Amir Omerasevic Project: -

Phone: Item: (Untitled)

Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 1

Item: (Untitled)
Isolated Foundation FD+ 02/2018 (Frilo R-2018-2)

System
Plan view

Foundation acc. to NA to BS EN 1992-1-1/A2:2015-07 and NA to BS EN 1997-1/A1:2014-07

Member Concrete Steel Width (x) Width (y) Height (z)

m m m
Foundation C 25/30 B 500B 3.00 2.50 0.50
Column C 40/50 B 500B 0.50 0.50 0.00
Pocket, exterior 1.20 1.30 1.05
pocket, top 0.60 0.60 1.05
pocket, bottom 0.60 0.60 1.05
Anchoring depth 1.50 m. Without groundwater Design value of the bearing pressure resistance σ R,d = 350.00 kN/m2. Joint
width below the column base 0.05 m. The side faces of the column base and the inner surfaces of the pocket holes shall be
produced with a corrugated or formwork with indentations, whose profile depth is at least 10 mm, see EC2-1-1, 6.2.5, (NCI)
Fig. 6.9 Indented joint and 10.9.6.2.
Soil
Values
Soil properties γ=18.50 kN/m3 γ'=11.00 kN/m3 φ'=30.00° c'=0.00 kN/m2
Other values of the soil layers for the settlement analysis
No. d from to Es x E* cα e0 k Drainage
m m m kN/m2 kN/m2 m/s
1 1.50 0.00 1.50 2473.00 0.50 4946.00 0.00300000 0.70000000 1.000*10 -9 one-sided
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 2

Loads
Actions (Act)

Act Name ψ0 ψ1 ψ2 simultaneous load cases

A Cat. A: domestic, residental areas 0.70 0.50 0.30 2
I Wind loads 0.60 0.20 0.00 3,4
g Permanent loads 1.00 1.00 1.00 1
ae Seismic loads 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,6
Column loads - characteristic

No. Act Description N Mx My Hx Hy SIM ALT

kN kNm kNm kN kN
1 g Load case 1 500.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0
2 A Load case 2 300.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 0
3 I Load case 3 0.0 50.00 0.00 0.0 -15.0 0 0
4 I Load case 4 0.0 0.00 30.00 6.0 0.0 0 0
5 ae Load case 4 0.0 120.00 0.00 0.0 -25.0 0 0
6 ae Load case 5 0.0 0.00 120.00 25.0 0.0 0 0
Self-weight is taken into account in the proofs. Density Concrete : ρ = 25.00 kN/m3. Pocket : 1.638 m3. Total Foundation
with columns 5.388 m3 / 134.70 kN. Horizontal loads act on the upper edge of the pocket. Torsion from horizontal loads is
not considered.
Load Case Graphics
Load case 1 - Permanent loads
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 3

Load case 2 - Cat. A: domestic, residental areas

Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 4

Load case 3 - Wind loads

Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 5

Load case 4 - Wind loads

Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 6

Load case 5 - Load case 4 - Seismic loads

Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 7

Load case 6 - Load case 5 - Seismic loads

Superposition
No. DS Superposition
1 P 1.35 x (1) + 1.5 x (2) + 0.9 x (3) + 0.9 x (4)
2 P 1.0 x (1)
3 E 0.95 resp. 1.0 x (1) + 1.0 x (6)
4 E 0.95 resp. 1.0 x (1) + 1.0 x (5)
5 E 1.0 x (1) + 1.0 x (6)
6 P 1.0 x (1) + 1.0 x (3) + 1.0 x (4)
7 P 1.35 x (1) + 1.5 x (2) + 0.9 x (4)
8 P 1.35 x (1) + 1.5 x (2)
9 E 1.0 x (1) + 1.0 x (5)
10 P 1.35 x (1) + 1.5 x (2) + 0.9 x (3)
DS: design situation P: Permanent E: Earthquake
The load case numbers are listed in parentheses.

