Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
LAB REPORT 8
2ZK50
(GROUP 8)
3. PKDT SYED FARIS HAZIM BIN SYED AMRIL SYARMIN TLDM (2170275)
DATE OF SUBBMISION:
5 DECEMBER 2018
OBJECTIVE
The objective for the experiments included being able to note the effect of
frequency on the impedance of a series R-C network and being able to plot the
voltages and current of a series R-C network versus frequency. Hence, learn how to
calculate and plot the phase of the input impedance versus frequency for a series R-
C network.
INTRODUCTION
For series R-L network, the voltage across the coil increases with frequency
since the inductive reactance increases directly with frequency and the impedance of
the resistor is essentially independent of the applied frequency (in the audio range).
For the R-C network, the voltage across the capacitor decreases with increasing
frequency since the capacitive reactance is inversely proportional to the applied
frequency. Since the voltage and current of the resistor continue to be related by the
fixed resistance value, the shapes of their curves versus frequency will have the
same characteristics. Voltage across the elements in an AC circuit are vectorially
related. Otherwise, the voltage readings may appear to be totally incorrect and not
satisfy Kirchoff’s voltage law.
The phase angle associated with the input impedance is sensitive to the
applied frequency. At very low frequencies the capacitive reactance will be quite
large compared to the series resistive element and the network will be primarily
capacitive in nature. The result is a phase angel associated with the input impedance
that approaches -90º (v lags I by 90º). At increasing frequencies Xc will drop off in
magnitude compared to the resistive element and the network will be primarily
resistive, resulting in an input phase angle approaching 0º (v and I in phase).
PROCEDURES
1 x Resistor 1kΩ
1 x Capacitor 0.1µF
DMM
Oscillator
Function generator
Frequency counter (if available)
a) The network in Figure 1 constructed and the value of the resistor R measured
to be inserted in the diagram. R measured = 997Ω
Figure 1
b) 4V (p-p) maintained at the input to the circuit, the voltage Vc (p-p) recorded
for the frequencies appearing in Table 1. Continually checked that Es = 4V (p-
p) with each frequency change. Voltage VR did not measure at this point
during the experiment. The common ground of the supply and scope shorten
the effect of the capacitive element, which may result in damage to the
equipment.
For each frequency Vc was tried to read to the highest degree of accuracy
possible. The higher the degree of accuracy, the better the data will verify the
theory to the substantiated.
c) The supply turned off and interchange the positions of R and C in Figure 1
and VR (p-p) is measured for the same range of frequencies with E maintained
at 4V (p-p). The measurements recorded in Table 1.
d) I (p-p) calculated manually from equation I (p-p) = VR (p-p) / Rmeasured [1] and
then recorded into Table 1.
Table 1
e) The curve of Vc (p-p) versus frequency plotted on Graph 1. Label the curve
and clearly indicated each plotted point.
f) The curve of VR (p-p) versus frequency on Graph 1. The curve lebelled and
clearly indicated each plotted point.
When the frequency increases the value of the voltage across the capacitor
decrease from the start reading taken. Since capacitors charge and discharge
in proportion to the rate of voltage change across them, the faster the voltage
changes the more current will flow. This means then that the reactance of a
capacitor is “inversely proportional” to the frequency.
When the frequency increase, the voltage across the resistor also increase.
This is because voltage is directly proportional to resistance.
1
Xc = 2πfC [2]
1
=
2π(1.7kHz)(0.1µF)
= 936.2 Ω
Vc=VR=1.7kHz
Xc=936.2 Ω
R=0.987 kΩ
i) Determine Vc (p-p) and VR (p-p) at some random frequency such as 3.6 kHz
from the curves
j) The curve of I (p-p) versus frequency plotted on Graph 2. The curve labelled
and clearly indicated each plot point.
k) How does the curve of I (p-p) versus frequency compare to the curve of VR (p-
p) versus frequency? Explain why they compare as they do.
Vc (p−p)
Xc = [3]
I (p−p)
1.12
=
3.85m
= 291 Ω
1
Xc =
2πfC
1
=
2π(6kHz)(0.1µF)
= 265.26 Ω
Xc(calculated) = 265.25 Ω Xc (from data) = 291 Ω
a) The result of I (p-p) transferred from Table 1 to Table 2 for each frequency.
b) At each frequency, calculate the magnitude of the total impedance using the
equation ZT = E(p-p) / I (p-p) in Table 2.
