Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

Proceedings of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science 2007, ISETS07 (2007)

Parameters Influencing Clean Syngas Production from Biomass, Solid


Wastes, and Coal during Steam Gasification

K. Sangtongam1, J. Gmurczyk1 and A. K. Gupta 1

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Abstract: High temperature steam gasification of paper, yellow pine woodchips and Pittsburgh black coal
was investigated in a batch type flow reactor at temperatures in the range of 700 °C to 1200 °C at two
different ratios of steam to feedstock molar ratios. Hydrogen yield of 54.7% for paper, 60.2% for
woodchips and 57.8% for coal was achieved on a dry basis, with a steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min at steam
temperature of 1200°C. The yield of both the hydrogen and carbon monoxide increased while carbon
dioxide and methane decreased with the increase in gasification temperature. A tenfold reduction in tar
residue was obtained at high temperature steam gasification, as compared to low temperatures. Higher
steam to feedstock molar ratio increased the amount of hydrogen in the syngas. However, increase in the
steam flow rate resulted in decreased hydrogen content and increased carbon dioxide in the syngas
produced. Thus the gasification temperature can be used to control the amounts of methane or hydrogen
produced from the gasification process. The syngas produced can be further processed to produce pure
hydrogen. This also provides mean to produce hydrocarbon rich syngas, which can then be processed to
produce liquid hydrocarbon fuel. The biomass fuels are good source of renewable fuels to produce
hydrogen or liquid fuels using controlled steam gasification.

Keywords: Steam Gasification, Hydrogen from Wastes and Biomass, Ultra-high Temperature Steam
Gasification, Biomass

1. INTRODUCTION reducing tars and that the use of steam as the gasifying
The increased energy demand and dwindling fossil fuel agent also improves the quality of the syngas. Pinto, et al.
reserves necessitate the development of alternative and [4] obtained up to 50% hydrogen in their syngas by
sustainable fuel options that can be used in current as gasifying pine woodchips mixed with plastic wastes.
well as future energy conversion systems. Crude oil, Franco, et al. [5] achieved almost 35% of hydrogen in
natural gas and coal reserves are estimated to last for their syngas from the gasification of pine wastes in a
about 30, 50 and 250 years, respectively [1]. It is fluidized bed, while maintaining methane and carbon
recognized that future fuel discoveries may extend this dioxide levels at about 10-15%. Although the research
time duration. Furthermore, at present oil and natural gas results shown by the above investigators have shown a lot
together constitute almost 50% of the world’s energy of promise for clean syngas fuel conversion of solid fuels
source. This then suggests that one can anticipate facing and wastes, no data are available at temperatures
to replace almost half of our energy production with exceeding 900°C. It has been shown, however, by
alternative sources of energy in the near term. equilibrium calculations that gasification at temperatures
One of the attractive alternative fuels, which have been above of 900°C can produce syngas with hydrogen
given considerable attention, is hydrogen. Despite being concentrations well in excess of 50% [6].
considered the cleanest fuel, hydrogen is still produced This study focuses on the high and ultra-high
through processes which pollute the environment, such as temperature steam gasification of paper, woodchips and
methane-steam reforming, which produces substantial coal to produce hydrogen-rich syngas while minimizing
amounts of carbon dioxide and uses useful energy pollutant emissions, hydrocarbons, tars and solid residue
resources, such as hydrocarbon fuels. Gasification, a by-products. Pure steam gasification was chosen over
process of converting solid fuel into gas under steam/air or steam/oxygen gasification (also called
oxygen-starved conditions, has been known as a “unbound oxygen” gasification), because it was shown in
promising technology capable of producing previous studies [7] that it can maximize hydrogen yield
hydrogen-rich fuel from solid feedstock, such as, biomass, while keeping carbon dioxide content to a minimum.
municipal and industrial solid wastes and coals [1-16]. Furthermore, the use of ultra-high temperatures favor the
The syngas produced is of low to medium calorific value formation of hydrogen while simultaneously reducing
and is rich in hydrogen and carbon monoxide [2]. The tars, carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons.
gasification technology can greatly reduce tars and
organic material in the residue and also minimizes the 2. CHEMISTRY AND THERMODYNAMICS OF
production of carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons which are GASIFICATION
directly responsible for the global warming from this and The main reactions that occur during the gasification
other greenhouse gases as well as depletion of ozone. process involve steam, oxygen, hydrogen, carbon dioxide,
Wei, et al. [3] has shown that temperature is the most carbon monoxide, and methane are provided in the
important factor in increasing hydrogen yield and following [8]. The pyrolysis and gasification can make