Results
Preview Checks

Check Superposition η
Stability 4 0.21
Gaping joint only permanent loads 2 0.00
Gaping joint permanent and variable loads 6 0.02
Simplified method 1 0.53
Resulting inclination of bearing pressure 5 0.20
Safety against sliding 5 0.08
Bearing resistance 1 0.00
Punching vEd/vRd,c 8 0.21
Punching vEd/vRd,max 8 0.12
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 8

Preview Reinforcement

Type Superposition cm2

Bending As x,u 7 15.3
Bending As y,u 1 18.4
Horizontal stirrups of pocket top As x,o 5 3.8
Horizontal stirrups of pocket top As y,o 5 3.8
Vertical stirrups of pocket As x,v 5 3.9
Vertical stirrups of pocket As y,v 5 3.6
Stability (EQU) Superposition

No. at MEd,dst MEd,st η

m kNm kNm
3 x = 1.50 158.75 904.45 0.18
3 x = -1.50 0.00 1063.20 0.00
3 y = 1.25 0.00 753.71 0.00
4 y = -1.25 158.75 753.71 0.21
Stability: Stabilizing and destabilizing moments around outer edges
The particial safety factors of the superpositions are constant in loadcases.
The vertical component of earth pressure by anchoring depth is not considered.
Gaping joint
Superposition only permanent loads
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 9

Superposition permanent and variable loads

Check Gaping joint Superposition

No. N ex ey a*/(1/6) b*/(1/9) ηG ηG,Q

kN m m
2 634.7 0.00 0.00 0.000/0.167 0.00
6 634.7 0.06 -0.12 0.003/0.111 0.02
a*=ex/bx+ey/by b*=(ex/bx)2+(ey/by)2
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 10

Simplified method
Superposition

The angle of the characteristic resulting force in bearing pressure

tan δ = H/V = 0.04 ≤ 0,2
The angle of the characteristic resulting force in bearing pressure
makes the simplified check possible.
Design value of the bearing pressure resistance σ R,d = 350.00 kN/m2
σRd = 350.00 kN/m2. The design value of the base pressure resistance will is directly specified.
Simplified method Superposition

No. Nd a' b' σd σRd η

kN m m kN/m2 kN/m2
1 1306.8 2.95 2.41 184.15 350.00 0.53
The bearing pressure is influenced by partial safety factors.
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 11

Safety against sliding

Superposition

Safety against sliding Superposition

No. TEdx TEdy Nk δSK Rtk Rtd γRh η

kN kN kN ° kN kN
5 25.0 0.0 634.7 30.00 366.4 333.1 1.1 0.08
The friction angle of the sole has been removed from the ground layer at the level of the foundation base and has been
limited to 35°.
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 12

Bearing resistance
Superposition

Check
Bearing Resistance Check Superposition 1 - Soil properties
x d ls φ' ls*φ' c' ls*c' A γ A*γ
m m m ° °m kN/m2 kN/m m2 kN/m3 kN/m
1 2.08 2.08 6.57 30.0 197.2 0.00 0.0 21.50 18.50 397.69
2 2.98 0.89 2.75 30.0 82.6 0.00 0.0 6.08 18.50 112.41
3 3.25 0.28 1.09 30.0 32.8 0.00 0.0 1.41 18.50 26.14
4 3.82 0.57 4.81 30.0 144.2 0.00 0.0 1.74 18.50 32.28
15.23 30.0 456.9 0.00 0.0 0.003 18.50 568.51
Bearing Resistance Check Superposition 1 - Factors
N N0 s i g b d r
Nγ 279.980 20.093 0.520 0.974 1.000 1.000 1.000 55.029
Nq 1.461.122 18.401 1.693 0.984 1.000 1.000 0.866 55.029
Nc 43.619 30.140 1.733 0.973 1.000 1.000 0.858 1.000
mB = 1.449 m L = 1.551 m = 1.537
Bearing Resistance Check Superposition 1 - System
B' L' d s ω γ' q' c' φ' α pv
m m m m ° kN/m3 kN/m3 kN/m2 ° ° kN/m2
2.95 2.41 1.50 0.00 0.0 18.50 18.50 0.00 30.0 0.0 0.00
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 13

