his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of

an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a
passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into
three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo
doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third
formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the
same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the
researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit
aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative
aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative
physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he
separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing
aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing
with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and
then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those
in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model
were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups
showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the
number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his
groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an
adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive
adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their
assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the
exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the
aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while
the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the
aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and
12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a
video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video
of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for
his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of
an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a
passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into
three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo
doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third
formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the
same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the
researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit
aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative
aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative
physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he
separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing
aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing
with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and
then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those
in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model
were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups
showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the
number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his
groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an
adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive
adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their
assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the
exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the
aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while
the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the
aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and
12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a
video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video
of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for
his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of
an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a
passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into
three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo
doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third
formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the
same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the
researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit
aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative
aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative
physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he
separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing
aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing
with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and
then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those
in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model
were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups
showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the
number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his
groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an
adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive
adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their
assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the
exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the
aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while
the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the
aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and
12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a
video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video
of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for
his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of
an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a
passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into
three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo
doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third
formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the
same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the
researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit
aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative
aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative
physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he
separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing
aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing
with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and
then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those
in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model
were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups
showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the
number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his
groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an
adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive
adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their
assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the
exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the
aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while
the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the
aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and
12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a
video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video
of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for

his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of
an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a
passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into
three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo
doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third
formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the
same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the
researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit
aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative
aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative
physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he
separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing
aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing
with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and
then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those
in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model
were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups
showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the
number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his
groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an
adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive
adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their
assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the
exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the
aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while
the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the
aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and
12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a
video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video
of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for
his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of
an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a
passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into
three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo
doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third
formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the
same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the
researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit
aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative
aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative
physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he
separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an adult showing
aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive adult playing
with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their assigned video and
then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the exception of those
in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the aggressive model
were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while the other groups
showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the aggressive model, the
number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for his
groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a video of an
adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video of a passive
adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched their
assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video (with the
exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children exposed to the
aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll themselves, while
the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children exposed to the
aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys was 38.2 and
12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one was exposed to a
video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was exposed to video
of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group. Children watched
their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had seen in the video
(with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was that children
exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior towards the doll
themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For those children
exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions shown by the boys
was 38.2 and 12.7 for his groundbreaking study he separated participants into three groups: one
was exposed to a video of an adult showing aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll; another was
exposed to video of a passive adult playing with the Bobo doll; and the third formed a control group.
Children watched their assigned video and then were sent to a room with the same doll they had
seen in the video (with the exception of those in the control group). What the researcher found was
that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior
towards the doll themselves, while the other groups showed little imitative aggressive behavior. For
those children exposed to the aggressive model, the number of derivative physical aggressions
shown by the boys was 38.2 and 12.7 for