Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
T: I chose to continue to
rate myself in the
“integrating” category
because I have a little
more room to grow.
Teaching for a second
year has given me to time
to really get to know my
students. I gather data
using multiple measures:
previous grades, pre/post
assessments,
entrance/exit tickets,
chats with previous
teachers, texting with
parents, conferences with
parents & students, and
more to really understand
my students. I then use
this information and
understanding to adjust
instruction and to meet
individual identified
learning needs. I believe I
have become really good
at being integrating at
this adjusting and
meeting individual
learning needs. 10.16.18
S: My principal actually
praised me because my
students were doing so
well articulating the
relevance of the lesson I
was teaching. I find that if
I do not make a lesson
relevant, then I have no
“buy in” and low
engagement. If I make a
lesson relevant, my
students are engaged and
they are active in
articulating the purpose
of the lesson and its
impact. 5.10.18
T: I develop and
systematically use
extensive information
regarding students’
cultural backgrounds,
prior knowledge, life
experiences, and interests.
I am very proactive in
developing my knowledge
of my students’ cultural
backgrounds and life
experiences. I develop
really strong rapport with
my students so they freely
share with me about their
culture and their life
experiences (sometimes
when I ask, and a lot of
times they share on their
Standard 1 CSTP: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning
own). I also learn about
their prior knowledge by
just asking them what
they know through
informal and formal
assessments. I am actually
very proud of the rapport
I build and how
comfortable the students
are sharing with me. I
then use this information
to develop lessons that
are interesting and
engaging and relevant to
my students. 10.16.18
S: My students can
articulate the relevance
and impact of lessons on
their lives and society.
They understand “why”
we are learning what we
are. They also have
visitors who visit the
classroom and they are
consistently able to
articulate the “why”
behind their learning and
the relevance of the
lesson. 10.16.18
Standard 1 CSTP: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning
Element 1.3 Emerging Exploring Applying Integrating Innovating
Uses real-life connections Explore using additional Integrates connections Integrates connections to Engages student in
during instruction as real-life connections to from subject matter to meaningful, real-life actively making
identified to curriculum. subject matter in single meaningful, real-life contexts in planning connections to relevant,
lessons or sequence of contexts, including those subject matter instruction meaningful, and real-life
lessons to support specific to students’ and is responsive during contexts throughout
understanding. family and community. instruction to engage subject matter
students in relating to instruction. 9.22.17
Connecting subject Some students relate subject matter. 5.10.18
matter to subject matter to real-life. 10.16.18
meaningful, real-life Students make use of Students utilize real-life Students actively engage
contexts real-life connections connections regularly to in making and using real-
provided in single lessons develop understandings life connections to subject Students routinely
or sequence of lessons to of subject matter. matter to extend their integrate subject matter
support understanding of understanding. 9.22.17 into their own thinking
subject matter. 5.10.18 and make relevant
10.16.18 applications of subject
matter during learning
activities.
Standard 1 CSTP: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning
Evidence My students are I work really hard to
encouraged and praised actively engage my
when they actively engage students by making
in making and using real- relevant, meaningful, and
life connections to the real-life connections in
subject matter in my both subject matters I
classes. My math students teach. I want my students
often question and make to have a deep knowledge
connections to real-life and understanding of the
when I am teaching a subject matter, not just a
lesson that seems to not broad, surface level
connect or be as relevant knowledge. That means
to their lives at first. that I actively work to
Science is easily engage my students and
connected to real-life make content relevant
because science is used daily. 9.22.17
every day and often the
students do not realize I feel I have grown in this
this. 9.22.17 area from September
until present. It has
My students have become become second nature to
experts at connecting connect my students’
their learning to real-life learning to relevant and
to extend their thinking meaningful contexts. I do
and understanding. We not get “buy in” in a
weekly have lesson unless I specifically
conversations about the state the connections
connections the students between what we are
have made from content learning to another
to real-life. I often have subject or a real-life
students who return to context. I am now
class the following day working on creating more
with new connections opportunities for deeper
and new questions about learning within individual
their connections to real- lessons. I am going to
life scenarios/situations. facilitate this by starting
During my space unit, I to incorporate more
had so many students project-based learning
making their own opportunities in my
connections to the Space- science classroom.