Corresponding author: A. K. Gupta, akgupta@umd.edu

617
Proceedings of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science 2007, ISETS07 (2007)

significant contributions to the waste fuel conversion to moisture and particulates from the syngas are condensed
result in significant variations in the product gas out by passing the sample through a moisture condenser
composition [9-16]. and a set of particulate filters. The sample composition
Combustion reactions: is then analyzed by a Micro Gas Chromatograph. A set of
C + O2 => CO2 - 394 MJ/kmol (2.1) thermocouples are also used to monitor the temperature at
C + ½ O2 => CO - 111 MJ/kmol (2.2) various locations in the process.
CO + 2 O2 => CO2 - 283 MJ/kmol (2.3)
H2 + 2 O2 => H2O - 242 MJ/kmol (2.4)
Furnace
Boudouard reaction:
C + CO2 <=> 2 CO + 172 MJ/kmol (2.5)
Steam bypass
Carbon shift reaction:
C + H2O <=> CO + H2 + 131 MJ/kmol (2.6) Steam inlet

Hydrogenation reaction: To micro GC


C + 2 H2 <=> CH4 - 75 MJ/kmol (2.7) Feedstock

Combustion Chamber
The combustion reactions proceed as long as there is H2
free oxygen in the reactor. Once free oxygen is depleted O2
and the combustion reactions are complete, only the last
three reactions (Boudouard, Carbon shift and
Hydrogenation) can be considered to determine the Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of the continuous flow
equilibrium composition of the syngas. As soon as carbon gasification reactor.
conversion is complete, only two homogenous reactions
are needed to describe the process:
The samples used in the present study consist of: white
paper, yellow pine woodchips and Pittsburgh coal.
Water gas shift reaction:
Table 1 provides the chemical composition of each
CO + H2O <=> CO2 + H2 - 41 MJ/kmol (2.8)
sample feedstock examined in this study. Nominal sample
weight for each material examined was about 30 grams.
Steam methane reforming reaction:
The steam flow rate was varied between 3.3 g/min and
CH4 + H2O <=> CO2 +3 H2 + 206 MJ/kmol (2.9)
6.3 g/min to analyze the effect of steam/feedstock ratio
on the composition of the syngas. This allowed for more
All these reactions proceed in both the directions until
than 2 fold increase in the steam/feedstock ratio during
thermodynamic equilibrium is reached, as long as the
the gasification. The temperature of the steam as
residence time in the reactor is satisfied. It can be seen
gasifying agent was varied between 700°C and 1200°C.
from the above reactions that decreasing the amount of
oxygen in the reactor and using pure, high temperature
Table 1. Ultimate analysis of the sample materials [8].
steam will favor endothermic reactions (Boudouard,
carbon shift and steam methane reforming reactions, no.
2.5, 2.6 and 2.9 respectively), which are responsible for Materials Ultimate Analysis [ wt% dry ]
production of hydrogen and minimize hydrocarbon
formation. Therefore, it is favorable to use pure high C H O N S
temperature steam as a gasifying agent in order to obtain Paper 49.0 6.9 35.0 0.5 0.1
hydrogen-rich syngas. Woodchips 52.6 7.0 40.1 0.0 0.0
Coal 83.3 5.4 8.1 1.6 1.6
3. EXPERIMENTAL
The experiments were carried out in a specially
designed gasification facility that allowed the gasification
of different types of wastes in a batch form using 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
different gasifying agents at desired temperatures. The To estimate the global behavior under various
key components in the gasification facility (Fig. 1) gasification conditions and also to reduce the large test
consist of a combustion chamber and an electrically experimental matrix under which the gasification process
heated furnace. High temperature steam is produced from occurs, a commercial code, Fluent, was used. The method
the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen in the chamber. allowed one to determine the extent of thermal filed
The steam then flows into the electrically heated furnace, uniformity in the reactor. These results in conjunction
which maintains a constant temperature at the desired with a set of experiments were used to determine the
gasification temperature. The sample is placed into a thermal field associated with the steam in test section of
stainless steel basket and then inserted into a 2 ¼” the reactor. Fig. 2 shows a sample of the simulated
diameter stainless steel tube, located inside the furnace. temperature profile associated with the steam flow in test
A gas sampling probe is placed at the outlet of the furnace region of the reactor, which reacts with the feedstock.
to collect representative sample of the syngas produced. The assumptions made in the simulation were: constant
A peristaltic pump is used to withdraw the syngas. The reactor pipe wall temperature of 900°C inside the furnace,
initial steam temperature of 380°C (determined

