BIBLIOGRAFÍA

EXPERIENCIAS E INTERACCIÓN ENTRE ALUMNOS Y DOCENTES MÉDICOS Y NO

MÉDICOS.

1. Lovell B. What do we know about coaching in medical education? A literature

review. Med Educ. 2018;52(4):376–90.
2. Lien K, Sommer JK, Bite A, Ladha Z, Roeper R, Costa A. The Role of Non-
Physician Health Care Professionals in the Education of Medical Students at
Satellite Campuses The Role of Non-Physician Health Care Professionals in the
Education of Medical Students at Satellite Campuses. J Reg Med Campuses.
2018;1(1).
3. Hamui-Sutton A, Enríquez-López P, Hernández-Becerril C, Lavalle-Montalvo C,
Vilar-Puig P. What do residents think about their tutors? A qualitative approach.
Educ Medica [Internet]. 2018;19(1):9–18. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.11.003
4. Gonzalez CMR. Percepción del ambiente educativo en estudiantes de medicina.
Cienc e Investig Médica Estud Latinoam. 2016;21(2):38–42.
5. Rojas-Bolivar D, Arroyo-Ramírez FA, Santos J, Moruquilca C, Valdivia C.
Percepción del ambiente educacional de los estudiantes de medicina de una
universidad pública peruana en el año 2014. Educ Medica [Internet].
2018;(2014). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.10.018
6. Montero L, Triviño X, Dois A, Sirhan M, Leiva L. Percepción de los académicos
del rol docente del médico. Investig en Educ Médica [Internet].
2017;6(23):198–205. Available from:
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2007505717300017
7. Riesenberg L.A., Little B.W., Wright V. Nonphysician Medical Educators: A
Literature Review and Job Description Resource. Acad Med [Internet].
2009;84(8):1078–88. Available from:
http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export
&id=L355126525%5Cnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad1a05
8. Richard Mejia Álvarez C, Dante Manuel Quiñones Laveriano I, Jhosselyn Isela
Chacón Mostacero I, Edwards Adrian Aguirre Valenzuela I, Armando Luis Miñan
Tapia I, Ana María Rosas Varillas V. Médicos investigadores: Percepción de
estudiantes de medicina y factores asociados a la posibilidad de serlo Scholar
physicians: Perception by medical students and factors associated with the
possibility of becoming one. 2017;31(3):53–63. Available from:
http://scielo.sld.cu
9. Haidet, Paul, Dains, Joyce E., Paterniti, Debora A., Hechtel, Laura, Chang, Tai,
Tseng, Ellen, et al. Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Doctor-Patient
Relationship. Med Educ [Internet]. 2002;36:568–74. Available from:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1046/j.1365-
2923.2002.01233.x/asset/j.1365-
2923.2002.01233.x.pdf?v=1&t=hci9clkd&s=62abef771903c04c4d47f425c609f
 3dbcc4caeb4
10. Prentice D, Engel J, Taplay K, Stobbe K. Interprofessional Collaboration. Glob
Qual Nurs Res [Internet]. 2015;2:233339361456056. Available from:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2333393614560566
11. Beber S, Antao V, Telner D, Krueger P, Peranson J, Meaney C, et al. Examining
the teaching roles and experiences of non-physician health care providers in
family medicine education: A qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):1–7.
12. Navarro H. N, Zamora S. J. Evaluación del rol del tutor: comparación de
percepción de estudiantes de las carreras de la salud. Investig en Educ Médica
[Internet]. 2017;(xx):1–8. Available from:
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2007505717301485
13. Shea JA. Commentary : The Work of Nonphysician and Evidence. Acad Med.
2009;84(8):982–4.

MARCO TEÓRICO CONSTRUCTIVISTA.

14. Lauckner H, Paterson M, Krupa T. The Qualitative Report Using Constructivist

Case Study Methodology to Understand Community Development Processes:
Proposed Methodological Questions to Guide the Research Process. Qual Rep
[Internet]. 2012;17(13):1–22. Available from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr
15. Johnson J, Yasugi S, Sugino Y, Pranata S, Shen S. Person re-identification with
fusion of hand-crafted and deep pose-based body region features. Int J High
Educ [Internet]. 2017;6(5):26–41. Available from:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10630
16. Thanh NC and Thanh TTL. The Interconnection Between Interpretivist
Paradigm and Qualitative Methods in Education. Am J Educ Sci [Internet].
2015;1(2):2–27. Available from:
http://www.cecc.com.au/programs/resource_manager/accounts/seaanz_pape
rs/78HamidOthmanSelematMastor.pdf%0Ahttp://www.springerreference.com
/index/doi/10.1007/SpringerReference_11623%0Awww.ijern.com%0Ahttp://
xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/24019306/564129146/name/Inte
17. Lee CJG. Reconsidering Constructivism in Qualitative Research. Educ Philos
Theory. 2012;44(4):403–12.
18. Mertens DM. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating
diversity ... [Internet]. 2009. 527 p. Available from:
http://books.google.com/books?id=m0N3tcIVds8C&pgis=1
19. Agudelo ME, Estrada P. Constructivismo y construccionismo social: algunos
puntos comunes y algunas divergencias de estas corrientes teóricas.
Prospectiva. 2012;(17):353–78.