Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

K-6 Standards Esther Boner, Regent University

Standard 1: Understanding and I focused my attention form the start of my


Addressing Each Childs’ Developmental student teaching on student centered
and Learning Needs environments and lessons. This careful planning
provided student with the ability to engage in
Candidates use their understanding of child their learning through their strengths and
growth and development, individual differences, motivations. I also incorporated lesson plans I
and diverse families, cultures and communities to created for multiculturalism in the classroom
plan and implement inclusive learning through a Flat Stanley activity. This also fosters
environments that provide each child with an environment at home that is inclusive of the
equitable access to high quality learning whole family and their values.
experiences that engage and create learning
opportunities for them to meet high standards. Evidence of the above lessons can be found
They work collaboratively with families to gain a under Student Centered and Differentiated
holistic perspective on children’s strengths and Instruction and Developmentally Appropriate
needs and how to motivate their learning. Instruction.
Standard 2: Understanding and Applying During my time at Regent I have had the
Content and Curricular Knowledge for opportunity to create many lesson plans
Teaching including ones that incorporated Standards of
Learning that were across the curriculum. These
Candidates demonstrate and apply Interdisciplinary lessons provide the ability to
understandings of major concepts, skills, and teach students the skills, and foster an
practices, as they interpret disciplinary curricular understanding of content far beyond factual
standards and related expectations within and knowledge. These allow the student to put a real
across literacy, mathematics, science, and social world emphasis on the content through each
studies. area of study.

Evidence of these lessons can be found under


Content Knowledge in Interdisciplinary
Curriculum.

Standard 3: Assessing, Planning, and I was able to practice this standard both outside
Designing Contexts for Learning of the classroom in my classes at Regent as well
as apply it to student teaching. I created Pre and
Candidates assess students, plan instruction and Post Assessments and monitored the data
design classroom contexts for learning. through out the unit to engage and differentiate
Candidates use formative and summative for each of my students. I used resources in both
assessment to monitor students’ learning and whole and small group and adapted my lesson
guide instruction. Candidates plan learning plans as needed to fit the needs and expectations
activities to promote a full range of competencies I set for my students. This in turn created an
for each student. They differentiate instructional environment where students felt motivated and
materials and activities to address learners’ loved so much that they invested in their learning
diversity. Candidates foster engagement in and selves.
learning by establishing and maintaining social
norms for classrooms. They build interpersonal
relationships with students that generate Evidence of this can be found under Planning,
motivation, and promote students social and Preparation, Instruction and Assessment.
emotional development.

Standard 4: Supporting Each Child’s The students in my first placement for student
Learning Using Effective Instruction teaching were in an environment that required
use of technology often. The students are at a
Candidates make informed decisions about 1:1 ratio for chrome books in this school and I
instruction guided by knowledge of children and used this to my advantage and theirs. The
assessment of children’s learning that result in students respond well to using the technology
the use of a variety of effective instructional and prefer it over pencil and paper activities. I
practices that employ print, and digital created a lesson that required the use of the
appropriate resources. Instruction is delivered Chromebook as well as group work. Students
using a cohesive sequence of lessons and worked together to define the main idea of a set
employing effective instructional practices. of clues and wrote about how they concluded
Candidates use explicit instruction and effective and how they were able to connect to the
feedback as appropriate, and use whole class content. The students then came together in
discussions to support and enhance children’s whole group closure and if they wanted, they
learning. Candidates use flexible grouping shared their narratives. All students submitted a
arrangements, including small group and portion of the work and those whom enjoy
individual instruction to support effective sharing and being heard got the chance to do so.
instruction and improved learning for every child.
Evidence of this lesson can be found under
Integration of Technology and Media Resources.
Standard 5: Developing as a Professional Collaboration happened every week in both of
my placements. I had the opportunity to
Candidates promote learning and development participate in lesson planning as well as
of every child through participation in environments that helped me understand the
collaborative learning environments, reflective curriculum and how to set forth what I was
self-study and professional learning, and learning in the classroom. I also had the
involvement in their professional community. opportunity to sit through professional
development in the schools with the teachers in
my teams to learn how to implement strategies
of performance based assessments as well as
guided reading strategies.

Evidence of collaboration can be found under


Effective Communication and Collaboration.

Potrebbero piacerti anche