10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
of our interstate overseas additional supplementary
package. If that hasn’t been filled in correctly or they
have provided the scores in a way that is merely
descriptive: superior, gifted, whatever they say, and we
can’t deal with it, we can’t quantify it, and this is the
only thing on which we can depend, then in those cases the
psychologist will be contacted and asked for
clarification. But I’ve got to say that that’s in the
case where people are relying entirely on those alternate
marks. If they're presented as additional evidence of
academic merit and there is something wrong with them
they're just discounted.
Q. Without contact?
A. Mmm.
Q. Without, sort of, going into the details of how the
chart works and how those profile scores are calculated,
can you describe briefly, sort of, whether it’s a
complicated process or a simple process, like
mathematically it’s complicated?
A. Incorporating an IQ?
Q. The process that would be involved if you were
calculating a profile score based on that - including that
IQ score.
A. There are two ways in which we use - which selection
committees can use IQ scores. One of them as the
equivalent of our profile score for students who come with
no other information. But there is another process which
enables the selection committee to incorporate into the
score an IQ equivalent, a most likely - a partial most
likely equivalent. I guess it is a little bit complex in
that you say to the selection committee, on the one hand
we have told parents they can give us other evidence of
academic merit and IQ’s can be interpreted as another
piece of evidence of academic merit provided that it’s
under two years old and all of those things. However,
there is nothing to say that our procedures, our general
ability test, our school marks or anything like that are
at fault in this case. So there’s no ~ the selection
committee can say, all right, I will incorporate this 10
score into the profile score because it’s a piece of
evidence of academic merit. Another selection committee
will say, no, even though it’s under two years and it’s
this, that and the other thing, we won’t incorporate it
because this really is a piece of evidence that somebody
can go out and pay for to get. They can get another bite
of the cherry and that is not equitable. So selection
committees can go either way on this. They can say, all
right, let’s incorporate this but there’s nothing at all
wrong with our process so we'll just incorporate it in the
following formula, we'll take one-third of the IQ most
equivalent profile and we’ll take two-thirds of the
general ability component of that profile and we will
aggregate that. So that usually makes a difference of a
few marks if it makes a difference at all. So that’s how
the partial most likely profile is incorporated. But as I
29/11/05 14 POLLAK X10
15
20
25
30
35
4a
45
50
55
say other selection committees will say, no, that’s really
giving the wealthy another stab at it so we won’t use it.
Q. The criteria you just referred to, one-third 19,
two-thirds--
A. General ability.
Q. --general ability, can I just show you a page from
Mrs Challita’s statement which is the one filed 4 November
in 053290 and there’s a bit which has sort of been
highlighted.
A. Yeah.
Q. Does that reflect the kind of calculation you were
talking about?
A. It does, yes, one-third 1Q, two-thirds general ability
test, that’s what GAT stands for.
LUDLOW: That’s annexure B to that statement.
MONTGOMERY: Which statement is that?
LUDLOW: That’s the statement of Mrs Challita filed on
4 November in 053290.
Q. How many staff work in the selective schools unit that
you are a part of?
A. At the moment we have nine permanent officers and up
to 26 seasonal data entry people. However, that’s only
occurred since the restructure. We used to have - and
those nine people include now five education officers.
Before 2004 we had three education officers, the leader of
the team and two SEO 1s and in 2003 I was an SEO 1 in the
unit.
Q. The seasonal staff you refer to, what kind of season?
Are they casual staff or are they just employed for
certain times of the year?
A. They're data entry and telephone staff, yes.
Q. You’re aware that Mrs Challita has made a number of
freedom of information applications to the department,
some of which pertain to selective schools and opportunity
class applications.
A. I am.
Q. Your unit - I think you state in your statement that
you hold a number of files and folders relating to those
applications.
A. We do.
Q. If it was necessary to go through those files and
folders - at the moment they’re stored I believe, is that
correct?
AL Yes.
Q. If it was necessary to go through those files and
folders to locate particular information relating to the
29/11/05 15 POLLAK X
Selective Schools Unit Allegations of Bullying, Victimisation, Bias, Educational Neglect, Misconduct, Maladministration and A Conspiracy To Cover Up - Just To Name A Few.
Selective Schools Unit Allegations of Bullying, Victimisation, Bias, Educational Neglect, Misconduct, Maladministration and A Conspiracy To Cover Up - Just To Name A Few.