Sei sulla pagina 1di 3

Tax Insights

from India Tax & Regulatory Services

Maintenance charges received in

relation to the property should be
regarded as “rent” for computing
income taxable under the head
“income from house property”

October 6, 2016

In brief
The Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) in the case of the appellant2, has held that maintenance
charges received in relation to the property should have been included within the ambit of “rent” and
be taxed under the head “income from house property.”

In detail  Pursuant to an charges should have been

understanding between the regarded as “rent” and be
appellant and the sub-sub- taxed under the head
 The appellant1 had taken on licensee, the maintenance “income from house
sub-licence, an apartment charges were paid by the property.”
in a commercial building sub-sub-licensee directly to
(Property) from a Builder. the builder. − for the purpose of
sections 22 and 23 of the
 The appellant2 entered into  The maintenance charges Income –tax Act, 1961
a sub-sub-licence were regarded as rent of the (Act), the ambit of the
agreement for sub-leasing property and was taxed in term “rent” is very wide.
of the Property. the hands of the appellant It includes any amount
under the head “income that was paid in
 As per the agreement, sub- from house property.” consideration of the
sub-licensee was liable to property being let.
pay the following sums in Issue before the High Court
relation to the property: Would maintenance charges − where the legislature
received in connection with the intended to provide
− agreed monthly rent to deduction for any
the appellant; and property be regarded as “rent”
and be taxed under the head amount, it has
− monthly maintenance “income from house property”. specifically provided for
charges as would be the deduction e.g.
payable directly to the High Court’s decision proviso to section 23(1)
builder. of the Act provides for
 The HC observed the
deduction for property
following while deciding
that the maintenance
PwC Note – It is presumed that the 2
ITA No. 369 of 2015
appellant is a “deemed owner” as per
section 27 of the Act.
Tax Insights

tax. The proviso does not taxpayer to avoid paying “income from house property.”
provide for deduction of tax on the true annual value One would have to examine
maintenance charges. of the property as the whether the said principle can be
annual value would be extended to property owners
− the rent of a property was lower. earning rental income and
dependent on the facilities maintenance charges, wherein the
of the building. The better The takeaways rental income in certain
the facilities, qualitatively circumstances should be taxed as
and/ or quantitatively, the One of the key requirements for
taxing income under the head business income, taking into
higher the rent. account the decision of the
“income from house property” is
− where the agreements that the income should be earned Supreme Court in the case of
provide that the owner by the taxpayer in its capacity as Chennai Properties and
shall pay the amounts for being the “owner” or “deemed Investments Limited3 (Please
common facilities, owner” of the property. In case refer to our news alert dated 6
maintenance charges, etc., the taxpayer is not the “owner” or May, 2015). The principles laid
it was presumed that the “deemed owner” of the property, down by the Punjab & Haryana
same had been factored in then the charging section of the High Court may not be applicable
the rent. In such event, the head “income from house to all the situations where
same could not be added to property” should not apply. In the maintenance is payable separately
the rent agreed to be paid. present case, we presume that the by the tenant. The applicability of
However, if the appellant qualified as “deemed the said principles would need to
maintenance charges were owner” of the property as per be examined based on the facts
payable separately, then it section 27 of the Act. Hence, the and circumstances of each case.
must form a part of the rent HC has not analysed the taxability
of the income under the head
Let’s talk
for the purpose of
computing the annual value “income from other sources”. For a deeper discussion of how
of the property. this issue might affect your
Further, the HC has interpreted business, please contact your
− if maintenance charges that the maintenance receipts are local PwC advisor
were not included in the to be regarded as “rent” and
rent, then it would enable a should be taxed under the head

Chennai Properties and Investments
Limited v. CIT [2015] 373 ITR 673 (SC)

PwC Page 2
Tax Insights

Our Offices

Ahmedabad Bengaluru Chennai

1701, 17th Floor, Shapath V, 6th Floor 8th Floor
Opp. Karnavati Club, Millenia Tower ‘D’ Prestige Palladium Bayan
S G Highway, 1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, 129-140 Greams Road
Ahmedabad – 380051 Bengaluru – 560 008 Chennai – 600 006
Gujarat Karnataka Tamil Nadu
+91-79 3091 7000 +91-80 4079 7000 +91 44 4228 5000

Hyderabad Kolkata Mumbai

Plot no. 77/A, 8-2-624/A/1, 4th 56 & 57, Block DN. PwC House
Floor, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Ground Floor, A- Wing Plot No. 18A,
Hyderabad – 500034, Sector - V, Salt Lake Guru Nanak Road(Station Road),
Telangana Kolkata - 700 091 Bandra (West), Mumbai – 400 050
+91-40 44246000 West Bengal Maharashtra
+91-033 2357 9101/ +91-22 6689 1000
4400 1111

Gurgaon Pune For more information

Building No. 10, Tower - C 7th Floor, Tower A - Wing 1, Contact us at
17th & 18th Floor, Business Bay, Airport Road,
DLF Cyber City, Yerwada, Pune – 411 006
Gurgaon – 122002 Maharashtra
Haryana +91-20 4100 4444
+91-124 330 6000

About PwC
At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 157
countries with more than 223,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax
services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at

In India, PwC has offices in these cities: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi NCR (Gurgaon), Hyderabad, Kolkata,
Mumbai and Pune. For more information about PwC India's service offerings, visit

PwC refers to the PwC International network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate,
independent and distinct legal entity. Please see for further details.

©2016 PwC. All rights reserved

Follow us on:

For private circulation only

This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information
contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness
of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwCPL, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all
responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based
on it. Without prior permission of PwCPL, this publication may not be quoted in whole or in part or otherwise referred to in any documents.

© 2016 PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited. All rights reserved. In this document, “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (a limited liability company
in India having Corporate Identity Number or CIN : U74140WB1983PTC036093), which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL), each
member firm of which is a separate legal entity.