618
Proceedings of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science 2007, ISETS07 (2007)

experimentally) and a steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min hydrogen as well as carbon monoxide production
(determined from the metered amounts of hydrogen and increases with increase in gasification temperature, while
oxygen fed to the combustion chamber to produce steam. production of methane and carbon dioxide decreases.
The tail end of the test section pipe, outside the furnace Almost no methane or any higher series of hydrocarbons
section, was cooled down by the surrounding air to near are present at the high gasification temperatures
room temperature to about 25°C. It can be seen from the examined. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide concentration
simulation results that a uniform steam temperature of is expected to be the high at high gasification
900°C is maintained in the entire test section where the temperatures due to the endothermic nature of the
sample is located and reacts with the high temperature water-gas shift and Boudouard reactions. Also, the
steam. To validate this simulation, an experiment was endothermic steam-methane reforming reaction
conducted, in which the wall temperature was kept contributes to three moles of hydrogen from each mole of
constant by the resistance heating coils of the electrical methane. At 1200°C the hydrogen concentration at steam
furnace and a steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min was used. flow rate of 6.3 g/min was 51.1 % for paper, 50.5 % for
The results compared favorably well for the sample woodchips and 55.1 % for coal. However, as seen from
gasification case of 900°C. The temperature profiles were the reactions, the steam provides important contributions
found to be similar at other locations and gasification on the amounts of hydrogen produced. Indeed the above
temperatures. A sample of the comparison between amounts of hydrogen concentrations were later found to
simulation and experiments at different locations in the be higher at a lower steam flow rate.
reactor is given in Table 2.

7 0.0
H ydro gen

6 0.0 Me tha ne
C a rbon m on oxid e

5 0.0 C a rbon dioxide


Mol % [ dry gas ]

4 0.0

3 0.0

2 0.0

1 0.0

0.0
6 00 70 0 80 0 9 00 10 00 1 10 0 12 00 13 00

Fig. 2. Simulated temperature profile in the gasification Te m pe ra ture [ C ]

furnace.
Fig.3. Syngas composition from the gasification of paper
at different temperatures at a steam flow rate of 6.3
Table 2. Comparison of temperature profiles between g/min.
simulation and experiment.

