Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

Tool for pain assessment

Deborah A. Wegman

Crit Care Nurse 2005, 25:14-15.


© 2005 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
Published online http://www.cconline.org

Subscription Information
http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions
Information for authors
http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/misc/ifora.xhtml

Submit Manuscript
www.editorialmanager.com/ccn

E-mail alerts
http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/etoc.xhtml

Critical Care Nurse is the official peer-reviewed clinical journal of the


American Association ofCritical-Care Nurses, published bi-monthly by
The InnoVision Group 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656.
Telephone: (800) 899-1712, (949) 362-2050, ext. 532. Fax: (949)
362-2049. Copyright © 2011 by AACN. All rights reserved.

Downloaded from http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/ by guest on November 25, 2014


LetterstotheEditor

Letters to the Editor are welcome presence of family while maintain- Tool for pain assessment
and encouraged. Letters must ing the integrity of the unit for other In response to the Ask the Experts
address topics that have previously patients. This may mean designat- column in the October issue (October
appeared in Critical Care Nurse. ing a waiting room or reasonably 2004:68-73) on pain and sedation
Keep your letters concise. Letters are relaxing visiting hours. We also need assessment in nonresponsive patients
subject to editing. Include your to be aware of the importance of in the intensive care unit, I would
name, credentials, title (optional),
city and state, and e-mail (for veri- including everyone in family meetings like to make readers aware of another
fication, not publication). Send to and important decision making. tool that can be used for pain assess-
Letters to the Editor, Critical Care The author also mentioned some ment. This tool is currently being
Nurse, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, common pitfalls, such as the tendency implemented in at least 14 health-
CA 92656; fax to (949)362-2049, to stereotype. I can see how this is care systems in the United States and
or send by e-mail to ccn@aacn.org. easy to do, especially when there are Canada. Accurate pain assessment
so many small variations within a has been a major focus in our burn-
culture. Though recognition of these trauma intensive care unit over the
subcultures is important, many prob- last several years. In response to this
lems can be avoided by simply treat- concern, we initially began using the
Advocate for our patients ing everyone with respect and caring. FLACC, a child-based scale, that was
I recently read the article “Cul- When in doubt, remember it is rea- recommended to us by an accredit-
turally Competent Nursing Care: A sonable and encouraged to ask fam- ing agency as the best available tool
Challenge for the 21st Century” ily members specific questions for pain assessment of nonverbal
(August 2004:48-52). I thought the regarding their practices and desires. patients. The nursing staff was very
author made some very pertinent It will open the door to communica- dissatisfied with this tool and felt
points and I am glad they have been tion and learning, as well as create a that it was not appropriate for
brought up for discussion. Cultural feeling of comfort for the patient sedated, nonresponsive adult patients
diversity is growing within the and family. receiving mechanical ventilation. A
United States and we as nurses are review of the literature was conducted
being called upon to be sensitive to Heather Peers, RN, BSN and the Adult Nonverbal Pain Scale
a variety of ethnic groups. Philadelphia, Pa (NVPS) was developed. The NVPS is
I have found that interactions a 10-point scale with 5 categories
with family members are particularly that are scored on a 0-, 1-, or 2-point
important. Family is highly valued The author replies: system. The original categories for
within many ethnic groups, and large I appreciate the positive response of the NVPS were based on the FLACC
families are not uncommon. This this reader to my article. The topic of and included face (expression/gri-
can pose a problem in the ICU setting. cultural diversity in healthcare is too macing), activity, guarding, physiol-
For instance, it is common practice multifaceted and involved to be covered ogy I, and physiology II.1 A study
within many ICUs to limit the num- in-depth by one magazine article. This was conducted to determine the reli-
ber of visitors to 1 or 2 at a time. reader made salient points, which con- ability and validity of the scale, and
However, many ethnicities have large tribute to the discussion of provision of all categories performed well. Physi-
families and it is often important for culturally competent nursing care to the ology II was the weakest performer,
all of them to be present. This is espe- diverse client population in the United and was revised to include a respira-
cially true during end of life. It is our States today. tory component with ventilator com-
responsibility as nurses to advocate pliance as an indicator, based on a
for our patients during these times Deborah Flowers, RN, PhD study by Payen et al.2 The original
and find the best way to allow the Durant, Okla NVPS scale can be viewed online at

