Hyd

NAME OF ROAD ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana CONNECTING VILLA
START ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) END Gelana NAME

BLOCK Sitamau DISTRICT Mandsaur Lodakheda
TOTAL LENGTH 4.250 IN KM SURVEY DATE 20-Apr-18 Ramnagar
LENGTH OF CC (m) 0 LENGTH OF BT (m) 4250 Dhankhedi
CC M-30 BT ROAD Dhanwada
0 0 4250 4250 7 Gelana

0 0 PROTEC
0 0 Sr. No. FROM
0 0 1 250
0 0 2 450
0 0 3 1750
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL 0 TOTAL 4250 BT CC
PACKAGE NO ROAD WAY WIDTH 7.50 7.50
LINK ROUT NO CARRIGE WAY WIDTH 3.75 3.75
QTY CUTTING 3613.1625 SHOLDER WIDTH 1.88 1.88
QTY FILLING 16452.7125 ROAD LAND WIDTH 12-15 12-10
SPEED BREAKER 5 CONSULTANCY FEES 11600 Total Length
S.No CH TBM NO LOCATION TBM RL EXISTING CD ST
1 4 01 Water Tank 100.000 S.NO CH TYPE
2 533 02 Water Tank
3 1215 03 Well Top
4 1945 04 Stone
5 2658 05 Tree
6 3178 06 Tree
7 3809 07 Stone
8 4240 08 Water Tank
0 TOTAL
INTER SECTION
CH TYPE CONDITION PROPOSED
0 T Juction Earthen Flexible
4250 Y Junction Earthen Flexible
Existing Utility for Shifting (Electric Pole & LT Line) Existing Utility for Shifting (Electric Pole & HT
S.NO CH POLE PROPOSED OFFSET SIDE S.NO CH POLE
1 92 LT Rising 3 RHS 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
TOTAL 0 6
7
PERSONE ON TRANSIT WALK NO OF PER
Female headed household :
Schedules caste
Schedules Tribe
Disabled:
BPL :
Households losing structures
Women in general
TOTAL PERSONE ON TRANSIT WALK 0
AM
SUB.ENGIN
SARPANCH
MLA
./
m
9.01E+09
9.63E+09
CONNECTING VILLAGE ROAD DESING EXISTING LAND DETIAL MATERIAL LEA
TYPE
POP LINK FROM TO EX.LAND LAND STONE
CH
813 Direct WIDTH REQ. BITUMEN
0 4250 BT
256 0-700 20-23 12-15 CEMENT
1004 700-1000 4 12-15 HUME PIPE
925 1000-4250 25-30 12-15 SAND
1861 GSB
PROTECTION WALL SELECTED FILL
TO Total Length Depth No. of Side Cost Sr. No.
260 10 2 1 1
460 10 2 1 2
1760 10 2 1 3
0 4
0 5
0 6
0 7
0 8
0 9
0 10
0 11
Total Length 30 COST 2.82
EXISTING CD STRUCTURE PROPOSED CD STRUCTURE

TYPE COST CONDITION S.NO CH TYPE
1 840 2X1000 HPC

2 1075 1-3X2 M Slab Culvert
6 2200 1X1000 HPC
7 3800 2X1000 HPC
TOTAL 0.000 7 TOTAL
Shifting (Electric Pole & HT Line)

PROPOSED OFFSET SIDE
MATERIAL LEAD
STONE 40 Sitamau
BITUMEN 660 Koyli
CEMENT 40 Sitamau
HUME PIPE 40 Sitamau
SAND 65 Banas River
GSB 15 Sitamau
SELECTED FILL 10 Local
Wearing Coat
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OSED CD STRUCTURE
TYPE COST
2X1000 HPC 3.84

X2 M Slab Culvert 7.60
1X1000 HPC 2.73
2X1000 HPC 3.84
OTAL 53.83
Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority
Detailed Project Report (DPR)
For Rural Roads Connectivity Scheme
MPRCP (Funded By World Bank )
Year 2017 - 2018
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

FOR
Double Connectivity Rural Roads under MPRCP
NAME OF ROAD :- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
DISTRICT :- Mandsaur
BLOCK :- Sitamau
PACKAGE NO :- 0
Total Length of Roa4.250 Kms

Length of C.C.Road 0.000 Kms Length of B.T.Roa4.250 Kms
Cost of CC Road ::- 1.01 Lacs
Cost of BT Road ::- ### Lacs
Cost of Repairing of 0.00 Lacs
CD :-
Cost of CDs : :- 56.64 Lacs No. of Proposed CDs 07 Nos.
Cost of ESMF :- 5.56 Lacs
Construction Cost : ### Lacs
Cost Per Kms. : 57.05 Lacs
Cost of Contingency + 0.61 Lacs
SQC
Cost of Maintenance :- 12.78 Lacs
Cost of Elec. Pole/Utiliti 1.01 Lacs
Total Cost : ### Lacs
Cost Per Kms. : 60.44 Lacs
CONSULTANT
Strength Consultant & Associates
741/9 Nehru Nagar, Near Atal Dwar, Indore (M.P)
l Road Development Authority
roject Report (DPR)
ds Connectivity Scheme
nded By World Bank )
r 2017 - 2018
PROJECT REPORT
FOR
y Rural Roads under MPRCP
CONSULTANT
nsultant & Associates
gar, Near Atal Dwar, Indore (M.P)
S. No. Chapter
1 Introduction
2 Planning and Basic Design Consideration
3 Topographic Survey.
4 Soil and Materials Survey
5 Traffic Survey
6 Hydrological Survey
7 Geometric Design Standards
8 Alignment Design
9 Pavement Design
10 Design of Cross Drainage
11 Protective Works & Drainage
12 Land Acquisition
13 Utility shifting/relocation
14 Traffic Management and Road Safety Measures
15 Specification
16 Environmental Issues
17 Analysis of Rates
18 Cost Estimate
19 Construction Program
Page No.
Chapters - 1
Introduction
1.1 Objectives of Double Connectivity Rural Roads under MPRCP

Government of Madhya Pradesh has set up a goal of providing all weather connectivity to
all its villages by year 2018 in its Vision Document (Madhya Pradesh Drishti Patra).This
also includes Black topping & gravel of all roads Earthan Roads.
Objectives of the project is to constructed alternative connectivity under MPRCP (Double

Connectivity ) to the standards of black topped roads. This bituminous surface would
mean to provide underlying layers of the required thickness and seal them with surface
course basically mean bituminous topping of premix carpet, chip seal or any other
standard means of surfacing prescribed by Indian Roads congress. Presently surfacing by
premix carpet with seal coat is being adopted. At present the roads providing Double
connectivity.
1.2 All Weather Road.
An all-weather road to be taken up in this program.An All Weather Road is a road that is
trafficable in all weather conditions. Typically this means a road that is constructed in such
a way that excessive rain does not cause it to be flooded or sodden to such an extent that
vehicles travelling over it are likely become bogged..
1.3 Core Network
The rural road network required for providing the „basic access‟ to all villages/ habitations is termed as the
Core Network. Basic access is defined as one all-weather road access from each village/ habitation to the
nearby Market Centre or Rural Business Hub (RBH) and essential social and economic services. It
comprises of Through Routes and Link Routes. Through routes are the ones which collect traffic from
several link roads or a long chain of habitations and lead it to a market centre or a higher category road, i.e.
the PMGSY Roads or District Roads or the State or National Highways. Link Routes are the roads
connecting a single habitation or a group of habitations to Through Roads or District Roads leading to
Market Centers. Link Routes may generally have dead ends terminating on habitations, while Through
Routes arise from the confluence of two or more Link Routes and merge on to a major road or to a Market
Centre.
The sub project road of ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) to Gelana Total Length 4.25 in Sitamau block of
Mandsaur district.Will Provide alternative Connectivity to 7 villages ( Antraliya ,Lakwa,Dhankedi, Ghasoi,
Gelana) to approch middle & High School ,Primary Health Center , Police station , R.I Head Quarter,Market
Center ,Panchayat Building, Railway Station Suwasra will Benefite about 8445 Papulation through a shorter
route & and also short the distance for Ghasoi tourist place will fetch higher traffic the detail is also mark in
Plan.
1.4 Geography
Mandsaur District forms the northern projection of Madhya Pradesh from its western Division, i.e., Ujjain
Commissioner's Division. It lies between the parallels of latitude 230 45' 50" North and 250 2' 55" North,
and between the meridians of longitude 740 42' 30" East and 750 50' 20" East.
1.5 Climatic Condition

The District is an average size district of Madhya Pradesh. It extends for about 142 km. from north to south
and 124 km. from east to west. The total area is 5521 km² with a population of 116483 in 2001. Rain fall
data for the site is collected from WRD division office Mandsaur ( inclosed)
1.6 The Sub-Project Road
The road passes through plain & Hilly terrain. There are Primary school, at Gelana Village & Panchyat at
Gahsoi Village hence Ghasoi and Gelana both villages are likn by this route for sevral Services . The
construct of proposed road will faciliate to approach the secondary school, helth centre, market, post office,
panchayat facility available at Suwasra. The proposed road on completation will reduse the distance of these
facility as mentioned in Annexture-1A. The Block Head quater distance of Villages Lodakheda , Ramnagar ,
Dhakadkhedi, Dhanwada, Gelana, Dhabladeval and Dhaturiya will also reduses after the completation of
proposed road. There are existing utilities like electric poles which are situated away from the carriage way
But some poles are with in right of way as mentioned in Formate 9B. The project is proposed under
alternative connectivity.
District : Mandsaur
Block : Sitamau
Road Name : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Road Length : 4.250 km.
S. Habitation benefited
No.
Direct Population benefited
1 Lodakheda 813
2 Ramnagar 256
3 Dhankhedi 1004
4 Dhanwada 925
5 Gelana 1861
6 Dhabladeval 2136
7 Dhaturiya 1450
Chapters - 2
2 Planning and Basic Design Consideration.
2.1 Alignment investigation:
The planning & Basic design of road depend upon the population of villages,there is
plain and hilly type of terrain in the proposed road & 7 no. of cross drainage work
propsed in road etc. The population of benifited villages are 8445 hence as per guide
line of MPRCP villagers facilities by all whether road .
This road passes through plan & hilly terrain and hard strata at the end of road due to
hilly area. The existing road not have proper width, geometric design and cross
drainage work so the estimate is prepared as per approved drawing & Design.road is
passing thru non habitation area hence proposed for flexibal pavement.
2.2 Key maps

Following map are enclosed in following pages.
Ø Block map of Sitamau showing all existing connectivity like district Block head quarter,
new township, National and state highway network Mandis, Hospitals, Colleges,
School etc.
Ø District Map of Mandsaur showing road network.
Ø Block map of Sitamau showing all existing connectivity like district.
Ø Map of India showing National Highways.
2.3 Road Design Brief
No. Location Issue Design solutions

Project Road Started from Ch. In a Proposed road 7 nos of
0 and ending on Ch.4250
between the road distance new CD Structure , 0-1900 &
there are 0 Existing structure
1 From Ch - 0 to 4250 2050-4250 Flexible Pavement
and 7 new proposed Structure
are required Details of the and 1900-2050 CC Pavement
structure are metioned in CD
detail Proposed as per Requirement
Road design of Flexible
2 Ch 0 to Ch.4250 Flexible Payment provided in pavement is attached in DPR
road from Ch 0 to Ch.4250 as per site condition
(Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India)
Road Key Map
District Mandsaur
Block Sitamau
Name of the road ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Total length of the road(m) 4250
ENDING VILLAGE
Gelana
CH-3800-2X1000 HPC
CH-2200-1X1000 HPC
CH-2100-1-3X2 M Slab Culvert
CH-840-2X1000 HPC
ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi)
STARTING POINT
Transect Walk
Name of Road :-
Transect Walk
ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Name of Road :- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Sr. No. Chainege Photo Details
Both side Open

1 0
Area
Both side Open

2 100
Area
Both side Open

3 200
Area
Both side Open

4 300
Area
Both side Open

5 400
Area
Both side Open

6 500
Area
Both side Open

7 600
Area
Both side Open

8 700
Area
Both side Open

9 800
Area
Both side Open

10 900
Area
One side
encroachment
11 1000
One side Open
Area
One side
Agricultural
12 1100
Land One side
Open Area
Both side Open

13 1200
Area
Both side Open

14 1300
Area
Both side Open

15 1400
Area
Both side Open

16 1500
Area
Both side Open

17 1600
Area
Both side Open

18 1700
Area
Both side Open

19 1800
Area
Both side Open

20 1900
Area
Both side Open

21 2000
Area
Both side Open

22 2100
Area
Both side Open

23 2200
Area
Both side Open

24 2300
Area
Both side Open

25 2400
Area
Both side Open

26 2500
Area
Both side Open

27 2600
Area
Both side Open

28 2700
Area
Both side Open

29 2800
Area
Both side Open

30 2900
Area
Both side Open

31 3000
Area
Both side Open

32 3100
Area
Both side Open

33 3200
Area
Both side Open

34 3300
Area
Both side Open

35 3400
Area
Both side Open

36 3500
Area
Both side Open

37 3600
Area
Both side Open

38 3700
Area
Both side Open

39 3800
Area
Both side Open

40 3900
Area
Both side Open

41 4000
Area
Both side Open

42 4100
Area
Both side Open

43 4200
Area
Chapters – 3
3 Topographic Survey
3.1 General
Topographic survey true to ground realties have been done using Auto Levels, and prismatic compass.
The topographic survey have been carried out by the Surveyors / Supervisors under the guidance of
PIU.
The in-house standards, work procedures and quality plan prepared with reference to IRC: SP 19-2001,
IRC: SP 20, IRC: SP 13 (in respect of surveys for rivers / streams) and current international practices
have been followed during the above survey.
3.2 Traversing
Traverse have been done by prismatic compass & Tape.
3.3 Leveling
All leveling for establishing Benchmark are to be carried out as per method adopted by Survey of India.
All leveling are to be carried out with Auto Level having accuracy ± 2.5 mm/ km. The Consultant
started the work by assuming arbitrary level, as no GTS benchmark may be available in the nearby
location of the road.
3.4 Cross Section & Detailing

Cross section were taken at 25 m interval and at closer interval in curved portion of the existing road.
The following features of the road have been recorded:
• Existing road details
• Existing toe point of Road
• Natural Surface Points
• Edge of Water Body / Pond
• Edge of ditch / Borrow pit
• Electricity and Telephone poles
• Edge of Building & Fence line
• Religious Structure & Graves
• Temporary House or Hut
• Edge of Wall
• Concrete Wall
• Trees
• Cross roads and other major crossings
3.5 Data Processing

All data from topographic survey recorded by Auto Levels, and prismatic compass were downloaded
and final alignment, plan, profile were prepared and presented in AutoCAD Format.
3.6 List of permanent reference pillars and TBMs excluding northing easting and
levels.
3.7 List of permanent reference pillars :

prismatic compass.
nder the guidance of
to IRC: SP 19-2001,
nternational practices
d by Survey of India.
km. The Consultant
ailable in the nearby
of the existing road.
ss were downloaded
.
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Name of Road :- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana ( Exisiting cart track soil test result ) District :- Mandsaur
Length of Road 4.250 Km Block :- Sitamau
Sieve Analysis Atterberg Limits

MDD OMC
Chainage Describtion Percent Passing Against IS Sieve LL PI
S.No Location
(meter) of Sample
26.5 mm 10 mm 4.75 mm 2.36 mm 0.425 mm 0.075 mm % % g/cc %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 0 - 1000 200 Yellow.SOIL 100 100 98 97 80 45 33.00 28.00 1.65 15.15
2 1000 - 2000 1450 Yellow.SOIL 100 100 99 95 78 52 40.00 27.00 1.63 15.34
3 2000 - 3000 2655 Yellow.SOIL 100 100 97 96 75 50 38.00 22.00 1.64 15.24
4 3000 - 4000 3840 Yellow.SOIL 100 100 97 95 76 53 42.00 25.00 1.65 17.60
Note :- Existing cart track is suitable to recived further layers of embankment. Exisiting cart track not needs any kind of soil removel.
ctivity Rural Roads under MPRCP
Rural Development, Govt. of India)
RATORY TEST RESULTS
CBR
15
3.65
3.83
3.56
3.74
nt. Exisiting cart track not needs any kind of soil removel.
Data Sheet for Compaction Test of Soil
Name of PIU :- Mandsaur

Name of Block :- Sitamau
Name of road/ Section Details: :- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Chainage :- 200 Mtr.
Description of Sample Yellow.SOIL

Type of Test Standard Proctor
Weight of mould W1 (gm) 3600
Volume of mould Vm (CC) 981.25
Weight of wet soil (gms) W2-W1
Weight of mould + compacted
Moisture content determination

Wet Density (gm/cc)
Dry density (gm/cc)

Weight of dry soil (Ws)
Weight of Container +
Weight of water (Ww)
Moisture content (%)

Soil (gms) W2
Weight of Container
Container No.
wet soil (gms)
dry soil (gms)

S. No.
(gms)
(gms)
(gms)
(W)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 5269.57 1669.57 1.670 7 15.7 40.0 37.39 2.61 21.69 12.05 1.490
2 5352.30 1752.30 1.752 2 16.4 45.0 41.70 3.30 25.30 13.05 1.550
3 5424.82 1824.82 1.825 6 16 41.0 37.92 3.08 21.92 14.05 1.600
4 5500.00 1900.00 1.900 4 14.5 49.0 44.46 4.54 29.96 15.15 1.650
5 5471.93 1871.93 1.872 3 12.8 46.0 41.53 4.47 28.73 15.55 1.620
Dry Density
1.67
1.65
1.63
1.61
1.59
1.57
1.55
1.53
1.51
1.49
12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1
Moisture
MDD 1.65 gm/cc
OMC 15.15 %


Wet Density (gm/cc)
Dry density (gm/cc)


Soil (gms) W2
Weight of Container
Container No.
wet soil (gms)
dry soil (gms)

S. No.
(gms)
(gms)
(gms)
(W)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 5249.89 1649.89 1.650 5 15.60 40.0 37.34 2.66 21.74 12.24 1.470
2 5332.53 1732.53 1.733 7 15.70 45.0 41.57 3.43 25.87 13.24 1.530
3 5404.95 1804.95 1.805 4 14.50 41.0 37.70 3.30 23.20 14.24 1.580
4 5480.00 1880.00 1.880 8 15.00 49.0 44.48 4.52 29.48 15.34 1.630
5 5451.80 1851.80 1.852 2 16.40 46.0 41.98 4.02 25.58 15.74 1.600
1.69
Dry Density
1.67
1.65
1.63
1.61
1.59
1.57
1.55
1.53
1.51
11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9
Moisture
MDD 1.63 gm/cc
OMC 15.34 %


Wet Density (gm/cc)
Dry density (gm/cc)


Soil (gms) W2
Weight of Container
Container No.
wet soil (gms)
dry soil (gms)

