Rubric for the Budget Allocation Table

CRITERIA NEEDS FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

IMPROVEMENT (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
(1 point)
Accuracy Most of the entries in the Some of the entries in the One or two entries in All of the entries in the
budget allocation table budget allocation table the budget allocation budget allocation table
are not accurate. are not accurate. table are not accurate. are accurate and
complete.
Computation Computations are not Computations are Computations are All computations are
shown. incomplete and accurate but some parts present, complete, and
inaccurate. are missing. accurate.
Neatness The table is not neat at The table is a little neat. The table is neat and The table is complete,
all. There are many There are some presentable. However, neat, and presentable.
unnecessary marks. unnecessary marks. there is one or two There are no unnecessary
unnecessary marks. marks.

Rubric for the Budget Proposal

CRITERIA POOR FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Content The proposal presents The proposal presents limited The proposal presents relevant The proposal presents
incomplete and irrelevant information. information, but it lacks some complete and relevant
information. supporting details information. The information
are supported by facts.
Computation There is no computation shown There are at least two There is at least one All computations are present,
in the proposal. computations that are missing computation that is missing or complete, and accurate.
or in accurate. in accurate.
Organization The proposal is hard to The proposal lacks The proposal is clearly The proposal is clearly
understand. It is very organization. It has two or presented, but it has at least presented and very organized.
disorganized. more incoherent statements. one incoherent statement.
Rubric for the Miniature Model Design

CRITERIA POOR FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point)
Understanding of the The miniature model design
Mathematical addresses none of the
Components mathematical components
presented in the task.
Planning and The miniature model design
Execution does not use any basic
geometric figures.
Correctness of the All the solutions for the
Solutions surface areas and volumes of
the solid figures are
incorrect.
Neatness The miniature model design
is not neat at all. There are
many unnecessary marks.
(2 points)
The miniature model design
addresses some of the
mathematical components
presented in the task.
The miniature model design
shows a limited use of basic
geometric figures.
Some of the solutions for the
surface areas and volumes of
the solid figures are correct.
The miniature model design
is somewhat neat. There are
many unnecessary marks.
(3 points)
The miniature model design
addresses almost all of the
mathematical components
presented in the task.
The miniature model design
shows an appropriate use of
basic geometric figures.
Most of the solutions for the
surface areas and volumes of
the solid figures are correct.
The miniature model design
is acceptably neat.
(4 points)
The miniature model design
completely addresses all
mathematical components
presented in the task.
The miniature model design
shows an appropriate and
effective use of basic
geometric figures.
All the solutions for the
surface areas and volumes of
the solid figures are correct.
The miniature model design
is very neat. There are no
unnecessary marks.

Rubric for the Survey

CRITERIA POOR FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point)
Execution The task is not completed.
Presentation/ The output has many unclear
Organization and inappropriate survey
of Data questions. There is no table or
other graphic organizer.
Correctness All the solutions for the
of Solutions measures of central tendency
are incorrect.
Neatness The output is not neat at all.
There are many unnecessary
marks.
(2 points)
The task is almost completed.
The output has some unclear
and inappropriate survey
questions. A table/graphic
organizer is used to present
data but data are incomplete.
Some of the solutions for the
measures of central tendency
are correct.
The output is somewhat neat.
There are some unnecessary
marks.
(3 points)
The task is completed but with
minor errors.
The output has clear survey
questions but a few are
inappropriate. A table/graphic
organizer is used to present
complete data.
Most of the solutions for the
measures of central tendency
are correct.
The output is acceptably neat.
(4 points)
The task is completed with no
errors.
The output has clear and
appropriate survey questions. It
also has a table/graphic
organizer to present complete
data.
All the solutions for the
measures of central tendency
are correct.
The output is very neat. There
are no unnecessary marks.
Rubric for the Philippine Bills and Coins Album

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point)
Project Display The album is creative but not The album is creative and
neat.
Effective and Efficient The oral presentation is not
Oral Presentation organized.
Application of The pupil showed only a
Mathematical minimal understanding of
Concepts mathematical concepts
through the project output.
(2 points)
attractive.
The oral presentation is
organized but some points
are not clear.
The pupil showed a basic
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
(3 points)
The album is organized,
creative and attractive.
The oral presentation is
organized, concise, and well
rehearsed.
The pupil showed a good
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
(4 points)
The album is neat,
organized, creative, and
attractive.
The oral presentation is very
organized, concise and well
rehearsed.
The pupil showed a very
good and clear
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.