X Launch, to life on mars 5.10.18
and more – it was one of
the best units I have ever T: I do my best to daily
taught! I did not put and actively engage my
“innovating” here only students in making
Standard 1 CSTP: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning
because this has been a connections to relevant,
recent shift in my meaningful and real-life
classroom. I would like contexts throughout
this to continue longer subject matter
before I “level up” to instruction. When we did
“innovating”. 5.10.18 our “egg drop”
experiment, I asked the
S: The students this year students to connect their
are very active in subject-matter learning to
engaging in making and dropping supplies to
using real-life villages in other countries
connections to subject where it is hard to
matter to extend their transport breakable items
thinking. I ran the mile by road. When we did our
with the students last Rube Goldberg Machines,
week and I overheard I challenged the students
them talking about to create machines that
running the mile was an would help other people.
example of kinetic energy 10.16.18
(which we had learned
about in class), which
helped them extend their
learning OUTSIDE the
classroom! 10.16.18
Evidence I would like to get better I create resources for my I have always felt
at having my students classes that are adapted strong in creating,
actively participate in to meet my students’
instruction more. They diverse learning needs. I adapting, and
are doing well so far, but I do not just follow the integrating tech and
know they can do better. I curriculum, I add to the resources to meet my
want them to become curriculum and make it students diverse
active learners who use more engaging and learning needs. I am
the technology and relevant to my students. I
resources to their benefit. integrate different now in the refining
I want to develop their technologies and stage of this process.
curiosity and self-efficacy resources to help support I would like to refine
in the classroom, so they the diverse learning my flexible use of my
become more active in needs in my classroom. repertoire to
their learning in my 9.22.17
classes. 9.22.17 continue to refine
S: I attribute this growth and improve my
in my students’ active teaching practice. I
engagement in would also like to
instruction to really
continue to build my
strong rapport building
(and experience teaching repertoire as I refine.
in general). Students do 5.10.18
not actively engage in
instruction unless they
feel safe and comfortable T: Becoming a second
enough to engage and year teacher is so
make mistakes in the refreshing. Experience is,
classroom. I have seen truly, the best teacher.
such a huge growth in my Now that I have taught in
students active the same subjects/grade
participation and use of levels for a year I am able
resources to meet their to thoughtfully refine and
individual needs! I feel flexibly use an extensive
much stronger in this repertoire of strategies,
category, and now I also resources, and
see areas where I would technologies to meet my
like to grow (if I tweak my students’ diverse learning
classroom management needs. I am continuing to
just a bit, I think I could build my repertoire and
see some really amazing refine it to best meet my
Standard 1 CSTP: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning
results in students’ active students’ needs. 10.16.18
participation). 5.10.18
My students continue to
actively engage in
instruction and make use
of a variety of the
targeted strategies,
resources, and
technologies to meet their
individual needs. The
groups of students I have
this year are very
proactive, they want to
learn and grow and if
they struggle with one
resource or strategy they
will quickly switch to a
new resource or strategy
to better understand the
material. I think this is
because I have set a
classroom mindset of
growth and learning from
failure or mistakes and
the students actively
participate in this
mindset. 10.16.18
To be an integrating
teacher in this category, I
believe that I must
constantly adjust
strategies during
instruction based on the
feedback my students are
giving me. They are not
going to learn unless I
adjust to support,
challenge, and assist them
while we are learning.
Sometimes this adjusting
looks like giving students
more or less time to
complete an activity.
Sometimes this adjusting
looks like giving a few
student’s hints or
feedback as I walk around
the room. I am constantly
adjusting based on
ongoing monitoring of
individual needs to
continue to provide the
best education I can.
10.16.18