Simulation Experiment
Location
[ ºC ] [ ºC ] 70.0
Hydrogen
T1 380 380 60.0 M ethane
Carbon m onox ide
T2 920 900 50.0 Carbon dioxide
Mol % [ dry gas ]

T3 900 850 40.0

30.0

Once the experimental conditions had been 20.0

determined, experiments were conducted using three 10.0


different feedstocks at several different steam gasification
temperatures to determine the influence of these variables 0.0
600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
on the subsequently evolved syngas composition. A steam Tem perature [ C ]
flow rate of 6.3 g/min was used at a nominal feedstock
sample weight of 30 g. The sample gas composition was
acquired after 1, 2 and 3 minutes from the start of the
gasification. For all cases examined, highest hydrogen Fig. 4. Syngas composition from the gasification of
yield was obtained at high retention time of sample in the woodchips at different temperatures at a steam flow rate
gasification chamber (three minutes). Figs. 3 to 5 show of 6.3 g/min.
the syngas composition from the gasification of paper,
woodchips, and coal, respectively. It can be seen that

619
Proceedings of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science 2007, ISETS07 (2007)

70.0 60
Hydrogen
Methane
paper
60.0

Hydrogen [ mol % of dry gas ]


50 woodchips
carbon monoxide
Carbon dioxide coal
50.0
40
Mol % [ dry gas ]

40.0
30
30.0
20
20.0

10
10.0

0
0.0
0 50 100 150 200
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Temperature [ C ] Re action tim e [ sec. ]

Fig. 5. Syngas composition from the gasification of coal Fig. 7. Influence of steam/feedstock molar ratio (increase
different temperatures at a steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min. with acquisition time) on hydrogen yield at 900 °C and
steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min.

Fig. 6 shows the lower heating value of the syngas


produced from the syngas containing hydrogen, CO and 60.0
paper
methane (since the amounts of other gases produced were
Hydrogen [ mol % of dry gas ]
50.0 woodchips
in trace amounts and hence considered negligible to the coal
heating value) from the gasification of paper, woodchips 40.0
and coal. The heating value in the case of paper increases
somewhat with increase in the gasification temperature. 30.0
However, for the case of woodchips and coal, the change
in heating value observed was negligible. 20.0

10.0

300.0
0.0
0 50 100 150 200
250.0
Rea ction time [ sec. ]
LHV of dry gas [ kJ/mol ]

200.0
Fig. 8. Influence of steam/feedstock molar ratio (increase
150.0 with acquisition time) on hydrogen yield at 1100 °C and
steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min.
100.0
paper
50.0 woodchips
The trend observed in figures 7 and 8 on hydrogen
coal
yield is also complemented by CFD simulations using
0.0 commercial Fluent code for the gasification process.
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Figs. 9 and 10 show hydrogen concentration in the
Temperature [ C ] reactor after one and three minutes from the start of
gasification process, respectively, using paper. The
process is simulated by pyrolysis products with fixed
Fig. 6. Lower heating value of the syngas produced from carbon reacting with steam at 900°C and 6.3 g/min flow
gasification at a steam flow rate of 6.3 g/min. rate. Fluid flow is simulated by k-ε turbulent model.
Endothermic reactions are simulated by the EDC reaction
Since a fixed weight of feedstock was used, while model. The feedstock is simulated as a porous volume.
keeping the steam flow rate constant, the steam to The results show increased concentration of hydrogen at
feedstock molar ratio varied as a function of residence longer residence time in the reactor, similar to that
time in the reactor. Syngas samples were taken at 1, 2 and observed experimentally.
3 minutes after inserting the feedstock into the reaction
chamber to determine the influence of molar ratio on
hydrogen yield. Equilibrium calculations showed an
increase in hydrogen production (on a dry basis) with
increase in molar ratio. The results in Figs. 7 and 8 show
the same trend as that predicted from the equilibrium
calculations. Over the range of temperatures examined,
the highest hydrogen yield was consistently seen at 3 Fig. 9. Simulated hydrogen concentration in the reactor
minutes after the start of the gasification. 60 seconds after beginning of the gasification process
with steam temperature of 900 °C and flow rate of 6.3
g/min.