BS 8004:2015 - Bearing Resistance Check Superposition 1

d' NEk TEkx TEky N Ed Rnk Rnd η
m kN kN kN kN kN kN
1.50 934.7 3.6 9.0 1306.8 376171.5 268693.9 0.00
Settlement to DIN 4019:2014
Calculation
Stress arrangement - Superposition 2
mNN z Δd γ Δσa σa 0,2*σa z/b i σz
m m m kN/m3 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2
1 -1.50 0.00 1.50 18.50 27.75 27.75 5.55 0.00 1.00 56.88
Caution! The critical depth not reached The stress analysis is made for rigid footing in the characterizing point by
by DIN 4019:2014 A6.
Settlement - Superposition 2
mNN z Δd σ0' b E* a/b z/b fs 01 fs02 fs 00 s s0 s1
m m m kN/m2 m kN/m2 cm cm cm
1 -1.50 0.00 1.50 56.88 2.50 4946.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
Settlement factor for the characteristic point by DIN 4019:2014 B3. Consolidation settlement s 1 at the time of τ = 1.00 to DIN
4019:2014 12.2. Settlements from permanent and variable loads Gk,j+Qk,1+Qk,i*ψ0,i. Creep settlements s2 not considered.
Settlement Stresses permanent and variable loads Gk,j+Qk,1+Qk,i*ψ0,i
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 14

Time-settlement curve Consolidation permanent and variable loads Gk,j+Qk,1+Qk,i*ψ0,i

Bending
Design Superpositions

Sup. Myu,Ed Mxu,Ed Myo,Ed Mxo,Ed As,xu As,yu As,xo As,yo

kNm kNm kNm kNm cm2 cm2 cm2 cm2
7 226.83 141.78 0.00 0.00 15.3* 18.4* 0.0 0.0
1 226.83 156.84 0.00 0.00 15.3* 18.4* 0.0 0.0
*: Minimal reinforcement by NA to BS EN 1992-1-1/A2:2015-07 9.2.1.1 (1)
Layer of reinforcement Reinforcement in x-direction d1,x = 4.1 cm. Layer of reinforcement Reinforcement in y-direction d1,y
= 4.1 cm. Bending moment determined on the wall axis of the pocket.
Minimum reinforcement to ensure shear capacity acc.to DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA, NCI zu 6.4.5
Min. moments My,min = ηx * vEd * beff,y = 0.125 * 934.8 * 2.02 = 236.03 kNm
Minimum reinforcement As,x,min = = = 11.6 cm2
Min. moments Mx,min = ηy * vEd * beff,x = 0.125 * 934.8 * 1.92 = 224.35 kNm
Minimum reinforcement As,y,min = = = 11.0 cm2
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 15

Superposition Bending design in x-direction

Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 16

Superposition Bending design in y-direction

Bending design without reinforcement

Bending reinforcement is required in the lower layer of steel.
Eccentric load exists
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 17

Reinforcement distribution bottom in m, cm2/m

The peak values of the distribution according to Bulletin 240 of the German Committee for Reinforced Concrete will be
covered. Therefore, the here required reinforcement may be higher than the required reinforcement. In order to ensure the
transverse carrying capacity, the foundation has been dimensioned in the punching range for minimum moments according
to equation (NA.6.54.1), provided the shear force determination has not led to higher values.
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 18

Reinforcement distribution top in m, cm2/m

Column reinforcement

Design by NA to BS EN 1992-1-1/A2:2015-07 - C 40/50 - B 500B

Internal forces Mx=0.00 kNm, My=120.00 kNm, N z=500.0 kN
req. As 5.00 cm2
Corner bar 4Ø20 = 12.57 cm2
Intermediate bar 2Ø20 + 2Ø20 = 12.6 cm2
exist.As 25.13 cm2
Minimal eccentricity for compression members not considered. NA to BS EN 1992-1-1/A2:2015-07 6.1 (4)
Minimal reinforcement for pressed parts considered.
Layer of reinforcement d 1 = 5.0 cm → Design in xy-direcon Reinforcement concentrated in the corners
γC=1.5 and γS=1.15
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 19

Punching
Check of punching Inner perimeter : Superposition 8
ULS for punching according to NA to BS EN 1992-1-1/A2:2015-07
Calculation rules:
The bending strength is calculated as a mean value taking into account a plate
width corresponding to the support dimension plus 3d per side. (6.4.4 (1))