Rubric for the Hand Puppets

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point)
Project Display The hand puppets are
creative but not neatly
done.
Effective and Efficient Oral The oral presentation about
Presentation the hand puppets is not
organized.
Application of The pupil showed only a
Mathematical Concepts minimal understanding of
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
(2 points)
The hand puppets are
somewhat creative but not
attractive.
The oral presentation about
hand puppets is organized
but some points are not
clear.
The pupil showed a basic
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
(3 points) (4 points)
The hand puppets are The hand puppets are very
creative and attractive. creative and attractive.
The oral presentation about The oral presentation about
hand puppets is organized, hand puppets is very
concise, and well rehearsed. organized, concise and well
rehearsed.
The pupil showed a good The pupil showed a very
understanding of the good and clear
mathematical concepts understanding of the
through the project output. mathematical concepts
through the project output.
Rubric for the Artwork
CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(1 point)
Project Display The artwork is creative but
not neatly done.
Effective and Efficient Oral The oral presentation about
Presentation the artwork is not
organized.
Application of The pupil showed only a
Mathematical Concepts minimal understanding of
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
Rubric for the Picture Book
CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(1 point)
Project Display The picture book is creative
but not neatly done.
Effective and Efficient Oral The oral presentation about
Presentation the picture book is not
organized.
Application of The pupil showed only a
Mathematical Concepts minimal understanding of
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
FAIR
(2 points)
The artwork is somewhat
creative but not attractive.
The oral presentation about
the artwork is organized but
some points are not clear.
The pupil showed a basic
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
FAIR
(2 points)
The picture book is
somewhat creative but not
attractive.
The oral presentation about
the picture book is
organized but some points
are not clear.
The pupil showed a basic
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
GOOD
(3 points)
The artwork is creative and
attractive.
The oral presentation about
the artwork is organized,
concise, and well rehearsed.
The pupil showed a good
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
GOOD
(3 points)
The picture book is creative
and attractive.
The oral presentation about
the picture book is
organized, concise, and
well rehearsed.
The pupil showed a good
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
VERY GOOD
(4 points)
The artwork is very creative
and attractive.
The oral presentation about
the artwork is very
organized, concise and well
rehearsed.
The pupil showed a very
good and clear
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
VERY GOOD
(4 points)
The picture book is very
creative and attractive.
The oral presentation about
the picture book is very
organized, concise and well
rehearsed.
The pupil showed a very
good and clear
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
Rubric for the Pet Survey

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR EXCELLENT

Understanding of the
Problem/Use of the Visual
Tools
Presentation
Accuracy of Computation
(1 point)
Shows a little understanding of the
problem; No pictures/drawings are
used to help solve the problem
The presentation is not organized.
The computation demonstrates a
little understanding of the
relationship of the numbers. A
correct answer is not included.
(3 points)
Shows a good understanding of the
problem; Some pictures/ drawings
are used to help solve the problem
The presentation is organized.
The computation demonstrates a
good understanding of the
relationship of the numbers. An
accurate answer is included.
(5 points)
Shows a complete understanding of
the problem; Many pictures/
drawings are used to help solve the
problem
The presentation is very organized.
The computation demonstrates a
good understanding of the
relationship of the numbers and
exhibits a good problem-solving
strategy. An accurate answer is
included.

Rubric for the Record on the Spaghetti Ingredients

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point)
Presentation The record is difficult to
understand.
Application of The completed record
Mathematical Concepts shows a minimal
understanding of
mathematical concepts.
Correctness of Answers Only one to three items are
correctly answered.
(2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
The record is somewhat The record is organized, but The record is very
organized. it can still be improved. organized and easy to
understand.
The completed record The completed record The completed record
shows a basic shows a good shows a very good and
understanding of the understanding of the clear understanding of the
mathematical concepts. mathematical concepts. mathematical concepts.
Four to six items are Seven to nine items are All items are correctly
correctly answered. correctly answered. answered.
Rubric for the Stage Design

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

Plan for the Stage Design
Creativity
Use of Technology
(1 point)
The plan does not follow
the theme. Most of the
geometric figures are
incorrect.
The plan has a boring
design. It does not make
use of the geometric shapes
creatively.
The plan is made using
MSWord or MSPaint with
the teacher’s assistance all
throughout.
(2 points)
The plan follows the theme
but needs a lot of
improvement. Some of the
geometric figures are
incorrect.
The plan has a simple
design. The geometric
shapes are randomly set up
in the design.
The plan is made using
MSWord or MSPaint with
the teacher’s assistance
most of the time.
(3 points) (4 points)
The plan follows the theme The plan follows the theme.
but needs a minor All of the geometric figures
improvement. Only a few are correct.
of the geometric figures are
incorrect.
The plan has a good design. The plan has a unique and
The geometric shapes are interesting design. The
strategically set up in the geometric shapes are
design. strategically and creatively
set up in the design.
The plan is made using The plan is made using the
MSWord or MSPaint with MSWord or MSPaint
the minimal assistance from independently.
the teacher.