S. No.
(gms)
(gms)
(gms)
(W)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 5259.73 1659.73 1.660 2 16.40 40.0 37.44 2.56 21.04 12.14 1.480
2 5342.42 1742.42 1.742 6 16.00 45.0 41.63 3.37 25.63 13.14 1.540
3 5414.89 1814.89 1.815 8 15.00 41.0 37.78 3.22 22.78 14.14 1.590
4 5490.00 1890.00 1.890 1 15.00 49.0 44.50 4.50 29.50 15.24 1.640
5 5461.87 1861.87 1.862 3 12.80 46.0 41.51 4.49 28.71 15.64 1.610
Dry Density
1.71
1.69
1.67
1.65
1.63
1.61
1.59
1.57
1.55
1.53
11.7 12.7 13.7 14.7 15.7
Moisture
MDD 1.64 gm/cc
OMC 15.24 %


Wet Density (gm/cc)
Dry density (gm/cc)


Soil (gms) W2
Weight of Container
Container No.
wet soil (gms)
dry soil (gms)

S. No.
(gms)
(gms)
(gms)
(W)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 5198.50 1598.50 1.599 4 14.50 40.0 36.67 3.326 22.17 15.00 1.390
2 5251.46 1651.46 1.651 5 15.60 45.0 40.88 4.121 25.28 16.30 1.420
3 5270.24 1670.24 1.670 8 15.00 41.0 37.26 3.740 22.26 16.80 1.430
4 5293.44 1693.44 1.693 6 16.00 49.0 44.06 4.939 28.06 17.60 1.440
5 5275.60 1675.60 1.676 2 16.40 46.0 41.48 4.515 25.08 18.00 1.420
Dry Density
1.45
1.44
1.43
1.42
1.41
1.40
1.39
15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5 17.0 17.5 18.0
Moisture
MDD 1.44 gm/cc
OMC 17.60 %
C.B.R. Test As Per IS: 2720 PART - 7
Name of PIU Mandsaur Wt. of mould 8.520 Kg

Name of Block Sitamau Wt of Material 3715.73 Kg
Name of Road ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana Volume of mould 2251.96 cc
CH- 200 Mtr. MDD 1.65 gm/cc
Mould No 1 OMC 15.15 %
Type of Soil Yellow.SOIL
Provingring calibration facter 1.25
S.No Penetration Division

1 0.0 8
2 0.5 16 70
3 1.0 23
4 1.5 29 60
5 2.0 33
6 2.5 40 50
7 3.0 43
Proving Ring Division
8 3.5 45 40
9 4.0 47
10 4.5 50 30
11 5.0 51
12 5.5 52 20
13 6.0 54
14 6.5 55 10
15 7.0 57
16 7.5 59 0
17 8.0 60 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
18 8.5 62
CBR
Penetration at 2.5 mm 3.65

Name of PIU Mandsaur Wt. of mould #REF! Kg

1 0.0 0
2 0.5 -5 90
3 1.0 5 80
4 1.5 17
5 2.0 30 70
6 2.5 42
60
7 3.0 44
8 3.5 50 50
9 4.0 55
40
10 4.5 59
11 5.0 62 30
12 5.5 65
13 6.0 71 20
14 6.5 74 10
15 7.0 77
16 7.5 79 0
17 8.0 81 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
18 8.5 82
CBR

Name of PIU Mandsaur Wt. of mould #REF! Kg

1 0.0 0
2 0.5 -8 90
3 1.0 2 80
4 1.5 14
5 2.0 27 70
6 2.5 39
60
7 3.0 42
8 3.5 48 50
9 4.0 53
40
10 4.5 57
11 5.0 58 30
12 5.5 61
13 6.0 67 20
14 6.5 70 10
15 7.0 73
16 7.5 75 0
17 8.0 77 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
18 8.5 78
CBR

Name of PIU Mandsaur Wt. of mould 8.560 Kg

1 0.0 0
2 0.5 8 70
3 1.0 15
4 1.5 21 60
5 2.0 25
6 2.5 41 50
7 3.0 35
8 3.5 37 40
9 4.0 39
10 4.5 42 30
11 5.0 43
12 5.5 44 20
13 6.0 46
14 6.5 47 10
15 7.0 49
16 7.5 51 0
17 8.0 52 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
18 8.5 54
CBR

BM/TBM DETAILS
Name of Road ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana Block Sitamau

Length of Road 4.250 km. District Mandsaur
S.No Chanage TBM No. Location of TBM Value of TBM

1 4 01 Water Tank 100.000
2 533 02 Water Tank 0.000
3 1215 03 Well Top 0.000
4 1945 04 Stone 0.000
5 2658 05 Tree 0.000
6 3178 06 Tree 0.000
6 3809 07 Stone 0.000
8 4240 08 Water Tank 0.000
3.7 Checklist
Reference pillars given Yes No
TBM Yes No
Traverse survey carried out Yes No
Cross section and detailing carried out Yes No

4 Soil and Materials Survey
4.1 General
The soil and material investigations were done following the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2002 and IRC:
SP: 72-2015 and other relevant IS codes.
4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing
Soil samples will be collected along and around the road alignment at One locations per km, from the
existing road. Soil Classification tests like grain size analysis and Atterberg’s limit were conducted for
the samples collected. Standard Proctor test and the corresponding 4 day soaked CBR test were
conducted either for a minimum of one test per km for soil samples of same group or more tests due to
variation of soil type. The following tests were conducted as detailed below:
Grain size analysis as per IS : 2720 (Part 4) – 1985

Atterberg’s limit as per IS : 2720 (Part 5) – 1985
Standard Proctor density test as per IS : 2720 (Part 7) – 1980
4 day soaked CBR test as per IS : 2720 (Part 16) – 1985
The details of soil testing if given in Annexure-I
4.3 Analysis of Test Results

The laboratory soaked CBR value ranges from 3.56% to 3.83 %. The soil laboratory test results will be
summarized in Table 4.1 as given below.
Table 4.1 CBR values for different stretches
S.No. Section CBR %

1 200 3.65%
2 1450 3.83%
3 2655 3.56%
4 3840 3.74%
5 Traffic Surveys
5.1 General
In the present scenario of Double connectivity road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume count has been
conducted on the already completed or similar type of road (Runija to Dhabla Deval ) and PWD road
(Suwasara to Runija) in the vicinity (Key Map Attched ) of the project road. The Classified Volume
Count survey has been carried out in accordance with the requirements of the TOR and relevant codes
(IRC: SP: 19‐2001, IRC: SP: 20, IRC: SP: 72 ‐2007).The surveys have been carried out by trained
enumerators manually under the monitoring of Engineering Supervisor.
Table 5.1 Average Daily Traffic (both ways)
No. Type of Vehicle Day-1 Day-2 Day-3 Average
1 Car, Jeep, Van 20 25 25 23
2 Scooters/Motorbikes 26 36 33 32
3 Trucks/Bus / Minibus 14 14 12 13
4 Tractors with trailer 33 35 32 33
5 Cycles 14 9 16 13
6 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 7 11 10 9
Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd) 47 49 44 47
Total motorised vehicle per day 93 110 102 102
Total non‐motorised vehicle per day 21 20 26 22

5.2 Traffic Growth Rate and forecast
An average annual growth rate of 6% over the design life has been adopted.
Table 5.2 Average Annual Daily Traffic (both ways)
No. Type of Vehicle ADT AADT Growth Rate
1 Car, Jeep, Van 23 18 6%
2 Scooters/Motorbikes 32 25 6%
3 Trucks/Bus / Minibus 13 10 6%
4 Tractors with Trolley 33 26 6%
5 Cycles 13 10 6%
6 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 9 7 6%
123 96
Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd) 47 37
Total motorised vehicle per day 102 81
Total non‐motorised vehicle per day 22 18
Total ESAL 175266

6 Hydrological Survey
6.1 General
Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that
the rain water can pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on the
following observations:
Rainfall Data (inclosed)
Catchments Area (inclosed)

6.2 Rainfall Data
The District is an average size district of Madhya Pradesh. It extends for about 142 km. from north to
south and 124 km. from east to west. The total area is 5521 km² with a population of 116483 in 2001.
Rain fall data for the site is collected from WRD division office Mandsaur ( inclosed)
6.3 Catchment Area

The determination of Catchments area for bridge from topographical sheet of survey of India.
7 Adopted Geometric Design Standards
7.1 General
The geometric design standards for this project conform to the guidelines as stated in IRC-SP 20.2002
and NRRDA circular letter No. P 17035/1/207/Tech. Dated 13th Oct.2010. Recommended design
standards vis-à-vis the standards followed for this road are described below.
The present road is a link road as per NRRDA policy circulated on 13 Oct. 2010. The carriage way
each 3.75m wide & formation width 7.5m. However due to availability of land and further expected
generation of traffic, carriageway width 3.75 meter & formation width 7.5 wide has been proposed.
Hence no deviation in this road.
7.2 Terrain
Terrain is plain & hilly for this road.
7.3 Design Speed

Design speed for project road is 50 km/h
7.4 Right of Way (ROW)

The requirement of ROW for this road is as follows (as specified in IRC ‐SP 20:2002):
Right of Way (ROW) Width (m) Available at site

Open Area 15 20
Built up area 6-10 Not Applicable
7.5 Sight Distance

The safe stopping sight distance is applicable in the geometric design. The sight distance values for
this road as per IRC recommendations are presented below:
Design Speed (km/hr) Safe Stopping Sight Distance (m)

20 20
30 30
40 45
50 60
7.6 Radius of Horizontal Curve
According to IRC recommendations/standards, the minimum radius of horizontal curve for this project
road is given below:
Radius of Horizontal Curve (m)

Terrain Category
Ruling Minimum Absolute Minimum
Plain 90 60
7.7 Camber & Super elevation

A camber adopted for flexible pavement(Black Top)is 3.5% and for the hard shoulders 4.5%. A super
elevation adopted on this road section is 6% . The maximum super elevation is 7% as per IRC 73-1980
7.8 Vertical Alignment

The present road is in plain terrain and vertical alignment has veen maintained by rulling gradient as
per IRC guideline.
7.9 Vertical Curves

For satisfactory apperance the minimum length of vertical curve for different design speed is given in
IRC SP-20:2002.
7.10 Side slope

The cross slope for Bitumenious paved carriegeway (3.75 m wide) and hard shoulders (1.875m wide).
Side slope (fill) - 2 (H) : 1 (V)
Side slope (cutl) - 1 (H) : 1 (V)
7.15 Extra widening of pavement

The extra widening of pavement at curve as per IRC guideline is given below :
Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21-60 Above 60
Extra widening for 3.75m wide

0.9 0.6 Nil
single lane carriegewat (m)
TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SURVEY
DISTRICT Mandsaur
BLOCK - Sitamau
ROAD ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
LCV -Cars/ Vans/

MCV -Agricultural MCV -Agricultural Jeeps/ Three
HVC-Bus/Truck HVC-Bus/Truck
TIME Tractor Trailor Tractor Trailor Wheelers Two wheelers Cycles
(Laden) (Unladen)
(Laden) (Unladen) (Laden/Unladen/O
verloaded)
Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day
DAY Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
7.00 to 8.00 A.M. 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1

8.00 to 9.00 A.M. 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 3 2 2
9.00 to 10.00 A.M. 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 5 6 1 1 2
10.00 to 11.00 A.M. 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 3 3 2 1 4 2 1 2
11.00 to 12.00 A.M. 0 0 2 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 5 2 1 1
12.00 to 1.00 P.M. 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 3 3 2 4 1 1 0 1
1.00 to 2.00 P.M. 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 3 3 1 0 1
2.00 to 3.00 P.M. 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 2 4 1 1 1
3.00 to 4.00 P.M. 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
4.00 to 5.00 P.M. 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 4 2 2 1 1 2
5.00 to 6.00 P.M. 1 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 5 5 2 1 2
6.00 to 7.00 P.M. 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 6 4 2 1 1 2
7.00 to 8.00 P.M. 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 8 8 5 6 6 7 16 16 16 17 19 16 0 0 0 20 25 25 26 36 33 14 9 16
7 6 16 17 23 32 13
Date of Survey 20-Apr-18 to 22-Apr-18

PAVEMENT DESIGN AS PER IRC SP-72 2015
LCV -Cars/ Vans/

HVC- HVC- MCV -Agricultural MCV -Agricultural Jeeps/ Three
Two Bullock
Bus/Truck Bus/Truck Tractor Trailor Tractor Trailor Wheelers Cycles Total Motorized
wheelers Cart (SWC)
(Laden) (Unladen) (Laden) (Unladen) (Laden/Unladen/
Overloaded)
7 6 16 17 23 32 13 9 123 101
Duration of Harvesting Season in Days (From Local Inquiry) t= 75
Average Traffic During Non-Harvesting Season (Considered half of

the total traffic in peak season) T= 123
Average increase in Traffic During Harvesting Season (Total Traffic

in Peak Season - Traffic During Non-Harvesting Season) nT = 123 = 123
Average Annual Daily Traffic AADT = T + ((1.2 x nT x t)/365) AADT = 123 + (1.2 x 123 x 75 ) / 365 = 153
It is Presumed that road will open for traffic after 1 Year Therefore
ADT after 1 year. By considering 6% growth rate
ADT = AADT x (1+ 0.06)^n = 153 x (1.06) ^ 1 = 162
For Pavement Design Consider the Proportionate value of HCV, MCV, SWC out of ADT
Cumulative ESAL
S. ESAL Per Day N = T0 x 365 x L x [((1+.06)n - 1)/0.06]
Vehical Type Proportionate Number VDF Value (T0)
No. N = T0 x 4811 x L (Lane distribution Fac
L=1)
HVC-Bus/Truck (Laden &

1 9.22 2.86 26.37 126856
Over loded)
HVC-Bus/Truck
2 7.90 0.31 2.45 11786
(Unladen)
MCV -Agricultural Tractor
3 21.07 0.34 7.16 34470
Trailor (Laden)
MCV -Agricultural Tractor
4 22.39 0.02 0.45 2154
Trailor (Unladen)
Total 60.59 Total 175266
ADT = 162
Final Cumulative ESAL 175266
Traffic Category T4
The Traffic parameters has been categorized into 7 categories as under :- Sub grade Strength Classes (according to SP-72 - 20
T1 10,000 to 30,000 ESAL Applications Quality of

Class Range ( CBR %
T2 30,000 to 60,000 ESAL Applications Subgrade
T3 60,000 to 1,00,000 ESAL Applications Very Poor S1 2
T4 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 ESAL Applications Poor S2 3-4
T5 2,00,000 to 3,00,000 ESAL Applications Fair S3 5-6
T6 3,00,000 to 6,00,000 ESAL Applications Good S4 7-9
T7 6,00,000 to 10,00,000 ESAL Applications Very Good S5 10 - 15
From the Soil Test Result Design CBR of Sub grade 5%

From the Soil Surveys the Sub grade Strength Class S4
Design Data :
OGPC = 20 mm
WMM = 150 mm
Granular Sub Base = 125 mm

Total Crust Thickness = 275 mm
tivity Rural Roads under MPRCP
VOLUME COUNT SURVEY
Bullock Cart
(SWC)
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
1 1
2
1 2 1
0 1
1 1 1
2 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 2
1 1
7 11 10
9
ESIGN AS PER IRC SP-72 2015
Motorized
101
Cumulative ESAL
N = T0 x 365 x L x [((1+.06)n - 1)/0.06]
N = T0 x 4811 x L (Lane distribution Factor
L=1)
126856
11786
34470
2154
175266
Sub grade Strength Classes (according to SP-72 - 2015)
Range ( CBR %)
2
3-4
5-6
7-9
10 - 15
DESIGN OFF RIGID PAVEMENT ( As Per IRC SP-62-2014)
WHEEL LOAD : 50000 N
:
k VALUE :
From Table 1, The k Value Corresponding to a CBR Value of 5 : 42x10-3 N/mm2/mm
:
Sub Base :
GSB : 100 mm
WMM : 75 mm
Effective k Value
Since a Sub Base is Provided, the k Value can be increased by 10 %
Effective k Value : 1.2x42x10-3

: 50.40x10-3 N/mm2/mm
Concrete Strength
Adopt a 28 days compressive strength of 30 Mpa

Flexural Strenght ff = 0.7√ fc 3.834
: 3.834 MPa
:
90 days Flexural Stength : 1.1x3.834
: 4.22 MPa
Thickness
Try a Thcikness of 180 mm
Edge Load Stress

By Equation σle= 0.803 P/h2(4log10l/a+0.666(a/l)-0.034)
σle = 2.76 Mpa
σle = Load Stress in Edge Region (Mpa)

P= Design Wheel Load (N) 50000 N
h= Pavement Slab Thickness mm 180 mm
E= Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Mpa) 30000 N/mm2
k= Modulus of Subgrade Reaction of Pavement Foundation (N/ mm 3x 103) 50.40x10-3
l= radius of raltive stiffness (mm)
l = 4√Eh /12(1-µ2 )k
3
l= 737.57
a= radius of contact assumed circular (mm)

a= ((0.8521 x P/p x 3.14)+(S/3.14) x (P/0.5227p) 1/2)1/2 226.05 mm
p = Tyre Pressure 0.8 Mpa
Tempreature Stress
From Table-4, the tempreature differencial for North MP for a slab thickness of 180 mm is 12.86 0
C
Assuming a Contraction Joint Spacing of 3.75m and 3.75 m width.
σte = (Eα∆t/2)C L/l and W/l

σte = 1.42 1
σte = Tempreature Stress in the edge region (Mpa) 2
∆t Maximum tempreature diffrential (o C) 12.86 3
α Cofficient of Thermal expansion of Concrete (o C) 10x10-6 4
5
L 3750 mm 6
B 3750 mm 7
L/l 5.08 8
W/l 5.08 9
C 0.74 10
11
12 & above
Total Stress 4.18 < 4.22
Hence Safe
VEMENT ( As Per IRC SP-62-2014)
0.0504
C
0
0.04
0.175
0.44
0.72
0.92
1.03
1.077
1.08
1.075
1.05
1
8 Curves Design / Improvement of existing curves
8.1 General
The geometric design standards for this project conform to rural road guidelines and the
guidelines as stated in IRC-SP 20:2002. Recommended design standards vis-à-vis the
standards followed for this road are described below: -
On this project road no vertical carves exist. So not applicable.
8.2 Design of Junctions
The proposed alignment intersects cross roads and forms junctions. The locations of
junctions are given below:
Table 8.4 – List intersections, type and proposed modifications

No Type of Location Exiting Proposed modification
intersection (km) condition
1 T Juction 0 Earthen Flexible

2 Y Junction 4250 Earthen Flexible
Chapters - 9
9 Pavement Design
9.1 General
Considering the subgrade strength , projected traffic and the design life, the pavement
design for low volume MPRCP roads were carried out as per guidelines of IRC: SP: 72 –
2015.
9.2 Pavement Design Approach
9.2.1 Design Life
A design life of 10 years will be considered for the purpose of pavement design of flexible
and granular pavements.
9.2.2 Design Traffic

The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total
commercial vehicle per day (CVPD) was presented in Table 5.2.
9.2.3 Determination of ESAL applications

Only commercial vehicles with a gross laden weight of 3 tonnes or more are considered.
The design traffic will be considered in terms of cumulative number of standard axles to be
carried during the design life of the road. The numbers of commercial vehicles of different
axle loads are converted to number of standard axle repetitions by a multiplier called the
Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF).An indicative VDF value will be considered as the traffic
volume of rural road does not warrant axle load survey.
For calculating the VDF, the following categories of vehicles is considered as suggested in
paragraph 3.4.4 of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015.
Ø Laden Heavy/Medium Commercial vehicles