620
Proceedings of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science 2007, ISETS07 (2007)

is formed during pyrolysis of solid fuel (at fuel


temperature of 300 °C to 620 °C) and it consists of heavy
hydrocarbons, which condense upon cooling to ambient
conditions. Tar is responsible for corrosion of gasifiers
and its deposits can clog channels which can be quite
difficult to remove. High gasification temperatures can
significantly reduce the amounts of tar yield. Experiments
Fig. 10. Simulated hydrogen concentration in the reactor were conducted to determine the amounts of tar yield
180 seconds after beginning of the gasification process from the gasification of paper, woodchips and coal at
with steam temperature of 900 °C and flow rate of 6.3 increased gasification temperatures. The results are
g/min. shown in figure 12. A nearly ten-fold reduction in tar
yield was observed by increasing the steam temperature
Two different steam flow rates were used to analyze from 600 °C to 1200 °C in the case of woodchips and
its effect on the syngas composition produced. While paper. The observed tar generation from coal was
higher steam/feedstock ratio usually produce higher significantly smaller for low gasification temperatures
hydrogen yield in a batch reactor, as shown by and the effect of high temperature was not as significant
equilibrium calculations, this is not necessarily the case in as in the case of paper and woodchips. However, the mass
a continuous flow reactor. In this type of reactor kinetics of tar generated was reduced by a factor of two when the
also provide a role. Furthermore, with increase in the temperature was increased to 1200 °C. The lower tar
steam/feedstock ratio, a higher steam flow rate also yield can be attributed to the heavy hydrocarbon chains
reduces residence time in the gasification volume due to being cracked at high temperatures which react with
higher linear velocity of steam since the amount of steam to eventually form hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
feedstock gasified is held constant. Mixing also plays a
role here, as the pyrolyzed sample and steam may not 5
have enough time to completely mix and react with each 4.5
other in the shorter residence time available. These two
4
aspects of the continuous flow reactor are expected to
mtar /mfeedstock *100%

3.5
contribute to lower hydrogen yields in the case of the
higher steam flow rate. As seen in figure 11, the highest 3
Paper
hydrogen yield results from 3.3 g/min steam flow rate at 2.5
Woodchips
1200 °C and at three minutes after the start of the 2 Coal

gasification for all three feedstocks (paper, woodchips 1.5

and coal) examined. At higher steam flow rate of 6.3 1


g/min, carbon dioxide emissions are higher for all the 0.5
three feedstocks but methane yield decreased slightly in 0
the case of coal. 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300

Temperature [C]

70

60 Fig. 12. Percent tar yield as a function of temperature.


50
H2
40
5. CONCLUSIONS
Mol %

CO
30 CO2
The experimental and simulation results from this
CH4 study have shown that high temperature steam
20
gasification process can produce hydrogen-rich syngas
10
containing up to 60% hydrogen with minimal CO2 and
0
3.3 g/min 6.3 g/min 3.3 g/min 6.3 g/min 3.3 g/min 6.3 g/min
hydrocarbons. At sufficiently high gasification
temperatures, tar production can be almost eliminated
Paper Woodchips Coal
from the gasification products, thus making the process
attractive for the clean conversion of wastes and other
solid hydrocarbon materials to syngas with high
Fig. 11. Comparison of the syngas composition from hydrogen content. The process is particularly attractive
three different feedstock at 1200 °C using two different for solid wastes since the amount of tars produced is
steam flow rates at 3 minutes after beginning of negligible at high gasification temperatures. The kinetics
experiment. provides an important role in the amounts of hydrogen
and heating value of the syngas produced as well as in the
The amount of tar generation from gasification of reduction of tars from the process. The amounts tar
paper, woodchips and coal was also measured to examine produced is affected by the gasifying agent type and its
the effect of steam temperature on the total tar yield. temperature. A nearly ten-fold reduction in tar yield was
Tar is an undesired product from any gasification or observed by increasing the steam temperature from
pyrolysis process. However, in the pyrolysis process the 600 °C to 1200 °C in the case of woodchips and paper.
yield of tars can be quite high so that measures must be The observed tar generation from coal was significantly
taken to control its amount in the gasification process. It smaller at low gasification temperatures and the effect of