14 CRITICALCARENURSE Vol 25, No. 1, FEBRUARY 2005


Downloaded from http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/ by guest on November 25, 2014
Adult nonverbal pain scale University of Rochester Medical Center

Categories 0 1 2

Face No particular Occasional grimace, Frequent grimace,


expression or tearing, frowning, tearing, frowning,
smile. wrinkled forehead. wrinkled forehead.
Activity Lying quietly, Seeking attention Restless, excessive
(movement) normal position. through movement activity and/or
or slow, cautious withdrawal reflexes.
movement.
Guarding Lying quietly, no Splinting areas of the Rigid, stiff.
positioning of body, tense.
hands over
areas of body.
Physiology Stable vital signs Change in any of the Change in any of the
(vital signs) following: following:
* SBP > 20 mm Hg. * SBP > 30 mm Hg.
* HR > 20/minute. * HR > 25/minute.
Respiratory Baseline RR/SpO2 RR > 10 above baseline, RR > 20 above baseline,
Compliant with or 5% ↓SpO2 mild or 10% ↓SpO2 severe
ventilator asynchrony with asynchrony with
ventilator ventilator

Abbreviations: HR, heart rate; RR, respiratory rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SpO2, pulse oximetry.
Instructions: Each of the 5 categories is scored from 0-2, which results in a total score between 0 and
10. Document total score by adding numbers from each of the 5 categories. Scores of 0-2 indicate no
pain, 3-6 moderate pain, and 7-10 severe pain. Document assessment every 4 hours on nursing flow-
sheet and complete assessment before and after intervention to maximize patient comfort. Sepsis, hypo-
volemia, hypoxia need to be excluded before interventions.
© Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, 2004. Used with permission.

www.aacn.org under the 2004 NTI angiotensin-receptor blockers


poster presentations.3 The Table (ARBs) in patients with heart failure
shows the revised scale, which is in (Ask the Experts, December
the process of being tested. 2004:67-69). As she correctly notes,
“the prescription of an ACE
References
1. Odhner M, Wegman D, Freeland N, Stein- inhibitor at hospital discharge is
metz A, Ingersoll G. Assessing pain control used by various regulatory agencies
in nonverbal critically ill adults. Dimens Crit
Care Nurs. 2003;22:260-267. as a quality indicator.” On the basis
2. Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, et al. Assessing
pain in critically ill sedated patients by using of the studies she cites and others,
a behavioral pain scale. Crit C Med. 2001;29: effective for hospital discharges after
2258-2263.
3. Odhner M, Wegman D, Freeland N, Inger- January 1, 2005, both the Joint
soll G. Evaluation of a newly developed non-
verbal pain scale (NVPS) for assessment of
Commission on Accreditation of
pain in sedated critically ill patients. Avail- Healthcare Organizations and the
able at: http://www.aacn.org /AACN
/NTIPoster.nsf/vwdoc/2004NTI Posters. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Accessed November 22, 2004. Services will revise this quality indi-
Deborah A. Wegman, RN cator to also include the use of ARBs.
Rochester, NY See CMS.gov for details.

Deborah Huber, RN
Revised quality indicator Las Vegas, Nev
I read with interest Juanita Reigle’s
excellent answer regarding the use of

CRITICALCARENURSE Vol 25, No. 1, FEBRUARY 2005 15


Downloaded from http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/ by guest on November 25, 2014
Downloaded from http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/ by guest on November 25, 2014

Potrebbero piacerti anche