Ø Un-laden /partially loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
Ø Over loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
Indicative VDF values considered 10% of laden MCV and 10% laden HCV as overloaded
& given below:
Vehicle type Laden Un-laden /Partially laden

HCV 7 6
MCV 16 17
Lane distribution factor (L) for Single lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application = To x
4811 x L, where To = ESAL application per day The Cumulative ESAL application for the
project road as per paragraph 3.5 of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015
9.3 Design Alternatives a

Design alternatives considered
Chainage Design alternatives considered a
Selected design
Justification
Pavement Shoulder
Hard Full
full width
shoulder
Earthen
Flexible
From To
width
Rigid
Hard
0 4250 YES NO Yes Yes Yes Yes

9.4 Pavement Composition
Flexible Pavement
Summary of CD Structures

District :- Mandsaur
Blcok :- Sitamau
Length of Road :- 4.25
Detail of Proposed CD Structure

Standard Cost As Per
S.No. RD Type of CD Structure
Annexures (Rs. Lacs)
1 840 2X1000 HPC 3.84
2 1075 1-3X2 M Slab Culvert 7.60
3 1700 1-6X4 M Slab Culvert 13.83
4 1900 1-6X4 M Slab Culvert 14.04
5 2100 1-3X2 M Slab Culvert 7.94
6 2200 1X1000 HPC 2.73
7 3800 2X1000 HPC 3.84
Total cost of Proposed CD structures 53.83
1 Protection wall / Toe wall 2.82
Total cost of Protection & Toe wall 2.82
Total Cost of CD's & structures 56.64
LIST OF PROPOSED CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
Name of Road - ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana

DISTRICT Mandsaur BLOCK : Sitamau
Dia of
No. of Catchment Area
Sr. No. Chainage Type of Structure pipe/Opening Remark
Rows/Span in Sqkm
(mm)
1 840 2X1000 HPC 1 2000 0.102
2 1075 1-3X2 M Slab Culvert 1 3000x2000 1.010

3 1700 1-6X4 M Slab Culvert 1 6000x4000 5.600
4 1900 1-6X4 M Slab Culvert 1 6000x4100 7.200
5 2100 1-3X2 M Slab Culvert 1 3000x2000 1.050
2 2200 1X1000 HPC 1 1000 0.039
3 3800 2X1000 HPC 2 2000 0.095
HYDROULIC CALCULATION OF CD STRUCTURES
Name of Work :- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Catchment Catchment Q' from Dicken's Allowable

Area of
S.No. Chainage Area Area Formula in Cumecs Discharge through Type of CD Proposed
Flow
(Hectare) (Sq.Km.) (C=19) Culvert
1 840 10.23 0.102 3.437 1.570 3.93 2X1000 HPC
2 2200 3.86 0.039 1.655 0.785 1.96 1X1000 HPC
3 3800 9.50 0.095 3.251 1.570 3.93 2X1000 HPC

CALCULATION OF CD STRUCTURES
Remark
100% Discharge passing

Hydraulic Design of Slab Culvert
Name of Road : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana Chainage: 1075
( Refer IRC Spl. Publication No. 13 , Guidelines for The Small Bridges and Culverts )
18.15 Dicken's discharge = CM3/4 cumecs 18.15

26.51 Discharge (Area -Velocity) = cumecs 26.51
S.No. Chainage Distance Bed H.F.L Depth Ave.depth Deference Area in Perimeter
( meters) ( x) in m Level (BL) (HFL-BL) m in m. in BL (y) Sqm (3x7) Ö(x²+y²)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
NBL HFL
1 1068.5 0 91.77 92.531 0.77 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.8
2 1069.4 0.928 91.56 92.531 0.97 0.9 0.2 0.8 1.0
3 1070.4 0.928 91.51 92.531 1.02 1.00 0.05 0.92 0.93
4 1071.3 0.928 91.37 92.531 1.16 1.09 0.14 1.01 0.94
5 1072.2 0.928 91.18 92.531 1.36 1.26 0.20 1.17 0.95
6 1073.1 0.928 91.10 92.531 1.43 1.39 0.07 1.29 0.93
7 1074.1 0.928 91.01 92.531 1.52 1.47 0.09 1.37 0.93
8 1075.0 0.928 91.01 92.531 1.53 1.52 0.00 1.41 0.93
9 1075.9 0.928 91.10 92.531 1.43 1.48 0.10 1.37 0.93
10 1076.9 0.928 91.18 92.531 1.35 1.39 0.08 1.29 0.93
11 1077.8 0.928 91.22 92.531 1.32 1.33 0.03 1.24 0.93
12 1078.7 0.928 91.37 92.531 1.16 1.24 0.16 1.15 0.94
13 1079.6 0.928 91.56 92.531 0.98 1.07 0.19 0.99 0.95
14 1080.6 0.928 91.64 92.531 0.90 0.94 0.08 0.87 0.93
Total - 14.888368 12.17
(A) (P)
Hydraulic mean depth R= A / P = 1.223 m.
Slope of Nala S = U/s RL : 91.426 - D/s RL : 90.666 = 0.002

H.F.L. COMPUTATIONS :
1 Catchment area : 1.95 sq.km.
0r 0.75 sq. miles.
2 Dicken's Constant c = 11
Dickens Discharge = discharge to be considered 18.15 cumecs.
3 Discharge by A x V Method
n= 0.028
A = 14.888368 sq.m.
P = 12.17 m.
R = 1.223 m.
V = 1.78 m / sec
Trial Discharge at section = AxV = 26.51 Cumecs
Design Discharge = 18.15 Cumecs
4 H.F.L.at R.L. 92.531 m.is justified.
u²/2g Pier
hf TEL
h Water Surface
u Du
H Dd Post Constr- HFL 92.531 m
Ht. of Piers required 1.53 m
Bed
Page 78 of 260
Design for Openings:-
1 Catchment area at proposed site = 1.95 sq. km.
2 Flood Discharge by Dicken's Formula = 18.2 cumecs
3 Minimum clearence required as per IRC(Q< 300 cumecs) = 600 mm
4 Nala Bed Level RL ( m) = 91.006 m
5 U/S HFL as per computations = 92.531 m
6 Soffit level of bridge = 93.131 m
7 Maximum difference of U/s and D/s =
water levels at full spate( Flood Lift) h = 0.80 m
Post Construction HFL( Pre.con HFL+Afflux) = 93.33 m
8 Depth of flow at the bridge Du ( HFL-NBL) = 1.53 m
9 Length of single clear span Ls = 3.0 m
10 No. of span provided , n = 1 No.
L = 3 Du = 1.53 m
11 Discharge through the culvert :-
Static Head ( Average depth of flow ) = 2.28 m
Head due to velocity of approach, v²/2g = 0.16 m
Total operating head H = 2.44 m
Discharge under the bridge Q= 1.706 Cw L H³/² = 18.31 cumecs
18.31 > 18.15 Hence OK
Coefficient Cw may be taken as under -

1. Narrow brdge opening with or without floors = 0.94
2. Wde brdge opening with floors = 0.96
3. Wde brdge opening with no bed floors = 0.98
Check for Afflux , x:-

Velocity of flow generated at bridge site, v = = 1.78 m/sec
Width of the stream at HFL , L= = 6.00 m aprox.
Linear waterway under the bridge , L1 = = 3.00 m
Coeffcient of discharge under the bridge , c = = 0.70
Acceleration due to gravty , g = = 9.81 m/sec²
Afflux, x= v²/2g((L²/l1²c²)-1)) = 0.51 m
( This about assumed flood lift)
Permissible velocties under different strata :

Loose clay or fine sand up to 0.50 m/s
Coarse sand 0.50 to 1.00 m/s
Fine gravel , sandy or stiff clay 1.00 to 1.50 m/s
Coarse gravel , rockey soil 1.50 to 2.50 m/s
Boulders , Rock 2.50 to 5.00 m/s
DEPTH OF FOUNDATION :
Design Discharge = = 18.15 Cumecs
HFL as per computations = 93.13 m
Nala bed level = RL = 91.01 m.
Silt factor f = 1.50 for medium / Course sand.
Scouring depth :R =0.47 ( Q/f)^0.33 1.07 m
Hard Strata at the proposed site , 0.90 m depth of foundation shall be sufficient.
The maximum scour depth to be taken
for a straight reach = 1.27 R = 1.61 m.
Foundation level of Pier = H.F.L.- SCOURING DEPTH. = 91.53 M.
Depth of Foundation at Lowest Nala Level = = 90.67 m.
Provide Minimum Depth of foundation as = 1.5 m.
Actual foundation level = = 89.51 m.
Page 79 of 260
Name of Road : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana Chainage:
34.63 Dicken's discharge = CM3/4 cumecs

82.04 Discharge (Area -Velocity) = cumecs
S.No. Chainage Distance Bed H.F.L Depth Ave.depth Deference Area in

( meters) ( x) in m Level (BL) (HFL-BL) m in m. in BL (y) Sqm (3x7)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
NBL HFL
1 0 0 94.15 94.150 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 5 5 93.93 94.15 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6
3 10 5 93.71 94.15 0.44 0.33 0.22 1.66
4 15 5 93.49 94.15 0.66 0.55 0.22 2.77
5 20 5 93.26 94.15 0.89 0.77 0.22 3.88
6 25 5 93.04 94.15 1.11 1.00 0.22 4.98
7 30 5 92.82 94.15 1.33 1.22 0.22 6.09
8 35 5 92.60 94.15 1.55 1.44 0.22 7.20
9 40 5 92.82 94.15 1.33 1.44 0.22 7.19
10 45 5 93.05 94.15 1.10 1.22 0.22 6.08
11 50 5 93.27 94.15 0.88 0.99 0.22 4.96
12 55 5 93.49 94.15 0.66 0.77 0.22 3.85
13 60 5 93.71 94.15 0.44 0.55 0.22 2.74
14 65 5 93.94 94.15 0.21 0.32 0.22 1.62
Total - 53.567857
(A)
0r 1.08 sq. miles.
n= 0.025
A = 53.567857 sq.m.
P = 65.06 m.
R = 0.823 m.
V = 1.53 m / sec
u²/2g Pier
hf TEL
h Water Surface
u Du
Bed
L = 6 Du = 1.55 m
34.84 > 34.63 Hence OK


Afflux, x= v²/2g((L²/l1²c²)-1)) = 0.08 m

( Sheet Rock strata is avalable at site ) ) =
1700
34.63
82.0
Perimeter
Ö(x²+y²)
10
0.0
5.0
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
65.06
(P)


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
NBL HFL
1 0 0 94.62 94.620 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 5 5 94.41 94.62 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5
3 10 5 94.19 94.62 0.43 0.32 0.21 1.61
4 15 5 93.98 94.62 0.64 0.54 0.21 2.68
5 20 5 93.76 94.62 0.86 0.75 0.21 3.75
6 25 5 93.55 94.62 1.07 0.96 0.21 4.82
7 30 5 93.33 94.62 1.29 1.18 0.21 5.89
8 35 5 93.12 94.62 1.50 1.39 0.21 6.96
9 40 5 93.33 94.62 1.29 1.39 0.21 6.96
10 45 5 93.55 94.62 1.07 1.18 0.21 5.89
11 50 5 93.76 94.62 0.86 0.96 0.21 4.82
12 55 5 93.98 94.62 0.64 0.75 0.21 3.75
13 60 5 94.19 94.62 0.43 0.54 0.21 2.68
14 65 5 94.41 94.62 0.21 0.32 0.21 1.61
Total - 51.964286
(A)
0r 1.03 sq. miles.
n= 0.025
A = 51.964286 sq.m.
P = 65.06 m.
R = 0.799 m.
V = 1.50 m / sec
u²/2g Pier
hf TEL
h Water Surface
u Du
Bed
L = 6 Du = 1.50 m
33.73 > 33.51 Hence OK


Afflux, x= v²/2g((L²/l1²c²)-1)) = 0.08 m

1900
33.51
78.0
Perimeter
Ö(x²+y²)
10
0.0
5.0
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
65.06
(P)


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
NBL HFL
1 0 0 95.94 95.940 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 5 5 95.70 95.94 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6
3 10 5 95.45 95.94 0.49 0.36 0.24 1.82
4 15 5 95.21 95.94 0.73 0.61 0.24 3.04
5 20 5 94.97 95.94 0.97 0.85 0.24 4.25
6 25 5 94.73 95.94 1.21 1.09 0.24 5.46
7 30 5 94.48 95.94 1.46 1.34 0.24 6.68
8 35 5 94.24 95.94 1.70 1.58 0.24 7.89
9 40 5 94.46 95.94 1.48 1.59 0.22 7.95
10 45 5 94.68 95.94 1.26 1.37 0.22 6.86
11 50 5 94.90 95.94 1.04 1.15 0.22 5.77
12 55 5 95.11 95.94 0.83 0.94 0.22 4.68
13 60 5 95.33 95.94 0.61 0.72 0.22 3.58
14 65 5 95.55 95.94 0.39 0.50 0.22 2.49
Total - 61.078571
(A)
0r 0.27 sq. miles.
n= 0.025
A = 61.078571 sq.m.
P = 65.07 m.
R = 0.939 m.
V = 1.67 m / sec
u²/2g Pier
hf TEL
h Water Surface
u Du
Bed
L = 2 Du = 1.70 m
12.93 > 12.38 Hence OK


Afflux, x= v²/2g((L²/l1²c²)-1)) = 6.55 m

2100
12.38
102.1
Perimeter
Ö(x²+y²)
10
0.0
5.0
5.01
5.01
5.01
5.01
5.01
5.01
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
65.07
(P)
Chapters - 11
11 Protective Works & Drainage
11.1 General
Road passes through the plain & hilly terrain.
11.2 Road side drain (Pucca)
As the insufficient drainage of surface water leads to rapid damage of road, road side drain as
shown in drawing volume has been provided .
S.No. Ch from To Length
1 250 260 = 10 m
2 450 460 = 10 m
3 1750 1760 = 10 m
Total length 30 m
11.3 Protective Works

Necessary protection works consisting of closed guard stone have been provided near pond
and water bodies falling within the proposed alignment.
Table 11.3 List of protective works
Type of protective works
S. No. Chainage Comments
LHS RHS
1 250-260 - RHS Well
2 450-460 - RHS Well
3 1750-1760 - RHS Well
Chapters - 12
12 Land Acquisition
12.1 General
The existing road is generally an earthen track. Thus the project road is a new connectivity
road. The existing Road occupied width (ROW) details show in formate 9b of social formates.
12.2 Proposed ROW

The width of carriageway has been considered as 3.75 m in accordance with the IRC-SP 20:
2002. The total roadway width is limited to 7.5 m with 1.875 m earthen shoulder on either
side of carriage way. Patwari naksha also showing the details about availabel width in social
formates.
12.3 Additional Land

Local administration and local panchayat agreed at minor areas in places for development of
the road. Villagers are generally highly enthusiastic during site visits for selection of the road.
During Transect Walk information collected and duly documented in the specified format
where from it confirmed that the land and earth will be available. The two PAP agreed to
provide the land for road construction but feared to sign MOU, Inspire of convincing and
detailing about MOU PAP did not singe MOU. other 09 people have encroached the land and
they are ready to give the land at the time of road construction and the MOU is also signed.
Chapters - 13
13 Utility shifting/relocation
13.1 Existing utilities
Existing utilities that required relocation along the project road as given below.
18.3 Abstract of Cost
Unit rates will be derived by using the “Schedule of Rates for Road Works, Culvert
works and Carriage etc. MPRRDA”.
The details of cost are enclosed in Format F6 & Format F7. The abstract of Cost
estimate is given in the Table below.

( Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India )
District : Mandsaur Block : Sitamau
Name of Road : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Abstract of Cost
Length (KM) /
S.No. Particulars Description Total Cost (in Lakhs)
Number
Flexible Pavement
Ch 0 -4250, -, -, -, -, - 4.25 185.37
1 Pavement
Cement Concrete Pavement
Ch -, -, -, -, -, - 0.00 1.01
Total 4.25 186.38

Type of CD
1 Row HPC new flayring 0.00
1 Row HPC 2.73
2 Row HPC 7.69
2 CD structure 1-6X4 M Slab Culvert 27.87
1-3X2 M Slab Culvert 15.54
0.00
Protection wall 2.82
Existing CD Cost 0.00

Total 56.64
3 State Fund Cost Eletric Pole Shift & Inauguration 1.06
Grand Total (1+2+3) 4.250 244.08

Per Km Cost of Road 57.43
18.4 Maintenance
Cost of Annual Maintenance for five years after completion of project is estimated as per the
PMGSY Guidelines. Different activities of ordinary repairs are done as and when. Total Cost of
5 year Routine Maintenance as given below :
Five Year Routine Maintenance ( With GST )
Year Cost in Lakh % Cost Cost /KM

I 1.57 0.64 0.37
II 1.85 0.76 0.43
III 2.72 1.11 0.64
IV 3.12 1.28 0.73
V 3.52 1.44 0.83
Total Maintenance Cost, Rs. : 12.78 Lakh 3.01
List Showing the details of E.P./H.T. Line/L.T.
Line/Existing/Passing
LT LINE
S.no Chainage Details Offset Side (L / R)
1 92 Rising 3 RHS
Chapters - 19
19 Construction Program
19.1 General
This is a high rainfall area and rainy season extends from June to September. However, the construction
program is based for a total working period of 12 months, considering the program set out by MORD.
Generally, dry working season of about 8 months are required for construction of CMGSY roads.
However, works will be affected for the monsoon during the month June to September. It is anticipated
that some activity like collection of materials, CD works etc. will continue in monsoon period also.
19.2 Realistic duration

Duration of The contract for 12 Months including rainy session.
ACTIVITIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Mobilization
Earth Work
CD Structure/
Protection Work
Sub- Base
WMM
PMC & S.C.

Road Safety Sign
& furniture
Community Consultation Checklist - Engineering
Question Yes No N/A
1. Are there any flood prone areas on the road?
If yes:
1.1 Are locations specified and inspected?
1.2. Is high flood level specified for each stretch?
2. Are there any locations on the road where irrigations ducts need to be
provided?
If yes:
3. Can the road be used as a shortcut by through traffic?
4. Does the road lead to any quarries, mining areas, brick kilns, logging areas,
tourist attractions etc.?
5. Are there plans to build new schools, hospitals, temples etc
6. Is there potential for double connectivity?
If yes:
6.1 Is information on location, size and nature of additional traffic
generators and specific routes obtained?
7. Is there a need for deviations from existing track?
If yes:
7.1 Were the proposals for deviation shown on site and explained to the
community?
7.2 Is the land availability checked?
7.3 If there is a need for donation, were the owners consulted
regarding their agreement to donate the land?
8. Is there a need for speed breakers?
If yes:
8.1 Is location and rational for speed breakers identified?
8.2 Is rationale verified and checked on site?
8.3 Are alternative or additional locations discussed?
9. Are all existing intersections checked with the community on site?
9.1 Is the use of intersecting roads identified (e.g. school children, farm
machinery, etc)?
10. Are proposed culvert locations verified with the community?
10.1 Is there a need for additional culverts?
10.2 If yes, are locations identified?
11.1 If yes, are locations identified?
For DPR consultant For PIU For PIC
Format F-8
NAME OF ROAD ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana

BLOCK Sitamau
DISTRICT Mandsaur

RATE ANALYSIS
MATERIAL SOURCE LEAD (IN KM)
STONE Sitamau 40.00 km.
BITUMEN Koyli 660.00 km.
CEMENT Sitamau 40.00 km.
HUME PIPE Sitamau 40.00 km.
SAND Banas River 65.00 km.
GSB Sitamau 15.00 km.
SELECTED FILL Local 10.00 km.