Table 2
c) The curve of ZT versus frequency plotted on Graph 3 except for f = 0.1 kHz,
which is off the graph. The curve labelled and clearly indicate each plotted
point.
d) For each frequency calculate the total impedance using the equation
e) How does the magnitude of ZT compare for the last two columns of Table 2?
i) For frequencies less than the frequency calculated in part 2(h), is the network
primarily resistive or capacitive? How about for frequencies greater than the
frequency calculated in part 2(h)?
Both frequencies are the same. For frequencies less than the frequency
calculated above, the network is primarily capacitive. For frequencies more
than the frequency calculated above, the network is primarily resistive.
j) The phase angle by which the applied voltage leads the current is determined
by Ø = - tan-1(XC/R) [8] (as obtained from the impedance diagram). The
negative sign is clear indication that for capacitive networks, i leads v.
Determine the phase angle for each of the frequencies in Table 3.
Table 3
k) A frequency of 0.1 kHz, does the phase angle suggest a primarily resistive or
capacitive network? Explain why.
At a frequency of 0.1 kHz, the phase angle suggests a primarily capacitive
network because a purely resistive impedance will have a phase angle of
0o while a purely capacitive impedance will have a phase angle of -90o.
l) At frequencies greater than 2 kHz, does the phase angle suggest a primarily
resistive or capacitive network? Explain why.
At a frequency of 2 kHz and above, the phase angle suggests a primarily
resistive network because a purely resistive impedance will have a phase
angle of 0o while a purely capacitive impedance will have a phase angle of -
90.
m) Plot Ø versus frequency for the frequency range 0.2 kHz to 10 kHz on Graph
4. At what frequency is the phase angle equal to –45º? At –45º what is the
relationship between Xc and R? Using this relationship, calculate the
frequency at which Ø = -45º.
f (Ø = -45º) = 1.6 kHz, Xc vs. R = Both are equally capacitive and resistive.
1. Given the network of fig. 1, calculate f = 1 kHz, calculate the magnitude and
phase angle of the input impedance and compare the results to those
obtained experimentally in part 2(a) (ZT = E (p-p)/ I (p-p)) and calculated in
Table 3.
Calculate: Experimental:
ZT= 1591.55 Ω ZT= 1591 Ω
Ø= 57.86 o Ø= 58.15 o
2. Given the network of Fig. 1 with f = 1 kHz, calculate the levels of VC, VR and I
(all peak-to-peak values) and compare to the measured values of Table 1.
Calculate: Measured:
VC= 3.4 V VC= 3.42 V
VR= 2.13 V VR= 2.10 V
I= 2.13 mA I= 2.11 mA
In the conducted experiment, all the results obtained by referring the lab sheet given
and also from this section analyses the results of the experiment. The experiment
went as expected with no unusual events that would have introduced error.
Also included in the procedure are the equations [1] – [8] used for verifying results of
the experiment for frequency response of the series R-C network. These equations
led to the values of OUTPUTS that are shown in the experiment-based on TABLE 1,
TABLE 2, AND TABLE 3. From these results, it is concluded which no error was
occur during experiment.
For Problem;
Part 1:
1
Xc = ( ) = 1591.55 Ω
2π(1kHz)(0.1µF)
Ø = -tan-1(Xc/R) = - tan-1(1591.55/1000)
= 57.86 o
Part 2:
Vc = IXc, Vc = 1592I
VR = IR, VR = 1000I
𝐸(𝑃 − 𝑃) = √𝑉𝑅 2 + 𝑉𝐶 2
4 = √(1592𝐼)2 + (1000𝐼)2
I = 2.13 mA
In this experiment there are several errors that has been occurred during this
lab. One of the errors occurred because of difficulties when handling oscilloscope
due to lack of knowledge. Next, the outcome for these experiments shown
differences with the results, the differences can be handled by checking the
connectivity of each of the circuit to make sure that the breadboard is work
completely and not broken. This error occurred because the resistant of the wire and
the accuracy of the Multimeter that have been used to measure the voltage and
current in this experiment. After that, handle the capacitor carefully due to the
sensitivity of the capacitor to the long-time voltage supply, which is easy to get
damaged. Hence, make sure check the connectivity by using Multimeter to avoid
wrong wiring causing an error to the result. All these errors make the result of the
experiment are slightly different from the actual result.