Rubric for the Pictograph and Vertical Bar Graph

CRITERIA POOR FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Graph Titles Both graphs have poor titles or One graph has a good title, Both graphs have good titles Both graphs have appropriate
no titles at all. while the other has a poor title. but they can be improved. and meaningful titles.
Graph There are no labels on both Only one graph has proper Both graphs have proper labels. Both graphs have complete and
Labels graphs. labels. However, there are at least two proper labels.
missing labels for both graphs.
Pictograph There is no legend at the There is a legend at the bottom There is a legend at the bottom There is a clear and appropriate
Legend bottom of the pictograph. of the pictograph, but it is of the pictograph, but it can legend at the bottom of the
incorrect. still be improved. pictograph.
Overall Both graphs are unfinished and Only one graph is finished and Both graphs are finished and Both graphs are finished,
Presentation not presentable. presented. presented but the graphs can presentable, and correct.
still be improved.
Rubric for the Recycling Write-up

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Organization The write-up is not The write-up is complete The write-up is complete The write-up is complete
organized and incomplete. but is not organized. and organized. and very organized.
Application of The grouped showed a The group showed a basic The group showed a good The group showed a very
Mathematical Concepts minimal understanding of understanding of the understanding of the good and clear
mathematical concepts mathematical concepts mathematical concepts understanding of the
through the write-up. through the write-up. through the write-up. mathematical concepts
through the write-up.
Solution and Correctness of The solutions and answers The solutions and answers The solutions and answers The solutions and answers
Answers are incorrect. of some items are correct. of most items are correct. of all items are correct.

Rubric for the Scrapbook

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Creativity The scrapbook has a boring The scrapbook has a simple The scrapbook has a good The scrapbook has a unique
layout. It shows no layout. It shows a little layout. It shows creativity. and interesting design. It is
creativity. creativity. very creative.
Organization The write-up is not The write-up is complete The write-up is complete The write-up is complete
organized and incomplete. but is not organized. and organized. and very organized.
Accuracy of Solutions The solutions and answers The solutions and answers The solutions and answers The solutions and answers
are incorrect. of some items are correct. of most items are correct. of all items are correct.
Rubric for the PowerPoint or Video Presentation on a Cook Fest

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point)
Organization The PowerPoint or video
presentation is difficult to
understand. It is not
organized.
Application of The pupil showed a
Mathematical Concepts minimal understanding of
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
Accuracy of Computation The computation
demonstrates a little
understanding of the
relationship of the numbers.
A correct answer is not
included.
(2 points)
The PowerPoint or video
presentation is somewhat
organized.
The pupil showed a basic
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
The computation
demonstrates a good
understanding of the
relationship of the numbers.
An accurate answer is
included.
(3 points)
The PowerPoint or video
presentation is organized,
but it can still be improved.
The pupil showed a good
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
The computation
demonstrates a good
understanding of the
relationship of the numbers
and exhibits a good
problem-solving strategy.
An accurate answer is
included.
(4 points)
The PowerPoint or video
presentation is very
organized and easy to
understand.
The pupil showed a very
good and clear
understanding of the
mathematical concepts
through the project output.
The computation
demonstrates a very good
understanding of the
relationship of the numbers
and exhibits an excellent
problem-solving strategy.
An accurate answer is
included.

Rubric for the Graph on Children’s Helpful Practices

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Application of The pupils showed only a The pupils showed a basic The pupils showed a good The pupils showed a very
Mathematical minimal understanding of understanding of the understanding of the good and clear understanding
Concepts mathematical concepts mathematical concepts mathematical concepts of the mathematical concepts
through the PowerPoint through the PowerPoint through the PowerPoint through the PowerPoint
presentation. presentation. presentation. presentation.
Graph Titles and The graphs have not title and The graphs have a poor title The graphs have good titles The graphs have appropriate
Labels incorrect labels. and labels. and proper labels but they can and meaningful titles and
be improved. complete and proper labels.
Overall The PowerPoint presentation The PowerPoint presentation The PowerPoint presentation The PowerPoint presentation
Presentation is incomplete and not is somewhat complete and is complete but the presented is complete, creative, and
presentable. presentable. graphs can still be improved. organized.
Rubric for the Proposal

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Content The proposal has incomplete The proposal has limited The proposal has relevant The proposal has correct,
information. information presented. information but lacks a few relevant, and realistic
supporting details. information.
Computation There is no computation Two computations are missing One computation is missing or All computations are present,
included in the proposal. or inaccurate. inaccurate. complete, and accurate.
Presentation The proposal is difficult to The proposal needs to The proposal needs to The proposal is complete,
understand. improve on at least two of the improve on at least one of the neat, and organized.
following: completeness, following: completeness,
neatness, and organization. neatness, and organization.