ANNEX 3.a) FORMAT FOR RECORDING TRANSECT WALK &
CONSULTATIONS WITH THE AFFECTED PERSONS
1) Name of Road ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
2) Villages Gelana
3) Gram Panchayat Lodakheda
4) Block Sitamau
5) District Mandsaur
6) Date : Time : 4/20/2018
7) Total Number of Participants in the Transect walk :

0
8) Numbers of Participants in the following categories
- Female headed household : -
- Schedules caste -
- Schedules Tribe -
- Disabled: -
- BPL : -
- Households losing structures -
- Women in general -
9) Name & Designation of the key Participants
- From Government
ASSISTENT MANAGER SUB-ENGINEER

MPRRDA MPRRDA
- From Panchayatir Raj Institutions (PRI) :
MLA SARPANCH / SECRETARY

VIDHAN SABHA GRAMPANCHAYAT
10) Issues and suggestions raised by the participants

(i) Road alignment and design in general (PIUs to consult prompt list
in Annex 3(b)
No suggestion raised by MLAs public Public participants.
(ii) Road width and land availability ;
Required road width and land available

(iii) The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two
criteria : a) written verification (entry in the government list of BPL or
possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected
person/family falls in the category in
NIL
(iv) Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people :
NIL
(v) Sensitive locations (forest, cultural properties etc.
No forest & cultural properties curves in road alignment.
(vi) Water related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation
water courses, other water bodies etc)
No
(vii) Road safety related issues (major junctions, curves, bends etc.)
No
(viii) Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits etc.
No
11) Major outcomes of the Transect walk
(i) Changes to be incorporated in the design
Not required
(ii) Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for

donation.
Extend land taken & willingness of land owners attached.
(iii) Environment issues to be resolved
No
(iv) Other issues
No
Brief summary of consultation held during transect walk ;
Suggestions given by participants are incorporated in alignment.
Major issues discussed during the consultations
Yes
Recommendations of the social safeguards specialist :
No recommendations given by social safeguard specialist.
The Road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above
issues.
Attached seperately
- Countersigned
(Signature & name) (Signature & name)
Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram panchayat AE/JE, PIU
Attendense
Community PIU/PRI
Name of the Participants Signature Name and designation Signature
of official
VCW GOOD
1 4542
CONDITION
VCW GOOD
2 4542
CONDITION
VCW GOOD
3 4542
CONDITION
VCW GOOD
4 4542
CONDITION
Summary of provisions
Name of Road ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
District Mandsaur
Block Sitamau
Total length (m) 4250
Proposed Typical Cross Total Cost of Pavement (Rs. in

Chainage (from - to) Length (m.)
Section lacs)
Ch 0 -4250, -, -, -, -, - 4250 B (Flexible) 185.37
Ch -, -, -, -, -, - 0 C (Rigid) 1.01
Total Cost of the pavement (Rs. Lacs) 186.38

CHECK LIST FOR P.I.U. & S.T.A
(For Individual Road works)
To be filled by PIU.
1. Location: - State:- Madhya Pradesh District:- Mandsaur

2. Package No.: 0
3. Name of the Road: From: ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To: Gelana
4. Length (Km): Total : 4.250 Km. In Built up area: 0.000 Km.
5.Total Project Cost(without GST) Rs.: 217.93 Lakh Average Cost per km without GST :
6.Total Project Cost (with GST) Rs.: 244.08 Lakh Average Cost per km with GST :
Cost Total Cost

Cost Lakh Lakh (lac) Cost Per Km.
State Fund Details Item
Without GST With without without GST
GST GST
Eletric Pole Shift 0.90 1.01 Flexible Pavement 165.51 38.94
Diff. of H/S & E/S 0.00 0.00 Rigid Pavement 0.90 0.00
Diff. of Higher Cost of CD (Pr. & Ex.
0.00 0.00
Specification Repairing) and Protection 50.57 11.90
Inauguration 0.05 0.06 wall
Total 0.95 1.06 Total 216.98 51.05
6. Types of Proposal:- New Connectivity/Upgradation

O If the proposed road is a New connectivity YES/NO
- Is the road part of core network
If Yes, Link Route Number
- Name of the unconnected Habitation (s) (to be crosschecked with Ramnagar,Dhankhedi,Dhankhedi

CN-6)
- Population sub served by the proposed road 4859
- Does the Proposed Road lead up to the habitation for which it is
supposed to provide connectivity (In other words are you sure that the YES/NO
road is not being made partially?)
- Does the Proposed Road connect the unconnected Habitation to
(a) Another Habitation having All-weather road.

(A) (B)
(b) Directly to an All weather road.
If (b), indicates the nature of road to which the proposed road leads.
RR MDR
O If the proposal is for up gradation YES/NO

- Is the road a part of the core network YES/NO
- Is it associated Through Route or not YES/NO
- PCI value
- Age of the Road given
- It is certified that there are is other Unconnected Habitations in
YES/NO
the district.
7. (a) Whether the Proposed Road has the desired carriageway
YES/NO
width, Roadway width and Road Land Width (RLW).
(b) Indicate the actual widths of the following for the proposed
road.
In the Build up Area (m)
a) Carriageway 3.75
b) Roadway 7.50
c) Road Land Width 12-10
INDEX MAP (Not to Scale)
CH-840 CH-1075 CH-1700 CH-1900 CH-2100

ANANDD
(Ghasoi)
HAM
Pro.CD Pro.CD Pro.CD Pro.CD Pro.CD
CH-3800
Pro.CD CD1, CD2, - Cross Drainage

Name of Road : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Cross Section Details

a) Cross Section of the existing road showing different component layers :
b) Cross Section of the proposed road showing different component layers as per design IRC SP 72 : 2015
(Should be as per Actual Provisons of DPR)
Seprate Sheet Attached
8. Base year traffic volume
Month & Year of Traffic Survey 20-Apr-18 to 22-Apr-18

Motorized Traffic
Agricultural Tractors
Car, Jeep, Vans, Three Motorised Truck and Buses
Trallers
Days Wheelers & Light Two
Commercial Vehicle Wheelers
L U OL L U OL
Day 1 20 26 8 6 0 16 17 0
Day 2 25 36 8 6 0 16 19 0
Day 3 25 33 5 7 0 16 16 0
Average 23 32 7 6 0 16 17 0
Total 101
ADT in the year of Traffic Count = 162
Growth rate adopted (%) = 6% Base Year Traffic AADT (T) =
Design Life = 10 Years
Number of Harvesting Seasons = 1
No. of Day in Each Harvesting Seasons (t) = 75
Value of (n) assumed = 10 Cumulative ESAL =
Traffic Category =
9. Sub Grade CBR (for different sections) =
Chainage 200 1450 2655 3840
Actual CBR (%) 3.65% 3.83% 3.56% 3.74%
Design CBR (%) 5.00%

Cost in lac
10. Cost Details
without GST
A. General Costs : Cost of Preparation of DPR 0.493
B. Pavement Components, Description of the layer
Thickness
D. Pavement Components, Description of the layer
(mm)
Earth Work - in Excavation / Cutting Variable

Earth Work - in Filling (Embankment) Variable
Subgrade (if provided seperately) (Flexible Pavement) 300
Subgrade/ E/S (if provided seperately) (Rigid Pavement) 150
Shoulders (if not considered in the Earthwork) (Flexible Pavement) 170
Shoulders (if not considered in the Earthwork) (Rigid Pavement) 255
Granular Sub Base (Flexible Pavement) 125
Granular Sub Base (Rigid Pavement) 150
Soil + Aggregate Mix
WMM 150
WBM GR III 0
WBM GR II 0
C. Bituminous Layers
Prime Coat
Tack Coat
OGPC 20
Seal Coat
MPM / BBM
Surface Dressing
D. Cement Concrete Road : Pavement Quality Concrete (M30) 180
E. CD Works No. of Existing CD Works: 0

Do they require any improvement - specify the nature of imprevement proposed
If yes, their Number and cost of improvement (Rs. Lacs)
Location - Chainage (Similar Type of CD's may be grouped together)
Type of CD Nos.
, 2200, 3815, , , , , , , , , , , , 1 x 1000 HPC 2

840, 1075, , , , , , , , , , , , , 2 x 1000 HPC 2
1900, 1700, , , , , , , , , , , , , 1-6X4 M Slab Culvert 2
1075, 2100, , , , , , , , , , , , , 1-3X2 M Slab Culvert 2
Total Without
12% GST
Total Cost of Proposed CD Works 48.06

F. Protection Works Length: 30.00 Mt
G Pucca Side Drains (if provided) Length: 0.000 Km
H. Road Logo, wheepholes , Guard stone, Speed Breaker, 600mm,300mm dai pipe and Other Road Furiniture
I. Clearing and Grubbing Road Land , Setting out work
Total Cost of the Project (Rs. In Lac)

Name of the Road: ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
J. Five Year Routine Maintenance: Length 4.250 Km.
% of
Length
Cost in Cost in Cont.
Length Of BT Road Of CC % of Cont. Cost
Year Rate (RS) with out with Cost Cost /km
(KM) and (Rate) Road without GST
GST GST with
(km)
GST
I 4.250 33000 0.000 24500 1.40 1.57 0.57 0.64 0.37
II 4.250 38800 0.000 24500 1.65 1.85 0.68 0.76 0.43
III 4.250 57100 0.000 24500 2.43 2.72 0.99 1.11 0.64
IV 4.250 65500 0.000 24500 2.78 3.12 1.14 1.28 0.73
V 4.250 74000 0.000 24500 3.15 3.52 1.29 1.44 0.83
Total 11.41 12.78 3.01
11. Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Road Manual RRM/Latest Circulars
of NRRDA. YE
12. Whether CD works / Protection works are provided as per RRM/Latest Circulars of
NRRDA./Respective Codes YE
13. Whether the cost Estimates are as standard data analysis and S.S.R 01 Sept. 2017 YE
14. Sources and the Lead distances of Materials are as under
Material Source Lead Distance Material Source

Earth Local 15.00 km. Cement Sitamau
Murroom Local 10.00 km. Emulsion Koyli
Aggregate Sitamau 40.00 km. Bitumen Koyli
Sand Banas River 65.00 km. Steel Sitamau

Certified that information provided is true:
Prepared by: Checked By:
STA
To be filled by State Technical Agency
Name of the STA:

Name of the road : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
15. Is the Proposed Road Entered on the OMMS:
(Data entries to be verified by STA before Clicking the Proposal)
16. If the proposal is for new connectivity
O Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed Road is a part of the Core Network
O Is the unconnected habitations (s) part of list of unconnected Habitations as per CN-6
O Does the Proposal ensure full connectivity of the Target habitation
a) If No, the name of Unconnected Habitation up to which it is connected
b) If such Unconnected Habitation eligible under PMGSY
17. Are you satisfied with the following
O Engineering Surveys (L-Section, X-Section must be verified)
O Soil / Material Investigation (CBR, Density, LL, PI, Gradation to be verified)
O Traffic Surveys / Estimation
O Hydraulic Studies
(Catchments for structures with more than 2 Vents to be verified from toposheet. Location and
requirement of all CD structures to be verified from L-section)
18. In case, Traffic is projected beyond T4 Category are you satisfied with the reason given by PIU:
19. In case, sub grade CBR is less than 3; has Soil Stabilization etc. been proposed.
(If not, specific Reasons given by PIU)
20. Is the design of the following elements as per Rural Road Manual/Circulars of NRRDA:
¡ Alignment & Geometric
¡ Location and type of CD works and
¡ Side Drains
¡ Integration for Cross and Longitudinal Drainage
¡ Protection Works
21. Is the design of flexible pavement as per IRC SP:72-2015 and design of rigid pavement as per IRC SP:62-2014.
22. Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SSR generated for the current phase
23. Does the proposal have provision for

¡ PMGSY Logo Sign Boards & Information Boards
¡ Km / Hm Stones
¡ Guard Stones (where necessary)
¡ Traffic Sign Boards (as necessary)
24. Specific remarks, if any, by STA
(Specific remarks of STA about the overall project are necessary on each DPR)
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed Road work based on the data and S.S.R. 01 Sept. 2017 provided by E
is entered on the OMMS. The proposal may be considered for clearance.
Technical Scrutiny at STA done by: Co-ordinator STA

PERFORMA "C"
RCP
Block:- Sitamau
Gelana
In Open area: 4.250 Km.
51.278 Lakh
57.43 Lakh
Total Cost (lac) Cost Per Km.

with GST with GST
185.37 43.62
1.01 0.00
56.64 13.33
243.02 57.18
YES/NO
YES/NO
SH NH
YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
In the Open Area (m)

3.75
7.50
12-15
CH-2200
Pro.CD
Gelana
4.25
CD2, - Cross Drainage Works

Attached
n IRC SP 72 : 2015 Attached
Non Motorized Traffic
Animal Drawn
Cycles Vehicle
Cycles Ricksh
aw Num.
SWC
Tyre
14 0 7 0
9 0 11 0
16 0 10 0
13 0 9 0
22
AADT (T) = 153
175266
T4
0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Cost/Km (Rs.) Cost in lac with ost/Km (Rs.) with
without GST GST GST
0.116 0.55 0.13
Cost in
Cost in Cost/Km Cost/Km
lac
Quantity lac with without with
without
GST GST GST
GST
6195.04 2.73 3.05 0.64 0.72
16452.71 24.35 27.27 5.73 6.42
14442.05 26.00 29.12 6.12 6.85
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2955.03 10.08 11.29 2.37 2.66
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2257.74 21.63 24.22 5.09 5.70
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2451.53 39.67 44.43 9.33 10.45

13.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7.00 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01
16605.45 7.47 8.37 1.76 1.97

16605.45 1.99 2.23 0.47 0.53
16605.45 17.44 19.53 4.10 4.59
16605.45 6.14 6.88 1.45 1.62
18.000 0.90 1.01 0.21 0.24

Total 158.42 177.43
mprevement proposed With GST

NO 0 0.00 0.00
Total Length of Cost in
Cost in Rs.
Bridge / Rs. With
Without GST
Culvert (Mt) GST
2.43 2.73
0.000 6.86 7.69
24.88 27.87
15.360 13.88 15.54
Per KM without Total Without

12% GST
Per KM with GST
GST
11.31 53.83 12.66
Cost in
Cost in Cost/Km Cost/Km
lac
lac with without with
without
GST GST GST
GST
2.52 2.82 0.59 0.663
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
uriniture 5.94 6.65 1.40 1.56
1.56 1.75 0.37 0.41
10.01 11.21
Cost /km
0.37
0.43
0.64
0.73
0.83
3.01
YES/NO
YES/NO
YES/NO
Source Lead Distance

Sitamau 40.00 km.
Koyli 660.00 km.
Koyli 660.00 km.
Sitamau 40.00 km.

Scrutinized By:
STA
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
NA Yes / No
NA Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes (wef 01 Sept. 2017)
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
2017 provided by Engineers. The Proposal after final correction
Co-ordinator STA:
MP Rural Road Development Authority, Bhopal (M.P.)
Year : 2017-2018 - Left Out / Wrongly shown (as per SSR w.e.f. 01.09.
Proposed Length Other Cost (i

(in Kms) Lakhs)
Total
Cost of
Cost of Estimated 12% GST Total Cost
Name Name of Type of No. of CD
S. Name of Name of Pavement Cost in amount i/c GST
of the Proposal Total CD Works Provision
No. District PIU BT CC R&D (Rs.in (Rs.in of coloum (Rs.in
Block Road N/U Length (in Lakh) Works (Rs.in for Electric
Length Length Length Lakh) no. 14 Lakh)
kms) Lakh) Telephone
(in kms) (in kms) (in kms) (11+13)
(7+8+9) Sevice
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
ANAND
DHAM
Mandsau
1 Mandsaur Sitamau (Ghasoi) N 4.25 0.00 0.00 4.25 166.41 7 50.57 216.98 26.04 243.02 0.90
r
To
Gelana
4.25 0.00 0.00 4.25 166.41 7.00 50.57 216.98 26.04 243.02 0.90
Prepared By
Checked By
Scrutinized By
FORM-B
y Rural Roads under MPRCP
pment Authority, Bhopal (M.P.)
ngly shown (as per SSR w.e.f. 01.09.2017)
Other Cost (in

Lakhs)
Total Total Total G.Total Maintena

12% GST Name of
Remark
Other Cost i/c State (16+21) Avg. nce Cost
Provisio in amount R&D
Cost (in GST (in Cost with (TOTAL Cost/ i/c GST
n for of coloum Technolo
Lakhs) Lakhs) GST PROJEC Km. (Rs. in
Road no. 19 gy
(17+18) (19+20) (17+21) T COST) Lakh)
inaugrati
on
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
0.05 0.95 0.11 1.06 98.27 244.08 57.43 12.78 -

###
0.05 0.95 0.11 1.06 98.27 244.08 57.43 12.78 ###
###
###
###
Technical Scrutiny
done by
Coordinator
STA
FORMAT - F-1
Summary Sheet
Total No. of Unconnected Habitations / Villages

Name of Block Habitations /
Villages > 1000 500-1000 250-500 <250 Package No. 0
Sitamau 5 1 District Mandsaur

No. of New Villages
Estimated Cost
Connected
Total Length No. of New Pavement
Type of Work No. of Roads
of Road (Km) CD Structures from Format CD Structure from State Cost Total [(5)+(6)] Total Villages
SC/ST
Format F-2A Villages
F-2B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Upgradation
New Construction 1 4.250 7 186.38 56.64 1.06 244.08 5
Total 1 4.250 7 186.38 56.64 1.06 244.08 5

FO
Roads proposed in PMGSY for Rural Connectivity (Cross Drainage Structures)
District : Mandsaur Block : Sitamau Package No.
Existing CD Structure by Type Details of Proposed CD Structure by Type

Upgradation (Use N/U)
New Construction /
Road Length (Km)

Cost
Name of Road
of Box Culvert/ Minor

Box Culvert /
Minor Bridge / Repair Hume Pipe Arch Culvert Bridge /
S.No.
Arch Culvert /
Details
Cause Ways / Culvert / Slab Cause
Slab Culvert
Disma Culvert Ways
ntling
Chg Dia Repair Chg Len Repair Chg Lengt Repair No. Dia No. Length N Dia
mm. /Repla gth /Repla h /Repla (mm) (mts) o. (mm)
ce ce ce
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
1-3X2
1 1 Row 1 M Slab
HPC Culvert
cost 2.73 7.94
1-6X4
0 1Row HPC 2
Flyring M Slab
Junction Culvert
cost 27.87
1-3X2
2 Row M Slab
1 N 4.250 2 HPC 1 Culvert
cost 7.68562887 7.60

ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi)
1 N 4.250
Pr Wall
cost 0.00 2.82
State Cost
cost 1.06
FORMAT - F-2A
ectivity Rural Roads under MPRCP
Rural Development, Govt. of India)
or Rural Connectivity (Cross Drainage Structures)
Package No. 0
(Rs. In Lakhs)
Details of Proposed CD Structure by Type
Total Cost of Pavement
Total Cost of the Road

Total Cost of Proposed
from Format F-2B

CD Structures
24 25 26
57.71 186.38 244.09

57.71 186.38 244.09
1
1
S. No.
ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) From
2
ges
by Road
Name of
Gelana To
Connected
Places/Villa
N
New Construction/Upgradation(Use N/U)
Name of Road :-
D
Facitity accessed (Use A/B/C/D)
5
District : Mandsaur
Road Length (Km)
4.250
6
Earthen Existing Surtace Type
7
A, B & C Applicable Cross Section
8
Thickness (m) Details
9
Clearim 8 & Grubbing
10
Setting out of work
11
Excavation of Road & drains
Block : Sitamau
12
Construction of C.C. drains
13
Earth Work
0.300
14
Hard Shoulders BT/CC
0.17/
0.255
&
15
GSB
0.100
0.125
Length 4.25
16
WMM
Km
17
WBM 3
0.150 0.000
18
Prime Coat
Details of Thickness & Cost for pavement Layers
19
Tack Coat
Roads proposed in PMGSY for Rural Connectivity ( Pavement Layers)
20
PMC+Seal Coat
0.020
21
CC Pavement
0.180
5th Km, Km, 0.2 Km Stones and

22
Signages
Special works such as Service

23
Ducts, Guardstones, Consultancy

25
Total Cost of pavement

FORMAT - F-2B
(Rs.in Lakhs)
ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi)
A, B & C
Earthen
Gelana
1 N D 4.250
Cost
0.97 0.78 3.05 0.00 56.39 11.29 24.22 44.43 0.00 8.37 2.23 26.41 1.01 2.40 4.84 186.38
Form
COST ESTIMATE FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION
District : Mandsaur Package no:- 0

Block : Sitamau Link Rout No:- 0
CC Road Detail BT Road Detail
Road Name :- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana From To Length From To Length
0 0 0 0 4250 4250
Length oF Road :- 4.25 km 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 Total 4250
Road Estimate
Length in Width in Depth in
S No. SOR No. Description No. Quantity Unit Rate
mts mts mts
Clearing and Grubbing Road Land :- Clearing and grubbing road land including
uprooting wild vegetation, grass, bushes, shrubs, saplings and trees of girth upto 300 mm,
removal of stumps of such trees cut earlier and disposal of unserviceable materials and
1 2.2 (A) stacking of serviceable material to be used or auctioned, upto a lead of 1000 m including
removal and disposal of top organic soil not exceeding 150 mm in thickness as per
Technical Specification Clause 201.
(A) In area of non-thorny jungle 1 4250 7.500 3.188 Hect 27179.00

Removal of Telephone/Electric Poles and Lines :- Removal of telephone/electric poles
with wires including excavation and dismantling of foundation concrete and lines under
the supervision of concerned department, disposal with all lifts and upto a lead of 1000 m
2 2.9 and stacking the serviceable and unserviceable material separately as per Technical
Specification Clause 202.
0 Nos. 993.00
mts mts mts
Setting out work completed with construction of reference benchmark/working

benchmark (minimum 5per Km ), made of concrete M-10 of size 575x575x450mm
with a base of size 900x900x100mm including white washing, marking of
chainage, Levels etc.(As per drawing Annex-I) and reference pillars made of cut
stone having minimun thickness 65 mm / precast concrete poles/concrete (M-10)
filled AC pipes @ 100 m interval embaded in concrete base of M-10 of size
3 1.6 A 300x300x750mm on both sides of the formation width, marking on centre line
setting out curves and recording of central line levels and other required levels
and distances etc. including setting out of Cross Drainage structures with required
reference pillers and marking etc. as directed by Engineer-in-Charge. The setting
out work will be maintaind by the contractor till the completion of work.
A. Reference benchmark/working benchmark (As per drawing annex-I) 18 18 Per no 997.00

B. Reference piller (As per drawing annex-I) 88 88 Per no 583.00
mts mts mts
4 3.4 Excavation, Carting i/c Removal of Unsuitable Soil with Disposal upto 1000 m
Excavation of embankment, sub-grade and drain consisting of excavation, removal and
satisfactory disposal of all excavated materials including hauling to sides of embankment
and subgrade construction as also the disposal of materials in specified manner and the
trimming and finishing of the road to the specified dimensions i/c all lifts, lead upto 1000
meters including dewatering, shaping and excavation in marsh and complete disposal of
all muck as per clause 302. for all types of soil i/c moorum gravel etc. as directed by the
Engineer-in-charge
(I) Cutting of existing embankment (from Calculation Sheet) 3613.163

Average width for cutting of drain = (0.9+0.45)/2 = 0.675 mts
(II) Length of drain = 2 x total length of flexible pavement 8500 0.675 0.450 2581.875
(III) Cutting for CC Pavement 0 4.050 0.300 0.000
(IV) Cutting of CC road drain (total length x 2 x 0.6 x 0.75) 0 0.500 0.300 0.000
6195.038 Cum 44.00
Construction of Embankment with Material Obtained from Roadway Cutting :-
Construction of embankment with approved materials deposited at site from roadway
cutting and excavation from drain and foundation of other structures or from borrow area
5 3.2 (A) graded and compacted using vibratory rollers of 80 to 100 kN static weight to meet
requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 as per Technical Specification Clause 301.5
including, watering rolling etc complete.
(90 % quantity of item no. 3.4 of I only) 0.000 Cum 74.00

Construction of Embankment subgrade & earthen shoulders with Material Obtained
from Borrow Pits :- Construction of embankment, subgrade & earthen shoulders with
approved material obtained from borrow pits i/c all leads and lift and removal of top soil
if any, including cost of land as a source of material, transporting to site, spreading,
6 3.3 (B) graded by motor grader to required slope and compacting using vibratory rollers of 80 to
100 kN static weight to meet requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 including all leads, as
per Technical Specification Clauses 301.4, 301.5, and 303.
Quantity of Filling (from Calculation Sheet ) 16452.713

Quantity for subgrade 30 cm thick (8.68+9.88)= 9.28 mts. 1 0 9.280 0.300 0.000
GSB Shoulder for BT Road 2 0 2.190 0.125 0.000
GSB Shoulder for CC Road 2 0 1.725 0.150 0.000
Superelevation 0.000
16452.713
Deduction for the quantity obtained from cutting of drain 0.000
mts mts mts
16452.713 Cum 148.00

Construction of Embankment subgrade & earthen shoulders with Material Obtained
from Borrow Pits :- Construction of embankment, subgrade & earthen shoulders with
approved material (Select soil having CBR > 7) obtained from borrow pits i/c all leads and
lift and removal of top soil if any, including cost of land as a source of material,
7 3.3 (A) transporting to site, spreading, graded by motor grader to required slope and compacting
using vibratory rollers of 80 to 100 kN static weight to meet requirement of Tables 300.1
and 300.2 including all leads, etc. as per Technical Specification Clauses 301.4, 301.5, and
303.
Quantity for subgrade 30 cm thick (8.68+9.88)= 9.28 mts. 1 4250 9.280 0.300 11832.000
GSB Shoulder for BT Road 2 4250 2.190 0.125 2326.875
GSB Shoulder for CC Road 2 0 1.725 0.150 0.000
Extra for Widening 2% 283.178
14442.053 Cum 180.00
mts mts mts
Granular Sub-base with Well Graded Material (CBR 20 or more) (Table 400.1) :-
Construction of granular sub-base by providing well graded material having CBR >= 20,
spreading in uniform layers with motor grader on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place
8 4.1 method with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with vibratory rollers of 80 to 100 kN
static weight to achieve the desired density, complete as per Technical Specification
Clause 401 for gradings mentioned in table 400.1
(A) Crushed Stone Material

BT Road 1 4250 4.050 0.125 2151.563
CC Road 1 0 4.050 0.150 0.000
Junction Developed 1 160.00 2.18 0.125 43.650
For School 1 100.00 1.30 0.150 19.500
2257.744 Cum 958.00
9 4.7 Water Bound Macadam Sub-base/base with stone screening
WMM Grading : Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded stone aggregate to
wet mix macadam specification including premixing the material with water at OMC in
mechanical mixer (Pug Mill), carriage of mixed material by tipper to site, laying in
uniform layers in sub-base/base
course on a well prepared sub-base and compacting with smooth wheel roller of 80 to
100kN weight to achieve the desired density including lighting, barricating and
maintenance of diversion, etc as per Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical Specification
Clause 406.
4250 3.750 0.150 2390.625
Below CC Pavment 0 3.750 0.075 0.000
Extra for Widening 47.813
Junction Developed 40.00 2.18 0.150 13.095
2451.533 Cum 1618.00
White washing of parapet walls of CD work and tree truncks White washing two coats on
10 10.16 parapet walls and tree trunks including preparation of surface by cleaning scraping etc. as
per technical specifications Clause 1915 10 0.45 1.500 6.750
Tree Paint 14 0.30 1.500 6.300
0.261
0.000
13.311 Sqm 17.00
mts mts mts
Cutting of Trees including Cutting of Trunks, Branches and Removal of Stumps Cutting of
trees, including cutting of trunks, branches and removal of stumps & roots, refilling,
11 2.3 compaction of backfilling and stacking of serviceable material by manual means with all
lifts as per Technical Specification Clause 201.
II 600-900 7 7.000
7.000 Each 383.00
Construction of Shoulders as per Technical Specification Clause 407. : (Hard
Shoulders) :- Construction of shoulder as per clause 407 with selected soil having CBR
12 4.8 value not less than 12 inclusive of all leads and lifts providing 4% camber I/c operations
like watering, rolling and compaction etc. as per clause 303.5
In the length of flexible pavement 2 4250 2.045 0.170 2955.025

In the length of C.C. pavement 2 0 1.875 0.255 0.000
2955.025 Cum 341.00
Prime Coat :- Providing and applying primer coat with bitumen emulsion (SS-1) on
prepared surface of granular base including cleaning of road surface and spraying primer
13 5.1 at the rate of 0.85 kg/sqm using mechanical means as per Technical Specification Clause
502
4250 3.750 15937.500
Junction Developed 160.00 2.18 349.200
16605.450 Sqm 45.00
Tack Coat :- Providing and applying tack coat with Bitumen emulsion (RS-1) using
emulsion distributor at the rate of 0.275 kg per sqm on the prepared granular surfaces
14 5.2 (III) treated with primer & cleaned with Hydraulic broom as per Technical Specification Clause
503.
4250 3.750 15937.500
16605.450 Sqm 12.00
mts mts mts
20mm thick Open-Graded Premix Carpet using Bituminous (penetration

15 5.9 (II) grade/modified bitumen) Binder :-
Providing, laying and rolling of open-graded premix carpet of 20 mm thickness composed
of 13.2 mm size @ 0.18 cum per 10 sqm & 11.2 mm size @ 0.09 cum per 10 sqm
aggregates using penetration grade/modified bitumen @ 14.6 kg/10sqm to required line,
grade and level to serve as wearing course on a previously prepared base, including mixing
in a suitable plant, laying and rolling with a three wheel 80-100 kN static roller capacity,
finished to required level and grades to be followed by seal coat of either Type A , Type B
or Type C as per Technical Specification Clause 508.
(ii) Bitumen (VG-30) 4250 3.750 15937.500

16605.450 Sqm 105.00
Seal Coat :- Providing and laying seal coat sealing the voids in a bituminous surface laid
16 5.12. II (ii) to the specified levels, grade and cross fall using Type A, Type B and Type C as per
Technical Specification Clause 510
Case - II : Type B
(ii) Bitumen (VG-30) 4250 3.750 15937.500
160.00 2.18 349.200
16605.450 Sqm 37.00
Cement Concrete Pavement :- Construction of un-reinforced, dowel jointed at
expansion and construction joint only, plain cement concrete pavement, thickness as per
design, over a prepared sub base, with 43 grade cement or any other type as per Clause
1501.2.2 M30 (Grade), coarse and fine aggregates conforming to IS:383, maximum size of
coarse aggregate not exceeding 25 mm, dowel bars 25mm dia and 500mm long @25cm
17 6.11 c/c or as per design, mixed in a concrete mixer of not less than 0.2 cum capacity and
appropriate weigh batcher using approved mix design, laid in approved fixed side
formwork (steel channel, laying and fixing of 125 micron thick polythene film, wedges,
steel plates including levelling the formwork as per drawing),
mts mts mts
spreading the concrete with shovels, rakes, compacted using needle, screed and plate
vibrators and finished in continuous operation including provision of contraction and
expansion, construction joints, applying debonding strips, primer, sealant, dowel bars, near
approaches to bridge/culvert and construction joints, admixtures as approved, curing of
concrete slabs for 14-days, using curing compound (where specified) and water finishing
to lines and grade as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1501
1 0 3.750 0.180 0.000
For School 1 100.00 1.000 0.180 18.000
18.000 Cum 5011.00
mts mts mts
Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundations complete as per

18 11.4 (II) drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203
(II) P.C.C grade M 15

(i) Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) with 40 mm and down graded metal
C.C Drain in the length of C.C. Road, vertical wall = 2x2xtotal C.C. length 0 0.100 0.300 0.000
Horizontal base = 2xtotal C.C. length 0 0.500 0.100 0.000
0.000 Cum 4110.00
Providing & Laying Non ISI mark Cement Concrete hume Pipe (burried conduits) on first
class bedding of granular material including fixing collar with cement sand mortar 1:2 but
19 9.8 excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling, bedding, concrete and masonary work
in head wall and parapets.
(E) NP2 Pipes 300 mm dia for BT road - 5 no. in each kilometer @200 m
For CC Road 5 no. in each kilometer
(no. of BT road pipe + no. of CC road pipe) - No.s of CDs 21.0 10.00 210.000 Mts 418.00
Providing & Laying ISI mark Cement Concrete hume Pipe (burried conduits) on first class
bedding of granular material including fixing collar with cement sand mortar 1:2 but
excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling, bedding, concrete and masonary work
20 9.8(A)
in head wall and parapets. (A) NP3Pipes 600 mm dia
9.0 10.000 90.000 mts 1927.00

Guard stones :- Providing and fixing guard stones on curves or at any other place as
directed by engineer incharge made of 220 X220X1000 mm hammer dressed stones and
fixed 400mm into the ground in morum and broken agreegates block of size
21 14.10 500X500X500mm and painted with white and black bands in 2 coat with redimix enamel
paint including excavation of pit etc. complete.
82.5 83 Each 453.00
Kilometre Stone : Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade kilometre stone/local stone of
standard design as per IRC:8 fixing in position including painting and printing, etc as per
22 10.6 (A) drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1703
i) 5th Kilometre Stone (precast) 0 Each 3273.00

ii) Ordinary Kilometer Stone (precast) 6 Each 1926.00
iii) 200 m stone (precast) 20 Each 519.00
mts mts mts
23 10.12 Providing and Fixing 'PMGSY Sign board' and 'Logo' of PMGSY Project
(A) PMGSY Sign Board
Providing and fixing of typical PMGSY informatory sign board with Logo as per MORD
specifications and drawing. Three MS Plates of 1.6 mm thick, top and middle plate duly
welded with MS flat iron 25mm x 5m size on back on edges. The lower plate will be
welded with MS angle iron frame of 25mm x 25mm x 5mm. The angle iron frame of the
lower most plate and flat iron frame of middle plate will be welded to 2 nos. 75mm x 75
mm of 12 SWG sheet tubes posts duly embedded in cement concrete M-15 grade blocks of
450mm x 450mm x 600mm, 600mm below ground level. The top most diamond plate
will be welded to middle plate by 47mm x 47mm of 12 SWG steel plate tube. All M.S.
will be stove enameled on both sides. Lettering and printing arrows, border etc. will be
painted with ready mixed synthetic enamel paint of superior quality in required shade and
colour. All sections of framed posts and steel tube will be painted with primer and two
coats of epoxy paint as per drawing Clause 1701 and Annexure 1700.1
1 Each for 5 Km length or its part
1 Each 12467.00
(B) PMGSY Logo Board
Providing and fixing Logo Board of PMGSY size 600×600mm diamond shape with 1
plate of size 900×250 mm made of 16 gauge sheet over frame of angle iron 25×25×3mm
as per PMGSY specifications & drawing, painted with ready mixed synthetic enamel paint
of superior quality in required shade and colour. All sections of framed posts and steel
will be painted with primer and two coats of epoxy paint as per drawing Clause 1701 and
Annexure 1700.1
1 No. Each for 2 Km length or its part
3 Each 3830.00
24 10.13 Providing and Fixing 'citizen's information board' of PMGSY Project

Providing and fixing of typical PMGSY CITIZEN'S INFORMATION BOARD with Logo
as per MORD specifications and drawing, made of 75mm square or 75mm dia. circular
steel tube of 12 SWG 3.2 m hight and cross member 2 Nos. 1m long, fixed with Angle
iron 50 x 50 x 5 mm MS angle on the back side 2Nos vertical and 4 Nos horizontal. It is
mounted by 2 plates of 1.6mm thick and size 900 x 750 mm, the pipe shall be erracted on
600 x 600 x 750 mm foundation blocks at appropriate depth made of cement concrete
1:2:4, painted by standard color as per drawing with lettering, border, heading and logo
etc. using sinthetic enamel paint of superior quality and all details as per standard drawing
of PMGSY including welding, excavation, concreting, painting of base, border and
lettering, painting cross section of road and other required details etc complete as directed
by engineer-in-charge for any type of board wheather for flexible pavement or concrete
pavement as prescribed for PMGSY.
mts mts mts
For B.T. Road one in every 5 KM 1 Each

For C.C. Road one of C.C. potion 0 Each
1 Each 17036.00
25 10.12 (C) Providing and Fixing 'PMGSY Sign board' and 'Logo' of PMGSY Project
(C) Construction of cement concrete PMGSY information board: Construction of
cement concrete PMGSY information board in CC 1:2.5:5 (M15) with skin reinforcement
of 8 mm dia HYSD bars @ 300 mm C/C both ways size (as per drawing annexure-ii)
including excavation, base concrete (M-15), priming, painting two coats synthetic enamel
paint on new concrete surface including painting-figring Logo and Slogen including
writing of all information about the road etc. complete. As directed by the Engineer
incharge.
0 Each 9152.00
mts mts mts
26 10.2 Cautionary, mandatory, informatory, direction and place indentification signs

i) Semi-Reflective Traffic signs more than 0.90 sqm size board
Providing and erecting cautionary, mandatory, informatory, direction and place
identification of semi reflective sign boards as per IRC-67 made of 2 mm thick M.S.
Sheet duly stove enameled paint white colour in front and grey colour on back with
reflective border of 70 mm width and required message, letters, figures with reflective tape
of engineering grade as per MORD specifications of required shade and colour. Supported
and welded on two nos. 47 mm x 47 mm of 12 SWG square tube of 3050 mm height duly
strengthened by 25 mm x 5 mm MS flat iron on edges on back firmly fixed to the ground
by means of properly designed foundations with M-15 grade cement concrete 450 mm x
450 mm x 600 mm, 600 mm below ground level as per approved drawing and Technical
Specification Clause 1701
10.800 sqm 5349.00
ii) Semi-Reflective Traffic signs up to 0.90 sqm size board
Providing and erecting cautionary, mandatory, informatory, direction and place
identification of semi reflective sign boards as per IRC-67 made of 2 mm thick M.S.
Sheet duly stove enameled paint white colour in front and grey colour on back with
reflective border of 70 mm width and required message, letters, figures with reflective tape
of engineering grade as per MORD specifications of required shade and colour. Supported
and welded on 47 mm x 47 mm of 12 SWG square tube of 3050 mm height duly
strengthened by 25 mm x 5 mm MS flat iron on edges on back firmly fixed to the ground
by means of properly designed foundations with M-15 grade cement concrete 450 mm x
27 450 mm x 600 mm, 600 mm below ground level as per approved drawing and Technical
Specification Clause 1701
(A) 900 mm equilateral & triangle 0 Each 3188.00

