Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Garrett Schuetz
CTW 11:45
squandered by use of structure, being forced to use specific formats with no room for creativity.
Despite my high school teachers giving me creative freedom on writing topics, we were still
forced to use a template to write with. I feel that teachers should encourage students to write in
different styles, developing a personal style that compliments their individuality, instead of being
In my Junior High, we had to take the “Writing Proficiency Test”, which was a test that
essentially measured how closely you can follow the five paragraph structure given a topic
(which I only found out about afterwards). Despite my essay covering the topic and providing
the exact requirements they wanted, I had slightly deviated from the five paragraph form. They
didn’t let me pass and I was forced to come in during my lunch period and revise my essay.
Unfortunately, experiences like this destroy a students creativity, leaving them discouraged to
make creative writing choices at risk of being punished. In “Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the
Academic Death Penalty”, Howard talks about the effects of a negative interpretation of
plagiarism. Patchwriting is “copying from a source text and then deleting some words, altering
Although the definition has negative connotation in an academic setting, it can actually be a
beneficial tool to students, allowing them to build off of other people's ideas and take a stance on
an issue they might not have fully understood. I believe that this can be compared to paragraph
Schuetz 2
structures, as deviating from these structures can be beneficial for learning, but is considered
“wrong” or “unacceptable” by teachers. Howard also talks about the “positive approaches” that
teachers can implement to encourage non traditional methods to reside in schools (Howard, 789).
Instead of the typical dictatorship that students face in the education system, Howard believes
that teachers should promote and cultivate students’ creativity by allowing them to use
schools haven’t adopted these practices, marking students off for not following traditional
methods.
In “Reading the Lives of Others”, Bartholomae and Petrosky bring up the analogy of
hearing the author’s voice when reading a book. They say that “the pages before you will begin
to speak”, making an author’s individuality extremely important (Bartholomae and Petrosky, 1).
If an author has had the five paragraph essay format “beaten into them”, they will lose their own
structure, the very essence that makes them unique. This is where paragraph formats rid students
of their voice and creativity. From my personal experiences, students are not taught to write in
different styles directed at different audiences. Almost all of the essays I wrote throughout High
School were scholarly and written with the teacher as the sole author. Although everything that I
wrote was “academic”, I would have preferred to try other styles of writing such as poetry or
magazine writing but was forced to write essays in the standard MLA format. By experiencing
new techniques, I would be well versed in writing different forms of literature. However, by
being forced to use a specific style, my writing has been altered and it becomes difficult to
attempt to write in any other style. As a society, we should consider who should be in charge of
deciding that a writing style is right or wrong, as the wrong choice can negatively impact a
Schuetz 3
student’s thought process, ridding them of the ability to creatively come up with new ways to
present information.
In Chimamanda Adichie's "The Danger of a Single Story", she mentions how a single
story can lead to stereotypes and the spread of misinformation. If our “single story” is the writing
style that we were forced to learn, we will be uneducated in other styles, denying the student a
well-rounded education. This is particularly concerning because school is a place where you go
to become educated, but instead students are forced to adhere to specific writing guidelines.
Adichie also talks about “how impressionable and vulnerable we are in the face of a story,
particularly as children”. If this is true, that means that teachers can have a profound effect on
how we learn and how we act. If teachers forced us to write in a certain paragraph structure when
we are young, we will be heavily influenced to continue writing that way. If we are taught from a
young age that there are other ways, we might be more inclined to branch out and consider trying
standard guidelines makes the grading process easier, but in turn, strips the student of his/her
creative freedom. This is a problem I have with current education systems, and I believe that
Since teachers force students to use specific writing styles, students believe that no other
method works. Teachers are in a position of extreme trust with their students, with students
naturally assuming that a teacher is always correct. As a student, you either follow the teacher’s
instructions or risk failing the assignment. This is the problem I have with paragraph structure; if
a teacher forces you to use a certain style, you believe that there is no other acceptable way to
write. Also, students are punished with a lower grade for thinking outside the box and trying new
Schuetz 4
techniques which don’t conform to the standard formatting/template. Since creative writing is a
difficult topic to grade because of its subjectivity, all of the teachers I have had would mark me
down for straying away from the default essay structure. I personally felt that if I was able to
write in whatever format I wanted, I would be able to better explain my point, making it easier to
read and understand. Despite explaining this to my teacher, they would tell me to use the format
given to us and keep the same grade. If writing structures continue to be forced on students, there
will be less diversity in writing and kids will continue to be discouraged for thinking creatively.
Schuetz 5
Works Cited
Bartholomae, David, and Anthony Petrosky. "Reading the lives of others: A sequence for
writers." (1995).
Howard, Rebecca Moore. "Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty." College
How did you begin? What was your reading process like? What about
planning/drafting?
I began by recalling my experience with the assignments I wrote in high school, and
looking through the different texts that agreed with my main point.
Try to avoid “grammar” and “format” as one of these three things. In our writing groups,
we are focusing on the higher order concerns like analysis and synthesis. However, if
you do feel like you need assistance with grammar, please feel free to set up an
appointment with me or contact The HUB.
What part of writing project 1 are you What specific places in your draft show
struggling with? this struggle?
I am feeling good about the main point of my arguments as well as the personal
experiences and supporting evidence