Rubric for the Report

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Content The report has incomplete The report has limited The report has relevant The report has correct,
information. information presented. information but lacks a few relevant, and realistic
supporting details. information.
Computation There is no computation There are at least two missing There is at least one missing All computations are present,
included in the report. or inaccurate computations. or inaccurate computation. complete, and accurate.
Presentation The report is difficult to The report needs to improve The report needs to improve The report is complete, neat,
understand. on at least two of the on at least one of the and organized.
following: completeness, following: completeness,
neatness, and organization. neatness, and organization.
Rubric for the Inventory Report
CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(1 point)
Content The inventory report has
incomplete information.
Computation There is no computation
included in the inventory
report.
Presentation The inventory report is
difficult to understand.
Rubric for the Report about Graphs
CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(1 point)
Content The report has incomplete
information. Both the data and information presented. Either
the bar/line graph are missing. the data or the bar/line graph
Computation There is no computation
included in the report.
Presentation The report is difficult to
understand.
FAIR
(2 points)
The inventory report has
limited information presented.
There are at least two missing
or inaccurate computations.
The inventory report needs to
improve on at least two of the
following: completeness,
neatness, and organization.
FAIR
(2 points)
The report has limited
is missing or has an error.
There are at least two missing
or inaccurate computations.
The report needs to improve
on at least two of the
following: completeness,
neatness, and organization.
GOOD
(3 points)
The inventory report has
relevant information but lacks
a few supporting details.
There is at least one missing
or inaccurate computation.
The inventory report needs to
improve on at least one of the
following: completeness,
neatness, and organization.
GOOD
(3 points)
The report has relevant
information but lacks a few
supporting details. The data
and the bar/line graph are
present but they have an error.
There is at least one missing
or inaccurate computation.
The report needs to improve
on at least one of the
following: completeness,
neatness, and organization.
VERY GOOD
(4 points)
The inventory report has
correct, relevant, and realistic
information.
All computations are present,
complete, and accurate.
The inventory report is
complete, neat, and organized.
VERY GOOD
(4 points)
The report has complete
information. The data and the
bar/line graph are present and
correct.
All computations are present,
complete, and accurate.
The report is complete, neat,
and organized.
Rubric for the PowerPoint Presentation

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Interpretation The tables and graphs were The tables and graphs were The tables and graphs were The tables and graphs were
and Creation of interpreted with the teacher’s interpreted by the pupils interpreted by the pupils interpreted by the pupils
Graphs assistance. independently. independently. They used independently. They used
MSWord or MSExcel with the MSWord or MSExcel without
teacher’s assistance. the help of the teacher.
Analysis of Data Most of the predictions based Some of the predictions based The predictions based on the The predictions based on the
from Tables and on the tables and graphs were on the tables and graphs were tables and graphs were tables and graphs were
Graphs incorrect. incorrect. correct, but made with the correct, and were
teacher’s assistance. independently made by the
pupils.
Organization of The PowerPoint presentation The PowerPoint presentation The PowerPoint presentation The PowerPoint presentation
the PowerPoint was disorganized. There was a was organized but done with was organized and was very organized and
Presentation deviation from the specified the teacher’s assistance. It independently done. It independently done. It
contents (i.e., bar graph, table, followed specified contents followed specified contents followed specified contents
pictures, etc.). (i.e., bar graph, table, pictures, (i.e., bar graph, table, pictures, (i.e., bar graph, table, pictures,
etc.). etc.). It also had custom etc.). It also had custom
animations in slides. animations in each slide.
Observation of The presentation lasted three The presentation lasted two The presentation lasted one The presentation lasted within
Time Allotment or more minutes beyond the minutes beyond the allotted minute beyond the allotted the allotted time of 10
for the allotted time. time. time. minutes.
Presentation
Delivery of the The presenters displayed no The presenters displayed a The presenters displayed eye The presenters displayed
Presentation eye contact and focus, little eye contact, and had fast contact and clear articulation exceptional confidence
enthusiasm, and confidence. speaking rate, with little of ideas, but they lacked through poise, clear
modulation. enthusiasm. articulation of ideas, eye
contact, and enthusiasm.
Rubric for the Inventory Report Table

CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT FAIR GOOD VERY GOOD

(1 point) (2 points) (3 points) (4 points)
Format The inventory report table was The inventory report table was The inventory report table was The inventory report table was
created using MSWord or mostly created using MSWord created using MSWord or created using MSWord or
Excel with full assistance or Excel with some assistance Excel with very little Excel without any assistance
from the teacher. from the teacher. assistance from the teacher. from the teacher.
Completeness of Only the top 4 (and below) At least 6 of the top meat At least 8 of the top meat The top 10 meat products sold
the Item Column meat products sold at a meat products sold at a meat shop products sold at a meat shop at a meat shop were identified.
shop were identified. were identified. were identified.
Completeness of A random value was assigned A random value was assigned A random value was assigned A random value was assigned
the Quantity for the quantity of a few for the quantity of some items. for the quantity of most items. for the quantity of each item.
Column items.
Completeness of The unit cost and total cost of The unit cost and total cost of The unit cost and total cost of The unit cost and total cost of
the Unit Cost and a few items were given in some items were given in most items were given in each item were given in pesos.
Total Cost pesos. pesos. The pupil based the pesos. The pupil based the The pupil based the unit cost
unit cost of some items with unit cost of most items with of each item with the current
the current cost set by the the current cost set by the cost set by the DTI.
DTI. DTI.
Accuracy in the The correct answer was The correct answer was The correct answer was The correct answer was
Total Cost of all derived with the teacher’s derived with some assistance derived with very little derived without any assistance
the Items assistance. from the teacher. assistance from the teacher. from the teacher.
Rubric for the Table and Graph
CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(1 point)
Table Format The table was not created
using Microsoft Word or
Excel.
Table Entries Only one missing data on the
table was correctly given.
Graph Format The line graph was not created
using Microsoft Word or
Microsoft Excel.
Labeling of the The x-axis and y-axis labels of
x-axis and y-axis the line graph are incorrect.
Data Analysis At most three unknown data
and were found correctly using the
Interpretation graph.
Rubric for the Design
CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(1 point)
Plan/Sketch The plan/sketch was done
on a short bond paper with
plenty of erasures. The
plan/sketch was not labeled
properly, completely, and
correctly.
Design Creativity/ The design was neither
Originality creative nor unique.
Labels The dimensions and areas of
(Dimensions and the polygons were not
Area) specified correctly.
Use of Technology Neither Microsoft Word nor
Microsoft Paint was used to
draw the final design and
indicate the dimensions and
areas of the polygons.
FAIR
(2 points)
The exact table was recreated
using Microsoft Word only.
At most two missing data on
the table were correctly given.
The line graph was created
using Microsoft Word only.
The x-axis and y-axis labels of
the line graph are
interchanged.
At most four unknown data
were found correctly using the
graph.
FAIR
(2 points)
The plan/sketch was done on a
short bond paper with evident
erasures. The plan/sketch was
labeled properly.
The design was creative but
not unique.
Some of the dimensions and
areas of the polygons were
specified correctly.
The pupil used Microsoft
Word to draw the final design
and indicate the dimensions
and areas of the polygons.
GOOD
(3 points)
The exact table was recreated
using Microsoft Excel only.
At most three missing data on
the table were correctly given.
The line graph was created
using Microsoft Excel only.
The x-axis or y-axis label of
the line graph is correct.
At most five unknown data
were found correctly using the
graph.
GOOD
(3 points)
The plan/sketch was done on a
short bond paper with minimal
erasures. The plan/sketch was
not labeled properly, and
completely.
The design was unique but not
creative.
Most of the dimensions and
areas of the polygons were
specified correctly.
The pupil used Microsoft
Paint to draw the final design
and indicate the dimensions
and areas of the polygons.
VERY GOOD
(4 points)
The exact table was recreated
using Microsoft Word and
Microsoft Excel.
All the missing data on the
table were correctly given.
The line graph was created
using Microsoft Word or
Microsoft Excel.
The x-axis and y-axis labels of
the line graph are correct.
All the six unknown data were
found correctly using the
graph.
VERY GOOD
(4 points)
The plan/sketch was done
neatly on a short bond paper.
The plan/sketch was labeled
properly, completely, and
correctly.
The design was creative and
unique.
All the dimensions and areas
of the polygons were specified
correctly.
Microsoft Word and Paint
were used to draw the final
design and indicate the
dimensions and areas of the
polygons.