621
Proceedings of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science 2007, ISETS07 (2007)

high temperature was not as significant as in the case of Resources Technology, September (2006).
paper and woodchips. The kinetics, which has provided 8. Higman, Ch. and van der Burgt, M., Gasification, Elsevier
an important role in the flow reactor used here, should be (2003).
further examined. Reaction rates and mixing cause 9. Cichonshi, W., Hydrogen Generation from Waste using High
deviations from the thermodynamic equilibrium and need Temperature Steam Gasification, MS Thesis, Advisor: A. K.
to be studied in detail in order to determine the optimum Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park, MD (2005).
conditions for the different kinds of wastes encountered 10. Gupta, A. K., Thermal Destruction of Solid Wastes, J.
as well as some of the mixing strategies. Energy Resources Technology, 118 September (1996),
pp.187-192.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 11. Gupta, A. K., Ilanchezhian, E., and Keating, E. L., Thermal
This research was supported by the Office of Naval Destruction Behavior of Plastic and Non-Plastic Wastes in a
Research, Program Director, Dr. Steve McElvany. This Laboratory Scale Facility, J. Energy Resources Technology,
support is gratefully acknowledged. 118, December (1996), pp. 269-276.
12. Gupta, A. K. and Muller, P., Pyrolysis of Paper and
REFERENCES Cardboard in Inert and Oxidative Environment, J.
1. World Energy Council Commission, Energy for tomorrow’s Propulsion and Power, 15-2, March/April (1999), pp.
world 1993 (2006), 187-194.
http://www.worldenergy.org/wecgeis/publications/reports/et 13. Gupta, A. K. and Lilley, D. G., Thermal Destruction of
wan/exec_summary/sum_developments.asp. Wastes and Plastics, Chapter 15 in the Book entitled
2. Jangsawang, W., Klimanek, A. and Gupta, A. K., ‘Plastics and the Environment’, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Experiments for Enhanced Yield of Hydrogen from Wastes (2003), pp. 629-696.
using High Temperature Steam Gasification, proc. 24th Intl. 14. Buczynski, R., Kriengsak, S-N, Gmurczyk, J. and Gupta, A.
Conference on Incineration and Thermal Treatment K., Hydrogen Production by High Temperature Steam
Technologies (IT3), Galveston, TX, May (2005). Gasification of Coal and Biomass, Intl. Incineration and
3. Wei, L., Xu, S., Zhang, L., Lui, C., Zhu, H. and Liu, S., Thermal Treatment Technologies (IT3) Conference, Phoenix,
Steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen-rich gas in a AZ, May (2007).
free-fall reactor, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 15. Sangtongam, K. S., Bruzynski, R., Gmurczyk, J. and Gupta,
32 (2007), pp. 24-31. A. K., Hydrogen Production by High Temperature Steam
4. Pinto, F., Franco, C., Andre, R.N., Miranda, M., Gulyurtlu, I. Gasification of Biomass, EPC Conference, Chicago, IL,
and Cabrita, Co-gasification study of biomass mixed with May (2007).
plastic wastes, Fuel, 81 (2002), pp. 291-297. 16. Cichonski, W. and Gupta, A. K., Hydrogen Generation from
5. Franco, C., Pinto, F., Gulyurtlu, I. and Cabrita, The study of Wastes using Ultra-High Temperature Steam, Proc. 6th Intl.
reactions influencing the biomass steam gasification process, Conference on High Temperature Air Combustion and
Fuel, 82 (2003), pp. 835-842. Gasification (HTACG), Essen, Germany, October (2006).
6. Sangtongam, K., M. Phil Thesis, King Mungkot University 17. Ahmed, I., Noosai, N. and Gupta, A. K., Parameters
of Technology, Thailand, Research conducted at the Influencing Syngas Production from Biomass using Steam
University of Maryland, College Park, MD (2006). Gasification, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Conference,
7. Jangsawang, W. and Gupta A. K., High Temperature Steam Reno, NV, January (2008), Paper No. AIAA-2008-1144.
and Air Gasification of Biomass Waste Fuels, J. Energy

622

Potrebbero piacerti anche