(B) 600 mm Circular 4 Each 3027.00
(C ) 800 mm x 600 mm rectangular 6 Each 3500.00
(D) 600 mm x 450 mm rectangular 5 Each 2996.00
(E) 600 mm equilateral & triangle 3 Each 2722.00
DPR Consultancy fee 4.250 Km 11600.00
mts mts mts
Speed Breaker
Providing and laying rounded hump type of Speed Breaker confirming to IRC – 99 and as
per guidelines and drawings of NRRDA circular no. DO No. P-17019/6/2006/PII Dated 16
Sept 2009, including providing, laying and compaction of GSB, G II, G III, OGPC, Seal
Coat Type B, as per specifications and appended drawing on both the sides of carriage way
10.14 up to formation width maintaining rounded hump type shape with bituminous mix
28 material i/c providing and painting of black and white strips, providing and fixing of two
(B)
no. 600mm equilateral semi reflecting sign boards, i/c cost of all materials, labour T & P &
Machinery etc complete and as directed by engineer in charge as per relevant clauses of
MORD specifications.
5 5 Each 23659.00
TOTAL COST OF THE FLEXIBLE AND CEMENT CONCRETE ITEM
29 Inauguration & Foundation stone laying ceremony, LS
30 Pole Shifting (LT Line)

1.000 Each 90000.00
31 Pole Shifting (HT Line)
0.000 Each 120000.00
Note:- Cost of ESMF is = Sr.no 19+20+21+26+27(A,B,C,D,E)+28
TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT ROAD

Diff. cost of hard shoulder and Earthen Shoulder - rate diff. of H/S & E/S
32 2955.025 Cum 0
Higher Specification Cost = (i) Rate of Primer (45) + Tack coat (12) +OGPC
(105)+ Seal coat (37) = Rs. 199/Sqm & (ii) Rate of Primer (45) +Surface
33 Dressing -I (71 )+ Surface dressing (62) = Rs. 178/Sqm Higher Specification 16605.450 Sqm 0
Cost = Rs. 199-178 = Rs. 21
34 Inauguration & Foundation stone laying ceremony, LS
35 Pole Shifting (LT Line) 1.000 Each 90000

36 Pole Shifting (HT Line) 0.000 Each 120000
Total State Share Cost
mts mts mts
TOTAL COST OF THE GOI
COST SUMMRY OF THE ROAD ESTIMATE TOTAL COST COST IN LACS COST PER KM
A TOTAL COST OF FLEXIBLE PAYMENT

18536805.28 185.37 43.62
B TOTAL COST OF CC PAYMENT
101021.76 1.01 0.24
C COST OF INAUGURATION AND STATE COST
106400.00 1.06 0.25
GRANT TOTAL 18744227.04 187.44 44.10

Format F-6
Rural Roads under MPRCP
Development, Govt. of India)
FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION
oad Estimate
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
86633.00 97028.96
0.00 0.00
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
17946.00 20099.52
51304.00 57460.48
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
272582.00 305291.84
0.00 0.00
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
2435001.00 2727201.12
2599569.00 2911517.28
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
2162919.00 2422469.28
3966580.00 4442569.60
226.00 253.12
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
2681.00 3002.72
1007664.00 1128583.68
747245.00 836914.40
199265.00 223176.80
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
1743572.00 1952800.64
614402.00 688130.24
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
90198.00 101021.76
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
0.00 0.00
87780.00 98313.60
173430.00 194241.60
37373.00 41857.76
0.00 0.00
11556.00 12942.72
10380.00 11625.60
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
12467.00 13963.04
11490.00 12868.80
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
17036.00 19080.32
0.00 0.00
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
57769.00 64701.28
0.00 0.00
12108.00 13560.96
21000.00 23520.00
14980.00 16777.60
8166.00 9145.92
49300.00 55216.00
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
118295.00 132490.40
16640917 18637827
5000 5600.00
90000.00 100800.00
0.00 0.00
16735917 18744227
0 0
0 0
5000 5600
90000 100800
0 0
95000 106400
Amount Amount
Without With GST 12
GST %
16640917 18637827
Protection wall Estimate
Package No Block :- Sitamau Distt.-
Name of Road : ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana Total Length.
SSR Item
S.No. Description No L B D/H Qty.
No
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Protection wall / Toe wall
Earthwork in excavation for foundation of structures as per
drawing and technical specification Clause 1104 including
setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of
stumps and other deleterious matter, dressing of sides and
bottom, sorting out serviceable & unserviceable materials
and disposal of all materials up to 1000 m lead and
backfilling with approved material.(A) Ordinary soil. Ch-
1 SOR 9.1
250-260 1 10.00 1.37 1.60 21.8666667

450-460 1 10.00 1.37 1.60 21.8666667
1750-1760 1 10.00 1.37 1.60 21.8666667
Total 65.6
Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open
foundations complete as per drawings and technical
specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203 (II) P.C.C grade
M 15 Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) with 40 mm and down graded
metal
250-260 1 10.00 1.37 0.1 1.36666667

450-460 1 10.00 1.37 0.1 1.36666667
SOR 11.4 1750-1760 1 10.00 1.37 0.1 1.36666667
2
(II)
250-260 1 10.00 0.7333333 2 14.6666667
450-460 1 10.00 0.7333333 2 14.6666667
1750-1760 1 10.00 0.7333333 2 14.6666667
250-260 1 10.00 0.6 0.4 2.4
450-460 1 10.00 0.6 0.4 2.4
1750-1760 1 10.00 0.6 0.4 2.4
Total 55.3
Filling in foundation trenches as per drawing and technical
specification Clause 305.3.9 (II) Granular material filling
250-260 1 10.00 0.825 8.25

SOR
3
11.2(ii) 450-460 1 10.00 0.825 8.25
1750-1760 1 10.00 0.825 8.25
Total 24.75
Providing weep holes in brick masonry/stone masonry,
plain/reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return wall
with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of
the structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards drawing face
complete as per drawing and technical specification Clauses
614, 709, 1204.3.7
4 SOR 12.9
250-260 4 0.8 3.2
450-460 4 0.8 3.2
1750-1760 4 0.8 3.2
Total 9.6
With 12 % GST Total Cost in Lacs
Mandsaur
4.25 KM
Unit Rate Amount
9 10 11
Cum
Cum
Cum
195 12792
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum 4110 227283
Cum
Cum
Cum
405 10023.75
149 1430.4
With 12 % GST Total Cost in Lacs 2.82
Existing Culvert Wearing Coarse Estimate
Package No Block :- Sitamau Distt.-
SSR Item
S.No. Description No L B D/H Qty.
No
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Providing and laying cement concrete wearing coat M-30
Grade I/C reinforcement complete as genaral Note, drawing
and technical specification clauses 800 & 1206.30
1 SOR-13.5
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
- 1 0 7.5 0.075 0
With 12 % GST Total Cost in Lacs

Mandsaur
4.25 KM
Rate
Unit Amount
9 10 11
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
Cum 9510 0
2 % GST Total Cost in Lacs 0.00

Dismentling of Existing Stone Masonary Culvert Sampl
Package No Block :- Sitamau
SSR Item
S.No. Description No L
No
1 2 3 4 5
A. Miscellenous work
1 2.5 (B) Dismantling of Structures
Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges,
retaining walls and other structure comprising of cement
concrete including T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary,
sorting the dismantled material, disposal of unserviceable
material and stacking the serviceable material with all lifts
and lead of 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause
202.
(B) Cement Concrete
(B) M-30 0 12.00

Incasing concrete and appron of structure 0 12.00
Total
2 2.6 b) Dismantling Brick/Stone Masonry, stone pitching
Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges,

retaining walls and other structures comprising of brick/stone
masonry, including disposal of unserviceable material and
stacking the serviceable material with all lift and lead of 1000
m as per Technical Specification Clause 202.
b) Stone masonary
ii) Cement Mortar
(A) Headwall 0 12.00

0 12.00
Total
3 2.7 (B) Removing all types of Hume pipes and stacking including
Earthwork and Dismantling of Masonry Works as per
Technical Specification Clause 202. 0 7.50
(B) Above 600 mm to 900 mm dia Hume pipe
With 12 % GST To
onary Culvert Sample Estimate
Sitamau Distt.- Mandsaur
4.25 KM
B D/H Qty. Unit Rate Amount

6 7 8 9 10 11
7.50 0.250 0.00

7.50 0.900 0.00
0.00 cum 419.00 0.00
0.90 1.650 0.00

0.90 1.650 0.00
0.00 cum 228.00 0.00
0.00 0.000 0.00 m 230.00 0.00
With 12 % GST Total Cost in Lacs 0.00

MUKYA MANTRY GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)
COST ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
(CULVERTS AND MINOR BRIDGES)
Road : Ch :
Slab Culvert 6 x 4 x 1 Sp
S.
SSR No. Description of Item No. Length Width Depth
No.
1 11.1- I -(i) Excavation
Earthwork in excavation for structures as per drawing and

technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out,
construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and
other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m,
dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with
excavated suitable material. Ordinary soil Upto 1.5 m depth
Abutment 2 10.500 4.050 1.100

Wing 4 5.000 3.710 1.320
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 1.000
2 11.1- II Excavation
excavated suitable material. Ordinary rock (not requiring
blasting) Upto 3 m depth
Abutment 2 10.500 4.050 0.900
Wing 4 5.000 3.710 0.900
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 0.970
3 11.4-I-(i) CC M - 10
specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203
Abutment 2 10.500 4.050 0.200
Wing 4 5.000 3.710 0.200
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 0.200
4 11.4-II-(i) CC M - 15
Abutment 2 9.300 3.250 1.600
Wing 4 5.000 2.910 1.600
Piers 0 9.300 1.800 1.600
5 12.5-II-(i) CC M - 15
Plain/reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as
per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805,
806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Abutment 2 7.900 1.700 4.000
wing 4 5.000 1.493 4.000
wing 4 0.667 1.493 4.000
wing 4 1.333 0.513 0.680
Parapet wall 2 20.067 0.400 0.400
Piers Rectangular Part 0 7.500 1.000 4.000
PiersCircular Part 0 0.793 4.000
6 12.5-IV-(i) RCC M - 20
806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Cap 2 7.500 0.700 0.200
Dirtwall 2 7.500 0.300 0.480
Pier Cap 0 7.500 0.900 0.200
7 13.1-II RCC M - 25
Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in
superstructure as per drawing and technical specifications
Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5
Slab 1 7.500 6.800 0.480
8 12.6 Steel Surface Reinforcement

Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement (Fe 415)
in substructrue complete as per drawings and technical
specification Clauses 1002, 1005, 1010 & 1202
Abutment 1 2.000 9.300 1.789
1 2.000 7.900 4.055
Wing 1 4.000 2.910 1.600
1 4.000 1.493 0.680
1 4.000 5.000 1.789
1 4.000 5.667 4.020
1 4.000 6.333 0.680
Cap & Dirtwall (Abutment) 1 4.260 0.009 7.850

Pier Cap 0 0.000 0.009 7.850
Sub Total
Up to Pier Cap Bottom 0 9.300 1.600 0.000
0 1.800 1.600 0.000
0 7.500 4.000 0.000
0 1.000 4.000 0.000
0 3.768 4.000 0.000
Half Pier Area Sqm 0.000
Total Pier Area 2 Sqm 0
8mm dia steel 200mmc/c both way or 3.95 kg/sqm
Total Steel
9 13.2
Supplying, fitting, and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in
superstructure complete as per drawing and technical
specifications Clauses 1002, 1010 and 1202
Singal Span (Slab)
Total (Slab) 1
Anchor bar for RCC slabs of submersible bridges -
Providng and fixing 20mm dia MS anchor bar duly welded at
10 12.15 bottom with MS plate of size 500mm x 75mm x 10mm including
all material labour charges etc. as per plate no. 7.22 SP-20 or
otherwise as directed by Engineer incharge.
A Fixed end anchor bar 1 4
B Free end anchor bar 1 4
11 12.9 Weep Holes

Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry,
plain/reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return wall with
100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of the
structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards drawing face
614, 709, 1204.3.7
Abutment 2 4 7
Wing 4 4 5
12 13.16(II) 25mm Expansion Joint

Providing and fixing 25 mm thick compressible fibre board in
expansion joint complete as per drawing and technical
specifications
2 7.5 0.48
13 12.11 Filter Media

Providing and laying filter media with granular crushed
aggregates as per specification to a thickness of not less than
600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size
towards the wall and providing over the entire surface behind
abutment, wing wall, return wall to the full height, compacted to
firm condition complete as per drawing and technical
specification Clause 1204.3.8
Abutment 2 5.847 0.6 3.4
Wing 4 4.913 0.6 3.4
Total A
Amount (in
With
GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)
al Development, Govt. of India)
STRUCTION OF CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
S AND MINOR BRIDGES)
6 x 4 x 1 Span
Qty. Rate Unit Amount
93.555
97.944
0.000
191.499 195.00 Cu.m. 37342
76.545
66.780
0.000
143.325 262.00 Cu.m. 37551
17.010
14.840
0.000
31.850 4077.00 Cu.m. 129852
96.720
93.120
0.000
189.840 4110.00 Cu.m. 780242
107.440
119.467
15.929
1.862
6.421
0.000
0.000
251.119 4347.00 Cu.m. 1091612
2.100
2.160
0.000
0.000
4.260 4898.00 Cu.m. 20865
24.480 5622.00 Cu.m. 137627
33.273
64.072
18.624
4.062
35.777
91.119
17.227
264.153
1.043
0.301
0.000
1.344
0.000
1.344 46354.00 Mt 62317
1.336
1.336 46354.00 Mt 61929
4.00 425.00 each 1700

4.00 861.00 each 3444
56
80
136 149.00 Mt 20264
7.2 674.00 Sqm 4853

23.854
40.093
63.947 995.00 Cum 63627
Total Amount : 2453227

Amount (in Rs. Lacs) : 24.53
With GST 27.48
Road : Ch :
S.
No.

Abutment 2 9.900 2.950 0.900

Wing 4 5.000 2.667 1.080
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 1.000
Abutment 2 9.900 2.950 0.900
Wing 4 5.000 2.667 0.900
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 0.970
3 11.4-I-(i) CC M - 10
Abutment 2 9.900 2.950 0.200
Wing 4 5.000 2.667 0.200
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 0.200
4 11.4-II-(i) CC M - 15
Abutment 2 8.800 2.200 1.400
Wing 4 5.000 1.917 1.400
Piers 0 9.300 1.800 1.400
5 12.5-II-(i) CC M - 15
806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Abutment 2 7.700 1.200 2.000
wing 4 5.000 0.983 2.000
wing 4 0.333 0.983 2.000
wing 4 0.667 0.475 0.450
Parapet wall 2 14.733 0.400 0.400
6 12.5-IV-(i) RCC M - 20
806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Cap 2 7.500 0.700 0.200
Dirtwall 2 7.500 0.300 0.250
Pier Cap 0 7.500 0.900 0.200
7 13.1-II RCC M - 25
Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5
Slab 1 7.500 2.800 0.250

Abutment 1 2.000 8.800 1.565
1 2.000 7.700 2.028
Wing 1 4.000 1.917 1.400
1 4.000 0.983 0.450
1 4.000 5.000 1.565
1 4.000 5.333 2.010
1 4.000 5.667 0.450

Pier Cap 0 0.000 0.009 7.850
Sub Total
0 1.800 1.400 0.000
0 7.500 2.000 0.000
0 1.000 2.000 0.000
0 3.768 2.000 0.000
Total Steel
9 13.2
Singal Span (Slab)
Total (Slab) 1
11 12.9 Weep Holes

614, 709, 1204.3.7
Abutment 2 2 7
Wing 4 2 5

specifications
2 7.5 0.25

Abutment 2 6.000 0.6 1.4
Wing 4 4.875 0.6 1.4
Total A
Amount (in
With
2 x 2 x 1 Span
52.569
57.600
0.000
110.169 195.00 Cu.m. 21483
52.569
48.000
0.000
100.569 262.00 Cu.m. 26349
11.682
10.667
0.000
22.349 4077.00 Cu.m. 91116
54.208
53.667
0.000
107.875 4110.00 Cu.m. 443365
36.960
39.333
2.622
0.570
4.715
0.000
0.000
84.200 4347.00 Cu.m. 366018
2.100
1.125
0.000
0.000
3.225 4898.00 Cu.m. 15796
5.250 5622.00 Cu.m. 29516
27.548
31.225
10.733
1.770
31.305
42.879
10.200
155.661
0.615
0.228
0.000
0.843
0.000
0.843 46354.00 Mt 39063
0.272
0.272 46354.00 Mt 12608
4.00 425.00 each 1700

4.00 861.00 each 3444
28
40
68 149.00 Mt 10132
3.75 674.00 Sqm 2528

10.080
16.380
26.460 995.00 Cum 26328

With GST 12.20
Road : Ch :
S.
No.