Constant values β / Inner column (auto-generated)

Effective depth dm = 0.46 m
Load introduction cx = 1.20 m Dimension in x-direction
Load introduction cy = 1.30 m Dimension in y-direction
Radius critical punching circle rk = 0.36 m 0.78 * d m
Range of critical punch circle U crit = 7.26 m
Area of critical punch circle Acrit = 3.77 m2
Ratio of reinforcement, existing ρexist = 0.26 %
Ratio of reinforcement, Min. moments ρ min = 0.13 % to 6.4.5
Ratio of reinforcement, maximum usage ρmax. für VRd,c = 2.00 % to 6.4.4
Total load factor = 1.00
Shear force VEd = 1180.28 kN without β
Bearing Pressure σCol = 174.25 kN/m2 along column axis
Bearing pressure deduction qv = 16.88 kN/m2 Area Loads
Shear force,Reduction VEd,Δ = 592.84 kN without β
Shear force,reduced VEd,red = 587.44 kN without β
Factor Symmetry of rotation β = 1.15
Shear stress vEd = 0.20 N/mm2 with β
Shear force,Edge of Column vEd = 0.47 N/mm2 with β
Pre-factor CRd,c = 0.120
Scale factor k = 1.660
Shear slenderness λ = 1.601
Resistance without punching reinforcement v Rd,c = 0.95 N/mm2
Minimum bearing capacity vRd,c,min = 0.64 N/mm2
No additional punching reinforcement required.
Pocket
Design
Pocket Geometry
Pocket Geometry X Y Z
with indented formwork m m m
outside 1.20 1.30 1.05
inside, top 0.60 0.60 1.05
inside, bottom 0.60 0.60 1.05
required anchoring depth 0.75 m < selected anchoring depth 1.05 m. Joint width below the column base 0.05 m. The pocket
depth results from embedment depth plus joint width. Height of pocket from top edge of foundation 1.05 m. The side faces
of the column base and the inner surfaces of the pocket holes shall be produced with a corrugated or formwork with
indentations, whose profile depth is at least 10 mm, see EC2-1-1, 6.2.5, (NCI) Fig. 6.9 Indented joint and 10.9.6.2.
Pocket Design
Sup. Direction Stirrup Selected Description FEd req. As exist. As
kN cm2 cm2
38 x Standing stirrup 2*2*2Ø12 + 2*3Ø10 max. V 168.1 3.9 13.8 1
37 y Standing stirrup 2*2*2Ø12 + 2*3Ø14 max. V 157.3 3.6 18.3 1
38 x Ring stirrup top 2*2*3Ø12 Ho 167.1 3.8 13.6
38 y Ring stirrup top 2*2*3Ø12 Ho -167.1 3.8 13.6
38 x Ring stirrup bottom 2*2*5Ø12 Hu 0.0 0.0 22.6
38 y Ring stirrup bottom 2*2*5Ø12 Hu 0.0 0.0 22.6
x,y Standing stirrup total 4*2*2Ø12 + 2*2*3Ø10 + 2*2*3Ø14 15.0 46.0 2

1 : Corner and side stirrups in one pocket wall

2 : All vertical stirrups in pocket

The stand bracket in the corners are fully recognized for both design directions. To avoid overloading in heavily biaxial stress,
the total amount of the stand brackets is verified in addition. Calculation acc.to Leonhardt Teil 3:1977, 16.3.3.
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 20

Pocket
Laying measure lateral and top cV,s,o = 2.0 cm
Laying measure bottom cV,u = 10.0 cm
Req. anchoring depth t = 0.75 m Column
Sel. anchoring depth1) t = 1.05 m Column
1) The pocket depth results from embedment depth plus joint width
The side faces of the column base and the inner surfaces of the pocket holes shall be produced with a corrugated or
formwork with indentations, whose profile depth is at least 10 mm, see EC2-1-1, 6.2.5, (NCI) Fig. 6.9 Indented joint and
10.9.6.2.

Reinforcement
Plan view
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 21

Section B

Section C
Amir Omerasevic Project: -
Phone: Item: (Untitled)
Fax: 10/18/2018 Page: 22

Section A