Sei sulla pagina 1di 13

# Ozair 3

## I. Problem 1: Tangential, Radial & Longitudinal Stresses in a

Cylindrical Vessel

This problem was analyzed by using both 2D and 3D Analyses. The set-up and results
for each analysis is given below.

A. 2D Analysis

The cylindrical vessel can be analyzed using 2D analysis. For this problem, sketch of the
rectangular cross section was created with the given dimensions. This is shown in Fig 1.
Ozair 4

## Figure 1: Rectangular cross section with its mesh

After 2D rectangular surface was generated, it was exported to Mechanical and its
2D behavior was set to ‘2D axisymmetric’. After mesh was generated, temperature
boundary conditions were applied to the left and right edge of the rectangle. For this
analysis type, the left edge of rectangle represents the inner side of the vessel whereas
the right edge represents the outer side. The following thermal solutions were
retrieved.
i. Temperature Distribution

Ozair 5

## ii. Temperature at x = 0.2788 in

A new coordinate system was set with its origin at (0.2788, 0). Using a temperature
probe, with scoping method set to the new coordinate system called “Temp.
Location”, the temperature at the specified distance was determined.

## iii. Max. and Min. Tangential Stress

In order to find thermal stresses developed within the vessel, the problem was
treated as a coupled problem. Importing results from thermal analysis, a new static
structural analysis was carried out. Frictionless supports were applied at the opposite
ends of the rectangle to limit deformation in the z-direction. The generated result is
shown below.

Figure 4 : Tangential Stress at inner layer (left edge) and outer layer (right edge)

FEA %
Results Theoretical Difference
(psi) (psi)
419.93 420 0.016666667
-194.59 -194 0.304123711
Ozair 6

## The max radial stress was determined to be 85.981 psi

FEA
Results Theoretical % Difference
(psi) (psi)
85.981 87 1.171264368

FEA Results
(psi)
Max. 31380
Min. 30765
Ozair 7

## Figure 6: Longitudinal Stresses

B. 3D Analysis

The cylindrical vessel was analyzed using 3D analysis. For this problem, half of the
cylindrical vessel was sketched and extruded by 5 in. This is shown in Fig 1.

## Figure 7: 3D half vessel with mesh

Ozair 8

After 3D half cylinder was generated, it was exported to Mechanical. After mesh was
generated, temperature boundary conditions were applied to the inner and outer walls
of the cylinder. The following thermal solutions were retrieved.

i. Temperature Distribution

## ii. Temperature at x = 0.2788 in

A new coordinate system was set with its origin at (0.2788, 0). Using a
temperature probe, with scoping method set to the new coordinate system called
“Temp. Probe”, the temperature at the specified distance was determined.

## Figure 9: Value of Temp. At x = 0.2788 in

In order to find thermal stresses developed within the vessel, the problem
was treated as a coupled problem. Importing results from thermal analysis, a new
static structural analysis was carried out. Symmetry condition was set at the two
faces that are parallel to the plane of cut of the cylinder.
Ozair 9

Frictionless supports were applied at the two bottom faces of vessel as shown
below:

## Figure 10: Frictionless support faces

Displacement boundary condition was applied to the opposite faces in the longitudinal
direction to restrict deformation in the z- direction.

Ozair 10

## Figure 13: Tangential Stress at the Outer Wall

FEA
Results Theoretical % Difference
(psi) (psi)
418.78 420 0.29047619
-194.54 -194 0.278350515
Ozair 11

## The max radial stress was determined to be 86.121 psi

FEA %
Results Theoretical Difference
(psi) (psi)
86.121 87 1.010344

## Figure 15: Longitudinal Stress

Ozair 12

FEA Results
(psi)
Max. 31380
Min. 30765

It can be observed that the results for longitudinal stress are exactly alike for both 2D and
2D analysis.

## II. Problem 2: Development of Cortical/Trabecular Bones around

Dental Implants

sketched and generated around the implant in the Design Modeler of ANSYS. The model of
the bone is given in the picture below:
Ozair 13

Ozair 14

## Figure 18: Cortical Bone

** The following volume percentage data is calculated from earlier results that were
generated without convergence. The current solution with convergence is taking significant
amount of time, therefore, I am presenting volume percentages of earlier results below

Trabecular Bone

## No. of Elements Tot. Elements Vol. %

Disuse 4 149838 0.0027
Pathological
149838