Abutment 2 9.900 2.950 0.900

Wing 4 5.000 2.687 1.080
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 1.000
Abutment 2 9.900 2.950 0.900
Wing 4 5.000 2.687 0.900
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 0.970
3 11.4-I-(i) CC M - 10
Abutment 2 9.900 2.950 0.200
Wing 4 5.000 2.687 0.200
Piers 0 10.400 2.900 0.200
4 11.4-II-(i) CC M - 15
Abutment 2 8.800 2.200 1.400
Wing 4 5.000 1.937 1.400
Piers 0 9.300 1.800 1.400
5 12.5-II-(i) CC M - 15
806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Abutment 2 7.700 1.200 2.000
wing 4 5.000 1.003 2.000
wing 4 0.333 1.003 2.000
wing 4 0.667 0.485 0.510
Parapet wall 2 15.733 0.400 0.400
6 12.5-IV-(i) RCC M - 20
806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Cap 2 7.500 0.700 0.200
Dirtwall 2 7.500 0.300 0.310
Pier Cap 0 7.500 0.900 0.200
7 13.1-II RCC M - 25
Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5
Slab 1 7.500 3.800 0.310

Abutment 1 2.000 8.800 1.565
1 2.000 7.700 2.028
Wing 1 4.000 1.937 1.400
1 4.000 1.003 0.510
1 4.000 5.000 1.565
1 4.000 5.333 2.010
1 4.000 5.667 0.510

Pier Cap 0 0.000 0.009 7.850
Sub Total
0 1.800 1.400 0.000
0 7.500 2.000 0.000
0 1.000 2.000 0.000
0 3.768 2.000 0.000
Total Steel
9 13.2
Singal Span (Slab)
Total (Slab) 1
11 12.9 Weep Holes

614, 709, 1204.3.7
Abutment 2 2 7
Wing 4 2 5

specifications
2 7.5 0.31

Abutment 2 5.960 0.6 1.4
Wing 4 4.885 0.6 1.4
Total A
Amount (in
With
3 x 2 x 1 Span
52.569
58.032
0.000
110.601 195.00 Cu.m. 21567
52.569
48.360
0.000
100.929 262.00 Cu.m. 26443
11.682
10.747
0.000
22.429 4077.00 Cu.m. 91442
54.208
54.227
0.000
108.435 4110.00 Cu.m. 445666
36.960
40.133
2.676
0.660
5.035
0.000
0.000
85.463 4347.00 Cu.m. 371508
2.100
1.395
0.000
0.000
3.495 4898.00 Cu.m. 17119
8.835 5622.00 Cu.m. 49670
27.548
31.225
10.845
2.047
31.305
42.879
11.560
157.410
0.622
0.247
0.000
0.869
0.000
0.869 46354.00 Mt 40267
0.448
0.448 46354.00 Mt 20767
4.00 425.00 each 1700

4.00 861.00 each 3444
28
40
68 149.00 Mt 10132
4.65 674.00 Sqm 3134

10.013
16.414
26.426 995.00 Cum 26294

With GST 12.65
Cost Estimate for Construction of Cross Drainage Works
Estimate for Hume Pipe Culvert with 1 pipe of 1000 mm diameter
Chainage
SOR
S No Particulars No. of Nos
Item L W D Qty. Unit
Culvert
Excavation for Structures
bottom, sorting out serviceable & unserviceable materials and
disposal of all materials up to 1000 m lead and backfilling
with approved material.
1 9.1 (A) Ordinary soil

(i) Upto 1.5 m depth
Below pipe 0 1 8.39 1.73 0.20 0.00
Face wall 0 2 6.35 1.60 1.07 0.00
0.00 Cum
(B) Ordinary rock (not requiring blasting)
Upto 3 m depth
Face wall 0 2 6.35 1.60 0.25 0.00 Cum
Plain Cement Concrete M10 (1:3:6 nominal mix) in leveling
course below open foundation of Head walls as per drawings
11.4 I ( i & Technical Specification Clause 1109
2
) Nominal mix 1:3:6
Leveling course below face wall 0 2 6.35 1.60 0.15 0.00 Cum
per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804,
805, 806, 807, 1202 and 1204

(i) Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)
3 12.5(II)I Face wall (1.40+0.4)/2=) 0.9 0
2 6.15 0.90 3.00 0.00
Chainage
SOR
S 3No 12.5(II)I Particulars No. of Nos
Culvert
Parapet wall 0 2 6.15 0.40 0.60 0.00
Total 0.00
Deduct for pipe = 2x(3.14/4)x(1.232)x(1.01+0.6)/2 0
0.00
0.00 Cum
Chainage
SOR
Culvert
Backfilling in Foundation Trenches as per drawing and 0
technical specification Clause 1108 2 6.15 0.20 1.17 0.00
4 9.16 (ii)
0 2 6.15 0.10 1.17 0.00
0.00 Cum
Bedding for pipe
Type A (Concrete cradle) Bedding
5 9.2 (i) Laying Concrete cradle bedding with well M15 grade cement
as per clause 1105 (i) PCC M-15 (Nominal Mix 1:2.5:5)
0 1 8.39 1.73 0.15 0.00 Cum

Providing and Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP3
(ISI Mark) as per design
Providing and laying ISI mark reinforced cement concrete

Hume pipe NP3 for culverts on first class bedding of granular
6 9.3 (B) material in single row including jointing with cement mortar
1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling,
bedding, concrete and masonry works in head walls and
parapets Clause 1106.
(B) 1000 mm die 0 1 10.00 0.00 Mts.

White Washing of parapet walls of CD work
White washing two coats on parapet walls and tree trunks
including preparation of surface by cleaning scraping etc. as
per technical specifications Clause 1915
wall outer sides 0 2 6.15 1.83 0.00

7 10.16 Both ends (0.40 + 1.40)/2 0 4 0.90 1.83 0.00
top 0 2 6.15 0.40 0.00
Face wall above road top 0
4 6.15 0.60 0.00
Side of face wall above road top 0
4 0.40 0.60 0.00
Total 0.00 sqm

Chainage
SOR
Culvert
Apron
8 9.1 with approved material.
U/S 0 1 3.00 6.15 0.30 0.00 Cum

D/S 0 1 2.28 6.15 0.30 0.00 Cum
Toe wall & Bolder Portion 0 1 10.71 0.90 0.40 0.00 Cum
Total Total 0.00 Cum
& Technical Specification Clause 1109 (For Toe wall Base)
9 11.4(i)
D/S 0 1 10.71 0.80 0.10 0.00 Cum

P.C.C grade M 15
Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) with 40 mm and down graded metal

10 11.4(ii)
( for slab of Apron) (For Toe Wall)
D/S 0 1 10.71 0.60 0.60 0.00 Cum
Providing and Laying Apron with Stone Boulders as per
Drawings & Technical (Specification Clause 1301) Providing
and laying boulder apron for bed protection with stone
boulders of minimum size and weight as per Table 1300.1, no
fragment weighing less than 25 kg laid dry complete as per
drawing and technical specifications Clause 1301 (Weight of
11 7.6(i)
stone 25 kg minimum)
U/S 0 1 3.00 6.15 0.30 0.00 Cum

D/S 0 1 2.28 6.15 0.30 0.00 Cum
Total 0.00 Cum
Total Cost
Chainage
SOR
Culvert
Say (Rs. Lakhs)
With GST (Rs. Lakhs)
Rate
(Rs.) Amt (Rs.)
195 0
328 0
4077 0
Rate
(Rs.) Amt (Rs.)
4347 0
Rate
(Rs.) Amt (Rs.)
170 0
4110 0
4975 0
17 0
Rate
(Rs.) Amt (Rs.)
195 0
4077 0
4110 0
886.00 0
Total Cost 0.00
Rate
(Rs.) Amt (Rs.)
Say (Rs. Lakhs) 0.00
h GST (Rs. Lakhs) 0.00
Estimate for Hume Pipe Culvert with 1 pipe of 1000 mm diameter
2200
Chainage
SOR No. of
S No Particulars Nos
Item Culvert
Rate Amt
Length Width D/H Qty. Unit (Rs.) (Rs.)
backfilling with approved material.
1 9.1
(A) Ordinary soil
Below pipe 1 1 5.89 1.73 0.20 2.04
Face wall 1 2 6.35 1.60 1.07 21.74
23.78 Cum 195 4637
Upto 3 m depth
Face wall 1 2 6.35 1.60 0.25 5.08 Cum 328 1666
course below open foundation of Head walls as per
11.4 I drawings & Technical Specification Clause 1109
2
( i)
Nominal mix 1:3:6
Leveling course below face wall 1 2 6.35 1.60 0.15 3.05 Cum 4077 12427
per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804,
805, 806, 807, 1202 and 1204
3 12.5(II)I Face wall (1.40+0.4)/2=) 0.9 1 2 6.15 0.90 3.00 33.21
Parapet wall 1 2 6.15 0.40 0.60 2.95

Total 36.16
Deduct for pipe = 2x(3.14/4)x(1.232)x(1.01+0.6)/2 1 1.91
3 12.5(II)I 2200
Chainage
SOR No. of
Item Culvert
Rate Amt
34.25 Cum 4347 148885
Backfilling in Foundation Trenches as per drawing and 1
technical specification Clause 1108
4 9.16 (ii) 2 6.15 0.20 1.17 2.81
1 2 6.15 0.10 1.17 1.44
4.25 Cum 170 722
Bedding for pipe
5 9.2 (i) Laying Concrete cradle bedding with well M15 grade
cement as per clause 1105 (i) PCC M-15 (Nominal Mix
1:2.5:5)
1 1 5.89 1.73 0.15 1.53 Cum 4110 6282
Providing and Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe
NP3 (ISI Mark) as per design
Hume pipe NP3 for culverts on first class bedding of
6 9.3 (B) granular material in single row including jointing with
cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection
works, backfilling, bedding, concrete and masonry works in
head walls and parapets Clause 1106.
(B) 1000 mm die 1 1 7.50 7.50 Mts. 4975 37313

wall outer sides 1 2 6.15 1.83 22.51
7 10.16 Both ends (0.40 + 1.40)/2 1 4 0.90 1.83 6.59
top 1 2 6.15 0.40 4.92
Face wall above road top 1
4 6.15 0.60 14.76
Side of face wall above road top 1 4 0.40 0.60 0.96
Total 49.74 sqm 17 846
2200
Chainage
SOR No. of
Item Culvert
Rate Amt
Apron
backfilling with approved material.
8 9.1
U/S 1 1 3.00 6.15 0.30 5.54 Cum

D/S 1 1 2.28 6.15 0.30 4.21 Cum
Toe wall & Bolder Portion 1 1 10.71 0.90 0.40 3.86 Cum
Total Total 13.60 Cum 195 2651
& Technical Specification Clause 1109 (For Toe wall
9 11.4(i) Base)
D/S 1 1 10.71 0.80 0.10 0.86 Cum 4077 3493

P.C.C grade M 15
Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) with 40 mm and down graded metal (

10 11.4(ii) for slab of Apron) (For Toe Wall)
D/S 1 1 10.71 0.60 0.60 3.86 Cum 4110 15847

Drawings & Technical (Specification Clause 1301)
Providing and laying boulder apron for bed protection with
stone boulders of minimum size and weight as per Table
1300.1, no fragment weighing less than 25 kg laid dry
complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clause
11 7.6(i)
1301 (Weight of stone 25 kg minimum)
U/S 1 1 3.00 6.15 0.30 5.54 Cum

D/S 1 1 2.28 6.15 0.30 4.21 Cum
Total 9.74 Cum 886 8631
Total Cost 243400
2200
Chainage
SOR No. of
Item Culvert
Rate Amt
With GST (Rs. Lakhs) 2.726
Estimate for Hume Pipe Culvert with 2R pipe of 1000 mm diameter
840 3800
Chainage
SOR No. of
S No Particulars
Item Culvert
Nos L W D Qty.
1 9.1
(A) Ordinary soil
Below pipe 2 1 5.89 3.46 0.20 8.15
Face wall 2 2 8.08 1.60 1.07 55.33
63.48
Upto 3 m depth
Face wall 2 2 8.08 1.60 0.25 12.93
& Technical Specification Clause 1109
2 11.4 I ( i )
Nominal mix 1:3:6
Leveling course below face wall 2 2 8.08 1.60 0.15 7.76
806, 807, 1202 and 1204
3 12.5(II)I
840 3800
Chainage
SOR No. of
S No Particulars
Item Culvert
Nos L W D Qty.
3 12.5(II)I Face wall (1.40+0.4)/2=) 0.9 2 2 7.88 0.90 3.00 85.10
Parapet wall 2 2 7.88 0.40 0.60 7.56

Total 92.67
Deduct for pipe = 2x(3.14/4)x(1.232)x(1.01+0.6)/2 2 3.82
88.84
840 3800
Chainage
SOR No. of
S No Particulars
Item Culvert
Nos L W D Qty.
Backfilling in Foundation Trenches as per drawing and
technical specification Clause 1108 2
4 9.16 (ii) 2 7.88 0.20 1.17 7.19
2 2 7.88 0.10 1.17 3.69
10.88
Bedding for pipe
Laying Concrete cradle bedding with well M15 grade cement
5 9.2 (i) as per clause 1105 (i) PCC M-15 (Nominal Mix 1:2.5:5)
2 1 5.89 3.46 0.15 6.11

Providing and Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP3
(ISI Mark) as per design

Hume pipe NP3 for culverts on first class bedding of granular
6 9.3 (B) material in single row including jointing with cement mortar
1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling,
bedding, concrete and masonry works in head walls and
parapets Clause 1106.
(B) 1000 mm die 2 2 7.50 30.00

wall outer sides 2 2 7.88 1.83 57.68

7 10.16
Both ends (0.40 + 1.40)/2 2 4 0.90 1.83 13.18
top 2 2 7.88 0.40 12.61
Face wall above road top 2 4 7.88 0.60 37.82
Side of face wall above road top
2
4 0.40 0.60 1.92
7 10.16
840 3800
Chainage
SOR No. of
S No Particulars
Item Culvert
Nos L W D Qty.
Total 123.21
840 3800
Chainage
SOR No. of
S No Particulars
Item Culvert
Nos L W D Qty.
Apron
8 9.1
U/S 2 1 3.00 7.85 0.30 14.13

D/S 2 1 2.28 7.85 0.30 10.74
Toe wall & Bolder Portion 2 1 12.41 0.90 0.40 8.94
Total Total 33.80
course below open foundation of Head walls as per drawings &
Technical Specification Clause 1109 (For Toe wall Base)
9 11.4(i)
D/S 2 1 12.41 0.80 0.100 1.99

P.C.C grade M 15
Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) with 40 mm and down graded metal
10 11.4(ii) ( for slab of Apron) (For Toe Wall)
D/S 2 1 12.41 0.60 0.60 8.94
Drawings & Technical (Specification Clause 1301) Providing
and laying boulder apron for bed protection with stone
boulders of minimum size and weight as per Table 1300.1, no
fragment weighing less than 25 kg laid dry complete as per
drawing and technical specifications Clause 1301 (Weight of
11 7.6(i) stone 25 kg minimum)
840 3800
Chainage
SOR No. of
S11
No 7.6(i) Particulars
Item Culvert
Nos L W D Qty.
U/S 2 1 3.00 7.85 0.30 14.13
D/S 2 1 2.28 7.85 0.30 10.74
Total 24.87
Total
Say (Rs. La
With GST (Rs. La
Rate Amt
Unit
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Cum 195 12379
Cum 328 4240
Cum 4077 31624

Rate Amt
Unit
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Cum 4347 386208

Rate Amt
Unit
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Cum 170 1849
Cum 4110 25128
Mts. 4975 149250

Rate Amt
Unit
(Rs.) (Rs.)
sqm 17 2095
Rate Amt
Unit
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Cum
Cum
Cum
Cum 195 6592
Cum 4077 8095
Cum 4110 36724

Rate Amt
Unit
(Rs.) (Rs.)
Cum
Cum
Cum 886.00 22034
Total Cost 686217
With GST (Rs. Lakhs) 7.686
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA [ P.M.G.S.Y. ]
ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS UNDER P.M.G.S.Y.
(DESIGN AND DETAILING OF CURVE PORTIONS)
NAME OF ROAD ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana

DISTRICT:- Mandsaur BLOCK:- Sitamau LENGTH (km):- 4.25
Super Elevation Extra Widening

Final
Transiti
Radius Length Volume Transiti Transiti Transiti
Angle Curve Area of on
Chainage Deflecti of Curve of Design of Width on on on
w.r.t. Directio Widened Length
in meter on angle in Circular Speed Provided Elevated in Length Length Length
North n Surface (m) =
meters Curve Surface meter
in Sq.m. 1 2 3
in Cu.m. Max of
1,2,3
0 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75

100 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
200 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
300 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
400 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
600 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
800 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
900 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
1200 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
1500 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
1800 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
2000 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
2200 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
2400 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
2500 0 Left 200 0.00 50 0.056 0.00 0 0 21.00 15.63 33.75 33.75
0.00 0
MP Rural Road Development Authority, Bhopal (M.P.)
Year : 2017-2018 (as per SSR w.e.f. 01.09.2017)
Currently beneficiary villages
TOTAL have to travel km distance for
PROJECT Total Beneficiary this facility
S. Name of Name of Name of Name of the Beneficiary
COST Populati Village
No. District PIU Block Road Total Village
(Rs.in on Population Bus or
Length (in Lakh) High
Railway
kms) School
Station
(7+8+9)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13
Lodakheda 813.00 25.00 25.00
Ramnagar 256.00 28.50 28.50
ANANDDHAM Dhankhedi 1004.00 30.00 30.00
1 Mandsaur Mandsaur Sitamau (Ghasoi) To 4.25 256.86 8445 Dhanwada 925.00 35.00 35.00
Gelana
Gelana 1861.00 24.00 24.00
Dhabladeval 2136.00 35.00 35.00
Dhaturiya 1450.00 32.00 32.00
4.25 256.86 8445.00 8445.00
CP
M.P.)
7)
beneficiary villages Beneficiary villages have to
avel km distance for travel just km distance after
this facility proposed road for this facility
Remark
Bus or
Medical High Medical
Railway
Facility School Facility
Station
18 20 21 24 25
25.00 17.00 17.00 17.00
28.50 18.50 18.50 18.50
Therefore, it is
30.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 evident that the
35.00 27.00 27.00 27.00 beneficiary get both
time and economic
24.00 14.00 14.00 14.00
benefit from the
35.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 proposed road.
32.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
Format-9(A)
RURAL ROADS: ENVIRONMETNAL CHECKLIST
Road Name.- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Block Name:- Sitamau
District Name:- Mandsaur
Total length of the road:- :- 4.25 km
A.) Climatic Conditions :- The climate of this district is generally dry except in south-west monsoon. Year may be divid
into four seasons. The cold season is from December to February. This is followed by the hot season from March to th
middle of June. Thereafter the south-west monsoon season starts and continues up to about the middle of September.
The average annual rainfall in the District is 786.6 mm. The rainfall in the districts in the region round about Sitamau-
Mandsaur- Malhargarh, and in general increases in the northern part of the district from the west towards the east. The
heaviest rainfall in 24 hours recorded at any station in the district was 323.9 mm. at Garoth on 1945 June 29.
In the district there is rapid increase in temperatures after February. May is generally the hottest month with the mean
daily maximum temperature at 39.80 °C and the mean daily minimum at 25.40 °C. Days are intensely hot in summer and
hot dust-laden winds which below during this season add to the discomfort. On individual days in the summer session
and in June before the onset of the monsoon the day temperatures often go up above 45 °C. January is the coldest mo
with the mean daily maximum temperature at 35.00 °C and mean daily minimum at 9.30 °C.
Temperature High 39.8 ° C

Humidity High
Rainfall mm/year 786.6 MM
Rainy Season June To October
B) Location of the Road-
Type of ecosystem Yes No
Coastal Area
Mangrove
(along road side)
Hilly/ Mountainous area (Explain the

topography of the area and how many Km. of the road area located
in the hilly area)
Forest Area (Explain whether

the road passes through the forest area what is the length of the
road that passes through or located along the forest area and
distance from road shoulder the forest area)?
Lake/ Swam (Explain the distance of the road shoulder from the
edge of the lake)
Inhabited area
Agricultural Land
Barren Land
Flat Area
C. Description ot the Road Environment
Parameter/ Component Yes No

Is the area along the project road prone to landslide problems?
Is the area along the project road prone to flooding problems?

