040 30
i12 .400 .4983 30
i13 .567 .5040 30
i14 .733 .4498 30
i15 .433 .5040 30
i16 2.550 .8131 30
i17 1.200 .9965 30
i18 5.433 1.3817 30
i19 1.667 .6609 30
i20 1.633 .6687 30
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Statistics
Std.
Mean Variance Deviation N of Items
21.250 19.427 4.4076 20
PELAJAR i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 i12 i13 i14 i15 i16 i17 i18 i19 i20 MARKAH_OBJ MARKAH_SUB MARKAH_PENUH SAS_Score SAS_Score_Xslx
P027 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 14.0 14.00 14.0
Yi ) P028 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 9.0 5.0 14.0 14.00 14.0
Y P029 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 8.0 6.0 14.0 14.00 14.0
)
P030 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 14.00 14.0
P026 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 4.5 15.5 15.50 15.5
P023 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 13.0 16.0 16.00 16.0
P024 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 13.0 16.0 16.00 16.0
P025 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 13.0 16.0 16.00 16.0
P022 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 8.0 12.0 20.0 20.00 20.0
P017 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 13.0 21.0 21.00 21.0
P018 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 11.0 21.0 21.00 21.0
P019 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 13.0 21.0 21.00 21.0
P020 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 15.0 21.0 21.00 21.0
P021 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 9.0 12.0 21.0 21.00 21.0
P013 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 11.0 11.0 22.0 22.00 22.0
P014 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 11.0 11.0 22.0 22.00 22.0
P015 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 15.0 22.0 22.00 22.0
P016 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 15.0 22.0 22.00 22.0
P012 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 15.0 23.0 23.00 23.0
P009 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 14.0 24.0 24.00 24.0
P010 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 9.0 15.0 24.0 24.00 24.0
P011 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 11.0 13.0 24.0 24.00 24.0
P007 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 14.0 25.0 25.00 25.0
P008 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 15.0 25.0 25.00 25.0
P003 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 15.0 26.0 26.00 26.0
P004 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 15.0 26.0 26.00 26.0
P005 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 15.0 26.0 26.00 26.0
P002 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 13.0 14.0 27.0 27.00 27.0
P006 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 14.0 13.0 27.0 27.00 27.0
P001 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 13.0 15.0 28.0 28.00 28.0
mean 0.800 0.800 0.500 0.733 0.600 0.800 0.467 0.667 0.400 0.433 0.433 0.400 0.567 0.733 0.433 2.550 1.200 5.433 1.667 1.633 21.25
SD 0.406838 0.406838 0.508548 0.449776 0.498273 0.406838 0.507416 0.479463 0.498273 0.504007 0.504007 0.498273 0.504007 0.449776 0.504007 0.813146 0.996546 1.381736 0.660895 0.668675 4.407575767
var 0.165517 0.165517 0.258621 0.202299 0.248276 0.165517 0.257471 0.229885 0.248276 0.254023 0.254023 0.248276 0.254023 0.202299 0.254023 0.661207 0.993103 1.909195 0.436782 0.447126 19.42672414
cov(item-total) 1.051724 1.293103 -0.06034 1.275862 0.741379 0.5 0.568966 1.017241 0.431034 1.043103 0.387931 -1.08621 0.491379 1.310345 0.784483 -0.51293 3.137931 3.801724 1.844828 1.405172
cor(item-total) 0.586517 0.721127 -0.02692 0.643587 0.337577 0.278836 0.254403 0.481359 0.196266 0.46956 0.17463 -0.49459 0.221198 0.660981 0.35314 -0.14312 0.714408 0.624246 0.633321 0.476776
cronbach's alpha 0.626986