Along the road and within 500 m of the road shoulder, is there
any area with natural habitat?
Along the road and within 500 m of the road shoulder, is there any
species of flora and fauna that is classified as endangered species?
any faunal breeding ground?
any bird migration area?
D- Impacts and proposed Mitigation Measures ( Describe concisely the potential impacts and indicate the prop
mitigation measures by referring to the number of the Environmental Management Standard ECOP in the main tes
Potential
Environmental
Impacts
With the Project cause----- Yes No
Encroachment on historical/ cultural areas?

Disfiguration of landscape by road embankments, cuts, fills, and
quarries?
Encroachment of precious ecology (e.g. sensitive of protected areas)?
Alteration of surface water hydrology of waterways crossed by roads,

resulting in increased sediment in streams affected by increased soil
erosion at construction site?
Deterioration of surface water due to sanitary wastes from worker

based camps and chemicals and chemicals used in construction?
Inconvenient environmental condition due to poor sanitation and solid

waste disposal in construction camps and work sites?
Inconvenient environmental condition due possible transmission of

communicable diseases from workers to local populations?
Deterioration of surface water quality due to silt runoff?

Increased local air pollution due to rock crushing, cutting, and filling
works. And chemicals from asphalt processing?
Noise and vibration due to blasting and other civil works?
Inconvenience due to land slide of erosion?
Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people?
Other social concerns relating to inconveniences in living condition in

the project areas that may trigger cases of upper respiratory problems
and stress?
Creation of temporary breeding habitats for mosquito vectors of
disease?
Accident risks associated with increased vehicular traffic leading to loss

of life?
Inconvenience due to transportation of construction

materials?
E) Public Consultation
Consultation Activities Yes No
Consultation with local community was conducted before finalizing the

alignment? (provide the issues raised by the community)
Any suggestion received in finalizing the alignment
If suggestion received do they get incorporated into design?
F) Permit/ Clearance Required Prior to Commencing Civil Work
Type of Permit/ Clearance Yes No

SPCB-Non Objection Certificate
Forest Department
MOEF
For water extraction
For Quarry
For Disposing Spoil Materials
Other (Describe the the remarks column)
L CHECKLIST
soi) To Gelana
n south-west monsoon. Year may be divided

owed by the hot season from March to the
ues up to about the middle of September.
icts in the region round about Sitamau-
strict from the west towards the east. The
mm. at Garoth on 1945 June 29.
nerally the hottest month with the mean
°C. Days are intensely hot in summer and
On individual days in the summer session
p above 45 °C. January is the coldest month,
m at 9.30 °C.
Low 9.30°C
Low
786.6 MM
tober
Explanation
CH-1200-1400
Explanation
otential impacts and indicate the proposed
agement Standard ECOP in the main test)
MITIGATION MEASURES
Remarks
Remarks
(recommended time to apply

for the permit / Clearance)
CHAINAGE WISE MATRIX
Name of District :- Mandsaur
Total Road Length :- 4.25 Km.
(a) EXISTING UTILITY AND STRUCTURES ALONG THE ROAD
Chainage wise Matrix
Lef Right
Chainage (m)
8 to 10m 6 to 8m 4 to 6m 2 to 4m 0 to 2m 0 to 2m 2 to 4m 4 to 6m
1 Tree 1 Tree 0-100 Bus Stop
100-200 Well
1 Tree 200-300 Well
1 E.P. 300-400 1 Tree
400-500
1 Tree 1 Tree 500-600 1 Tree
1 E.P. 2 Tree 600-700
700-800
Culvert 800-900
900-1000 1 E.P.
Culvert 1000-1100
1100-1200 1 Tree
1 Tree 1200-1300
1300-1400
1400-1500 1 Tree
1 Tree 1500-1600
1 Tree 1600-1700
1 Tree Culvert 1700-1800
1 Tree Culvert 1800-1900
1900-2000
2000-2100
Culvert 2100-2200
Culvert 2200-2300
2300-2400
1 Tree 2400-2500
2500-2600 1 Tree
2600-2700 1 Tree
2700-2800 1 Tree
2800-2900
2900-3000
3000-3100
1 Tree 3100-3200
1 Tree 3200-3300
3300-3400
1 Tree 3400-3500
1 Tree 3500-3600
3600-3700
3700-3800
Culvert 3800-3900
3900-4000 1 Tree
4000-4100
4100-4200
4200-4250
Utility:- Electric Pole (E.P.), Hand Pump (H.P.), Tube Well (T.W.), Primary Health Center (P.H.C.)
Structure:- Agriculture Land (A.L.), Cross Drainage Structure (C.D.), Water Tank (W.T.)
lks'ky LØhfuax & izk:i 10

10. (a) Chainage wise transect walk finding name of Road:- ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana
Chainage wise Transect Walk Findings
Chainage (m) Existing Land Additional Land Required Losses Type of loss
From To Width (m) LHS RHS LHS RHS LHS RHS
0-700 20-25M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
700-750 4.00 4 4 Private land Private land Farmar Farmar
750-4250 25-30m Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
10. (b) Hkwfe dh vko’;drk ij izHkko &

lkekU; &
orZeku lM+d dPph gS] bls Mkej lrg }kjk mUur fd;k tk jgk gSA
tks fd fuEu ekudksa dks iwjk djrh gks &
I. i;kZIr Hkwfe pkSMkbZ esa miyC/k gSA ¼ gkW@ugha ½
II. de ls de Hkwfe nku esa yh tk ldrh gSA ;fn vko’;d gks rks ¼ gkW@ugha ½
III. orZeku Hkwfe ij dksbZ vfrd`e.k gSA ¼ gkW@ugha ½
IV. ;fn dksbZ vkifRr fu/kkZfjr ekxZ ij gS rks mldk pSust la[;k fy[ks A
Chainage
S. No. Type of Land
L.H.S. R.H.S.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ifj;kstuk lM+d dPph gS bls M+kej lM+d }kjk mUur fd;k tk jgk gSA tks fd fuEu ekudksa dks
10. (c)
gksA ;g fu/kkZfjr ekStwnk pkSM+kbZ @ROW ds Hkhrj fd;k tk;sxk ;k dqN Hkwfe dh vko’;drk gksxh
rVca/k ÅWpkbZ ij fuHkZj djrk gS] [kqyk vkSj clkgV {ks= ds fgLlksa esa (ROW) dh vko’;drk ds :i e
gSA
S. No Chainage
1.
[kkyh txg ¼ d`f"k
Hkwfe ½
2.
[kqyh txg ¼clkgV
{ks=½
3. lksYMj
4. iqfy;k @ iqy ij
10. (d) vfrfjDr Hkwfe dh vko’;drk &

bl fu/kkZfjr ekxZ dh PkkSM+kbZ ds fy, vko’;d vuqca/k i= igys ls gh miyC/k g
vkbZ- ;w- dh vksj ls {ks= dk lR;kiu dk izek.k i= uhps fn;s vuqlkj (ROW) dk m
S. No Chainage vfrfjDr Hkwfe ehVj esa

1
2
3
10. (e) izHkkoksa dk lkjka’k &

S. No izHkko fooj.k ¼;fn dksbZ izHkkfor gks
1
dqy izHkkfor ?kjks dh
la[;k
2 [kkrk /kkjdksa dh la[;k
3
xSj [kkrk /kkjdksa dh
izLrkfor ifj;kstuk
la[;k dh otg
4
ls
dqydqy izHkkfor
izHkkfor lkeqnkf;d
BPL ifjokjksa dh
5
laifRr;ksa dh la[;k
Format-9(B)
CHAINAGE WISE MATRIX
UTILITY AND STRUCTURES ALONG THE ROAD

Chainage wise Matrix
Right
6 to 8m 8 to 10m
School
Primary Health Center (P.H.C.)
D.), Water Tank (W.T.)
y LØhfuax & izk:i 10

age wise Transect Walk Findings
Village Remarks/ Suggestions
Ghasoi All land is Govt land
MOU Sign Ready to

Ghasoi
Donate land for Project
Ghasoi &
All land is Govt land
Gelana
}kjk mUur fd;k tk jgk gSA

ks &
gkW@ugha ½
vko’;d gks rks ¼ gkW@ugha ½
kW@ugha ½
mldk pSust la[;k fy[ks A
Type of Land
}kjk mUur fd;k tk jgk gSA tks fd fuEu ekudksa dks iwjk djrh
ds Hkhrj fd;k tk;sxk ;k dqN Hkwfe dh vko’;drk gksxh izLrkfor (ROW)
clkgV {ks= ds fgLlksa esa (ROW) dh vko’;drk ds :i esa fuEuor~
Chainage
fy, vko’;d vuqca/k i= igys ls gh miyC/k gS] ih-
dk izek.k i= uhps fn;s vuqlkj (ROW) dk mYys[k djsa &
vfrfjDr Hkwfe ehVj esa
a’k &
fooj.k ¼;fn dksbZ izHkkfor gks jgk gks ½
List of Enhancement along the project roa
Name of District Mandsaur Name of Block
Name of Road ANANDDHAM Length of Road

(Ghasoi) To Gelana
Tribal
Name of Target Village Gellana
Yes/No
Name of Village on way
Detail of Existing Road side infrastruc

A
Length of road
Existing roadside infrastructure connecting
SN Location Chainage
connected infrastructure (Indicate
by item)
1 2 3 4
1 School (primary/ secondary) 4225 25 M
2 Shrine/ Mosque 770
3 Anganwadi kendra Nil Nil

Primary Health Centre/ Medical
4 Nil Nil
facility
Community property (Panchayat
5 Nil Nil
Bhawan)
6 Others (Specify) 0 2.2M
Note :- If Coloum No. 7 is No then specify the present Status of Connecting.
Location Chainage
Construction /Re-construction of Cost in Rs. (as
SN of Relevant
infrastructure presented in BoQ)
Structure
1 2 3 4
1 Pedestal for Handpump
Drain for disposal of waste water of
2 handpump
Water well if any 281712.65
3
4 Steps for pond 41857.76
Others (Specify) 315412.16

5
Note :- If Coloum No. 6 is No then specify the Detail of Existing Facility.
Format-12
g the project road in district ………
Tribal
Sitamau
Yes/No
4.25 kms.
Tribal
2
Population
Tribal
Yes/No
ide infrastructure along the road
Cost in Rs. (as Implemented during

presented in construction phase Remark
BoQ)
Yes No
5 6 7 8
Pathway For
Toilet &
Yes
Kitchen and
School
15m Away
No
form Road
Nil Nil Nil Nil
Nil Nil Nil Nil

Nil Nil Nil Nil
Bus Stand
Yes
Paint for Safty
of Connecting.
Implemented during
construction phase
Remark
Yes No
5 6 7
Protection Wall
Wheel Gard
S.B. , Sign
Board
ing Facility.
Five Year Routine Maintenance ( With GST )
Year Cost in Lakh % Cost Cost /KM

I 1.57 0.64 0.37
II 1.85 0.76 0.43
III 2.72 1.11 0.64
IV 3.12 1.28 0.73
V 3.52 1.44 0.83
Total Maintenance Cost, Rs. : 12.78 Lakh 3.01
MPRCP DPR Review Checklist and Score Sheet
State Madhyapradesh Ranking
Road Number 0 0 Not Included
Road Name: ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana 1 Poor Standard
District Mandsaur 2 Fair Standard
Block Sitamau 3 Good Standard
No. Chapter Description Ranking Review-1
1 Introduction: Name of work, its status vis-à-vis master plan, core network,
priority, terrain, geography, climatic conditions, habitation(s)
served, population of the habitation(s) connected, population
(direct + indirect) served by the proposed road, land use,
predomi
2 Planning and Basic IT IS MANDATORY THAT THIS CHAPTER MUST

Design INCLUDE THE COMPLETE PHOTOGRAPH RECORD OF
Considerations: THE ROAD AND ALL EXISTING FEATURES AND
DESCRIBE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS IN DETAIL.Key
map including district and block road hierarchy, through road
or link road, potential for future through road, traffic
destinations (eg markets, block centre), potential developments
and future traffic generators. Preliminary alignment
investigation strip plan including constrictions on ROW,
obligatory points including existing features and fixed
obstacles, existing tracks, intersections, schools and
government buildings. Existing road alignment and proposed
road alignment. Consideration of alternative alignments,
alignment improvements, bypasses. Site photographs at
maximum 100m intervals and all points of interest. Road
design brief.Transect walk summary.
3 Topographic Temporary bench marks, centre line, cross sections, digital

Survey: terrain model, setting out, actual road land width available.
4 Soil and Materials Borrow area, quarry charts, availability of local materials,
Survey: subgrade testing, soil testing, test results.
5 Traffic Survey: IT IS MANDATORY THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
ASPECTS (AS A MINIMUM) ARE ASSESSED. Different
types of rural vehicles plying per day, network transport and
traffic impacts, base year traffic data of motorised and non‐
motorised vehicles, consideration of through road potential,
consideration of specific traffic generators (eg rice mills, sand
mining), comparison with similar roads already in use, growth
rate adopted and projected traffic for the horizon year based on
the design life.
6 Hydrological Local drainage system plan for the area of the road, catchment
Survey: identification, data required for hydraulic design of cross
drainage works, agricultural irrigation crossings.
7 Geometric Design Roadway width, carriageway width, shoulders, design speed,
Standards: horizontal curves, vertical gradient, cross slopes, etc.
8 Alignment Design: Horizontal profile, vertical profile, cross sections, utilities and
services, intersection layouts, road safety treatments. Existing
road alignment and proposed road alignment. Consideration of
alternative alignments, alignment improvements, bypasses.
9 Pavement Design: Design life, design traffic and ESALs, subgrade CBR, design
alternatives, embankment design, type of pavement, hickness
design, use of local materials, type of surfacing adopted, layer
wise design of the pavement along with a sketch of
dimensioned cross section indicating the avement layers,
carriageway, roadway and road land width. Location of earth
shoulders and hard shoulders. Location of BT pavement and
CC pavement.
10 Design of Cross Types of culverts, submersible bridges, paved dips, high level
Drainage: structures, bridges, irrigation crossings, catchment and
discharge calculations, high flood level estimates and
justification for selection.
11 Protective Works: Retaining walls, breast walls, check walls, stone pitching,
turfing and planting.
12 Land Acquisition: Obtain existing village plans from the revenue authorities,
determine requirement for land acquisition, prepare plans
showing the land acquisition.
13 Utility Shifting & IT IS MANDATORY THAT A COST ESTIMATE FOR

Relocation: RELOCATION OF UTILITIES IS PROVIDED. Details of
existing utilities and details of new locations of utilities to be
relocated, the departments responsible for each utility, the rules
pertaining to the shifting/relocation of utilities and cost
estimates for relocation of utilities.
14 Road Safety and Details and locations of speed breakers, line markings and edge
Traffic lines, traffic advisory and warning signs, stone markers and
Management: guide posts. Audit the design at a stage when the major
conceptual and layout decisions have already been made.
Ensure that safety
15 Specifications: Choice of technology, specifications adopted.
16 Environmental Reinstatement of borrow areas, erosion control, filling of

Issues: ponds, vegetation and tree removal, forest areas, wildlife,
antiquities, historic and religious sites, environmentally
sensitive areas, construcion camps, permits and clearances
required, etc.
17 Analysis of Rates: Derivation of rates for all different items making up the
designed works.
18 Cost Estimate: Estimate of quantities for all items of work, provision for
contingencies, provision for quality control, provision for
supervision, provision for logo and other road furniture, total
cost of the proposed road, bridges and drainage, cost of land
acquisition and cost per km for the same.
19 Construction Brief methodology statement describing construction activities

Program: and sequence, estimated duration of activities, estimated
overall time required for construction and analysis of impact of
monsoon season on construction period.
Drawing Description
1 Key Map: Showing the state in relation to India, district in relation to
state, and a district map showing all the blocks, with the names
of each block marked.
2 Block Road Map: Showing the master plan and the core network and the
proposed road.
3 Index Road Map: Showing the full road to asuitable scale, topographical features
like rivers, canals, streams, railway lines, villages, market
centres, other roads and legend. Alternative alignments,
alignment improvements, bypasses.
4 Plan and IT IS MANDATORY THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING

Longitudinal INFORMATION (AS A MINIMUM) IS SHOWN ON THE
Sections: DRAWINGS. Drawings showing 1 km in each sheet with
chainage, level information, gradient details, horizontal and
vertical curve details. Utilities and services, intersection
layouts, road safety treatments, longitudinal drainage and
drainage in built up (village) areas. Existing road alignment
and proposed road alignment. Location of earth shoulders and
hard shoulders. Location of BT pavement and CC pavement.
Obligatory points including existing features and fixed
obstacles (eg bridges, ponds, temples, etc), existing tracks,
intersections, schools and government buildings. LARGE
SCALE DRAWINGS WHERE ALIGNMENT EVIATES
FROM EXISTING CENTRELINE AND WHERE
CLEARANCE IS TIGHT.
5 Typical Cross Drawings showing typical road cross sections, pavement

Sections: details including BT and CC, hard shoulder and soft shoulder,
batter slopes, longitudinal drainage. Typical cross sections in
built up village areas and typical sections in normal rural areas.
6 Detailed Cross Drawings showing detailed cross sections with level

Sections: information, centre line offset details and so on.
7 Cross Drainage: Drawings of culverts, submersible bridges, paved dips and high
level bridges, giving general arrangement drawings (GAD),
structural details.
8 Protective Work: Drawings of protective works like retaining walls, breast walls,
check walls, drains.
9 Traffic and Drawings like kilometre stones, traffic signs, hazard signs,
Miscellaneous: advisory signs, speed breakers, line marking, stone markers,
guide posts, project sign boards.
Reviewed By Name:
Position: General Manager
Organisation: MPRRDA Total Score
Date
ew Checklist and Score Sheet
Ranking
Not Included
Poor Standard
Fair Standard
Good Standard
Review-2

Hyd

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Hyd

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

NAME OF ROAD ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) To Gelana CONNECTING VILLA

START ANANDDHAM (Ghasoi) END Gelana NAME

TOTAL LENGTH 4.250 IN KM SURVEY DATE 20-Apr-18 Ramnagar

LENGTH OF CC (m) 0 LENGTH OF BT (m) 4250 Dhankhedi

CC M-30 BT ROAD Dhanwada

0 0 4250 4250 7 Gelana

0 T Juction Earthen Flexible

4250 Y Junction Earthen Flexible

Female headed household :

Households losing structures

EXISTING CD STRUCTURE PROPOSED CD STRUCTURE

1 840 2X1000 HPC

Shifting (Electric Pole & HT Line)

2X1000 HPC 3.84

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

Total Length of Roa4.250 Kms

2 Planning and Basic Design Consideration

4 Soil and Materials Survey

7 Geometric Design Standards

10 Design of Cross Drainage

11 Protective Works & Drainage

14 Traffic Management and Road Safety Measures

1.1 Objectives of Double Connectivity Rural Roads under MPRCP

Objectives of the project is to constructed alternative connectivity under MPRCP (Double

1.2 All Weather Road.

1.3 Core Network

1.5 Climatic Condition

2.2 Key maps

2.3 Road Design Brief

No. Location Issue Design solutions

CH-2100-1-3X2 M Slab Culvert

CH-1900-1-6X4 M Slab Culvert

CH-1700-1-6X4 M Slab Culvert

CH-1075-1-3X2 M Slab Culvert

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open

Both side Open